Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Hobbyist media theorist. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
Beep boop, read my wires boy, read my robutt wires.
That's it! I'm reading a book because the copyright wingers using there existance on abolshing fair use are too much.
So I decided to try to get my moneys worth via reading research in this discovery of llms/diffusion models.
(Even if it's bad, I've read Ayn Rynd, is this comparable? Part of the writer's training! HOOOOOOOOOO!) Lets see how much this fascinates or tires me.
2023 Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick
I've changed my opinion
Starts with explanations of weights, and token prediction. Existential risk and ethics, lawsuits, Japan, ethics discussion. This if it's all a matter of understanding what the tech can do in terms of capabilities and incapabilities is going to really have to see through.
These four rules are his tenets that he elaborates on for a possible alternative with dealing with the tech, how people hide, how people use it, and what are the possible sci-fi futures that move along it. Here's his Ai Research blog.
I shall put him in the neutral AI category and better-reporting-that-Ed-Zetron-box. I'm going to keep his machine inferences under wraps.
Guess this is under the editorial because somebody having a nuanced take on machine learning is impossible now with this naughty journalist seeking those hot, HOT scoops! It's over-editorialised now, huzzah.
Doomerist to the anti. I really like this book. 5 stars, Americana angst like Infinite Jest. Fully recommend.
It's the way that's the, Humiliation machine, of insecurities.
The scene of the drama coming from the phone and the tension between the drama inside the internet and then
Then all the doom'n gloom with the discourse of ai, woman, the world, and misery, all ending in a place that's most hopeful. Where all the characters are made to go through waves and then the ending of the legelese, mwa. Being a internet dweller, I have to get off with all this long tail of discourse that we all sit in.
It claims to be a self-book, a horny one. A sadomasochistic spiritualism.
"Fear and desire are the same"
Physch Book of bringing the energy of the tension of pleasure and pain.
Ty Gacha
Orgasmic meditation of an axiom, to be not tested, tries to develop from the law of attraction and calls out its contradictions, provided with finding dark parts of the subconscious and deciding to be at one of all the under-beings.
Yet all this antithesis and agonism of respecting ones subconscious dark side really sounds like good role-play, and it's all within the word play with the term meaning irreducible abstraction to the expression of a being that is shared with child and adult alike, it's the means that brings us together and provides the groundwork to a community.
Black and white, the conceptional distinction made to believe in the systems and metaphysical engines of our worlds.
While suggestion pleasure sessions of the darkest selves of anti-instrument to bring out the intrinsic parts then made to understand like some sort of vent comic, coming the most of existential part of the discovery of it all.
Discovery, that what this is, not fanciful invention.
It happens to dive into recommending a bdsm club too at the end, I can't really believe of the law of attraction though, and Carolyn puts here critique forwards, it's all about sexual exploration, such one can't get off made actualised of a discovery of another chapter of one's life.
Guess this is a frank confessional on state-craft. Examining ideologies and then moving back into diplomatic entertainment. This will be the most labelist piece, and all these are not to be pressures as I circulate through the ideological forces around my time and place.
DIPLOMATIC ENTERTAINMENT, even that has contradictions, don't you see? Yet here we go with another narrativising pull. As a host! Yet State-craft opinion is something for those who never tire of it.
Play this while I type, shall we?
Defeatism, miserablism. And Depressive hedonism. Is that the way of this little book, recommended by Alex Avile? It is all, merely gothic, gothic materialism of fragmented self dwindling in the vastness. I dig it. I've had to ameliorate with looking into the darkness and bringing the stuff out of me.
There's a lot to appreciate here, If I can skip the talks of Stalinism/Marxist Leninism then it's pretty good of capturing the mass media cultish zeitgeist that predominates our lives as capital is made to social, then it's returned in that of a realist mindset as everything is reduced into an exchange value of such with all the gift ecomonys returning into a questionable mirage.
Everything to be bastardized I guess, Or what was Marc Fischer's goal of acid communism to come up with from such concepts to our ends and desires, of such drab material gothic ends.
Then it goes back again. Yet his quote "It's easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism" Wow, that draws an image within the cosiere circles. They're all hidden away within private accounts of twitter now, 2018 was a way to go.
