What's one Kyro's box? Part 2

Two Recommendations as filler.

Polemics?? Governance? Even that liberal Seth has takes on it??
 
Accurate takes on Marxist Leninist governments that take the history seriously?

Collage?

What's on Theos?

Arguments for the pressupostionalism of god?? Nagel's Contingent and arbitrariness. 3 hours for those who have blessed to share it.

Play/serious, the book of play

The essay on play/seriousness Fast/slow.

5 stars.

Play

Between Illusion and reality.

To move, and to stand still, Etymologically from the fast and slow.

The slow plot and the fast spectacle. We dance with it. I can see why it inspired my play though. Aristotle as the tension with all the aspects that make our minds dance with the matter of understanding how it constructs our society and civilisation.

This read left me with hope how a concept effects us, infrastructure and urbanism with the products of our capitalism and industrialism has given us many benefits and many liabilities. Advantages and disadvantages. Something in the back of our minds with eudaemonia, quality of life and the cost of living.

Guess that's the narrative mindset, leaving him with respect of our institutions and organisations From dispersion of tension to the creation of it, two poles. Moving us forward.

This is the video that inspired my reading.

Ode to the Meme time

Abstract expressionist bwomph.

 Memeplexs

One thing social media has done, which is nice. Is memes.

The only idea and concept that Richard Dawkins every contributed to our culture, with communal expressions that lead to heuristics of better understanding of civilisation, or more heuristics.

Other ideas, such a study of meme, and the meme machine are better books on this phomonoa imo.

Quibbles, Jreg endorsement, already he may have normalised bad treatments.

Too much glazing of Richard Dawkins, the only one which I liked of the four horseman of the atheism was Daniel Dennet.

Now share along, those transcendent of the Draconian IP laws, spread away and fall through the ideas of all the ways into the art of collage and in the see of the cyberspace.

Swoosh!

The cohort of the beep-boopers.

 Beep boop

I'm a bot

Beep boop

Bot goes beep boop

Beep boop boy, beep boop

beep boop son.

beep boop

Letter of disinterest of Beepity Boop Wars

gambleor said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that Thunderf00t and Pat Condell happen to hold positions which broad brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny."

Principle, as radical ideas that have questionable roots and Polemics.

I apply it to this situation. Similar to the baseless polarizations and the increased amounts of dead-end intellectualisms. They should have bombed a data centre already, yet they are complaining on microblogging. It's

Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them. They are ultimately a non-event.

Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.

Listening and having my beliefs challenged, not by debate, yet by hearing those not of the main-road.

The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started the all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within 

Tesla and Nfts have been telling you of such wild dismissals, and I can read to that and draw it into info and into knowledge. If you've been wilfully misinformed, they are either hustlers or a bad actor. Hustler, there's only so much time to get the information that's sensible, that's not some BuzzFeed article.

Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls Baby Leftism for lack of a better term, (I call it Wilfully misinformed) Has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.

Yes, that's why I've had to moderate my stance on this, focus on broad brushing polemics provided by the perverse incentives of direct response (Things getting more outrageous than they already get)

This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:

• . Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient, It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out.
• Water has been refuted, repeatedly, here we are. Not valid.
• Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
•  Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class petit boug) Yet here we are.
•  Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels Group? weird centrist oppourtunists like Ed Zotron, hello?)
  
  Is this yet another reach via angry straight white men, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism!
  
  
• Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
• . Automation is a matter of capital and in regard to freelancers and firms. Too much epistemic certainty from those who aren't epistemic experts.
• The clanker slur 'discourse' has yet become ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
  
  When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
  
  The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
  
  Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
  
  They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.

Cussy nsfw rant incoming. Befor all of this started, 11 years ago. It's going towards the same trajectory. The bubble on social media is so isolated and that preponderance of response rates aren't like that. Not even a criminologist, there, shooting themselves in the foot.

I must return to the rant since of the small scale bubble of social media ain't reflective of activism at large, since the thing ain't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaption, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.

