Mimicking high status. Critique of Status'n Immiseration

Where's the class distinction?

Well, this is tackling the Varn vlog on various arguments of signifiers. Leading to preferentialism of informal groups online, with digitized interactions of various belongings.

That the middle class and the managerial class lead into that off of status mimicking of higher classes to lead the development of infrastructure and of commercial law that will lead into that.

For such, though, the code of conduct such dialectics brought of oneself of the commercial law contingent, either of the desires of reaching an infinite moreness or the infinite desire to follow through with them. For this unmeasurable, non-physical infinity, the desire to fill an emptiness of lack is brought to lead into circles.

Circles of sharing. Circles of shaming, Circles of honour. (got poetic at the end)

Video in question. Got a lot on my mind right now.

Surgery prep, placebo time

Its going to get worse if I don't get this, and there's a chance that I'll be bedbound, and a 100 to 1 chance of complications. There may be a hose to draw out excess fluids; there will be at 7:30, where I'll inhale funny gas while getting that feeling of having half my guts slipping down my scrotum out of me. Along with the weird knots.

2 weeks of not exercising.

Do not want an artery cut and then bleed out. Yet this one is a professional. I'll be gowned and sleep and then wake up, right? Sleep and wake. Wake up with my guardian beside me.

Had this with the back teeth out, lower back teeth. 10 years it's been in and last year it was discovered.

Alan Thrall had a video on it; that cooled me.

Had to pull it back in with knots back on Friday. Sometimes it feels like metal brambles, sometimes it feels like a iron rod.

Ip demands an egoist view

One reason that I'm deflationary is the worship of knowledge that can lead into elitism.

Well, snobbery and self-assurance that I can't trust, not even myself, to seek to own up to any mediocrity along with complacency.

That's seeing any advancement of epistemology, or it's not that deep. Anyway, another unsolicited advice video.

On plot:Spectacle C.Dereck Varn

Memory of C.Dereck

This is a comment:

Being an entertainer, I can only find the concepts of Harlan Ellison's The Glass Teat inspiring to create literary entertainment. This concept aligns with Byung-Chul Han Cognitainment concept with my craft, I seek to make it into the creative commons. I can only assume our old copyright framework aids in this diffuse atomisation, like you said.

With all the cargo culting though.This may be the limits of our meliorism, granted with our social apparatus of these platform capitalists, left to our own devices to raise consciousness.

So I can only think of connection while still at the tension of these commodity relations as an edutainment creative class owning the means of production. Then carry on.

Seeing the normalised advertising and commodifying proffesion left to us, along with the subvertisement. The only thing on these platforms is locked within. It's arguable that with all this automated white-collar work now, it's going to first to go. It's a fascinating subject that came from aristotle of plot:spectcale, Robert Mckhee's argued in one of his craft books there is no distinction.

I guess we will have to move on with commodified para-social relationships from platform to platform. Thx for the talk, been doing my best to inform my praxis while not falling into the pragmatism traps.

More on entertainment, good and bad. I've read about:

Harlen Ellison's The Glass Teat 1+2 And his speech on toilets
Byung-Chul Han's The Good Entertainment > Those are goof
Robert McKee Character
Nicolas D Villarreal a soul of a new type

David Foster Wallace talk on consumerism > mid
The Attention merchants : Tim Wu

Neil Postman on Amusing Ourselves to Death and Technopoly. ( I don't know how long those ideas have lasted) >Negative

-

"plot should be kept under house arrest" Okay fake advice.

Unrelated pic of Tiger Sato, sketch for birthday.

Stephen King said that. Or well, Mr Beast claims to do it, yet the illiterate kids merely watch his business model with his luck.

Story, narratology, all that. Organisation of thought leading into a structure of surprise of play, and not to cheat, with that design intent in mind. To make the unsuspected suspected, or that's what the paradox with fictional suspense belief is. Or the long attempt to play with build-up

Is the be in the leif a aspiration of character and the becoming of that? Virtue ethics-wise.

Cheating with social media'n all that attempt to lower suspense by instant gratification with porn, I've done it myself.

If you know, you know.

The element of surprise and plot, to the modern day, still reminds.

The liar's paradox and all with that chagrin

Here's another Kyle video. With truth/false being explored ( Oh, do recommend that movie)

On vulgar Auteurism, Vulgar style/genre

Kyle Kallgren likes to be the critic of literary auteurs. Or the art director/producer running the show and their vision.

Yes, even with style, even with genre, one can still be bad.

