Strucurisation of scenes

This is a doodle pad now, something that a traditional artist will do to prepare his lines.

 Sociology has advanced, huh?

So, according to the story grid. One of the skills to write must have is writing not beats, something that an illustrator or actor must focus, but scenes. Yes, scene obsession from the Mise en place to Mise en scène. 

Scene scenes, that's the work that's building into sequences that completes a sentence, that completes an act, that complete a play, that completes a piece of entertainment/art piece.

From the objective view of a copywriter to the subjective view of a memoirist, why not both? Paradoxes merge into new concepts.

1:38 hour video, had some disagreements with the saphir wharf hypothesis and other theorys, source, though. Sociology will compliment the fictional ways of the novelist.

Our actions define our standards then back again, it's a circle way and since there freelancers have no higher authority or status to guide them, it's up to them and there responsabilitys.

Escapism ; Activism and videogamers as prosumer

I'm going to have to read/audiobook infinite jest, don't i? Given his thought experiment of the amusement-to-death show, from Jokers laughing gas to Neil Postman Amusing ourselves to death. Well, to clarify, this is critiquing gamers as a consumer demographic/physiographic by industrial standards.

Even with literary/commercial when it comes to editing, there's the 

Despite sentiments trying to depoliticise escapism, even if it leads towards the polite fictions outside. Our interactions of social media cannot afford to have our break as our fiction, from slice of life to slice of escapism, warrants it.

Suggest the webs we weave out of the fiction, inspire our acts and vice versa, rainbow capitalism is the case for it, (yet, given my position, not really. )

This is why I don't consider gamers, with their prosumeration and lack of literacy-friendly ways, to be considered worthwhile. Priories of finding a way out of babysitting cultural distress signal.

30 minute

ViDEo GaMes

Includes Bob Chipman (I have my fair share of disagreements with this critic, he was trying to be a literary critic, even ten years ago, it goes to show within the span of time how much gamers haven't grown out of this consume-first mindset.)

It's so editorial resistant to its own pretensions, so I'd best deliberately ignore such theatrics.

15 min 13 years ago

I don't follow him any more.

The continued tantrums as a business model, ah, how it insists respect from the editorialists and expertise while also to doing the work to earn it.

Another one to finish, Tooltime as been an old video blogger with his own therys of media of why he does not engage with it, why he ain't boring. He does not have to grow, and that's enough.

This one of them is cultivation/hyperdermic theory, cultivation theory of influences being a theme. Ten years ago, wow, back when I was a kid. 36:20

He's the only one who has done a good faithed critism of a mediocre essay series.

Why I am a literary editor, not a commercial one.

 Since commercial speaks for itself, I aim for the long-risky term and along more complexity of an established foundherentism principle. Figuratively in it's totaly.

That's what literature and by definition is, most of the ludo logical tautology online simple is not. Literacy requires pretension to be comprehended from audience to author. Where hypocrisy with all the affecting that since entertainment writing is meant. Entertainment writing ain't as pretentious as academy, editorial, journalism, and politics.

Yet such a distinction is worth talking and reminding once and again. That's for the foolish fiction to be the philosophical fact, to editorialise and to fictionalise once again.

https://substack.com/@ayanartan/note/p-153820574

Since the net, everybody can copyright now (Including this link towards pretension! Wow) Yet with everything with hyper-measurement, it ain't that scruncabley simple.

Types of Puritanism not worth persuing.

 See what I did there? In terms of dogmatism, bull crud may hide behind pureness, too.

• Copyright industry complex
  
  
• Creationism in western spectacle
  
  
• Mass media advertising (copywriting knows)
  
  
• Young adult (genre) you may as well write smut at that point.
  
  
• Sunk costs
  
  
• Monoposy of hypersexualisation
  
  
• LGBTQ
  
  
• Opportunism paradox worship
  
  

Types of Opportunism not worth pursuing

An anarchist gave the definition of Puritan/opportunism in regard to which political organizing is worse. He went with the opportunism. (Badmouse was his name)

 Defeatism and the opportunism. Puritanism and the other alternative, That's another element.

