Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Hobbyist media theorist. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
The show must go on, and the show must go on, and the show must go on.
Yet I know being a host I'm going to move one as with my own means.
Or should I do ruthless expose, revealing the truth, go for ideals? What is a host going to do when the issues hit close to home and you have to make a stand? All rhetorical.
Ideology, materialism. I can't understand call-outs these days within political action and then there are the entertainers who happen to dazzle away and do not care, yet with the creation of slop, with understand. Silly waves of attention, silly waves of attention.
Ah, This will never be a call-out, only a dismissal channel. Like I left Anita Sarkeesian, and others, I simply moved on with the push and pull of belief systems tugging me in different directions.
Entertaining hosts and an editorial call-out artist, an essayist who tries to make some better of the slop, With it although, they can only say that the show must go on. Welp, we are going to be living with provocateur bait and panic averages stuff.
Oh, and there's a link to the Clanker slur discourse, which is a silly hilly to die on. Yet another reason why some mis-foundherent ways of social media discourse can't be taken seriously. Despite the adultism, the discourse has got, naive, coarsened thanks to the media. Thanks internet. White people hijack everything.
"I don't want to die on this hill. I think this is hill is dumb. I don't even want to be on this hill. I don't think this hill should exist. I have just found it impossible to ignore."
""Presumably they imagine that this will only ever hurt people who are inordinately attached to technology. Unfortunately, disabled people tend to be extremely attached to technology, because they use it for their hearing aids, artificial limbs, and everything that lets them use a phone or computer" < (From @xanadian.bsky.social)
(Since I've decided that economic downfall is going to continue to get more incredulous, I'll decide to do my own research. More commentators are referring to "Bubble" in quotations.)
(I guess, even with the pre-conceptions and fundamentalists view I'm not a fundamentalist btw, I'm going to leave this one, hopefully they'd use this info reasonably and responsibly. As I'm typing this there are more commentary on the Sora video thing that I'm not going to further comment, not my job.)
Noting and responding to these events is what journalist does with editorial control. Seeing another silly spectacle of narratives in the west always baffles me as I try to evaluate one of the hobbyists here.
Hmmmph, Yep, not going to pop according to this Reuter's article, yet, I know it has not done honest reporting before, yet I trust it here (There was an reporting error within another geopolitical thing that I forgot.)
Okay time for another opinion piece, non-fiction, yep I only write for those who don't tire of it. TBH, nobody on microblogs can read this long anyway, so this is a tactical choice on my part.
This is better at envisioning concepts of the current discourse of AI, thanks, I'll take that positioning axiology. Another collection of notes as I research this technological determinist. ( This is according to him, I'm copy-pasting it. So that there is a clear discussion. )
Written before with my journalism that it's all about seeing what I can do to help out.
That's what copyright is btw, a state-sanctioned monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us. Yes, that's what I do with siding with the creative commons in terms of keeping the internet an open host. So it's a statecraft decision to say that it empowers publishers/publicists too much. Treating them as arbiters, not punishing them.
Copyright is the stuff publishers take from us when we go viral with a book deal, taking 95% percent of the profits once virality hits randomly, that's piracy! (Spoke like Bopkin Cappy there.) It's a publishing right, not a creative right like freedom of expression and assembly.
Yet here we are, having to pick allies, or be passive with this reading.
This propertarian manner, though, I have to reject it. An ascension on of such a legal fiction to a creative rights will have to do.
I've been trying to build bridges with diplomacy, because y'know what entertainers do is to not send death threats and continue to host a world of wonder. Guess those who serve of giving up their copyright to publishers have put me on the naughty block list, or I'll guess they'll do what I want with toxic positivity, statecraft correctness. I'm in complete agreement with Andy these discourses have become too erm, skirmish for me to keep track.
I'll have to fight for my autonomy within certain talking points that invade even the most reputable sources, stuff that I cannot trust now. (Water is a silly metric.) Could honestly do a libertarian socialist solution to all this ai-talk.
Youch, Look at those numbers.
Somebody wrote that the left (or, what I call the troglodyte left, or derogatory slur left) is built on performative bullying (Callout culture) and smug certainty (String Theory like what physicists say), Yet this subject still has that, non-certainty. So take that for what you will, it's only found on Twitter.
We're going to have to be diplomatic, or ignore it entirely. No point at romantising 2022 or even before NFTs, as with things, they're not so simple as a twitter 140 character count.
