What's one Kyro's box? Part 2

Two Recommendations as filler.

Polemics?? Governance? Even that liberal Seth has takes on it??
 
Accurate takes on Marxist Leninist governments that take the history seriously?

Collage?

What's on Theos?

Arguments for the pressupostionalism of god?? Nagel's Contingent and arbitrariness. 3 hours for those who have blessed to share it.

Shadow Libraries Save em'

-

Look at those CLOWNS anti-ai wash academia most communist concept!

 Here's a link to the >> Shadow library Book << as you're reading. A call to protect the commons with 

This is the life, of our shared pool of knowledge in the commons to us.

Yet so to radicalisation (For all the wrong reason) are made to make sure it goes away by those who go I'm just doing my job to relatable/symbolic capital.

Radical Polarization, principled within a stereotype of a cartoon villain taking all art, regardless of the socioeconomic complexity. Along with the government, that's a matter beyond my comprehension of the way, with its interactions with copyright in Poland and the manner of environment. How decentralized platforms happen to work with regulation with the wall of shame, to the means of holding it with account to our civil autonomy. 

Now, we get to see that even with those who do and it's a long 4 day read.

The craft of natural sciences and the social, It's a prideful thing to be proud of.

Avoid digging those presupposition holes

 Be careful who you work for, that's what you give labour too. Or, the moral desert

Be careful who you believe as a means of coherence, that's what a presupposition is.

An opinion of prescriptive judgment, of all prescriptions and then the descriptive.

Intellectualism, well, it's a stuff you ask a scholar for. Seth Godins Liberal ramblings.

Ode to the Meme time

Abstract expressionist bwomph.

 Memeplexs

One thing social media has done, which is nice. Is memes.

The only idea and concept that Richard Dawkins every contributed to our culture, with communal expressions that lead to heuristics of better understanding of civilisation, or more heuristics.

Other ideas, such a study of meme, and the meme machine are better books on this phomonoa imo.

Quibbles, Jreg endorsement, already he may have normalised bad treatments.

Too much glazing of Richard Dawkins, the only one which I liked of the four horseman of the atheism was Daniel Dennet.

Now share along, those transcendent of the Draconian IP laws, spread away and fall through the ideas of all the ways into the art of collage and in the see of the cyberspace.

Swoosh!

Letter of disinterest of Beepity Boop Wars

gambleor said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that Thunderf00t and Pat Condell happen to hold positions which broad brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny."

Principle, as radical ideas that have questionable roots and Polemics.

I apply it to this situation. Similar to the baseless polarizations and the increased amounts of dead-end intellectualisms. They should have bombed a data centre already, yet they are complaining on microblogging. It's

Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them. They are ultimately a non-event.

Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.

Listening and having my beliefs challenged, not by debate, yet by hearing those not of the main-road.

The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started the all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within 

Tesla and Nfts have been telling you of such wild dismissals, and I can read to that and draw it into info and into knowledge. If you've been wilfully misinformed, they are either hustlers or a bad actor. Hustler, there's only so much time to get the information that's sensible, that's not some BuzzFeed article.

Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls Baby Leftism for lack of a better term, (I call it Wilfully misinformed) Has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.

Yes, that's why I've had to moderate my stance on this, focus on broad brushing polemics provided by the perverse incentives of direct response (Things getting more outrageous than they already get)

This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:

• . Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient, It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out.
• Water has been refuted, repeatedly, here we are. Not valid.
• Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
•  Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class petit boug) Yet here we are.
•  Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels Group? weird centrist oppourtunists like Ed Zotron, hello?)
  
  Is this yet another reach via angry straight white men, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism!
  
  
• Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
• . Automation is a matter of capital and in regard to freelancers and firms. Too much epistemic certainty from those who aren't epistemic experts.
• The clanker slur 'discourse' has yet become ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
  
  When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
  
  The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
  
  Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
  
  They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.

Cussy nsfw rant incoming. Befor all of this started, 11 years ago. It's going towards the same trajectory. The bubble on social media is so isolated and that preponderance of response rates aren't like that. Not even a criminologist, there, shooting themselves in the foot.

I must return to the rant since of the small scale bubble of social media ain't reflective of activism at large, since the thing ain't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaption, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.

We will have to foundherently adapt to this epistemic tech, for no epistemological is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaption we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. This second order effects.

So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with properity drm? Misrabalist nihilists with the class action lawsuit, ones of blind faith

When they bring it like this.
Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul Supporters, and Mens right activists, that's my prediction.

