For-Profit Creative software

1.15 mmm.

Yeah, inflation, Tariffs, it happens. The interactions may be denied with the territorlism, yet the structure underneath will interact regardless. There are those who want a prosumer entertainment diet, and then move on if that ain't satisfied.

Only a part of an accident with this fast entertainment, post entertainment society that's foaming in the mouth for the exptactions that it's forms of the bread and circus that can be maintained.

I'll keep creating art/entertainment as soon as I breathe and live, as a broken promise. This artist will create as long as she breathes, it's a dance between the physical aiding the ideas and the ideas aiding the physical. Such is the value-free main road that can't be handled by academies, politics, journalists, and education.

Hosting a Barnum freak show that's modernised for today, then we editorialise, they may return or not, we don't know. It's the internet, every either throws something in the dark till a surprise comes. Yet, the human connection is what matters.

So yeah, sticking with CSP and Blender. Making more on the long tail of distribution.

Strucurisation of scenes

This is a doodle pad now, something that a traditional artist will do to prepare his lines.

 Sociology has advanced, huh?

So, according to the story grid. One of the skills to write must have is writing not beats, something that an illustrator or actor must focus, but scenes. Yes, scene obsession from the Mise en place to Mise en scène. 

Scene scenes, that's the work that's building into sequences that completes a sentence, that completes an act, that complete a play, that completes a piece of entertainment/art piece.

From the objective view of a copywriter to the subjective view of a memoirist, why not both? Paradoxes merge into new concepts.

1:38 hour video, had some disagreements with the saphir wharf hypothesis and other theorys, source, though. Sociology will compliment the fictional ways of the novelist.

Our actions define our standards then back again, it's a circle way and since there freelancers have no higher authority or status to guide them, it's up to them and there responsabilitys.

Escapism ; Activism and videogamers as prosumer

I'm going to have to read/audiobook infinite jest, don't i? Given his thought experiment of the amusement-to-death show, from Jokers laughing gas to Neil Postman Amusing ourselves to death. Well, to clarify, this is critiquing gamers as a consumer demographic/physiographic by industrial standards.

Even with literary/commercial when it comes to editing, there's the 

Despite sentiments trying to depoliticise escapism, even if it leads towards the polite fictions outside. Our interactions of social media cannot afford to have our break as our fiction, from slice of life to slice of escapism, warrants it.

Suggest the webs we weave out of the fiction, inspire our acts and vice versa, rainbow capitalism is the case for it, (yet, given my position, not really. )

This is why I don't consider gamers, with their prosumeration and lack of literacy-friendly ways, to be considered worthwhile. Priories of finding a way out of babysitting cultural distress signal.

30 minute

ViDEo GaMes

Includes Bob Chipman (I have my fair share of disagreements with this critic, he was trying to be a literary critic, even ten years ago, it goes to show within the span of time how much gamers haven't grown out of this consume-first mindset.)

It's so editorial resistant to its own pretensions, so I'd best deliberately ignore such theatrics.

15 min 13 years ago

I don't follow him any more.

The continued tantrums as a business model, ah, how it insists respect from the editorialists and expertise while also to doing the work to earn it.
((Post edit Couch Gregor here, I recognize the adultism here by Bob Chip, yet trying to compare it to adult. Since it's originally marketed as a children's toy.))

Another one to finish, Tooltime as been an old video blogger with his own therys of media of why he does not engage with it, why he ain't boring. He does not have to grow, and that's enough.

This one of them is cultivation/hyperdermic theory, cultivation theory of influences being a theme. Ten years ago, wow, back when I was a kid. 36:20



He's the only one who has done a good faithed critism of a mediocre essay series.

The A.I Gulf, and auto-posting software : Postbirb/Buffer

When you do research to do a journalistic piece. You go around all the Internet to editorialise into an essay, these are all notes. Incoherently placed, here we go.

Since others use auto-posting software, I've dabbled within postybirb, and the more dubious online app buffer. I discovered Buffer advertises itself with link shortening, so I'll be direct. ( No point hiding it, I don't think boycotting/blacklisting will work either. ) Toothpaste is out of tube.

It's dubious since it has an auto-durative intelligence, that I haven't used. That if you want my word, since I want to be a professional writer, the portmanteau between illustrator and writer is a cartoonist. Not going to be using the 

( Postybirb does not do this, by the way. Even though, a spell checker is always appreciated for typos. )

No, I don't endorse it, yet my vote ain't going to count, ain't it? It's been integrated within 'Grok' within xwitter, and that I've been. There's still a rough folk congregation, a Venn diagram of the forming groups under various labels and political sympathies. I have some for the open source with my gift, as long as I own it. Well, It's the time for the commons and public domain have been useful services to our society. My characters coming from pride and prejudice.

