Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
I've tried to put gender into my art, with it taking it seriously rather than an annoyance.
Oh Judith Butler, haven't read the others yet this one without the audiobook experience, and it's the anti-gender movement that's within the growing collective shout and other evangelical groups, this is a ideological dissection by an anarchist. (Expect the words authoritarian and totalitarian to be used here and there, although I don't think such of a meaning given my own position.)
It does get in the core clarification to sex/gender as a co-construction with Anna-Faust-Sterling, and it's the best part, along with shooting down how gender is an imperialist invasion made by the Vatican. Such a matter is a physio-semantic construction of not understanding what gender within the conservative groups. It is all but a phantasm.
Such is a matter to transition from fundamentalism to foundherentism in terms of epistemological structures that we are to see a shift from these ruling and attacks, from collective shout and the moral majority.
Alex avile and Abigail Thorn, two youtubers who have delves into such a matter for defending transgenderism. If you'd like the light version.
( Oh, and the note of the lack of literacy of those who have merely read the bible along with those who have seen YouTube videos is something to note with the audiences to this kind of regressive campaigning, some have only read the bible, some others read minimally. Others have circled with the books, so this bookspeculation. )
Wow, the writing of a queer sexworker and entertainer could have gone oxymoronic, it does not.
Marsha was killed, Marsha was persecuted, Marsh was into through hate. Through the stories of the Aids epidemic.
The beginnings of a hustler.
A hustler, that name was used complimentary here and not derogatory. Well, with my own baggage with the term. I guess, in the oligarchical logic of our term. That's merely another reflection of the westerns economic pressures that I can't happen to imagine yet feel sympathy for.
Emotional at the end of the contributions, with a redundant 'all rights reserved', don't worry, I'll tell my experiences. There were so many shades to an entertainer that brought to light as she dealt with the strife of the misogyny, transmisogony, and by the river.
What an effect it does have somebody, along with the law that ignore.
Tim Wu and all this way of thinking about attention and the such a way.
With our centre of attention, where it is being directed, where does it go? What will it do and what will define us. From our own ownership that's collective and personal, to our own means to stretching forth.
Julian Baggini's how to think like a philosopher. Had got me thinking that if things are analysed. His first chapter was on the matter of where the attention of distribution, which is easily measured today. Take note where the cues are coming over if certain argumentation is abstract and thought experimentation, there's a time and place for it, not here. ( I've still yet to read all his books on philsophy and paraphrase, it's my first impression. )
Well, Part of the organising strategy is to see if it could be invested or reinvested elsewhere.
Decide the centre of attention, the mise en place, decide on the future.
Structuralisations of scenes keep multiplying. This one weaves of a plan with etymologies and then into the narratologies with digression of strands and strings to boot.
Waves, cell-like, little ripples, meanders, spiral and explode, the world and historiography of our scene creativity is vast, with various risks to the status quo ante.
Such is our words defined by ideological, abstract foundherentisms. Our wisdoms and knowledge not set within a rigid framework of our history is to be expanded on our inexhaustible resources of our mind.
Shakespeare wrote the love was blind, that includes carnality.
Sadomachositic sexccessful fiction, did not know to feel pleasure or pain of these takedowns of the industry of sex we are facing. Portnoy being the oldest, snuff the latest. All from flawed villains except from the messy climax of Snuff.
Portnoy's Complaint
Now this is an embarrassing tale of bumbling excess or a confessional cautionary tale of sex flumps, ending with a psychological nightmare of being tried for such lecherous activity.
It ends with one of the most humiliating confession and woopsey self-pleasure accidents that's a brought to the typographic imagination.
Snuff
World *W***** Three*
What a situation of hang ups with a porn actress as the villian within this mini-plot of the actors having to deal with synopsis of each mini show of the industry, the place like becoming a pearl out of a cockle of an industrial stone heart.
This could be a critique of sexcess or the opportunistic contra dictionary glass house with entertainment, of course it's money the goal.
