Synoptic Reading, On Tech Relations.

What did we learn? From these ideas? Of the ongoing desire to build a metaphysical base. Of ideas/expressions and with all that.

For another blog post. Yet the liberals are bringing a knife to a gun fight. Even though I wanna criticise the conservative response, Nick lands accelerationism.

Here's me attempt to educate myself. This is an accumulation of all the tech relations with the classes.

The ones on LLMs are Ethan Mollick and AI snake oil. Yet it has lead to out with hustle culture.

(Are you a sociologist?!) Yes. Althusserian. Time to do honey instead of vinegar. Sooo, you wanna read audiobooks? 🛋️👉👈 

The first two audiobooks to intake with the Beep_Boop to intake platonically if you don't like the written word.

Ethan Mollick brings the latest news, While snake oil brings in the jagged frontier.

These are the ways of the jagged frontier, which means that I'll see a lot of cultural shifts and a lot of false polemics (mwurica) thanks didney, violence with boobies and moralising and high horsing and silly wonks.

These are the culture of the internet, and with big vertical integrated media sources move us. With how this internet functions for the technocapitalists, we go by now.

 

This is an account of the West and its response and the lack of stigma within China and other countries. It's like these two books are for understanding LLMs.

Harlen Ellison's chapter about pay toilets is worth adding. Attention merchants is understand how much direct response has shaped our culture. With the gift of the gift economies.

We are on the precipice of philosophies and disagreements. So yeah, enjoy the bumpy ride of the ragged frontier of Beep_Boop.

This one points it out.

B-b-b-bonus one the reading list.

On my reading list, the left is more bioessentialist; the right is of mental labour and our history. Regardless, I will challenge my ideological presumptions and see if they lead me into life-changing revelations. I don't think I'll be achronological in literary interpretation; now I don't think we ever were.

Wow, Abi's got African philosophy and a substack . with the rebranding, maybe it will move others away from the doomerist/miserablist

This one was on my feed too, to be decided. He may be wrong about the anthromorphic lawsuit though, IDK cannot entertain now.

"Sam Altman will hate it" Says within the promotional material. With all the venture capitalists going back'n forth. It'd be 

How did we get here with this polysemic tech?

Bbbbbbonus on this polysomic tech.

Can I have some otium?

Back at it again with the classical labour theory of value

Carenedes attempting to the a typology of work, even though art cannot fall under industrialised white collar work. More like Sport and play, will be keeping track. IDK what he'll say with beep_Boop

How to Read Like a Parasite by Daniel Tutt.

Resentment and otium of the aristocratic class.

This not a dive of an aristocrat or a nilosophy (Ni as in hate)

Yet with such concepts, there's a thing with resentment and the eternal return, which are conservative concepts that have made me think of the literature that I'm trying to reconcile and understand. They may have crept up; this document attempts to rehabilitate while also being western Marxism to a modern conception with Daniel Tutt bringing in other authorities like Byung-Chul Han.

With the attempt to bring the concepts on his YouTube channel and make it a thesis of trying to exploit the little niches of his thought and cynicism that was brought with meaning of religion, morality and all that jazz of not know his attempts with his past. With me listening to the conception of animosity that is made flesh.

I don't know if any of Nietzsche or as they call him an physcopath can be attached today, yet this was insightful. 4.5 stars.

Psycho Cinema by Helen Rollins

 

It's fun how theories of mind get updated and reiterated.

Apart from misinformation of LLMs and diffusion models on two pages (I'd recommend Nicolas d'Varrreal's A Soul of a New Type for the full epistemology). With collaboration, understanding this tech is possible. Daniel Tutt Interviewed him.

Pretty impressive using psychology and Freaud and Lack, including Hagel. I've seen such modes of thought as enlightening as I explore the manner of idea/expression. With that, such is the commencement of abstract and concrete making of the mind. It's nestled its way through multiple theories of over the political map and other ways that jigger around.

So this one is going the typical dialectical materialism manner of monistic creation. I do like to think mental states can be both independent and dependent, varying on the modes of production. So this fits with the idea that with a complement to the complement of film at the end, it's Slavoj Žižek's Perverts Guide to Ideology extra.

This is total independence with me at my workstation and wordplay right now.

