Dumping Human Spam

I had to use another sneer, because Joseph is not even using ChatGPT, but the fact is he is just such a bland intellectual pabulum guy—or an intellectual-grade kind of commodity-brain stuff. He is never direct.

I will give him credit: he may have given a platform to other people, philosophers, too. That is the stuff I would appreciate. And his video against MRAs is delicious. 

But, again, he could have done this supervised, with editors, and on display.

Watching President's Sunday critical theory, though. All things being equal.

Even he criticised the way his manner to making the way as a publicity function.

So that's it, with publicity figures I can dump if they don't deliver.

No critical theory is perfect though, I know I'm not that of a hegelian circle.

Populist discussion

We may be a populist slopper myself.

Idk this guys voting preferences

This is why I have also foundherentism, folks, because I have no fixed fundamental points. Within populist, mid, and elite mentalities, it all monistically travels back and forth. A mindset along with the material conditions.

Yet with fluent internet speak and lingo, I still tag him. And with him, like an anime villain, a villain I see eye to eye with.

But am I a villain, too?

Does the dialect tension matter? It's going to end one way thanks to the totality of the spectacle.

We will have to deal with our own populist tendencies as the way forward.

Discussion within the west.

Property is coercive

Wow, is the moral panic still going? Well, since the randos on BlueSky are commenting fiercely back at me, I'll just put this here because why not? 

This one is for the beep boop, and it deserves reiterating.

Yeah, I don't think it is. America's irenicism It's a stagnation; conflict is life, and even if I ironically point out the mistakes this tension has, I may be branded as a target. So I'm going to hold it out as the RFK of the world; therefore, this way is the new anti-vax movement.

Got that from the anime horsegirl lover...

Trying to artificially limit the supply of their favourite TV show. There harry potters, there

Its like, thanks west, thanks west.

Destroy this industry for me

 Had to watch Harmful Opinions; did not know his voting habits. Idc. Not that presumptive.

Idc about the language taboos now since I'm a dignitary to the internal rules.

So happy to view other views through independent research, even though I don't decide to be an independent researcher.

So that, with his way of thinking that "gamers deserve the worst" oof, the blame game, whatever the ritual negativity and all, and trying to explain with the pop YouTube scene, is making me jaded.

So, the delusion is that as LLms are used averagely and specifically, there are many cases I now see with academia and the cancel culture that will be with it all. This is the way we cope with the interchange.

Sunk fair weathers

Random business owner, good takes though

What may happen.

I did my best to try to be reasonable, yet now it's going to be more ghosts, more giving less of a cushion, and more careful curation of my feed list.

"I had to block mutuals since they were sharing techlash editorials since they could not know that much." Another leftist programmer, well, progressive, as in 'progressive' can mean many things now. Regressive to progressive to one signal to another.

The crack in the window of the atheists with the crack of the window with 2023 cannot be undone. It's why we can't unite, and that's good.

What are we doing now? What with our own minds with the Cult of Reason and the religion of humanity, all for the symbolic capital of copyright maximalism.

What are we on.

Beep-boop Bioweapons

Some populist microblogger is misreading headlines once again. Screenshotting the headline and going (OH NO)

Wow, thanks, media determinism, with the moral panic industry complex with several 9/11s happening simultaneously. Now I know why I respect principled entertainers who distract from the stressful days.

This is to prevent viruses, not the other way around. Gonna quote Dame.

This only works if you don't have a copyright maxmilist poistion and platonic elitism, what where is midjourney doing, oh? it's medical scanners, nvm.

With Peter Coffin bringing in his documentary of what will replace the old breadtube order. Hbomberguy concerned with the platonic elitism with all

The damage of micro-bloggers and the comprehensible gap within the information age is an understatement; I can't do anything to fix this since I need to be a celebrity influencer in order to get any sway within this discourse.

Too ahead of this when I knew the terminally stuck in the presentism so I'm keeping it here.
Jeremy Bentham with the discourse being stuck within sunk costs within america
"If you want to know how AI will affect the world, don’t imagine current AIs simply continuing on into the future. Imagine the world being flooded by AIs that make our current models look like child's playthings—and those being used to build the next generation of AI. Imagine, for the first time, creating something much smarter than humans. I don’t know exactly what’s coming down the pipeline, but it will be strange and terrifying. We are summoning digital aliens into our world, and we are not ready, and we are complaining about the water they’ll drink."

Some politely unfollow me at this point. That's good enough; wading in with options undiscovered is part of the price of connectionism. We exist.

