18 video of sloppification, or of paint by numbers and getting water condensation on the wings and falling in the ocean when. A young-un has a chestnut.
Even though that the be the best version of yourself as the Anatta non-self. Especially works being an honest hack and non-artist.
Commercial network television of ad-run videos run, It's going to be a tighter grip on us all. Yeah, some opinions suck, don't they?
Those feedback loops of commercial editing that's how to 'hack' the net to spread the net of virality consultancy, merely don't work, they can't work.
---
I'd have to disagree with his games being the highest form of art, since it's fan-base hasn't matured to make civil, literary conversations regarding negative analysis to reach a higher understanding. Oh, and the toxic fanbase, yeah the toxic fanbase, certainly. Alliterate, Apolitical place with a lack of self-respect and interest.
One prosumer slop bucket. Only for the ones out of it Disco Elysium.
We poetry in from the start of western civilisation of writing, when everything is articulated as poetry from our thoughts.
When it comes to entertainment, there's a moment when a poem and a satire becomes a biting commentary within the genre that's talked forever to come, with one of the ones that stand out and critique the genre. Along with doing the edge work with the creative soul lashing out.
There are plenty of war games that are indie that hit hard, yet not like this one. One where the entertainment is subverted into a what is the master of art and the mastery of the human soul. On a most spiritual transcendence shall it be triumphant.
The favourite part of the game is the quotes other than the out-of-moment realistic condemnation, including the deserter ending.
How will the spectacle be the thing, though. Commercial Spectacle-driven vs Literary Character driven, does it exist or not with these productions. Did it the art still exist.
The character contradictions are shown with the accusions below. This is negativity used to help use
There is no difference between what is right and what is necessary.
If you were a better person, you wouldn't be here.
It's time for you to wake up.
Squad commands are unavailable when you're alone. No one can help you now.
You are still a good person.
Can you even remember why you came here?
This is all your fault.
Do you feel like a hero yet?
To kill for yourself is murder. To kill for your government is heroic. To kill for entertainment is harmless.
White phosphorous is a common allotrope used in your slaughter at the Gate. It can set fire to soldiers and the innocent civilians they are trying to help.
It's Konrad. He did it. All of it.
Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding two conflicting ideas simultaneously.
You cannot understand, nor do you want to.
The US military does not condone the killing of unarmed combatants. But this isn't real, so why should you care?
We cannot escape anguish. It is what we are.
If Lugo were still alive, he would likely suffer from PTSD. So, really, he's the lucky one.
Adams blames Walker for Lugo's death. It's his fault they didn't leave Dubai when they had the chance.
Walker's obsession with Konrad has brought nothing but destruction—to Dubai and his squad.
There is no escape.
Life begins at the other side of despair.
No one can help you now.
Collateral damage can be justified, if the gain outweighs the cost. How much do you think Adams and Lugo are worth?
Freedom is what you do with what's been done to you.
I exist and I find it nauseating.
Walker and Adams have served together for many years.
You can't go home.
If the Radioman now speaks for the 33rd, then what happened to Konrad?
No it does not change how you think, so writing is this meaning I'm not with it?
5:24
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, it's not how it works though.
What am I doing? Endless content ticking for the content gods to animate a space for it to sell to another. I'm never planning to monetize this space, so now. This is mere generiosity to build trust for other, more expensive expressions of that idea that are going later on the line.
Or not, I may nether get the monetization on this luck-based system. I'm never following the standards of productivity according to the west, with my attempts to be a slow-maker it's never that possible.
Yet, here are the efforts to see what I've learned. The Literacy/Commercial distinction now refined into the Brand/Direct-response;conversion of my produce, once dubbed and now made into fresh art slivers. Let this be the flailing towards.
Clarity, Benefit, and verisimilitude. Those are on direct transaction and delivering an audience to point a to point b, anything else though ain't the point.
Or, through the Grice's Maxims too, This binge of language videos, ah.
It's left to the clacking of the mechanical keyboard and a tick tick of a physical little thing of whatever metric there is. Even to none-at-all of no performance review.