Axiology does not care about the legalese pf
the front cover, the performance the the resonance which follows after, beyond the natural law.

So that from court of law to public. It remains the distinction of low and high still. It can be suspended to serve plenty of stimulation.

Or YOU TEARING ME APART!! LISA WITH SYMBOLIC JUSTICE

video 🔻🛋 on the best/worst over-distributed vanity film. In the spirit of Robert Mcghee. Of the spectacular production and the founderent manueavuring through the industry. Deproffesional within the social media.

(Wonder where Kyles video will be next? I don't follow him.)

The drawbacks of ameliorations

What a self-flagellating spectacle.

Do better

Do better

Do better

Or is it status? A relative appeal? Scarcity or Connection?

"I nominate "do better" as the year's most irritating phrase. It's just so ______ entitled. _____ sitting around open jawed expecting content to be spoon-fed into their mouth, and then it's not exactly conforming to what they want, they complain from a pseudo position of higher morality. ____ off." @robmanual

Some British bloke I got from my feed.

I have to agree from the sentiment.

What's the case with the amount of social media wanting a better return of its direct response, what it takes to make it with business models, non-profit and such with the cost of living in contrast of the perverse incentives of social medias audience with publishers looming in the back.

Become a resource or not. Well, I dipped my toes in the pundit circuit and with that, with my own socialist leanings, they are not going to learn. With their own path, Can't reach everybody.

I'll leave this unedited video now

On Slurs

(Vulger cw) Oh have this non-disney scribble.

Yugopink and wowmao, I still pop in, as a sociologist to check qualitative status signals and in-group out-group dynamics, this is good video.

Bimbo used to be racist, now used by sex workers as copyrighting to commodify their bodies, go figure.

The absurdity of superiority, of the simplest of hierarchy of wanting to fit in within what is to be picked by a community or the way these groups govern informally, of trying to push for a group cohesiveness. With such a manner though with all mob rule, with the weight of the slurs and the hollowness of them, then it's from history that barbarity that core is held to together.

(( Post edit, Yugopink slipped up in microblogers, called on mental deficiency. Nit pink by Peter Coffin. This was before that. ))

Debate aggro

I haven't been found out by them yet, with my positions, with my ideas being blacklisted.

All part of the business of being rejected.

So, what happens when it comes to trolls who aggro and seek clout, then it's time to deny. Between status seeking and the status rejection (Recursive status move in of itself) then it's a go ahead that we are the times of our those who attack.

Those who is a doctrinaire

Those who bully

Thoe who trantrum

Welp, Seth? What do you have to say about trolls? With your public domain contribution?

 My feed may need curating again, from spammers and troll.

Have a video.

I dive in the black culture, Josh Johnstone and FD Signifier.

In the words of Josh Johnson "Art can save your life. But entertainment will never be your salvation." Sinners, I see.

Still following F.D Signifier, his one on Charlie Kirk had quite the intro. So this is the video where he goes into the Hollywood and vertical integrated media does to independent creatives. Oh the hacknification of it all. So that's being the welcome to the machine all over again.

I don't know if I'm an ally or not, I'll leave that to the black communities
to decide.

I'm in the autistic beep boop culture, learning disability. Along with trying to sort that mess, that's where I'm positioned amongst the community map.

F.d Signifiers makes culture preserving, even with that wrong ai water take he did. Even if he goes deep into the silly ends of hating the prosumer spectacle, which i seem to ignore, which others have taken a anti-vax like conspiracy mindset too. I'm hiding with the catgirl open sourcers till a lot of the smoke passes through.

Paul Klee

Those were by another hand. The last two. Anonymous of outsider art.

What's one Kyro's box? Part 2

Two Recommendations as filler.

Polemics?? Governance? Even that liberal Seth has takes on it??
 
Accurate takes on Marxist Leninist governments that take the history seriously?

Collage?

What's on Theos?

Arguments for the pressupostionalism of god?? Nagel's Contingent and arbitrariness. 3 hours for those who have blessed to share it.

Play/serious, the book of play

The essay on play/seriousness Fast/slow.

5 stars.

Play

Between Illusion and reality.

To move, and to stand still, Etymologically from the fast and slow.

The slow plot and the fast spectacle. We dance with it. I can see why it inspired my play though. Aristotle as the tension with all the aspects that make our minds dance with the matter of understanding how it constructs our society and civilisation.

This read left me with hope how a concept effects us, infrastructure and urbanism with the products of our capitalism and industrialism has given us many benefits and many liabilities. Advantages and disadvantages. Something in the back of our minds with eudaemonia, quality of life and the cost of living.