Great clownery, of all our ideas it's a clown show that ends in a painful amount of hyper-consumerism.
Here's a NSFW video on chucks view, and his response to the libertarian villain behind it.
28 minutes. What a twisted W****achry, love-hate, this must be a romance
As with all things with love'n sex, it can get complicated.
Y'know with the racist and sexist rants tied with a lust for money, with a voice of guttural sex and one of money, it's so recursive of this villain's desire for money it becomes like a broken record, money, money and money.
Everything is corrupted by profit accumulation here, as we do so under our own hypocritical licensing laws. Including the sluggish beast of the protagonists selves in sex and money. It all becomes a character study as an oil baron with the petrodollar, various sex workers and industries including with other confessions of a bigot of somebody who won't be on my Christmas card list.
Does nor exist, economists log off. There is the knowledge domain. What they ain't is a scarcity of knowledge. Such a scarcity with what is able to be searched today.
Such a dubious concept, along with the attempt of an intellectual monopoly and monopsony. As if thought can be controlled. Such a matter with idea's concepts and style that are too broad to be categorized with a thing.
This brings a division, on how these matters where tutors tell other artists to use reference, yet not when it comes to copyright, our that such a matter concerned with its own withering and the means to monetize.
These are the alternative laws with regard to displacement with others, with defendants can in regard to maximalism of licensing laws.
From Alix Aviles* second video.
Oh dear, looks like it's going to be a combination of AI and Copyright, yet with such licensing laws there's going to have to be a reimagining with them. Or circumnavigating them, as it merely will make fan iterations impossible.
Copying non-commercially was forever a practice within classical academics, I've done sight size method myself as a manner of teaching Copying were to mean to bring design patterns and their aesthetic axiologies into a new repeatably and consistency. Copying will help transform and merge
A scientist goes does deep down of the ideology of libertarian, western thought - pro capitalist thought left behind via Ayn Rand. Well, I could draw a line down there, Adam does not know how that from Steven Jay Gould and to the moment of our technocracy of yearning for a sense of control, a matter that transcends copyright and the licensing laws of the ownership to our attention and the control of it with our attentional facilities
That reminds me when it's comes to AI within the idea of making our own ideas with controlling the conversation, aiming for the outsider.
1:34 hours (Yeah there was criticism where the sponsor previously, yet welcome to the machine of entertainment that we live in. ) *Anywhere, here's the vid
That's curious, that was a different definition of accelerationist, (Maybe he's using a different definition which I don't hold. The direct action plan sounds well, though. Also with something off-base with certain sources such as Mark Fischers miserablism.
It's all.. Mild and inoffensive, though, all things considered. Even with the direct action strategy.
Yet the legal battle, I can't really join in that circus.
(This one is on my to-read list, so many on the bucket list.)
Tom scott also did a video in regard to other work
Patricia also did a video in regard to understanding the licensing laws. It's not going to be easy.
Well, imagining other means such as a right to the city and other means of direct action is a anarchist methodology of accomplishing that's also suitable. Also, the handshake deal that is taken for granted. Such as a simplicity on that with a written agreement.
The copyright industry complex. Urgh. Why are so many willing to die on that hill?
Has our licensing laws every been pro-worker? Look at those perverse incentives.
As with the naturalistic reductionists with what happened with religion, so will there be a trend with our own licensing laws. What I also dislike about this reductionism that it reduces all aesthetic energy to how much will commodify it, the get-rich-and-famous contract. Something wiggling inside me is telling my that's not art.
So, to confirm.
LLM and Diffusion models are remixing tech that's mindless and iterative to our designs. Only through the deal that ain't contingent of NDA's and several escrow payments and paperwork, we could do work or anti-work that makes a difference.
Thoughts...
My editorial:
I tend to prioritize fraudulent behaviour than ontological perfection of IP/Copyright. John Lockian property rights are a liberal conception that can lead into petty sport of the printing press. (Even John Locke opposed monopoly, btw)
I don't like either the diffusion model training data and copyright. It's catnip to industrialists because they are about faster and cheaper product.