Well, it certainly shines a light of my own pluralist tendencies and ideological presuppositions. Twitter feels like it's regressed, along with its containment unit of Bluesky, and I'm here, wondering the hours like it shall get along. I keep flipping back and forth of the principles of anarchism and Marxism scroll from the site as things draw around from confessional after confessional, it feels like I'll have to examine all the statecraft structuralisations and introspect.
Now there's tension between the Luddites and the accelerationists with that tension, I cannot relate to the Luddites any more due to the guild failure, since with my own confession like with Harlan Ellison, even guilds and unions can sell out.
Even as a drift on, I'm resonating with Neil Postman's and Mark Fischer's Accelerationist. One that is different, one with technology. Yet now, at this rate, We are to deal with such contradictions as of now.
Why, oh why, do I happen to come, where every artist justifies making money with Michelangelo and Shakespeare commercial plays, that the Mona Lisa was a non-profit project. Oh, such a complication.
1Dime, Badmouse, Finnishbolshevik (A little, one video on libertarian socialist rants), and Burn These books, Noj Rants. I keep reading these statecraft books. I'm not even as I can speak with authority as a drifting fabric on soviet historiography. Undecided as a ponder through, I've still got the society of the spectacle silently judging me as try to incorporate it within the fictional complexities of my artwork.
Thanks for reading. I'll get back to it. Along with the labelism. Your still going to get labelled anyway.
(Oh, and you're wondering why there cannot be between unity, I think of this by Badmouse, could not fully follow him when he left the ml space, yet with the time he's become a libertarian socialist. Welp, that's what ideological primordial souping does to you. Still like his electorlism, and baby vaush video minus the adultism.)
(I don't even watch Vaush, guess a lot of info has been revealed about him that Badmouse was incorrect about, oh well, that's truth value)
Neither Techonopoly of mediamonopoly (That's what copyright is btw, state-sanction monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us), It could be the with the right of the city and with being "A loving resistance fighter", or a diplomatic entertainer. So that we can move past such a pleasure principle and interpassive proconsumerism that we can see our own cycles.
Deep, man. Some concepts to take and give away, was he really pushing for a space-communism? Or was it meant
That's what these stream of consciousness happen though, hypocrisy naturally emerge, then with error theory they are naturally for a better collaboration. Or 'better' means monopoly/monopsomy.
Addendum:
(Further post-edit note, I'm not following Cory Doctorow much now, he's right on copyright yet this time to understand encrudificaiton, it has to go deeper than that when it comes to host service deterioration.)
I'm doing these editor books as entertainment now, even if my training ain't going to be registered.
"World W**** three, Batman P***, Sign my D***"
"Writing has to be one of the loneliest professions in the world" Really chuck?
"You don't write to make friends" - Joy Williams (Within the weird plot/dialogue chapter I did not make sense off) Robert Mckee had a better book on dialogue.
He shares random, separate quotes, his bios with working with advertisers and writing is the most interesting.
Despite making edgy jokes and autism it feels mis aimed, it does not really feel that reactionary. It's selective with our ideas, as I did feel like what he's trying to come at from his perspective of behind an art's degree.
Maybe I'm jaded, though.
All ideas and public resonance with advertising being a crap shot, many does not know that Chuck was trying to compartmentalise reading David Foster Wallace along with other books and trying to process those feelings into a book of advice and going. "If you were my student"
He tends to go Respectability>Likeability within a character, that's where the character traits align of the patterns of the mode of a sympathetic Protagonist.
"Don't do dreams in developing tension" Well, David Lynch may have a disagreement with that. "It's my instructions I was taught" Okay Chuck.
3/5 first chapters
Next is the process. Ideation. Talks of piracy, talks of superheros doing inexplicably things with the comic writers, he's an unfriendly sort, yet you expect his ideation to travel and flow through.
Then at the times when it comes to the idea where he takes you, it's the most outlandish, off-the-wall ideas with his Hollywood formula which I'm most likely never going to follow, or maybe I do, if you've got your pattern-seeking eyeballs up.
Dirty entertainment book, maybe it will be used as reference, I'd prefer the Story Grid or Robert McGee.
What a dirty, dirty boook. DIRTY! Slap it with a rolled newspaper dirty!
3/5 still, pick'n choose.
(Oh, the best part was him dealing with hungry advertisers about not delivering enough eyeballs to the Superbowl, shows how advertisers of short-term and self-absorbed as they could not handle his character. )
Enjoyed it, playing it silently on twitch. Recommended by Anita Sarkeesian.