Bull crud masquerading as Opportunism are the worst.

• Steam greenlight dogmatically spamming their belief of the number go up
  
  
• Rule 34 art (obvious, there was a discourse of how fan fiction. Will die on the
  hill that some fan fiction is better than commercial published.)
  
  
• Mass marketing campaigns for fundraisers and rogue freelancers, social
  media is social media, not hustle/spammer media
  
  
• Instrumental Role players who want to see their high SEO sexualised subject.
  
  
• NFT crypto
  
  
• Derivative Intelligence
  
  
• Copyright maximalists
  
  
• Multi-level marketers
  
  
• Certain New age market
  
  
• Inspiration porn

"You can't edit that" Edify Education Learning

Really simplifying the process? Wow.

 No more at this age shall our ideas have become so syncretic, so blended, so individualistic as our labels are made now.

My sympathies for ideology were not the same five years ago, and the others today of this now.

Now it's changed, it's changed of governing ways that have been grown sympathetic and not, with the following a means to not.

Edify : is a matter of conversation of generosity for out of struggle.

Education is a means of credentials to demonstrate an impression on another. To be elected. 

Learning is a continual ship of appropriating new ideology, taxonomies, and typology within the practicing technologist's domain knowledge. Re-appropiated or not.

The A.I Gulf, and auto-posting software : Postbirb/Buffer

When you do research to do a journalistic piece. You go around all the Internet to editorialise into an essay, these are all notes. Incoherently placed, here we go.

Since others use auto-posting software, I've dabbled within postybirb, and the more dubious online app buffer. I discovered Buffer advertises itself with link shortening, so I'll be direct. ( No point hiding it, I don't think boycotting/blacklisting will work either. ) Toothpaste is out of tube.

It's dubious since it has an auto-durative intelligence, that I haven't used. That if you want my word, since I want to be a professional writer, the portmanteau between illustrator and writer is a cartoonist. Not going to be using the 

( Postybirb does not do this, by the way. Even though, a spell checker is always appreciated for typos. )

No, I don't endorse it, yet my vote ain't going to count, ain't it? It's been integrated within 'Grok' within xwitter, and that I've been. There's still a rough folk congregation, a Venn diagram of the forming groups under various labels and political sympathies. I have some for the open source with my gift, as long as I own it. Well, It's the time for the commons and public domain have been useful services to our society. My characters coming from pride and prejudice.

(Sometimes I anthropomorphize my ideological conflicts as characters for my entertainment, Regardless. Do I even Fictionalise myself into a entertainer to absolve any responsibility? I'm certainly against the maximisers and what Chuck Wendig has done.)
To sketch out the labels some further, This is what called positioning:

Ai Futurists - Open sourcers ()  Copyright Maximisers - Ai Haters
Lets show this concept some more.

Some people use sneer/scare quotes within open source.

Fair use is always going to be murky water. You don't own concepts, poses, or colour schemes.

The grifters are the tasteless Elsa gate churners targeting illiterate kids to game with the essentialising of money for their product. Perfectly designed, unlike the imperfection wabi-sabi of art.

Despite Seth Godins endorsements of tech, I'm a technologist when it comes to aiding within the creative labour industry and freelance sectors. It's still decimating as we speak. I'll keep track of him. His take on AI going through a Gartner hype-cycle is another thing. It's something I resonate with, since once again, This genie has been out of the bottle.

With indie publishing, even when small businesses themselves can be as bad as their commercial counterparts. Then with Stephanie Sterling and above with the many disputes of Fair use being a muddy term of creation.

The water-usage is overblown, I've donated directly to Ecosia, which I recommend switching your search engine too. Heard it's less than boiling a kettle, I've rebalanced by carbon with a donation that I'm planing to give or my own writing of fiction.

