- La Resistance independent -

- sociological report start -

Welcome, sceptics and hyper-believers.

Refutations to respect polysemy of a new age to end the dogmatic eristics of a fantastical boycott. Of vulgar critical theory 💪🛋⭐

The intellectual case. Away from the prosumer

metrology outside.

This embarrassment of praxis ends here.

To the end of the art hall monitors with their false historiography. To point a finger at the AI denial industry of decentralised spaces of prosumerism.

A doxastic space this blind dogma ends here. Couch Gregor is angry. 🛋🔎 He'll do an investigation.

With Gags.

"But Couch Gregor, what do you mean you with the code word draw buff dudes

in tho-"

Done intuitively and counterintuitively.
~

Yes Kevin, I will go down to the dogmas that are presupposed with their precious, oh precious entertainment.

is its useless/usefull? Valueable/worthless? Model/medium?
🛋🔎🔎🔎
It's polysemic. Orthagonal. A big splotch

on the political map!🍅

Historical dungeon and the Ai Dungeon before things where innocent.

(well earlier than that) Since computation has begun.

It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse-engineering accidents involving Dall-E.

all of it was simple before

A call for beep_boop preparationism. No dog in the race. To end the ignorant assumptions, I must dive into the double consciousness of the artisan class.

Then a naughty publicity stunt.

It began.
Then after Alexander Avila, I'm like, why are we fighting? This factionalism or fandom had started. This is leading into a second-opinion bias encouraged by social media.

“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. ”- John Steinbeck

So the temporally embarrassed double consciousness of the copywriter/graphic designers of centralised media.

Then Twitter became X, and then a spectacle happened. The Disney happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it; now it's a mess. The trolls have become snobbified. Something open source nominally got labelled as anti-centralisation. A false base for dialectics is not a way to go for it to be anti-worker. Such is the bad epistemology that had lead to this to seep of the brute truth to the power of the intellectuals and academics biting back at the entertainment industry.

Dogmatic Dialectics? Where does it go? Into the totality of the spectacle.

Yet now..

We must have a discussion about this.

and I've had my investigations. My labels will have come and gone nominally.

Now that, as a preparationist, I suggest you hold onto your cushions.

gambleor (to a shooting applying similar here): "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that (Bad actors hold positions which broadly brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny."

So we are now that stage of polemical convenience.

Beware of polemic commodity of critical theory.

Time to demand a clearance of conceptual confusion.

Of the insufferable wonks and of the copyright maximalists.

Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. This is a call to get out before it's too late.

1.22 hrs. If you want to lowdown on this culture

so, with the tech of the boomers, they come.

There is a mwurican thing happening.
(Tressie Response to a china article)

So the conflicts emerge.. So it's brought.

You're wondering.
(I'll have to do a review of this.)

There's another movement I'm finding insufferable.

I'm not representative of the Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP laws. I'm calling out this dead end of motivated reasoning.

Away from Musk (I ate him in my zine, and that silly xai project my fictional giant destroyed it, i wish he got rid of AIx too. Yet none of my sex life.)

As the grifter reaches the too-good, perfect coherentism of hustle culture and Sam Altman's head of babbling incoherentism of 'stochastic parrots' with all that crunk. There was another group informally growing.

I got this propaganda CTA from a blog I shall not name.

Wow, the oligarch country.

no to the venture capitalists behind this. This is a scalpel extraction.

(Oh, I don't support the OpenAI fudge-up btw, this is me handling a complexity.) I'll be misinterpreted and go several different ways due to reading comprehension.

The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away from AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Taylorist in its destination of all it does. Thanks to the clown who started all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within a reading-blocked essay like this. (You're going to have to read this; I don't have the advertising budget and youtube production budget.)

Tesla and Nfts are stocks that has been in a bad market crash, IM) Now It's another turn. It's all stuck within microblogging, and that's the indictment of the celebrity culture there.

Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls 'baby leftism' for lack of a better term (I call it 'wilfully misinformed' or preprosterism), has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.

This epistemic certainty is gone now; the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:

The false start of the historiography of histronic pattern matching.

"but ain't ai intrinsically doing theft? It's etiological design? It's impure-"

NO✋🛋⚠ Not technically or intentionally.

The alternative is worse.

Proprietary DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient. It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead to danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out. Have to give it for fanart/fanfiction here. It's the worst possible argument of eliminative materialism of fair use.

Any copyright framework that will forbid transformative works will have way more damage on startups, and fan art/remixes will be forbidden under the regime.

