on the lindy effect

The Lindy Law

Reading self-help advice of crafting crafter for craft. The way of the meta of meta. Self-referential.

WITH NO OWNERSHIP Welcome to the creative commons. Are you surprised?

So much intake of consumption of content with the way it's like it's got that way. Industry complex of condescension on the front page, or am I looking at the mindless entertainment in infront of the front page?

This is the best the place has to offer.

Then you have to protect your attention.

Then with manners it goes. To look in the other places.

Abstract/Concrete

All the abstract mentalities, of ideas and non-reality, and all the physical reality. To the amount we take, there are few qualitative degrees that warrant selection.

The physical expression and the ineffable idea/conception stuck within one's head. Unable to be expressed until it hits.

There's that design, with the idea made into a digital and analogue expression.

With that in mind, such a way of trying to squeeze blood from a stone is the dialectical approach that happens.

Oh, thinking and reflecting on the idea/expression dichotomy.

Cruelly Eliminativeist and cruely Empiricist

look at all that logic and physics of what some may call business. if there is a physics to business, there is none in the qualitative side, or the burnt embers

Why I'm against it: it's not fun not having beliefs and sensations.

Crafting crafter of craft. Rather than the unique one. To the way that the origins of things aren't unique.

All that scientism is any ideological commitment and an attempt at universal appeal. Mindset of a production boolean value.

A job of bean counting. A job is a measure of the sunk cost of wrong measurement, of Pavlovian frameworks circulating into themselves.

Such is the status of old money and cool money.

Honest hacks vs depressed hacks

Depending on the socialised means of production. The artisan city/suburban dweller class.

It's work of art/entertainment paradox working here.

I'm going to twist this post by Seth and Harlan Ellison it up.

There are the vendors who will listen. Hits, specs. These are easy-to-work-with entertainers. Able to connect with.

Then there's the depressed one who hits the spec, yet feels rote. These could be talents. 

I mean, that's the difference; the artisan is a creative with tension in the craft.

The craft itself of the depressed feels rote and standardised. These could be tantrums as performances.

An honest hack entertainer delivers on times, understands specifications, yet can go beyond the mechanical performances of eliminative materialism and then attempt an organsim to delight with something remarkable with the client relationship,

What is the best craft for the illiterate?

What is the best heuristic that respects Occam's razor more likely? Or the deflationist's first impression of creating the finest grape juice? The highest artificially

Appealing to the short, illiterate feedback loops of erotic perversions for the sake of it.

Then there's the logograms, of not exaggerating the exaggerated, to not lead into hyperbolic messages.

Well, the simple first impression does make sense with the direct advertiser it's making that way.

Simple front impressions.

Bip bip bip.

On vulgar Auteurism, Vulgar style/genre

Kyle Kallgren likes to be the critic of literary auteurs. Or the art director/producer running the show and their vision.

Yes, even with style, even with genre, one can still be bad.

Axiology does not care about the legalese pf
the front cover, the performance the the resonance which follows after, beyond the natural law.

So that from court of law to public. It remains the distinction of low and high still. It can be suspended to serve plenty of stimulation.

Or YOU TEARING ME APART!! LISA WITH SYMBOLIC JUSTICE

video 🔻🛋 on the best/worst over-distributed vanity film. In the spirit of Robert Mcghee. Of the spectacular production and the founderent manueavuring through the industry. Deproffesional within the social media.

(Wonder where Kyles video will be next? I don't follow him.)

Notes on oversetext design course

. The meta of social media is the limit of the craft, with people copying conventional IP to thirstrap/tail at the treat. Is that what one of the polemical essays did? Try to highlight this cargo cult. The commercial illustration mindset!

Wow, banging on the factory settings was a great banger, with its polemics of the one-dimensional man of the standardisation of our consciousness.

The tyranny of the firm is one that's to be solved through other essays which deal with contract law and freelancers alongside that with the chokepoint of vertically integrated media.

The Nature of the Firm by RH.Course

Freelancers founded into a new venture should act more like enterprising firms; who'd have thun
k it.

The video explaining modernism and its polemical connotations was spot on.

Wonder what oversetect will be after I Post this? Regardless, I'll thank him for the list.

No lock on traffic/circle of platforms

So that with our systems, with the distribution of moving and going into the way of life.

The back and forth of the fundamentals of platforms can't be traced back, a series of direct responses that lead towards.

This is the leap, or the other jump into another platform that happens with another line of work. Getting into a village of our own ways to make sense of this hybrid of tensions along with the domain of knowledge and the affiliations.

There's no fixed point anymore, no fixed credentialism.

So it begins again.

Curate = direct response

Simple observation, yet goes unnoticed on a micro-level.

Everybody online wants to be curated, want to be selected, yet nobody wants, from the entering in the arena of social media.