Deciding to not associate with anti or pro, or synth, I merely keep tract because to pick a side could lead into some opportunistic hurdles. However, I still resonate with the existential naturalism that I had during my atheist days, (still do) so now reading and commenting on such blogs, it's been helpful thought fodder.
I'll be keeping track of the info with this podcast on analysis with, Sam Harris?? Oh, he ain't ranting about muslims, hmmph. Welp, will document. It's called the last Invention.
I may describe myself as a Preparationist, i had the Misrablism of Doomerism in this discourse.
For the sakes of interpretation, This visualisation model includes all interpretability of the models with explanations. Well, all reinforced that this lacks free will with pre-determined indeterminacy going into a gradient descent of probability.
(Maybe it's a homage to a comic, oh no, well, another way to not trust micro-bloggers. Slop + Taxonomy makes the discourse. Inspired by the contaxomy from quote mining.)
This is journalism slop to begin with. Amanda herself called these content hot-dogs rather than alchemy.
In the ludo-primordial soup of our subconsciousness of the play of our media, there's the struggle that existence since the dawn of time, it's our slop.
Appeal to composition ( oh boy, the fallacy lover isn't I, don't worry I do hate the argumentation that happens.) I can show if things are applied to new meaning. My Atheist was meant to do logic it with fallacies, even there were argument with others of fallacies a multiplying in every way. Oh, Can't compete with that infinity of fallacy.
Misquotes and quote mining, and the mountains out of molehills complex. Maybe due to the shortage of my impressions, with it quickly going out of my head, it's exiting my head. I'm not responsible for every little shock box when within twitter it happens to be another false, moral panic.
We know we are averages, and the unique commodity fetishier is the one that's made with all the things out of the way, yet with commentary non-fiction there's this aggressively average in the hopes of collecting views and impressions for the way, everybody's doing it, it's the social media doing its thing. Context collapse.
ICYMI Flazfire happened to do a video on this, yes, theres B-slur at the end which i don't personally use, no, I don't want to elaborate.
I'd need to filter this out, and it's not unique yet exasperated by ai, (It's become kitsch.) Welp, I'm a honest slopper; I do entertainment, I don't lecture. Yet even lectures are sloppified into a slush as Flazfire has pointed out.
Everything compact and its commitments are made into nothing, into a middle autonomy to try to do it. Welp, can't compete with it, not ai, not human, it's the publishers and the platform hosts that lead it. Moral panic slop, Seo Slop, Advertising slop, averages, always averages that are made sufficient with a workflow of today. Such is the age of information. We happy mutants will know about it as the masses play with it in their droves.
Guess with this age of cool-hunting an individualism, it's become more evident to come through. Even with the explosive element of radicalism and opposition, that negates meaning. We have been warned, and we are in it, from Harlan Ellison calling it out after rejecting the guild and the regressive elements of unions. To elsa-gate and today.
To add more, and to contrast it with the evergreen stuff. Here's a definition from this on slop. Welp, it's 20 min read, and it's got an examination of its relationship with the phemonon, and, what Sam Altman has released.
"Let's start with the intuition. What is slop?
Slop is written to pad the word count. Slop is when you procrastinate on your college essay and crap something out the night it's due. Slop is the logical conclusion of chasing the algorithm. Slop is the distilled extruded essence of the Id. Slop is when you have a formula and stick to it. Slop is when you can guess the exact minute in a police procedural where they find the killer because it's the same in every episode. Slop is when the k-complexity of the generator is low enough that you can infer its pattern. Slop is eating lunchables every day at school until you puke. Slop is when a measure ceases to be a good target. Slop is the 12th sequel to a superhero movie. Slop is generated from the authors prior without new thinking or evidence. Slop is Gell-Mann amnesia. Slop is in distribution. Slop is when the authors purpose for writing is money. Slop is a failure to say anything interesting. Slop is what you find at the bottom of the incentive gradient. Slop is a deeper simulacra level than it purports to be. Slop is vibes."
Plus, he recommended this video that's evergreen, even if I'm not interested in music making, I found it fascinating of creative software, as a bonus.
Double Bonus links!
https://simulacro.co.uk/introduction-to-slop-studies/ Somebody did a dissertation on the AI branch growth, Even though I find contradictions within the concept of encruddification, there has potential with the concept of epistemic crisis and collapse. Welp, Copywriters doing financial computationalism (David Oglivy) and the culture industry,
Oh well, it's the media. Insensitivity and sensitivity via smaller formats and there sardines only give you sardine responses.