Fan art and cover-band art will be banned due to civic responsibility moving from freelancers to commercial firms. Since the internet is built on infringement already. Along with a loss of bargaining leverage by the unions.

So due process, freedom of expression, and freedom to oblivion > disney:nintendo racketeering, Sorry. Sooner that rule of law thing is respected. The less embarrassment I'll get from the entertainment industry.

So, even with this moat they've built, we have to build around it in these decentralised spaces.

It's going to be like the story of the derivative. With the brain implants. Content Id from Disney/Nintendo.That's my Cassandra opinion.

Re-create on resources on the encryption=/=recreation.

Ccia again
by acid communist substack
So the dialectics will comply again from the liberal centre.
Not to say that there are irresponsible and negligent cases. It's easyier to commence fraud with copy+paste though.
Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalise to bad fundamentals like prosperity, dreams and water use (Nickels/koch group?) Weird centrist opportunists like EdZitron, My charitable interpretation is they bought in. This the enclosure of the entertainment media of the centralised media.

Is this yet another reach via an [AstroTurf/incentivised behaviour] Christian (family values) fundamentalist, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Political tokenism, even to doctrinaire intersectional standards.

THE NATURAL CONCLUSION OF ALL THE MORAL PANIC. Of a state-sanctioned monopoly.

ENTERTAINERS! With spectacle

interpretationism.

When they bring it like this. Schadenfreude for the malpractice lawsuit.

Because it;s UN MWURICAN Yeurura Gimma da bread'n circus.

"Result of broken minds, that could be extended to popular ideas online."

or enemy of my enemy is my friend', kind of kruft.

When they will get over this textbook contradiction?

(I wonder what happen to Karla Ortz embezzling all those copyright funds into a reactionary regime.)

So yeah, expanding copyright is anti-worker on the decentralised, unorganised masses.

This anarchist went off on principle. Guess I'll resonate here with the open sourcers

against the propertarians.

To quote:

"X is just Y" may be one of the most insidious thought-terminating clichés I've seen, usually in AI art discourse, but also in other places; it carries some kind of implication that X is worthless or bad, but attaches absolutely no proof...

"Stable Diffusion is just collage!" is one of the most popular. Even though it is wrong, the error is not actually the equation being proposed. The error is the implication that being such *would* make Diffusion any less useful. The message of such a claim is not the content, it is the sentiment.

That's what makes this cliché so dangerous: it sends you to disprove something else of no importance. "GPT is just text prediction" *is* actually true. Yet people want to defend GPT, so they fall for the trap: they say "isn't human reasoning just like predictive text too?" Yet this is debatable.

It can even be completely disproved. As soon as you try to argue against the *content* of the affirmation, you've allowed the wrong debate to take place. The proper answer to these claims is much simpler: "So what? Text prediction is perfectly useful in its own right."

And so on. Collage is a perfectly good artistic medium, even if that isn't what image generation does anyways. Whatever the case may be, I like my tools, and that's all that matters. The gears that it consists of are not relevant to whether the machine is useful. Only I can see whether it helps me.

‪@palecur.bsky.social‬

· 1 Feb 2024

"(thing that is very much a transformative extension of Y) is just Y" happens *all the time* with startups; it is among the laziest tech bro dunk forms that exists"

X is just Y is terminally online social media brained. Designed for social media clout.

The cryptographers then went more direct.

The laws are radically self-defeating according to copyright law. My opinions are here.

Fraud Punctuating cherry-picking a de minimis and a Texas sharpshooter of a function; that's not what they were designed to do.

Or a mereological fallacy as Rahul would say.

Or the Propertarian thought-terminating cliché.

(Or wrong, for the non-believers out there.)

(even he's right here) There's not natural law attached.

So it's not worth my time with false DMCAing any copyright or that.

As a human being. This is a case to be anti.

This is reeks of propertarism, by Richard if the immaterial thought being defended.

Yet we won't have to hope soon, those outside are speaking up with decolonial voices will seek to find a tomorrow sunshine.

Awi Awomosu along with many intellectuals such as Andy Masley will lead.
The no fakes is worst thing that will cause a universal destitution of the decentralised workers. Making style trade dress, that can bog right off.

(so no, fake quote), this is not critical theory. Only blind populism or worse yet,

Mob rule. Making memes to make a point. Since memetic art ain't orginal.

Oh, and there's that little detail.

Extremely confident training is fair use/dealing with that Amouri physical piracy. As digital redistribution isn't an entitlement.

