scare quote sneer quote

A lot of quotation of groups which show hate.

Thats a matter beyond my control.

There are groups that happenes to put groups into reductionist little dismissals.not Holistic, ( Not wholesome, marketingese for direct response like a commercial aaa studio wanting to appeal to the broadest possible audience, or simply mass marketing. That could be a commodity fetishist approach. )

Oh, how "groups" see the "picture" then make it "work?"

See? Made my sentence more suspicious with those quotes. Lie without lying.

Something to note.

ouroburosian

 Well, This is what happens with the self-reference, unlike if it revives and reinvigorate.

The problem with tautologies that they can exist purely on a theoretical plane with no batting back and forth of ideological with all the understanding, the pushing forth. Almost like as if it was selective.

Same as obsessing over a fixated piece of evidence. 

An atheist must concede some points to the theist to see if they are not intellectually designed. With the theism and tradition being ingrained with the culture.

I ain't a theist. Maybe that a compatibilist ways of having faith into responsibility or believing into a faith.

Its not contingent.

Who's afraid of gender?

I've tried to put gender into my art, with it taking it seriously rather than an annoyance.

Oh Judith Butler, haven't read the others yet this one without the audiobook experience, and it's the anti-gender movement that's within the growing collective shout and other evangelical groups, this is a ideological dissection by an anarchist. (Expect the words authoritarian and totalitarian to be used here and there, although I don't think such of a meaning given my own position.)

It does get in the core clarification to sex/gender as a co-construction with Anna-Faust-Sterling, and it's the best part, along with shooting down how gender is an imperialist invasion made by the Vatican. Such a matter is a physio-semantic construction of not understanding what gender within the conservative groups. It is all but a phantasm.

Such is a matter to transition from fundamentalism to foundherentism in terms of epistemological structures that we are to see a shift from these ruling and attacks, from collective shout and the moral majority.

Alex avile and Abigail Thorn, two youtubers who have delves into such a matter for defending transgenderism. If you'd like the light version.

( Oh, and the note of the lack of literacy of those who have merely read the bible along with those who have seen YouTube videos is something to note with the audiences to this kind of regressive campaigning, some have only read the bible, some others read minimally. Others have circled with the books, so this bookspeculation. )

symmetrical reasoning, symmetrical couch Gregor with fallacys

I look at the primal inner motivation by Robert McKee's character, editor.

What is satisfying way to see the alignments of all reasoning going in a palace of two uniting opposites.

Yet that is a balance fallacy. Justice/injustice is being threatened and resorted, yet at what fence do these things lay?

I used to believe with the fallacy, being a liberal gay

Oh, only with such simplistic beliefs, and there are ways of knowing that hold with narrativising with ones that go along with our own day. Balance fallacy and Black & White fallacy seem to be opposites, yet we forget those are made with informal fallacies that require empiricism to back up those assertions up.

Oh, it does translate well within making energy within narratology, such as life and death within an action, or a black and white values of a painters brush and transition.

Yet such a matter does not translate into a world of politics, especially politics.

It's not so simple with it comes to handling injustices on a societal level.

Ideological pick & mix argumentation

My historygraphy, I can't see without my historiography.

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_Clinic
Ah, those who argue, it's full of it on the internet.

The arguments, why such a matter of ipse dixit is a matter of what happens when you go on the Internet.

Hmm Seth..

Dogmatic circles, such things, go in circles informally to help us through the day like breathing air. Yet at such a time when an argument that it's going to happen with arguing with a gender denier. There's something about it that they simply don't want to listen, to see if they are arguing within bad faithed troglodyte.

That's the problem with such a matter, they are either trying to argue from a fundamental precept of informal groups within thick tanks and so forth.

Since trolling and spamming will exist since the internet follows through, it's a matter to know how much we are products to our social media sites with these bad actors, or the tantrum industry complex is being fuelled. It's not a matter of childism, adultism, and maturity, it's seen the gap of illiteracy that challenges our own ways of seeing.

Arbitrary contradictions and inconsistency lead into another turn. Preach to the own choir here.

Psychosis not, From Anti-theism Physchobabble in a subsect of Anti-Ai

 https://minihf.com/posts/2025-07-22-on-chatgpt-psychosis-and-llm-sycophancy/

Nope, I don't think this covers psychosis, it's reminding me of the way atheists accused theists that they are crazy. This was refuted, and it's not going to happen. The insane asylum ain't coming back.