We will have to foundherently adapt to this epistemic tech, for no epistemological is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaption we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. This second order effects.

So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with properity drm? Misrabalist nihilists with the class action lawsuit, ones of blind faith

When they bring it like this.
Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul Supporters, and Mens right activists, that's my prediction.

If boycotts look like this, then it's going to yet another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.

I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right

Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it.

Peace ✌🛋

When Propriety DRM hits, Moral panic washing.

I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.

... This nsfw gag

Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers. 

Deontological application? If a cost that would not even work? <Article of a chief ecomonist btw.

No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?

Reading this free open university course of criminology

Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?

Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.

(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)

Moral entrepreneur is such a good term 🛋️💭

Reassembled/reinstatement rather than Replaced

 As I try to have an opinion (no opinions allowed on Twitter, artist) of being reassembled rather than replaced.

Two Studys, One of the evidence on Reinstatement. Along with a working paper on Robots and firms I've read. So do entertain better ones before looking at microbloggers and anger there.

(That's the physicalism's way of testing, from literature to textbook. Learned that from bodybuilding.)

Alternative to the populist one that worlds going to end, merely because that elite class, ( Demographically Christian white men in the west, capacity qua capacity) going to control slightly less of it. With its token supporters.

That's one of my theories with labour markets being made anew, deproffesionalize and professionalizing of our cycle.

Here's a materialist/ideology interpretation of the AI with structuralism. As I learn the tenets to apply to my method of understanding the world of qualitive differences. Here's an hour of a book I'm getting. B-B-Bonus video

Plopyright hate post by Bintendo

Hopefully nobody proselytizes with the doctrinaires. All the erotica about is vastly superior to that Business model. Welp,

Worst thing about copyright is reducing all ideologies of art into transacting a monopoly to a publisher, that's not art. That outcome ain't the top of the algorithm of our attention of all the hits (Although I do get it, otherwise it's the fire hose kind of situation.)

Gift economies (that don't exist.) Pro bono work (Professional stuff) and Alternative means of models that don't mean being subservient to reactionary capital. Copyright is the biggest defence of monopoly, so it's necessary that is hides behind it.

Some Bluesky posts I've been collecting..

Retweet
‪@wwahammy.com‬· 3mo
Copyright is the most anti-worker invention ever. It allows companies to demand writers do free work and then decide after the fact whether they want to pay for it.
Lawyer>
‪Meredith Rose‬ ‪@mrose.ink‬· 3mo
COPYRIGHT IS NOT LABOR PROTECTION COPYRIGHT HAS BEEN ABSOLUTE DOG**** AS LABOR PROTECTION FOR THE LAST 400 YEARS PASS LABOR LAWS STOP ASKING COPYRIGHT TO FIX THE WORLD

Oh well, With a Fandom is that it's licensing malpractices with charity and other events, it's not something I'd like to flirt with. This video may sum it up, yet there's the amount of distrust to add to my reason of why am I not a gamer.

There's a continued insistence to enjoy toys and the pleasure principle.

Welp

https://www.suedbynintendo.com/ for all the litigious malpractices

This is what monopoly without anti-trust does to you folks, litigious malpractice.

This has been going for years with such a controversy. From the 1970's of the demonology of copyright. Twenty page document of lectures of the thoughts.

Learning the Beep boopitys in academic circles

Beep Boop = Ai For any savvy reader out there, when I talk about it, within my microbloggers, I'm talking about it. I've to keep it low in case random aggro doomers come and nibble at

Since, its become a standstill of recursive doomerist. Ignore the news-headliners of ai being Jailbroken and come with me with my sources on knowing the beepity boopits.

I've mentioned The Last Invention, yet what about Machine Learning street talk?

Lump of cognition fallacy with the latest one here though, even though I enjoyed the definition of intelligence with less is more (Which is supposed to be a paradox btw.)

