Diffusion model ethics to Broad brush

I investigate into the lands of the beep boops.

Previously on Couch Gregor's ai editorals. Since I'm dissatisfied with all the editorials, I made my own.

Looking at the coco workflow, there's the usage of noding and shaders here like it's used within blender, with 3d models.

Huh, according to the questionable lawsuits there n has been ethical questions in regard to this, I've had to check what this will do for independents.

Looks like it will have to relax and into noding, with minimal text-to-prompt speech, I'm afraid such a matter will move towards no copyright infringement. The environmental concerns along with the labour is another matter.

I can still see some inconsistency here and there, i think it will.

The only answer to this will be to do another art piece.

Since copyright licensing laws aren't going to stop this ( Disney has been developing its out diffusion models for to replace to concept artists.. ) Such a matter that copyright infringement it out of existence, it's going move into ethical questions with regard to its use and not contingent on commercial publishing and industry.

Licensing politics! Yeesh. Have they slapped me with a copyright infringement from drawing an Aggron as a pin-up, perish the thought. I'm merely a content producer to them anyhow.

This book is on my audiobook list in terms of essays. So many coming out these days. Got the audiobook.

 With the rise of deepfakes will continue to occur, along with the 

The age of scepticism is going to get more muddy. Herschel Gordon Lewis had a point with direct response rates

Disinformation campaign first, funding latter.

Going to have to boost this as such tech evolves, Fox Key did make a post that this will continue since films are the most labour-intensive and expensive forms that we take for granted. Including videogames, and such a licensing that will only move it underground, along with managing.

I'm not sure if we can out-license of with this will combine to some odd concoctions, I don't like this I.P loving people, (Even though I can imagine a system of resource redistribution not contingent on it, merely like how qualitative differences between a restaurant and a soup kitchen works. Does that make me a anarchist? Oh, well. )

It's not that the lowest common denominator word of content means the worst and the best. Bill Gates definition versus Martha McLuhan definition.

Welp, I'll have to keep track as these things unfold, and soul-searching will occur. This broad brush will see more erm, cases, so to speak. Both Industrialists and the silicon will be watched.

Direct/Distract News

 A dichotomy between distract and distract.

Yet with all this time, and there's the way the ideas are made. With it that can let somebody learn and aid with new foundherentism, within the mesh of epistemology. Rewritten when things don't fit within the experiential clues, then made.

This is expanding on the theory by Susan Haack, yet theories are the made into praxis and the back into it again. Am I embellishing or growing it? Well, since it's a movement away from religious fundamentalist ontology of religious belief. Guess that's the advantage of agreeing with one thing, and disagreeing with another.

Perfection ain't determined by any editor because there aren't any here. For better or for worse.

Yet news? Anybody can be one now. (Uh oh). Does it direct one's intent or distract it?

Professional attention p-p-premotion!

 Ludologically, I can't agree with the behaviourism of Gerwinder, with my own disagreement. Simple because sociologists have more appealing theories of social development.

If you haven't already, I'm still going through the ideation of a previous Neverpost, of hypersexual hentai and the post-platform. Or how these stages stick and go.

Oh, how the hierarchy commodification of power scaling and the affiliation of a community'n charity never go away.

Oneirataxia / Hyperreality

Metamodernism time! The literary kind, not the self-defeating financial kind.

 Fantasy and reality. Non-reflective of the person creating such a fetish, yet the time, it comes out.

Within our own realms of design where our own perception, we are entering a realm where art is hostile to entertaining the perceived, yet through the repulsion becomes the paradoxical attraction, for attraction cannot be the positive value being made, so right today, that's with the negative, with its scepticism brings an compulsion.

36 essay on a self-referential movie. Funny Games. Which is an attempt to bring opposition of meaning into the mix of our own perceptions, along with ending within a pretentious ending that cannot be called slop. Anybody who's read scriptwriting 101 will be getting the cues right now of who's being signalled, with this being the in-joke.

We are stuck within our own entertainment. On how YouTube and xwitter being on the downside of ad money and not subscription services.

Slippery slopes, or not.

Irony and sincerity, such a distinction. Irony poisoned is sincerity masquerading as irony.

Anti-art and anti-business/Questionable cases

 Previously on Couch Gregor's journalistic notes on Gen AI.

Clickbait! Clickbait and Grifts all around like we are in the trenches! It's time to hide and try to make sense of it.