(Sometimes I anthropomorphize my ideological conflicts as characters for my entertainment, Regardless. Do I even Fictionalise myself into a entertainer to absolve any responsibility? I'm certainly against the maximisers and what Chuck Wendig has done.)
To sketch out the labels some further, This is what called positioning:

Ai Futurists - Open sourcers ()  Copyright Maximisers - Ai Haters
Lets show this concept some more.

Some people use sneer/scare quotes within open source.

Fair use is always going to be murky water. You don't own concepts, poses, or colour schemes.

The grifters are the tasteless Elsa gate churners targeting illiterate kids to game with the essentialising of money for their product. Perfectly designed, unlike the imperfection wabi-sabi of art.

Despite Seth Godins endorsements of tech, I'm a technologist when it comes to aiding within the creative labour industry and freelance sectors. It's still decimating as we speak. I'll keep track of him. His take on AI going through a Gartner hype-cycle is another thing. It's something I resonate with, since once again, This genie has been out of the bottle.

With indie publishing, even when small businesses themselves can be as bad as their commercial counterparts. Then with Stephanie Sterling and above with the many disputes of Fair use being a muddy term of creation.

The water-usage is overblown, I've donated directly to Ecosia, which I recommend switching your search engine too. Heard it's less than boiling a kettle, I've rebalanced by carbon with a donation that I'm planing to give or my own writing of fiction.

Filippo Valsorda

‪@filippo.abyssdomain.expert‬

There must be something about wasting water that really clicks with people, maybe because they can visualize it? It's kind of farcical, the WaPo story about this tried to make it sound like a lot of water and in the process admitted it's... not?

‪Filippo Valsorda‬ ‪@filippo.abyssdomain.expert‬

·

6mo

Holy f**k I missed that: TRAINING ALL OF GPT-3 consumes in total as much water as... producing beef for two people for a year. Not pro-rated to the usage of GPT-3 two people make in a year. Total. And we get a whole article about the water consumption of AI?! bsky.app/profile/ryan...

December 17, 2024 at 2:27 AM

1 repost

9 likes

Since the growing of the usage of AI, I've been following the blogging of various writers who's describing their thoughts. So I'll have to keep track of this. Oh, I will vote for the shadow libraries because it's a means to spread the idea. I shall defend to the death for a creative to sales rep for free and paid. The economy of gifting and hobby does not exist.

I'll resolve this with a video by Shaquille on this. 21 min for those who have missed it.

They'll certainly be a market for hand-made craft, with more and more of this silly technology play-do'd search matter will create more blacklist. I speculate that it's still going to resurface with new iterations. This regurgitation is tasteless. This lack of direct action from others is also tasteless.

I do believe good artists should get paid for the labour and activism, yet this will move towards my leanings, given with my own accord. Copyright maximalism ain't the answer. It's not like these untouchable technopolys deserve any PR anyway, including Nintendo.

(Oh, and the reason I keep using bug is a two-way posting. Reduce cognitive load.)

Do contact me though, I don't

Mindless attraction, Mindless repulsion reduction. Gambling and the desire machine.

Tension 》 release/interpassivity which is the point of fictional entertainment in its brute reductionism, applied into dominion and monopoly over the social media.

I bet, with all the hackneyed work of what is deemed hackneyed now with circularity farmed for shareholder fixation, do we see it.

Desire machine that entertainment designs.

Essay of addiction by design, or compulsion.

1:09 hour

What a sensation, motor operations made unpersuasive, that's the hope for the effort.

Pretentious Hack

Who'd you trust? The honest hack or the pretentious one who calls himself and artist, wanting his tantrum taking seriously. 

The taxi driver who delivers, delivers you weird yet still on the point, or the one somewhere different where it completely does not work. Believing him the 'artist'? Despite the creativity being a liability.

Such is a retrospective of Doug Walker's the wall, the review that labour'd a risky commercial expression. It's bad.

Other that the complete contradiction of it being a love letter, along with the lack of an attempt of a soft sociological point of view being expressed. Because its comedy, contradiction for amusement? Or not..

I'd care for the inconsistencies if this was such an insult to a work of art. It was a literary endeavour, Doug's was, unintentionally.

no. There are plenty of reviews on the pretentious review, that you may have seen. He won the race to the bottom.

My autism, Why I wear it

 Because there are industry lead
ers out there who view my art hours as imperial conquest to plunder.

From this sweary rantaphon 13:50 Bringing back an old classic.