Pick the format, pick the innards, pick the day and through selection.
What is the content that with the circle of life with all these sensitivities are to be made for another time, coherent lines, then they spindle into many shocks.
The reporter got shot by the entertainer and here we go again
There was a comparison with that place compared to a containment dome, with explosions of information, I don't know if I've been on a landmine, there are people detecting and finding out.
My investigations, yet at time. It's happened with the political, statecraft and all that jazz. Yet autonomous entertainment base their interactions on the state-craft and try to minimise it, it, regardless, ripples.
I..
I will only post a collage of my mini-essay here, since it's the only thing I have right now, I'm not sure if I'm ready to post the full post, a day, and sleepless existential nights trying.
(Cw: Callousness) In reflection with the other post, thinking verbally rather than visually has really given me a new perspective on this issue.
Sometimes, battle ain't worth it, with the recent witch-hunts I keep seeing.
Nobody wants to hire an abuser. Lifes too short. Against professional entertainment etiquette. Callousness, or disillusionment, regardless, holier than though with such a perception.
I can understand why that'd microbloggers leave an information exchange. PowerPoint, where the discourse is out of context and with screenshots of little things where correlation those not cause causation, with drive-by science.
Micro-bloggers that is in within Twitter and Bsky.
Welp, the masses want their entertainment with this, so it's only this that will fit it. Prosumer as it were, the mass's one that we'll get.
Oh no, I use meme, how ironic, huh? Prosumers man, prosumers.
10 months ago, with its updated journalism defer Alex Avile/Cory Doctorow with regard to the copyright/environment (Andy Masley) and others, I think this was a touchstone from somebody who ain't academic looking from the outside in. "Aggressively bright light to how hive-minded and dumb" ahh Flazfire. Anyway, I'm going to be more recluse and not post this on the micro-bloggers.
(Got to give credit, here's the tweet he's referenced) Why I don't go on Twitter. Or what outsiders looking inside are saying. Is this what trolls think who poison the well? Oh, had to credit the guy here's. Here's another video that could be, I'm thinking being a visual-minded person having to integrate within verbal thoughts. Here's a summation of the discourse back in 2012, and it still continues.
I guess with the moral panic slop I have to wade through, I'll see if I can keep this off microbloggers because of lack of citations. Trucking through incoherence and weirdness. (This ain't bloobergum kind of thing.)
tired sketches (cw: politics, it is a editorial, editorials and essayist tend to be more directly political. Oh well, tension'n all.)
Typographical mind
Cinemagraphical or Televisional mind
Now it's the Microblogolocal mind. We've reached a new level.
Ology, as patterns of addiction connect with the media of the message, and the ways those messages are distorted and shortened into talking points.
Guess I'll drive this point home with Sunnichee, from Neil Postman, to others in regard to minimising engagement of the fast-food info scroller. The information age is vast.
Sharing this old fitness YouTube by elite fitness, His endorsement of 3 favourite YouTubers of Mike Isratel is outdated, yet its relevant
Since they're a informal group looking for a fun little mockery of performative high school dynamics. It's easier to follow such a mentality, of which it is.
Yet it's all a status role game too, which is high, which is pretentiously high to laugh at to release tension with anti-drama? Or do we gag at, which controversy it is to follow to be part of the in-group, which is to be excluded? Where is the line.
All rhetorical questioning as where the friend group unpredictably goes and win's the viral lottery.
Hunting packs, I don't know what to know about them. Mob Manipulation is something that ain't
So don't bet on the scarce chance of going viral and then sponsorships.
I think of this quote when it comes to popular/unpopular with celebrity, not breaching certain rule-of-laws with others.
"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection." Neal Boortz
It was the last quote that was quoted within the atheist splits years ago.
Gore rips, warning of a parody while it's an above the grade, it's still a parody channel. Guess he's bit the apple and I hope he plays with genre, subscription model and something not-parody/satire.
Welp, that's social media of VElma.
3:44
"I'm meta!"
"Ugh"
So that's the notion of all of this, the Meta was being pursued by mass media for the age of time, and I don't work it, it's always focused on meta, Most efficient tactics available, that's what this Intellectual property of mass media rely on, It's where they get hermeneutics of multiple interpretation, logos of money, erotics of holistic qualitative.
Or that's how it will be.
I can see the tension, right? All social media precipitation, can't turn it off.