If boycotts look like this, then it's going to yet another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.

I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right

Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it.

Peace ✌🛋

When Propriety DRM hits, Moral panic washing.

I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.

... This nsfw gag

Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers. 

Deontological application? If a cost that would not even work? <Article of a chief ecomonist btw.

No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?

Reading this free open university course of criminology

Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?

Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.

(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)

Moral entrepreneur is such a good term 🛋️💭

Reassembled/reinstatement rather than Replaced

 As I try to have an opinion (no opinions allowed on Twitter, artist) of being reassembled rather than replaced.

Two Studys, One of the evidence on Reinstatement. Along with a working paper on Robots and firms I've read. So do entertain better ones before looking at microbloggers and anger there.

(That's the physicalism's way of testing, from literature to textbook. Learned that from bodybuilding.)

Alternative to the populist one that worlds going to end, merely because that elite class, ( Demographically Christian white men in the west, capacity qua capacity) going to control slightly less of it. With its token supporters.

That's one of my theories with labour markets being made anew, deproffesionalize and professionalizing of our cycle.

Here's a materialist/ideology interpretation of the AI with structuralism. As I learn the tenets to apply to my method of understanding the world of qualitive differences. Here's an hour of a book I'm getting. B-B-Bonus video

Plopyright hate post by Bintendo

Hopefully nobody proselytizes with the doctrinaires. All the erotica about is vastly superior to that Business model. Welp,

Worst thing about copyright is reducing all ideologies of art into transacting a monopoly to a publisher, that's not art. That outcome ain't the top of the algorithm of our attention of all the hits (Although I do get it, otherwise it's the fire hose kind of situation.)

Gift economies (that don't exist.) Pro bono work (Professional stuff) and Alternative means of models that don't mean being subservient to reactionary capital. Copyright is the biggest defence of monopoly, so it's necessary that is hides behind it.

Some Bluesky posts I've been collecting..

Retweet
‪@wwahammy.com‬· 3mo
Copyright is the most anti-worker invention ever. It allows companies to demand writers do free work and then decide after the fact whether they want to pay for it.
Lawyer>
‪Meredith Rose‬ ‪@mrose.ink‬· 3mo
COPYRIGHT IS NOT LABOR PROTECTION COPYRIGHT HAS BEEN ABSOLUTE DOG**** AS LABOR PROTECTION FOR THE LAST 400 YEARS PASS LABOR LAWS STOP ASKING COPYRIGHT TO FIX THE WORLD

Oh well, With a Fandom is that it's licensing malpractices with charity and other events, it's not something I'd like to flirt with. This video may sum it up, yet there's the amount of distrust to add to my reason of why am I not a gamer.

There's a continued insistence to enjoy toys and the pleasure principle.

Welp

https://www.suedbynintendo.com/ for all the litigious malpractices

This is what monopoly without anti-trust does to you folks, litigious malpractice.

This has been going for years with such a controversy. From the 1970's of the demonology of copyright. Twenty page document of lectures of the thoughts.

Richard Williams Disagreement

 "With life drawing, there comes the gradual and fundamental improvement of one's work."

Sadly, that's not how it happens within the marginal cost within the reach of publishers and social media publishing.

Lottery statistics. Numeric
ally, going at random. Random with no-reason. No power scaling of craft, random.

Welp, time for another post.

Learning the Beep boopitys in academic circles

Beep Boop = Ai For any savvy reader out there, when I talk about it, within my microbloggers, I'm talking about it. I've to keep it low in case random aggro doomers come and nibble at

Since, its become a standstill of recursive doomerist. Ignore the news-headliners of ai being Jailbroken and come with me with my sources on knowing the beepity boopits.

I've mentioned The Last Invention, yet what about Machine Learning street talk?

Lump of cognition fallacy with the latest one here though, even though I enjoyed the definition of intelligence with less is more (Which is supposed to be a paradox btw.)

There, articulating theory's that better there, even the sceptics I felt like I learned something with intelligence being defined right now. Come and seek the new answers with a niche audience of about a bunch of llm/diffusion and creativity that ain't reflective within the bubble of social media.

Because it's ultimately, and most fundamentally inconsequential, those who beg for propriety drm and infinity of copyright trolls.

Guess I'm stuck in the middle again.

Mechanical optimism Dario Amodei, along with Doomerism examined

  Dario Amodei seems to be sick of the doomers, I am too.

Guess with AI visions, I'll leave with a positive note. Machines o
f loving grace

That's the positive aspects of ai. Biological pathogens being sorted along with the ways of lays being rigorously analysed, not seen and a foundation within discourse, only to test theories.

