Boondocks, Downtown

Aaron McGruder, By essays of the storyteller.

He had a run with the syndicate and then did two series as a showrunner at Hollywood, with the conclusion of “Don't quit your day job.”

It really shows the political entertainment, for better or was being a product of it's time, with the effort made to capture 2000's suburbia. One that leads from peace to gags made of demand. He aimed his entertainment at the people of colour. 

When your themes are political and on-the-nose by design, you jump in head first without many paradoxes. Into the fray of the experiences of the time, and then out of it. This is more symbolic in its portrayal of the arch-types envisioned. It's part of the territory. You f around and found out being an iconoclastic with that being a brand (or anti-brand brand,) then deal with the controversies.

The better controversies, stuff that can change the culture for the better. Likes talk of copyrighted content and the stuff happening within the war, over the commodified entertainment, the industries and yet-another-electorlism take.

Stuff that won't go into full, again, it's part of the territory of such a contradictory position, he did is best. "artists that are allowed to do what they do for the point of view to make something worth consuming" or as he'd say.

He tried to process his anger through the gags. Through the artwork that have been crammed through the crunch and unrealistic deadlines at the end of the fourth season. Let it stand the test of times of the discussions of art that challenges audiences.

Is there anything to learn about

What if the systems and normalisations does not work, though?

Forever in the feed-back loop that S*** G**** done to me, (If you reacted and think of him too Sigma Grindsetty, I wouldn't blame you.)

Prosumer feedback loops giving reassurance for more direct response.

Habits and reassurances, what is normalised, does it matter?

One when things and matters after auto-regulation, then do these standards are made to be normalised. It's a better to see ones that are made into breathing into the culture, and those worth curating out. Even to the point of anti-convention to become a dependence, and the formula's to be examined for the forms.

The Chud Demographic: Weaponizing Response/engagement rates Bad Meta's

 Oh dear

Now there's a tourist thing that's seems to happen.

Every single time, with a grifter, there's a chance to give a hackney return to regressive needs.

The chud demographic is a abstraction by marketers (multiple meanings) of things that are used to game the algorithm, where others are chasing for fads in regard to moving into a game of likes. The dude-bro Chud demographic shall be a distraction to anybody who wants to move on, unfortunately it's become a business model and livelihoods.

Some lean into the politics deliberately, others don't and work in entertainment.

Consider, though, entertainment itself is a political statement through the hackneyed servitude of the status quo and to consume it unquestionably.

Only best done honestly.

Reflection of the West

"What a repulsive country"

I don't respect a country that dominates both the internet and teaches this hackneyed mass-entertainment to a mainstream audience. Burnout schedules and all that bananas. It's not worthy of any respect or prescription. From the Gary Vee's or Rachel Hollis's. Deep into the Multi-level marketing corruption that's happening.

Guess who won in the electoralist in the west? Oh my It's that.

Even apoltics are politics because of the hackneyed subservience to the status quo. I'd rather be a political in my entertainment than a commodified tool. There are those who hand away their artistry for a quick pay cheque, all for a logical positivist number-go-up life with that's all too it. Replacing a point-of-view and assertion with a scheme, and a reverse-engineer.

Don't want these to be prosumer toys.

Keep on fighting, LGBTQIA+, I'll keep making gay art.

10 min essay on entertainment discussion.

Addendum: I'm not writing about the Honest hacks in entertainment with that blog post, I'm talking about a nation of swindlers and those clerks who follow them. Anyhow, I'll try my best for art within this post-entertainment era. Full of chocolate casein powder 🛋💭🍫

They are swindles within entertainment: that's the point.

Oh well, I'll continue with my own attempt to add-data towards ad-driven platforms, along with multiple of audiences where they think they are owe'd my entertainment.

Welp, In retrospect this is my ranty about electoralism, in ways it can apply to Britain too, oop.

Not everyone a prospect

57 min to add on the essay on the pile.

Have to have with savvy writes books. Mlms have contributed to the blur within our ways with ad-creep.

Ad-creep is a serious danger of everything to be commercialised for subtraction of everything to be into a money-making scheme. Family ain't meant to make money, friends who are there for you do not equivocate into selling them out.

That's personal and private, the social where is the blur that happens the most.