Then this extremophile place where they act like the celebs they want, to the informal or formal curation, the matter of what.

The only place to escape the rhetorical centre is to do it personal and not post. The right to be forgotten can't escape these bounds.

You can't be better than the form, the respect of it.

Now that's constraint and framing.

On Tyranny of convenience, the reassurance machine

This thing (Other than notes of net neutrality, which I covered. )

Abstract expression with meat grinder doodle

Is this where the regular kind of our ideas.

Boring =/= Trivial

Regular

Mediocre

Standard

Normal

Non commodity fetishised

Mainstream

Specification

All those things indicated a matter of day expressed to be somewhere normalised of oughtiness of little moral judgements of the day become a code of ethics followed and into a way of life. 

Well

Such a matter is what we're dealing with tech that can become something of a quick utility monster fix.

Now it's time to not be contingent on the utility alone. With excuses with that.

Recognizing (From Kant) The external and internal and vital conceptual distinction of consciousness is necessary to understanding. Well, Is there a distinction for the commodity and the fetishised.

Not the body fetishism, the most profitable that a rhetorical error.

Pacta Sunty Sevanda a deal is a deal

 When the publisher who had bound by the firm fiction, and is bound to serve the individual freelancer with a contract that will ensure distribution of the metrics.

Then the deal has been readjusted again, with self-publishing slush pile, yet more slush piley

Guess it's time to understand this game, or status game, anti-status game, or status game collapse. 

Well, well, even with this cussy article brought to new values of reassemble the most simple governmental factors to plays.

anti-synth-work

Work giving labour to another or to yourself, physical or cognative.

Yet the netural, it happens, with the schedule wether it goes or not.

Even with this one.

The performance continues.

With each tip of typing this, the montony and banality of a copywriter one once where unfurls the a moment of yearning for connection.

Then it returns in of itself.

Tautolgys sticking, tautolgys going.

The perks of obscurity

It's all a blur, so many little content curation and moderation being what is sold, all in an expanding universe of vendors and suppliers with all their advertising, all a blur, all the fandom/hatedom, all the time, all of it was going in a blur of media heads down the way.

Academics are avoiding xwitter, or microblogs, some of them are in substack, they are going there, I found a good post on obscurity.

Since it's all datum, observable of the lowest stratum of comprehension, the scientific, and the narrative of this is to study, or when with a monopoly/monopsony of attention. Fame/infamy explains the entitlement complex of status value and cultural capital.


There's little attention. No data for interupption advertising.

No Ruthless expose industry complex, the need to make dramatic fiction to draw attention.

Thousands of merchandise, gone.

Fan fictions all around. Shippers, and all that.

No Status value to follow.

Cherish this moment while it lasts, I trust you, don't I?

( Oh, I've still have to learn to do a sales call, and a payment specification. )

What did Zig Ziglar, a conflict avoider, says with the data generality and a meaningful specific? Or, a semiotic specific in a chain.

If you know, you know, sex work vendors/suppliers governance

There was this cartoonist who did this graph, this is from memory of digital dreams.

Yep, NSFW do get paid better in extrajudicial spaces, why though? Well, It's meme'd as he his commented on the sex work got debanked, commenting how publishers bamboozle creatives with NDA's and sussy licensing deals.

So, ahedonia aside, got further comments of this reductionstic. Physical mechanism and the clerks that do it?

I here plenty of flippant accounts with the porn community, or the gooning community, and then there's the masturbating yourself to death with substack posts. Is it a dead end? Well, It goes back to Queens blade critique by Bennet the sage.

" queensblade of being too good at targeting their intended demographic, but that doesn't mean it has to come with all the narrative baggage that it does in terms of succeeding with their demographic as well as being a generally alright story, queen's blade falls short

of my little pony "

Well, that aspect maybe why they call is sex work, since the illiterate audience who only cares about that aspect will be an left to feel like doing something better. Even Seth dismissed it with "A/B testing leading decentralised hosts leading to a porn site."

"Cookie cutter porn accounts farming commissions" - anonymous, It was with a somebody dissatisfied, and it's coming along with my own that, this idea that you have to do it, is the pervading idea of sexcess, forced labour. It can reek of desperation, or it can not, If they are friendly, I'm not calling it out, only picking out the hustlers, because fewer hustlers mean I can get more honest conversations.

Guess I'm not a gooner, to an obsessive compulsive disorder.

I asked one of the sex workers, and I attempts to clarify my own thing, too much of response rate rather than any literacy, it's too casual.

"That's the problem with the physical mechanism of sex/asex work, it can get so reductionistic to exclude literary genre." I typed to one of the rule 34's, and with that, if financial extentionism is all they care about. Then, that ain't exiting.

Since, the governance will have to go anarcho-syndicalist or communalist with no enforcement, (look up, shadow libraries) otherwise it will have to be a keep-scrolling and self-governance kind of affair, Extrajudicially. 

