On Classifiers

Sadly, I see their use is more common now.

Peeps are paranoid about commodification; these are the algorithms and heuristics which linguistics has toppled too. And now they're checking through this. This has been checked adversarially, intuitively and counter-intuitively through a Socratic construction, with some autocomplete along with some other thoughts.

Pangram and others don't work. Or the self-abnegation of personal responsibility. Shall I quote? With that

Anyhow, here are two articles on why they are not to be trusted. Oh yeah, did I tell you the classifiers don't work in and of themselves? Well, you are the product. More on the math here.

Wow, look at that math.

Including a linguistic lesson on negative construction.

“It's not X. It's why” is a linguistic construction, more specifically, a “contrastive negation followed by a corrective assertion.” It's part of a rich “grammatical context for negated restrictives in English.” Olli O. Silvennoinen wrote an entire doctoral dissertation of 131 pages on contrastive negation.

Since this is continue with Sam Illingsworth's notes, the bias of these.

"Even a perfect detector would be the wrong tool


Now grant the impossible. Imagine a detector that worked flawlessly tomorrow.

I would still argue against it, for a reason that has nothing to do with accuracy.

The moment you put a detector between a teacher and a student, you change what a teacher is. You turn an educator into a police officer. The work of teaching is to be a co-creator of knowledge alongside the student, beside them while they struggle toward understanding. A detector makes suspicion the default setting. Every essay arrives presumed guilty.

That is not the job I signed up for. I did not become an educator to run my students’ words through a lie detector and wait for a number.

The evidence backs the instinct. I read every public UK university AI policy I could find, 96 of them, for a HEPI policy note this year. On a close reading of a sample, the language of education sat over an architecture of detection and surveillance. And two in five universities had no public AI policy at all. The machinery of policing arrived before the conversation about learning had even started.

You cannot police a student into learning. Detection keeps asking teachers to try."

(Off Tangent, he does try the cult thing; that's a fandom thing, though. It's my opinion.)

So, what do we do? Trust, trust that it is. (I wonder how much that paradox catches on)

In search for the iconclastic sociologist

'Speaking truth to power' With this brought to by view.

"Speaking truth to power" I knew the state ain't going to go away, individuals, institutions (firms non-profit) and government.

Anti-woke time of a limited supply, be it cognition of material resources can't at time be held, they may be shared.

Epistemic scaling does not comply to the bandwagon. Im afraid. Not all things can be funneled with the limited discovery of intelligence as "power"

This has lead into academic industrialisation and it's complex that leads into the furtherment of the publish-or-perish mindset,  To quote him. He's another former Marxist.

This was this sociologist's view, btw. Is he calling others anti-social?

Yet such a polemic of epistemology scrutiny is a thing that drives such I thing that I'm having to grapple with reading others, even with other's of ideas/concepts are being a free-for-all with the social sciences being free.

The neverending spectacle of transactionalism

This is what I talk about: when commodity relations own conscious awareness, it becomes apparent. Seth tells me to see it, and with the way to see these forces to predict with this entitlement of profit with the way communities form, also Fudge the MRA has been a dead head, yet all dead ends rest within anti-intellectualism.

Ivory tower to the Main road

Plot to spectacle since Aristotle.

Buying in or selling out
Quiet to load

Intention (noesis) to Randomness noise

Coherent to incoherent.

Serious to Play
Alienate to condescend

We live in the totality of the spectacle; there's not escaping it. Either we embrace the media of our entertainment in its many iterations of it's infinity, or we log off entirely. Or embrace with Dejourment. Of the tautology of the spectacle. It's circular reasoning, we will have to wrestly. Lean in become a generic hack, lean out become an anti-social elitist weirdo.

So thank you, industry, for making me see this.

So, with the macro, meso, and micro scales, do we deal with it? To see it. Of the Labour theory of value.

No winning with the leaning. We are overdominated by it already.

Thanks Deboard.

Reflection on knowledge rant

The Gish gallop, of the spectacle, and the reverse gish gallop.

Yet now, with all these moralisations and the elitism and the ideas with

it now, it's become apparent that I've made a professional risk. Not like Beep_boop took my job, or that I had one.

I did it because it was fun, this ain't going to get any points. Yet the 'left' and critcal theory. Of a polemic that drives an epistemological scrutiny. Social media overlapping it. I don't want to take any of it back.

