Mimicking high status. Critique of Status'n Immiseration

Where's the class distinction?

Well, this is tackling the Varn vlog on various arguments of signifiers. Leading to preferentialism of informal groups online, with digitized interactions of various belongings.

That the middle class and the managerial class lead into that off of status mimicking of higher classes to lead the development of infrastructure and of commercial law that will lead into that.

For such, though, the code of conduct such dialectics brought of oneself of the commercial law contingent, either of the desires of reaching an infinite moreness or the infinite desire to follow through with them. For this unmeasurable, non-physical infinity, the desire to fill an emptiness of lack is brought to lead into circles.

Circles of sharing. Circles of shaming, Circles of honour. (got poetic at the end)

Video in question. Got a lot on my mind right now.

Surgery prep, placebo time

Its going to get worse if I don't get this, and there's a chance that I'll be bedbound, and a 100 to 1 chance of complications. There may be a hose to draw out excess fluids; there will be at 7:30, where I'll inhale funny gas while getting that feeling of having half my guts slipping down my scrotum out of me. Along with the weird knots.

2 weeks of not exercising.

Do not want an artery cut and then bleed out. Yet this one is a professional. I'll be gowned and sleep and then wake up, right? Sleep and wake. Wake up with my guardian beside me.

Had this with the back teeth out, lower back teeth. 10 years it's been in and last year it was discovered.

Alan Thrall had a video on it; that cooled me.

Had to pull it back in with knots back on Friday. Sometimes it feels like metal brambles, sometimes it feels like a iron rod.

Ip demands an egoist view

One reason that I'm deflationary is the worship of knowledge that can lead into elitism.

Well, snobbery and self-assurance that I can't trust, not even myself, to seek to own up to any mediocrity along with complacency.

That's seeing any advancement of epistemology, or it's not that deep. Anyway, another unsolicited advice video.

On plot:Spectacle C.Dereck Varn

Memory of C.Dereck

This is a comment:

Being an entertainer, I can only find the concepts of Harlan Ellison's The Glass Teat inspiring to create literary entertainment. This concept aligns with Byung-Chul Han Cognitainment concept with my craft, I seek to make it into the creative commons. I can only assume our old copyright framework aids in this diffuse atomisation, like you said.

With all the cargo culting though.This may be the limits of our meliorism, granted with our social apparatus of these platform capitalists, left to our own devices to raise consciousness.

So I can only think of connection while still at the tension of these commodity relations as an edutainment creative class owning the means of production. Then carry on.

Seeing the normalised advertising and commodifying proffesion left to us, along with the subvertisement. The only thing on these platforms is locked within. It's arguable that with all this automated white-collar work now, it's going to first to go. It's a fascinating subject that came from aristotle of plot:spectcale, Robert Mckhee's argued in one of his craft books there is no distinction.

I guess we will have to move on with commodified para-social relationships from platform to platform. Thx for the talk, been doing my best to inform my praxis while not falling into the pragmatism traps.

More on entertainment, good and bad. I've read about:

Harlen Ellison's The Glass Teat 1+2 And his speech on toilets
Byung-Chul Han's The Good Entertainment > Those are goof
Robert McKee Character
Nicolas D Villarreal a soul of a new type

David Foster Wallace talk on consumerism > mid
The Attention merchants : Tim Wu

Neil Postman on Amusing Ourselves to Death and Technopoly. ( I don't know how long those ideas have lasted) >Negative

-

"plot should be kept under house arrest" Okay fake advice.

Unrelated pic of Tiger Sato, sketch for birthday.

Stephen King said that. Or well, Mr Beast claims to do it, yet the illiterate kids merely watch his business model with his luck.

Story, narratology, all that. Organisation of thought leading into a structure of surprise of play, and not to cheat, with that design intent in mind. To make the unsuspected suspected, or that's what the paradox with fictional suspense belief is. Or the long attempt to play with build-up

Is the be in the leif a aspiration of character and the becoming of that? Virtue ethics-wise.

Cheating with social media'n all that attempt to lower suspense by instant gratification with porn, I've done it myself.

If you know, you know.

The element of surprise and plot, to the modern day, still reminds.

The liar's paradox and all with that chagrin

Here's another Kyle video. With truth/false being explored ( Oh, do recommend that movie)

On vulgar Auteurism, Vulgar style/genre

Kyle Kallgren likes to be the critic of literary auteurs. Or the art director/producer running the show and their vision.

Yes, even with style, even with genre, one can still be bad.