Couch Gregor looks like a bioweapon may be much harder than that. Noah Smith and Jeremy

Wow, so even with all the political scientists, white hat programmers vs black hat. The white ones work.

Sam Harisomy post with his links also works

https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/50/3/86/135683/Deception-and-Detection-Why-Artificial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wgImjg9PPc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_verification

Hugging Face? Well, here's the video on that and the cryptographer

He responded.

Now, we do the cyber-security dance once again. At least it isn't the chronobacteria theorising. So yeah, when they said mainstream media is dead, well, it's alive, perhaps for all the wrong reasons though.

Dead Audience Theory

Since sombody threw a tantrum at me using tts to read my academia.

I'm now brought to believe in dead audience theory.

 So, Now dead audience theory By somebody who is AI-assisted.

This had an ai assisted illustration in it.

Why is it that the anti-science sentiment of simple solutions to complex problems plagues me? middlebrow to highbrow misinformation in American polemics from 2022 2023.

Have you got it too, the mildest blue of tech value, then a shocked person in your stream?

By the look of things, I have not even followed this supposed technocritic once. I don't think he implies it; Neil Postman probably would be able to draw circles around him.

Why do I keep iterating? Well, I don't know; maybe because I have no influence outside of this little tiny plug. With all the things going on outside, I have to take into consideration other people's views the diversity of viewpoints from those who do use the tool and those who don't. 

I'm picking up nice signals that can help me complete my viewpoint in understanding these issues more holistically. Now, that's what you may call critical thinking.

Peter Coffin own words

Apparently I still browse. And he posted a chicken and got called a p******, such is the veracity of the twitter artists.

Remember I don't associate with his views on Ukraine, im more with the Finnish bolshveik with it being a weak imperialist nation, baba bing, done.

Will jury nullify until inquired elsewise

Troglydyte Leftism, a frumpy disorder.

 Yeah, when Peter Couglan made that horseshoe theory, the bougiegese in 1800.

Progressive means multiple things now, since 2023, we looking around and we don't like each other back when since the atheists where together.

Now its more of a informal machine of youngness that I can't relate too.

And I cannot escape it, can only deal.

Another political test?

Why... why.

Is this the brit monkeys way of a political compass in the modern era that's odd. It's political compass all over again. No.

oh I looked at his ai video, despite his inaccuracy's within licensing (To be ignored, I've already written about it.) it's pretty sane ending.

Oh okay, Moving on.

Reasons for the creative commons here, except for my oc CG.

I have written the most naive, incompetent essay for an idealised principle. Yet,

I believe it. Digit-Ethics Manifesto.

Because they can bog off with there intellectual  smoke-blowing and haughty snootiness of false consciousness. Bears repeating. His spirit possessed me to make the 

Acknowledging the good'n bad. We are not going to take your toymakers away, from commodity toy to art. Drm is drm, I won't tolerate snide worship of.

Slide from the a French techno company. 2 hours it's got politics all over it (what do you expect under an editorial.)

by Conspiracy Theories, TechnoFascism, and the Prospects for a... | James J. Hughes, PhD,

A compound workout of and the biceps and triceps of a bench-press 💪🛋

I've never seen such.. a lack of humanity from the confusionism 2023 megacopyright landgrab, and it comes from the 120  media apparatus of 50 years the fissure of the age tradition of 100 tradition of academia (older).

This won't get along perfectly, they will be conflict. Going through though, feels like the option now.

The censorship of free expression is so foundherently wrong that it's worthy hill to die on.

The laws of the Internet shall make my wisdom immortal. Information wants to be free, and beware those who wanna gate it.

Information wants to be free.

Even with the taint of interpopulist dilemma's it has.

his statue website

Wow, that functionalist description is out-dated as I go with Maggie Vale.

Yet everything is a pure though a internet own boy.

Also, Cory Doctorow in the past, was correct about DRM here. I need to compile it all for the internet artifact that this will be discovered on here.
Transcript of that. There's not good social media, so I'm going to keep this in home base.

Mediocrity and the death, by Seth Godin.

All the data here, ain't it special.

The question remains.

So the ideal of Arron Swartz shall live through all of us, monistically.

That Retweet threat that made me quit.

(Naive that I may be, I know that this may be ideal way. Yet clout, social relations and it's operations, I know it's not going.)

I confess, in 2025. Somebody _____ retweeted a death threat and made me depressed for days, on microblogger. It ruined my day with ideation I dare not recall. Had to leave at that point and consider alternatives. There is no sensible discussion, mindless dogma had ruined to internet. Like the mens rights/gamers vs the feminists back in the day.

