The culture of the Narcissim, of egoist desire

Various Lacan Refutations and gags are shared.

Yet with this way, it's like our own ideas and eyes to the manner of mental diving, it could be capital, and we could leave it that. Yet with that with how society functions.

Yet this one is with the lack of imagining of the past and where things go forgotton, where the spam goes, where the ideas go.

The romanticised family and how, in a way, it essentially reflected another anti-American kind of critique of culture.  The things that resonate with a rustic sentiment of wanting things to stay in the past, even in certain liberal critiques and other ways, and how those things get recuperated and brought back into the fold.

One could always call this a return to anti-intellectualism now, and the Glonzo theories that I keep hearing from the microbloggers as I try to do my studies.

Family theories, too many family theories. But the concept of narcissism, with roots going back, and how that concept itself has become another quick grift of hustlers with a feverish entitlement to profit and plenty of justifications for that profit, a perverse incentive. 

But oh, what a surprise. There is not even a simple idea anymore that cannot be sold now as they take it up in the arms of this new, ongoing culture war.

Going to have to hunker down, even though I know it's not going to be the case. So that's my first impression.

Ways of seeing by John Berger did this critique better

So now I'm going with that audio book with various intellectuals in substack as this moral panic passes.

The alternative mind on Neurodiversity

Minds and its activism of alternative thinking and other pathways of how its history has always impacted my autism. So we have to understand this isn't going to be a long game of fighting in the trenches, trying to get recognised via a normal people, and even then you're trying to go against the grain with others in the normal way.

Normalisation of this little section, like here. That i can't help.

Am I really in that normal to you? 

Leif Weatherbys frenchy Semiology book

Beware, French structuralist theory ahead

Since French semiology and all that terminology are in fashion now, somebody in the digital humanities had to reflect on the cultural tech zeitgeist that we're all facing. Being the one out of it.

Such as the term 'kitsch' and all the things that might team with a function and poesis, dyscobia, and a convincing case of non-consciousness being about, I am yet to suspend my judgement on that.

He does reveal that this kind of cultural panic and humanism have an archaic route within Noam Chomsky. Something I'm not going to have to watch out for are the coming years, as we embrace a rather radical centrism of data and pros of a scientific rigour.

The way such it is, as he has better terminology than all of American exceptionalism, though, is giving me solace, because such a spectacle we observe, and this is being understood now from outside of it, and that's going to be good enough in Europe.

Oh, the denial is getting remorseless, deeper in periods now as I explore the polemics.

The wars continue.

On Beep_Boop an honest investigation of fanaticism

- La Resistance independent -

- Sociological report start -

So what's your opinion on emerging tech? On AI?

Your incredibly opinionated manner you himbo waltz into
The due diligence for your [ Perfect coherent interpretation here ]

That's most divinely reconciliatory.
Okay serious.

Short answer: My position is sociologically with the epistemics of Susan Haack, Henry Ferrel, Abi Awomosu, aesthetically with Masamune Shirow, intepretability from Matteo Pasquinelli. Discard the malpractice didney lawyers with culture war kruft. Digi-ethics research is like that within OSS and academics.

Reading this essay and coming to your own conclusions with the overall thing. Since I'll cover all the philosophical positioning and typology.

Medium Answer:

This by Alice

It's a mixed review of the various critics of the venture capitalists and brings it's own conclusion of a solapunk/scrapunk. Garrison Lovely has a decisive take on Ed Zitron. I've had my own commentary with that model collapse.

"Most AI debates aren’t really about evidence. Instead, they’re arguments about futures that none of us have seen.

Nobody has seen superintelligence, a machine that most people agree is conscious, or a fully automated economy. Evidence can be gathered, but it underdetermines the conclusion. To fill the gap, we fall back on a combination of philosophy, political intuitions or, in some cases, tribal identity."

Oh, Kirby has a video too. Full Version
Andy Masley had a video too 2 years ago, with the catechism

Karl Mark and the german idealists have it. A free Article on it. About the essaykin of automation/augmentation. This is the long line of left technoprogressives

Along with Pure Koors vids for the furries

Long Answer:

Welcome, sceptics and hyper-believers. 👋🛋

Refutations to respect polysemy of a new age to end the dogmatic eristics of a fantastical boycott. Of vulgar critical theory 💪🛋⭐

The intellectual case. Away from the prosumer

metrology outside.

This embarrassment of praxis ends here.

To the end of the art hall monitors with their false historiography. To point a finger at the AI denial industry too.

A doxastic space this blind dogma ends here. Couch Gregor is angry. 🛋🔎 He'll do an investigation.

With Gags. Then, like Ghost in the shell illustrator, you'll know his position.

"But Couch Gregor, what do you mean you with the code word draw buff dudes

in tho-"

Done intuitively and counterintuitively.
~

Yes Kevin, I will go down to the dogmas that are presupposed with their precious, oh precious entertainment. Trivially true into the future.

is its useless/useful? Valueable/worthless? Model/medium?

Whatever valence to put [derogatory slur] or [laudatory commendation] of linguistic coding?

🛋🔎🔎🔎

Look at all those Cartesian maps! Andy Masley bottom and Tree of Woe bottom right.

It's polysemic. Orthagonal. A big splotch

on the political map!🍅
So a go-go with non-expert couch Gregor.

1

Historical dungeon and AI Dungeon before things were innocent.

(well earlier than that) Since computation has begun.

It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse-engineering accidents involving Dall-E.

all of it was simple before

A call for beep_boop preparationism. No dog in the race. To end the ignorant assumptions, I must dive into the double consciousness of the artisan class. To that, with the couch gregor explains his multiple poistion.

Then a naughty publicity stunt.

It began.

Then after Alexander Avila, I'm like, why are we fighting? This factionalism or fandom had started. This is leading into a second-opinion bias encouraged by social media.

“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. ”- John Steinbeck

So the temporally embarrassed double consciousness of the copywriter/graphic designers of centralised media.

Then Twitter became X, and then a spectacle happened. The Disney happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it; now it's a mess. The trolls have become snobbified. Something open source nominally got labelled as anti-centralisation. A false base for dialectics is not a way to go for it to be anti-worker. Such is the bad epistemology that had lead to this to seep of the brute truth to the power of the intellectuals and academics biting back at the entertainment industry.

Yet now..

We must have a discussion about this.

and I've had my investigations. My labels will have come and gone nominally.

Now that, as a preparationist, I suggest you hold onto your cushions. This one is going beyond the Ed Zitron, and Cory Doctorow.