gambleor said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that Thunderf00t and Pat Condell happen to hold positions which broad brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny." (Or opportunism)
Principle, as radical ideas that have questionable roots and Polemics.
I apply it to this situation. Similar to the baseless polarizations and the increased amounts of dead-end intellectualisms. They should of bombed a data center already, yet they are complaining on microblogging. Again.
Principle, as radical ideas that have questionable roots and Polemics.
I apply it to this situation. Similar to the baseless polarizations and the increased amounts of dead-end intellectualisms. They should of bombed a data center already, yet they are complaining on microblogging. Again.
Do not harass this group, despite my biting illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them. They are ultimately a non-event.
I've already been added to two block lists, I shall not name. Already with slurs such as P***** and F****, the polemics, escalation and impossible standard of idealism that anchors it. The military entertainment industry complex has got it.
Time to not die on the hills and deradicalized from the simple and limited views. That are constantly insisted on me in my feeds again and again from the western spectacle that's keeps getting boosted via silly liberal Americas.
Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. It's a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.
Listening and having my beliefs challenged, not by debate, yet by hearing those not of the main-road. The identity
The financial bubble of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started the all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within
Tesla and Nfts have been telling you of such wild dismissals, and I can read to dat and draw it into info and into knowledge. If you've been wilfully misinformed, they are either hustlers or a bad actor. Hustler, there's only so much time to get the information that's sensible, that's not some BuzzFeed article.
Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls Baby Leftism for lack of a better term, (I call it Wilfully misinformed) Has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.
Yes, that's why I've had to moderate my stance on this, focus on broad brushing polemics provided by the perverse incentives of direct response (Things getting more outrageous than they already get"
This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions are going to be gone.
- . Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient, It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out.
- Water has been refuted, repeatedly, here we are. Not valid.
- Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
- Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class petit boug) Yet here we are.
- Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels Group? weird centrist oppourtunists like Ed Zotron, hello?)
Is this yet another reach via angry straight white men, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism! - Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
- . Automation is a matter of capital and in regard to freelancers and firms. Too much epistemic certainty from those who aren't epistemic experts.
- The clanker slur 'discourse' has yet become ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.
Cussy nsfw rant incoming. Befor all of this started, 11 years ago. It's going towards the same trajectory. The bubble on social media is so isolated and that preponderance of response rates aren't like that. Not even a criminologist, there, shooting themselves in the foot.
I must return to the rant since of the small scale bubble of social media ain't reflective of activism at large, since the thing ain't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaption, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.
We will have the foundherently adapt to this epistemic tech, for no epistemological is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaption we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. This second order effects.
So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with properity drm? Misrabalists with the class action lawsuit, ones of blind faith
I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right
Peace ✌🛋 (Got those from know your meme, my favs. Time to walk away from these radical presuppositions, reposting this. Be careful which hills to die on.)
Over the constant polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it.
We will have the foundherently adapt to this epistemic tech, for no epistemological is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaption we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. This second order effects.
So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with properity drm? Misrabalists with the class action lawsuit, ones of blind faith
When they bring it like this.
There boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul Supporters, and Mens right activists, that's my prediction.
There boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul Supporters, and Mens right activists, that's my prediction.
I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right
Over the constant polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it.