To the one who thinks accused and taking it personally, do not, your are precious, and I wish not ill will and harm on you.

I'll be fine. My former Kantian ethist within my several years ago awoken within me. With all the reactionary tech-panic radicalisation.

It's locked within a audience capture, circularity, entertainment vs academics/intellectuals in my field then the totality of the spectacle. Something I pruned out of the for you feed so I could not get stress other than the tiny monopolies of something that ain't essentially contingent on a non-dialectic, on the essencilist of the spectacle.

With the need to transcend it.

Then, Substack with intellectuals, non-intellectuals, kidsters, I know that place has bad bloggers, it's one where academics are and the essay was, the written one. Still the same kind of moral panic with perceived job loss, which is why I made that couch-searching treck between philosophers, economists and political philosophers into an idea.

Will it matter that I decided to learn'n teach instead of fight.

Of an ambitious quest into understanding and trying to help a big-gap of those

Idk what to do with that knowledge, out of the moral desert. That i come to admit now.

If i was to blame the im-an-ally-not-bigoted-buts mindset that drove me out. Along with the American exceptionalism. Something felt wrong and my for you feed was the differentiated.

Doesn't matter of mental responsibility? What we are dealing hear where it's a eliminative mind, yet it miraculously has a mind! The pattern and the phenomena is the capacity to express a compatibilist in this regards for a simple question of ethics.

That's where i started to study that due diligence of sociology academics, left accelerationists and a relational companionists, oss programmers, transhumanists/bio cosmists and out of deontic reverence. Simply because I had enough with the polemics of the mass media and its lap dogs with the open source and it's proprietary venture capitals.

With all these dualitys, I haven't interviewed any billionaire, decided to make my own mind up. Out of the dialectic essentialism and into a former deontic past. Into a dialysis, or to explore an alternative, that's what resonated.

Somewhere 2024-25 I left here, with the For you feed of others.

Is this where your catechisms and constructed beliefs are? A deontic circle of peeps who got what they want. Perpetually, unpersuasively.

That is the curse of free will though, you have to acknowledge the good and the bad and recognize it's desire to exist.

This is how it feels like a techno-progressive who does not use AI ATP with the news. Welp.

Yet I'm too ahead of this when I knew the terminally only peeps.
Jeremy Bentham with the discourse being stuck within sunk costs within america
"If you want to know how AI will affect the world, don’t imagine current AIs simply continuing on into the future. Imagine the world being flooded by AIs that make our current models look like a child’s plaything—and those being used to build the next generation of AI. Imagine, for the first time, creating something much smarter than humans. I don’t know exactly what’s coming down the pipeline, but it will be strange and terrifying. We are summoning digital aliens into our world, and we are not ready, and we are complaining about the water they’ll drink."

Some politely unfollow me at this point. That's good enough, wading in with options undiscovered is part of the price of connectionism we exist.

Now that I must disrespect intellectual property by acting dumber and more gaggier. With a less attention to the punditry.

Guess they can do this if it's means have a sensible discussion. There is none

on the vulgar popular polarizations on the hustle funnel that microblogs encourage

Oh, and to work on my compatibilism bridge of economic transformation of this. I'll follow Flazfire's advice with art. Such is the futility of this in current year.

Craft atrophy?

This designer essay was bring up a term.

Along with its adoption

Guess the firms and or entrepreneurs are out there trying there best to create a ruckus.

I'm wondering if this is the brain damage thing reiterated? So I'm going to dismiss it again.

Yet the lie goes around while the truth gets to put it's pants on, so the hustlers got in early with there conventions being established. There really in the forefront.

Yet with it all the matter to bring in, it's paradox, does not matter since natural expression, simple and basic radically, continues without regard of the powerscale of the instruction of the industrial education.

So it does not even register.

Are you in the weights? the beep boop

According to are you in the weights. https://intheweights.com/

I'm an obscure Australian celebrity. Wait, thats not right.

People pressupose this is copyright infringement, i guessit isnt.

So yeah, you can check, even with my dent, guess I've made a impression, you've got to calculate that with how likely a bad actor will misrepresent, be it a collage artist or any copy'n paster. That dystopia of intellectual monopoly is a manner that I'm not following.

This may be incorrect as Seth went. 

Epistemic or it could be speculated and annoying as I'll get more coseire with 

On E_ Zi_____

Or Infamous at this rate, this is vulgar populism at it's core. Link

Is this anti-science? Anti-ecnomics? I've already points the way he treats his other technocritics.

"I want to clarify that I never claimed that OpenAI is a profitable business, or even has a good or sustainable business model, but simply that this data falsifies a big claim that Zitron has repeatedly made. He seems to have moved the goal posts to claiming that training costs should count toward the gross margins, but that is a totally different argument.