I don't respect a country that dominates both the internet and teaches this hackneyed mass-entertainment to a mainstream audience. Burnout schedules and all that bananas. It's not worthy of any respect or prescription. From the Gary Vee's or Rachel Hollis's. Deep into the Multi-level marketing corruption that's happening.
Such a rotten country, from the hackneyed entertainment it stinks.
Sex Sells, so it will keep carrying on, yet I'll keep bringing it up, even without payment. Why? Because it makes others angry.
Guess who won in the electoralist in the west? Oh my It's that.
Even apoltics are politics because of the hackneyed subservience to the status quo. I'd rather be a political in my entertainment than a commodified tool. There are those who hand away their artistry for a quick pay cheque, all for a logical positivist number-go-up life with that's all too it. Replacing a point-of-view and assertion with a scheme, and a reverse-engineer.
Don't want these to be prosumer toys.
Keep on fighting, LGBTQIA+, I'll keep making gay art.
10 min essay on entertainment discussion.
Addendum: I'm not writing about the Honest hacks in entertainment with that blog post, I'm talking about a nation of swindlers and those clerks who follow them. Anyhow, I'll try my best for art within this post-entertainment era. Full of chocolate casein powder 🛋💭🍫
They are swindles within entertainment: that's the point.
Have to have with savvy writes books. Mlms have contributed to the blur within our ways with ad-creep.
Ad-creep is a serious danger of everything to be commercialised for subtraction of everything to be into a money-making scheme. Family ain't meant to make money, friends who are there for you do not equivocate into selling them out.
That's personal and private, the social where is the blur that happens the most.
Be careful who you work for. Including the ones one advertising money. He keeps pulling me back, also the freelanceing, and advertising.
This is one of the best posts, except for the worst post in regard to lizard brains, and atomized systems.
Who to work for? Now that the omni-promiseification of showing a part of self online with the market with these direct-marketing tickers. It's best to know who to work for, be it for self-expression, for the generosity of others. Or the ad-creep of ad-supported platforms.
Showing up with attendance could change what somebody is becoming, from the ontological fabric of one's own being.
Don't follow the advice of the internet that treat's other work as useless. It's why I haven't bothered to get affiliate on twitch, because if I'd merely do react streams and the au courant of twitch's SEO, then I'd have to do it again and again. Raising that number for Ad creep.
Not selling myself to that.
Since I'm going to read his strategy book, His new self-help (oh boy) I'll see if it has any use, yet it will never replace my instinct.
Alex St John is a whip-cracking sweat shopper, boycott, gate keep, keep out. 13 min
I doubt Gary Vee, Rachel Hollis, and any of these hustle grifter hacks will be out of business anytime soon, sadly, since there will be a demand for inspiration inside a box.
There is only so much to learn from the CEO/CMO mindset in regard to how to predict how these commercial publishers behave, including the entertainment umbrella genre. I'm only a freelancer, though; I single operator.
Such a mindset can only be so useful, to the point of exploring the uselessness of it, that we can understand that these commercial institutional are not on our side. Guilty first, and innocent second. Using social media to train others to deliver an audience or response rate them.
The only thing about it is to not waste such cognitive energy to get validated by these constructs, into their very own DNA, to ontologically follow the direct-response waves.
There's always a reason why, and it's an incentive. The Milton Friedman Doctrine. All this toxic productivity, leading into the mindset of the economist. To the temple of commercial publishing.
8 min indirect response to all of this, the criticism to an Anita may be outdated, it's the general response of why this CEO/Commerical mindset will exist. Dysfunctional is still the word here when they use celebrity voices and commercials, with mass audiences being their master.
The dysfunctional bag-getting for getting the beg.
Well, things of stake could be only be so relevant with those golden parachutes. I've added with all these things with social media being used to train for marketing for others.
49 min Munecat's essay to top it off.
It's worth to see the businessparter/consumer mindset of the advertising middlemen of ad-creep, and then focus on other things, of other things to work on.
Theo, Diagnosis of his contradictions with his story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZFQG2e87ZU
57 min essay
Since when pathologizing has reached a myth, poetic symbolism used to sell a story of defeating an arch type of evil. It's all myth though, it's dream-like of wanting to believe of the stuff behind the ideas. If once a theory of the mind, the soul, made into the intellectual call to actions.