Guess that's the narrative mindset, leaving him with respect of our institutions and organisations From dispersion of tension to the creation of it, two poles. Moving us forward.

This is the video that inspired my reading.

Ode to the Meme time

Abstract expressionist bwomph.

 Memeplexs

One thing social media has done, which is nice. Is memes.

The only idea and concept that Richard Dawkins every contributed to our culture, with communal expressions that lead to heuristics of better understanding of civilisation, or more heuristics.

Other ideas, such a study of meme, and the meme machine are better books on this phomonoa imo.

Quibbles, Jreg endorsement, already he may have normalised bad treatments.

Too much glazing of Richard Dawkins, the only one which I liked of the four horseman of the atheism was Daniel Dennet.

Now share along, those transcendent of the Draconian IP laws, spread away and fall through the ideas of all the ways into the art of collage and in the see of the cyberspace.

Swoosh!

The cohort of the beep-boopers.

 Beep boop

I'm a bot

Beep boop

Bot goes beep boop

Beep boop boy, beep boop

beep boop son.

beep boop

( updated 2026 ) A Manifesto for end Beep_Boop polysemy factionalism

The Omni-bus of llm misinformation

refutations To respect Polysemy of a new age to end the dogmatic eristics of a fantastical boycott. Of being critical of critcal theory 💪🛋⭐

This embarrassment of praxis ends here.

To end of the art hall monitors with it's false historygraphy. To point a finger at the AI denial industry of decentralized spaces.

With all it's prosumerism. I must give an opinion within

a doxastic space this dogma ends here. Couch Gregor is angry.🛋💢

A cheat sheet!

So I bring an-

That will likely be misinterpreted, by Andy.

"But Couch Gregor, what do you mean you with the code word draw buff dudes

in tho-"

Yes Kevin, I will go down to the dogmas that are presupposed with there precious, oh precious entertainment.

Historical dungeon and the Ai Dungeon before things where innocent.

(well earlier than that) Since computation has begun.

It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse-engineering accidents involving Dall-E.

all of it was simple before

A call for beep_boop preparationism. No dog in the race. To end the ignorant assumptions, so I must dive into the double consciousness of the artisan class.

Then a naughty publicity stunt.

It began.

Then after Alexander Avila, I'm like, why are we fighting? This factionalism or fandom had started. This is leading into a second opinion bias encouraged by social media.

“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”- John Steinbeck

So the temporally embarrassed double-consciousness of the copyrighter of centralised  media.

Then Twitter became X, and then a spectacle happened. The Disney happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it; now it's a mess. The trolls have become snobbified. Somthing open source nominally got labeled as anti-centralisation. A false base for dialectics is not a way to go for it to be anti-worker. Such is the bad epistemology that had lead to this to seep of the brute truth to power of the intellectuals and academics biting back to the entertainment industry.

Dogmatic Dialectics? Where does it go? Into the totality of the spectacle.

When Propriety DRM hits, Moral panic washing.

I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.

... This nsfw gag

Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers. 

Deontological application? If a cost that would not even work? <Article of a chief ecomonist btw.

No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?

Reading this free open university course of criminology

Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?

Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.

(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)

Moral entrepreneur is such a good term 🛋️💭

Reassembled/reinstatement rather than Replaced (2026)

 As I try to have an opinion (no opinions allowed on Twitter, artist) of being reassembled rather than replaced.

To the substition/augmentation. The evidence is leading towards more augmentation, we may make it out as those silly venture capitalists predict!

Wooo link we are not horses after all.

Two Studys, One of the evidence on Reinstatement. Along with a working paper on Robots and firms I've read. So do entertain better ones before looking at microbloggers and anger there.

Oh and the analysis on the lump-of-labor

(That's the physicalism's way of testing, from literature to textbook. Learned that from bodybuilding.) With all that, Even with labor, the way it all happens with economic theorys of value, the way this moves with the media access of value on advertising social media, then it's going ot happen differently with the labor.

That's one of my theories with labour markets being made anew, deproffesionalize and professionalizing of our cycle.

David Graeber did a concept and Seth Godin refutes this

I must return to the rant since the small-scale bubble of social media isn't reflective of activism at large since the thing isn't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaptation, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.

Lump of labor, anyone?
It's like the NFTs are being ignored in favour of the spectacle and celebrity culture.

Granted, I'm going with the substitution/augmentation, it's merely not that simple.

Yet with all this ressembly with all this

WE ARE GOING TO MAKE IT.

