Omniameliorism: finding the limits of craft and pragmatism.

Better at who? There is no better possibility with the commodity of React streams and thirst traps. The conventions of Meta make a new commodity of various lanes of audience capture hitting the area of iconoclasm.

Such as the thought-terminating cliché of a part of the comparative of direct response pragmatism sold back to us, which hides the opportunism of finding a needle in the haystack and all that marketingese.

It's a part of the awareness of the prosumerism of our desires of status. Fed onto such as the cycle of satisfactions of a hedonic treadmill that keeps us going.

For the desire of controlling the ritual of solving a rat race crossword that seems to move somewhere, yet then nowhere.

This ritual from Byung about the virtue or will to uselessness, or unpragmatic emptiness, against the mainstream narrative? Well, peace of mind. The point is to dissect its pragmatic framework of presuppositions and unpersuasive tautologies and then process.

Even progressing or developing to nowhere, the presentism will work now.

Carry on.

Benefits of having a essay on a personal blog.

• You don't have to correct wilful misinformants.
• Foreknowledge of spectacles to pay attention too.
• Certain mindsets of the mediums of the way can interpret without paraphrase.
• Data that one places to refine into further insights.
• Empathic thinking that is unreleased to bring before connection.

Curate = direct response

Simple observation, yet goes unnoticed on a micro-level.

Everybody online wants to be curated, want to be selected, yet nobody wants, from the entering in the arena of social media.

Then this extremophile place where they act like the celebs they want, to the informal or formal curation, the matter of what.

The only place to escape the rhetorical centre is to do it personal and not post. The right to be forgotten can't escape these bounds.

You can't be better than the form, the respect of it.

Now that's constraint and framing.

if you pontificate about attention

One may getting pretentious, and unlikable.

Lack of self-awareness or no anatta of non-self of being a hack/proffesional.

So, All this meta-recursion is all the moment of monetisation hits I dip out.

It's the most naked new-mania. 

So it begins again, and to the meta, people making money by teaching others to make money online, with the business models having to be unique alongside and tethered to the under structure of the digital landscape.

Unless if it's about advertising, by Seth Godin, Or Tim Wu's the merchants of attention. Or even Mathhew Bartholomew's Ad-creep. Can only take so much pretention in a day.

Inimical to the fictional true justified belief, along with fictional Legalese, so handle with care.

Tailism/Computationalism = The maker of Slop

Now for this version of this Post and forming a rant as I become kitsch like this post. This is my scribomania making another post to see if I can act out from this. Well, here's me looking into the lifestylism.

Human Sloppers, Ai Sloppers, anything that already fills the search engines. Stochastic Seo servitude. Well, Fwopman happened to say stochastic parrot, I do say with big content and Alexander Avile refutation, With the statistical inferences of deductive and inductive processes;.

Short term, self-absorbed seo cargo culting. Even with radical opposition, it becomes a dependence (Was Martin Heindigger to point that out?) Mmm, better be quiet with the Confuseopoly swindles.

It's doomerism cult. Short term and selfish, Welp, Like an advertiser.

So when if all the time to build a coalition firsthand, a tribunal of the others and important allies that can help satisfy the needs, and punish to fit the responsible course. They can be placed within trust.

So, with the cool-hunters, the cultural conservatives, There's only the right to the city that will remain

"You gotta slop it up! 🎶" This song is stuck in my head as I did not invite it, it's a deviation of you gotta pump it up from the substance

That's life huh, well, Sturgeons law of 90% is that there is stuff to ignore. Curation time! Curation for amelioration.

mmmmmmm

welp, an entertainer's gotta entertain

Inertia Character apologies Trist

What am i to do with you?

You were an impulse that's managed to come intuit, with me being my first characters before Couch George.

Now I cannot assemble my cast to make scenes, not illustrative beats it's where you lefts, of sexualised thinness, now I'm not looking at you as my inertia of my words and work will not be able to move you, or pick you like a means of display with words.

