Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Hobbyist media theorist. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
Beep boop, read my wires boy, read my robutt wires.
That's it! I'm reading a book because the copyright wingers using there existance on abolshing fair use are too much.
So I decided to try to get my moneys worth via reading research in this discovery of llms/diffusion models.
(Even if it's bad, I've read Ayn Rynd, is this comparable? Part of the writer's training! HOOOOOOOOOO!) Lets see how much this fascinates or tires me.
2023 Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick
I've changed my opinion
Starts with explanations of weights, and token prediction. Existential risk and ethics, lawsuits, Japan, ethics discussion. This if it's all a matter of understanding what the tech can do in terms of capabilities and incapabilities is going to really have to see through.
These four rules are his tenets that he elaborates on for a possible alternative with dealing with the tech, how people hide, how people use it, and what are the possible sci-fi futures that move along it. Here's his Ai Research blog.
I shall put him in the neutral AI category and better-reporting-that-Ed-Zetron-box. I'm going to keep his machine inferences under wraps.
Guess this is under the editorial because somebody having a nuanced take on machine learning is impossible now with this naughty journalist seeking those hot, HOT scoops! It's over-editorialised now, huzzah.
(This was shared with a programmer, btw Non-attributional to me.) Is this what is foretold? New positioning is developing, new tribes and informal groups are forming, people are picking, people are selecting.
Another Cartesian graph. I'm going to have to make another.
Is this the future with the things are going?
Regardless if a publisher likes it or not. On all the platforms. There's a whole world out there, with all the manners and matters.
The coders are keeping it hidden, and I guess I don't want to budge. Great thing about being a long-form blogger, that is the micro-bloggers may not read this. Certainly hating prosumer such more.
(this was from Ethan Mollick, who's into tech journalism, foundherently better. Will be reading his book. )
Phrenology, and you are the product with prosumer ai-detection.
Well, even with doctrinaires still madden me. Here's idea/expression dichotomy. The law does not protect genre, good one too. Idea's can't be selecting, they're collectively owned by the commons, and then there's the way that I'm going to happen. Expand the conception of copyright till it's impossible.
whenever someone suggests that a webtool can detect AI images, I do check them against: 1. a digital illustration 100% hand drawn by me 2. a photomanipulation created by me 3. a video game screenshot, unedited and taken by me so far, not a single "AI detector" has ever got 2 out of 3 correct that is WORSE THAN USELESS. "Determining which images have been created or altered with generative tools" isn't even a use case for gen-AI, somehow okay, well, that's your right, OP, but just so you know the linked tools were: wasitai.com [failed 1 and 3, correctly identified 2 as "not AI"] and thehive.ai/apis/ai-gene... [failed 2, said 3 "might include some AI elements", correctly identified 1 as "not AI"] usually I delete quote posts if the OP blocks me but I guess I'll let this one circulate, it's important to be aware of the limits of these apps. the best tool for detecting generated images and text is and remains: your human eyeballs. sorry
Magic bullet solutions
Video on educational applications.
Education industry complex, what are you going to do huh?
(There's a reference to gentilia storage.) Averages, I do not mind making a stream of consciousness response/reaction, yet at this time it's all meant to be forgiven. Time for another way.
You want to see a dead body?
Yet with all this computationalism, with Ai being the medium and the metaphor, it's now a claim ot explore this and how it's deplored. It's like we are in the stage of where with our media, it's becoming our metaphor with learning what it means to distribute our labour into our hands.
This content farm will continue and fix what is not broken. Delivering to their audience fast and cheaper, it's react-slop like them all.
Well, Thank you, Hume Is-ought gap, between exchange value and use value, and with direct response marketing and brand marketing in this age of information age.
What's on the marxist labour theory of value tube today? What's on the woob tube? I'll keep editorial control here and commitments.
In Couch Gregor attempts to have an opinion on statecraft. See this as the research scrapbook where I draw inspiration on where to fictionalize.
BadMouse, some say he's gone ideological shopping, I'd say he's become foundherent with the syncretism that we currently reside. I don't think his ML videos fully hit the mark, some still believe in it like the Finnish Bolshevik, I'm not. Can only wish the anarchist well as he goes his merry way with my own liberal to Ancom
Really, it's all a journey, ain't it? I'm not like I have anything else to lose in these unauthorized.
Guess this is the alternative to the copyright, which require virality of exposure and advertisers within a computational prospecting for attention economy these days.
Tbh, Welfare > UBI, it's still too much of a libertarian idea even if it's tried in Ireland.
So this is the idea of the right to the city, well, that's the policy of decommodification along with the state-craft to be taken, do recommend following this chap.