This attempts to clear some of the fog, despite certain talking points being made.
This one is alright, even if it attempts to separate predictive AI for social media and including generative AI. It claims most of predictive AI on social media hit prediction is bunk and that alot of the scams there are where the snake oil is.

Yet is goes into why it uses text to speech long with other certain evolving tech for clarity.

3:10 hour of the most charitable understanding, along with certain questionable cases that are misrepresenting, I'm not acting as a proxy for Alex Avile.

This is the most accurate take, despite the postmodernism (which I don't like. Foucalt, grr ) Now, it does read between the lines on that Case while happening to not simplify something. It's simply not that simple with such cases like that. Oh, some ideas are not contingent on the measurement of currency.

It's becoming more apparent that with our desires, that even with the efficiency argument and the environmental concerns beginning to surface.

These are the ideas that may get me called out for being anti-business or anti-art, simple because I find a case that supports Adobe AI models and Disney's Ai Models, an indefensible inconsistency. It's why I've tried to listen to others, including the sceptics of the anti-ai. Why would you consider yourself a defender of a class with that backing?

Regardless of things, I try not to be too technological determinist about it, there will be capital and another day of work to do.

Do yourself a favour and don't read the comments, even if I did. Merely noting a Marchell Duchamp taking from Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven.

There are multiple sides to this AI debate and conflict, so I'm going to continue my essay archaeology.

Not into the postmodernism, can be ignored yet his copyright alliance ip-loving maximalism which seeks to increase displacement and artist erasure.

I'm not relating to the justifications of it all.

Yet that's not the intention of advertising, it's to repeat like a frequency till your "accountant tells you they're bored with it." Now it's more of hiding heads in the sands, and with the complexities unresolved.

Creative or 'creative' Pundits have been disappointing, to self-defeating cases, and towards to ineffective noise filters that don't work on current models, no glaze or bulls***. 

I'm going to have to leave this for more coherent words, not another quietism and heads in the sand. With the Luddites that have lost, we have to see if we can at least remain technically literate.

"watching artists advocate for stricter copyright law is insane, to me. you are wrong!

these kinds of people hijacked the whole deal. it sucks. its going to turn into "being anti-copyright law is pro-AI and anti-worker" lol"

I don't think these class interests have oversight to be representive, I'd like more critical thinking with our own ideas.

I have to agree with that sentiment, people have got there funds despite archaic laws, even though I know there are lawyers out there that are good people. We have to come to terms of it. I don't think that's it's defeatist, rather than reassessing my terms of assessment.

I may be called anti-art and anti-business, as things have been previously done. Yet, reading between the lines is something I have to do here. I don't want to live in a complete permission culture, there are always going to be conflicts.

If the confusion of permission and remix is still forever, then nothing will be accomplished.

Technically literate, the best kind. Can't wait for part 2 by Alex Avile.

(Post edit Avile proceeded to post ) Slopification has already happened when he pointed at Defen village. )

Here's my Comment.

"Thanks for this, my thoughts... Remember Elsa-Gate? There was already slop within the gaps to quote 'feed the algorithm/market', such a system of romantic individual creativity could be made, yet as such an extent of the sloppers, the masses don't care and YouTube. Almost like being in our own niche places, where the internet was designed without the intention of advertisers, the commodity fetishism of it all, there's still community to build. So is the idea of Neil Postman's amusing ourselves to death when it comes to politics, journalism, education and religion and made to be liked, aaah Dough Ruskoff, within his documentary to be liked. There was already hacknification and hierarchal relationships with the creation of our crafts. I do it myself when it came to it my own sex work. It's like everything is being illuminated, like you said. The fabric of our serviceability being natural in of itself, not so in our systems. 🛋💭"

It's not like I'm defending Elsa gate or that, it's merely how others don't pay attention to their out mechanisations provided with the financial incentives.

Such as it I don't think the Defen Village as the same as such as the other industry complex, we are seeing it more now.

(Oh, I have no intention of debating this maximalist positioning, regardless, supporting Disney/adobe copyright with their AI models is not within their interest, and not within my purview of debate. There is a growing preprosterism. The less the art enterprise looks like the free market enterprise separation from crunch culture and sigma grind sets the better. I guess some)

Let's leave these cases. Permission culture out of the aesthetics of ideas, concepts and style.

Passion Exploitation

They are writing about passion exploitation

Word, even though they may not change our thinking, there are malicious 'teachers' out there who'd think they can out-train sleep.

Beware of groups that become MLMs, Moneys into false promises, and swindles into a realm of creative industry.