Yep, another dance of scientism. A complex, of unity of opposites of the fight of good and evil, and the contradictions of symbolic conflict, of old time. Solipsism, egotism, self-interest against the empaths, wage the wars!
All of an outdated physiological diagnosis. All attention to the attention god of direct marketing glamour mediums! All hail, beyond the complications of reality, people do still believe.
It reminds me that we are the minority of how these explode despite the fundamentalism, despite the foundherentism that I follow.
What contradicts self-obsession? Well, Self hate and suicidal ideation. All these are thoughts that intersect with reasons to reveal a more human condition we see with our own identification with others. The simplest definitions are going to be stuck around with that community. Guess it's not for me.
26 minutes (with an audible ad I'd suggest you'd skip. Go for Libby.)
The grind, ah, the grind. Even to the point of the limit of self-improvement, the bravery has to. The work-more-hours cult is always rearing its ugly head, and it's got into new-age stuff regarding its belief system going into mysticism not contingent on an entity.
Hustle-culture as everything defined by our work, and that this work-life balance that is made to 'make it' yet the meritocratic myth of the cool kids and the math does not add up, and the viable business model.
False lifestyles of physically impossible lifestyles. That's self-exploitation is now a thing. This has been going 30 years from now, and it's only a matter of time to avoid these narratives to pursue a more caring one with compassion.
Byung-Chul Han should proselytize of the virtue of uselessness. Then with our own times, with each construction of self that is to be commodified by ad-creep of seo ad-directed sectors of our net. It's an addiction to these business models meant to lead out into our system, which we all meant to live in.
Only with our these that are meant to bring predictable results, will be tilted in new directions, into a better system.
I'll have to add that book to my reading list, in regard to the burnout society.
It's time to inverse the cynicism into optimism, then back into ambivalence.
Cyncism is all merely and reaction, it's to think of times of least cynical to things to respond in balance, towards and back again. It's always nice to compare to times of sympathy with the contempt to see which states are happening.
Most Cynical :
When the race to the bottom included lying to lifestyles and sleeping schedules to the best of all that meant. All to heighten up the SEO and click-through rate.
10:30-19:30 On it, Corrupt freelancers and educational institutions teach physically impossible sleep schedules that will burn out creatives to help stop the competition outside the system which they operate in.
They really are underground, under-the-radar methods advice of burning the candle in both ends advice that's constantly remade and sold to a new generation, made to burn dreams before they ever appear. Indie teaching institutions do it all the time now, not that I'd name them.
To be treated like a rented mule, then made to believe that it's rented mule's fault is a special place in dystopia for them. Treating time like a shortcut, and not as a tool. I don't think others with my cognitive disability should listen to such stuff as inspiration porn.
What is now direct-response bait for the developers of high data, Influencers who are now called content makers, to the slop meta. Oh well, it's going to be cool-hunted by the flawed business models. 🎰 Commercialism shall be the matrix of the casino for days to come. (Which is why a appreciate subscription models now )
Least cynical 2: Seths blogs post on developing financial independence. Already covered it. Here's a marketer ( or, he calls himself a teacher ) that actually gave wise guidance. When how Eric Helms stated how short-term education was his goal as a trainer, and that those trainers who does not let the students out-grow them are like mushroom farmers (Like Geoffrey Verity Schofield) Feed C*** and keep them in the dark.
"1. Don't pay anyone for simple and proven instructions on how to achieve this goal. In particular, don't pay anyone to teach you how to write or sell manuals or ebooks about how to make money online."
Probably he's post on advanced Meta post, this categorized self-help guru that may have mad errors, including the lizard brain, recommending bad books. Still selling courses and others. A b-corp, Something like a Gabe Newel. Welp, I'm a freelancer, so I know what to expect.
Self-help Gurus, good or bad. Certainly teach the limits of the casuai sui. Of ultimate responsibility.
Well, Including AC-bu success being a unique internet thing with a means to formalist philosophy guiding its culture. There's as much as inspiration to respond to as much as expiration.
Sui generis of such a poet.
It's nice to contradict ones own cynicism.
Bonus video of 10 min on luck, the stuff that's not contingent of self matters within this industry and the hustle-culture business guru stuff. This advice does not sell one on the casus sui.
