Mindless attraction, Mindless repulsion reduction. Gambling and the desire machine.

Tension 》 release/interpassivity which is the point of fictional entertainment in its brute reductionism, applied into dominion and monopoly over the social media.

I bet, with all the hackneyed work of what is deemed hackneyed now with circularity farmed for shareholder fixation, do we see it.

Desire machine that entertainment designs.

Essay of addiction by design, or compulsion.

1:09 hour

What a sensation, motor operations made unpersuasive, that's the hope for the effort.

Careless Leftovers

Its bally creep.

The bally to call attention of short attention. Careless moments of things that are speak.

Little leftovers have from the crypto creep and desire for converting it from the most naive. This is what is leftover, with all the careless things getting more and more careless with less and less curation.

Left and sold. Left and sold. You are the product.

Hourly media game, professional =/= personal

The problem with certain trends that if you don't follow them you get ostracized. Such as a hoopla and the Pokémon phenomenon.

I will probably be missing out on the hourly Comics so I could only do a joke, not like it barely worked or had any traction. The surprise you pay to do something new.

Everybody talks about Brand even though it's not really a replacement for having a personality, one that talks as an end of itself.

Hitting specifications isn't a replacement for a personality.

So I miss this cargo cult, most likely for the better. Could not even understand it.

Not sexualising Jaimes trans Medicalism

Position Revised with following council of Geeks essays, opinion of him varies.

As a cisgender man, who's gay. Reading testimonies via trans, expecting solidarity with representation within their entertainment.

Listening to other trans in regard to the representation, such as council of geek.

Some don't seek medical intervention when doing transitions, with their medical scars and transitions being fetishes being not the answers, whatever the case. Their feelings matter and deserve a platform going forward.

Learn something new everyday. I'll learn more nuances as I go along.

Pretentious Hack

Who'd you trust? The honest hack or the pretentious one who calls himself and artist, wanting his tantrum taking seriously. 

The taxi driver who delivers, delivers you weird yet still on the point, or the one somewhere different where it completely does not work. Believing him the 'artist'? Despite the creativity being a liability.

Such is a retrospective of Doug Walker's the wall, the review that labour'd a risky commercial expression. It's bad.

Other that the complete contradiction of it being a love letter, along with the lack of an attempt of a soft sociological point of view being expressed. Because its comedy, contradiction for amusement? Or not..

I'd care for the inconsistencies if this was such an insult to a work of art. It was a literary endeavour, Doug's was, unintentionally.

no. There are plenty of reviews on the pretentious review, that you may have seen. He won the race to the bottom.

Understanding popular publisher spec

The specifications left behind by popular publishers aren't necessarily better, but they are well liked for their well likeness. (Boorstin Complaint 1992 image magazine. Well know for his well-knownness.)

It's exposure still, overexposure from the Cthulhu effect from empiricism of the market.

Search the reasoning comma specifications making a machine of a vendor that is most untouching, do a mistake the machine from the Artists as our complications fold.

Merely that's what social mass advertising wants, to be universally liked within the c-suite that shows a single number going up.

 

What a short term system it is. Only organized commune way will go out.

My feelings with the pokemon base

Skintilla, One of the Twitcher streamers who are couched. Now for my feelings. Oil pastel paintings bring me back.

I have been the most jaded kid, and I have been the most enthusiastic kid. Fandom and hated does that to ya, let me tell ya. Ambivalent-dom? Nah, My relations are alright now.

What am I to do with the most commercial property, with the popularity of the publisher leaving high SEO and cease and desist letter within its wake. Nintendo itself not being a friendly business when it comes those who love the franchise. What a love-hate relationship.

Back in the mid 1990s I was chirping “Clefairy” As a young'un, I was making silly games with the Pokémon and role-plays with a teenage, now today it's gone with all the time.

There's no denying of it's impact with the culture, even with its commitments and ideas reflected with the modding of other monster-trainers within the action genre. With its own trace into the card-trading scene which someone in my family does disclose unpacking on a streaming service, what a market.

Right now, a pack for something to be opened, with a surprising act.

Hearing about this overcommercialisation of this merchandise. It's no surprise though.

Matt and Trey have made a tiring satire of how overcommercialization it is, and I can only resonate so much. Since Children's media will always be more commercial than adult stuff. That's simple arthritic. Jaded as I was back being a kid, it's now time that my engagement cannot be serious over such harmless fun. (Got the that clip of a long essay of chinpokemon From those ambulance chasering writers. (WW2 Reference cw, If I could make an essay of those tired writers.)

Since to such with the over-exposure and the familiarity, so the dignity began to dissipate with the poke-hunk community, brushing with many a controversy as the lack of structure as let us be like this.

That's what fandom is, It's not an amorphous blob to nitpick with, only through the little pit could civil conversation of the entertainment product could be had. It's been friendly enough. Hopefully they are critical of inequitable business practices to help melt the scepticism.