On plot:Spectacle C.Dereck Varn

Memory of C.Dereck

This is a comment:

Being an entertainer, I can only find the concepts of Harlan Ellison's The Glass Teat inspiring to create literary entertainment. This concept aligns with Byung-Chul Han Cognitainment concept with my craft, I seek to make it into the creative commons. I can only assume our old copyright framework aids in this diffuse atomisation, like you said.

With all the cargo culting though.This may be the limits of our meliorism, granted with our social apparatus of these platform capitalists, left to our own devices to raise consciousness.

So I can only think of connection while still at the tension of these commodity relations as an edutainment creative class owning the means of production. Then carry on.

Seeing the normalised advertising and commodifying proffesion left to us, along with the subvertisement. The only thing on these platforms is locked within. It's arguable that with all this automated white-collar work now, it's going to first to go. It's a fascinating subject that came from aristotle of plot:spectcale, Robert Mckhee's argued in one of his craft books there is no distinction.

I guess we will have to move on with commodified para-social relationships from platform to platform. Thx for the talk, been doing my best to inform my praxis while not falling into the pragmatism traps.

More on entertainment, good and bad. I've read about:

Harlen Ellison's The Glass Teat 1+2 And his speech on toilets
Byung-Chul Han's The Good Entertainment > Those are goof
Robert McKee Character
Nicolas D Villarreal a soul of a new type

David Foster Wallace talk on consumerism > mid
The Attention merchants : Tim Wu

Neil Postman on Amusing Ourselves to Death and Technopoly. ( I don't know how long those ideas have lasted) >Negative

-

On Piracy, not on stipends or royality.

The anarchist zines happened, with all the contradictory ideologies along with the

Oh look, an anarchist zine library with all the points of disagreement, yet with preservation of knowledge like the Internet Archive. I'm not sure if I'm going to read them all, yet here it is.

I'm not even an anarchist. Given that these ideas are meant to spread, with my fair share of disagreements, it can get too anti-dom of a sort.

It's all research of a sort not fitting for a microblog. They do share a view of ip law abolition, though.

They may call me tankie, or that term, even though I identify as a hobby sociologist.

Notes on oversetext design course

. The meta of social media is the limit of the craft, with people copying conventional IP to thirstrap/tail at the treat. Is that what one of the polemical essays did? Try to highlight this cargo cult. The commercial illustration mindset!

Wow, banging on the factory settings was a great banger, with its polemics of the one-dimensional man of the standardisation of our consciousness.

The tyranny of the firm is one that's to be solved through other essays which deal with contract law and freelancers alongside that with the chokepoint of vertically integrated media.

The Nature of the Firm by RH.Course

Freelancers founded into a new venture should act more like enterprising firms; who'd have thun
k it.

The video explaining modernism and its polemical connotations was spot on.

Wonder what oversetect will be after I Post this? Regardless, I'll thank him for the list.

Byung First Impressions

Ironically, he ls the one to find merit in the term of entertainment, cogntaintment, and allotainment. Attainment that's required fore social interaction of the signifiers.

The Disappearance of Rituals

Good entertainment

Agony or Eros

Reaching out, for profit, to the non-profit affairs. With the ethics here being all up for interruption advertising with the status grooming and such. From the internal/attainment being from the dualistic that commercialised from advertising, and holistically defined within philosophy. Within such a matter, I'm not sure such rhetoric of porn going to be fully in light.

Should not point at Foucault. Oh well, I'm going to have to get a book for that one.

Chuck Palunuik's Snuff has an argument for the perverse incentives of the sex industry.

Book avoidance List 3

this link, hnm From the writer of the honest broker, or the writer which is a Christian
. It still exists in religion. I'm going to keep tagging around, and this post is inspired by it.

The Secret

" The law of attraction" along with that, placebo with misinformation and it cannot transcend cancer, apparently. These are the weird popular things recommended by a middle age to my teens that do not understand the world, yet offer a confidant solution of a network scam.

Such is the productivity of the neoliberal dream. BS

Seth Godin's Lynchpin

Most likely in the common sense of productivity advice, gotta take guts to be put on the recommendation and anti-recommendation! Wow, that's an effect that will not go away.

Mainly because his points are clarified better (if you ignore what he says within the east) in his song of significance as a art as a human resource, rather than body with his Taylorism rant, this was his attempt to bring his own ideas, yet it's all the rambling of the amygdala and lizard brain which is wrong btw.