No no no, let's not try and bring the insane asylum back. With the method being in the madness.

Moving past of the Victorian insanity accusations, we are to make it our pursuit to see how we can decipher and see mental illness and disability as a thing to go with, and that means AI too.

I could point out a bunch of men and suits with money as a bunch of freaks, yet that does not go to the heart of ideological and material conditions. It's going to get unhistorical.

Eschatology, End times have been with us all this passages, Yet's that associated with all cults like scientology and bebops comet. Including, I must say, Atheism science fiction.

survivorship bias

 Overlooking the fact there are so many, from the ad creep, the ad creeping horizon of expectations. With the crawling sigma grind set and the crunch culture. That happens to be the case of the odds one out with courses.

Swimmers body all over again, instant results, before and afters, edits, get the she-bang in the flash, transform in the snap of the fingers.

Yep, too good to be true 
Survivorship bias, like fallacies, are informal fallacies which can't be quantified and need credibility to back it up. I'm going through my own experience with this.

Should include western ballet thing, yet that's my campism and politics talking. Still reassessing my own positioning on that matter, and will have to come back to you with another editorial.

Never good enough for industry and us

Since i had to check out thought slime some more, here's my fave. Second to the hard work and Garry Vee.

Myself resonating with the anarchist critique of hard work and art commodification, being defined by price. Brings back to the image of imperfection that's back to wabi-sabi. Bad art, slop, it comes for all our lives, since it ain't an exact qualifier, it can't be made.

By good enough, that means the objective infinite money, apparently.

Licensing Ad Creep? ancaps with there license creep

It's time to revive argument debate garbage-bag ideology

Did I hit my head to ancaps?

That absurd place Seth roasted them now. Economists have dismissed, and still, still they persist, persist like troglodytes under the pretensions to be well-read. They called it a pipe-dream, yet it's still more a bone-dry slave.

Boosting this, Rynd was not a libertarian. It was an odd set of traditions that led into a new set of circumstances. Even anarchists have a historical background and justification, along with Pluralist and other ologies.

As they say, Ayn Ryad not apart from it.

Oh, I'll have to plug in thought slime, I'm going to have to see my own door into his mind, who embarrassed himself.

There are notes, notes of why that she observed and amazed by Scientific management and then making all here fictional hero's like robots of efficiency. Then that was with all the selfish 'objectivism' and self-interest making contradictions and pretensions to the temple of self-service, or the justification of that. More reactionary with that silly idea, and somehow the west gave here a platform, something unique with the conditions of that pro-slaveness, that happened.

Now any sensible argument or construction of subject/object is tainted because of that.

As an edutainer, I must leave with this song of their mantra.

Meliorism Lottery on Social media

Seth I still follow you, better or worse. 

I wonder what the growth tubers on social media are doing? Stuff that does not work. That course of trying to be one's own boss is still here.

Such a ceo-mindset of physcopoltic

Spams still spam, and advertisement led platforms are still entertainment platforms first, not fund-raising ones. Ad-creep is still ad creep, even with the infinity of the charity out there. International infinity.

Best know what limits.

This a reflection on influencer courses are garbage, here's why.

A lot of them are cropping up, trying to deterimine a cdp of commodity algorithm and market to feed, to makertise the unmarkerteriseable.

What a shame, maybe that thing of creativity and passion are internal and not verified like product are something, I dunno.

Tourmaline, Of our trans fighters. Marsha

Artfight trade with typmomentum

Wow, the writing of a queer sexworker and entertainer could have gone oxymoronic, it does not.

Marsha was killed, Marsha was persecuted, Marsh was into through hate. Through the stories of the Aids epidemic.

The beginnings of a hustler.

A hustler, that name was used complimentary here and not derogatory. Well, with my own baggage with the term. I guess, in the oligarchical logic of our term. That's merely another reflection of the westerns economic pressures that I can't happen to imagine yet feel sympathy for.

Emotional at the end of the contributions, with a redundant 'all rights reserved', don't worry, I'll tell my experiences. There were so many shades to an entertainer that brought to light as she dealt with the strife of the misogyny, transmisogony, and by the river.

What an effect it does have somebody, along with the law that ignore.

Ai Entertainment of infinite jest

Mass television is the most profitable, most attention getting device, and it's the matter where it's holding our interest.

They are cropping up, these other AI entertainment channels. Where they have their own Patreon and independent funding.