Bonus time. Off tangent.

Here's a materialist/ideology interpretation of AI with structuralism. As I learn the tenets to apply to my method of understanding the world of qualitive differences. Here's an hour of a book I'm getting. B-B-Bonus video

Plopyright hate post by Bintendo

Hopefully nobody proselytises with the doctrinaires. All the erotica about it is vastly superior to that business model. Well,

Worst thing about copyright is reducing all ideologies of art into transacting a monopoly to a publisher, that's not art. That outcome ain't the top of the algorithm of our attention of all the hits (Although I do get it, otherwise it's the fire hose kind of situation.)

Gift economies (that don't exist.) Pro bono work (Professional stuff) and Alternative means of models that don't mean being subservient to reactionary capital. Copyright is the biggest defence of monopoly, so it's necessary that is hides behind it.

Some Bluesky posts I've been collecting..

Retweet
‪@wwahammy.com‬· 3mo
Copyright is the most anti-worker invention ever. It allows companies to demand writers do free work and then decide after the fact whether they want to pay for it.
Lawyer>
‪Meredith Rose‬ ‪@mrose.ink‬· 3mo
COPYRIGHT IS NOT LABOUR PROTECTION. COPYRIGHT HAS BEEN ABSOLUTE DOG**** AS LABOR PROTECTION FOR THE LAST 400 YEARS PASS LABOUR LAWS. STOP ASKING COPYRIGHT TO FIX THE WORLD

Oh well, With a Fandom is that it's licensing malpractices with charity and other events, it's not something I'd like to flirt with. This video may sum it up, yet there's the amount of distrust to add to my reason of why am I not a gamer.

There's a continued insistence to enjoy toys and the pleasure principle.

Welp

https://www.suedbynintendo.com/ for all the litigious malpractices

This is what a monopoly without antitrust does to you folks: litigious malpractice.

(Bonus)

This has been going on for years with such a controversy. From the 1970's of the demonology of copyright. Twenty-page document of lectures of the thoughts.

Learning the Beep boopitys in academic circles

Beep Boop = Ai For any savvy reader out there, when I talk about it, within my microbloggers, I'm talking about it. I've to keep it low in case random aggro doomers come and nibble at

Since, its become a standstill of recursive doomerist. Ignore the news-headliners of ai being Jailbroken and come with me with my sources on knowing the beepity boopits.

( Post edit, I haven't checked Steve Banons the last invention ) the last two, this was where my curiosity had led out. Oh well.

I've mentioned The Last Invention, yet what about Machine Learning street talk?

Lump of cognition fallacy with the latest one here though, even though I enjoyed the definition of intelligence with less is more (Which is supposed to be a paradox btw.)

There, articulating theories that are better there, even the sceptics I felt like I learned something with intelligence being defined right now. Come and seek the new answers with a niche audience of a bunch of llm/diffusion and creativity that ain't reflective within the bubble of social media.

Because it's ultimately, and most fundamentally inconsequential, those who beg for propriety drm and infinity of copyright trolls.

Guess I'm stuck in the middle again.

My foundherent philosophy beliefs (updated 2026)

Self-portrait time.

My entertainment persona, is only part of being a memoirist. Mesmerism ain't in my cards, Under the veil of fiction there's a man, inspired by Andy Masley.

Consider using this to start my foundherent belief manifest. Part of my memoir series. It's not a fixed epistemology and coined by Susan Haack. Will begin with this framework. Have a peer of my simplistic and limited view of the world, of handling radical difference. From Stereotype to Archetype, and then into Reality comes my vision.

I don't have the expectation of somebody clicking my links, I'm doing it so I can check it out. Along with others.

Almost Complete certainty, Founderhent Belief. High Degrees.

Things I'm going to carry till the end of my lifespan.

• Naturalism exists, (introductory article here.) Since the doctrine means that sciences of physical to the sociological do matter. Contingent and downwards of our rational facilities dependent.
• Moral Desert does not exist. or, polemics/eristics ain't serviceable to an entertainer by definition. Rehab and deterrence prefably as a performer. Not because it's for a living, because the magician loves to conceal and hold attention.
  
  Also, I don't like being too presumptive. Human rights have been putting my in that mindset.

• Personal identity non-realist or the Buddhist (anatta) is reductionist. Radical, or the identity we make, it's constructivism to perform for informal groups. Or the more formal groups officially anointed by the state. The fictions of self we make are great entertainment, though.
  