Industry...

I could rant about it more and more, only to avenge by doing the more important thing, which is to learn to not work for exploiters.

Such a shame that our own manners of internal motivators can be taught bad patterns, It's only wise to not work for cruelty.

12 min video in regard to passion exploitation

Pain as a generator of creativity, I don't think it's possible. Oh, it's a better as engagement bait and a race-to-the-bottom advice advertising.

Monopsomy of sexual appeal

Thing with working in the industry. Something about the pale king was a woman who ranted about being a sex object

Or monopsony, a single seller with many buyers.

Single selling of sex to many thirsty suitors.

Objectification and power scaling, status roles and informal primacy to our culture, it does not need to be embraced. Yet that's what perception of our hierarchy and other alternatives in regard to learning are own meaning of status in our culture.

(That's not counting on objectification vices such as murder, violation of boundaries trafficking, autonomous things that are to be found in the legal institution. Sexual objectification has been discussed )

That's what they talk about when it comes to audience capture. (Editorial, politics and stuff by Gerwinder.)

Rantsona

 It will have to be Kyro.

He's not a man who cares about expressions and shouting, along with writing constructive editorials, and spending 20 hours within a circular debate.

A debate of rationalism and hijacked postmodernism, rejected meaning locking into categories of phantasms. Of bad actors serving secrets and nebulous pretensions.

What a silly, ranty warrior.

Such catharsis is physical, and the hedonic treadmill that is never satisfying, such a paradox of satisfaction will be beyond his imagination and he may be info a seductive trap, low traction response videos.

Then he'll move onto vlogging into the with, thinking of how Asheal will hit on him.

Then that post will unpredictable go viral with the tea spill community.

Fictional Savior Complex

Documentaries and non-fiction has become fiction, demarcation becoming blurry, that's a problem with no stated genre bending, shifting and braiding. All a happening of conflating entertainment with the more serious pursuits.

Is it me, yet the "It's more complicated than that, art is supposed to save us?" Or is organised direct action suppose to be made?

That's an anarchist response.

I can't go to direct action due to my disability, so I teach and editorialise instead. Being an honest hack within entertainment, because like Harlen said, the show must go on.

What with the paradox of fiction, subsists within our culture, still persists. Art aren't fully joined by the hip of entertainment product, yet when they do.

Political Quietism

Is this political hub-bub of quietism activism of entertainment, merely commercial ad-creep I wonder.

Thinking to this show vs Telling

Including the scenes, which I learned from the story grid.

why not both?  Thinking of the trove of writers on substack again.

 "Secondly, even if you are looking to “show” it’s important to remember that virtually all fiction involves both “showing” and “telling.” If some over-zealous writing teacher claims you should never tell, ignore them. You need both exposition and scene, at least in most works. The way to apply this rule is to show the most important information for your themes, story, and characters. Show us the pivotal scenes, the dramatic peaks, and the crucial plot twists. Tell us the information we might need to know, but isn’t as dramatic or thematically important. Part of this is a question of emphasis, signalling to the reader what is important, but another part is time management. Put simply: telling is typically quicker than showing. It takes less words to sum up a conversation or scene than to summarizing it. So understanding when to tell and show is a crucial aspect of controlling the pacing of any story."

Oh, well, are people afraid to make ideology and political commentary with their fiction? Well, prosumerism in the west always exist, i shan't use the non-authority of the prosumer public, they don't know.

Beware those who make a scene of prescriptive quietism.

I don't know if what I write is too controversial, or should I be controversial for the right reason? Contrarian with meaning or premeditation.

Posting this again for good fortune.

Generication;Genericide

Such a manner bridging the literary academics with the genre commercials, into the whole arena, then into elimination and recategorization.

According to brand manager, Genericide is when a good/service reaches it's indirect badging value. Or what, according to the marketer's commodification of the monopsony. Single buyer, many sellers selling that generality.

Oh, how do such a specific that it's brought to our minds when it's the individual. That's made.

That's a digression, though.

Speaking of genre and it's theories, it ain't fixed categorisation. Lincoln has written about it.

So despite the emergent genres of entertainment and art happening within the financial undercurrents, we can make it a choice to pick one that's serves our own conceptions and workflows. Oh, how money giggles in the background.

Disagreement with S**h

I hope to attempt to be constructive. I've learned what a naturalistic, contradictory character is since he writes so much of his mind, along with that. This ain't a call to harass, I don't think he's going to read this.