I'm currently doing more journalism within the legalese stuff, this gets quite
editorial and even into political and economical matters. Never underestimate the simple, direct transaction over complex.
Since property rights are easier to argue from an industrialist due to capital, it's only a matter of not playing their game. Only a different game and system that the independent not dependent of the commercial industry.
( Oh and if they decide to content ID this article on Goofy being incredibly hot, they erm I guess I told you so. Guess entertainment ain't an amorphous blob. ) Guess I'll have to preserve it here for great justice.
I guess this is a matter of taking a deep breath. Along with focusing on the main struggle. I guess that's enough of this hornets nest of da industry.
Well well well, it's political science books to varying degrees of success as couch gregor must editorialise then into
Befriending capital to move along with it, I guess.
So what is it with the economy. Good enough to introduce others into the economy and seeing a refutation of freakonomics.
It's time for Couch Gregor to attempt to articulate a thoughtful comment on complicated socio-economic issues with vulgarising into a simplified sex jokes.
Frugality and house management or so the word means, scarcity is also another word for economy.
Oh, look it that, there is the talk of UBI, I'm not a fan for the purposes of this world. Even though there's the example of Canada and Africa, Since it's such a libertarian concept already, I'd prefer welfare'n benefits. Yet such a structuralisation of policy is beyond my scope of this.
Good for beginners including knowing the money and capital that they will have to learn eventually in financial management, yaaaaaaaaaaay.
Industrial usage of efficiency and convince, used as an adjective by advertisers This may be the case used over quantifying everything and trusting economists too much
Reminds me other this audiobook, Americanised, unfortunately. Yet it takes all the challenges of carving up a piece of capital for oneself, well shifting it into a public is a matter of thing that's meant to be dragged as she mocks small business and other intuitions with other executives, then she goes into the way of equitable business.
Why is it like Bioshock that a liberal gets to dunk on a libertarian, annoying anarcho-capitalist philosophy of infinite free market?
This is a book that shows that the free market does not exist, well, well then. Even if you may disagree with a lot of other opinions and nuances, I can't help but giggle to push another kick.
I'll attempt to be spoiler-free, this one is where the ways happen with fiction writers will be more understood.
What happens to a land of magical gangsters, heritage and the higher classes along with the desire of going through the pretentions of genius, talent and merit.
Meritocracy as a satire first, then taken in odd sincerity by pundits are taking in stride here.
Yet it's all a hall of mirrors as there is a mixture of bitter irony along as the characters backstab each other, then ending worth a family scene that's awfully quaint.
Oh, money and dignity, what a dilemma as they cover luscious conflict, venture capital, product distribution, interpersonal issues and silly ghosts cackling in the background. That will be my first impression. Certainly, as the high-class life was this another's speciality.
Gift and talent wasted and then placed into a scripture for introspection, some serious adult parts in regard to politics there.
Have been going through the silver tides, Illuminated and Henry deliver a quick vision of a bounty hunter within an astral playing fields, and a betrayal of a heist.
How I like my fictional crimes. One that take a deep end, and a state of a contradictory protagonist that manages to make her movements of the spirt of wild justice. Francis Bacon said that:
WILD JUSTICE
What a name meant for a basic cathartic revenge plot, that leaves a bitter interpassavity. The moments of characters Henry manages of this project comes and goes and does not over-stay it's welcome being a symbolic character moments.
Spaceship, into the lands of mercy, and two plotlines interweave into a juicy noughaty centre of with the end. Recommended zine 🛋🍿 Can't go wrong with a action buster
A Tragic Bildingsroman, with the amount of lands that are moved
Now, what happens within the tensions of qualities of masculinity, and the way of a drowning kid of a traumatic negativism, are handled well here, only with the rise of the positivism along with the see-saw balance. Then it comes with a fake duplicity, with it centring around the prejudices of the environment.
It ends up with a crime and a murder that I did not expect, some have compared it towards Romeo and Juliet, I've compared it towards a more tragic tale of Brokeback Mountain. Heavy stuff.