"Slop, Sludge, Brainrot, or Slop Content refers to , low quality content (eg. Games, videos, clips) that is clearly made to hop and market off of new trends, and usually involves the mish-mashing of trends together. If it's video content, it's usually brainless and seems to be almost AI generated because of how ) it can be. Games classified as slop content are usually marketed towards little kids with highly saturated colors, microtransactions, and notable characters from other popular games."
Aka Cool-hunting in a new form. It's a new tragedy in the making with selfie sticks around the campsite.
Since people are disposed by the money-making of influencer, they're switching it up with creator, or maker. For them.
Why even antagonise a system that's ontologically essential to business models? Until the abolishment of capital, that is.
Same with distancing oneself with brand and direct-response, trying to make it paradoxical when it shouldn't be. Attempting to grow new heads in the marketing machine that funds the production costs of prosumers wit, we are stuck fishing for attention that's integral. Stuck in the feed-back loop of post-commidifed end-result, baiting us once again.
Some have called this term the slop-mines. To gather impressions with the tailing pre-established popularity. Well, para-social relationships, you say between passive and active users.
Is that streamer using my attention as hollow leverage? Well, that's another thing to ponder about.
It helps satisfy to be a ruthless in behalf of one's own time/attention. That does not make these influencers evil, merely dedicated to their jobs within this postmodern connection economy.
There's a scene on On-gaka: Our Sound on the piece of performance, that it's still a gig-economy and that the strategy of being picked, Luck have nothing to be made as those when it comes to doing it as a hobby.
When keeping it in mind of the mental fulfilment, the selfishness could be a virtue of self-love with the means of hobby being the only piece of sanctity with all the amount of work.
That's what a gift is, when ideas are plentiful within this internet net. Especially with one with the booper. Gearing more about derisive intelligence, AI futurists/technocrats and It's detractors. Collecting opinions within the critics too. I'm not sure if my own.
Glad Tim Grawl managed to admonish this by separating the commodity makes and the artists.
Thankfully I'm happy the physic return of my hobby is good enough, I'm not sure if I'd want to do more commercial work right now.
I keep going back to one of the best meta-gags, That's with sunk-cost of the prices to be added towards it.
Even with the facetiousness of the mise en place, he still showed up and delivered on a promise, a promise that mega-commercial enterprises could not deliver. Of why, I am not a gamer, another reason into the mix.
Even with the non-delivery done without a price is more priceless than non-deliveries with a price.
Where the trust lands, the moment the direct deposit that is demanded, things change.
Trying the self-examine why I was a lurker for so long has made obsessed.
Of the many ways to pinpoint a fear of creativity from comfortable hackdom; Two words.
Scopophobia
This can and what makes a lurker a lurker, they're not a concern because there are a thousand things that a passive user may be doing to not publicise himself to the world, and that's okay. The moment he makes a thing a publishes towards the world, he holds a prospective responsibility to those which he can serve or not. To simply serve the idea of "I've made this."
Negaphobia
From the storyomnics book, yet it reflects into certain trends such as 'cozy' horror.
This is from advertising and slice of lives, with minimal conflict and advertising purposes, at this moment though when a conflict happens. The story telling could inflict conflict that could be construed as a 'plot' or an intention sequence of events and character response/reacts to that.
Some audiences want everything to be nice escapist fantasy, yet that could be only an over-promise, so we could go and understand that this problem. As with postiphobia and neaturaphobia!
(Neologised those two phobias there, if you have a phobiaphobia, I understand.)
( Or, Theory time, negaphobia has been developed from mesmerism and animal magnetism, from to self-help trend. )
What is with these contradictions, irregularities and stimuli that amalgamations? There's always going to be streams of advice that are going to state you can do better?
Better for whom, though? There's that moment when you hit publish without and editor and the traditional publisher would of delt with it. Not anymore, they are persuing random blips of platforms and streams of attention, to advertise their own publishing as they continue to consolidate.
The industry forgets what's right and wrong with advice, and it continues to chug along merely for the sake of that. Short term benefit rather than complete.
The industry needs to take it's own advice, yet it forgets, having its own amnesia.
17 min video , especially of the last moment where influencers and its figures.