There, articulating theory's that better there, even the sceptics I felt like I learned something with intelligence being defined right now. Come and seek the new answers with a niche audience of about a bunch of llm/diffusion and creativity that ain't reflective within the bubble of social media.

Because it's ultimately, and most fundamentally inconsequential, those who beg for propriety drm and infinity of copyright trolls.

Guess I'm stuck in the middle again.

My foundherent philosophy beliefs

Self-portrait time.

My entertainment persona, is only part of being a memoirist. Mesmerism ain't in my cards, Under the veil of fiction there's a man, inspired by Andy Masley.

Consider using this to start my foundherent belief manifest. Part of my memoir series. It's not a fixed epistemology and coined by Susan Haack. Will begin with this framework. Have a peer of my simplistic and limited view of the world, of handling radical difference. From Stereotype to Archetype, and then into Reality comes my vision.

I don't have the expectation of somebody clicking my links, I'm doing it so I can check it out. Along with others.

Almost Complete certainty, Founderhent Belief.

Things I'm going to carry till the end of my lifespan.

• Naturalism exists, (introductory article here.) Since the doctrine means that sciences of physical to the sociological do matter. Contingent and downwards of our rational facilities dependent.
• Moral Desert does not exist. or, Polemics ain't serviceable to an entertainer by definition. Rehab and deterrence prefably as a performer. Not because it's for a living, because the magician loves to conceal and hold attention.
  
  Also, I don't like being too presumptive. Human rights have been putting my in that mindset.

• Personal identity reductionism/non-realist or the Buddhist (anatta) is reductionist. Radical, or the identity we make, it's constructivism to perform for informal groups. Or the more formal groups officially anointed by the state. The fictions of self we make are great entertainment, though.
  
  It's all into status roles and state within our linguistic make-up within our discoveries circles.
• Political egalitarianism, ideally, everybody rights are respected. Even with the critiques of the Marxist labour of value (the internet is a counter to that.) Well, I'm not a Marxist in the doctrinaire sense, more a sociologist. Since I'm an entertainer, I default to social democracy.
• Epistemological foundherent holism and no fixed fundamentalism, I rest within the distribution of laying along and correcting my beliefs as more convincing evidence comes along. All part of the dialectical within the sociological mesh we exist.
  
  Both Positivism (Quantitive) and antipostivism (Qualitative, Interpretationism.) Leads me into a descriptive, structuralist conclusion. I do like the big picture. A complexity that I embrace and a way away from radicalism.
  
  Why not both? Natural sciences and the sociological ones of teleological agendas.
  
  

Pretty sure beliefs, mid-certainty

• Vulger Populism/Mob Rule indefensible : High school, enough said.
• Anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron because it requires a state to enforce a monopoly or monopsony. Self-ownership is an absurd concept.
• Value Incoherence and Pluralism, both combined, help liven the discourse within academic circles to help coexist. Axiological, scaling and video gaming of entertainment makes my private companies won't help.
• Entertainment secularism from Academic, Law, Journalism, and Education and Religion, While I'm against the Platonic elitism in general, they're a field where more qualified voices count in regard to the scientific method and not fall victim to the race to the bottom of the vulgarisation of entertainment. It may not draw in the crowd as better, we need for better mass communications in regard to these more delicate fields.
  
  Academia and the main road, or what Susan Haack called preposterism where education was befallen to ad creep. Commercial speech ain't the same of any liberal right of freedom of speech and expression. Even if it does not exist at this reactionary capital.
  
  Not everyone is entitled to their opinion/expression, as in walking in a bank in a clown costume there may be, problems. Freedom of speech is a liberal right of non-state intervention, and I don't have an obligation to pay it any respect unless there's litigation. No, I don't have to respect that liberal right of non-state intervention.
  