Girl Wash your Face

(I'm not going to read this, going to have an opinion not based on evidence anyway.)

This is BS productivity, well, something that trusts the cynics attempt of the industry plant with high Disney production connection and end up proselytize, turning every moment into inspiration porn.

Ideally, avoiding this burn-out 'advice' (Heavy snarl quotes) Of a heavy short feedback loop of attention then back again, there's a churning nightmare of burn-out potential competition with toxic productivity, and it's all there is.

Having an abusive family is no excuse for suffering schedules. Well, my 2022 examination was thorough, huh? 

I'm linking this again, okay by (Can ignore the avast sponsership.)

GURRRRL, Rachel, have some Tea. 🛋

Status and Culture

 

Even out of the bounds of our epistemic enterprise of our academia, the main road's status motivations, and incentives still persists.

" Everybody is fishing for status, let nobody tell you otherwise " some Dragon Odendo, altered quote, probably. Well, Transcend, for that matter. By junction of there engagement. Social is the proceeding semiotic of economic, that's made of exchange value and set - price. Price, meant to stop haggling by the Quakers.

After the price and the exchange, there's the use value of the physics and mechanics of the things produced, artisan craft on the things of those who own their conditions of labour.

So Status, Rigour (sometimes that happens in academia, to and not.) Pretending not what other people do.

Status is a invisible ruler that effect to our micro decisions. From scarcity, to our abundance.

Other concepts i picked up 🛋📖 ( from the status book, author comes from fashiony background. )

Kitsch/Avant garde distinction

Epigone, in art of imitation, Exemplar by Immanuel Kant

Newmania:

Seeking the new cool thing on microblogs.

New = not exactly better, since to desire to see new entertainments via media.

Hysterisus :

Lagging behind in Greek, etymology. Used to describe another phenomena of trends in the data.

That's personal definitions n note. Possible to change.

Quite the sensation of how it's organised, with it being abstract of s

The wretched of the earth : a cautionary note on reactionary humanism

(I did the audiobook, I'm trying to remember my impressions.)

Reactionary Humanism, and Reactionary Essentialism

Dismissive self-abnegation and wanting to return to the mechanism of simple returns, masquerading as a humanistic drive is reactionary, sorry.

Humanism itself has served colonalist ends of a unjust hierarchy of state domination, as Franz Fanon states. Then we now the ideology is like any other, something we can lose faith into.

Recognition and resource distribution, under and over our with a just rule of law that determines our process. Will be in the evolution, not being bullies, and landlordism that this book describes. Such is the john lockean justification of seeing everything as a fronteir and private companys overlooking there negative externalities.

Well, scientific management of our attention, through body and intellect will be a slippery slope of doom. Humans along with its artifices. Not a doom I like.

Thanks for the Caution.

Materialist semiotics

Nice outsider art.

The beauty of our incoherence

Down to our linguistic beginnings.

Sememe, introduces new concepts that those most reductive concept of meaning. Along with its structuralism into a mindset of a wholistic splendour that I'm happy to delve in. Hopping from Lenin and Althusser and all those from the past of Marxist Leninism, it's certainly a dive into what it means to knowledge in post-llm era.

Such is today, as I've remained my sanity with Susan Haacks Foundherent Positivism/antipostivism synthesis, along with the criteria of the analogy of the crossword of figuring out a play of words to fit in within interpellated spaces, signifying meaning with the ways the lead into a holistic picture. So this book aligns with its knowledge, with the attempts to help bring a structuralist take on this new turn of events.

Casting down the singularity, while also brushing side the misrablism I see on microblogs.

Or, that's how it's seen, or what helped my soundness of mind with the LLM/diffusion provocateur wars between Musk/Sam Altman, with the forbidden fruit knowing a new framework that rejects of fundamental radicals (Except for the licensing ones) No fixedness with the sign and signifier, providing the structure of understanding an interpretation that fills the bowls.

So yeah, I did enjoy it, even at the little memoir at the end. There's little gems on the long tail of distribution like this. Do recommend.

Shadow Libraries Save em'

-

Look at those CLOWNS anti-ai wash academia most communist concept!

 Here's a link to the >> Shadow library Book << as you're reading. A call to protect the commons with 

This is the life, of our shared pool of knowledge in the commons to us.