Oh, that BDSM. The chatrooms, of the ways, and the lack and showing of integrity of or works from an erotica writer no less, lots of manly men she wrote, now out of the horny haze, she's written here own book. An essay of sex workers speaking their own stories along with documenting their ways to make history, is the written language that are made.
From the first inception of the 'collective shout' and then of various scares through the ages. Then it continued with a silly ending of people venting their sexual catharsis off, Ain't as dirty as Chuck Paluniuk. (Going to take a shower). It's a little amusing with the amount of sex toy talk.
(As for the deep fake stuff, that's another technical episode I will have to ponder on.)
While all the F****** along with the note on deep-fake software being used with the disrespect of the sex working class. That's a note to keep in mind with P*** being a underscore ugu buga on YouTube. For we all need sexual tasks like appetites and drives, and it's the thing that common, arguably too common. This tries to argue to be not common, which is fruity.
Recommended. For erotica will forever remain.
Two memes going around of prurient polemics. I forgot who done the edits.
I've tried to put gender into my art, with it taking it seriously rather than an annoyance.
Oh Judith Butler, haven't read the others yet this one without the audiobook experience, and it's the anti-gender movement that's within the growing collective shout and other evangelical groups, this is a ideological dissection by an anarchist. (Expect the words authoritarian and totalitarian to be used here and there, although I don't think such of a meaning given my own position.)
It does get in the core clarification to sex/gender as a co-construction with Anna-Faust-Sterling, and it's the best part, along with shooting down how gender is an imperialist invasion made by the Vatican. Such a matter is a physio-semantic construction of not understanding what gender within the conservative groups. It is all but a phantasm.
Such is a matter to transition from fundamentalism to foundherentism in terms of epistemological structures that we are to see a shift from these ruling and attacks, from collective shout and the moral majority.
Alex avile and Abigail Thorn, two youtubers who have delves into such a matter for defending transgenderism. If you'd like the light version.
( Oh, and the note of the lack of literacy of those who have merely read the bible along with those who have seen YouTube videos is something to note with the audiences to this kind of regressive campaigning, some have only read the bible, some others read minimally. Others have circled with the books, so this bookspeculation. )
Wow, the writing of a queer sexworker and entertainer could have gone oxymoronic, it does not.
Marsha was killed, Marsha was persecuted, Marsh was into through hate. Through the stories of the Aids epidemic.
The beginnings of a hustler.
A hustler, that name was used complimentary here and not derogatory. Well, with my own baggage with the term. I guess, in the oligarchical logic of our term. That's merely another reflection of the westerns economic pressures that I can't happen to imagine yet feel sympathy for.
Emotional at the end of the contributions, with a redundant 'all rights reserved', don't worry, I'll tell my experiences. There were so many shades to an entertainer that brought to light as she dealt with the strife of the misogyny, transmisogony, and by the river.
What an effect it does have somebody, along with the law that ignore.
Tim Wu and all this way of thinking about attention and the such a way.
With our centre of attention, where it is being directed, where does it go? What will it do and what will define us. From our own ownership that's collective and personal, to our own means to stretching forth.
Julian Baggini's how to think like a philosopher. Had got me thinking that if things are analysed. His first chapter was on the matter of where the attention of distribution, which is easily measured today. Take note where the cues are coming over if certain argumentation is abstract and thought experimentation, there's a time and place for it, not here. ( I've still yet to read all his books on philsophy and paraphrase, it's my first impression. )
Well, Part of the organising strategy is to see if it could be invested or reinvested elsewhere.
Decide the centre of attention, the mise en place, decide on the future.
Structuralisations of scenes keep multiplying. This one weaves of a plan with etymologies and then into the narratologies with digression of strands and strings to boot.
Waves, cell-like, little ripples, meanders, spiral and explode, the world and historiography of our scene creativity is vast, with various risks to the status quo ante.
Such is our words defined by ideological, abstract foundherentisms. Our wisdoms and knowledge not set within a rigid framework of our history is to be expanded on our inexhaustible resources of our mind.
Shakespeare wrote the love was blind, that includes carnality.
Sadomachositic sexccessful fiction, did not know to feel pleasure or pain of these takedowns of the industry of sex we are facing. Portnoy being the oldest, snuff the latest. All from flawed villains except from the messy climax of Snuff.