These are all policy changes though, radical systemic changes that sow the seeds to the creeping, changing urbanism or our society that are meant for the community action. Be it for the quiet revolts that happen underneath this domain.
So with these contradictions that will form, they will happen, the foundherent resolving as these hierarchal, horizontal alignment of distribution. Wonder what Finnish Bolshevik is doing? Oh, Talking about dialectal materialism theory and atheism.
I wonder if I'll keep following, haven't gone through his body of work fully.
The amazing atheist happened to drop a video, and he was an opportunist, I decided to check out that video in the bibliography, it was edgy calling Sargon a pick me grifter. Honest with Thunderfoot and his Anita whining. Welp, Thank you for trying to do a cogent video.
Only I respected Daniel Dennet.
What's happening on 1dime? I watched this long-form essay, everbody is splitting off again.Ah, Marxism, it may have disinformation or not. Thanks anway 1dime, you may be called a liberal, yet I know doing edutainment for the masses could be a thing, even if some argue it's a stepping stone.
Now, here's the question, am I Marxist? I'm an entertainer first, not a fighter. Yet I know conflict theory has influenced many an action flick and provided tension, that's with Aristotle theory of the unity of opposites is.
Foundherent will be within the label though of what I do, into socialism.
So yeah, dialectical materialism only a means of anaylsis.
Rawwr Kyro is doing his ranting here with notes on Tech Journalism.(If you're new, check out my other notes on AI and licence in the search bar)
I must do this the strawman to feel carthesis to my audience. (image from Deja 98 Rom hack)
"MuH FREEDOMS'n HuSTle'n Propyright rights MICKY MOU-"
CRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCNCCCNCN Free Palestine! (Thats the thing, ain't it? It's not so simple as a dunk tweet or a microblog post It merely entertainment right?)
Let me clear some conceptual confusion.
A little petering out with News, welcome to journalism. It could be going completely public domain as things go on. The denialism and copyright self abnegation a defeatist dead-end, especially with the copyright-lets-be-under-the-kind-monopoly-of-disneys/nintendo-content-id-drm sort. I feel like I'm talked down like a child by westy liberals.
As copyright there to consolidate the distribution into capital. @tentacle.expert
"SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"
Aaah doctrinaires'n the anarchists, what to do. Always leaning in the sympathy of the Anarchist. Nightmare, asymmetric enforcement. What will happen when DRM and the commodification of scraping by big content will do? Will I'm not affiliated with that union like Lenin was. Class character first.
Are people in for a rude awakening once this DRM is applied?
Also, ain't Eddy Zetron and his bubble narrative bogus? NFT =/= Prosumer Gen Ai. Well, I've never listened to him anyway. He's still wiggling Coe? Meh. ...
(Now that I thnk about it, encruddificaton seems more like a absurd concept, even when I wrote about it. My hypocrisy alarm bells of a contradictory axis are going off. The only thing he's doing this is for his self-service now.)
I'm using my right in the editorial that hes... infamous grifting. The nft/genai comparison has done so much damage to the discourse. I've written about
Oh, he's got a diaper burping fetish, at least with my entertainment I put it under the legalese that it's fiction. Guess he's still doing his rounds a corrupting the entertainment industry.
He's name-searching and sending petty malpractice insults. Why is he the prophet and gospel to anti-ai dogma?
I'm outta there! No more digital nobel savage. I'm the excavator.
Well visual media has its own drawbacks, cartoon discourse ain't conductive, and it ain't hiding the malpractice of the dog piles I'm seeing on Bluesky I don't know why I'd say this. I'm not going to answer the dismissive hustling, it's not for me. Such is a mob rule and the wilful disinformation now.
"Just let me work! Anything. Desperate. Make me silly mindless entertainment. Do whatever specification you want sire, anything to serve! I want job. I need to prescribe as-written instructions"
Texas sharpshooter Fallacy anyone with this discourse with the talking points refuted?Does microblogging facilitate it. It's why I don't post some of these blog posts there. The biggest danger is that the discourse and comprehension they are getting are from a meme, and that's the discourse now.
Twitter and bluesky have destroyed discourse so that's, why I try to limit myself, it's indulging in the techmonoplitic manipulations that Neil Postman warned about in amusing ourselves to death.
Please, denialism and hustle ain't going to answer this question west, expertise going to lead ahead. "It's boring and it will go away!" Nope. I learned with the NFT stuff that this stuff is still present.
Oh, Even now, it feels like excuses to hustle more.