This is the perfect analogy, and guess I'm feeling schadenfreude of such

a silly lawsuit that sent social media into ruination.

Such as EFF, Creative Commons and the Authors Alliance, which I stand with.

Critical theory ought to be against copyright/DMCA from now on.

Reactionaries promoting draconian AI regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark

Oh to repeat quote from my licence opinions

"oh This too. I feel like this is becoming cope bait. Again, too many bad actors hijacking."

Water has been refuted, repeatedly; here we are. Not even a carbon footprint.

So now with that, with the peeps making the base.
Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.

It's a delicate issue so I deal with it there.
Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class/artisan/creative/petit bourgeois). Yet here we are. Neo luddisim does not of a coherent material bas to operate on.
Automation is a matter of capital and in regard to freelancers and firms. Too much epistemic certainty from those who aren't epistemic experts. (Post Edit: Also, what will get replaced are teleological, capitalistic, commodified jobs in the job market, like copyrighters. Also, it could create jobs, sooo substitution/automation. Soooo lets not get so presumptive. Outsourcing already happens.

So there's the polysemy of substition/augmentation and there are solutions to both.
Thats another post and 8 hour video essay for your thoughts. It's likely to go up again. It looks like something branded as anti-left from decentralised sources, though; that's what I'm questioning.

Let the capitalist hypebeasts race to the bottom.

The clanker slur discourse has become ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
With it becoming a norm of hierarchy status.
Also, reflexive consciousness is an argument of people who don't know, So I clarified my position here.

Functional salience consciousness/alive sapience consciousness polysemy.
My feeling revealed there.

It does express salience for metacognition with natural language input, so. While not deserving of deontological right, it can be treated with lower-order consciousness.

~~GOLEMS HAVE SOULS! OKAY!~~ Oh, okay then, this will go in with philosophers on substack.

Oh, we are not going back in the consciousness debate again
data scientist.

I don't have complete certainty or gradualist consciousness, man that I am. So I can't comment on it. Yet I know the stochastic parrots sucks and the chinese room feels like a wrong now. Cannot play with that chinese room as others a pushing in.
No, That 95% is an orphaned statistic cheif, it ain't scholarship.
Wow! Witch hunts! Neoliberal purity culture at it's finest, such a totality of contradictions it's getting embarrassing malpractice, with misplaced understanding that's growing absurd.
It does not create brain rot and brain damage,

Infinite thought too; consider the alternative.

This is videogame panic all over again, for moralist fads.
Also, if you want a more philosophical refutation here it is.
Those sound waves nope. Andy Masley covered it.
Oh and increased power consumption remains dubious and extends towards to MWURICas energy usage. Expanding to a energy issue, not an ideological ai issue.
Oh yeah did I tell you the classifiers don't work and are a cottage industry in of itself, well you are the product.
Some pretentious YouTuber threw a clock study to disprove capability; there's that here.

Yet that leads into bad epistemology.

I can't control the winds and the weather of macro waves of sociological forces, though. It's not like they'll galvanise or radicalise bad epistemics of infinite regression.

There will always be vendors for those subsumed.

Sigh, there's an industry now. Even with my irenicism, I can

Only keep it quiet here.

~~doxing and harassing with malpractice~~

Direct action!

this

We will have to interpellate this epistemic tech, for no epistemology is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaptation we can survive to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. These second-order effects.

Tech, tool, medium whatever. It's getting rebranded I'll have to demand for it's irenicism (that will never happen) yet the reaction is broken; that's why I foundherently reject it. Since the smug left has adopted the presuppositionalist tactics from the cristian reactionary fundamentalists.

So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with proprietary DRM? Misrablist with the Class that's supposed to be a civil lawsuit.

This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul supporters and men's rights activists; that's my prediction.

Another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.

I may be fighting the long gone mobs myself, lest I
become a subject to this meme.

Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it. We are going to have to re-strategise with understanding this while ignoring the provokers.

So, it's going to be antitrust. Against the laws of censorship of copyright and odd anti-porn in order to win points for a privatised entity that's going. Good thing I'm going to self-publish. This has made me less radical and more of a sociological generalist in terms of allegiances for my campaigning for recognition.

(Oh and don't act like you've got a monopoly unless you go viral and get a Jeremy Clarkson endorsement.)

"Just kill this naive bubble." Or, control the conversion rate/conversation

So then, they're putting humanism on there goods/services as if it's luxury, as if

Those lower from other countries are listening to how such shame structures operate.

You don't even have to use them to see this is going into a bad infinity of scepticism. (That's a little bit of hegelism for you.) So, Why not lean in the technocapital as the technoserfs themselves can't take it seriously anymore?

