Oct 10, 2025

Entertainment diplomacy or Call outs, clanker slur discourse.


 The show must go on, and the show must go on, and the show must go on.

Yet I know being a host I'm going to move one as with my own means.

Or should I do ruthless expose, revealing the truth, go for ideals? What is a host going to do when the issues hit close to home and you have to make a stand? All rhetorical.

Ideology, materialism. I can't understand call-outs these days within political action and then there are the entertainers who happen to dazzle away and do not care, yet with the creation of slop, with understand. Silly waves of attention, silly waves of attention.

Ah, This will never be a call-out, only a dismissal channel. Like I left Anita Sarkeesian, and others, I simply moved on with the push and pull of belief systems tugging me in different directions.

Entertaining hosts and an editorial call-out artist, an essayist who tries to make some better of the slop, With it although, they can only say that the show must go on. Welp, we are going to be living with provocateur bait and panic averages stuff.

Oh, and there's a link to the Clanker slur discourse, which is a silly hilly to die on. Yet another reason why some mis-foundherent ways of social media discourse can't be taken seriously. Despite the adultism, the discourse has got, naive, coarsened thanks to the media. Thanks internet. White people hijack everything.

https://gyges-blog.ghost.io/robot-slur-discourse/

"I don't want to die on this hill. I think this is hill is dumb. I don't even want to be on this hill. I don't think this hill should exist. I have just found it impossible to ignore."

"
"Presumably they imagine that this will only ever hurt people who are inordinately attached to technology. Unfortunately, disabled people tend to be extremely attached to technology, because they use it for their hearing aids, artificial limbs, and everything that lets them use a phone or computer" < (From @xanadian.bsky.social‬)