Filippo Valsorda

‪@filippo.abyssdomain.expert‬

There must be something about wasting water that really clicks with people, maybe because they can visualize it? It's kind of farcical, the WaPo story about this tried to make it sound like a lot of water and in the process admitted it's... not?

‪Filippo Valsorda‬ ‪@filippo.abyssdomain.expert‬

·

6mo

Holy f**k I missed that: TRAINING ALL OF GPT-3 consumes in total as much water as... producing beef for two people for a year. Not pro-rated to the usage of GPT-3 two people make in a year. Total. And we get a whole article about the water consumption of AI?! bsky.app/profile/ryan...

December 17, 2024 at 2:27 AM

1 repost

9 likes

Since the growing of the usage of AI, I've been following the blogging of various writers who's describing their thoughts. So I'll have to keep track of this. Oh, I will vote for the shadow libraries because it's a means to spread the idea. I shall defend to the death for a creative to sales rep for free and paid. The economy of gifting and hobby does not exist.

I'll resolve this with a video by Shaquille on this. 21 min for those who have missed it.

They'll certainly be a market for hand-made craft, with more and more of this silly technology play-do'd search matter will create more blacklist. I speculate that it's still going to resurface with new iterations. This regurgitation is tasteless. This lack of direct action from others is also tasteless.

I do believe good artists should get paid for the labour and activism, yet this will move towards my leanings, given with my own accord. Copyright maximalism ain't the answer. It's not like these untouchable technopolys deserve any PR anyway, including Nintendo.

(Oh, and the reason I keep using bug is a two-way posting. Reduce cognitive load.)

Do contact me though, I don't

Typological awakening, out of mimes

It still surprises me today that people don't own and label it, words mean things, and they lead into our taxonomies that are countable and then into a dialectic to our countable.

Abstraction and self-referential reexamination can matter deliberately. As Plato pointed up with the paradox of our enlightenment with his cave.

Instruction prose and poetry without the form. Has managed to hyper-focus the writing facilities to a point that's made. Out of the monkey see monkey do, from quick social media.

It's stopped to make me think like a mime. Out of such a biological taxonomy of carnality, an ideal, and principle helps to pull out a long promise. Away from the race to the bottom.

Good design does not necessitate instruction, prose or poetry, yet it does not entail it. Especially when delivered.

Priotisation/Optimisation

There's etymologising, 3d optimisation use within three modelling and commercial optimising.

 SEO or the other way around. One of the factors to consider within decision-making with putting resources and attention into in regard to the concept of importance.

The means to distinguish, or to calculate. What is an axiology, what scales within power scaling within each mind. To be squashed into a huge box of mechanised content, them moves into a new section.

Efficiency and simplicity are not necessary a means of making things better for those who the artist intends to serve, even if it matters. Death of the author or Intentional design.

This afternoon when those who values mechanical simplest he when they see everything as a nail they become the Hammer. One who hasn't conceptualised towards the importance of what can only see the quickest things.

Only a matter of the hacks that can't read, that's a problem with the NSFW genre in general. If every lane looks the same with no discernment of action, then it all funnels into the word of 'content'.

When there's no distinguishing of alternative, where do you go?

Well, act accordingly. Is the priority within our idealogy for a long term benefit, or the short term benefit of the sexploitative public road? Material reductionism is still vulgar.

Hills to die on

Abstract expressionis

Make a principal standard for those who make excuses. Not in a editorial way. Prudish and promiscuous left withstanding.

Not countable by any metric. It's hijacking, all that amount made with the way that's requires new hills.

Such are held within the mind though, that's the problem with such vulgar reductionism that happens with such as the Techno-cruncher, and then the crumbly, down to no solid point.

Well then, there's going to have to be a better hill to die on, not today. There's a prosumer demographic of gamers. Drawing lines in the sand is what makes our points of view.

