Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
I must consider the antonym that fits best, Obscurity for Clarity feels more fitting, along with now, It's time for authentic opposite and more symmetrical reasoning, if that means anything, triad or quadruple reasoning will have to rest.
What's artifice? Is it necessarily bad?
No, It's got no free will, it's only through its functionalism that we can ordain its purpose, it's not fair to treat it like an autonomous thing. I can't blame it for anything, Its responsibility is that like of electricity and energy.
It's all a tension and release. With no consciousness, the designs of the de- of the orginal users here.
Users of work schedules can be good or bad, if not personalised, it can be bad, each accordingly with the mileage that can vary.
So boop boop, or, it's something I thought with this video.
40 min, I'll have to comment on this again.
( Especially on the intrusive thoughts, as for unsolicited advice. Some good, some disagreements with the dystopian/utopian fiction, here'n there. )
Welp, yeah, I'm doing a philosophy student again, I always go back to thinking about thinking, aren't I? I could to it all day. Meta for Clarity… Oh dear, obscurity. No wonder advertising has influence on other sites.
What all this consciousness and neural networks with Ai is showing the oddity and credibility of the chinese room experiment, so I'll go further.
Overlooking the fact there are so many, from the ad creep, the ad creeping horizon of expectations. With the crawling sigma grind set and the crunch culture. That happens to be the case of the odds one out with courses.
Swimmers body all over again, instant results, before and afters, edits, get the she-bang in the flash, transform in the snap of the fingers.
Yep, too good to be true Survivorship bias, like fallacies, are informal fallacies which can't be quantified and need credibility to back it up. I'm going through my own experience with this.
Should include western ballet thing, yet that's my campism and politics talking. Still reassessing my own positioning on that matter, and will have to come back to you with another editorial.
Since i had to check out thought slime some more, here's my fave. Second to the hard work and Garry Vee.
Myself resonating with the anarchist critique of hard work and art commodification, being defined by price. Brings back to the image of imperfection that's back to wabi-sabi. Bad art, slop, it comes for all our lives, since it ain't an exact qualifier, it can't be made.
By good enough, that means the objective infinite money, apparently.
I'm being overly meticulous for a point, to the point of calorie tracker.
Bearnards boop animation
Current day on Thursday, last day of July. Unreliable work tracker got from this post, with thoughts.
Two fat Monstys -8hrs from idea board 5hrs?
Scar's portrait
-8 hr 31 on pinups of Jon On Plaza.
Double spread's within adult works Frog F'd minus the 33 h
Cover
End cover pinup. These are moments I have done after my workout schedule 5/2 week. Apparently. Even if I cut back on volume.
The lord's ram splash pages.
My blog pages (some of them lost as I deleted the doodles as I was done) Total collective time.
Look it that, my vertical blog doodles are even more inconsistent.
Another with my pinups. Last time it was five hours, it was typing up in m blog.
Sometimes I type in my phone, I read while walking, does that count? Reading for pleasure, reading for essays to learn a thing or two,
ugh, felt most tired with this one
This was all the industrial tradition of scientific management by Taylor. Yet I cannot determine or take it seriously, there's only a long succession of mise-en-place and the little.
Then the physical coaches like Eric helms with auto-regulation, fatigue management and deloading with workload sensitivity. That's not even touching on the work, and it's ontological characteristics that It could be questioned. Anti-work and the Burnout society with the virtue of uselessness.
Yet ho ho, all these work hours. They're all so arbitrary.
It's going to take a lot of unionizing and atomisation that will take on the industrial burnout machine, that's already displaced us.
Oh, and remember Ashton Hall's morning routine, there's this thing that it was pure advertising, and it's race to the bottom because it's become a commodity now.
Bragging on social media labour power has become advertisement now, and the cobra effect of that has seeped into it. They
I'll put a gag routine here.
Even with the work hour laws and such. They are not reflected with the advertisement for these kinds of motivational TikToks. Unethical advertisements driven by response rates and audience capture.
This applied latterly with my programming of artwork has been better, so I'll share it.
Oh certainty, does not exist within this editors-free digital age.
Those who love it as with there are degrees and then there's probability,
From the Georges Moore the open question (Which has been critiqued from various schools of thoughts) Yet I do believe in the process of Quine's irrational sciences Such as publishers try to find a magic wand to manifest hits or that somehow that it's suppose to manifest an instant influencer deal by hitting the stocks of the internet, through such a mysticism a phantasm of romantic manifestions are these done. Not wholistically though, not systemically, that's thats a danger.