With such a system that we live in, it's nice to see I see new ways of the council houses and the boxes of sweets along with certain promises that can happen with such mundane happenings.
Well, whatever happens at the end, an imprint of Scotland is made.
This one is a raunchier take with plenty of sex scenes (CW Suicide)
This has a lot of suicide ideation, so there's that. A sex worker within adult industries tends to claim that such pleasure performances are meant to be empowering. Then they are not.
So many sex scenes, too. From being a porn director, Grindr browser and traveller to Australia.
Then it hits with another meeting of sadness from moving into a friends family, with plenty of sad poetry, it's a sad gay thing of scandel
These were the collection of loose memoirs when it's an own way within western taxation systems, These have a better way of describing the virtues of boredom, along with the heroism of... accounting?
Well, such a system of managing debt and our own funny anecdotes, makes way towards the memoirs at then end, David Foster Wallace interrupting in the end to say his own fiction becomes un-fiction with his own story, admitting it as much. Then it's a fake auto-bio with odd sex jokes here and there that are scattered about.
Then it comes to the monopsony of sex appeal, that I've outlined above, economics theory intermingles that. Yet as things are told in a dry manner as David foster Wallaces dinjointed rambling bring a cohesive wholeness together in the ending, well, it's open-ended.
Guess these points are better than jumping head first within in infinite jest. That is a literary enigma, this one is a literary gem that's easier to understand the complexity.
Genre-bending! Coming to a new fiction towards you!
Crosswordism, a conciliatory epistemological framework of viewing the world for out philosophy, of complete true justified belief. Yet here we are, some of here essays are good, some of them are not. Regarding Neurlanaysis and the overwriting of very within the language.
I gravitate towards Stephan Jay Gould and the mismeasure of man, along with Delusions of Gender as authority sources of Cordelia fine in regard to that. (I'll have to reread it.)
I wanna leave phrenology to the academics, I'm an artist/entertainer first.
Nobody's perfect with my wabi-sabism, So I take a bit from there, a bit from that. Now, such a visualisation of 3-dimensional epistemology is a way of reasons and clues being evidentiary experiences. Wow, she does like paradoxes, as do I within my fiction.
Well, that's ambiguity, that's a way to approach an essay or a fictional work.
Later she critiques the further industrialisation with academia and that's reflected or the orderisation and packaging of student into products that's a simple way with SAT tests, that later is the golden lining that brings with topics. Ad agencies lines of thinking that Seth Godin that has thought, or that he has to seek.
Attorneys being representation of advocacy rather than scientist being that of the pursuit of knowledge. Along with other distinctions, if you ignore thing, she provides a good framework for paradoxes and a 3-dimensional way of seeing discourse.
Trippy, man. Things for the philosophy are to be questioned, nothing is safe, from copyright and curious questions, a lot of questions, and then there's answers.
One of the etymological definitions of authenticity is to murder, which is a curious interpretation. How words change. So many kinds, it leads you to mean your validation of opinion or idea, This is a type that leads into another one, the one of poverty and isolation with the flowers of the other kind. The Oxford definition is of something of a response to the enlightenment. Well, It could have epistemological merit, or a hacked exchange of monopsony
How it's a matter of self, with it being an illusion or not. Self that something in regard to pride of a body of work that's a matter of showmanship or not.
Trilling views it as a matter of conversation, towards an idea of pushing into a co-operative. Romanticism itself is an idea that's old, and not iconoclasm today. Since the idea of many a romanticism and now it's covered within the marketingese of brand and copywriting. Thanks Industrial Revolution.
Trilling continues with the liberal imagination, then continues to see if fiction can be political ( It is, it's by degree's of directness and warrant. )
I'll see if I can get to the liberal imagination, free away! Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Ira Levin has made a parody of making humans into robotic products succinct.
As with the creep of obedient worker robots obsessed with housework and obeying masculinity, welp, there's a feminine theming along with a dig towards how such a creep could be effecting others.