How does a critic, one who's worrying to keep the tradition of the Stoic 'guides of life' I've been compliment, yet now, I hope to bring amelioration to him by noting stuff that he could work on. This is what he wants, I take it.

Nobody's perfect.

• Funding Rachel Hollis next book with Author Equity, or such as a concept of trying to rehabilitate others.

• Venture/risk capital, This is a more of a systemic nitpick than anything.

• Claude and certain derisive intelligence embracements, (I'll ask a volunteer editor for beta readers.)

• General mixture of (Merely make good videos) and his thousand of rewordings of commodity fetishism.
  
  
• Despite his attempts of not advocating for advertising, he's bought advertising from facebook. Direct responders have pointed this out. Well, Altmba had bought advertising. When he comes from the advertising as a tax for a unremarkable product, he kind of hides his own short term advertising. Yet he does not since all are complex now with everything recorded in this age. All contradictions and consistency.
  
  He says anticipated, relevant and personal advertising messages are what distinguishes from spam, which he rants about. He tends to clarify, yet lapses in, yet his inconsistency may be the point without much he tries to get out of his inertia.
  
  
• General well, electorlism frameworks. ( I won't get into that any further. )
  
  
• (post edit) General exoneration of the free market as some kind of objective force, in an attempt to be separate to it (reading more economical books)
  
  Also, Tribalism ain't a thing to analytical term any more, a small observational which he merely should call informal groups.
  
  Regardless, thanks for providing a literary snapshot in modern enterprise of the Stoic life, being in business, with the free stuff It's enough to take in (with salt). I don't like rags-to-riches stories, though. By golly, does the west love its inspiration, P***.
  
  Oh well, thanks for being a cheerleader, guy of corporation.

All copywriting is parody, or caricature

Commodified and slop by definition and profession?! Say it ain't so.  The reason I study slop is I can clearly see the antithesis. The attempt to make a work of art and art work continues. What's Copywriting for? Cleaning the dishes? Oh well, own it.

All this was to attempt to make something out of a factory shop of furniture, making inspiration come from weird places.

With Song, that's it.

All propaganda is hackneyed, it has to be on the nose with the theme, simple, direct. Not clever for its own sake. So it's direct and in-your-face by design, to the point of it causing agreement or disagreement.

I don't know where this mediocractic line, you don't, yet I'm paranoid.

Avant Garde Artist to Hackneyed graphic design. Interactions of commodities and vision.

Crosswordism of epistemology: Susan Haack

Notes! 

Crosswordism, a conciliatory epistemological framework of viewing the world for out philosophy, of complete true justified belief. Yet here we are, some of here essays are good, some of them are not. Regarding Neurlanaysis and the overwriting of very within the language.

I gravitate towards Stephan Jay Gould and the mismeasure of man, along with Delusions of Gender as authority sources of Cordelia fine in regard to that. (I'll have to reread it.)

I wanna leave phrenology to the academics, I'm an artist/entertainer first.

Nobody's perfect with my wabi-sabism, So I take a bit from there, a bit from that. Now, such a visualisation of 3-dimensional epistemology is a way of reasons and clues being evidentiary experiences. Wow, she does like paradoxes, as do I within my fiction.

Well, that's ambiguity, that's a way to approach an essay or a fictional work.

Later she critiques the further industrialisation with academia and that's reflected or the orderisation and packaging of student into products that's a simple way with SAT tests, that later is the golden lining that brings with topics. Ad agencies lines of thinking that Seth Godin that has thought, or that he has to seek.

Attorneys being representation of advocacy rather than scientist being that of the pursuit of knowledge. Along with other distinctions, if you ignore thing, she provides a good framework for paradoxes and a 3-dimensional way of seeing discourse.

Trippy, man. Things for the philosophy are to be questioned, nothing is safe, from copyright and curious questions, a lot of questions, and then there's answers.

I'd recommend despite the odd bits.

Leave the term content along 🛋💥

Second Scribble attempt

Content can mean subject with specificity, yet the term itself as being become a generic dismissal. Not respecting the genre or the value-shifts within the statutory fictions provided within entertainment.

( dramatisation, not reflective. Point is to practice writing)

It's merely an amoral analytical term, not a virtue/vice!! The commercialization and industrialisation of the capitalists are to blame! Of course Patrick and Martin Scorsese are right with their literary pretensions of genre and things turning into vendor-mindsets with advertising agency ideology seeping in, they should be reaching us.