Yet so to radicalisation (For all the wrong reason) are made to make sure it goes away by those who go I'm just doing my job to relatable/symbolic capital.

Radical Polarization, principled within a stereotype of a cartoon villain taking all art, regardless of the socioeconomic complexity. Along with the government, that's a matter beyond my comprehension of the way, with its interactions with copyright in Poland and the manner of environment. How decentralized platforms happen to work with regulation with the wall of shame, to the means of holding it with account to our civil autonomy. 

Now, we get to see that even with those who do and it's a long 4 day read.

The craft of natural sciences and the social, It's a prideful thing to be proud of.

Play/serious, the book of play

The essay on play/seriousness Fast/slow.

5 stars.

Play

Between Illusion and reality.

To move, and to stand still, Etymologically from the fast and slow.

The slow plot and the fast spectacle. We dance with it. I can see why it inspired my play though. Aristotle as the tension with all the aspects that make our minds dance with the matter of understanding how it constructs our society and civilisation.

This read left me with hope how a concept effects us, infrastructure and urbanism with the products of our capitalism and industrialism has given us many benefits and many liabilities. Advantages and disadvantages. Something in the back of our minds with eudaemonia, quality of life and the cost of living.

Guess that's the narrative mindset, leaving him with respect of our institutions and organisations From dispersion of tension to the creation of it, two poles. Moving us forward.

This is the video that inspired my reading.

( updated 2026 ) A plea for Beep_Boop Irenicism.

The Omni-bus of llm misinformation

refutations To respect Polysemy of a new age to end the dogmatic eristics.

This embarrassment of praxis ends here.

Historical dungeon and the Ai Dungeon before things where innocent.

(well earlier than that) Since computation has begun.

It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse-engineering accidents involving Dall-E.

A call for beep_boop preparationism. Or why I'm not an anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To end the ignorant assumptions, so I must dive into the double conciousness of the artisan class and see if there's a reactionary problem.

“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”- John Steinbeck

So the temporally embarrassed double-consciousness of the copyrighter of centralised reactionary media.

Then Twitter became X, and then a spectacle happened. The Disney happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it; now it's a mess. The trolls have become snobbified. Somthing open source nominally got labeled as anti-centralisation. A false base for dialectics is not a way to go for it to be anti-worker. Such is the bad epistemology that had lead to this to seep of the brute truth to power of the intellectuals and academics biting back to the entertainment industry.

Dogmatic Dialectics? Where does it go? Into the totality of the spectacle.

Mechanical optimism Dario Amodei, along with Doomerism examined

  Dario Amodei seems to be sick of the doomers, I am too.

Guess with AI visions, I'll leave with a positive note. Machines o
f loving grace

That's the positive aspects of ai. Biological pathogens being sorted along with the ways of lays being rigorously analysed, not seen and a foundation within discourse, only to test theories.

Really gives me hope, even though it's coming through anthropomorphic, well, I can converse now with capital. Big does not necessarily mean bad if it's governed well. We all can't be noble savages.

Greater wrong has written by Doomerism and it's shades, time for emoooooo.

I'm a little ennui frankly, myself. Yet these layers of the onions are the self-described doomers.

Yet the idea of robot overlords getting bored as I skimmed through my the mathematics as entertainment made me interested, yet that tells something more about me than. It's by @jdp.extropian.net What about this, and Intermingling with the LLM engineers now because why not, This is what happens when a journalist does takes and even citizen journalisms.

Can't broad brush all believers at this rate.

Enjoy those links in the doomer examinations, because I'm not clicking em, to confess.

Oh, Fresh Episode of The last invention is here. I'll be putting these under the Beep_boop to show how much editorials I've done on AI. Clambering for certainty with opinions to how to find peace of mind.

I mean, bonus lecture at the risks and assessments of the risks, even the one I've done with psychosis one.

Co-Int By Ethan

Beep boop, read my wires boy, read my robutt wires.

That's it! I'm reading a book because the copyright wingers using there existance on abolshing fair use are too much.

 So I decided to try to get my moneys worth via reading research in this discovery of llms/diffusion models.

(Even if it's bad, I've read Ayn Rynd, is this comparable? Part of the writer's training! HOOOOOOOOOO!) Lets see how much this fascinates or tires me.