All of this and all of that simple and clear dichotomy.
(Anders Brevick of lone wolf)
Ah, the times I was an existentially hanging on 14 years ago, back when I atheism was a matter of talks and video logs of philosophical pondering were a thing, this may not be completely true.
What an artefact, it was the seeds of what was the 2016, then it was a next time.
People bring and try to litigate victims, arbitrarily, non-sequitor. Hard determination still lingering, some people can't be helped.
It's why I'm not a gamer.
People are self-reflecting, people are moving on. I'm moving on, Good.
Dogmatic circles, such things, go in circles informally to help us through the day like breathing air. Yet at such a time when an argument that it's going to happen with arguing with a gender denier. There's something about it that they simply don't want to listen, to see if they are arguing within bad faithed troglodyte.
That's the problem with such a matter, they are either trying to argue from a fundamental precept of informal groups within thick tanks and so forth.
Since trolling and spamming will exist since the internet follows through, it's a matter to know how much we are products to our social media sites with these bad actors, or the tantrum industry complex is being fuelled. It's not a matter of childism, adultism, and maturity, it's seen the gap of illiteracy that challenges our own ways of seeing.
Arbitrary contradictions and inconsistency lead into another turn. Preach to the own choir here.
Nope, I don't think this covers psychosis, it's reminding me of the way atheists accused theists that they are crazy. This was refuted, and it's not going to happen. The insane asylum ain't coming back.
No no no, let's not try and bring the insane asylum back. With the method being in the madness.
Moving past of the Victorian insanity accusations, we are to make it our pursuit to see how we can decipher and see mental illness and disability as a thing to go with, and that means AI too.
I could point out a bunch of men and suits with money as a bunch of freaks, yet that does not go to the heart of ideological and material conditions. It's going to get unhistorical.
Eschatology, End times have been with us all this passages, Yet's that associated with all cults like Scientology and bebops comet. Including, I must say, Atheism science fiction.
I'm being overly meticulous for a point, to the point of calorie tracker.
Bearnards boop animation
Current day on Thursday, last day of July. Unreliable work tracker got from this post, with thoughts.
Two fat Monstys -8hrs from idea board 5hrs?
Scar's portrait
-8 hr 31 on pinups of Jon On Plaza.
Double spread's within adult works Frog F'd minus the 33 h
Cover
End cover pinup. These are moments I have done after my workout schedule 5/2 week. Apparently. Even if I cut back on volume.
The lord's ram splash pages.
My blog pages (some of them lost as I deleted the doodles as I was done) Total collective time.
Look it that, my vertical blog doodles are even more inconsistent.
Another with my pinups. Last time it was five hours, it was typing up in m blog.
Sometimes I type in my phone, I read while walking, does that count? Reading for pleasure, reading for essays to learn a thing or two,
ugh, felt most tired with this one
This was all the industrial tradition of scientific management by Taylor. Yet I cannot determine or take it seriously, there's only a long succession of mise-en-place and the little.
Then the physical coaches like Eric helms with auto-regulation, fatigue management and deloading with workload sensitivity. That's not even touching on the work, and it's ontological characteristics that It could be questioned. Anti-work and the Burnout society with the virtue of uselessness.
Yet ho ho, all these work hours. They're all so arbitrary.
It's going to take a lot of unionizing and atomisation that will take on the industrial burnout machine, that's already displaced us.
Oh, and remember Ashton Hall's morning routine, there's this thing that it was pure advertising, and it's race to the bottom because it's become a commodity now.
Bragging on social media labour power has become advertisement now, and the cobra effect of that has seeped into it. They
I'll put a gag routine here.
Even with the work hour laws and such. They are not reflected with the advertisement for these kinds of motivational TikToks. Unethical advertisements driven by response rates and audience capture.
This applied latterly with my programming of artwork has been better, so I'll share it.
I wonder what the growth tubers on social media are doing? Stuff that does not work. That course of trying to be one's own boss is still here.
Such a ceo-mindset of physcopoltic
Spams still spam, and advertisement led platforms are still entertainment platforms first, not fund-raising ones. Ad-creep is still ad creep, even with the infinity of the charity out there. International infinity.
Best know what limits.
This a reflection on influencer courses are garbage, here's why.
A lot of them are cropping up, trying to deterimine a cdp of commodity algorithm and market to feed, to makertise the unmarkerteriseable.