Guess I'm going to have to accept that. Are they finding a commodity fetishism with the neophliacs? The thing about slop being an indefinite category, meshing with human-made slop with elsa-gate. Is this slop, though? You decide.

We are way after Adorno with entertainment now.

I'm looking at Neural Vizz (@NeuralViz or the @TheTuringshow)@NeuralViz

Notes.

. Writing is the most important thing. Compelling it is for the narratological sketches of fiction. (XKCD managed to carry) It's merely mini-arch-plots and no anti-plots.
. Being direct with the AI usage, it seems to clear of llms and diffusion models with artistic ethics. Not necessarily infringing, and it's not to clear the political ethics, which my other editorials covered.
. Aliens? "Coming you live unlive"

. How to get one million squillion gazillions views, I guess technologists are racing for that mass virality in google search, never change. (I don't recommend ANY videos like this, recursive meta)

I'll repost that Ls Mark video. When I was most bitter and reading Doctorow.

I need to repost this to dispell search results. From these lottery diggers.
Guess it's not for me.

I watch as our infinite jests that continue. The Harlen Ellision Glass teat rant about hacks who cannot write themselves out of pay toilets. How the humans and mindlessness of Ais. The call of the given up artisans.

Dead Horses and advertisers, Commercial Scientism

It never ends, it's what advertising does.

Like betterhelp, they don't want to end, they want to get attention with their campaigning. Covered it before.

Campaigns are not meant to go away with a debate, over any axis and distinction. You'll see them again. Commercial Campaigning is like Imperial Campaigning, except is a war of attribution.

The terminology matters less than the response here, David Oglich himself did not call himself an artist, he wanted it to be a informational exchange.

Everbody talks about brand marketerising, what about direct response/conversion rate marketerisation.

The conversion rate that's ruthless, and scientism..

Will the behaviourist tradition of putting lipstick on a pig will work? Even a shrewd advertiser like Herschel Gordon Lewis. I'm honest with my fictional entertainment. Yet, it's extended.

Indefinitely for hierarchy.

S***s AI Udemy Review, and other clarifications

(I'll never sketch myself as the nostalgia critic again, and it's not even a coherent expression because it's old stuff, yet.)

Time to describe a bad decision. Following from Seth's Claude Dog Post , I've deliberately postponed this review.

Short version: I've tried my best to not make this an entertainment spectacle by making it into a format video with bells and whistles. Course I took is off-the-mark, and I don't recommend, I then think more about Licence quoting a Cryptography guy and calling it. Due to the illiteracy of licensing, I had to rewrite my TOS.

Longer version

I bought a course by Seth. I'm not convinced with my wabi-sabi tendencies.
I buy it so you don't have to! I'm going through my disagreements and snorting book reviews. Maybe out of parasocial relationship, I've decided to buy his silly course on AI.

Welp, Here are 35 pounds discounted. I could not resist. Most interesting was building a career without AI. Comparing it with the weather and the species like Kevin Kelly. Yet here we go with a another movement I cannot predict.

Then I was recommended of Midjourney and Claude from Seth, and to put it on Youtube, youch. I haven't been into perplexity as it was.

With the ideas here, I'm certain that he's going somewhere here with a workable plan. He had going with something with productivity and value and why others must go and be impresario. A leader and not a follower (ain't that what entrepreneurs do?) Yet, urgh. It's still 85 quid now of this writing.

Axiological arguments of value creation do not apply to a Taylorist Industrialist, by the way, I think he notes that himself, yet that means that with are own urbanism that we are inter-meshed now it's a subject to be explored. That he did within his song of sigificance, 

He then goes into tasks and projects, within how that such a thing will be driven my freelancer cobbler automation and that clients concerned about productivity by the industrialist would as Henry Ford, those are thoughts are another time.

He claims lawyers certain professions aren't gone out of in five years real estate broker, truck driver, a pharmacist, a daycare worker is inconceivably not going to be replaced.

So now I cover with better uses of what techno-domnion and techno-affliation with such a mindless thing, he draws on deterministic free will and Daniel Dennet's Intentional stance. Oh, He also makes a claim that people don't go to Hackneyed Movies from Hollywood any more, I get not courting their opinion. Yet, Disney get's traction.

What can happen with this though is Seth's attraction with determinism as a position compared to Dennet's Compatiblism in regard to interpreting free will when it comes to comparing this tech with autonomy.

I ended up writing the review. (It's going to be licence ramblings from now on. Already done it.