Keep it analytical of content/format, and not within a shrugging of publishing responsibility.

Well, that's not what these Platforms do with no curation, even though as 'react' genre attempts to do with it. Public relations for unaccountable practises.

Leave it to the west to associate amoral constructs with sacred/profanity. Guess what will happen with today.

I'm a cartoonist, writer and illustrator, content creator is a write-off dismissal. But hey, we are within a post-commodification and post-entertainment, so it's the best way to understand seeing these constraints.

Being disabled I can't engage and direct action, so I do this instead. Keep it in the academia, and not the ad-agencys of sloppifiers.

Bill Gates definition versus Martha McLuhan definition.

Kill you darlings/Abandoning them

Will be leaving sh***** as things happen, it's product of audience ain't worth it, even the most cynical of advertisers who wanted to increase their range of influence and brand image. Along with sales numbers.

Not connecting with that medium of info, and into another is part of the salesman trade, along with it taking the notes from the direct action notebook.

Commercial taking notes from the political handbook.

So that's why they abandon there darlings, with there puritan-oppourtunism spectrum being not complete, yet not fitting with the opportunism spectrum.

Microblogging was designed for cross-links anyhow, with no search engine optimisation being like a magical romantic movie.

So the internet shifts.

~Couch Gregor

Bells and whistle debate club

 A lot of politics on entertainment platforms have reached a standstill, obsession with debate is really the pinnacle of amusing ourselves to death. With the O'Reilly factor being the part where winning and semantics or placed over, with the flourish of the shouting over having a reconciliatory discussion.

No cooperation, no friendly competition, nothing, bells, and whistles. Why? Because it's better at pulling an audience. Yet better does not equate to good.

Entertainment and art is fiction. The same is happening with legal fictions, finances, education, journalism and all other fields, there's always a convincing argument to make it not edutainment. I say that as an edutainmentier.

Part of the mediocre series that delivered on its kickstarter, It was tool time's video on how everything still continuing. It's why that with journalism and literary ways that you can do

30 min editorial, 5 min on the Ken Ham, where ideology is made to be sold like advertising. Then the puffery tempts with the entertainment product made online. Cussy as we can write.

I'm not sure with if the ludology is made to serve the game of power scaling that has overtaken-the discourse. Where the performance of showmanship today is why I prefer to call myself an entertainer.

That's the problem of dealing with entertainment platforms 🥁 

share/struggle

“Immediately uninterested” The guy from Idea channel. Mike Rugnetta. In response to a new indie startup telling him to share cat photos. Oh dear, that's where the monopoly/monopsony. 

He has a provocative idea, what if sharing is actually struggling? With contradictions. All these posters who can't have the effort because it doesn't scale.

Only share with intention, not mindlessly with value-free neutral platforms deciding to not curate. As new social media alternatives show up, there's only going to be so much time t help with other audiences, everybody can only hold so much.

Guess times jump and we must go back to a website, owning and scribbling our words.

Back to a weebsiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiite 🛋👓☀☀☀

Fickle'n Fleeting, Deshowmantize

Stuff writing has taught, that audiences that chase the latest mass market trend are not going to step off the carousal. Writing with the limited showmanship of literature can be a humbling experience, some say it's harder to write a game than it is to program it.

All part of the process rather than the results that appear fresh of the social media, which everything is not sacred there from the vulgarisations of the internet. The amount it takes to verbalise thoughts with sucking others with jingling keys respects other literacy, which I hope to increase and illuminate, not level up. Yet shine a light.

A bit of an enlightenment and not a metric based metric, I know, we are talking soft skills here, stuff that's hard to measure. Where ideas and the enrolment matter and conceptual abstraction helps make this a testing ground.

Not like going viral and monetizing was an option today, despite other companies capitalizing off it. Well, you give what you take with those under the .com things.

Even copywriters, and certain commercial novelists, how do you deal with mass ignorance? Nobody want's to read with attention and time commoditized into content, and at this point. It's merely our keyboards verbalising our thoughts.

Childism/Adultism

What they should do?

This 1:40 essay got me thinking.

So, education and edifcation has been industrialised beyond our things, beyond intentional design of actual benefit, can our children be put to blame with how these systems are forming to our own ways. Adultism telling other to grow up, even in the event of there children's entertainment, or now an adult novelist as gone of the deep end, or well, F*****

Childish, and adultism is all constructs of properties to the engine of non-fictional ways, so that our taxonomy.