Cannot manifest a chance in that lottery.
Carneades was going with a foundherntist view of epistemology. Crossewordism along with a web, with contradictions assimilating then assorting. Science does the specification, yet art does not follow that. Creativity does not follow that.
All in the design of our own determinations and creative springs.
It's time to revive argument debate garbage-bag ideology
Did I hit my head to ancaps?
That absurd place Seth roasted them now. Economists have dismissed, and still, still they persist, persist like troglodytes under the pretensions to be well-read. They called it a pipe-dream, yet it's still more a bone-dry slave.
Boosting this, Rynd was not a libertarian. It was an odd set of traditions that led into a new set of circumstances. Even anarchists have a historical background and justification, along with Pluralist and other ologies.
As they say, Ayn Ryad not apart from it.
Oh, I'll have to plug in thought slime, I'm going to have to see my own door into his mind, who embarrassed himself.
There are notes, notes of why that she observed and amazed by Scientific management and then making all here fictional hero's like robots of efficiency. Then that was with all the selfish 'objectivism' and self-interest making contradictions and pretensions to the temple of self-service, or the justification of that. More reactionary with that silly idea, and somehow the west gave here a platform, something unique with the conditions of that pro-slaveness, that happened.
Now any sensible argument or construction of subject/object is tainted because of that.
As an edutainer, I must leave with this song of their mantra.
(I'll never sketch myself as the nostalgia critic again, and it's not even a coherent expression because it's old stuff, yet.)
Time to describe a bad decision. Following from Seth's Claude Dog Post , I've deliberately postponed this review.
Short version: I've tried my best to not make this an entertainment spectacle by making it into a format video with bells and whistles. Course I took is off-the-mark, and I don't recommend, I then think more about Licence quoting a Cryptography guy and calling it. Due to the illiteracy of licensing, I had to rewrite my TOS.
Longer version
I bought a course by Seth. I'm not convinced with my wabi-sabi tendencies. I buy it so you don't have to! I'm going through my disagreements and snorting book reviews. Maybe out of parasocial relationship, I've decided to buy his silly course on AI.
Welp, Here are 35 pounds discounted. I could not resist. Most interesting was building a career without AI. Comparing it with the weather and the species like Kevin Kelly. Yet here we go with a another movement I cannot predict.
Then I was recommended of Midjourney and Claude from Seth, and to put it on Youtube, youch. I haven't been into perplexity as it was.
With the ideas here, I'm certain that he's going somewhere here with a workable plan. He had going with something with productivity and value and why others must go and be impresario. A leader and not a follower (ain't that what entrepreneurs do?) Yet, urgh. It's still 85 quid now of this writing.
Axiological arguments of value creation do not apply to a Taylorist Industrialist, by the way, I think he notes that himself, yet that means that with are own urbanism that we are inter-meshed now it's a subject to be explored. That he did within his song of sigificance,
He then goes into tasks and projects, within how that such a thing will be driven my freelancer cobbler automation and that clients concerned about productivity by the industrialist would as Henry Ford, those are thoughts are another time.
He claims lawyers certain professions aren't gone out of in five years real estate broker, truck driver, a pharmacist, a daycare worker is inconceivably not going to be replaced.
So now I cover with better uses of what techno-domnion and techno-affliation with such a mindless thing, he draws on deterministic free will and Daniel Dennet's Intentional stance. Oh, He also makes a claim that people don't go to Hackneyed Movies from Hollywood any more, I get not courting their opinion. Yet, Disney get's traction.
What can happen with this though is Seth's attraction with determinism as a position compared to Dennet's Compatiblism in regard to interpreting free will when it comes to comparing this tech with autonomy.
I ended up writing the review. (It's going to be licence ramblings from now on. Already done it.
"As a wabisabi illustrator, Independent. The implications of using AI have reached wildfire within anti-ai, I hope copyright cases get turned down because being into creative commons licensing, attempting to out-license it ain't going to work. It's nice to see somebody try to cool the flames down.
It's inevitable that in our times, though, I guess illustrators are either going to embrace or walk the opposite direction. Impresarios such as us.
I mean, What will happen with disconnection of this day and age. I do hope that there going to be more essays that don't muddy the waters.