They are going to deal with certain kinks being illegal. With this brute fact reductionism, stop acting infantilizes and tantrums. ( That's anarco capitalism for ya )

Start to be taken serious, not like the prosumer ways of a gamer. Fatalism and predetermination. I wish the porn vendors well, other than that.

Tom-Fishburne Cartoon. Unfortunately, since the ab-testing of the hosts leads to a wild west and Kim Kardashian Meta, I'm not so sure if being cute and entertaining American audiences with a mawkish look at the sex industry.

It's a doomed excuse without the organisation. So I'm going to have to be more picky with the untagged hustling on microbloggers.

Hustling by definition is dishonest money-making.

Since sex work (and work as in being nebulous that It can capture forced labour) can force a toxic notion of sexcess. < Further Reading/n essay.

Doing something you don't care about ; a good doomerist post

What happens when you commodify?

All merely at the breaking points rule of law?

Just do rule 34 art and tail popular entertainment campaigns?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just make sfw cutesy relatable comics while having no editorial work

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just do stuff at Buzzfeed with listicles and other things?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just just just.

I do respect this doomerist substack article.

The lonesome death of the last copywriter

"I’ve had a growing frustration with the way AI skeptics, especially my comrades on the left, dismiss the likelihood of mass AI job replacement by pointing to quality problems that are both easily and affordably fixed.

Most creative jobs in the US aren’t making art that people care about. They’re making corporate slop that everyone hates, but which is necessary for doing business. The only people who will miss the human slop when it gets replaced with AI are the humans who used to get paid to make it."

Aaah, respect. Well, If it happens or not, have a look.


Listening to te the one and only Garth Marenghi's Bursted Earth. Or I could listen to Snoop Dog's voice read voices to me on Speechify. Which is more mediocre. Seth said it best with his own doomerism, anybody hustler stuff that he can use Stable Diffusion that's pretty alright, or the one and only illustrators he alludes to.

Or that, not rehortically, more convincingly. So that's his commodity fetishism and prestige. Magic and mysticism that can't be judges from the algorithm mindless data-landscape.

Shadow Libraries Save em'

-

Look at those CLOWNS anti-ai wash academia most communist concept!

 Here's a link to the >> Shadow library Book << as you're reading. A call to protect the commons with 

This is the life, of our shared pool of knowledge in the commons to us.

Yet so to radicalisation (For all the wrong reason) are made to make sure it goes away by those who go I'm just doing my job to relatable/symbolic capital.

Radical Polarization, principled within a stereotype of a cartoon villain taking all art, regardless of the socioeconomic complexity. Along with the government, that's a matter beyond my comprehension of the way, with its interactions with copyright in Poland and the manner of environment. How decentralized platforms happen to work with regulation with the wall of shame, to the means of holding it with account to our civil autonomy. 

Now, we get to see that even with those who do and it's a long 4 day read.

The craft of natural sciences and the social, It's a prideful thing to be proud of.

When Propriety DRM hits, Moral panic washing.

I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.

... This nsfw gag

Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers. 

Deontological application? If a cost that would not even work? <Article of a chief ecomonist btw.

No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?

Reading this free open university course of criminology

Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?

Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.

(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)

Moral entrepreneur is such a good term 🛋️💭

novelty =/= originality

People can be original, and still be insufferable.

Newness and the one an only uniqueness are not the same, Given the progression of time for each. One Direct response (extend) and the cognition (brand).

Newiness, we know the news can be ignored if it ain't emergency room stuff.

The others have gone through the gauntlet of conflicting symbolism, through pundit or cute to the blips of hosts/platforms. Well, professionals that don't attend.

If that the thing is one is first and lucky, then that ain't good enough. The law of diminishing returns takes it toll.

freedom to choose/freedom to access, License faf

 These are state rights, from the state.

Prefer Freedom To access over the freedom to choose, being to choose to be a naughty publisher with a 95% contract of all labour.

Another victim claimed by the copyright industry complex.

Creative service

Creative service Gabe? Well, I have my thoughts.

Venn diagram of industrial and artisanal modes of production! Marxist doctrine, a go-go.

Industry its stuff of labour and professionalism, and the firms. Right to the artisanal.

Marx, Keysein and the Marginal Austrian one with theory of economic value, scarcity to make a product.

Artist implies creativity of an individual, not a collective (Even if they have style guides and a place and trace.) Thats the industry of arc! Taylorism and Fordism combined to make it with scientific management.

So, The mode of production is required to ascend from hackneyed to creative. Select the factory, select the future.

Industrial hacksmenship, or marginal cost and value vis the artisnship of labour value. (That's the doctrine of Marxism for ya)

Graphic design and Illustrator, industrial, Contemporary art not so much.

There it is again, Commercial and Literary distinction again.