This revised ranty essay along with it's reading list on the AI denial cottage industry. Is exhausting, commodities of denial, and other ways that lead to believe. That it's a thing that I have to let the crud happen. Let the crud hit the fan as I must attend other duties.

Yet America's factionalism loves its teams and gish gallops, and I'm done.

Can still not stop editing it. By this time, this post, though, I'll be done and continuing with my artistic endeavours.

The feeling when they're not ready for the amount of sociological research

I've done can't be comprehended into a single dunk tweet, and I dare not

interrupt the anger within micro blogs.

It's merely too BIG i can't fit it in, such aliteral mobs
harrasmenet to handle such a complexity.

Reflecting on this, can only say it was worth it. It's the most iconclastic thing I've

ever done, and it's spirit of Harlen Ellison's rant within his Glass Teat.

He's gone now.

ah, Symbolic capital, and the structural things

are reversed now, as 1Dime points out.

That now I'm apathetic of, with that case since the divide is the ethics with all that.

It is trying to put out a fire of bad ideas before it's too late, as it goes with the way of vaccine denial. Along with other bad ideas that have spread like wildfire.

Yet wildfires are wildfires. Criticism becomes commodified and incentivised

by the perverse incentives of online media, and there you are, forever.

40+ rewrites and illustrations of doodle-core and my other more serious expression.

It's an attempt to apply serious sociology to it all with all that I know from bad historiography, and with Althusserian sociology, I've been trying to make it out.

It's so exhausting. Is this what white-collar work feels like? Is this what working in an office feels like? I'm so tired from trying to catch up with the Americas' day and night work as I'm drawn towards its spectacle.

This is my alternative opinion of you as a citizen to bring in thought to rewrite.

Roleplaying as a couch golem – OF COURSE. I'm obsessed with AI effects, the miserablist/doomer/boomer and the industries intertwined outside them. I'm going to have to go rogue.

Since it's not a scam and it's a logic that's made me annoyed that I have to deal with the pestering insufferability of bsky discourse I've tried to avoid, I'm glad I'm out.

Wanted to do something different from porn, as they say. 

Thank you for all your understanding.

Yes Seth, you do know it.

Done. (until it's adapted away from the micro blog

discourse.)

Oh no, I did'nt use beep boop for that

 I merely expressed deontic relational intelligence.

Real good ai btw despite my vigourous

research. I'll reach out. Even as goals may not align.

Bonus. This could be for the epilogue.

This article, even with such non-trusted people in state positions, tends to make me reflect.

Yeah

"It’s both intellectually and morally thin. But it’s also unawarely hypocritical. That’s because, at its root, this anti-tech discourse is ironically anti-human. It frames us as the machines. We’re positioned as passive victims of digital services and the devices they’re served through in ways that discount our capacity for agency, intentionality and responsibility. It’s insulting because we’re deemed to be morons by default, incapable of reforming our habits."

"Phones “make” us distracted. AI “makes” us lazy. Algorithms “make” us tribal. Social media “makes” us narcissistic

It’s a cheap and lazy story, though, which is why it works. Where’s the immediate reward in encouraging things like self-discipline, intention, healthy adaptation, self-awareness, anxiety culture, negative social norms and personal responsibility."

A Hearty Mortem response to attempting to make style trade dress.

NO.

I must recover from the trauma of preposterousness.

Peter Coffin lose all bargaining leverage under proprietary drm.

aah

ahh

all those fanartists, satires, journalists, gone!

ah

it's over now.

maybe in the dank depths like those anita content farms

The phyrric victory of b_Ep boop inquisitions

There are the silly billionaires, and then the shovel salesman shows up. Somebody hires a 'real' artist based on direct response and preponderance bandwagoning, and what if they in the backstage use it too?

This is too end's justify means, whatever means necessary to extinguish a flame that's too late. Or at least for the microblogging-minded circles.

Well, not without authoritarian preporitary drm backfiring, and with that, the ones who hate the memplex of this debate, then it happens again. Tautology, keep the tautology going. Not moving on, not getting over it.

Policing invisible lines of the idea/expression of a monist way towards a way that's become the dominant ideology to try to feed the prosumer zeitgeist.