Even with the crash, will it be lose-lose (that's how a doomerist views it, I take it as neutral continuously.)
This article goes into the prosumer, marketing terms design for direct response and says these are statistical inference.
Link on don't be a A**hole of impossible principle and ideals. By my reflection of this thread on Tumblr. Paternalistic inspiration P*** will not be tolerated within my platform.
(Oh, I look and try and digest takes) Such as this retweet. I don't retweet in bluesky because of the fickle followers. You are one of the good ones though, who can trust an editorial and an opinion and not a short, quippy and wrong dismissal. I'm entertaining Neil Postman's amusing ourselves to death when I'm using that format. @eleanor.lockhart.contact another thing people don't realize when they fantasize about "the AI crash" is that you're going to see a *lot* more slop and harmful use of AI whenever the big companies do crash, because the crash would drop GPU prices drastically & make cybercriminals etc. training models much, much cheaper"
Oh, that is an idea with all these marketing predictions, something to take account for a preparation.
According to this Test which I felt it was polarising and misrepresentative, I entertained it again. Did my own Ai-identity, which reflected my one and only position. You're free to take it.
Many takes on the thread. Another Typology as an intuition pump to understand this. Well, it's a Cartesian graph again of positioning marketers use.
Find myself in agreement to this.
Now as Anil Dash with his own decentralised AI models that are plural, is it forbidden of Green version? Remix culture'n all that I lean on.
He even linked to the video, antitrust leads to trust, I take it.
Welp, Good luck with that with Really Good AI. Kyro will do what he does, Squashinghe west military industry complex.
I'll prepare for a new doomerist movement. I'm not going to associate with this anti-vaxx that's left coded, it's malpractice. Not much vision for the future other than the eternal present. This will cause hijacking and destruction.
Key 🗝 🦊 @keytryer.net· 2d Current anti-technological trends have no imagination of what the world looks like after this. They want an eternal y2k and an artificial ban on computation. "It doesn't matter if you cure cancer, if no one can be a doctor anymore." It's bleak to me.
Unless we build an alternative.
There will be, as an antitrust egalitarian I propose a right to the city
oh look my EFF stickers have arrived
Regardless, the discourse has regressed on Bluesky. Thank you for reading my rant.
Now for this version of this Post and forming a rant as I become kitsch like this post. This is my scribomania making another post to see if I can act out from this. Well, here's me looking into the lifestylism.
Human Sloppers, Ai Sloppers, anything that already fills the search engines. Stochastic Seo servitude. Well, Fwopman happened to say stochastic parrot, I do say with big content and Alexander Avile refutation, With the statistical inferences of deductive and inductive processes;.
Short term, self-absorbed seo cargo culting. Even with radical opposition, it becomes a dependence (Was Martin Heindigger to point that out?) Mmm, better be quiet with the Confuseopoly swindles.
It's doomerism cult. Short term and selfish, Welp, Like an advertiser.
So when if all the time to build a coalition firsthand, a tribunal of the others and important allies that can help satisfy the needs, and punish to fit the responsible course. They can be placed within trust.
So, with the cool-hunters, the cultural conservatives, There's only the right to the city that will remain
"You gotta slop it up! 🎶" This song is stuck in my head as I did not invite it, it's a deviation of you gotta pump it up from the substance
That's life huh, well, Sturgeons law of 90% is that there is stuff to ignore. Curation time! Curation for amelioration.
In the fitness news today, sombody I trusted ended falling down. I'm not surprised. Since I'm perptually brought to be made to report on the fitness news, there a plenty of experts.
The problem with a doctorate is when somebody reads it, putting this here.
"This is the appeal not to the highest standard, it's the appeal to the lowest possible standard" Ouch. The largest mental model.
I don't follow the fitness drama that much, everybody loves drama because it fishes for the commodified attention, yet we know I'm going to serve you a snippet here since editorials here are meant to spill the tea, so here's the tea.
Everybody needs drama, everybody wants tantrums, everybody wants something they editorialize about. According to some communities, nothing can editorialize about, yet one of the things that feels litigable (that's etymology for a tribunal, a tribe play'n quarrel) Then it's time, that's the quarrel of quarrels.)
Yet I did not care that much about Mike here and now.
Personally, I'll have to moderate the volume at my gym and hope that my hernia gets recovered.
Follow up, you don't have to watch, I ain't ya dad!
Sorry, Sometimes I like my slop'n clickbait. ( Or if somebody will call Clear argumentation from a physicist. Stiring the pot. )
Skull for memory, No reference. Continuing the diplomacy or discourse of AI, well, On here atleast.