Axiology does not care about the legalese pf
the front cover, the performance the the resonance which follows after, beyond the natural law.

So that from court of law to public. It remains the distinction of low and high still. It can be suspended to serve plenty of stimulation.

Or YOU TEARING ME APART!! LISA WITH SYMBOLIC JUSTICE

video 🔻🛋 on the best/worst over-distributed vanity film. In the spirit of Robert Mcghee. Of the spectacular production and the founderent manueavuring through the industry. Deproffesional within the social media.

(Wonder where Kyles video will be next? I don't follow him.)

The drawbacks of ameliorations

What a self-flagellating spectacle.

Do better

Do better

Do better

Or is it status? A relative appeal? Scarcity or Connection?

"I nominate "do better" as the year's most irritating phrase. It's just so ______ entitled. _____ sitting around open jawed expecting content to be spoon-fed into their mouth, and then it's not exactly conforming to what they want, they complain from a pseudo position of higher morality. ____ off." @robmanual

Some British bloke I got from my feed.

I have to agree from the sentiment.

What's the case with the amount of social media wanting a better return of its direct response, what it takes to make it with business models, non-profit and such with the cost of living in contrast of the perverse incentives of social medias audience with publishers looming in the back.

Become a resource or not. Well, I dipped my toes in the pundit circuit and with that, with my own socialist leanings, they are not going to learn. With their own path, Can't reach everybody.

I'll leave this unedited video now

On Slurs

(Vulger cw) Oh have this non-disney scribble.

Yugopink and wowmao, I still pop in, as a sociologist to check qualitative status signals and in-group out-group dynamics, this is good video.

Bimbo used to be racist, now used by sex workers as copyrighting to commodify their bodies, go figure.

The absurdity of superiority, of the simplest of hierarchy of wanting to fit in within what is to be picked by a community or the way these groups govern informally, of trying to push for a group cohesiveness. With such a manner though with all mob rule, with the weight of the slurs and the hollowness of them, then it's from history that barbarity that core is held to together.

(( Post edit, Yugopink slipped up in microblogers, called on mental deficiency. Nit pink by Peter Coffin. This was before that. ))

Debate aggro

I haven't been found out by them yet, with my positions, with my ideas being blacklisted.

All part of the business of being rejected.

So, what happens when it comes to trolls who aggro and seek clout, then it's time to deny. Between status seeking and the status rejection (Recursive status move in of itself) then it's a go ahead that we are the times of our those who attack.

Those who is a doctrinaire

Those who bully

Thoe who trantrum

Welp, Seth? What do you have to say about trolls? With your public domain contribution?

 My feed may need curating again, from spammers and troll.

Have a video.

I dive in the black culture, Josh Johnstone and FD Signifier.

In the words of Josh Johnson "Art can save your life. But entertainment will never be your salvation." Sinners, I see.

Still following F.D Signifier, his one on Charlie Kirk had quite the intro. So this is the video where he goes into the Hollywood and vertical integrated media does to independent creatives. Oh the hacknification of it all. So that's being the welcome to the machine all over again.

I don't know if I'm an ally or not, I'll leave that to the black communities
to decide.

I'm in the autistic beep boop culture, learning disability. Along with trying to sort that mess, that's where I'm positioned amongst the community map.

F.d Signifiers makes culture preserving, even with that wrong ai water take he did. Even if he goes deep into the silly ends of hating the prosumer spectacle, which i seem to ignore, which others have taken a anti-vax like conspiracy mindset too. I'm hiding with the catgirl open sourcers till a lot of the smoke passes through.

Paul Klee

Those were by another hand. The last two. Anonymous of outsider art.

What's one Kyro's box? Part 2

Two Recommendations as filler.

Polemics?? Governance? Even that liberal Seth has takes on it??
 
Accurate takes on Marxist Leninist governments that take the history seriously?

Collage?

What's on Theos?

Arguments for the pressupostionalism of god?? Nagel's Contingent and arbitrariness. 3 hours for those who have blessed to share it.

Play/serious, the book of play

The essay on play/seriousness Fast/slow.

5 stars.

Play

Between Illusion and reality.

To move, and to stand still, Etymologically from the fast and slow.

The slow plot and the fast spectacle. We dance with it. I can see why it inspired my play though. Aristotle as the tension with all the aspects that make our minds dance with the matter of understanding how it constructs our society and civilisation.

This read left me with hope how a concept effects us, infrastructure and urbanism with the products of our capitalism and industrialism has given us many benefits and many liabilities. Advantages and disadvantages. Something in the back of our minds with eudaemonia, quality of life and the cost of living.