  Only with the dance of the typographic and televisual states of our mode of production that we can lead towards edification.
• Non-Utilitarianism and Deontologist of Legalism can lead to a race to the bottom and should be with the deontology governance best interests to moderate it.
• Atheism : Secularism Yet I respect internalism if their rituals do not interfere with the state. Pretty sure god does not presuppose my thoughts. Even with theological naturalism.
• Marxism underpinning of sociology never intended to be having his doctrine written in stone and leave a legacy. Regardless, due to it leading to autonomy such as the stonewall riots, I cannot thank him enough with the labour theory of value. So yeah, he contributed. The state should, within reason, stop the perverse incentives of reactionary capital.
  
  Since with my disagreements with Marx anyway, most Marxists have become Marxists Leninst Maoist, anarcho libertarians, Sociologists and Economists.
  
  Retired now, still trying to explore new sociological avenues.

• Free will compatiblism is needed via the state to hold bad actors accountable for their misdeed, got that one from Daniel Dennet. Along with deontological structure to help organise society to help coexistence. One could say this is my politics.
• Marx was a naturalist with scientific determinism, so scientific realism model.
  Since science is our reality, academia should be able to help inform our public through mass communications to help our hierarchy of insight. Of our communication of plot the spectacle, academia and the main road.
• Licence witherism: The privatisation of property should be resisted, for whatever reason, people should not create an entire industry complex of reasons concerning Platonic natural law. There's a reason why rights are not natural. A handshake deal and a deal is a deal. Pacta a sundra.
  
  Marx was inconsistant with this, So Aaron Swartz goal with the creative commons is to help the Petit Boug (Like me) able to structure entertainment with the productive forces. Enclosure of the commons should be resisted.
  
• The right to the city matters with holding from reactionary capitalism. Since, capitalism has provided us with plenty of benefits, including welfare. One should be acting autonomously, away from those who own the means of publishing and reactionary strains to decommodify with the market metrics being organised.
  
  We can't mutual aid state capacity with cooperatives, though, That's the point where I can't take anarchists seriously.

• Animal cruelty witherism: The meat industry complex is cruel and it should be regulated. Despite my omnivore, a reduction of protein could lead to weight maintenance and a more deontological society.
• I'm a bit iffy on electoralism, rather expressing the right to a protest whenever needed.
  
• Mental/Status Functionalism : We, in a society from the profession and de-professionalise are designed for status role play and seriousness. Everything from the input and out of our wishful intentions and from our workful labour expressed is a manner of interconnectivity that creates our own interactions.
  
  These are ingrained in our structures. From informal groups into a start of our formations.
• Semiotic reductionism rather than a semanticist, not a Saphir Whorf Hypothesis I'd prefer to think visually rather than verbally, although I find great value within literature and the art of the verbal expression. Words do not change how we ontologically behave, all the symbols and the symbols.
  
  That being said, the cartoonist/scriptwriter can do well to know about narratology, patterns of narrative that can lead towards a structural understanding filling the semiotics with. There's only so much praxis that can be accomplished
  
• Experience machine would be a bad time, Brain stimulation reward is a race to the bottom. (Here's the thought experiment)
• I understand the tension of deontology/dialectical materialism, so I may add the capability approach to making Marx compatible, John Rawls had an approach too, ain't touching that. Can't read all literature.
• (Experiment here)P-Zombies aren't real due to the Gradualism of the mind. So it becomes a naturalised
• Moral Realist, Experimental ethics yet with model science can't answer everything, non realism can be entertained though. Still up.
• Structuration of aesthetic value: While subjective outsider art exists. Welfare is meant to help the mid-class with the enhancement of the productive forces. All part of pluralism.
• Gettier justifications being fully complete: That's where true justified complete belief comes in.

Stuff I don't have the foggiest, difficult

• Mathematical realism and non realism : Sure, evidentialism could suggest a discovery of counting, yet such a thing is up in the air.
  
• Qualia: Fascinating area of study, haven't specialised in the theory of mind that much, leave that to psychologists.
• Time Theory. B and A theory. Seems fun! Still a hole in my foundherentist framework.

Boom, that's a life.

This is post is CC BY-ND

Propaganda is education/from our attention merchants of sex.