2023
Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick

I've changed my opinion

Starts with explanations of weights, and token prediction. Existential risk and ethics, lawsuits, Japan, ethics discussion. This if it's all a matter of understanding what the tech can do in terms of capabilities and incapabilities is going to really have to see through.

These four rules are his tenets that he elaborates on for a possible alternative with dealing with the tech, how people hide, how people use it, and what are the possible sci-fi futures that move along it. Here's his Ai Research blog.

I shall put him in the neutral AI category and better-reporting-that-Ed-Zetron-box. I'm going to keep his machine inferences under wraps.

Guess this is under the editorial because somebody having a nuanced take on machine learning is impossible now with this naughty journalist seeking those hot, HOT scoops!

It's over-editorialised now, huzzah.

Oh, He's got a bullied by doomers, thankfully he has the way. Others have committed to comment, calling bluesky a containment containing all the tantrums.

That's my close to looking into a nuanced AI thinker.

Doomerist Cult This Black Box of Doom

Doomerist to the anti. I really like this book. 5 stars, Americana angst like Infinite Jest. Fully recommend.

It's the way that's the, Humiliation machine, of insecurities.

The scene of the drama coming from the phone and the tension between the drama inside the internet and then

Then all the doom'n gloom with the discourse of ai, woman, the world, and misery, all ending in a place that's most hopeful. Where all the characters are made to go through waves and then the ending of the legelese, mwa. Being a internet dweller, I have to get off with all this long tail of discourse that we all sit in.

Oh I'm rating books on goodreads now!

Deep Dark Fantasy, Kink Shadow Book

Abstract expressionism, it works again.

It claims to be a self-book, a horny one. A sadomasochistic spiritualism.

"Fear and desire are the same" 

Physch Book of bringing the energy of the tension of pleasure and pain.

Ty Gacha

Orgasmic meditation of an axiom, to be not tested, tries to develop from the law of attraction and calls out its contradictions, provided with finding dark parts of the subconscious and deciding to be at one of all the under-beings.

Yet all this antithesis and agonism of respecting ones subconscious dark side really sounds like good role-play, and it's all within the word play with the term meaning irreducible abstraction to the expression of a being that is shared with child and adult alike, it's the means that brings us together and provides the groundwork to a community.

Black and white, the conceptional distinction made to believe in the systems and metaphysical engines of our worlds.

While suggestion pleasure sessions of the darkest selves of anti-instrument to bring out the intrinsic parts then made to understand like some sort of vent comic, coming the most of existential part of the discovery of it all.

Discovery, that what this is, not fanciful invention.

It happens to dive into recommending a bdsm club too at the end, I can't really believe of the law of attraction though, and Carolyn puts here critique forwards, it's all about sexual exploration, such one can't get off made actualised of a discovery of another chapter of one's life.

Good stuff.

Subsumed by exchange Realism/nonrealism, Depressive Hedonism

 Guess this is a frank confessional on state-craft. Examining ideologies and then moving back into diplomatic entertainment. This will be the most labelist piece, and all these are not to be pressures as I circulate through the ideological forces around my time and place.

DIPLOMATIC ENTERTAINMENT, even that has contradictions, don't you see? Yet here we go with another narrativising pull. As a host! Yet State-craft opinion is something for those who never tire of it.

Play this while I type, shall we?

Defeatism, miserablism. And Depressive hedonism. Is that the way of this little book, recommended by Alex Avile? It is all, merely gothic, gothic materialism of fragmented self dwindling in the vastness. I dig it. I've had to ameliorate with looking into the darkness and bringing the stuff out of me.

There's a lot to appreciate here, If I can skip the talks of Stalinism/Marxist Leninism then it's pretty good of capturing the mass media cultish zeitgeist that predominates our lives as capital is made to social, then it's returned in that of a realist mindset as everything is reduced into an exchange value of such with all the gift ecomonys returning into a questionable mirage.

Everything to be bastardized I guess, Or what was Marc Fischer's goal of acid communism to come up with from such concepts to our ends and desires, of such drab material gothic ends.

Then it goes back again. Yet his quote "It's easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism" Wow, that draws an image within the cosiere circles. They're all hidden away within private accounts of twitter now, 2018 was a way to go.

