Curate = direct response

Simple observation, yet goes unnoticed on a micro-level.

Everbody online wants to be curated, want to be selected, yet nobody wants, from the entering in the arena of social media.

Then this extremophile place where they act like the celebs they want, to the informal or formal curation, the matter of what.

The only place to escape the rhetorical center is to do it personal and not post. The right to be forgotton can't escape these bounds.

You can't be better than the form, the respect of it.

Now that's constraint and framing.

On Tyranny of convenience, the reassurance machine

This thing (Other than notes of net neutrality, which I covered. )

Abstract expression with meat grinder doodle

Is this where the regular kind of our ideas.

Boring =/= Trivial

Regular

Mediocre

Standard

Normal

Non commodity fetishised

Mainstream

Specification

All those things indicated a matter of day expressed to be somewhere normalised of oughtiness of little moral judgements of the day become a code of ethics followed and into a way of life. 

Well

Such a matter is what we're dealing with tech that can become something of a quick utility monster fix.

Now it's time to not be contingent on the utility alone. With excuses with that.

Recognizing (From Kant) The external and internal and vital conceptual distinction of consciousness is necessary to understanding. Well, Is there a distinction for the commodity and the fetishised.

Not the body fetishism, the most profitable that a rhetorical error.

Pacta Sunty Sevanda a deal is a deal

 When the publisher who had bound by the firm fiction, and is bound to serve the individual freelancer with a contract that will ensure distribution of the metrics.

Then the deal has been readjusted again, with self-publishing slush pile, yet more slush piley

Guess it's time to understand this game, or status game, anti-status game, or status game collapse. 

Well, well, even with this cussy article brought to new values of reassemble the most simple governmental factors to plays.

anti-synth-work

Work giving labour to another or to yourself, physical or cognative.

Yet the netural, it happens, with the schedule wether it goes or not.

Even with this one.

The performance continues.

With each tip of typing this, the montony and banality of a copywriter one once where unfurls the a moment of yearning for connection.

Then it returns in of itself.

Tautolgys sticking, tautolgys going.

The perks of obscurity

It's all a blur, so many little content curation and moderation being what is sold, all in an expanding universe of vendors and suppliers with all their advertising, all a blur, all the fandom/hatedom, all the time, all of it was going in a blur of media heads down the way.

Academics are avoiding xwitter, or microblogs, some of them are in substack, they are going there, I found a good post on obscurity.

Since it's all datum, observable of the lowest stratum of comprehension, the scientific, and the narrative of this is to study, or when with a monopoly/monopsony of attention. Fame/infamy explains the entitlement complex of status value and cultural capital.


There's little attention. No data for interupption advertising.

No Ruthless expose industry complex, the need to make dramatic fiction to draw attention.

Thousands of merchandise, gone.

Fan fictions all around. Shippers, and all that.

No Status value to follow.

Cherish this moment while it lasts, I trust you, don't I?

( Oh, I've still have to learn to do a sales call, and a payment specification. )

What did Zig Ziglar, a conflict avoider, says with the data generality and a meaningful specific? Or, a semiotic specific in a chain.

If you know, you know, sex work vendors/suppliers governance

There was this cartoonist who did this graph, this is from memory of digital dreams.

Yep, NSFW do get paid better in extrajudicial spaces, why though? Well, It's meme'd as he his commented on the sex work got debanked, commenting how publishers bamboozle creatives with NDA's and sussy licensing deals.

So, ahedonia aside, got further comments of this reductionstic. Physical mechanism and the clerks that do it?

I here plenty of flippant accounts with the porn community, or the gooning community, and then there's the masturbating yourself to death with substack posts. Is it a dead end? Well, It goes back to Queens blade critique by Bennet the sage.

" queensblade of being too good at targeting their intended demographic, but that doesn't mean it has to come with all the narrative baggage that it does in terms of succeeding with their demographic as well as being a generally alright story, queen's blade falls short

of my little pony "

Well, that aspect maybe why they call is sex work, since the illiterate audience who only cares about that aspect will be an left to feel like doing something better. Even Seth dismissed it with "A/B testing leading decentralised hosts leading to a porn site."