Brings me back to Niel Postman's Technopoly, that's such a thing. What the implications with our own designs such as it will pursue the conflicts here. You're thoughts on Henry Ford are poignant.
Thanks."
Got my Certificate, eh, yeah. There's that credentialism that's apparently I have to show now. Ugh, Udemy.
Am I supposed to be proud?
Further notes.
Technopoly out of all the technological books, this felt the most relevant to what's happening today. Even with the last two. This was, despite the disagreement western bias of Cold War terms, eeriey similar to Alex Avile reported on within the second video.
Well, thanks, I guess. I don't think AI-philes will get much, AIphobes will get average with the end with Seth's plan for those who plan to not build their business with it average, cannot fully recommend. He does summarise his ideas in his next post, hmm.
Considering Steve Klabnick has a similar to mine, with being wary'n technological puritan. Not a Tech opportunist. I'm simply not the industrial bottom line, not Disney, not Nintendo, not King who managed to lay off its employees.
Oh, It's still generative Ai, well that could be a marketing term right now. Now for the last notes.
. Jumping in bed with For-profit companies for content ID is not going to work, a nightmare system as it is. I'd wish they call it copyright infringement, but everything is loaded with RFAA terminology. It is even argued that it ain't the case, the push to make fair use and fair dealings obsolete to apparently control the diffusion models and LLMs. Trying to marketize style will only consolidate power.
Again, licensing tends to encourage monetize/marketerize-or-die kind of logic, which I'm trying to avoid.
. Environment is a loaded gun, none of the essayists or pundits than Alex Avile, fight me on that one. I'd have to limit my micro-blogging after this. Bluesky and Xshwitter aren't going to be deliberately misinformed licensing.
. Education and connections with controlling tech have been noted with Peter Thiel. Along with certain reaction streamers championing it (not all). They should not be taken seriously anyway, anybody who takes thou opportunist ambulance chasers are confirming Neil postman has said about Amusing ourselves to death.
12 minute video, apart from the thing, this is going to move towards a hyperreality. How it is malicious theory to control with aimless categorization and normalisation as the maths cannot be determined by those who preprogram it. I mean Alex Avile has already touched on educational programs who happen to use with the Khan Academy.
This is a question for future generations, and the ones that will come afterwords.
Merely shows how what's at stake here.
Maybe I'm drawing a close parallel to the postmodern villain that Video's Team wrote. Copyright will end with Disney wanting to license our thoughts.
Lets hope for copyright-gate by the sovereign citizen types
"Unpopular opinion: the pro-copyright anti-information freedom response to generative AI is reactionary, and it’s bad in all the usual ways reactionary things are bad. The tech is here to stay. The only thing being decided as a matter of IP law is whether open models will be a thing, or if the big rights holders will get to make a lot of money by licensing proprietary models. As before, I prefer a world where information and tech are free and accessible. Like, I understand "I don't want to be put out of a job" but I really don't get "I want the tool that puts me out of a job to cost $159.99/mo from Adobe who licenses it from Getty, so I can rest easy knowing it was not trained on anything I made". IP law can deliver the latter, not the former. Right on cue. Perfectly legal licensed training data. For OpenAI, Midjourney, and Google. Not for open source models folks can hack on and run locally. (If the copyright maximalist doctrine prevails.) All the downside, none of the upside. Yay for copyright!" He points to this link https://www.404media.co/tumblr-and-wordpress-to-sell-users-data-to-train-ai-tools/
So I pour it, the course and the discourse. I'll leave looking at the AI entertainment channels next time.
Bading! As the table gets bells and whistles up the wazoo! Couch Gregor squeals in delight of his improved drawing tablet! "I could use some oc-drawings right now" says the art fighter. He gasps happily. "Wow! OC DRAWINGS FOR EVERYONE ! HAW HAW HAW" People of swarmed in OC drawings, physically they drown, digitally the entire servers at art fight erupt in flames then explode. Then, silence, then, sadness, Couch Gregor looks outside in shame as a LVL 90992093090290232 scribblers, then fade into black."
LEVEL UP! GET TO THE NEXT LEVEL get a million squillion with a level higher than the last importance!
Miles of crouton, this is for Physical overload, what about ideological overload? Or Cognative overload? Metabolic adaption? nah.