That's what I mean when they describe us as inspiration porn, we are made into objects that are groomed and then discarded like empty rented mules. It's cruelty and its determination from the profits are the point. Topped with a pie of exceptionalism of the status.

Of course, as I critique, there is some naive human who will be taken into work experience that will be pushed through the wringer.

The squashing within it all. A most strange fetishisation, the simplification of the human as resource.

Not a mark of sympathy, yet one of self-preservation.

Cruel Clown show

What a show that will others believe they're owed entertainment. Owed amusement, owed kiddie pool play.

Such is a means that will never end, of large waves of attentions economies that will move in and out, with much whimsy.

Fame, Infamy, and Attention Economising. It all happens at once, performance metric hallucinations shake like winds. Commercial platforms yearn for it, long for it, and call for it.

Now, I shall quote, as we go through this circles.

Dyna Soar 

"One of the worst things that can happen to an artist is becoming unintentionally famous on the internet. Nobody is in control of it, and when it occurs it’s a completely destructive force that endangers you and your work due to the nature of the majority of people online. The macrolevel behavior of social media is sick and twisted and directly/indirectly pursues the suffering and torment of others as entertainment Doesn’t seem to matter if you “embrace” momentary celebrity or not. It will punish you, hunt you, grift off you, and make up stories about you regardless. There is a sense of entitlement from the viewer that they are owed entertainment constantly from you. That all work you do is immediately “open source”, available to anyone, and ready to make a buck off of. Any rejection of this is considered elitist and antisocial, and the acceptance is considered “selling out”. You can’t win and in general, nobody I know that has had the spotlight thrown on them really wants that. We all know it’s horrible."

If you haven't already, you can look of Signifiers in documentary of the entertainment industry. Or, with how social media is treated like one.

FD signifer 1:12 with racism content warning.

Everybody fishes for a sinecure/Performance Metrics

 Users act nonchalant about the performance metrics, yet it's the business models work. How do they express is clearly, the distribution.

Making money may not be the point, yet the relationship that does not betray one another business is a relationship to be trusted. One of the conventions of business is no-comedy or clownery for a reason. No incongruity or contradictions for a reason.

The less amusement and more ruthless, the better. The less the genre signifiers towards amusement, the better. Believe of contribution with that motivation comes in mind.

Training and Performance Metrics, Ouch!

Three Nick'n Nite Audiences : Physco-Graphic ghosts

48 min of a huge documentary marathon for you to consider.

Analysis of the communities to make money, monetization of entertainment, it never changes

Three circles of reassurances, reassurances that an artist must not seek with his own way, there from the Nick'n Nite audience analysis of getting a return on their project There's overlapping magistrates and movement, only to the point. Where these to be watched out and treated/punished accordingly.

Such an overlap is to be brought into social media of what people engage with. With engagement rate and all that vanity is brought towards 'platform' with all that commercial slew.

Such is the taxonomy of commercial entertainment.

1. Wholesome - Toxic Positivity
   
   There these circles who treat positivism that things will get better, not somehow, WILL. Only a matter of time, no realism, no whateverism. Things are always bright-sided! Nope!
   
   The thing where this can get beyond such prudence shall not entertain such a thought. Where all the ides shall be lent with the ideas of into the realism.
   
   All yet a probing of radical dependence becomes nihilistic in of itself.
   
   Such as the iconclastic Dyna Soar's though say (Nsfw poster, do keep in mind.)
   
   
   
   

   Dyna Soar🦕

   ‪@dynasoar5.bsky.social‬

   I take an antagonistic stance towards the usage of the word “wholesome” in art. reactionary brain poisoned zoomerism

   December 11, 2024 at 11:08 PM

   45 likes
   

   ‪Dyna Soar🦕‬ ‪@dynasoar5.bsky.social‬

   ·

   5d

   it’s full of self flagellation too
   
   
   
2. Escapist - Fictional archetypes/Sexual formalism
   
   Ah, the other side! With their own drawings of the archetypes of the other ways of seeing the Jungian archetypes and such. Till the face that with ab testing things get prurient fast.
   
   Look in the light, with dreams not being accurate as we talk of the other things happen the best. A world realer than it could be within its own.
   
   Then in a moment, it's gone. Is this the fiction now? It's not that such a reassurance can be found.
   
   
   
3. Ironic - Satirical/Irony poisoned Paradox - poisoned
   
   So taken by the incongruity of their paradoxes and contradictions for jokes, they end up not handling with the punching towards the up/down. Who knows, Everybody is illiterate except us. Well, not really. Wearing contradiction is indeterminate as a status symbol.
   
   Such a matter as the comedian cannot touch make a difference with a difference itself, the ways with our comedy is going to be another aspect of how to handle the amusing ourselves to death.