"Cookie cutter porn accounts farming commissions" - anonymous, It was with a somebody dissatisfied, and it's coming along with my own that, this idea that you have to do it, is the pervading idea of sexcess, forced labour. It can reek of desperation, or it can not, If they are friendly, I'm not calling it out, only picking out the hustlers, because fewer hustlers mean I can get more honest conversations.

Guess I'm not a gooner, to an obsessive compulsive disorder.

I asked one of the sex workers, and I attempts to clarify my own thing, too much of response rate rather than any literacy, it's too casual.

"That's the problem with the physical mechanism of sex/asex work, it can get so reductionistic to exclude literary genre." I typed to one of the rule 34's, and with that, if financial extentionism is all they care about. Then, that ain't exiting.

Since, the governance will have to go anarcho-syndicalist or communalist with no enforcement, (look up, shadow libraries) otherwise it will have to be a keep-scrolling and self-governance kind of affair, Extrajudicially. 

They are going to deal with certain kinks being illegal. With this brute fact reductionism, stop acting infantilizes and tantrums. ( That's anarco capitalism for ya )

Start to be taken serious, not like the prosumer ways of a gamer. Fatalism and predetermination. I wish the porn vendors well, other than that.

Tom-Fishburne Cartoon. Unfortunately, since the ab-testing of the hosts leads to a wild west and Kim Kardashian Meta, I'm not so sure if being cute and entertaining American audiences with a mawkish look at the sex industry.

It's a doomed excuse without the organisation. So I'm going to have to be more picky with the untagged hustling on microbloggers.

Hustling by definition is dishonest money-making.

Since sex work (and work as in being nebulous that It can capture forced labour) can force a toxic notion of sexcess. < Further Reading/n essay.

Doing something you don't care about ; a good doomerist post

What happens when you commodify?

All merely at the breaking points rule of law?

Just do rule 34 art and tail popular entertainment campaigns?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just make sfw cutesy relatable comics while having no editorial work

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just do stuff at Buzzfeed with listicles and other things?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just just just.

I do respect this doomerist substack article.

The lonesome death of the last copywriter

"I’ve had a growing frustration with the way AI skeptics, especially my comrades on the left, dismiss the likelihood of mass AI job replacement by pointing to quality problems that are both easily and affordably fixed.

Most creative jobs in the US aren’t making art that people care about. They’re making corporate slop that everyone hates, but which is necessary for doing business. The only people who will miss the human slop when it gets replaced with AI are the humans who used to get paid to make it."

Aaah, respect. Well, If it happens or not, have a look.


Listening to te the one and only Garth Marenghi's Bursted Earth. Or I could listen to Snoop Dog's voice read voices to me on Speechify. Which is more mediocre. Seth said it best with his own doomerism, anybody hustler stuff that he can use Stable Diffusion that's pretty alright, or the one and only illustrators he alludes to.

Or that, not rehortically, more convincingly. So that's his commodity fetishism and prestige. Magic and mysticism that can't be judges from the algorithm mindless data-landscape.

Shadow Libraries Save em'

-

Look at those CLOWNS anti-ai wash academia most communist concept!

 Here's a link to the >> Shadow library Book << as you're reading. A call to protect the commons with 

This is the life, of our shared pool of knowledge in the commons to us.

Yet so to radicalisation (For all the wrong reason) are made to make sure it goes away by those who go I'm just doing my job to relatable/symbolic capital.

Radical Polarization, principled within a stereotype of a cartoon villain taking all art, regardless of the socioeconomic complexity. Along with the government, that's a matter beyond my comprehension of the way, with its interactions with copyright in Poland and the manner of environment. How decentralized platforms happen to work with regulation with the wall of shame, to the means of holding it with account to our civil autonomy. 

Now, we get to see that even with those who do and it's a long 4 day read.

The craft of natural sciences and the social, It's a prideful thing to be proud of.

When Propriety DRM hits, Moral panic washing.

I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.

... This nsfw gag

Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers. 

Deontological application? If a cost that would not even work? <Article of a chief ecomonist btw.

No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?

Reading this free open university course of criminology

Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?

Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.

(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)

Moral entrepreneur is such a good term 🛋️💭

novelty =/= originality

People can be original, and still be insufferable.