Chaos to Order here.
Chuck Palahniuks take with this creeping, status ( which shall be a neutral construct ), shall be the fun start of how this culture will have its impact. Even if it's remade commercial twice.
Nice touch on the monotony acting at the end, really strikes at the subtle horror of it.
Cough education industry complex. It's rote machinations, promising careers that lead towards no self-direction.
Welcome to the internet where everything is computational, where illustrators become into the fan service industry complex.
Postman then undertakes his own view in where have religious matters into the world of scientist and another's from another viewpoints from western society.
He gets to the nitty gritty of how a shifted the patterns. Pales in comparison to amusing ourselves to death with his points of Bread and Circus. A shift, into our understanding. Of qualitative and quantitative over everything else, from the technocrats view. From the shiftless view.
It ain't that simple, though.
It can't translate into religion, sociology and the fictional entertainment works. How its mis detects illiteracy as mis-computations. Why the direct response can't be the answer, measurement not everything. Drawing on the sacred/profane distinctions.
Some sources and others are, historically wrong and in the wrong place, has a loving resistance fighter end though.
Thats his idea, not sure if he understands it fully though.
Aaaaah, inspiration p***, you can't help those hot showers even though they are selling is merely control. This
Except being picked by a system is not what this is about, it's altering it, of bending societal control. Well what is called strategy, be patient, such a simple concept explored in multiple riffs which is to be accepted.
First, gotta give thanks to Seth for making me start this blog, there's no denying he works for investors within a b corp. Yet it's certainly a good placebo, as he describes. Even if it may not influence my thinking, the internal story feels like a dazzle.
His thinking of blueprints, feedback loops and the way of business models and leverage are all well and good, stuff they should teach freelancers within entertainment to help watch their business. He repeats his famous blog posts, and it reads like a string of unconnected blog posts, little snippets of thoughts for the uninitiated, this is a style you're going to have to get used it.
It's a morale booster, yet that's all it is. Enough to control the work schedule, out of all of it could be negatively categorised a self-help from the era of salesmen and it's hacks. I'd recommend Seth's Godin The Practice, and his entire free podcast series to figure out your own opinion. There's still learning to be had, be aware of the baggage, as much as part as I bring mine.
There's always going to be a societal need for this, given how much the lands are filled with swindlers in this day and age.
Already he went from those suspicious rags-to-riches stories regarding apple, which is a point against the book. Claude Ai too, meeeeh. Haven't needed to use it to clarify my thoughts.
Oh, and intuitionism, stuff not written down and systemised will always be part of business models, it's about transactional attention that of the service industry. Till it's outlived. A bit too much scientism and unsympathetic for the concept of revolution. It all feels like a CEO point of view may have overtaken him, he does his best to try to hide it though. Goes into the last part with talks about the free market (Which flew right past my head) then onto talks of a carbon tax and with community action.
"Entrepreneurship is like one of those carnival games where you throw darts or something.
Middle class kids can afford one throw. Most miss. A few hit the target and get a small prize. A very few hit the centre bullseye and get a bigger prize. Rags to riches! The American Dream lives on.
Rich kids can afford many throws. If they want to, they can try over and over and over again until they hit something and feel good about themselves. Some keep going until they hit the centre bullseye, then they give speeches or write blog posts about “meritocracy” and the salutary effects of hard work.
Poor kids aren't visiting the carnival. They're the ones working it."
When will this non-profit business last? Until I die. Afford what you can to avoid the ad creep.
Fair share of disagreements and agreements entering within the commercial field.
See you for the next book you'll publish, Seth. These will all be added into the syncretic domain. Nothing like getting bashed with the same marketing rules over and over till something clicks, ah, those on-the-nose themes.
Did he use AI for the bookcover? Oh gosh, the paranoia has got me.
As with my dabbling with languages, terms come, expressions neologised as concepts crystallise, reflecting "in terminology" of yesteryears. Moving on with Heteroglossia.