Guess that's the narrative mindset, leaving him with respect of our institutions and organisations From dispersion of tension to the creation of it, two poles. Moving us forward.

This is the video that inspired my reading.

Ode to the Meme time

Abstract expressionist bwomph.

 Memeplexs

One thing social media has done, which is nice. Is memes.

The only idea and concept that Richard Dawkins every contributed to our culture, with communal expressions that lead to heuristics of better understanding of civilisation, or more heuristics.

Other ideas, such a study of meme, and the meme machine are better books on this phomonoa imo.

Quibbles, Jreg endorsement, already he may have normalised bad treatments.

Too much glazing of Richard Dawkins, the only one which I liked of the four horseman of the atheism was Daniel Dennet.

Now share along, those transcendent of the Draconian IP laws, spread away and fall through the ideas of all the ways into the art of collage and in the see of the cyberspace.

Swoosh!

The cohort of the beep-boopers.

 Beep boop

I'm a bot

Beep boop

Bot goes beep boop

Beep boop boy, beep boop

beep boop son.

beep boop

On Beep_Boop an honest investigation of fanaticism

- La Resistance independent -

- Sociological report start -

So what's your opinion on LLMS?

Your incredibly opinionated manner you himbo waltz into
The due diligence for your [ Perfect coherent interpretation here ]

Thats most divinely reconciliatory.
Okay serious.

Short answer: My position is sociologically with the epistemics of Susan Haack, Henry Ferrel, Abi Awomosu, aesthetically Masamune Shirow, intepretability from Matteo Pasquinelli. Discard the malpractice didney lawyers with culture war kruft. Digi-ethics research is like that within OSS.

Yet I'm too ahead of this when I knew the terminally stuck in the presentism so I'm keeping it here.
Jeremy Bentham with the discourse being stuck within sunk costs within america
"If you want to know how AI will affect the world, don’t imagine current AIs simply continuing on into the future. Imagine the world being flooded by AIs that make our current models look like a child’s plaything—and those being used to build the next generation of AI. Imagine, for the first time, creating something much smarter than humans. I don’t know exactly what’s coming down the pipeline, but it will be strange and terrifying. We are summoning digital aliens into our world, and we are not ready, and we are complaining about the water they’ll drink."

Some politely unfollow me at this point. That's good enough, wading in with options undiscovered is part of the price of connectionism we exist.

Medium Answer:

This by Alice

It's a mixed review of the various critics of the venture capitalists and brings it's own conclusion of a solapunk/scrapunk. Garrison Lovely has a decisive take on Ed Zitron. I've had my own commentary with that model collapse.

Reading this essay and coming to your own conclusions with the overall thing. Since I'll cover all the philosophical positioning and typology.

Oh, Kirby has a video too.

"Most AI debates aren’t really about evidence. Instead, they’re arguments about futures that none of us have seen.

Nobody has seen superintelligence, a machine that most people agree is conscious, or a fully automated economy. Evidence can be gathered, but it underdetermines the conclusion. To fill the gap, we fall back on a combination of philosophy, political intuitions or, in some cases, tribal identity."

Long Answer:

Welcome, sceptics and hyper-believers. 👋🛋

Refutations to respect polysemy of a new age to end the dogmatic eristics of a fantastical boycott. Of vulgar critical theory 💪🛋⭐

The intellectual case. Away from the prosumer

metrology outside.

This embarrassment of praxis ends here.

To the end of the art hall monitors with their false historiography. To point a finger at the AI denial industry too.

A doxastic space this blind dogma ends here. Couch Gregor is angry. 🛋🔎 He'll do an investigation.

With Gags. Then, like Ghost in the shell illustrator, you'll know his position.

"But Couch Gregor, what do you mean you with the code word draw buff dudes

in tho-"

Done intuitively and counterintuitively.
~

Yes Kevin, I will go down to the dogmas that are presupposed with their precious, oh precious entertainment. Trivially true into the future.

is its useless/usefull? Valueable/worthless? Model/medium?

Whatever valence to put [derogatory slur] or [laudatory commendation]?
🛋🔎🔎🔎

Look at all those cartesian maps! Andy Masley bottom and Tree of Woe bottom right.

It's polysemic. Orthagonal. A big splotch

on the political map!🍅
So a go-go with non-expert couch Gregor.

1

Historical dungeon and AI Dungeon before things were innocent.

(well earlier than that) Since computation has begun.