Even the jesters of the world this a gag to bait those sceptical, outdated presumptions

fall for it every single time

(It's real btw, he got so much attention he minted a proof of stake Ethereum nft. Which is environment-friendly proof of stake. Rather than busywork.)

I'm starting to agree with this provocateur mememister.

So they will use it to bait the high status-seeking snobbishness out.
Insulting intellectuals' labour.

Disney is an entertainment company mwurica, this is an academic explanation.And another bonus link of what to do with sociology by Nicolas D Villarreal. Of executive class dreams. That's a Marxist refutation

(bonus link.) Also my reading list As with all things, this is going to deal with anti-science murica left. So it's time to nationalise and away from private equity, and moral panic industry complex. Or heck, Even the Ai denialist industry complex. Heck though, It's got all the intellectuals and dummys like me in a twist.

At least I know I'm entertaining.

I'm going to go with programmers and others who happen to

Rely on the physical laws on this.

It's all gone into a culture war.

This is the Anti Ai trap of populism and I'll quote.

"But the ranks of La Résistance (and the academics most attuned to it) too often default to mockery. AI is just “synthetic text extruding machines” and ridiculous poop analysis startups. Among the intelligentsia of the AI Resistance, there is too little serious engagement with the fact that the world’s most prominent mathematician is in real time, showing how AI will change mathematics forever. Or that agentic coding has changed how software developers work around the world, even though it only really started working last December. There is little acknowledgement that millions of people find LLMs profoundly useful.

And I’m sorry to break it to you, but AI is not a scam. There are scammy AI products, scammy AI startups, scammy AI evals, and scammy people trying to staple “AI” onto whatever they were already selling. But the underlying technology is real, and it will change the world.

A serious theory of resistance, therefore, cannot rest on pretending otherwise. You will not understand the impact of AI if you use only the free version of ChatGPT to call it “stupid”. If the current version of AI’s “Project” doesn’t sound appealing to society, I think it is our job to reshape it. But the current plot dismisses that there’s something fundamentally different about GenAI, in particular, LLMs. In the AI Con, Bender and Hanna “reject untestable ‘everything’ machines that are marketed as ‘general purpose technologies’. ” And instead say that we need ‘specific tools geared towards specific tasks.’ This is opposed to the empirical reality of machine learning, sometimes referred to as “the bitter lesson.” And sure, we should be serious about validating systems in the application layer — but pretending generality itself is a scam will not help us govern the technology we actually have."

Despite some sympathy, ideologically these may be the sentiments

as all the hoopla goes away.

The conservative mental model are tilting at windmills of futility of how capital operates with free-market ~~perverse~~ incentives

Liberal mental model is that it's a status game turned up to 11.

Dialectical communist mental model it's the Pied Piper making the Artisan class reactionary. Denying the productive forces for the petit-bourgies socialism as he said within German ideology.

Deontological will be you can't de-humanise yourself from mistreating the intrinsic justness welfare of a subject.

as all political stripes will see the fad of the lunch table.

This is to not to say tech can't have bad side and abuses. (agriculture for one) Yet, I can't this boycott/activism seriously anymore.

Irenicist I must go! To irenicsim, the denialism ends here.

Then nationalise this like Switzerland is doing.

This natural language coding, along with it's polysemy will keep me irenic'n neutral. With all the VC and so I kindly ask for you to consider this manifesto in cyberspace. To down the troll apologists

Please be more irenic and apathetic.

Less derogatory slurs of the bros of microblog artist.

I cannot answer for the industry, especially on social media.

Stop drawing lines in the sand.

👇Nico's Gargoyle for dreams of peace.

To conclude: This is the inchoate leftism at its most hustle naivety.
It's all but a..

COMPUTATIONAL SPECTACLE 💥

Mwurica believes in inconsequential ENTERTAINMENT of bi-Partisan womps!

expect this theme for the next 5 years
To the others.

Why do I owe you all of this? IDK. When they'll talk shop with
Pontification: I can show them this as if I owe them special credentials.

1. Side note, I haven't used AI in this, merely my natural cognitions and critical
thinking skills to look at the west and go wha

- LA RESISTANCE -

End! 💪🛋🌈

Nov 29, 2025

Against Beep_Boop fandom/hatedom factionalism

A call for beep_boop preparationism. No dog in the race. To end the ignorant assumptions, I must dive into the double consciousness of the artisan class.

COMPUTATIONAL SPECTACLE 💥