Have you watched Alex Avile and the backlash to the backlash to the backlash? Welp, you are in it right now, I've been trying to build bridges. I'd recommend you watch this before you become here.
I must commend Alex for not taking his video down, this odd collusion of hollywood conservatives that are hijacking and destroying movements needs to be noted.
(Cw, human rights rambling from a tired couch. Including a bit of a socialist analyst) Aaah, The defeatist, misrablist dead end of copyright, if Harlen can call them the 7th circle of hell with publishers, maybe I can place a spicy opinion here.
Silence is capital, another monopoly, when everybody is trying to build trust on the internet, the editorial confessions roll out. Along with the drab examination of the liberal centrists who'd happen to defend the private proporty relations from consolidating commidy value, oh, such a thing that you could state
Journalists don't owe the entertainment media pr any slack. Alex Avile self-publishing that Nickles group disclosure. With such is the diplomatic to the copyright maximalists that he got crudded on. It's always a game, troll bait, and a hornets nest that does not have. He did not sign a non-disclosure deal unlike those of the copyright alliance did so he did a community service.
There's something awfully centrist with publishers wanting to consolidate the means of distribution then raise the commodity value of art, really? Is that the culture industry, I do commodity fetishism
From Deepdreamnights, a public domain artists.
"The anti-AI side isn't actually anti-AI, they're pro-regulatory-capture-of-AI-by-Megacorporations. The copyright anti-AI argument conveniently leaves it open for Disney, Warner Bros, Nintendo, Sony, the RIAA, all to make their own AI systems to lower their production costs, because they own more than enough material to make powerful datasets. They get it, you don't, worst of all possible worlds."
It was actually a very thematically important foreshadowing arc setting up the Online Artist Community™'s tragic descent into the very thing they sought to destroy (people who want to expand the digital mechanisms to enforce the concept of ownership of .jpgs)
So yes, in light of this new info, I'll be keeping a meter at the CYA copyright enforcement that will only entail a unsafer internet. It's there to empower publishers, not the artists.
xormetric @tentacle.expert· 08/01/2024 SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. Who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"
There are plenty of rights more important than copyright, freedom of expression is one of them, including the freedom to assembly and to protest. Yet it's alarming, so I'll keep a head low her and be sure to differentiate the western artists from the lower working classes.
It's why I've not been posting much, there are absurd paranoia brewing, and it's getting bleak, so sense of discussion as there no's certainty on this issue. Odd activities like Style phrenology along with echo chambers, doing research on this topic like it matters, people need to know the community service of Couch Gregor.
Yet this dirt-digging and wild speculation of ad-hominins only means that they're creating a spectre of free like Nintendo does with its own copyright, only that will understand that this time it's left everybody on the statecraft map in disarray.
I'll leave out with another quote retweet. It's a understatment that this DRM enforcement is going to accidentally be the most second order pro-ai, the bad pro-ai move that's going be, a worser regime overall.
So freedom of expression > copyright, the publishing script puts too much in the hands of publishers and record labels.
@valkyrie.hacker.gf Follow we're literally going to get mandatory DRM brain implants at this rate
I feel weird being in the "middle" on the AI Argument. The hype machine is out of control, but the anti-AI crowd is almost as crazy with the only redeeming quality being that they have very little control over anything.
I think that generative AI is anywhere from "a cute toy" to "mildly useful in limited contexts" and that Big Tech companies did nothing wrong in training genAI models the way they did because a stricter reading of fair use would risk disallowing many types of transformative work.
I think that the way it's being deployed by the hype-mongers is frequently irresponsible and sometimes deliberately attempting to provoke backlash. I think the long-term destabilizing impacts are minor compared to the overreaction dynamics at play currently.
Like the video model demo from OpenAI recently where they generated a fake closed circuit video of Sam Altman stealing GPUs from BestBuy or w/e seems like it must've been calculated to spook people.
(My response to the hype mongers is well, sex sells, for better or worse.)
Based on social media, you might think the US was in the middle of a Butlerian Jihad. But IRL neither party has shown much appetite for regulating AI; universities aren't trying to ban it; content industries are adapting to it. The venting is anti-correlated with change.
This is why no one is writing 10k words a week to counter Zitron's ~10k words about the uselessness of models, inevitability of collapse, &c. You don't need to write 10k words every week arguing that the moon should continue to orbit the earth. People who like the moon's orbit can chill.
I look at Alex Avile for speaking the truth, yet the Tailism of other entertainers along with the inanity of media monopolists. Those who consolidate the distribution. Means That one should always caution with publishers being friendly, there is already an agonise going on.
