- La Resistance independent -
- Report start -
So what's your opinion on emerging tech? On LLMS?
Your incredibly opinionated manner you himbo waltz into
The due diligence for your [ Perfect coherent interpretation here ]
That's most divinely reconciliatory.
Okay serious. Disclaimer this had fair use/fair dealing with attribution.
Short answer: My position is sociologically with the epistemics of Susan Haack, Henry Ferrel, Abi Awomosu, aesthetically with Masamune Shirow, intepretability from Matteo Pasquinelli. Discard the malpractice didney lawyers with culture war kruft. Digi-ethics research is like that within OSS and academics. Para-academically I go.
This sentiment makes me a defensive accelerationist affiliated with the Cosmo's institute and Audrey Tang. Yet, I rather create a new label, coining it a cyberfoundherentist!
Reading this essay and coming to your own conclusions with the overall thing. Since I'll cover all the philosophical positioning and typology.
This has a guide of the technopolitical factions within and terminology
Utah has the Microblogging factions too.
If you want more typologies, You can pick the tribes of silicon valley to find your relation within Tech relations, here's mine.
This sentiment makes me a defensive accelerationist affiliated with the Cosmo's institute and Audrey Tang. Yet, I rather create a new label, coining it a cyberfoundherentist!
Reading this essay and coming to your own conclusions with the overall thing. Since I'll cover all the philosophical positioning and typology.
This has a guide of the technopolitical factions within and terminology
If you want more typologies, You can pick the tribes of silicon valley to find your relation within Tech relations, here's mine.
Medium Answer:
This by Alice
It's a mixed review of the various critics of the venture capitalists and brings it's own conclusion of a solapunk/scrapunk. Garrison Lovely has a decisive take on Ed Zitron. I've had my own commentary with that model collapse.
Karl Mark and the german idealists have it. A free Article on it. About the essaykin of automation/augmentation. This is the long line of left techno progressives to technomehists < (I maybe one of them) On seizing the means of productions
Along with Pure Koors videos for the furries
Now, time to right-fit your taxonomy of this ongoing technopoltic.
This by Alice
It's a mixed review of the various critics of the venture capitalists and brings it's own conclusion of a solapunk/scrapunk. Garrison Lovely has a decisive take on Ed Zitron. I've had my own commentary with that model collapse.
"Most AI debates aren’t really about evidence. Instead, they’re arguments about futures that none of us have seen.
Nobody has seen superintelligence, a machine that most people agree is conscious, or a fully automated economy. Evidence can be gathered, but it underdetermines the conclusion. To fill the gap, we fall back on a combination of philosophy, political intuitions or, in some cases, tribal identity."
Karl Mark and the german idealists have it. A free Article on it. About the essaykin of automation/augmentation. This is the long line of left techno progressives to technomehists < (I maybe one of them) On seizing the means of productions
In a marxist sense, even if I don't subscribe to it.
Along with Pure Koors videos for the furries
Now, time to right-fit your taxonomy of this ongoing technopoltic.
Long Answer:
Welcome, sceptics and hyper-believers. Or those who believe LLMs are Ontologically evil. 👋🛋
Refutations to respect polysemy of a new age to end the dogmatic eristics of a fantastical boycott. Of vulgar critical theory 💪🛋⭐ So with it, the social tech.
The intellectual case. Away from the prosumer
metrology outside.
This embarrassment of praxis ends here.
To the end of the art hall monitors with their false historiography. To point a finger at the AI denial industry too.
A doxastic space this blind dogma ends here. Couch Gregor is angry. 🛋🔎 He'll do an investigation.
With Gags. Then, like Ghost in the shell illustrator, you'll know his position.
"But Couch Gregor, what do you mean you with the code word draw buff dudes
in tho-"
From the past, this was done before within this paywalled essay
~
To the note Dario Placed a note in the race
"It’s an important historic document — something that should end up in the Museum of How We Got Here, when the robots get around to building one — and I think it’s useful to hear how Amodei, now the CEO of Anthropic, developed his conviction in scaling. If AI transforms society the way Amodei thinks it will, documents like these may be the equivalent of Darwin’s notebooks, and I think there’s a strong public-interest argument for letting people read them. (Note: the full document runs to more than 25 pages. I am publishing only the first 10, since the rest is very dense and technical and consists mainly of Amodei arguing with various other AI safety researchers about why their suggested approaches are wrong.)"
Yes Kevin, I will go down to the dogmas that are presupposed with their precious, oh precious entertainment. Trivially true into the future.
(okay cool it Kevin)
is its useless/useful? Valueable/worthless? Model/medium?
Whatever valence to put [derogatory slur] or [laudatory commendation] of linguistic coding? Polysemancity!
🛋🔎🔎🔎
It's polysemic. Orthagonal. A big splotch
is its useless/useful? Valueable/worthless? Model/medium?
Whatever valence to put [derogatory slur] or [laudatory commendation] of linguistic coding? Polysemancity!
🛋🔎🔎🔎
Look at all those Cartesian maps! Andy Masley bottom and Tree of Woe bottom right.
It's polysemic. Orthagonal. A big splotch
on the political map!🍅
So a go-go with non-expert couch Gregor.
A Social Tech that Henry Ferrel will say
So a go-go with non-expert couch Gregor.
A Social Tech that Henry Ferrel will say
Historical dungeon and AI Dungeon before things were innocent.
(well earlier than that) Since computation has begun.
It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse-engineering accidents involving Dall-E.
all of it was simple before
A call for beep_boop preparationism. No dog in the race. To end the ignorant assumptions, I must dive into the double consciousness of the artisan class. To that, with the couch gregor explains his multiple poistion.
Then a naughty publicity stunt.It began.
Then after Alexander Avila, I'm like, why are we fighting? This factionalism or fandom had started. This is leading into a second-opinion bias encouraged by social media.
“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. ”- John Steinbeck
So the temporally embarrassed double consciousness of the copywriter/graphic designers of centralised media.
Then Twitter became X, and then a spectacle happened. The Disney happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it; now it's a mess. The trolls have become snobbified. Something open source nominally got labelled as anti-centralisation. A false base for dialectics is not a way to go for it to be anti-worker. Such is the bad epistemology that had lead to this to seep of the brute truth to the power of the intellectuals and academics biting back at the entertainment industry.
We must have a discussion about this.
Decentralization and automony.
and I've had my investigations. My labels will have come and gone nominally.
Now that, as a preparationist, I suggest you hold onto your cushions. This one is going beyond the Ed Zitron, and Cory Doctorow.