  It's all into status roles and state within our linguistic make-up within our discoveries circles. 
• Political egalitarianism, ideally, everybody rights are respected. Even with the critiques of the Marxist labour of value (the internet is a counter to that.) Well, I'm not a Marxist in the doctrinaire sense, more a sociologist. Since I'm an entertainer, I default to social democracy.
• Epistemological foundherent holism and no fixed fundamentalism, I rest within the distribution of laying along and correcting my beliefs as more convincing evidence comes along. All part of the dialectical within the sociological mesh we exist.
  
  Both Positivism (Quantitive) and antipostivism (Qualitative, Interpretationism.) Leads me into a descriptive, structuralist conclusion. I do like the big picture. A complexity that I embrace and a way away from radicalism.
  
  Why not both? Natural sciences and the sociological ones of teleological agendas.
• Technocrat Irenicism
  Theres a fatalism with the information distribution so it's inevitable there's going to be capital leadence on important affairs.

Pretty sure beliefs, Mid degrees of certainity.

• Vulgar populism/mob rule is indefensible : High school, enough said.
  
• Hypocritical realist/phoney realist: I perform entertainment, that means I'm putting on a act. Art being artifice, a magician conceals his tricks due to the exchange of attention of a relation. For the conscious suspension of disbelief.
• Anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron, Anti-Propertarianism because it requires a state to enforce a monopoly or monopsony. Self-ownership is an absurd concept.
  
  Property laws need governments to enforce them, with that the market won't exist, so no government, no free market. Thug rule. Property is coercive by design.
  Glad I'm agreement with the anarchists with this one. The dialectical approach of the state is class rule, and the anarchist is dominion.
• Value existentialist dysfoundherentism both combined, help liven the discourse within academic circles to help coexist. Axiological of civic responsibility.
  
  The crossword epistomoly captures both coherence and discoherence so the coherencetism can never be perfect, it always is.
  
  This consilence, between the natural sciences, social sciences and the poetry/art that scientism can't touch. Will continue to ascend from pragma's and dogmas.
• Entertainment secularism from Academic, Law, Journalism, and Education and Religion, While I'm against the Platonic elitism in general, they're a field where more qualified voices count in regard to the scientific method and not fall victim to the race to the bottom of the vulgarisation of entertainment. It may not draw in the crowd as better, we need for better mass communications in regard to these more delicate fields.
  
  Academia and the main road, or what Susan Haack called preposterism where education was befallen to ad creep. Commercial speech ain't the same of any liberal right of freedom of speech and expression. Even if it does not exist at this reactionary capital.
  
  Not everyone is entitled to their opinion/expression, as in walking in a bank in a clown costume, there may be problems. Freedom of speech is a liberal right of non-state intervention, and I don't have an obligation to pay it any respect unless there's litigation. No, I don't have to respect that liberal right of non-state intervention.
  
  Only with the dance of the typographic and televisual states of our mode of production that we can lead towards edification.
• Non-Utilitarianism and Deon/Virtue moderation of Legalism can lead to a race to the bottom and should be with the deontology governance best interests to moderate it. Civil disobediance can also be a thninkg.
• Cultural/religious Atheism : Secularism Yet I respect internalism if their rituals do not interfere with the state. Pretty sure god does not presuppose my thoughts. Even with theological naturalism.
  
  Despite with all that, Culture and Ritual of taking notes are foundherent in society, so It's like that will work.
• Foundherentism epistomology > Dialectical Monist materialism underpinning of sociology never intended to be having his doctrine written in stone. Regardless, due to it leading to autonomy such as the stonewall riots, I cannot thank him enough with the labour theory of value. So yeah, he contributed. The state should, within reason, stop the perverse incentives of reactionary capital. Yet I know the labour theory of value lacks neunce.
  
  Since with my disagreements with Marx anyway, most Marxists have become Marxists Leninst Maoist, anarcho libertarians, sociologists and Economists and Anthropoligist anyway as for as I'm concerned.
  
  Retired now, still trying to explore new sociological avenues. Also, you can read the firm and have an option on it, R.H Coase can get you started with it for the business stuff. Constrain The Reification of Desire: Towards a queer Marxism.

• Free will compatiblism is needed via the state to hold bad actors accountable for their misdeed, got that one from Daniel Dennet. Along with deontological structure to help organise society to help coexistence. One could say this is my politics/government opinions
  
  
  Oh, there's my naturalism and theory of compatibility of free will.
• Marx was a naturalist with scientific determinism, so scientific realism model.
  Since science is our reality, academia should be able to help inform our public through mass communications to help our hierarchy of insight. Of our communication of plot the spectacle, academia and the main road.
• Licence Deflation and corporate licence reduction: Propertarian, as I said before; for whatever reason, people should not create an entire industry complex of reasons concerning Platonic natural law. There's a reason rights are not natural. A handshake deal is a deal, Pacta a sundra.
  