The show must go on, and the show must go on, and the show must go on.
Yet I know being a host I'm going to move one as with my own means.
Or should I do ruthless expose, revealing the truth, go for ideals? What is a host going to do when the issues hit close to home and you have to make a stand? All rhetorical.
Ideology, materialism. I can't understand call-outs these days within political action and then there are the entertainers who happen to dazzle away and do not care, yet with the creation of slop, with understand. Silly waves of attention, silly waves of attention.
Ah, This will never be a call-out, only a dismissal channel. Like I left Anita Sarkeesian, and others, I simply moved on with the push and pull of belief systems tugging me in different directions.
Entertaining hosts and an editorial call-out artist, an essayist who tries to make some better of the slop, With it although, they can only say that the show must go on. Welp, we are going to be living with provocateur bait and panic averages stuff.
Oh, and there's a link to the Clanker slur discourse, which is a silly hilly to die on. Yet another reason why some mis-foundherent ways of social media discourse can't be taken seriously. Despite the adultism, the discourse has got, naive, coarsened thanks to the media. Thanks internet. White people hijack everything.
"I don't want to die on this hill. I think this is hill is dumb. I don't even want to be on this hill. I don't think this hill should exist. I have just found it impossible to ignore."
""Presumably they imagine that this will only ever hurt people who are inordinately attached to technology. Unfortunately, disabled people tend to be extremely attached to technology, because they use it for their hearing aids, artificial limbs, and everything that lets them use a phone or computer" < (From @xanadian.bsky.social)
(Since I've decided that economic downfall is going to continue to get more incredulous, I'll decide to do my own research. More commentators are referring to "Bubble" in quotations.)
(I guess, even with the pre-conceptions and fundamentalists view I'm not a fundamentalist btw, I'm going to leave this one, hopefully they'd use this info reasonably and responsibly. As I'm typing this there are more commentary on the Sora video thing that I'm not going to further comment, not my job.)
Noting and responding to these events is what journalist does with editorial control. Seeing another silly spectacle of narratives in the west always baffles me as I try to evaluate one of the hobbyists here.
Hmmmph, Yep, not going to pop according to this Reuter's article, yet, I know it has not done honest reporting before, yet I trust it here (There was an reporting error within another geopolitical thing that I forgot.)
Okay time for another opinion piece, non-fiction, yep I only write for those who don't tire of it. TBH, nobody on microblogs can read this long anyway, so this is a tactical choice on my part.
This is better at envisioning concepts of the current discourse of AI, thanks, I'll take that positioning axiology. Another collection of notes as I research this technological determinist. ( This is according to him, I'm copy-pasting it. So that there is a clear discussion. )
Written before with my journalism that it's all about seeing what I can do to help out.
That's what copyright is btw, a state-sanctioned monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us. Yes, that's what I do with siding with the creative commons in terms of keeping the internet an open host. So it's a statecraft decision to say that it empowers publishers/publicists too much. Treating them as arbiters, not punishing them.
Copyright is the stuff publishers take from us when we go viral with a book deal, taking 95% percent of the profits once virality hits randomly, that's piracy! (Spoke like Bopkin Cappy there.) It's a publishing right, not a creative right like freedom of expression and assembly.
Yet here we are, having to pick allies, or be passive with this reading.
This propertarian manner, though, I have to reject it. An ascension on of such a legal fiction to a creative rights will have to do.
I've been trying to build bridges with diplomacy, because y'know what entertainers do is to not send death threats and continue to host a world of wonder. Guess those who serve of giving up their copyright to publishers have put me on the naughty block list, or I'll guess they'll do what I want with toxic positivity, statecraft correctness. I'm in complete agreement with Andy these discourses have become too erm, skirmish for me to keep track.
I'll have to fight for my autonomy within certain talking points that invade even the most reputable sources, stuff that I cannot trust now. (Water is a silly metric.) Could honestly do a libertarian socialist solution to all this ai-talk.
Youch, Look at those numbers.
Somebody wrote that the left (or, what I call the troglodyte left, or derogatory slur left) is built on performative bullying (Callout culture) and smug certainty (String Theory like what physicists say), Yet this subject still has that, non-certainty. So take that for what you will, it's only found on Twitter.
We're going to have to be diplomatic, or ignore it entirely. No point at romantising 2022 or even before NFTs, as with things, they're not so simple as a twitter 140 character count.
Deciding to not associate with anti or pro, or synth, I merely keep tract because to pick a side could lead into some opportunistic hurdles. However, I still resonate with the existential naturalism that I had during my atheist days, (still do) so now reading and commenting on such blogs, it's been helpful thought fodder.