Portnoy's Complaint
Now this is an embarrassing tale of bumbling excess or a confessional cautionary tale of sex flumps, ending with a psychological nightmare of being tried for such lecherous activity.
It ends with one of the most humiliating confession and woopsey self-pleasure accidents that's a brought to the typographic imagination.
Snuff
World *W***** Three*
What a situation of hang ups with a porn actress as the villian within this mini-plot of the actors having to deal with synopsis of each mini show of the industry, the place like becoming a pearl out of a cockle of an industrial stone heart.
This could be a critique of sexcess or the opportunistic contra dictionary glass house with entertainment, of course it's money the goal.
Great clownery, of all our ideas it's a clown show that ends in a painful amount of hyper-consumerism.
Here's a NSFW video on chucks view, and his response to the libertarian villain behind it.
28 minutes. What a twisted W****achry, love-hate, this must be a romance
As with all things with love'n sex, it can get complicated.
Y'know with the racist and sexist rants tied with a lust for money, with a voice of guttural sex and one of money, it's so recursive of this villain's desire for money it becomes like a broken record, money, money and money.
Everything is corrupted by profit accumulation here, as we do so under our own hypocritical licensing laws. Including the sluggish beast of the protagonists selves in sex and money. It all becomes a character study as an oil baron with the petrodollar, various sex workers and industries including with other confessions of a bigot of somebody who won't be on my Christmas card list.
Does nor exist, economists log off. There is the knowledge domain. What they ain't is a scarcity of knowledge. Such a scarcity with what is able to be searched today.
Such a dubious concept, along with the attempt of an intellectual monopoly and monopsony. As if thought can be controlled. Such a matter with idea's concepts and style that are too broad to be categorized with a thing.
This brings a division, on how these matters where tutors tell other artists to use reference, yet not when it comes to copyright, our that such a matter concerned with its own withering and the means to monetize.
These are the alternative laws with regard to displacement with others, with defendants can in regard to maximalism of licensing laws.
From Alix Aviles* second video.
Oh dear, looks like it's going to be a combination of AI and Copyright, yet with such licensing laws there's going to have to be a reimagining with them. Or circumnavigating them, as it merely will make fan iterations impossible.
Copying non-commercially was forever a practice within classical academics, I've done sight size method myself as a manner of teaching Copying were to mean to bring design patterns and their aesthetic axiologies into a new repeatably and consistency. Copying will help transform and merge
A scientist goes does deep down of the ideology of libertarian, western thought - pro capitalist thought left behind via Ayn Rand. Well, I could draw a line down there, Adam does not know how that from Steven Jay Gould and to the moment of our technocracy of yearning for a sense of control, a matter that transcends copyright and the licensing laws of the ownership to our attention and the control of it with our attentional facilities
That reminds me when it's comes to AI within the idea of making our own ideas with controlling the conversation, aiming for the outsider.
1:34 hours (Yeah there was criticism where the sponsor previously, yet welcome to the machine of entertainment that we live in. ) *Anywhere, here's the vid
That's curious, that was a different definition of accelerationist, (Maybe he's using a different definition which I don't hold. The direct action plan sounds well, though. Also with something off-base with certain sources such as Mark Fischers miserablism.
It's all.. Mild and inoffensive, though, all things considered. Even with the direct action strategy.
Yet the legal battle, I can't really join in that circus.
(This one is on my to-read list, so many on the bucket list.)
Tom scott also did a video in regard to other work
Patricia also did a video in regard to understanding the licensing laws. It's not going to be easy.
Well, imagining other means such as a right to the city and other means of direct action is a anarchist methodology of accomplishing that's also suitable. Also, the handshake deal that is taken for granted. Such as a simplicity on that with a written agreement.
The copyright industry complex. Urgh. Why are so many willing to die on that hill?
Has our licensing laws every been pro-worker? Look at those perverse incentives.
As with the naturalistic reductionists with what happened with religion, so will there be a trend with our own licensing laws. What I also dislike about this reductionism that it reduces all aesthetic energy to how much will commodify it, the get-rich-and-famous contract. Something wiggling inside me is telling my that's not art.
So, to confirm.
LLM and Diffusion models are remixing tech that's mindless and iterative to our designs. Only through the deal that ain't contingent of NDA's and several escrow payments and paperwork, we could do work or anti-work that makes a difference.