Really gives me hope, even though it's coming through anthropomorphic, well, I can converse now with capital. Big does not necessarily mean bad if it's governed well. We all can't be noble savages.

Greater wrong has written by Doomerism and it's shades, time for emoooooo.

I'm a little ennui frankly, myself. Yet these layers of the onions are the self-described doomers.

Yet the idea of robot overlords getting bored as I skimmed through my the mathematics as entertainment made me interested, yet that tells something more about me than. It's by @jdp.extropian.net What about this, and Intermingling with the LLM engineers now because why not, This is what happens when a journalist does takes and even citizen journalisms.

Can't broad brush all believers at this rate.

Enjoy those links in the doomer examinations, because I'm not clicking em, to confess.

Oh, Fresh Episode of The last invention is here. I'll be putting these under the Beep_boop to show how much editorials I've done on AI. Clambering for certainty with opinions to how to find peace of mind.

I mean, bonus lecture at the risks and assessments of the risks, even the one I've done with psychosis one.

strong vs nuanced opinion paytoilets

Everybody has one, everybody. Can take a dump despite the more academic, more rigorous approaches within this wild ways.

Pay toilet, was the vulgar expression by Harlan Ellison, used to express the spirit of western democracy.

Yes, everybody can do an essay  everybody can do porn, everybody can do a scat. It's what we signed up for. With content moderation being the thing, we govern each other.

So this self-governance is sacred, that's the thing with deontology and rights. Or as the autonomy of the previous days I was taught.

The discreet ones do it at the edges of acceptability. How these resolve of the provocateurs and polemists with the coexistence.

The strong ones draw lines in the sand, in the plane of axiology.

Propaganda is education/from our attention merchants of sex.

 Wow, Formalised instruction one keeps personal, yet unless it's entertainment under the legalese of fiction, there's a more direct approach.

Welp, Since essays are propaganda much like school, here's one on education within the west.

Sex workers (Prostitution) as I agree with most of what this video is on about. Thanks for the public service, and even if the opinions don't align, I know I can endorse the views like this.

Is this what they mean by world W***** three with what Chuck Palunuik wrote with pornagraphers? Like me being on the lower run of the whorearchy with its on social dynamics at play of all the way people seem to not pay attention to this blog, consumer my porn then go about their business? With that legeles of no politics, wanting only entertainment?

Is that it?

Well, rhetorically of course, there's the way I have to address sexcess of those who are discreet about what they enjoy, with their kinks that I have to address, it's like this wild west that I'm going to live in will have to see how others are paying attention.

It's like those kink accounts that post only porn to a marketing efficiency standpoint, yet I'm not optimised, I can't fit in a mold, being an intellectual with many foundherent believes ain't out of his Cascoon yet of discovering that I'm a freak who like with my Marxism.

Oh well, you follow doctrines, your article, and you're done.

W*****-Archy

Sexcess

Sexcess, that people only value me for my sexual performance. (If you ab-test a website enough, it will turn into a porn site.)

There, uncensored the word porn now, I'm done.

I'll keep track of Intellectexual, she may have some ignorant assumptions regarding with how deep I am in the beep boops, yet it will all pass.

essaykin, Our interal yearning for heuristics

No, I won't elaborate on this book reading meme. From Sharonk. Haven't got it.

With our linguistics, Noam Chomsky did his best to acknowledge an internal organising of our labour mechanisms. Patterns into simple and complex ones.

As a general rule, direct response is action. It pierces the consciousness with its heading.

To the tiniest of snippets of knowledge, to the biggest, all within a maxim of wisdom, to the incursion and the curious that's the whole shtick.

Mini snippets! Mini insight

Cartesian Graph questions

 

What if none of this makes any sense?

No control to this in regard to winning any social media lottery.

Reading Liberal theory and all ideological presumptions fixated with brute and simple by design.

Politics is a lot more complicated than a Cartesian graph, there's a Marxist/economics refutation, there's the anarchist refutation, then there's those who do it bully centrists.

Which, what are you going to do?

Then it's used for branding exercise, position, Other than the lottery of the social media.

Such a manner of label and self-actualization, self-determination. Here we have where through the cross, This is where the views of our democracy of many lies.

Peter Coffin on licensing, character examination

So I'm going to dive into a excommunicated character. Time to commentary time with my impressions.

Yes, I'm posting this. IDC if you disagree, and you see this as an endorsement. Cussy things asides with all the amounts. Here's he goes with the labour theory of value. 