I'll be keeping track of the info with this podcast on analysis with, Sam Harris?? Oh, he ain't ranting about muslims, hmmph. Welp, will document. It's called the last Invention.
I may describe myself as a Preparationist, i had the Misrablism of Doomerism in this discourse.
For the sakes of interpretation, This visualisation model includes all interpretability of the models with explanations. Well, all reinforced that this lacks free will with pre-determined indeterminacy going into a gradient descent of probability.
Guess this is a frank confessional on state-craft. Examining ideologies and then moving back into diplomatic entertainment. This will be the most labelist piece, and all these are not to be pressures as I circulate through the ideological forces around my time and place.
DIPLOMATIC ENTERTAINMENT, even that has contradictions, don't you see? Yet here we go with another narrativising pull. As a host! Yet State-craft opinion is something for those who never tire of it.
Play this while I type, shall we?
Defeatism, miserablism. And Depressive hedonism. Is that the way of this little book, recommended by Alex Avile? It is all, merely gothic, gothic materialism of fragmented self dwindling in the vastness. I dig it. I've had to ameliorate with looking into the darkness and bringing the stuff out of me.
There's a lot to appreciate here, If I can skip the talks of Stalinism/Marxist Leninism then it's pretty good of capturing the mass media cultish zeitgeist that predominates our lives as capital is made to social, then it's returned in that of a realist mindset as everything is reduced into an exchange value of such with all the gift ecomonys returning into a questionable mirage.
Everything to be bastardized I guess, Or what was Marc Fischer's goal of acid communism to come up with from such concepts to our ends and desires, of such drab material gothic ends.
Then it goes back again. Yet his quote "It's easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism" Wow, that draws an image within the cosiere circles. They're all hidden away within private accounts of twitter now, 2018 was a way to go.
Well, it certainly shines a light of my own pluralist tendencies and ideological presuppositions. Twitter feels like it's regressed, along with its containment unit of Bluesky, and I'm here, wondering the hours like it shall get along. I keep flipping back and forth of the principles of anarchism and Marxism scroll from the site as things draw around from confessional after confessional, it feels like I'll have to examine all the statecraft structuralisations and introspect.
Now there's tension between the Luddites and the accelerationists with that tension, I cannot relate to the Luddites any more due to the guild failure, since with my own confession like with Harlan Ellison, even guilds and unions can sell out.
Even as a drift on, I'm resonating with Neil Postman's and Mark Fischer's Accelerationist. One that is different, one with technology. Yet now, at this rate, We are to deal with such contradictions as of now.
Why, oh why, do I happen to come, where every artist justifies making money with Michelangelo and Shakespeare commercial plays, that the Mona Lisa was a non-profit project. Oh, such a complication.
1Dime, Badmouse, Finnishbolshevik (A little, one video on libertarian socialist rants), and Burn These books, Noj Rants. I keep reading these statecraft books. I'm not even as I can speak with authority as a drifting fabric on soviet historiography. Undecided as a ponder through, I've still got the society of the spectacle silently judging me as try to incorporate it within the fictional complexities of my artwork.
Thanks for reading. I'll get back to it. Along with the labelism. Your still going to get labelled anyway.
(Oh, and you're wondering why there cannot be between unity, I think of this by Badmouse, could not fully follow him when he left the ml space, yet with the time he's become a libertarian socialist. Welp, that's what ideological primordial souping does to you. Still like his electorlism, and baby vaush video minus the adultism.)
(I don't even watch Vaush, guess a lot of info has been revealed about him that Badmouse was incorrect about, oh well, that's truth value)
Neither Techonopoly of mediamonopoly (That's what copyright is btw, state-sanction monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us), It could be the with the right of the city and with being "A loving resistance fighter", or a diplomatic entertainer. So that we can move past such a pleasure principle and interpassive proconsumerism that we can see our own cycles.
Deep, man. Some concepts to take and give away, was he really pushing for a space-communism? Or was it meant
That's what these stream of consciousness happen though, hypocrisy naturally emerge, then with error theory they are naturally for a better collaboration. Or 'better' means monopoly/monopsomy.
Addendum:
(Further post-edit note, I'm not following Cory Doctorow much now, he's right on copyright yet this time to understand encrudificaiton, it has to go deeper than that when it comes to host service deterioration.)
Remember something similar, not directly, when it comes to the tastemaker and trendsetter, that's with economy and the strength of joy? Being the centre of the entertainment marked with a mawkish fence sitting, universal appeal, a goofy little grin and a candy of the family friendly comfy. Dangerous statecraft and regime status quo.