A skater that was failing, you were going to be part of the previous scenes where you were a gym goer who never gains muscle. Then you'd be free.

Yet, time and experience are cruel mistress.

Oh I don't know.

Maybe another cartoonist can do you justice, selling you off can be too stressful, though. I barely have enough conversion rate as it is, maybe I don't have that ruthlessness and showmanship available.

Not like the SEO circus of waves have much interest with me anyway.

Thanks for the benefit

Oneirataxia / Hyperreality

Metamodernism time! The literary kind, not the self-defeating financial kind.

 Fantasy and reality. Non-reflective of the person creating such a fetish, yet the time, it comes out.

Within our own realms of design where our own perception, we are entering a realm where art is hostile to entertaining the perceived, yet through the repulsion becomes the paradoxical attraction, for attraction cannot be the positive value being made, so right today, that's with the negative, with its scepticism brings an compulsion.

36 essay on a self-referential movie. Funny Games. Which is an attempt to bring opposition of meaning into the mix of our own perceptions, along with ending within a pretentious ending that cannot be called slop. Anybody who's read scriptwriting 101 will be getting the cues right now of who's being signalled, with this being the in-joke.

We are stuck within our own entertainment. On how YouTube and xwitter being on the downside of ad money and not subscription services.

Slippery slopes, or not.

Irony and sincerity, such a distinction. Irony poisoned is sincerity masquerading as irony.

Heteroglossia : On Genre

 As with my dabbling with languages, terms come, expressions neologised as concepts crystallise, reflecting "in terminology" of yesteryears. Moving on with Heteroglossia.

Weaving the linguistics, from Arch-genre, to Sub-genre, to various stages, to the formation of our meanings and back again, it's a literary marvel to behold.

With that of the meta-in-of-itself that can defy any generality and specificity. Such a means of commercial editing shows that show which to either capitalise on attention and their hold.

What concepts, what ideas, what stuff no copywriter can uphold. Yet, with me and others being the enlightened within discursive circles. This is why the literary entertainment could be the highest form, which will always be better. Nothing is that memorable from that quick-shot place of dopamine culture.

Sure, whether these concepts will funnel towards are fictional entertainment, retaining into concepts of our culture is another matter. It's certainly been a fine, literary dive.

Such terms of sociological understanding, Even though the concept of the horizon of expectations will be needing its out post of understanding. Despite it sounding like a final fantasy villain.

Semantic/Semiotic Ascension

 

Rest in peace Danial Dennet, discovered his death.

Sellars said "The aim of philosophy is formulated, is to understand how things in the broadest sense of the term hang together in the broadest sense of the term "

Wow, this books dances with physics and risks becoming a deepity when going against a deepity. I love it, this slither of a point of view is to be understood, even if it leads bouncing ideas of certain intellectuals, (such as P*****) i did enjoy revisiting these ideas, such a culmination of meta-understanding.

There is only the meta-philosophy, or even non-category philosogy. Let's not get too deepity in our literary work.

He blends physics terminology with naturalistic study with his conceptualisation. With an understanding of the intentionalism, derived and original as a passageway towards his argument for free will compatibilism. Intellectual stimulation that brings me back.

These concepts are going to stimulate me back again.

Now that's meta, such philosophy really show the strength of the written page medium-wise.

Anti-Lore

Reflections on this Anti-Lore of refinement, 10 min read.

The poster of Xwitter clarifies this ain't against backstory, it's a commodified idea of the sake of it, most charitably.

Is the commodified churn into the circle of SEO and unoptimised idea of discovery and virality.

This is all the refinement and cutting room floor process of revision of a thousand stimuli to one with refine idea into a finer point of synthesis. Especially these character thoughts that have been doing.

Is this an idea of the futility of rebellion of I.P of Graphomania of an in cased idea? Not really, all of this is free, and I'll be doing another idea tomorrow, these fixit-doit-changeit ideas are for your intellectual entertainment. These ideas, these 'lore' or backstory is always going to be back, and not the forefront of my ideas to be made into what is to be considered worthwhile.