As with gatekeeping, well, better to gatekeep creative commons rather than copyright doctrinaire. Each vote of that only legitimises the system. (That's an anarchist saying)

I've had to my commentary with Hbomberguy and Innuendo, We may have had differences with the movie such as c*ties with me agreeing with feminists Podcast episode, that's here and there.

Oh and the content, I've simmered on that. It's capitalisms perverse incentives and race to the bottom, really. Any sociological, foundherent analysis yet nobody is calling the obvious thing out to Hbomberguy.

Wow, he's got excommunicated by the copyright doctrinaires! Woopsy. Going to abstain my judgement of the J. K. Rowling thing. Guess he's right to call out the harassment campaign of the liberal apologists of certain issues now left-coded.

(Even when then, Innuendo's This is Phil Fish video has passed in the past. He's doing presentations of thought terminating clichés now. Strongly Agree.)

Commentary channels with this Though over the word content means there's still some hope, along with left unity never being a thing since it's harder to accomplish, that's a good thing. Welp, with my own opinion of the content/format distinction being a non-sequitur.

It's gone south, though, along with Stephanie.

What happens with those full of social media capital of Symbolism and relatability do now? Get Sad and leave, or mad and try to consolidate and control. Have to agree with that.
Yeah, Opinion has lowered.

Oh yeah, I've discovered his position on Ukraine for the moment, and I support their right to self-determination. Frantz Fanon Self-determination. 

Agreement

Gen AI and propriety copyright

Fanboyish elitism

Understanding Sociology/neoliberal, and consumerism is not worker.

Prosumerism

The pontifications of the term content is a mindless popularity contest
Malthusian Documentary one is strong.

Disagree

Certain geopolitical issues. (Maybe here and there though, Idk Already here and there.) Third campism.

References analogic reasoning to South Park, they are inconsistent to libertarian. Pot stirring provocateurs with their polemists, yet he's using them in a consistent.
(That Took my jerbs gag always gets me.) (Post-edit Couch Gregor)

My emptiness that he may of not read Susan Hacks Foundherentism.

Gatekeeping, I'm suspecting more of moral panic and status roles of others on Twitter and all that pearl clutching.

If I gave a completely arbitrary game review score 7/10 for this self publisher. I may even seek out his book.

Okay, As Bonus on december edit he called out the latest video by Drew here ai being profitable being a capitalist mindset, he's still blogging it.

No politics = legelese recursive product of Governance

I'll steel man this then give a balanced take. On such a unbinding, unenforced legalese. Non state sanctioned.

In the void of the internet, there is no duty, no service, the long tail of distribution. From the pundit pot stirrers, to the Kardashians trying to look their concept of cute. Yet, social media is sold to the advertisers or the society of subscriptions. Vendors, serviceability.

It shows that this could be an entertainer, not a lecturer of governance, education, journalism, religion . Focusing on televisual rather than typographic expression; showmanship.

Since fiction is the legalese used for state protection for specific expression, not natural law.

This may suspend proselytisation and ideological presumptions of the viewer. All being part of a campaign.

So no controversy, politics imply two states at tension'n conflict. Along with fictional drama being within the subject. That's a charitable view. Keeping one's head down from the pot-stirring provocateur.

However, it's like a butler saying "It's not my job to have an opinion" it does bring questions, since it is not natural law anyhow.

I cannot tell the intentions of such an entertainment-ese layer. Since Interpretation and scrutiny of the media is used to help provide meaning. All the ideological presumptions will be guessed and speculated on, along with whether it being direct like satire or propaganda.

Whatever we reach and whatever we think. (Such as the clock metaphor, clock is the measurements of matter, the sociology of goals to tell the time.)

Right reasons, wrong reasons, undefined! Wow. Interpretation can matter.

I think of this writer snippet alot.

Things I agree/disagree of Stephanie: Moving on.

Interest wanes and falls

Because i'm not a gamer! ohh, maybe i'll snoop in your podcast and five years. I'm a freelance contract worker who happens to do

I agree with him with licensing here along up until AI which I'm not sure he's clarified about. I'm sure he's mislead. Legitmate fears, well, enjoy a lot of dildos and adult themes in this.
(Dildo references), Lot's of sex toys

I can't find myself enjoying 95% cases of licence. Wish it was consistent.

Replace EA with 'Disney' and replace customers with Independent artists. Class analysis and dialectical materialism.

Despite my disagreements, I did enjoy his video on Bogwarts. All of them. Well, Even Peter Coffin has words on that.