It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse-engineering accidents involving Dall-E.

all of it was simple before

A call for beep_boop preparationism. No dog in the race. To end the ignorant assumptions, I must dive into the double consciousness of the artisan class. To that, with the couch gregor explains his multiple poistion.

Then a naughty publicity stunt.

It began.

Then after Alexander Avila, I'm like, why are we fighting? This factionalism or fandom had started. This is leading into a second-opinion bias encouraged by social media.

“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. ”- John Steinbeck

So the temporally embarrassed double consciousness of the copywriter/graphic designers of centralised media.

Then Twitter became X, and then a spectacle happened. The Disney happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it; now it's a mess. The trolls have become snobbified. Something open source nominally got labelled as anti-centralisation. A false base for dialectics is not a way to go for it to be anti-worker. Such is the bad epistemology that had lead to this to seep of the brute truth to the power of the intellectuals and academics biting back at the entertainment industry.

Yet now..

We must have a discussion about this.

and I've had my investigations. My labels will have come and gone nominally.

Now that, as a preparationist, I suggest you hold onto your cushions. This one is going beyond the Ed Zitron, and Cory Doctorow.

When Propriety DRM hits, Moral panic washing.

I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.

... This nsfw gag

Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers. 

Deontological application? If a cost that would not even work? <Article of a chief ecomonist btw.

No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?

Reading this free open university course of criminology

Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?

Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.

(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)

Moral entrepreneur is such a good term 🛋️💭

Reassembled/reinstatement rather than Replaced (2026) labour protection plan

 As I try to have an opinion (no opinions allowed on Twitter, 'artist') of being reassembled rather than being replaced. Multiple interpretations, then a conclusion.

Let tackle the horrible topic of job loss and try to keep it civil. With the lowering rate of profit.

So Heya, journeyman graphic designers, commercial copywriters and software designers. Along with Games, VSX and other artists. Here's me steelmanning your concerns and trying to reassure, yet I can't sell you reassurance; I'm not a coachman of reassurance. I'm a himbo who's trying to give his best answer.

This is all speculative, so we're wading into territory where I'll go.

"Their fate is the subject of this essay, and a lens to think through the implications of AI for work with a bit more nuance than “LLMs are a scam” or “white collar work is doomed.” Perhaps those all-or-nothing predictions will turn out to be right! But honestly I doubt it. Instead I think it will be messy, confusing, exciting, strange, unfair and apparently irrational, just like it was last time."

Wow! WOWAAWAA labour and symbolic capital are in a loop! That's with all the things with the land

This has a first response, going back and forth by the Sky News man.
Also, one of the last copywriters, on functionalism, that man fell through. Although, I'll see what comes.

I'll link that copyrighter one here. To feel the fear of things ahead.

(We know hand skills will be least affected; James Gurney did a good post on it. So those craft skills.)

Plopyright hate post by Bintendo

Hopefully nobody proselytises with the doctrinaires. All the erotica about it is vastly superior to that business model. Well,

Worst thing about copyright is reducing all ideologies of art into transacting a monopoly to a publisher, that's not art. That outcome ain't the top of the algorithm of our attention of all the hits (Although I do get it, otherwise it's the fire hose kind of situation.)

Gift economies (that don't exist.) Pro bono work (Professional stuff) and Alternative means of models that don't mean being subservient to reactionary capital. Copyright is the biggest defence of monopoly, so it's necessary that is hides behind it.

Some Bluesky posts I've been collecting..

Retweet
‪@wwahammy.com‬· 3mo
Copyright is the most anti-worker invention ever. It allows companies to demand writers do free work and then decide after the fact whether they want to pay for it.
Lawyer>
‪Meredith Rose‬ ‪@mrose.ink‬· 3mo
COPYRIGHT IS NOT LABOUR PROTECTION. COPYRIGHT HAS BEEN ABSOLUTE DOG**** AS LABOR PROTECTION FOR THE LAST 400 YEARS PASS LABOUR LAWS. STOP ASKING COPYRIGHT TO FIX THE WORLD

Oh well, With a fandom, it's licensing malpractices with charity and other events, it's not something I'd like to flirt with. This video may sum it up, yet there's the amount of distrust to add to my reason of why am I not a gamer.

There's a continued insistence to enjoy toys and the pleasure principle.

Welp

https://www.suedbynintendo.com/ for all the litigious malpractices

This is what a monopoly without antitrust does to you folks: litigious malpractice.

(Bonus)

This has been going on for years with such a controversy. From the 1970's of the demonology of copyright. Twenty-page document of lectures of the thoughts.