They're doxing, well, this all seems like quite the spectacle, to find a Disney villain and then attack that. Then march on with another.

I try not to give it power by paying attention.

Oh, laawrd, they're coming. Jaw Westernberg

Rachel Morton calls this out. Too, even with this situation of the lucifer effect, Not all physiological theories can be made. It's called to the ideal.. the ideal of the spectacle.

Why you shoud'nt disclose your ai use. of the paradox of this will set. Pressure to keep professional secrets as AI is used via mass media like disney and nintendo. What about the the indie author and that kind of responsibility?

Greg Welfords weighs in with beep boop.

Wow evn an Anti had gotten paranoid of being accused.

Dammed if you do damned if you don't, IDC it ain't my problem. 100% ignorance with all the volume over impact of qualitiive experience.

Then some smug misanthrophy if chavenistic purity, and pop.

Even trained writers who don't use it are scared that they will be which-hunted thank replaced.

Since the AI detection complex is baseless on LLM free will with stochastic gradient descent base, this wild goose chase will certainly have to take a GTFO approach.

So now we will see more quietism, more paranoia, and now more bumfuggery with illegal doxing.

Oh wait

IS THIS AI?

no 

Peter has be recording the abuse

Cw racism and slurs)

Utility = outcome deon = Intrinsic justness

Is this a call to action to become the editors of all non-mediocrity, or am I trying to interpret it? Yet with the neoliberal paranoia, it looks like this interpretation may not last.

It was all an overview of the course of an art lawyer.

So is the social media machine of advertising revenue of commodification and all that manner of commercial law that it will lead into?

I'm dipping back into Bryan's files and papers again with social sciences; he's trying to argue for the moral philosophy. Being a lawyer, it's his job. Browsing online, with it are all the ways of stochastic gradient descent. Aligning with and heightening of the commodity relations within sociology.

A blank slate, although not reflective of the equilibrium of epigenetic distribution of each and every telonomy of the enabling constraints and biomechanics, can lead to governance away from heriditarian authority. Or aristocratic, exceptional pretensions.

Wow, that's avoiding eugenics here in regard to judgement and police formation.

Proscenium opening

https://billingblox.chargefield.com/

That impression in a world of billing boxes of post-commodity delight. Frantz Fanon called the forgotten the 'Black'. The proscenium, with the desire of the other.

With the need to reach complete entertainment of our satisfactions from Hegel. With these regressions and progression of direction of our arguments, it meant to show within the social media colosseum.

How is it that those conflicts and recollections, we are the centre of them?

Sometimes with a high-status market category, it's hard to fix. Can do what to do without the permission of groups.

On plot:Spectacle C.Dereck Varn

Memory of C.Dereck

This is a comment:

Being an entertainer, I can only find the concepts of Harlan Ellison's The Glass Teat inspiring to create literary entertainment. This concept aligns with Byung-Chul Han Cognitainment concept with my craft, I seek to make it into the creative commons. I can only assume our old copyright framework aids in this diffuse atomisation, like you said.

With all the cargo culting though.This may be the limits of our meliorism, granted with our social apparatus of these platform capitalists, left to our own devices to raise consciousness.

So I can only think of connection while still at the tension of these commodity relations as an edutainment creative class owning the means of production. Then carry on.

Seeing the normalised advertising and commodifying proffesion left to us, along with the subvertisement. The only thing on these platforms is locked within. It's arguable that with all this automated white-collar work now, it's going to first to go. It's a fascinating subject that came from aristotle of plot:spectcale, Robert Mckhee's argued in one of his craft books there is no distinction.

I guess we will have to move on with commodified para-social relationships from platform to platform. Thx for the talk, been doing my best to inform my praxis while not falling into the pragmatism traps.

More on entertainment, good and bad. I've read about:

Harlen Ellison's The Glass Teat 1+2 And his speech on toilets
Byung-Chul Han's The Good Entertainment > Those are goof
Robert McKee Character
Nicolas D Villarreal a soul of a new type

David Foster Wallace talk on consumerism > mid
The Attention merchants : Tim Wu

Neil Postman on Amusing Ourselves to Death and Technopoly. ( I don't know how long those ideas have lasted) >Negative

-

Team Britannia, Team America World Police redux.