 Wow, Formalised instruction one keeps personal, yet unless it's entertainment under the legalese of fiction, there's a more direct approach.

Welp, Since essays are propaganda much like school, here's one on education within the west.

Sex workers (Prostitution) as I agree with most of what this video is on about. Thanks for the public service, and even if the opinions don't align, I know I can endorse the views like this.

Is this what they mean by world W***** three with what Chuck Palunuik wrote with pornagraphers? Like me being on the lower run of the whorearchy with its on social dynamics at play of all the way people seem to not pay attention to this blog, consumer my porn then go about their business? With that legeles of no politics, wanting only entertainment?

Is that it?

Well, rhetorically of course, there's the way I have to address sexcess of those who are discreet about what they enjoy, with their kinks that I have to address, it's like this wild west that I'm going to live in will have to see how others are paying attention.

It's like those kink accounts that post only porn to a marketing efficiency standpoint, yet I'm not optimised, I can't fit in a mold, being an intellectual with many foundherent believes ain't out of his Cascoon yet of discovering that I'm a freak who like with my Marxism.

Oh well, you follow doctrines, your article, and you're done.

W*****-Archy

Sexcess

Sexcess, that people only value me for my sexual performance. (If you ab-test a website enough, it will turn into a porn site.)

There, uncensored the word porn now, I'm done.

I'll keep track of Intellectexual, she may have some ignorant assumptions regarding with how deep I am in the beep boops, yet it will all pass.

No politics = legelese recursive product of Governance

I'll steel man this then give a balanced take. On such a unbinding, unenforced legalese. Non state sanctioned.

In the void of the internet, there is no duty, no service, the long tail of distribution. From the pundit pot stirrers, to the Kardashians trying to look their concept of cute. Yet, social media is sold to the advertisers or the society of subscriptions. Vendors, serviceability.

It shows that this could be an entertainer, not a lecturer of governance, education, journalism, religion . Focusing on televisual rather than typographic expression; showmanship.

Since fiction is the legalese used for state protection for specific expression, not natural law.

This may suspend proselytisation and ideological presumptions of the viewer. All being part of a campaign.

So no controversy, politics imply two states at tension'n conflict. Along with fictional drama being within the subject. That's a charitable view. Keeping one's head down from the pot-stirring provocateur.

However, it's like a butler saying "It's not my job to have an opinion" it does bring questions, since it is not natural law anyhow.

I cannot tell the intentions of such an entertainment-ese layer. Since Interpretation and scrutiny of the media is used to help provide meaning. All the ideological presumptions will be guessed and speculated on, along with whether it being direct like satire or propaganda.

Whatever we reach and whatever we think. (Such as the clock metaphor, clock is the measurements of matter, the sociology of goals to tell the time.)

Right reasons, wrong reasons, undefined! Wow. Interpretation can matter.

I think of this writer snippet alot.

Things I agree/disagree of Stephanie: Moving on.

Interest wanes and falls

Because i'm not a gamer! ohh, maybe i'll snoop in your podcast and five years. I'm a freelance contract worker who happens to do

I agree with him with licensing here along up until AI which I'm not sure he's clarified about. I'm sure he's mislead. Legitmate fears, well, enjoy a lot of dildos and adult themes in this.
(Dildo references), Lot's of sex toys

I can't find myself enjoying 95% cases of licence. Wish it was consistent.

Replace EA with 'Disney' and replace customers with Independent artists. Class analysis and dialectical materialism.

Despite my disagreements, I did enjoy his video on Bogwarts. All of them. Well, Even Peter Coffin has words on that.

It goes south with her reaction to the AI thought, Peter Coffin, Alexander Avile, Sunny'm Cheax, Andy Masley have responded better.

Now I'll see if I can make with Peter Coffin, being the citizen investigator I will have to see his own way with the ai. Oh She's wrong on NFTS too. So, I must do my bid adieu as a customer and not follow.

Getting too moral panicky.

So Commodified it vaporises thought

Be careful what media input you take.