Newness and the one an only uniqueness are not the same, Given the progression of time for each. One Direct response (extend) and the cognition (brand).

Newiness, we know the news can be ignored if it ain't emergency room stuff.

The others have gone through the gauntlet of conflicting symbolism, through pundit or cute to the blips of hosts/platforms. Well, professionals that don't attend.

If that the thing is one is first and lucky, then that ain't good enough. The law of diminishing returns takes it toll.

freedom to choose/freedom to access, License faf

 These are state rights, from the state.

Prefer Freedom To access over the freedom to choose, being to choose to be a naughty publisher with a 95% contract of all labour.

Another victim claimed by the copyright industry complex.

Creative service

Creative service Gabe? Well, I have my thoughts.

Venn diagram of industrial and artisanal modes of production! Marxist doctrine, a go-go.

Industry its stuff of labour and professionalism, and the firms. Right to the artisanal.

Marx, Keysein and the Marginal Austrian one with theory of economic value, scarcity to make a product.

Artist implies creativity of an individual, not a collective (Even if they have style guides and a place and trace.) Thats the industry of arc! Taylorism and Fordism combined to make it with scientific management.

So, The mode of production is required to ascend from hackneyed to creative. Select the factory, select the future.

Industrial hacksmenship, or marginal cost and value vis the artisnship of labour value. (That's the doctrine of Marxism for ya)

Graphic design and Illustrator, industrial, Contemporary art not so much.

There it is again, Commercial and Literary distinction again.

Copyright = Monopoly/Monopsomy Rights

repeat the laws bopkin cappy, of the hedonic treadmills, of the race to the bottoms the law of the cruds

State-Sanctioned with the monopoly of force, that's a hierarchy. A scale of might that is either a service or hindrance.

The monopoly/monopsony of distribution, from publishers to celebrity/influencer. Choke point of ads. The market of trademark.

Techmonoploy, is the monopoly of acceleration and convienance, stuff that fastens our life within urbanisation one water is distributed.

All this ecomics and lines work in unison, with the phantasms of divergence.

Licensing =/= Conduct

Well, this was the illustration with the publishers.

 https://www.authorsalliance.org/2025/08/26/resources-on-copyright-and-ai-updated-faq-and-position-paper-on-lawful-access-and-fair-use/

Even those for the copyright protections are disagreeing with making style a trademark.

The Idea/expression, internal/external, still needs to be said within literacy.

Stylistic, abstract conceptualisation is going to be even harder.

MMM, Misconduct, is that a philosophical performative statement on use? Don't misconduct? I wonder what it means.

Makes me think of the term Use by Geo

That why I disagree with Philosophy tube's saying with those statements with AI, of investment, if that's such a broad definition, this is a statement of investment. With my Ko-fi 

All return of investments are connected with freedom to access to freedom to choose. Or why I don't go on twitter artist.

.

Illteracy bad?

 I must admit, I'm illiterate in certain topics, along with certain professions.

That's okay, admittance is alright. Since the tower of babel is itself with all the meanings, can show that it's all a matter of infinite meaning and infinite decoding of all things can't happen.

Suppose with all the knowledge, something will allow one to increase their direct response, conversion rates and external incentives.

Nope!

There it goes, another wave of news and synchronicity of the culture. There is all goes again, like a train. We all have illiteracy within us, it's another hedonic treadmill.

Do the reading, yes, yet don't hold back. Have editorials, opinions and themes and see what works.

"what to do now?" Best *____* Sufficiency > Best

Here's some axiology and specs, although it shifts on the internet. Merely my attitude.

It's wrong to think that infinity of goods/services is a necessary been to believe, for it is an unmeasurable concept.

Sufficiency is the thing that fills the cup with the material baseherent (Baseherent, foundherent based on Susan Haack) conditions. With the knowledge, no perfect knowledge as the work continues.

It all continues, that's a mark of persistent in the face of adversity.

Guess I'll quote as practice.

G. A Cohen, "The promise of abundance is not the endless flow of goods, but a sufficiency produces with a minimum of unpleasant exertion"

Such a definition that can fit well with labour and with the creative to help auto-regulate. Auto-regulate to make it trial and error.