Weaving the linguistics, from Arch-genre, to Sub-genre, to various stages, to the formation of our meanings and back again, it's a literary marvel to behold.
With that of the meta-in-of-itself that can defy any generality and specificity. Such a means of commercial editing shows that show which to either capitalise on attention and their hold.
What concepts, what ideas, what stuff no copywriter can uphold. Yet, with me and others being the enlightened within discursive circles. This is why the literary entertainment could be the highest form, which will always be better. Nothing is that memorable from that quick-shot place of dopamine culture.
Sure, whether these concepts will funnel towards are fictional entertainment, retaining into concepts of our culture is another matter. It's certainly been a fine, literary dive.
Such terms of sociological understanding, Even though the concept of the horizon of expectations will be needing its out post of understanding. Despite it sounding like a final fantasy villain.
Well, ignoring the Orwellian normalised speak (Double-think? Double-Talk? Merely call them paradoxes or thought-terminating clichés.), this is honest reporting on a phenomon that is distinctly western.
Infinite opportunity, Endless chain, pay to play, Recruiting Mandate, Bottom-To-Top. Travelling to what a swindle within a salesman of cons and it's hacks. It's merely into the epitome of the specification of entertainment, to the human's as exploitable product, and to be made to follow and dancey jig. Scientific management, into this.
Or resource, managed to be exploited more and more into empty sinks line with perverse incentives, now that's a thought.
Same music, same old jig of the times that were happening to the atheist movement that occurred with this, mlm-fication of certain 'friend' groups of attention deposits. Where the return ain't going anywhere if one ain't treating it like a business.
When Robert takes from eastern figures such as Hannah Arendts again, I don't think I expect much. It's the reporting to apply it within the fields of these bad 'business' models. (It ain't a business model, it's a cult of money going into a black hole, made by dishonest betrayal and the hackneyed 'exscuse' of selling a product.) The Cult masquerading as a Profit-making venture is the negation of the negation in regards to logical success.
He had a run with the syndicate and then did two series as a showrunner at Hollywood, with the conclusion of “Don't quit your day job.”
It really shows the political entertainment, for better or was being a product of it's time, with the effort made to capture 2000's suburbia. One that leads from peace to gags made of demand. He aimed his entertainment at the people of colour.
When your themes are political and on-the-nose by design, you jump in head first without many paradoxes. Into the fray of the experiences of the time, and then out of it. This is more symbolic in its portrayal of the arch-types envisioned. It's part of the territory. You f around and found out being an iconoclastic with that being a brand (or anti-brand brand,) then deal with the controversies.
The better controversies, stuff that can change the culture for the better. Likes talk of copyrighted content and the stuff happening within the war, over the commodified entertainment, the industries and yet-another-electorlism take.
Stuff that won't go into full, again, it's part of the territory of such a contradictory position, he did is best. "artists that are allowed to do what they do for the point of view to make something worth consuming" or as he'd say.
He tried to process his anger through the gags. Through the artwork that have been crammed through the crunch and unrealistic deadlines at the end of the fourth season. Let it stand the test of times of the discussions of art that challenges audiences.
Byung Chul Hans book, The burnout society. is a book on essay.
Self-exploitation, normalised and taught with victim blaming along with the uselessness. More concepts to be made into the mindset of a dismissed philosopher.
Such names like Nietzsche, Hannah Arendt, and Foucault are brought in. Yet this is a reaction, a constructive reaction to the self-help industry complex. Stuff that Seth Godin wrestles with.
Yeah, I hate it with all my heart with when a Professor/influencers that teach their students with 'professionalism' 'passion' 'down the line' in attempt to normalise overwork and overtime. There's a reason that it's not natural within law to not extend over it.
Anybody contributing it will move towards the downfall of society, from Ninja crying about it (with him still getting a commercial book deal, I don't look at his fanboys because I'll lose faith in humanity.)
The average user treated as a product for the these lying lifestylers swindles may be fooled for exploited overtime, anybody with experience who knows who to work for though, will leave and brain drain for better working conditions.