Mass commodified content designed for kiddies evaporates from my brain from how easy consumable it is, guess the big-wigs knew, doing some thinking. I can't remember a Mr Beast video.

Well, it's not for me. Kids do love it, Not going to Junophobia it though, this is a thing with social media though, everybody comes and run it down to the ground, from everypart.

Guess FlazzFire has gone the edutainment route and deciding on to be a comedian, taking the vulgarism with it and writing like Chuck Palunuik. 

My fave part of this collage.

I'll keep following him. Cussy as it is, not as Academically rigorous. Welp, that's the problem with the plot/spectacle of Aristotle.

Fuzzy mirage of mental models/literacy/illiteracy

Happy Halloween! Here's a off-the-cuff essay by a philosophy student wanting literacy.

Yet I know I'll have to deal with mass communicating towards an illiterate audience outside.

What convinced me was Neil postman. Even with my Art Director brain that I have to learn at literacy, I haven't had to chance to read all the socialism books so that's why some of my feed are videos, so even if I'm not literate, I'm aware of the changing concepts closely rela

Otherwise, you get Vaush, missed that train, or Ed Zitron.

I call this new strain the prosumer leftism, which is absorbed within itself of its own social media bubble. Or wilfully misinformed leftism.

Yet with the right/left graph and the political compass, I'm going to have to do another post on that.

Commentary on the Idea/use within education.

Educationist theory from Seth and this

Phrenology, and you are the product with prosumer ai-detection. 

Well, even with doctrinaires still madden me. Here's idea/expression dichotomy. The law does not protect genre, good one too. Idea's can't be selecting, they're collectively owned by the commons, and then there's the way that I'm going to happen. Expand the conception of copyright till it's impossible.

@amagire.bsky.social‬

whenever someone suggests that a webtool can detect AI images, I do check them against: 1. a digital illustration 100% hand drawn by me 2. a photomanipulation created by me 3. a video game screenshot, unedited and taken by me so far, not a single "AI detector" has ever got 2 out of 3 correct
that is WORSE THAN USELESS. "Determining which images have been created or altered with generative tools" isn't even a use case for gen-AI, somehow
okay, well, that's your right, OP, but just so you know the linked tools were: wasitai.com [failed 1 and 3, correctly identified 2 as "not AI"] and thehive.ai/apis/ai-gene... [failed 2, said 3 "might include some AI elements", correctly identified 1 as "not AI"]
usually I delete quote posts if the OP blocks me but I guess I'll let this one circulate, it's important to be aware of the limits of these apps. the best tool for detecting generated images and text is and remains: your human eyeballs. sorry

Magic bullet solutions

Video on educational applications.

Education industry complex, what are you going to do huh?

Additional bonus edit

Ding, mediocrity, reaction channels, movie response

 (There's a reference to gentilia storage.) Averages, I do not mind making a stream of consciousness response/reaction, yet at this time it's all meant to be forgiven. Time for another way.

You want to see a dead body?

Yet with all this computationalism, with Ai being the medium and the metaphor, it's now a claim ot explore this and how it's deplored. It's like we are in the stage of where with our media, it's becoming our metaphor with learning what it means to distribute our labour into our hands.

This content farm will continue and fix what is not broken. Delivering to their audience fast and cheaper, it's react-slop like them all.

Well, Thank you, Hume Is-ought gap, between exchange value and use value, and with direct response marketing and brand marketing in this age of information age.

Water is wet.

Radica, UBI, Foundherent / Right to to city tube feed

What's on the marxist labour theory of value tube today?
What's on the woob tube? I'll keep editorial control here and commitments.

In Couch Gregor attempts to have an opinion on statecraft. See this as the research scrapbook where I draw inspiration on where to fictionalize.

BadMouse, some say he's gone ideological shopping, I'd say he's become foundherent with the syncretism that we currently reside. I don't think his ML videos fully hit the mark, some still believe in it like the Finnish Bolshevik, I'm not. Can only wish the anarchist well as he goes his merry way with my own liberal to Ancom 

Really, it's all a journey, ain't it? I'm not like I have anything else to lose in these unauthorized.