This mysticism of what is our fandom will still remain, and it's time we acknowledge the scepticism. Of our, what will be done with our cultural remnants of this big empire will have to be made into something new, without their eyes. They will be pin-up artists making them alternative versions down under, whether that it's prosumerist meta or not. I reserve my contention with the big-publishers, rather than the freelancers.

Expect to see more, and for those making something new. Block out it's noise if it ain't to your taste.- We are the fragments of the SEO and impressions made afresh. Collecting ourselves into new communions.

(Oh, the poke-hunks are better than whatever Nintendo publishes, fight me on that. Poke hunks spin-off? My favourite Graphic novel by Bryan Tybalt was based on Sherlock Homles.)

Thank you twitch for the paradoxical name

 I'm a mixed man about it.

Made the difference towards a Llama to a Couch.

With irony failed I felt the most tension with imposter syndrome, then I didn't manage, then I broke down and restructured right back up. This was my entertainment persona.121212

Transactional relationships, Fair weather Mutuals

All Vendors? Prosumer relationships.

Prosumer relationship everywhere.

Up and down. Constant commercial creep, constantly unrelenting.

All specification and no expression makes couch a hollow artifice

All specification and no expression makes couch a hollow artifice, that's what it feels. Game and player passionless cheapness.

All specification and now expression makes a couch a hollow artifice, perfunctory tastelessness that is checked out.

Grooming the metrics. Following smoke and mirrors. Into puffery of software static.

All, make me distress, stress.

Off for now. At least creativity and art remains.

Because perfect ain't the point, the work on spec ain't the point, don't make it the point.

Community of practice/Community of convenience

Unfortunately, hustlers have hijacked the term of commune, to make things of convenience and motivator being lured into the trap.

Copy-performers of status and affiliation, all for the interruption advertisers are adding to inundation. They're asking and hustling for it. Every moment to be converted into a measurement, lost without notice.

Everybody's too busy hustling for the next SEO event, such a game is an act is futility. Something I can afford to avoid, certainly deserving of humanity. Yet not my beeswax. Energy is the serviceability.

Too busy being a gas station, when it comes to direct response platforms, a gas station with trophies. (Quoting that from Stephanie Sterling.)

The praxis is ill-founded on a set of axis, and getting better at a feedback loop of feeding an algorithm. Not my problem if that's the game they want to play.

Guess with the few who want to enrol along with the ride, and not let others be absorbed by the pretentious mass media rush is going to be the course.

20-30 min read on communities of convenience , by Cory Doctorow. With cussing.

It's more IP than community. The certain dragon I critiqued earlier falls in the category.

Deontological Division

What can be an excuse or not an excuse to selfishness?

How many hoops do you have to jump through to meet the minimum viable audience and to show the work?

Somebody said something about to each their own. Yet when it comes to community, a difference between a fair-weather and an all weather friend is a matter of what it takes to display mutuality. Communal spaces could suffer from too much One-up-manship from all the amount.

With the blips of transaction and the intrinsic data, things move, though. Territoralism still lives.

(Going to refrain from copy'n pasting certain takes until ideas float along.)
Kim Myatt⁷
‪@ysvyri.bsky.social‬
"You don't owe anybody anything, especially people trying to bully you with moralising. Making process videos and streaming is time consuming and sometimes feeling "watched" hurts the creative process. This take only hurts artists."

Altough such a matter of deontological division is a matter of means when it comes to selfishness, could be taken the point of Ayn Randian selfish objectivism. (Who plagiarised a lot of philosophy by Nietzsche )

Individual Exceptionalism

"You're special, just like everybody else." Or so the saying goes.

Merely being unique and remarkable, a pioneer, does not mean you'll survive. Survival still an excuse, a product/service not worth preserving.

Having to make gruelling copy of high trending SEO topics, groomed to capitalized for an attention retention of an algorithm decided to appease them, and not the end-user. Such the wiling call of what is unique that is only going to be a point of tension that will not be leaded.

Only with the smallest amount of connection shall there be a light to understanding that the things that count, and the things that don't with this each of use in our selfish hideouts, lead out into a generous community.

Such a point.

The dissappeared blogs, From monetised whispers.

 There are "meta" blogs, trying to game the algorithm, or attempts for dominion and failures, like cheating and such.

Now it's gone, with writing things to be made into the robots, then there are gone, deleted. Files of information that are left into the wastes of lost-media.

Creativity for creativity's sake ain't celebrated, there are left to rot into the forgetfulness of our times, lead into a most profanely disservice that's made into emptiness.

Yet all of this time. That all this task to be made with a priceless intent, one that is to push forward and honour a desire to give our own selves to aid others.

So yes, do go and make an honest living, that living shall not enclosed with the little spindle of creativity that come forth here.

I'm not monetizing this.

Specification of desire

 

Antitheses of representation, aren't we?