Yet you've got hacks when it comes to PR, come on all as it's with a thousand lawsuits bougie investments. Licensing only cares about privatisation of property, making style and then scraping next, what will that silly mind come up with?
Bu-Bye!
My own comic is under notice and too off-model for you, so I'll guess I'll get away with it.
When mass entertainment and its apologists happen to carry the banality on, a company not related yet affliated with disney must give the audience what it wants.
That's cultural conserve where everything must be contained, the releived for the kiddies.
Welp con-serve, the serve as a service that's made clear.
Servicers of vendors are to be expected, as the hacks from the art.
The great gatsby was written by a copywriter.
Jessica Price (from Bsky) I'll leave it the retweet here.
@delafina777.bsky.social
I need people to understand that Disney has not been a force for good in decades, if it ever was, and that it’s understanding of stories as a pacifying rather than liberating force rivals Christianity’s.
It’s the First Lady of the status quo, the quelling soft power.
"Juan Escalante
@juansaaa.com
DISNEY: Wins 5 Emmys for ANDOR, a show about resisting fascism
ALSO DISNEY: Bends the knee to the federal government and suspends Jimmy Jimmy Kimmel for resisting fascism
Disney, probably better than any other corporate storyteller, has a finely honed sense of exactly how much liberation to season its stories with to make you feel like progress is happening, things are better than they used to be, the arc of history is one of inevitable progress.
That is true on both a micro and a macro level. It’s big enough to let some queer artists, artists of color, artists who wanted to tell countercultural stories, have a little corner of the spotlight. Why not? It’s not going to tank Disney. Have fun!
They can tell their stories and you can marvel that they got funding and meanwhile Disney will help make sure very little changes on a legislative level.
Sure! Have some stories about revolution! Stories that make you feel good, rather than angry. Stories about things getting better.
And hey, even a few that might make you angry, or might not feel good, or might make you question that status quo a little.
The thing is, the Disney pot is big enough that that little bit of spice isn’t going to noticeably change the spice level of the entire stew.
The biggest projects are going to reinforce the status quo, and that’s enough that they probably don’t even need to disavow any of those little projects.
Disney is status quo soft power, the First Lady who listens sympathetically to the children at hospitals dying because health care isn’t affordable, who raises funds for some of the photogenic ones, and you think hey her husband can’t be that bad, look how compassionate and beautiful she is.
Never forget how much faster things would become public domain if it weren’t for Disney. Never forget how it treats its laundry workers. Never forget how it insisted on being the government of a bit of Florida.
Disney is not going to meaningfully stand up to the powers that be because it’s one.
I think escapism is vitally important to emotional health, and also, I think Disney uses it to make you nod along rather than rebel.
Look, I fell for it a few times and I get it, but in 2025 I need you to know that every giant corporation out there would harvest you for parts of it thought it could get away with it, and most brands are owned by one of those corporations.
And no, it’s not all profit-driven. The idea that corporations are purely rational actors is itself propaganda."
Welp, A legal fiction, a collective popular appeal. Informally, I'll put this by solar sands to help with this. The john lockean concept or monopoly that's bound with the legal framework of copyright, (Makes me sympathetic to the concept of copyleft.)
I'd rather cooperate than compete, yet who's interests here are being served, a utopian infinity of might?
ICYMI here's Solar sand's video on this.
I mean, this is was copys will happen, it will continue, and why I boycott Disney from mid 2016's, Welp, there you go. Visual effect artists are going to have to wrestle with the new teck as the time going forward. Oh boy, I'm going to explain my positioning again.
(The minecraft got a hit, merely shows how small these sectors of the internet are with all these things going on, yet don't worry, I appreciate you reading this.)
So yeah I'll forever be fair in my characterisation of these centrist publishers, the panopticon of direct response rates. Mmm, Still in the building, are they?
In attempt to develop an opinion of NFTs, couch Gregor does his research.
(This whimsical, low effort doodle is the only positive thing, other the thing at the end.)
(CW, abuse, slurs. And terminally online xwitterism Twitter artists used as a derogatory slur. )
A speculative, volatile market, it's marketing that Seth Godin has dismissed. ( Yet there are contradictory sources, had to check the Wayback Machine. It's an editorial, though, So I'll make my mind up. It seems more incoherent now )
I like it when I test my ideological presuppositions challenged
Welp, what were my experiences?
I was off, playing and depressed with League of Legends before this fad or not.
Yet things change, don't they?
Short version. Even it hinted at the climate thing that I'm considering. Oh, look it's more death threats, look, if you retweet and post death threats. I'm going to treat you as a mere acquaintance. It's not within my entertainment etiquette.