Can't have everything.

prosperity manifestation refutation

Taking bits and bobs from philosophy students, again due to my lack of credentialism of the matter.

Rhonda Burnes the secret makes inroads. Again, the growth YouTube of promising others to be celebritys/influncers are based on this. Including with it, playing with the verificationism of direct response.

Wow, even the smallest viable audience may share something with that logic. Yet that can be a means of communication and commodity fetishism.

Have another prosperity gospel refuter I guess when It comes to videos.

survivorship bias

 Overlooking the fact there are so many, from the ad creep, the ad creeping horizon of expectations. With the crawling sigma grind set and the crunch culture. That happens to be the case of the odds one out with courses.

Swimmers body all over again, instant results, before and afters, edits, get the she-bang in the flash, transform in the snap of the fingers.

Yep, too good to be true 
Survivorship bias, like fallacies, are informal fallacies which can't be quantified and need credibility to back it up. I'm going through my own experience with this.

Should include western ballet thing, yet that's my campism and politics talking. Still reassessing my own positioning on that matter, and will have to come back to you with another editorial.

Wrong about work hour estimates

I'm being overly meticulous for a point, to the point of calorie tracker.
 

Bearnards boop animation

Current day on Thursday, last day of July. Unreliable work tracker got from this post, with thoughts.

Two fat Monstys -8hrs from idea board 5hrs?

Scar's portrait

-8 hr 31 on pinups of Jon On Plaza.

Double spread's within adult works Frog F'd minus the 33 h

Cover

End cover pinup. These are moments I have done after my workout schedule 5/2 week. Apparently. Even if I cut back on volume.

The lord's ram splash pages.

My blog pages (some of them lost as I deleted the doodles as I was done) Total collective time.

Look it that, my vertical blog doodles are even more inconsistent.

Another with my pinups. Last time it was five hours, it was typing up in m blog.

Sometimes I type in my phone, I read while walking, does that count? Reading for pleasure, reading for essays to learn a thing or two, 

ugh, felt most tired with this one


This was all the industrial tradition of scientific management by Taylor.  Yet I cannot determine or take it seriously, there's only a long succession of mise-en-place and the little.

Then the physical coaches like Eric helms with auto-regulation, fatigue management and deloading with workload sensitivity. That's not even touching on the work, and it's ontological characteristics that It could be questioned. Anti-work and the Burnout society with the virtue of uselessness.

Yet ho ho, all these work hours. They're all so arbitrary.

It's going to take a lot of unionizing and atomisation that will take on the industrial burnout machine, that's already displaced us.

Oh, and remember Ashton Hall's morning routine, there's this thing that it was pure advertising, and it's race to the bottom because it's become a commodity now.

Bragging on social media labour power has become advertisement now, and the cobra effect of that has seeped into it. They

I'll put a gag routine here.

Even with the work hour laws and such. They are not reflected with the advertisement for these kinds of motivational TikToks. Unethical advertisements driven by response rates and audience capture.

This applied latterly with my programming of artwork has been better, so I'll share it.

the is-ought gap of making/publishing frequencys

 Welcome to the machine part two. Of our dysfunctional business models. Of marketability, marketability, of marketisation and unmarketerisation. Such is our commercial or uncommercial strategy.

Oh, I was thinking about frequency, I will put Jay Levinson quote in my writing. Oh, that's trust

Well, that's the amount of way can teach that advertising was a "tax on an unremarkable product" being false, ( I'm misquoting here) Yet, nobody's consistent, at least with people buying advertisements, they aren't going to go away.

I know there's something remarkable with the Kim Kardashian book deals, including the deal with Ninja, cui bono (Who benefits) can be an obvious question here, especially with commercial publishers.

Oh the is-ought between David Hume's is a remix/metaphor of making and publishing, especially digital publishing/traditional publishing. Something ain't translatable with there's a jump.

10 min

Had to think, this does not apply to hobbyists.

I know I shouldn't be reading advice in YouTube comments, yet this one applies
"@Solastiel1 day ago
A well-intentioned version of this advice would be akin to, "don't even think about marketing until the manuscript is finished, then you can worry about appealing to your demographic." The idea that good books possess some innate power to find the right audience by virtue of quality alone is complete Prosperity Gospel nonsense."