"As a wabisabi illustrator, Independent. The implications of using AI have reached wildfire within anti-ai, I hope copyright cases get turned down because being into creative commons licensing, attempting to out-license it ain't going to work. It's nice to see somebody try to cool the flames down.

It's inevitable that in our times, though, I guess illustrators are either going to embrace or walk the opposite direction.  Impresarios such as us.

I mean, What will happen with disconnection of this day and age. I do hope that there going to be more essays that don't muddy the waters.

Brings me back to Niel Postman's Technopoly, that's such a thing. What the implications with our own designs such as it will pursue the conflicts here. You're thoughts on Henry Ford are poignant.

Thanks."

Got my Certificate, eh, yeah. There's that credentialism that's apparently I have to show now. Ugh, Udemy.

Am I supposed to be proud?

Further notes.

Technopoly out of all the technological books, this felt the most relevant to what's happening today. Even with the last two. This was, despite the disagreement western bias of Cold War terms, eeriey similar to Alex Avile reported on within the second video.

Well, thanks, I guess. I don't think AI-philes will get much, AIphobes will get average with the end with Seth's plan for those who plan to not build their business with it average, cannot fully recommend. He does summarise his ideas in his next post, hmm.

Hmm. Time to revise positions again. Judging from my previous notes.

Considering Steve Klabnick has a similar to mine, with being wary'n technological puritan. Not a Tech opportunist. I'm simply not the industrial bottom line, not Disney, not Nintendo, not King who managed to lay off its employees.

Oh, It's still generative Ai, well that could be a marketing term right now. Now for the last notes.

. Jumping in bed with For-profit companies for content ID is not going to work, a nightmare system as it is. I'd wish they call it copyright infringement, but everything is loaded with RFAA terminology. It is even argued that it ain't the case, the push to make fair use and fair dealings obsolete to apparently control the diffusion models and LLMs. Trying to marketize style will only consolidate power.

Again, licensing tends to encourage monetize/marketerize-or-die kind of logic, which I'm trying to avoid.

. Environment is a loaded gun, none of the essayists or pundits than Alex Avile, fight me on that one. I'd have to limit my micro-blogging after this. Bluesky and Xshwitter aren't going to be deliberately misinformed licensing.

. Education and connections with controlling tech have been noted with Peter Thiel. Along with certain reaction streamers championing it (not all). They should not be taken seriously anyway, anybody who takes thou opportunist ambulance chasers are confirming Neil postman has said about Amusing ourselves to death.

12 minute video, apart from the thing, this is going to move towards a hyperreality. How it is malicious theory to control with aimless categorization and normalisation as the maths cannot be determined by those who preprogram it. I mean Alex Avile has already touched on educational programs who happen to use with the Khan Academy.

This is a question for future generations, and the ones that will come afterwords.

Merely shows how what's at stake here.

Maybe I'm drawing a close parallel to the postmodern villain that Video's Team wrote. Copyright will end with Disney wanting to license our thoughts.

Lets hope for copyright-gate by the sovereign citizen types

(Futurama with that the ad-creep on dreams)

I'm agreement back to Flippo

"Unpopular opinion: the pro-copyright anti-information freedom response to generative AI is reactionary, and it’s bad in all the usual ways reactionary things are bad.
The tech is here to stay. The only thing being decided as a matter of IP law is whether open models will be a thing, or if the big rights holders will get to make a lot of money by licensing proprietary models. As before, I prefer a world where information and tech are free and accessible.
Like, I understand "I don't want to be put out of a job" but I really don't get "I want the tool that puts me out of a job to cost $159.99/mo from Adobe who licenses it from Getty, so I can rest easy knowing it was not trained on anything I made". IP law can deliver the latter, not the former.
Right on cue. Perfectly legal licensed training data. For OpenAI, Midjourney, and Google. Not for open source models folks can hack on and run locally. (If the copyright maximalist doctrine prevails.) All the downside, none of the upside. Yay for copyright!"
He points to this link https://www.404media.co/tumblr-and-wordpress-to-sell-users-data-to-train-ai-tools/

So I pour it, the course and the discourse. I'll leave looking at the AI entertainment channels next time.

What do my characters think of Ai/Copyright?

Ai

Bopkin and Castella will endorse it, Bopkin an opportunity, Castella a means of confusion. Crump Marcy will look at the funny blur and get think it looks cool in a dizzy kind of way.

Bopkin will be in bed with that, wanting faster and Cheaper, like Doctor Robotinik. He'd probably shove it into a get-rich-scene and then fail
 
Rubarb and Muddel will be in the Dark.

