Psychosis on Ai, Bunch O Links of my doubts

Lets try and visualize

 https://minihf.com/posts/2025-07-22-on-chatgpt-psychosis-and-llm-sycophancy/

Andy Minimus also this a post where he this being a minima
l thing. Also did a full character study of him. (Post edit couch Gregor from 2025 ere) He handled the quantitive and qualitative data and turned into knowledge.

That's not to say that there's issues of suicide, covered by verysaneai

Even as there's been articles of it's use as a prosthetic intelligence, then Andy Masley did an accountability thing again.

Phew! That's a lotta links, (I don't expect you to click on them all, I'm still learning to direct response after all.)

Nope, I don't think this covers psychosis, it's reminding me of the way atheists accused theists that they are crazy. This was refuted, and it's not going to happen. The insane asylum ain't coming back.

No no no, let's not try and bring the insane asylum back. With the method being in the madness. Enforced madness that target vulnerable groups is a no- go.

Criminalising the users, while also treating the medium of this as a thing with autonomy, it ain't.

Moving past of the Victorian insanity accusations, we are to make it our pursuit to see how we can decipher and see mental illness and disability as a thing to go with, and that means AI too. I could point out a bunch of men and suits with money as a bunch of freaks, yet that does not go to the heart of ideological and material conditions. It's going to get unhistorical.

Eschatology, End times have been with us all this passages, Yet's that associated with all cults like Scientology and bebops comet. Including, I must say, Atheism science fiction.

Post edit, Peter coffin did a video on it.

(Not an endorsement, he may have used AI in the thumbnail, this is an Editorial ON ai, not endorsement, that speaks more of your epistemology if you see it that way. )

Hmm, so they are going to attempt to make it a felony again with another moral blame parade, I know they were caviller with the training. Not like this, here's a retweet.

"I dunno, when you start blaming OpenAI because unwell people did unwell people things, filing massive lawsuits, and waging ap press campaign, this seems the entirely predictable course correction. You wanted guardrails to ensure mentally ill people can't encounter harmful output, now you got it.
‪Ari Cohn‬
‪@aricohn.com‬· 2mo
I don't want OpenAI scanning conversations and calling the police either, but when you say AI companies should face massive liability when anyone gets hurt, you're asking for the most extreme, CYA results. That's what happens, and has always happened, when you make policy with the plaintiffs' bar."

Guess they need not go scorched earth policy on this.
This reminds me of this opinion