Thoughts...
My editorial:
I tend to prioritize fraudulent behaviour than ontological perfection of IP/Copyright. John Lockian property rights are a liberal conception that can lead into petty sport of the printing press. (Even John Locke opposed monopoly, btw)
I don't like either the diffusion model training data and copyright. It's catnip to industrialists because they are about faster and cheaper product.
I'm currently doing more journalism within the legalese stuff, this gets quite
editorial and even into political and economical matters. Never underestimate the simple, direct transaction over complex.
Since property rights are easier to argue from an industrialist due to capital, it's only a matter of not playing their game. Only a different game and system that the independent not dependent of the commercial industry.
( Oh and if they decide to content ID this article on Goofy being incredibly hot, they erm I guess I told you so. Guess entertainment ain't an amorphous blob. ) Guess I'll have to preserve it here for great justice.
I guess this is a matter of taking a deep breath. Along with focusing on the main struggle. I guess that's enough of this hornets nest of da industry.
Well well well, it's political science books to varying degrees of success as couch gregor must editorialise then into
Befriending capital to move along with it, I guess.
So what is it with the economy. Good enough to introduce others into the economy and seeing a refutation of freakonomics.
It's time for Couch Gregor to attempt to articulate a thoughtful comment on complicated socio-economic issues with vulgarising into a simplified sex jokes.
Frugality and house management or so the word means, scarcity is also another word for economy.
Oh, look it that, there is the talk of UBI, I'm not a fan for the purposes of this world. Even though there's the example of Canada and Africa, Since it's such a libertarian concept already, I'd prefer welfare'n benefits. Yet such a structuralisation of policy is beyond my scope of this.
Good for beginners including knowing the money and capital that they will have to learn eventually in financial management, yaaaaaaaaaaay.
Industrial usage of efficiency and convince, used as an adjective by advertisers This may be the case used over quantifying everything and trusting economists too much
Reminds me other this audiobook, Americanised, unfortunately. Yet it takes all the challenges of carving up a piece of capital for oneself, well shifting it into a public is a matter of thing that's meant to be dragged as she mocks small business and other intuitions with other executives, then she goes into the way of equitable business.
Why is it like Bioshock that a liberal gets to dunk on a libertarian, annoying anarcho-capitalist philosophy of infinite free market?
This is a book that shows that the free market does not exist, well, well then. Even if you may disagree with a lot of other opinions and nuances, I can't help but giggle to push another kick.
I'll attempt to be spoiler-free, this one is where the ways happen with fiction writers will be more understood.
What happens to a land of magical gangsters, heritage and the higher classes along with the desire of going through the pretentions of genius, talent and merit.
Meritocracy as a satire first, then taken in odd sincerity by pundits are taking in stride here.
Yet it's all a hall of mirrors as there is a mixture of bitter irony along as the characters backstab each other, then ending worth a family scene that's awfully quaint.
Oh, money and dignity, what a dilemma as they cover luscious conflict, venture capital, product distribution, interpersonal issues and silly ghosts cackling in the background. That will be my first impression. Certainly, as the high-class life was this another's speciality.
Gift and talent wasted and then placed into a scripture for introspection, some serious adult parts in regard to politics there.
Have been going through the silver tides, Illuminated and Henry deliver a quick vision of a bounty hunter within an astral playing fields, and a betrayal of a heist.
How I like my fictional crimes. One that take a deep end, and a state of a contradictory protagonist that manages to make her movements of the spirt of wild justice. Francis Bacon said that:
WILD JUSTICE
What a name meant for a basic cathartic revenge plot, that leaves a bitter interpassavity. The moments of characters Henry manages of this project comes and goes and does not over-stay it's welcome being a symbolic character moments.
Spaceship, into the lands of mercy, and two plotlines interweave into a juicy noughaty centre of with the end. Recommended zine 🛋🍿 Can't go wrong with a action buster
A Tragic Bildingsroman, with the amount of lands that are moved
Now, what happens within the tensions of qualities of masculinity, and the way of a drowning kid of a traumatic negativism, are handled well here, only with the rise of the positivism along with the see-saw balance. Then it comes with a fake duplicity, with it centring around the prejudices of the environment.
It ends up with a crime and a murder that I did not expect, some have compared it towards Romeo and Juliet, I've compared it towards a more tragic tale of Brokeback Mountain. Heavy stuff.