Well, it certainly shines a light of my own pluralist tendencies and ideological presuppositions. Twitter feels like it's regressed, along with its containment unit of Bluesky, and I'm here, wondering the hours like it shall get along. I keep flipping back and forth of the principles of anarchism and Marxism scroll from the site as things draw around from confessional after confessional, it feels like I'll have to examine all the statecraft structuralisations and introspect.

Now there's tension between the Luddites and the accelerationists with that tension, I cannot relate to the Luddites any more due to the guild failure, since with my own confession like with Harlan Ellison, even guilds and unions can sell out.

Even as a drift on, I'm resonating with Neil Postman's and Mark Fischer's Accelerationist. One that is different, one with technology. Yet now, at this rate, We are to deal with such contradictions as of now.

Why, oh why, do I happen to come, where every artist justifies making money with Michelangelo and Shakespeare commercial plays, that the Mona Lisa was a non-profit project. Oh, such a complication.

1Dime, Badmouse, Finnishbolshevik (A little, one video on libertarian socialist rants), and Burn These books, Noj Rants. I keep reading these statecraft books. I'm not even as I can speak with authority as a drifting fabric on soviet historiography. Undecided as a ponder through, I've still got the society of the spectacle silently judging me as try to incorporate it within the fictional complexities of my artwork.

Thanks for reading. I'll get back to it. Along with the labelism. Your still going to get labelled anyway.

(Oh, and you're wondering why there cannot be between unity, I think of this by Badmouse, could not fully follow him when he left the ml space, yet with the time he's become a libertarian socialist. Welp, that's what ideological primordial souping does to you. Still like his electorlism, and baby vaush video minus the adultism.)

(I don't even watch Vaush, guess a lot of info has been revealed about him that Badmouse was incorrect about, oh well, that's truth value)

Neither Techonopoly of mediamonopoly (That's what copyright is btw, state-sanction monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us), It could be the with the right of the city and with being "A loving resistance fighter", or a diplomatic entertainer. So that we can move past such a pleasure principle and interpassive proconsumerism that we can see our own cycles.

Deep, man. Some concepts to take and give away, was he really pushing for a space-communism? Or was it meant

That's what these stream of consciousness happen though, hypocrisy naturally emerge, then with error theory they are naturally for a better collaboration. Or 'better' means monopoly/monopsomy.


Addendum:

(Further post-edit note, I'm not following Cory Doctorow much now, he's right on copyright yet this time to understand encrudificaiton, it has to go deeper than that when it comes to host service deterioration.)

Chuck Palahniuk as Editor

I'm doing these editor books as entertainment now, even if my training ain't going to be registered.

"World W**** three, Batman P***, Sign my D***"

"Writing has to be one of the loneliest professions in the world" Really chuck?

"You don't write to make friends" - Joy Williams (Within the weird plot/dialogue chapter I did not make sense off) Robert Mckee had a better book on dialogue.

He shares random, separate quotes, his bios with working with advertisers and writing is the most interesting.

Despite making edgy jokes and autism it feels mis aimed, it does not really feel that reactionary. It's selective with our ideas, as I did feel like what he's trying to come at from his perspective of behind an art's degree.

Maybe I'm jaded, though.

All ideas and public resonance with advertising being a crap shot, many does not know that Chuck was trying to compartmentalise reading David Foster Wallace along with other books and trying to process those feelings into a book of advice and going. "If you were my student"

He tends to go Respectability>Likeability within a character, that's where the character traits align of the patterns of the mode of a sympathetic Protagonist.

"Don't do dreams in developing tension" Well, David Lynch may have a disagreement with that. "It's my instructions I was taught" Okay Chuck.

3/5 first chapters

Next is the process. Ideation. Talks of piracy, talks of superheros doing inexplicably things with the comic writers, he's an unfriendly sort, yet you expect his ideation to travel and flow through.

Then at the times when it comes to the idea where he takes you, it's the most outlandish, off-the-wall ideas with his Hollywood formula which I'm most likely never going to follow, or maybe I do, if you've got your pattern-seeking eyeballs up.

Dirty entertainment book, maybe it will be used as reference, I'd prefer the Story Grid or Robert McGee.

What a dirty, dirty boook. DIRTY! Slap it with a rolled newspaper dirty!

3/5 still, pick'n choose.

(Oh, the best part was him dealing with hungry advertisers about not delivering enough eyeballs to the Superbowl, shows how advertisers of short-term and self-absorbed as they could not handle his character. )