The metaphor of power scaling and progressive overload on distribution here is meant to induce direct response, iteratively and recursively forever and forever, of free freelance work on platforms prospecting to commodify attention for the interruption advertising. Ludology, well this is scarcity, choices and a system of affiliation and domination.
Basically, I described Social Media perpetual engagement model with how they serve interruption advertisers, as with subscriptions.
Atrophy from hackneyed recursions, stimulation of the novel, All the cognitive speeds and physical movement of my processes are an exploration, not the end result of a perfectionism of performance that the entertainment.
Oh, how wish it. Only a means of metamorphism and the ship of theses do I change. It's a licensing strategy, a copywriting means. Or we machine? Are we meant to do a performance report for assembly lines?
Oh status, levelling up, levelling down. It's all there to interrupt via the advertiser platform, zoom!
That's a pattern of thought to tingle with!! 🛋✨✨✨
This is why I'm https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ including my blog, including my ideas. Disney and Nintendo are too litigious. With there flexible permissions and the remixes of fan art of prospered.
I'm reminded that our licensing laws, as there fullest are full of controversy and disagreements, here's one I agree with Jimmy. Copyright, an obsolete concept, or something that may be undone by capital.
Oh my, the entire copywriting profession, being completely hackneyed, each is a vote for copyright, or a vote for the legitimising of such a system.
One of the reasons why I self-publish.
I'll continue. What I've learned from licensing that people, like libertarians, have a market fundamentalism view of that only artistic energy can be placed within the desire of making money, oh how easily measures yet naive. Also, that's not art. Not even the conversion rate an executive makes, well, that of the work's exchange value is reductive in of itself.
Work schedules, crunch culture, sigma grind set, Criminalisation/decriminalisation of sex work/anti-work, sexcess, design theories and praxis, those are all the things a craftsman can discuss that don't need licence. Pro-bono and other charity projects are always there that can be done without permission.
Including the ontology of licence. Along with the witherist position. The licensing industry complex, yeash. Sustainability being a trained skill again.
( Oh btw, since capital is going to disintegrate licences due to jingling keys with it's David Foster wallace Infinite Jest that can be played on doomscroll is qualitatively different from establishing a community that prioritize mutualism and equitable, resource redistribution of the co-operatives will always be more beneficial. No from the reactionary populism this big companies have. )
Here's a 15 video by Shiddy kickflips with cussing, I need to document it here in case you missed it.
Next time! Couch Gregor will look within Comfy UI, the stuff coco was made from. 🛋🔎
Aokaimaidu got me these sources, thought I'd add my comments.
Kuroshi and licensors. Along with production committees, there's going to have to be a line somewhere where creative labour forces will have to stop jumping through hoops and licensing loopholes with that industry complex.
Death by overworking with comic 'professional' that being a euphemism here since there are overworked comicer that have this Stockholm syndrome with the profit motive. Like being rented mules with others like other rented mules, like the previous.
Or is the standard where love cannot persevere amongst hateful working conditions? Best to be separate from all that ruckus.
Sony has consolidated the licensing, to have to keep in mind.
Licensing politics, even entertainment can't especape form sone/disney/nintendo when it comes to that.
Prescribing a doorway instead of describing it and the horizon of expectations, well, with the generativity and creativity that entails.
Unless if somebody does not want to publish the idea for a single audience member, locking it in a vault never to be seen again, (that's another can of worms). It's going to have multiple interpretations of its ontology, only with the semi-autobiographical ways of looking at this, the many editorials shall we will discover the output.
So yeah, even with the prescriptions, it can be for the wrong reasons, from the worst reasons to the best.
15 minutes, nobody of the coming race could have predicted the pluralist descriptions that were to happen before.
Wow, have to share this.
Oh how entertainers and stuck within our societal context
Shakespeare wrote the love was blind, that includes carnality.
Sadomachositic sexccessful fiction, did not know to feel pleasure or pain of these takedowns of the industry of sex we are facing. Portnoy being the oldest, snuff the latest. All from flawed villains except from the messy climax of Snuff.
Portnoy's Complaint
Now this is an embarrassing tale of bumbling excess or a confessional cautionary tale of sex flumps, ending with a psychological nightmare of being tried for such lecherous activity.
It ends with one of the most humiliating confession and woopsey self-pleasure accidents that's a brought to the typographic imagination.