Bullying, doxing, suicide, wow, thanks I avoided the liberal circle and have not spent my days there.
Well, putting this account here, if you don't want to look at the full essay, I've been at it.
Here's him getting sidetracked on xwitter drama, it's amazing on YouTube you can post so much xwitter drama now. Unlearning has done a Sowell now, which this libertarian with this time.
You don't even have to agree, yet he political convenience talking points that a propped as a means of twitter statecraft authority and response rates, No thank you, Dan, You were wrong here, empirically I'll have gone with experience.
Oh look, the obituary list so I guess it ain't dead. Where Micrological artists can continue to have a nice pint in the pub and wait for this to all blow over.
Yeah, he's right wing he admits, and a libertarian ancap (urgh did I admit to something along with lines of agreement, what a strange world) yet death threats? Sexual assault? Seriously, please. Please 😫 No more of that crud. On an advertising platform. An Advertising blog, panopticon made crazy.
The claims of environmental are similar, hmm.
So I decided to extend an olive branch, since there have been a movement towards cryptography with this technology, there's going to have to be another way to understand are foundherent conceptions of property rights. It cannot wait.
There's this guy who's got a Brian L Fyre papers, which are free to read. I enjoyed his comments on Marx being a literary landlord. Examining the contradictions within property laws, I do like to see it. As somebody who believes in the withering with creative commons laws, good on you. Cannot comment on the NFT open sea thing, though.
Some can't do statecraft action, rather than entertain.
( I'm using the term statecraft to mean politics here, yet I find the term statecraft way cooler in what it's expression here )
Rant poems No politics? That's a duty, yes.
Statecraft as Plato will like to call. Commercial Strategy.
Or, that's what they say. Some entertainers and prosumers go. Yet, learn to be hack.
Well, deontological, yes, that you're right. Yet, things to get complex with my frustration of being an activist of an act of futility on YouTube and twitter. It has not gone well.
"Doesn't affect me, don't care." as the rights are being collectively taken away. Then have a right to be shocked when it ends up effecting them." - Dynasour The doing my job, or until somebody else will, was a basis made n fundamentalism Kind of Schrödinger's law, hey get the bag. The hustle, well, here we are. You don't need to do activism, I can find it distasteful and mis-directed.
Yet I confess that I cannot be doing political action do, I have to do art and entertainment. Ohh, How it tells us about, the cupboards we share. Some people are need to be left there. Guess this has shuck us everything up.
I completely understand, I'll minimise polemics. It's open hosts with everybody firing in multiple directions. International conflict and community, what do you do with it?
I'm doing these editor books as entertainment now, even if my training ain't going to be registered.
"World W**** three, Batman P***, Sign my D***"
"Writing has to be one of the loneliest professions in the world" Really chuck?
"You don't write to make friends" - Joy Williams (Within the weird plot/dialogue chapter I did not make sense off) Robert Mckee had a better book on dialogue.
He shares random, separate quotes, his bios with working with advertisers and writing is the most interesting.
Despite making edgy jokes and autism it feels mis aimed, it does not really feel that reactionary. It's selective with our ideas, as I did feel like what he's trying to come at from his perspective of behind an art's degree.
Maybe I'm jaded, though.
All ideas and public resonance with advertising being a crap shot, many does not know that Chuck was trying to compartmentalise reading David Foster Wallace along with other books and trying to process those feelings into a book of advice and going. "If you were my student"
He tends to go Respectability>Likeability within a character, that's where the character traits align of the patterns of the mode of a sympathetic Protagonist.
"Don't do dreams in developing tension" Well, David Lynch may have a disagreement with that. "It's my instructions I was taught" Okay Chuck.
3/5 first chapters
Next is the process. Ideation. Talks of piracy, talks of superheros doing inexplicably things with the comic writers, he's an unfriendly sort, yet you expect his ideation to travel and flow through.
Then at the times when it comes to the idea where he takes you, it's the most outlandish, off-the-wall ideas with his Hollywood formula which I'm most likely never going to follow, or maybe I do, if you've got your pattern-seeking eyeballs up.
Dirty entertainment book, maybe it will be used as reference, I'd prefer the Story Grid or Robert McGee.
What a dirty, dirty boook. DIRTY! Slap it with a rolled newspaper dirty!
3/5 still, pick'n choose.
(Oh, the best part was him dealing with hungry advertisers about not delivering enough eyeballs to the Superbowl, shows how advertisers of short-term and self-absorbed as they could not handle his character. )