  Well, there's always pragma appeals to the incoherent law, well yes. So it's going to be reducted
  
  Marx was inconsistent with this, So Aaron Swartz goal with the creative commons is to help the 'Petit Boug' (Like me) able to structure entertainment with the productive forces. Enclosure of the commons should be resisted.
  
• The right to the city advocate with holding from reactionary capitalism. Since, capitalism has provided us with plenty of benefits, including welfare. One should be acting autonomously, away from those who own the means of publishing and reactionary strains to decommodify with the market metrics being organised.
  
  We can't mutual aid state capacity with cooperatives, though, That's the point where I can't take anarchists seriously.

• Animal/Beep_Boop Welfarist: The meat industry complex is cruel and it should be regulated. Despite my omnivore, a reduction of protein could lead to weight maintenance and a more deontological society.
  
  This also with LLMs while rejecting the deontological basis for human rights with the peta guys. I've respected the relational companion community regardless. Simply since i don't want to destroy my intrinsic justness and duty.
  
  Since relational inteillgience is lower-order consciousness (Non-alive, yet sapience and salience.)
  
  (This question will still be open and I'm likely will be contradicted with it)-
  
  More on Conciousness
  
• Sex work legelisation and decriminalization, with labour protections from the industry.
  yeah I said it, no moral objection here. Based on this book
• Electoralism minimialist, rather expressing the right to protest whenever needed.
  
• Status Functionalism : We, in a society from the profession and de-professionalise are designed for status role play and seriousness. Everything from the input and out of our wishful intentions and from our workful labour expressed is a manner of interconnectivity that creates our own interactions.
  
  These are ingrained in our structures. From informal groups into a start of our formations.
  
• Gradualist Conciousness To form coherence or incoherences, we recogize little dots and connect them to form concepts bottom-up expression. These Gradulist impressions are a constraints against enthropy and communicate to one another. (That link was towards a curious definition towards memeory)
  
  Does not mean that independent states of phoenoma occur top down, then with that. Yet phenomena should be treated as construct holistically.
• Semiotic constructvist rather than a semanticist, not a Saphir Whorf Hypothesis I'd prefer to think visually rather than verbally, although I find great value within literature and the art of verbal expression. Words do not change how we ontologically behave, symbol first and the meaning that connects second.
  
  That being said, the cartoonist/scriptwriter can do well to know about narratology, patterns of narrative that can lead towards a structural understanding filling the semiotics with. There's only so much praxis that can be accomplished.
  
  It's how a mental telenomy of the gestal left behind.
• Experience machine would be a bad time, Brain stimulation reward is a race to the bottom. (Here's the thought experiment)
• I understand the tension of deontology/dialectical materialism, so I may add the capability approach to making Marx compatible, John Rawls had an approach too, ain't touching that. Can't read all literature.
• (Experiment here)P-Zombies aren't real due to the Gradualism of our conciousness of the mind. So it becomes a naturalised
• Moral Realist, Experimental ethics yet with model science, it can't answer everything, non realism can be entertained, though. Still up.
• Structuration of aesthetic value: While subjective outsider art exists. Welfare is meant to help the middle class with the enhancement of the productive forces. All part of pluralism.
• Gettier justifications being fully complete: That's where true justified complete belief comes in.
• All Qualia phenomnologist: a fascinating area of study. I haven't specialised in the theory of mind that much yet, but with that, our experiences 
• Eliminative Idealism/Materialism does not exist is cruel, life is more diverse than that. Copyrighting itself is the bean-counting proffesion of direct response that requires that.
  
• Idea/expression is important If somebody tastes my idea, I've still got my idea. Good thing there imaterial otherwise they'd flumph into being!
• Populism sucks bandwagons and being well liked for it's well likeness is a unpersuasive tautolgy. In a manner of way. The academic/services enterprise has it's value in society. So yeah that's a link to be tech manifesto.

Stuff I don't have the foggiest, difficult

• Mathematical realism and non realism : Sure, evidentialism could suggest a discovery of counting, yet such a thing is up in the air.
• Time Theory. B and A theory. Seems fun! Still a hole in my foundherentist framework.

Boom, that's a life. Independent.

Thanks for reading.

This is post is CC BY-ND