All the seamless times I'm feeling like a mere hackneyed illustrator making against constraints, assigned by my own boss, which I'm following with this curse of the free internet. Being free to write what may.

All the mind grime fluff that I scrape and put out here into words, right here and now.

This is all yet another revision, to economise our ideas with effort through the paradox of less and more.

Writing shall be part of our art, and art our writing.

There shall be our own attempts to coalesce and condense several meanings into neologised with each span of times.

Have some of the books I've read been unnecessarily extended for making money? Can't think it now.

Vinces Early Birthday Sketch

 

This is life, even with a short movement of 30 minutes and the lasso tool, I still make a sketchy sketch.

Can't really work with the constraints too much.

That's how it is.

A memoir, in my taste, is not something empowering because it can be plain journaling.

Just like this. To dramatize a slice of life into a memoir is to betray it.

Gellman's amnesia effect

Social media can do a thing, A gell man amnesia effect on advice. Extranet did this with TikTok.

4:33

What is with these contradictions, irregularities and stimuli that amalgamations? There's always going to be streams of advice that are going to state you can do better?

Better for whom, though? There's that moment when you hit publish without and editor and the traditional publisher would of delt with it. Not anymore, they are pursuing random blips of platforms and streams of attention, to advertise their own publishing as they continue to consolidate.

The industry forgets what's right and wrong with advice, and it continues to chug along merely for the sake of that. Short term benefit rather than complete.

The industry needs to take it's own advice, yet it forgets, having its own amnesia.

17 min video , especially of the last moment where influencers and its figures.

Theo is baby

Make me more important! More page space! More screen time, my audience needs to see ME! No other characters. Merely me! Only spotlight.

Your efforts are my only existence of ME! I require the attention you get through the effort of your work hours. All that ideas that are made through me. All you're lifetime and work-hours! Yes, give me all those are made.

It's productive? Productive or business or made to be made to all our desires to be made to make. Be my mad god and sssssseeeeervve ME-

Monetization of all this of the jester, and the librarian.

More of my video feed of essays to intake.

 Rosen 1:16 hours of circles. Is it monetization for the platforms, or the self-efficent work of the creative?

Since commercial is connected with direct response of the market funnel, it feel intuitive, yet that's putting the cart before the horse.

Makes me consider how these incentive with a niche, yet the essayist or literary creator does not concern with capitalizing for pigeonholes and the mass, he creates with a clear motivating and intent. Oh, how it is simple that it's become yet another demographic to market too. The totalizing thing that these social media platforms is to log off.

23:15 On the dunking turning into an essay. Follow up to the Dan Olson's essay. Cussing.

All the part of becoming a conscious media consumer. These lol cows or content farms, put into another charitable. It is the simple following of a pattern of a formula that's leading into to a culmination of responses, for exposure, for the leading into a completely uncertain substance down a draw to lead into patronage.

What a dream, what a path, maybe this is a certain kinship that I can see with all this pattern making. Jesters entertain, jesters reflect, the jesters that are within all of us.

In ways of the argument, there ain't much a divide between the literary and entertainment. How the lol-cow, and the librarian shall look at each other. Let them separate, as the medium is till forever the message.

Do it for the plot/I read it for the plot

Still thinking of the limits of the burlesque 3rd chapter.

I looked at Kim Kardashians book publisher's deal, They didn't because of the plot, they did it because it will make a lot of money, that's commercialism. Commercial publishers and going to act commercial to high enough response rates regardless of literary skill. As if courting commercial publishers is a goal to pursue to begin with, (I'd question it). Do they care for the kinks when they gave an advance to ninja for a comic deal too?

Could preach the virtues of self-control to a commercial publisher, yet that's not what the point is, I'm not sure if it wants to be fixed.