(Racism discussion ahead) 

Theodor Adorno's concepts are standardisation will have to move into new concepts. Welp, seek and create the new, Nobody's perfect, as this essay of Adorno Demonstrates. Critical theory adapts.

Autonomous art

Theodore Adorno, the indirect confrontation. I'll adore.

No point writing to hustlers who don't read, or who can't label or own their slog. No purpose to feed data and not itself, where's the sincerity of it? The short term wants of the audience cannot be made, is there balance? Should there be one?

The claim that it can completely independent is itself a political statement, the avant-garde defence. These are apologetics with their own character.

It's all about for vendors who don't want to listen, or do a rote mechanism towards a reductionist idea of transaction. All to the idea of being irresponsible to job specification. If only they were only more direct with their hustle.

Well, that's what it takes, with such as confrontation, even interpretation.

Which is why the prosumer itself feels like the most condescending, degrading to the craft of art to hackneyed product. So the paradox comes to move upwards again. The prosumer has a memory of a goldfish.

Commited art

I cannot separate art from artist, as with commitments, everybody's got a pontification of it. I'll say it's certain vendors' neutrality.

Fiction ain't directly political. The truth holds in the indirection.

Essays, editorials are. With no artifice. Direct confrontations can overlap, not drive the theme within the fiction.

They are always there, those who pontificate avoiding dramatizing/controversy is itself an dramatisation. Accepting a cold defeatism of entertainment that could be the lay like that. Or, beyond the amusement, there's the artifice, along with action.

That is, what commitment ought to show. With no apology. To the audience with tension. To that insufficient bread and circus. The mysticism that self-contradicts.

I semi-agree with Bertolt Brecht about political illiterates, by the way, the only problem with that is that they deliberately don't read, which is counter to it all.

Contributions to the age of sceptics

 The collective consciousness has spoken. Everbody's jaded. So it's our time to see if it's time to move from the copywriting, from action towards age of belief.

•  Politicians
•  Grifters and scammers
•  Spammers/Trolls
•  Slop/< Only applies to literary types
•  People who don't read
•  People who don't choose to read
•  Certain authority positions in general
•  Technocrats
•  Hardcore Gamers
•  Tantrum-throwers
•  Industry complex apologetics
•  Imposters not being pretentious
•  Tantrums
•  Hustle culture
•  Toxic Positivity/Dogma
•  Anesthetization
•  Vulgarisation

Nicey-nice Exocolonist objection

[CW: Discussion of politics, Nazism and Christian topics]

Such a term made to describe prosumerist trends online. "No pawlitics" with a rabid defence. If you do the language of entertainment, do it right.

Be it cultivation or hypodermic

Link to the exocolonist article by Doc Burford can be cussy, drives a point home though.

I can feel the neophiliacs tension with this quote, thats only in so far as the intended audience cares about the newness alomg with there vendors.

"Look, you can never consider yourself special or discerning for enjoying a product that employed a literal army of marketers in a skyscraper somewhere with the express goal of getting you, personally to spend money on the product. You’re a consumer. You bought the most marketed thing in the world. It’s like basing your personality on liking Coca Cola, the most popular soda on the planet. Congratulations on being the laziest mother______r alive, incapable of discovering anything for yourself because you’re an incurious f___.

Why would you ever demand respect for doing something easy? Why would you demand respect for liking something popular? It’s popular, which means a lot of people like it. By definition, you cannot be special for liking the big and popular thing!

But along comes the person who buys the game with the ads in Times Square and the commercials on the television and the standee in gamestop and the neverending press coverage (because it gets the clicks, and who’s doing the clicking? a lot of other people just like you!) and they go “I’m special! I’m special for consuming the commercial product!”

I wouldn’t consider you a discerning consumer for buying a McDonald’s McChicken sandwich every day, so why would I consider you a discerning consumer for buying the most commercial s___ in the world?

Congratulations on being boring.