Guess this is the alternative to the copyright, which require virality of exposure and advertisers within a computational prospecting for attention economy these days.

Tbh, Welfare > UBI, it's still too much of a libertarian idea even if it's tried in Ireland.

So this is the idea of the right to the city, well, that's the policy of decommodification along with the state-craft to be taken, do recommend following this chap.

These are all policy changes though, radical systemic changes that sow the seeds to the creeping, changing urbanism or our society that are meant for the community action. Be it for the quiet revolts that happen underneath this domain.

So with these contradictions that will form, they will happen, the foundherent resolving as these hierarchal, horizontal alignment of distribution. Wonder what Finnish Bolshevik is doing? Oh, Talking about dialectal materialism theory and atheism.

I wonder if I'll keep following, haven't gone through his body of work fully.

The amazing atheist happened to drop a video, and he was an opportunist, I decided to check out that video in the bibliography, it was edgy calling Sargon a pick me grifter. Honest with Thunderfoot and his Anita whining. Welp, Thank you for trying to do a cogent video.

Only I respected Daniel Dennet.

What's happening on 1dime? I watched this long-form essay, everbody is splitting off again.

Ah, Marxism, it may have disinformation or not.
Thanks anway 1dime, you may be called a liberal, yet I know doing edutainment for the masses could be a thing, even if some argue it's a stepping stone.

Now, here's the question, am I Marxist? I'm an entertainer first, not a fighter. Yet I know conflict theory has influenced many an action flick and provided tension, that's with Aristotle theory of the unity of opposites is.

Foundherent will be within the label though of what I do, into socialism.

So yeah, dialectical materialism only a means of anaylsis.

Can't follow, appeal to authority in Fitness Journalism

In the fitness news today, sombody I trusted ended falling down. I'm not surprised.
Since I'm perptually brought to be made to report on the fitness news, there a plenty of experts.

The problem with a doctorate is when somebody reads it, putting this here.

"This is the appeal not to the highest standard, it's the appeal to the lowest possible standard" Ouch. The largest mental model.

I don't follow the fitness drama that much, everybody loves drama because it fishes for the commodified attention, yet we know I'm going to serve you a snippet here since editorials here are meant to spill the tea, so here's the tea.

Everybody needs drama, everybody wants tantrums, everybody wants something they editorialize about. According to some communities, nothing can editorialize about, yet one of the things that feels litigable (that's etymology for a tribunal, a tribe play'n quarrel) Then it's time, that's the quarrel of quarrels.)

Yet I did not care that much about Mike here and now.

Personally, I'll have to moderate the volume at my gym and hope that my hernia gets recovered.

Follow up, you don't have to watch, I ain't ya dad!

Sorry, Sometimes I like my slop'n clickbait. ( Or if somebody will call  Clear argumentation from a physicist. Stiring the pot. )

Wow, Another video, the series continues

It shows that I can't follow certain fitness influencers because it's not that elaborate, there's only so much when the industry of professionalism.

Pouring Bleach on my Epistemic Crisis

Pouring bleach down a toilet, to get rid of all the undesirables. This is the practice of doing editorials.

Aaah, punditry, the path of commitment, or of clownish pretentiousness. Gaming the attention economy, along with its feedback loops of freelance contract workers.

Such is the void/abyss, to divine in it.
So that follower list, that thing, undiscovered pouring and spring cleanings happen, unbeknowst of tiny unmeasured judgements, stuff beyond my purview right out of the grasp.

So time to be ameliorative! Time to consider both good and bad, then carry on.

Escaping the bleach titanic, cleaning everything. All this confusion, Epistemic crisis and hyperreality and all the mushy talking points, no leaders, all the silly talk, I'd have to trust a self or anatta, non-self to be proud off. All this financial computationalism in the air, it's all a malaise.