Snuff
World *W***** Three*
What a situation of hang ups with a porn actress as the villian within this mini-plot of the actors having to deal with synopsis of each mini show of the industry, the place like becoming a pearl out of a cockle of an industrial stone heart.
This could be a critique of sexcess or the opportunistic contra dictionary glass house with entertainment, of course it's money the goal.
Great clownery, of all our ideas it's a clown show that ends in a painful amount of hyper-consumerism.
Here's a NSFW video on chucks view, and his response to the libertarian villain behind it.
28 minutes. What a twisted W****achry, love-hate, this must be a romance
As with all things with love'n sex, it can get complicated.
Y'know with the racist and sexist rants tied with a lust for money, with a voice of guttural sex and one of money, it's so recursive of this villain's desire for money it becomes like a broken record, money, money and money.
Everything is corrupted by profit accumulation here, as we do so under our own hypocritical licensing laws. Including the sluggish beast of the protagonists selves in sex and money. It all becomes a character study as an oil baron with the petrodollar, various sex workers and industries including with other confessions of a bigot of somebody who won't be on my Christmas card list.
Does nor exist, economists log off. There is the knowledge domain. What they ain't is a scarcity of knowledge. Such a scarcity with what is able to be searched today.
Such a dubious concept, along with the attempt of an intellectual monopoly and monopsony. As if thought can be controlled. Such a matter with idea's concepts and style that are too broad to be categorized with a thing.
This brings a division, on how these matters where tutors tell other artists to use reference, yet not when it comes to copyright, our that such a matter concerned with its own withering and the means to monetize.
These are the alternative laws with regard to displacement with others, with defendants can in regard to maximalism of licensing laws.
From Alix Aviles* second video.
Oh dear, looks like it's going to be a combination of AI and Copyright, yet with such licensing laws there's going to have to be a reimagining with them. Or circumnavigating them, as it merely will make fan iterations impossible.
Copying non-commercially was forever a practice within classical academics, I've done sight size method myself as a manner of teaching Copying were to mean to bring design patterns and their aesthetic axiologies into a new repeatably and consistency. Copying will help transform and merge
A scientist goes does deep down of the ideology of libertarian, western thought - pro capitalist thought left behind via Ayn Rand. Well, I could draw a line down there, Adam does not know how that from Steven Jay Gould and to the moment of our technocracy of yearning for a sense of control, a matter that transcends copyright and the licensing laws of the ownership to our attention and the control of it with our attentional facilities
That reminds me when it's comes to AI within the idea of making our own ideas with controlling the conversation, aiming for the outsider.
1:34 hours (Yeah there was criticism where the sponsor previously, yet welcome to the machine of entertainment that we live in. ) *Anywhere, here's the vid
That's curious, that was a different definition of accelerationist, (Maybe he's using a different definition which I don't hold. The direct action plan sounds well, though. Also with something off-base with certain sources such as Mark Fischers miserablism.
It's all.. Mild and inoffensive, though, all things considered. Even with the direct action strategy.
Yet the legal battle, I can't really join in that circus.
(This one is on my to-read list, so many on the bucket list.)
Tom scott also did a video in regard to other work
Patricia also did a video in regard to understanding the licensing laws. It's not going to be easy.
Well, imagining other means such as a right to the city and other means of direct action is a anarchist methodology of accomplishing that's also suitable. Also, the handshake deal that is taken for granted. Such as a simplicity on that with a written agreement.
The copyright industry complex. Urgh. Why are so many willing to die on that hill?
Has our licensing laws every been pro-worker? Look at those perverse incentives.
As with the naturalistic reductionists with what happened with religion, so will there be a trend with our own licensing laws. What I also dislike about this reductionism that it reduces all aesthetic energy to how much will commodify it, the get-rich-and-famous contract. Something wiggling inside me is telling my that's not art.
So, to confirm.
LLM and Diffusion models are remixing tech that's mindless and iterative to our designs. Only through the deal that ain't contingent of NDA's and several escrow payments and paperwork, we could do work or anti-work that makes a difference.
Thoughts...
My editorial:
I tend to prioritize fraudulent behaviour than ontological perfection of IP/Copyright. John Lockian property rights are a liberal conception that can lead into petty sport of the printing press. (Even John Locke opposed monopoly, btw)
I don't like either the diffusion model training data and copyright. It's catnip to industrialists because they are about faster and cheaper product.
