Oct 9, 2025

Thoughts on Andy Masley: the principle of nuance

(Since I've decided that economic downfall is going to continue to get more incredulous, I'll decide to do my own research. More commentators are referring to "Bubble" in quotations.)

(I guess, even with the pre-conceptions and fundamentalists view I'm not a fundamentalist btw, I'm going to leave this one, hopefully they'd use this info reasonably and responsibly. As I'm typing this there are more commentary on the Sora video thing that I'm not going to further comment, not my job.)

Noting and responding to these events is what journalist does with editorial control. Seeing another silly spectacle of narratives in the west always baffles me as I try to evaluate one of the hobbyists here.

Hmmmph, Yep, not going to pop according to this Reuter's article, yet, I know it has not done honest reporting before, yet I trust it here (There was an reporting error within another geopolitical thing that I forgot.)

Okay time for another opinion piece, non-fiction, yep I only write for those who don't tire of it. TBH, nobody on microblogs can read this long anyway, so this is a tactical choice on my part.
This is better at envisioning concepts of the current discourse of AI, thanks, I'll take that positioning axiology. Another collection of notes as I research this technological determinist.
( This is according to him, I'm copy-pasting it. So that there is a clear discussion. )
Written before with my journalism that it's all about seeing what I can do to help out.

That's what copyright is btw, a state-sanctioned monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us. Yes, that's what I do with siding with the creative commons in terms of keeping the internet an open host. So it's a statecraft decision to say that it empowers publishers/publicists too much. Treating them as arbiters, not punishing them.

Copyright is the stuff publishers take from us when we go viral with a book deal, taking 95% percent of the profits once virality hits randomly, that's piracy! (Spoke like Bopkin Cappy there.) It's a publishing right, not a creative right like freedom of expression and assembly.

Yet here we are, having to pick allies, or be passive with this reading.

This propertarian manner, though, I have to reject it. An ascension
on of such a legal fiction to a creative rights will have to do.

I've been trying to build bridges with diplomacy, because y'know what entertainers do is to not send death threats and continue to host a world of wonder. Guess those who serve of giving up their copyright to publishers have put me on the naughty block list, or I'll guess they'll do what I want with toxic positivity, statecraft correctness. I'm in complete agreement with Andy these discourses have become too erm, skirmish for me to keep track.

Andy Masley, despite having loose connections to 80,000, seems to have sensible takes within AI Better than any YouTuber. Could be an appeal to origin to point that he points to vegan posts over there. Needing the foundherent reason for things as things get syncretic, wooo! What a time.

I'll have to fight for my autonomy within certain talking points that invade even the most reputable sources, stuff that I cannot trust now. (Water is a silly metric.) Could honestly do a libertarian socialist solution to all this ai-talk.
Youch, Look at those numbers.
Somebody wrote that the left (or, what I call the troglodyte left, or derogatory slur left) is built on performative bullying (Callout culture) and smug certainty (String Theory like what physicists say), Yet this subject still has that, non-certainty. So take that for what you will, it's only found on Twitter.


We're going to have to be diplomatic, or ignore it entirely. No point at romantising 2022 or even before NFTs, as with things, they're not so simple as a twitter 140 character count.

( I'll look at AWAY are we art yet Tumblr and see if I can get back to you, and I've been following Fox Key as my news man and takes on AI to stay updated. )

Deciding to not associate with anti or pro, or synth, I merely keep tract because to pick a side could lead into some opportunistic hurdles. However, I still resonate
with the existential naturalism that I had during my atheist days, (still do) so now reading and commenting on such blogs, it's been helpful thought fodder.

Bonus bonust link

He did one on data centers

I'll be keeping track of the info with this podcast on analysis with, Sam Harris?? Oh, he ain't ranting about muslims, hmmph. Welp, will document. It's called the last Invention.

I may describe myself as a Preparationist, i had the Misrablism of Doomerism in this discourse.

For the sakes of interpretation, This visualisation model includes all interpretability of the models with explanations. Well, all reinforced that this lacks free will with pre-determined indeterminacy going into a gradient descent of probability.

https://bbycroft.net/llm


You're a nuanced reader, aren't you? Well, there you go. Yet as I learn this, I'm going to go deeper.

Also, Philosophes debate consciousness of machines, like the materialist conception of the qualia.