It goes south with her reaction to the AI thought, Peter Coffin, Alexander Avile, Sunny'm Cheax, Andy Masley have responded better.

Now I'll see if I can make with Peter Coffin, being the citizen investigator I will have to see his own way with the ai. Oh She's wrong on NFTS too. So, I must do my bid adieu as a customer and not follow.

Getting too moral panicky.

Gotcha Tribunals

 Thinking about Statecraft, Governance, and yes, Politics. Evaluating what Set thought.

Seth has written about it. Guess he's a liberal.

Tribalism, other than the colonial implications. Has its own sparring of power.

Or what they say about informal groups. Status and governance. 

Why is everybody thinking everything a trial to declare verdict on microbloggers?

Everything a villain? Everything a verdict. Complete in curiosity across with the microblogging mind, the amount of discourse is the take it in an amount, time to vary the way.

I'm seeing the reliance of willing misinformed opinions within the west. Relying on Ayn Rand, and now there are more pundits than every trying to out-do each other. Guess this is why we still have the academics.

As a general rule, don't bother if it takes a bibliography, since you got to stay in sync with oneself.

An Examination of L0ddism

 They did not have the insight. It does not deal with our desire for modernism. People cannot wrestle with the idea that there are times when, even with the crisis theory provided my Marx, they're still our tools and still another day.

I'll have to get out of this baby leftist mindset and see that how others cannot get their education from streamers and microbloggers. I can't learn from a Laggard, they can't be reached. So to stay in sync with myself.

First volume of capital I've tried to read. Try and get a correct interpretation, yet with this postmodern quote-mining wave of hyperreality. I'll go with this one.

Some retweets.

 ‪@segyges.bsky.social‬ from this thread

"the artisans are behaving like politically destructive rent-seekers and trying to reduce automation instead of seeking meaningful political change concerning ownership of capital and allocation of resources" is also orthodox marxist

the entire idea of fixed capital is that workers individually do not necessarily own the means of production; like, whether or not they morally should own their output, they do not, that is not how the thing works, and the social arrangement for large factories makes it complex to even try to do

-

i do think however that marx is correct on the basic points of

1) automation is good

2) luddism is bad

3) the problem is who controls the automation, and the wealth created by it, and who gets left out

4) the solution ultimately has to be the power of the state"

‪@bitesu.kawaii.social‬
"the luddites were not pro workers rights they were not a labor movement they were artisans and workshop owners and guild members who were financially threatened by industry because factories could produce textiles far cheaper than their poorly paid apprentices stop with this ahistorical nonsense

they were reactionaries who were opposed to progress because their own private enterprises were outcompeted by a new mode of production. "pro workers rights" like they weren't all guild artisans who had their own sweatshops where apprentices did all of the work
please read some actual theory and actual history for gods sakes or you're going to fall back into the trap of carrying water for petit bourgeois reactionaries impeding progress. not a single marxist with two brain cells to rub together is going to say "we have to go back before capitalism " cause that's the whole point!! new modes of production and new modes of social organization pave the way forward to newer yet modes of production and organization, some of which can even facilitate socialism (like industrial modes of organization. for example)"

(Oh and Ned Ludd ain't real, Brian Merchant is doing revisionist history.)

So Industrial mode of production =/= Artisinal Mode of production. That's the matter of the modernisation that we will do, moving forward. Reading with literature and the textbook

So the answer is.

NAY 👎🛋! Reject this Petit bougiese impulse and show sympathy to the industrial/working class who can't afford the artisanal modes of production

Along with the pull of plopyright shifts us to atomised alienation, resist the pulse! Gift economies, Pro bono, Creative commons licensing as alternatives.

Support Ghostwork and Turkpoticon and ignore the clown dogmatism at microbloggers.

They're basically going to go nowhere, like selfish Ayn Ryandists, and Male supremacist movement that happened within 2016 and then disappeared into obscurity. Ron Paul Supporters too! - It all comes around.

I don't even identify as a Marxist doctrinaire given how diverse my thought is with sociology'n all economical analytic thought, the way the west with it's movement are silly.

I will read more literature and textbooks on automation, yet we must shift our automation to replacement to reassembling, revolting along with the anti-trust of monopoly.

I Shall end with a quote from the Lorax

The Lorax

"What do you want? Shut down the factories? Make the workers lose all their jobs?"
"You have your point, Yet I don't know the answer" ~ Dr Suess, Despite my many disagreements with him. What an interesting paradox of handling our growth of our society, hmm?