I'm currently doing more journalism within the legalese stuff, this gets quite
editorial and even into political and economical matters. Never underestimate the simple, direct transaction over complex.
Since property rights are easier to argue from an industrialist due to capital, it's only a matter of not playing their game. Only a different game and system that the independent not dependent of the commercial industry.
( Oh and if they decide to content ID this article on Goofy being incredibly hot, they erm I guess I told you so. Guess entertainment ain't an amorphous blob. ) Guess I'll have to preserve it here for great justice.
I guess this is a matter of taking a deep breath. Along with focusing on the main struggle. I guess that's enough of this hornets nest of da industry.
Previously on Couch Gregor's ai editorals. Since I'm dissatisfied with all the editorials, I made my own.
Looking at the coco workflow, there's the usage of noding and shaders here like it's used within blender, with 3d models.
Huh, according to the questionable lawsuits there n has been ethical questions in regard to this, I've had to check what this will do for independents.
Looks like it will have to relax and into noding, with minimal text-to-prompt speech, I'm afraid such a matter will move towards no copyright infringement. The environmental concerns along with the labour is another matter.
I can still see some inconsistency here and there, i think it will.
The only answer to this will be to do another art piece.
Since copyright licensing laws aren't going to stop this ( Disney has been developing its out diffusion models for to replace to concept artists.. ) Such a matter that copyright infringement it out of existence, it's going move into ethical questions with regard to its use and not contingent on commercial publishing and industry.
Licensing politics! Yeesh. Have they slapped me with a copyright infringement from drawing an Aggron as a pin-up, perish the thought. I'm merely a content producer to them anyhow.
This book is on my audiobook list in terms of essays. So many coming out these days. Got the audiobook.
( Oh hint, my untested estimate is that I agree with 80% percent of the book, it's good at dealing with the transhumanist thought that's been erupting more within Silicon Valley and the saviour complex.)
With the rise of deepfakes will continue to occur, along with the
The age of scepticism is going to get more muddy. Herschel Gordon Lewis had a point with direct response rates
Disinformation campaign first, funding latter.
Going to have to boost this as such tech evolves, Fox Key did make a post that this will continue since films are the most labour-intensive and expensive forms that we take for granted. Including videogames, and such a licensing that will only move it underground, along with managing.
I'm not sure if we can out-license of with this will combine to some odd concoctions, I don't like this I.P loving people, (Even though I can imagine a system of resource redistribution not contingent on it, merely like how qualitative differences between a restaurant and a soup kitchen works. Does that make me a anarchist? Oh, well. )
It's not that the lowest common denominator word of content means the worst and the best. Bill Gates definition versus Martha McLuhan definition.
Welp, I'll have to keep track as these things unfold, and soul-searching will occur. This broad brush will see more erm, cases, so to speak. Both Industrialists and the silicon will be watched.
(Also it's copyright infringement, not theft, RFAA implanted that. )
Copyrighting copyrighting, Self referential metamodernism into what appears to be the opposition of meaning and then towards at hyperreality where nothing can be sincerely enjoyed any more, and then it's too pure again, back and forth, back and forth.
So that's the trap, it's never-ending. It's a concept, it's not measured.
Thinking about this video
Had some disagreements with the golden mean and Peter skinner, at least what Peter Skinner was not as contentious as other works. Yet I did not know how self-referential has been used by artists when nothing else can be referenced, unless it get slapped.
So as with our texture to weave patterns that are meaning is made. With recursive recursion the perfection of advertising of attention retention provided by the advertisers being the perfection, yet circular reasoning it is that's unpersuasive.
Please, do protect the commons for providing free entertainment for the masses, YouTube poop, becomes YouTube gold. Bored teenagers making amusement and then back again.
Such a cycle of charity of entertainment was a gift to us, and we have to make it with our own ghosts of what were discarded commodified shells, making life again. They still exist, projects made for the self-entertainment of a bunch of random kids where the ideation of good enough if the incongruity of a certain happenstance was to happen out of the expectations of the conflict portrayed. So too, shall they hit the good zone of what it means to pursue a hobby within what it looks like a juicy remix.
A juicy remix from the commons and the into the creative well-being of our own desires. Out of such silly free-market hockey, there are things that stick along within our times that I made from abadoned commercial dreams.
So that, such deliberate ignoring, do these blossom.
