It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse engineering accidents of Dall-E.
Then twitter became X and then an spectacle happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it, now it's a mess.
gambleor (on a shooting) said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that (Bad actors) happen to hold positions which broad brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny." So we are now that stage of polemical convenience.
I'm not representative of my personal boycott of Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out and leaving.
So meta-polemics ooop
I'm not representative of my personal boycott of Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out and leaving.
So meta-polemics ooop
Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them.
Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.
I'm not representative of the Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out.
(Oh, I don't support the OpenAI fudge-up btw, this is me handling a complexity. I'll be misinterpreted and go several different ways due to reading comprehension.
The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within
Tesla and Nfts are stocks are a thing have been bad market crash opnions. Now It's another turn.
Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls 'baby leftism' for lack of a better term (I call it 'wilfully misinformed' or Prerosterous), has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.
This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:
And another bonus link of what to do with sociology by Nicolas D Villarreal. Of executive class dreams. That's a Marxist refutation
The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within
Tesla and Nfts are stocks are a thing have been bad market crash opnions. Now It's another turn.
Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls 'baby leftism' for lack of a better term (I call it 'wilfully misinformed' or Prerosterous), has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.
This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:
- Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient. It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out. Have to give it for fanart/fanfiction here. It's the worst possible argument of eliminative materialism of fair use.
Any copyright framework that will forbid transformative works will have way more damage on startups, and fanart/remixs will be forbidden under the regime.
Gotta claim these models are ontologically non-infringement by design; Input and outputs don't match. Fair use/fair dealing and within the public domain. Nobody should use the anarcho-capitalistic self-ownership principle here. It's way simpler when it's in the public domain; as an idea, nobody does it.
Fan art and cover-band art will be banned due to civic responsibility moving from freelancers to commercial firms. Since the internet is built on infringement already.
It's gonna be like the story the derivative. With the brain implants. Content Id from Disney/Nintendo.
That's my Cassandra, unpopular opinion. - Water has been refuted, repeatedly; here we are. Not even a carbon footprint.
- Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
- Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class/artisan/creative/Petit boug) Yet here we are.
- Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels/koch group Group? Weird centrist opportunists like Ed Zitron,)
My charitable interpretation is they bought in. Most charitable.
Is this yet another reach via an astroturf Christian (family value) fundamentalist, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism! - Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
- Automation is a matter of capital and in regard to freelancers and firms. Too much epistemic certainty from those who aren't epistemic experts. (Post Edit, Also what will get replaced are teleological, capitalistic, commodified jobs in the job market, like copyrighters.
- The clanker slur 'discourse' has became ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
- Also, reflexive consciousness is an argument of people who don't know, So I clarified my position here. I don't have complete certainty, functional conciousness man that I am. So I can't comment on it.
- No, That 95% is an orphaned statistic cheif, it ain't scholarship.
When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.
I must return to the rant since the small-scale bubble of social media isn't reflective of activism at large, since the thing isn't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaptation, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.
We will have to interpellate to this epistemic tech, for no epistemology is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaptation we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. These second-order effects.
So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with proprietary DRM? Misrablist with the Class that's supposed to be a civil lawsuit.
I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right about this leopards eating its own face with its conception of ownership and property.
We will have to interpellate to this epistemic tech, for no epistemology is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaptation we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. These second-order effects.
So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with proprietary DRM? Misrablist with the Class that's supposed to be a civil lawsuit.
When they bring it like this.
Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul supporters and men's rights activists; that's my prediction. Copyright censorship? Nope.
Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul supporters and men's rights activists; that's my prediction. Copyright censorship? Nope.
If boycotts look like this, then it's going to yet another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.
I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right about this leopards eating its own face with its conception of ownership and property.
Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it. We are going to have to re-strategise with understanding this while ignoring the provokers.
So, it's going to be antitrust. Against the laws of censorship of copyright and odd anti-porn in order to win points to a privatised entity that's going. Good thing I'm going to self-publish. This has made me less radical and more of a sociological generalist in terms of allegiances for my campaigning for recognition.
(Oh and don't act like you've got a monopoly unless you go viral and get a Jeremy Clarkson endorsement, celebrity.)
(Oh and don't act like you've got a monopoly unless you go viral and get a Jeremy Clarkson endorsement, celebrity.)
And another bonus link of what to do with sociology by Nicolas D Villarreal. Of executive class dreams. That's a Marxist refutation