CG encouraged by Bopkin, George by Marcy, Theo and Asheal will be curious simply because of the noise it creates by others. Couch Gregor will be pulled in different ways by Jaime and Bopkin.

Danny, Trist and Jaime will be to most rebelious of it, Kyro will consider it secretly, and abomination. Vera will say those filters ruin her complexion. Dutton and Sucker will object, Dutton Tradition, Sucker becuae it succccccccccccks.

Licensing politics

Bopkin will love to extend copyright to infinity minus a day, and copywright infringe report children who happen to draw that he can't sell into the marketerize. Castella will like the things like they are having. Vera will with the misconception. Dutton Traditionalist will follow with Theo. Rhubarb, CG and George will be pressured in to dubious licensing deals. One into a loophole.

Muddel don't think well, Asheal won't think about it, Marcy will attempt to do it in her accounting, and then it will not mind whichever flows.

Kyro wants to have no business for secretive reasons. Jaime want's it abolished for anarchism, Danny will go into peer pressure along with Sucker Sam. Trist will move towards a punk underground, not following any of that.

(As for myself, suspension. Another post )

Mass ad incompatibility, Post interruption ad age.

Television advertising ain't incompatible with internet, why?

Along with it's 90s origin, it was not meant to be like that. Designed for one to one with minimal video hosting.

Foundations on interruption advertising, with a platform especially without foundherentist lifeboat on the sea of the internet, it's a race to the bottom.

A rift of an internet and a mass marketer, the internet user, from world I inter was designed for a specific one.

People have written about it, Tim Wu and other ethicists to anti-consumerism. Tim Wu has written about it in with James William article being quoted. To saying the remote control is the first adblocker to exist. For the glamour medium, that's the one that draws in the most illiterate audience, and it's crowd.

(Not that bad movie when it comes with remote controls)

There's a rift now, even with marketers have noted with Seth (wow, quoting him again despite my criticisms ) https://sphinx.acast.com/akimbo/they-renottryingtobecreepy/media.mp3
I mean he has written about mass media extensively, perhaps with commodity fetishism, yet here we all see and notice.

Brad Guiger says that using interruption is akin to the shooting oneself in the food, Stephanie Sterling has moved to Patreon as with DJs Like Isaac Varzim. Others remove ads entirely, and Full Moon Matinée has removed it entirely.

Predictions of where mass advertising is going.

. Will still remain, as with all axiological concern, is suspended to make it continue with advertising campaign.
. Scepticism will still remain, any user who's based on the sole business model will have to make the sceptic feel right.

. Since it's not going to go away, Interruption advertisers will have to face that anarchists will continue to use it. That's always going to happen as they uncommercialise everything
. Lack of clarity of using interruption advertiser can lead to downfalls like Ello
. Advertiser-friendly and word-friendly words of babyspeak are and have contribute to adversial relationships
. Scamvertisements, unregulated, irresponsible interruption advertising. The Faustian bargain with them is that there is arguably the biggest race-to-the-bottom compared to subscriptions and direct donations.

. As noted with Matthew Barthmolows Ad-creep, advertisers and mass media have been equivocating free speech with commercial speech.

That's merely some of the challenges, as people set up guardrails.

Even Robert Mckee's stated that interruption advertising is going out, with statistics moving towards subscriptions and direct transactions.

Powerleveling/progressive Overloading I rejective!

Bading! As the table gets bells and whistles up the wazoo! Couch Gregor squeals in delight of his improved drawing tablet! "I could use some oc-drawings right now" says the art fighter. He gasps happily. "Wow! OC DRAWINGS FOR EVERYONE ! HAW HAW HAW" People of swarmed in OC drawings, physically they drown, digitally the entire servers at art fight erupt in flames then explode. Then, silence, then, sadness, Couch Gregor looks outside in shame as a LVL 90992093090290232 scribblers, then fade into black."

LEVEL UP! GET TO THE NEXT LEVEL get a million squillion with a level higher than the last importance!

Miles of crouton, this is for Physical overload, what about ideological overload? Or Cognative overload? Metabolic adaption? nah.

The metaphor of power scaling and progressive overload on distribution here is meant to induce direct response, iteratively and recursively forever and forever, of free freelance work on platforms prospecting to commodify attention for the interruption advertising. Ludology, well this is scarcity, choices and a system of affiliation and domination.