That's the limits of the burlesque, plotless entertainment and the reason that meme of people saying that they are reading this for the plot, merely as the ones reading playboy for the articles, is wrong. It's physical appeal, then nothing else. It's going to require a lot of self-awareness to be able to handle its mixture into the other genres, inside out of the formula of its attraction directed.

Not only that, but it has to be done to the point of where the sentiment of doing it for the plot has to be respected. Otherwise, the non-sequitur use it merely that, non-sequitur.

Bennet the sage reviewed agent Aika that managed to do fan-service right ( Adult shot overload with the link.) 37

Self-prodification does not work

Being a calculus, abacus to the point if others, I look around to the chains. Wanting to be an adult from the calculations of the adult genre.

These once chains, they were the mascot of horror genre, one with Scott Cawthon and others, what a cesspit that was. Now these creatures, they are adults with a point of view, something somebody could relate to on an adult basis, from the ground up.

How can they operate? How can they be human? Are they human?

5 min old goodie on the mystery.

He also has a 60 min talk.

Crossing the road

Crossing the road is the most important thing in my mind, over and above paying attention to writing this blog post within my smartphone.

Now it ain't any more. This point of relative relevance is the struggle of the copywriter, when he is told that his sales card is going to be buried with many offers, better offers this could be the reality, the humble reality.

Why must the importance taken for granted at that moment at the pile of junk-mail? An error.

Contractual illiteracy lapse

Agent acting as an ally. A lawyer ally is an ally indeed.

Terms to look out for: Perpetuity, work for hire, right of refusal. ( Got that from the comic lab podcast, I'm still listening. )

Overlooking legalese, and its theory, is a dangerous oversight indeed.

What will they neologize next to weasel out their way of not paying the artisans and activists? The for profit commercial industry has an incentive, obviously, to have this hidden landmine of contract piracy. Where clarity is paramount.

Indirect exscuses are still exscuses where no clowns exist. No matter how buddy buddy it gets withe the comradeship dropped like a lead balloon. The commercial arene is something.

Theo's honest rules of clerksmanship

He's written it down, as he slumbers.

Working with the epistemological limits, a mindless antibiotic marketing body of work that is no more a clerk. A clerk who's built the industrial revolution. Faster and cheaper for tomorrow.

Some professions are intrinsically hackneyed: the fast food server of a franchised turnkey, the mass entertainer pin up artist, the pornographer, the shameless upstager, fan service and the copywriter. All serving the keys jangler.

As they've become producers.

Honest hacksmenship must remain with its dignity, or it becomes a grift. One can't make a friend out of the hack, only the benefit of the project they make.

When ambulance chasing the next cargo cult for their next flick, one understands they are hierarchical with the numbers game. What is this project for? The contribution toward the smallest viable audience. (Kevin Kelly 1000 true fan model) or for the benefit of the social media advertisers who are paying for the server costs?

Authenticity ain't it, the impression of verisimilitude and consistency matters. We dip into the lake of professionalism, then return for the short term. The only thing we ask for is dignity. Programming the animosity of tomorrow.

To ignore the illiteracy that is a true sin.

Stuck in the contradiction of appeal

Omnipresence ends the moment the rules of the boundary of what is written is drawn.

Ouch ouch, do the ID and superego fight. You can't help it. There we go.

Should you be spending more time in your own ideas and writing rather than social media grooming again, that's my job. I'm the social media groomer who does the response rates, the memes, the social media advertisements. All that, the embodiment of everything you and your artistry does not want to think about when navigating in this commercial quicksand.

Driven by our clownish impulses, we are not meant to be saved, we are the ones that are to bring the entire building down to the ground with what is demanded with our bodies.

Twist and distorted, it don't matter. It's ours for the taking for the showing of a lifetime. Let's see if this prayer you have will save you now. A calling where the dignity is within a Leper's hideout. We are deluded on the grandeur of godhood, all within a little box.

Sexual taste dysmorphia, you have it now. Algorism of a body part to star, so simple and not satisfaction.