Now, hey, this isn’t to say you can’t enjoy popular media! I enjoy a McChicken. The Last of Us 2 had a pretty good shotgun and some nice graphics! But to suggest that you are special for consumption? That’s what is ludicrous. It’s not even serious. It’s pathetic and boring."

He rants about wholesome next, along with escapist and ironic within entertainment, that's another thing with commercial fiction.

Such is our rule 34, clickbaitiness that's harmless since it is fictional entertainment, technically. (Well, the rule 34 kink scene never changes, it never does Wow, how they hack it away within their territorialism of slop. That's what the hackneyed defeat of it all of these platforms want, more data, more coursing and the end.

I can only relate to them with these other platforms, propriety strictness of the platform with a SEO that's hard to ignore.

It's still prosumers for the dysfunctional business models awaiting it's return. Act on the platforms accordingly. Aah, the annoying commercialism and it's paradoxs. thats another pondering. (Even the article asks for it, welcome for the machine.)

Trying not to caricature

Tried not to caricate Elon Musk.

Oh well, it's been in entertainment from its inception. Try not to get angry at somebody who has destroyed a distribution for artists/entertainers along with Steve Bannon, bsky. Out of the frying pan...

Did well even though I'm more of an idealist with my romantic drawings not that complicated, like I needed an editor.

Even with the charity through romantcism, he still gets an uncharitable treatment within my zine.

Ex Nihilo/Ex Post Facto

To make something completely new and to make something completely before, well what a difference.

Attacking the origin of our cultural creation, coming from our Western Latin zeitgeist.

From myth means story and story means beats or the scene, shall we affect the process of our creativity into intuitions codified into or our own mediums. Yet to create something fresh and from the ascribed behind ness. Are those things coming into being.

So it exists, responsible or not. As the existentialist say, existence precedes essence.

From the novelist is the fandom/cover, hackneyed artist. (Paradoxical, yes it is. I am it myself.) Every pre-illustrated design being copied within the algorithm, to feed or to lead. Engagement in what?

Indeterminate of pretension to convergence

What a complicated way to say focus. Yet logicians in philosopy don't pull there punches when talking there jokes to academics.

Such as the troubles of learning to forcibly focus, isolated and into the trials.

Not wanting to be picked, not being selected within the right place in the right time.

Merely sticking towards a Wacom screen and not looking at the second screen. Along with thinking as an unglamorous producer, then not. Wrestling with the plumber paradox.

A ditch digger though, what a method to loosen writer's block, to loosen it's holding.

Then, when it publishes, the body of work continues.

So what is ultimately sold to the advertiser on platforms is tension, distilled.

Another fanart. Citizen as product.

HpComic, With the lack of demand I was picked with the infinity of e-begging, had to approach him with extreme compassion.

 That's it, everybody is fishing for attention to covert into money, and it's the growing undercurrents where it's all socio-political again.

Will always hold whatever way to reach for attention under suspicion.

Sure enough from thr mos cynical to the most optimistically believable, shall another post pass.

Gotta understand how important credability is.

Clarification of Intention : Non-Fiction

"Seven min which could be five. Warm fluffy sweats from Christmas, and worn-out sneakers, has its function still. I stand like a wobbly chess piece." 

That was the moment where I had known, that these attempts of writing that I'm trying to think clearly, even if it's for myself.

Even if it's all newspeak and conspiracy, I will only believe a few that are backed.

Like how social media is a training ground for popular publishers. At least the literary publishers are honest about delivering an audience.

Best be aware that we are a resource for these types.

Frustrations of a other place: Twitch

What came to me with that couch?

Did I see an embarrassment? Failed Irony? Insight that are my creativity ain't going to be rewarded by the financial goals of ad driven sites?

All rhetorical questions. Yearning for imposter syndrome, within fictional entertainment.

There could be a billion reasons for a single view on my channel, and they could be a much more. Ain't my job to probe why. Pretentious meeting simulator within network television. That's mass media. There goes more attention to a sloppy crypto ad.

Getting off twitch has been a boon, oversharing is exhausting.