With such a system that we live in, it's nice to see I see new ways of the council houses and the boxes of sweets along with certain promises that can happen with such mundane happenings.
Well, whatever happens at the end, an imprint of Scotland is made.
This one is a raunchier take with plenty of sex scenes (CW Suicide)
This has a lot of suicide ideation, so there's that. A sex worker within adult industries tends to claim that such pleasure performances are meant to be empowering. Then they are not.
So many sex scenes, too. From being a porn director, Grindr browser and traveller to Australia.
Then it hits with another meeting of sadness from moving into a friends family, with plenty of sad poetry, it's a sad gay thing of scandel
These were the collection of loose memoirs when it's an own way within western taxation systems, These have a better way of describing the virtues of boredom, along with the heroism of... accounting?
Well, such a system of managing debt and our own funny anecdotes, makes way towards the memoirs at then end, David Foster Wallace interrupting in the end to say his own fiction becomes un-fiction with his own story, admitting it as much. Then it's a fake auto-bio with odd sex jokes here and there that are scattered about.
Then it comes to the monopsony of sex appeal, that I've outlined above, economics theory intermingles that. Yet as things are told in a dry manner as David foster Wallaces dinjointed rambling bring a cohesive wholeness together in the ending, well, it's open-ended.
Guess these points are better than jumping head first within in infinite jest. That is a literary enigma, this one is a literary gem that's easier to understand the complexity.
Genre-bending! Coming to a new fiction towards you!
Crosswordism, a conciliatory epistemological framework of viewing the world for out philosophy, of complete true justified belief. Yet here we are, some of here essays are good, some of them are not. Regarding Neurlanaysis and the overwriting of very within the language.
I gravitate towards Stephan Jay Gould and the mismeasure of man, along with Delusions of Gender as authority sources of Cordelia fine in regard to that. (I'll have to reread it.)
I wanna leave phrenology to the academics, I'm an artist/entertainer first.
Nobody's perfect with my wabi-sabism, So I take a bit from there, a bit from that. Now, such a visualisation of 3-dimensional epistemology is a way of reasons and clues being evidentiary experiences. Wow, she does like paradoxes, as do I within my fiction.
Well, that's ambiguity, that's a way to approach an essay or a fictional work.
Later she critiques the further industrialisation with academia and that's reflected or the orderisation and packaging of student into products that's a simple way with SAT tests, that later is the golden lining that brings with topics. Ad agencies lines of thinking that Seth Godin that has thought, or that he has to seek.
Attorneys being representation of advocacy rather than scientist being that of the pursuit of knowledge. Along with other distinctions, if you ignore thing, she provides a good framework for paradoxes and a 3-dimensional way of seeing discourse.
Trippy, man. Things for the philosophy are to be questioned, nothing is safe, from copyright and curious questions, a lot of questions, and then there's answers.
One of the etymological definitions of authenticity is to murder, which is a curious interpretation. How words change. So many kinds, it leads you to mean your validation of opinion or idea, This is a type that leads into another one, the one of poverty and isolation with the flowers of the other kind. The Oxford definition is of something of a response to the enlightenment. Well, It could have epistemological merit, or a hacked exchange of monopsony
How it's a matter of self, with it being an illusion or not. Self that something in regard to pride of a body of work that's a matter of showmanship or not.
Trilling views it as a matter of conversation, towards an idea of pushing into a co-operative. Romanticism itself is an idea that's old, and not iconoclasm today. Since the idea of many a romanticism and now it's covered within the marketingese of brand and copywriting. Thanks Industrial Revolution.
Trilling continues with the liberal imagination, then continues to see if fiction can be political ( It is, it's by degree's of directness and warrant. )
I'll see if I can get to the liberal imagination, free away! Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Ira Levin has made a parody of making humans into robotic products succinct.
As with the creep of obedient worker robots obsessed with housework and obeying masculinity, welp, there's a feminine theming along with a dig towards how such a creep could be effecting others.
Chaos to Order here.
Chuck Palahniuks take with this creeping, status ( which shall be a neutral construct ), shall be the fun start of how this culture will have its impact. Even if it's remade commercial twice.
Nice touch on the monotony acting at the end, really strikes at the subtle horror of it.
Cough education industry complex. It's rote machinations, promising careers that lead towards no self-direction.