Inspired by this review of Team America, and comparing it to Rogert Ebert. Both reviews create a paradox on non-contradiction. The editorial and the number of institutions that sneered or the ones that embraced it with the academia's own view.

Despite the vulgarity being on the course with the duo. This has aged generously. If not due to luck, then due to playing the improvisational game of turning what was once a sleeper hit of non-judicial spaces into a cultural touchstone.

So what can I learn? Epistemic luck and being at the right place at the right time is still a thing; you can't count on it though in the studio. Improvisation, planning, overplanning and then the curtailment.

They will always be cheaters and gamers, social media gamers and all that industry plant react stream banality at any polemical tension.

Even now though, these polemists may have become peace-makers or diplomats; I haven't checked on their body of work of the later seasons on an LS mark episode overview.

"I'll promise i will never die" anticlimantic moment.

The crass xwitter spectacle of provocateur oligarchs

Each and every day, OpenAI and grock, these two are the ai companies that suck the most.

It sucks since it's due to the provocateurship, the ones that took an accidental discovery to an annoyance. Is it that when China releases something, Twitter artists (derogatory) throw pretensions and now? Two billionaires act like clueless chickens.

So yeah, this is in response to Gio's response to Anthropic to the defence party; it was a kerfuffle.

Ain't GyenSynder a left populist, btw? Oh well idn follow her.

On Piracy, not on stipends or royality.

The anarchist zines happened, with all the contradictory ideologies along with the

Oh look, an anarchist zine library with all the points of disagreement, yet with preservation of knowledge like the Internet Archive. I'm not sure if I'm going to read them all, yet here it is.

I'm not even an anarchist. Given that these ideas are meant to spread, with my fair share of disagreements, it can get too anti-dom of a sort.

It's all research of a sort not fitting for a microblog. They do share a view of ip law abolition, though.

They may call me tankie, or that term, even though I identify as a hobby sociologist.

status/situation of centrist status swirls

Hey, wanna be banal? Want to have no opinion? Want to be nothing?

It's easy money, a sinicure, a cush job.

Merely exist, then wait till death.

What's that? No opinion.

Well, that's what a clerk happens to do, or what happens with low self-esteem.

Sit on the fence, try to be proud, yet not, and take the commodification word too seriously with amoral patterns. There are hills to die on, and the one that claims and ontologises everything and nowhere on a base of solipsism arrives at nowhere, with an opportunistic meliorism with that mentality.

Oof.

Or why be polemical? (or have opinions to government)

The spectacle slips

• Due to masks slipping and my respect for talent slipping. Better to work with easy-to-work with peers rather than a insufferable talent
• Since obedience to exploitative schedules is a liberal hustle culture lie shared with the Protestant work ethic of the past.
• Since if I don't campaign and advocate for myself, then I can't complain.
• Since I can't control the crowd, yet I can see the celebrity and catechisms that lead it.
• The entertainment suspension of polemics is itself a radical act, even if it's indie industry.
• To not be groomed into traps.
• "Someone withholding information dreams to be your master." Quote from Sid Meier's Alpha Centaur (that's a bonus, I don't play games anymore.)
• Pagliccu syndrome, or comics unable to able act like hide there clownery
  
• Stalking horses masquerading as entertainment
• Because it's fun, even if I scream from a paytoilet

Double lifes

The pornographic libertine Epithumos, and erotics of art.

merely post a transactional porn of sexual capital, Thanks 1dime, that's entertainment clerkism and that's all that bean-counting does. Oh well, It's like I'm taking part of that with my own typing and production of illustrations, gracing amongst commoditised, conventionalised norms of social media, yet it's a matter of understanding and being aware of it.

To create a double life of a jerk-off bubble.

Then there are the other curational accounts that are not straight up porn which help create culture, and they are helpful too; the sfw ones that do it about sensation and the phonomological account of one significant curator of freelance curation can add taste and direction to the culture that nurtures it.

Or the intellectual curated

Directly polemical, not apologising.

This may be where the satirists and direct market happen with demand and the react streamers who happen to move towards the amount of ideological driving and various positions.

As a sociologist, one mus curate that too.

fatalism destiny of elitism

These anti-realist, anti-representation attempts.