Basically, I described Social Media perpetual engagement model with how they serve interruption advertisers, as with subscriptions.

Atrophy from hackneyed recursions, stimulation of the novel, All the cognitive speeds and physical movement of my processes are an exploration, not the end result of a perfectionism of performance that the entertainment.

Oh, how wish it. Only a means of metamorphism and the ship of theses do I change. It's a licensing strategy, a copywriting means. Or we machine? Are we meant to do a performance report for assembly lines?

Oh status, levelling up, levelling down. It's all there to interrupt via the advertiser platform, zoom!

That's a pattern of thought to tingle with!! 🛋✨✨✨

Fanart, derivative grey zone. License reductionism Talk.

 No, we are below notice. As with the Seuss case.

I did Aggron within a neato butt.

This is why I'm https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ including my blog, including my ideas. Disney and Nintendo are too litigious. With there flexible permissions and the remixes of fan art of prospered. 

I'm reminded that our licensing laws, as there fullest are full of controversy and disagreements, here's one I agree with Jimmy. Copyright, an obsolete concept, or something that may be undone by capital.

Oh my, the entire copywriting profession, being completely hackneyed, each is a vote for copyright, or a vote for the legitimising of such a system.

One of the reasons why I self-publish.

I'll continue. What I've learned from licensing that people, like libertarians, have a market fundamentalism view of that only artistic energy can be placed within the desire of making money, oh how easily measures yet naive. Also, that's not art. Not even the conversion rate an executive makes, well, that of the work's exchange value is reductive in of itself.

Work schedules, crunch culture, sigma grind set, Criminalisation/decriminalisation of sex work/anti-work, sexcess, design theories and praxis, those are all the things a craftsman can discuss that don't need licence. Pro-bono and other charity projects are always there that can be done without permission.

Including the ontology of licence. Along with the witherist position. The licensing industry complex, yeash. Sustainability being a trained skill again.

( Oh btw, since capital is going to disintegrate licences due to jingling keys with it's David Foster wallace Infinite Jest that can be played on doomscroll is qualitatively different from establishing a community that prioritize mutualism and equitable, resource redistribution of the co-operatives will always be more beneficial. No from the reactionary populism this big companies have. )

Here's a 15 video by Shiddy kickflips with cussing, I need to document it here in case you missed it.

Next time! Couch Gregor will look within Comfy UI, the stuff coco was made from. 🛋🔎

Artfight platform Ruminations to license reductionism

Previously, Zei has retreated from art fight due to restrictions and, copyright apparently, or repetitive usage within boss fights. He had to remove it due to stresses now.

Oh, silly platforms, middlemen and the rent-seekers. Is this the case? What is this, is this the amount of ways that are made and that it's exposure again.

Exposure builds credibility (be it commercially), right? Or that's how it works through the public. This is the age within the Internet where there's infinity and free, what is there to license any more? Should we license? Paywall? Rhetorically, I answer here.

This was designed for one on one communications or small, viable audiences; the internet like a place like this.

Work means showing up on demand, in others terms and hitting specifications, a hobby is something one does to entertain oneself, like the YouTube poops. The hobby economy will still continue regardless, with new sites cropping up. Along with the shelf space like that.

Yet this is for the satisfaction of paying within one's own work forward, with minimal editing and interaction. That's supposed to be an art trade, some hours a day, drawing and done. Yet I can understand there are other commitments and bigger projects others could do.

Back to the struggle/share duality again, another choice to make. Can't argue with the free hugs guy, I'm a free hugs guy who does not give away licensed hugs.

(Going through the rationales)

It's non-profit and could be part of other education, so I'll give it that. The caterer gets front-page access, yet there's merely more braggability of doing other gift work somewhere else. Still that front-page space with a support to provide for the platform, the proprietary platform that I'm meant to entertain again.

Anime burnout

Aokaimaidu got me these sources, thought I'd add my comments.

Kuroshi and licensors. Along with production committees, there's going to have to be a line somewhere where creative labour forces will have to stop jumping through hoops and licensing loopholes with that industry complex.

Death by overworking with comic 'professional' that being a euphemism here since there are overworked comicer that have this Stockholm syndrome with the profit motive. Like being rented mules with others like other rented mules, like the previous.

Or is the standard where love cannot persevere amongst hateful working conditions? Best to be separate from all that ruckus.

Sony has consolidated the licensing, to have to keep in mind.

Licensing politics, even entertainment can't especape form sone/disney/nintendo when it comes to that.