Going through the marketiniese there are words and definition as people aim for more mind share, memetical they occur and uttered, and brought together.
Prosumer
Forgive me, I may have uttered that word within the bsky discourse.
Treating others as products is easy as a spammer through the incessant hustle and the necessity, Milton Friedmannian in serving the shareholders and investors with no social responsibility. Hustle vendors and hacks.
It's what the gambling industry is built on. Social media run on advertising is run by this consumerism design for herd organisation of status roles and what why want to be perceived as.
On the face, fulfilling and working with physical needs sounds simple, yet it's too simple and reductive, ignoring all the other things such as sociology and physiological factors of the mind.
ProCustomer
Despite the transactional nature, This is more a patient professional makes with building long-term connections and being more helpful, yet also respecting the physical laws.
There's still a pernicious aspect of capital yeah, amazon does customer worship though ainnit. As they way happens to moves, should there be customers in the first place?
Procommunity
Amatuars, Non-profits and freelancers rejoice! This is where the Zeitgeist, this where the communication of our times... Even if the monetisation does not come into, a sense of humanity is brought with the gift economy. Express to each other and to every need respected.
It's opinion essay time! Tw: Sexual assault, cussing and suicide mentioned within the video. I can understand the drama ahead, yet in the essay genre that's part of the course, I have warned you.
I must remember my brush with gaming culture, along with Tool times response to the feminist frequency series. Is the dust settled? I need to vent it out, within the blog.
How does fame work now, random waves of Demographics and Psychographics that woosh like ghosts through these calculations untold off.
This is where the entire definition of famous is to be inspected now. What was once defined by record companies and talent agents. It's another dimension, media access and distribution. Not it's decimated with a long tail getting longer, and filter bubbler getting more and more specific.
Famous? Infamous? Those distinctions are getting fuzzier with direct response driven into the end. This all turns into a game of status, creating attention pools and new demographics. For an ad creeping over to make it's commercial speech valid of the userbases, these are, data for conversion into money.
'Gamers' really don't know how much of themselves is a construct created by businesses to serve their money-making interests, and this interruption is seen in the prosumer demographic. Repeating in a circle.
After ten years, this has some insight. It reminds me of SSSniper wolf as a concept as everything wrong with YouTube right now, yet I don't know her as a person, it's with the audience as well. Always have those preconceptions, judged by the hand.
When the industry gatekeepers leave, it becomes a wild west.
(( They're still trying to capitalise off this with new videos denigrateing him into a lolcow status, don't engage, it's the first step of direct response. ))
Since commercial is connected with direct response of the market funnel, it feel intuitive, yet that's putting the cart before the horse.
Makes me consider how these incentive with a niche, yet the essayist or literary creator does not concern with capitalizing for pigeonholes and the mass, he creates with a clear motivating and intent. Oh, how it is simple that it's become yet another demographic to market too. The totalizing thing that these social media platforms is to log off.
23:15 On the dunking turning into an essay. Follow up to the Dan Olson's essay. Cussing.
All the part of becoming a conscious media consumer. These lol cows or content farms, put into another charitable. It is the simple following of a pattern of a formula that's leading into to a culmination of responses, for exposure, for the leading into a completely uncertain substance down a draw to lead into patronage.
What a dream, what a path, maybe this is a certain kinship that I can see with all this pattern making. Jesters entertain, jesters reflect, the jesters that are within all of us.
In ways of the argument, there ain't much a divide between the literary and entertainment. How the lol-cow, and the librarian shall look at each other. Let them separate, as the medium is till forever the message.
The work ethic that's hidden, that's taken for granted.
Such is the work that's made with a haul that's plain drudgery, maybe with moments that spark interest, yet the rest is taken into account with the budget.
It's meant to hold a set of principles that are made, then look ho, it knocks again. Wanting more. Then with the time that's made to all the whole house that made with the artifice of modern society making. With our start to understand of our physical cogs moving into consumption that are built into use a consciously recognized.
So this is mass-constructed to the end that's made with us, guess that's call progress. Mass can't track the all-time.
This video helps illustrate my point of self-defeating financial independence. On a meta of making money online as indefensible. 8:35 cussy