That Orson Welles turned his nose up at those snooty naught experts while teasing his audience with his wife in such an anti-plot way. Creatives in the field are faces with an academic system that has failed to overcome the gatekeepers.

So, left to fend for themselves or get lucky, as they say.

With what attempts to hold together, even with a pirate/anarchism, there are attempts to hold a leadership, or they call it Hydra leadership. Yet to be proven.

Can there be fatalism to consumerism and business transactionalism? Of middle class transactions, there are other business models. Cost of living and such. Or the owning-class property relations or the working class relations in; tension as the divide is made.

To pick which fates and destinies is all part of the commitment.

Oh, I'm thinking about this Marxist sociologist, Nicolas D Villarreal using the labor theory of value. of the beep_boop solutions.

Another grandad visit

Mind was full of dogwhistles. To find honesty within government matters Is a mental toil. Yet I take my energy from trying to console Grandad in his late days.

These times I want to be young and carefree with the childish flying. So I have to make something that ain't Junuphobia.

Talks of beep boop, Grandad. My exposé on the Disney exposé went ignored. There goes my polemics, down in non-newsworthiness. Ruthlessness does not count as the spectacle self-implodes and sells spectator tickets with its frumpy enforcement.

Disney, with its lapdogs, the embarrassing performances of unintentionality. Obsessing about it now as they deliver blockbusters mystifies the iconoclast within me.

So, hospital bed and smartphone photo sharing with filters and how normalised it's become.

Sigh. Apart from the denialists, or miserablist enforcement, still alive. The ai issue is with my trying to remain a freak away from the hypemonger.

I've yet to read a giant back catalogue that makes me snobby with video games. Time was on my mind, yet so was A Confederacy of Dunces.

Enough of the self-important news made a spectacle. Slap of pain out. Cheddar cheese lunch sandwich.

His consciousness is there, barely registering as I explain my project too. Not sure how this licentious youth I have left contrasts with the stoic, frail tradition left to reconstruct into fiction. What a word! It's normalised. Glad age puts another in a state of mind. I'm silly and occupied with my own domination of 230 of a bill of anti-trust which I'm doing.

On vulgar Auteurism, Vulgar style/genre

Kyle Kallgren likes to be the critic of literary auteurs. Or the art director/producer running the show and their vision.

Yes, even with style, even with genre, one can still be bad.

Axiology does not care about the legalese pf
the front cover, the performance the the resonance which follows after, beyond the natural law.

So that from court of law to public. It remains the distinction of low and high still. It can be suspended to serve plenty of stimulation.

Or YOU TEARING ME APART!! LISA WITH SYMBOLIC JUSTICE

video 🔻🛋 on the best/worst over-distributed vanity film. In the spirit of Robert Mcghee. Of the spectacular production and the founderent manueavuring through the industry. Deproffesional within the social media.

(Wonder where Kyles video will be next? I don't follow him.)

Notes on oversetext design course

. The meta of social media is the limit of the craft, with people copying conventional IP to thirstrap/tail at the treat. Is that what one of the polemical essays did? Try to highlight this cargo cult. The commercial illustration mindset!

Wow, banging on the factory settings was a great banger, with its polemics of the one-dimensional man of the standardisation of our consciousness.

The tyranny of the firm is one that's to be solved through other essays which deal with contract law and freelancers alongside that with the chokepoint of vertically integrated media.

The Nature of the Firm by RH.Course

Freelancers founded into a new venture should act more like enterprising firms; who'd have thun
k it.

The video explaining modernism and its polemical connotations was spot on.

Wonder what oversetect will be after I Post this? Regardless, I'll thank him for the list.

Seth Godins cold copyright response

"Id you're a mediocre freelancer/firm, you're doomed, I can get a mediocre illustration from Stable Diffusion, and I own the copyright. Yet if you're the one and only illustrator, then I'll hire you" memory from one of his podcasts.

Did he mean this? A curation site I found.

One could argue his embrace of Ai (He does not use it for his blogs) Was his view of the mediocrity an annoyance, well, he's out of the call-out posts. So his ideas, including with his card pack, is to roll with it.

The systems of mediocrity was already here, that's what I agree with most.

Yet, he keeps writing. This is an indication as a b-corp liberal that's had it with this misconceptions of these business.

Wow, This fan blog of his writing style of publishing is still going huh?