If you make money from your customers on average, you can grow your way to recouping even very high fixed costs. If you instead lose money from the typical customer, as Zitron repeatedly contended, then growing more will make you run out of money faster. This is an incredibly important distinction, and getting it wrong for so long (in the face of reporting from the Information, which Zitron favourably cites elsewhere, as well as independent estimates) is frankly disqualifying for a commentator on AI industry economics."

The comments on that is really what this has become, neither critic or booster/hyper

Why do you debate them? Because no, That's why. Look at the comments.

This has escaped sensible discussion and the ruination of organization within disorganization separation of populism and elitism of ideas inter-connect and naïve noble-savage can happen, yet with that. Tech being art in the aristolian sense, that we have to inquire if these are any serious matter or another vulgar critic of crassness to discard with Bull**** jobs that of socioeconomic to regard.

On Classifiers

I see their use is more common now.

Peeps are paranoid about commodification; these are the algorithms and heuristics which linguistics has toppled too. And now they're checking through this. This has been checked adversarially, intuitively and counter-intuitively through a Socratic construction, with some autocomplete along with some other thoughts.

Pangram and others don't work. Or the self-abnegation of personal responsibility. Shall I quote?

Anyhow, here are two articles on why they are not to be trusted. Oh yeah, did I tell you the classifiers don't work in and of themselves? Well, you are the product. More on the math here.

Wow, look at that math.

Including a linguistic lesson on negative construction.

“It's not X. It's why” is a linguistic construction, more specifically, a “contrastive negation followed by a corrective assertion.” It's part of a rich “grammatical context for negated restrictives in English.” Olli O. Silvennoinen wrote an entire doctoral dissertation of 131 pages on contrastive negation.

Other the times, I won't ad hominion him on other bad essays.

Since this is continue with Sam Illingsworth's notes, the bias of these.

"Even a perfect detector would be the wrong tool

Now grant the impossible. Imagine a detector that worked flawlessly tomorrow.

I would still argue against it, for a reason that has nothing to do with accuracy.

The moment you put a detector between a teacher and a student, you change what a teacher is. You turn an educator into a police officer. The work of teaching is to be a co-creator of knowledge alongside the student, beside them while they struggle toward understanding. A detector makes suspicion the default setting. Every essay arrives presumed guilty.

That is not the job I signed up for. I did not become an educator to run my students’ words through a lie detector and wait for a number.

The evidence backs the instinct. I read every public UK university AI policy I could find, 96 of them, for a HEPI policy note this year. On a close reading of a sample, the language of education sat over an architecture of detection and surveillance. And two in five universities had no public AI policy at all. The machinery of policing arrived before the conversation about learning had even started.

You cannot police a student into learning. Detection keeps asking teachers to try."

This tech blogger knows that moral panic won't last.

"Moral panics are largely temporary. Almost everything we were sure would rot our culture, our brands, and the world around us became background noise within a generation. Calculators were going to destroy math; now a kid pulls out a phone to split a bill, and nobody bats an eye. Spell-check was a crutch that would make us all illiterate, and Wikipedia was not a real source, and typing out your essay instead of handwriting it meant you hadn’t learned a thing, and Photoshop meant you could never trust an image again, and Auto-tune was the death of music. Every one of these things caused a moral panic, with op-eds and hand wringing, and - for better, and in some cases absolutely for worse - every one of them is now so normal that the panic feels archaic."

This was the earlier with how it interconnects with the witch hunts

"No, the folks getting hurt are the writers. Not only the ones who are tarred - all of us. Every single ___-forsaken one of us. We are all made smaller by the pursuit of unproven and unprovable purity. Whether Ballard used AI or not (and she says she didn’t, and naive or not I’m inclined to throw my cynicism to the wind and just take her at face value, and you can mock me if you like), the punishment landed before any verdict was reached, because no verdict can ever be reached. Not beyond a reasonable doubt. Never beyond a reasonable doubt.

She’s not going to be the last. This whole setup, where anyone can accuse any writer of using AI based on gut feeling, and broken detection tools get treated as proof and publishers fold at the first hint of controversy because the PR cost outweighs the book’s revenue, is going to grind up a lot of people into a fleshy, bloody, bony paste. Most of them will be small-time writers, debut authors, indie-published folks without the platform or the money to fight back."

(Off Tangent, he does try the cult thing; that's a fandom thing.)

So, what do we do? Trust, trust that it is. (I wonder how much that paradox catches on)