Weather on attempts on deciding which and wherever specific to our own manners, it is all guided. Guided in the way that is into the intense of marketeers. Profit mongers, where rats in the maze are prodded with little tips of pleasure.

So it is, forever the race to the bottom. I'm sure they justify it in their mind, despite harder to emphasize.

That's not to invite the antagonism of the wall of scepticism we all face in our duty to lead or sacrifice all self-determination to the subservience of the dollar.

Searches the Dominion under such measurement. Too big to care.

(Another rant, merely seeing lack of curation)

Copism, metric hallucination vulgerisation.

Eternally locked in chasing high SEO in hopes for the magic dragon. Me-tooism. Into reification and the vulgarisation.

That's the swirl of the vulgarisation, that is the material, with so-so towards the rule 34 with it. It really is the capitalisation of trends.

Memetic do these eyes explore us. Copying a success repeatedly in hopes that it will come back again.

Thats familiarity, that's proven, that's the same packaged woopity.

With no understanding.

That's okay, it will never get better. It's the same metric hallucination of pop media that comes around, stays. Commercialism of sexual formalism. 

Ultimately harmless and of corporations I shouldn't defend.

Performative Affliation, Underhanded Games. Desire for direction.

 You'll never know the direct games within the performance metrics unless you know the full record.

Many indie publishers working on the public side play the metrics, feed the algorithm, then try to save face by talking about how to excuse them.

Rachel Hollis is a perfect example, all the inspiration porn advice in the world yet does not hide the face that he married to leverage from Disney entertainment and then went to organising parties with celebrities.

We will never know if we use direct communication such as impack copywriting to make others more honest.

It's not all fun and games.

Editing Commercial sinkhole

All this Meta

All this 'Powerscaling'

All this 'Practice' Of a system that's making supple and demand that's broken with a platform that refuses to add any curation. All part of the course with learning to be sceptical of performance metric advice.

It's like a carsoul, around and around. Status and green grasses behind, yet it's never that simple.

Performance metric advice, any craft. Is quickly populated and then left again.

It's called social, status, and affiliation are now gamed for interruption advertising, not craft media. Really is a sinkhole. Power scaling to metrics is imponderable and incomprehensible.

'Scuse my rant.

Amusement carasol

 Laughter loops that take us. There's reason that those whose profession in amusement don't deserve respect from other professions. Since amusement cannot work within law, health and financing.

Such is a natural property of the communicative medium, the message of the medium won't be learned from a book rather than a cartoon TikTok

Clowning for the sake of clowning, cleverness for the sake of cleverness, buffoonery for the sake of buffoonery. Such a way that goes around and is the silly status roll that goes nowhere. The publishers and it's trail of SEO, of the status that follows the most and leads to nowhere.

If that idea leads to new ones, that so be it.

If there's no direction and only amusement, then that's a warning sign of the narrative at play.

Amusement ain't resistance, not the "need to laugh or you'll cry", it has character like the rest of it.

When copywriting/business negotiation, don't amuse and communicate.

Cruel Clown show

What a show that will others believe they're owed entertainment. Owed amusement, owed kiddie pool play.

Such is a means that will never end, of large waves of attentions economies that will move in and out, with much whimsy.

Fame, Infamy, and Attention Economising. It all happens at once, performance metric hallucinations shake like winds. Commercial platforms yearn for it, long for it, and call for it.

Now, I shall quote, as we go through this circles.

Dyna Soar 

"One of the worst things that can happen to an artist is becoming unintentionally famous on the internet. Nobody is in control of it, and when it occurs it’s a completely destructive force that endangers you and your work due to the nature of the majority of people online. The macrolevel behavior of social media is sick and twisted and directly/indirectly pursues the suffering and torment of others as entertainment Doesn’t seem to matter if you “embrace” momentary celebrity or not. It will punish you, hunt you, grift off you, and make up stories about you regardless. There is a sense of entitlement from the viewer that they are owed entertainment constantly from you. That all work you do is immediately “open source”, available to anyone, and ready to make a buck off of. Any rejection of this is considered elitist and antisocial, and the acceptance is considered “selling out”. You can’t win and in general, nobody I know that has had the spotlight thrown on them really wants that. We all know it’s horrible."

If you haven't already, you can look of Signifiers in documentary of the entertainment industry. Or, with how social media is treated like one.

FD signifer 1:12 with racism content warning.

This is free*

 *Yet you are the product with the moment you engage with this platform

*Our User Interface will trace Interaction costs and lead you into the analytics designed to make you feel less status.

*Our ads will frustrate you with each preceding interaction like network television

*User Interface will frustrate with the desire to sell performance metrics with payola.

*Feel fomo or jomo within the popular IP/fandom crowds

*There are certain celebrity, influencers, content creators (not naming names ) That are as bad as the publishers they criticise. That reinforce the age of scepticism.

Forseeing the feedback loops and systems in place is what will be what I want.