What a shame, maybe that thing of creativity and passion are internal and not verified like product are something, I dunno.
Television advertising ain't incompatible with internet, why?
Along with it's 90s origin, it was not meant to be like that. Designed for one to one with minimal video hosting.
Foundations on interruption advertising, with a platform especially without foundherentist lifeboat on the sea of the internet, it's a race to the bottom.
A rift of an internet and a mass marketer, the internet user, from world I inter was designed for a specific one.
People have written about it, Tim Wu and other ethicists to anti-consumerism. Tim Wu has written about it in with James William article being quoted. To saying the remote control is the first adblocker to exist. For the glamour medium, that's the one that draws in the most illiterate audience, and it's crowd.
(Not that bad movie when it comes with remote controls)
Brad Guiger says that using interruption is akin to the shooting oneself in the food, Stephanie Sterling has moved to Patreon as with DJs Like Isaac Varzim. Others remove ads entirely, and Full Moon Matinée has removed it entirely.
Predictions of where mass advertising is going.
. Will still remain, as with all axiological concern, is suspended to make it continue with advertising campaign. . Scepticism will still remain, any user who's based on the sole business model will have to make the sceptic feel right.
. Since it's not going to go away, Interruption advertisers will have to face that anarchists will continue to use it. That's always going to happen as they uncommercialise everything . Lack of clarity of using interruption advertiser can lead to downfalls like Ello . Advertiser-friendly and word-friendly words of babyspeak are and have contribute to adversial relationships . Scamvertisements, unregulated, irresponsible interruption advertising. The Faustian bargain with them is that there is arguably the biggest race-to-the-bottom compared to subscriptions and direct donations.
. As noted with Matthew Barthmolows Ad-creep, advertisers and mass media have been equivocating free speech with commercial speech.
That's merely some of the challenges, as people set up guardrails.
Even Robert Mckee's stated that interruption advertising is going out, with statistics moving towards subscriptions and direct transactions.
Where's the charity within the oxymoron, where fan art, community activity, advertisement and everything is translated into a heavy user (whale) activity, such.
To ignore such a working conditions without even realising on the nebulousness of sharing, and now we're struggling.
Got this word from Joleen Bloom, fascinating term with the gotcha games I've avoided, along with microtransactions. Cannot endorse that within conscious. Even if its Xxl Woofia.
There are going to be examination of the terms of work as a performance for somebody else in a new light, including of its antithesis of lazy once again, anti-work boredom and other ways reassembled of their definitions and to be idle then made anew again.
Incoherent, incongruent, inconsistent ideas are still ideas, to be remixed into something other.
Making the concepting regards to something that made, that's abundance/scarcity.
So to speak.
Don't know what to make the conceptual distinction and meaning, continue to plod through because abundance is going through what seems to the finiteness of scarcity and the abundance with is the many ideas.
With literature with, incongruity is used for dissonance effect of complex characterisation.
So take a parachute, welcome it for a moment when on the internet, shut it off.
Previously on Couch Gregor's ai editorals. Since I'm dissatisfied with all the editorials, I made my own.
Looking at the coco workflow, there's the usage of noding and shaders here like it's used within blender, with 3d models.
Huh, according to the questionable lawsuits there n has been ethical questions in regard to this, I've had to check what this will do for independents.
Looks like it will have to relax and into noding, with minimal text-to-prompt speech, I'm afraid such a matter will move towards no copyright infringement. The environmental concerns along with the labour is another matter.
I can still see some inconsistency here and there, i think it will.
The only answer to this will be to do another art piece.
Since copyright licensing laws aren't going to stop this ( Disney has been developing its out diffusion models for to replace to concept artists.. ) Such a matter that copyright infringement it out of existence, it's going move into ethical questions with regard to its use and not contingent on commercial publishing and industry.
Licensing politics! Yeesh. Have they slapped me with a copyright infringement from drawing an Aggron as a pin-up, perish the thought. I'm merely a content producer to them anyhow.
This book is on my audiobook list in terms of essays. So many coming out these days. Got the audiobook.
( Oh hint, my untested estimate is that I agree with 80% percent of the book, it's good at dealing with the transhumanist thought that's been erupting more within Silicon Valley and the saviour complex.)
With the rise of deepfakes will continue to occur, along with the
The age of scepticism is going to get more muddy. Herschel Gordon Lewis had a point with direct response rates
Disinformation campaign first, funding latter.
Going to have to boost this as such tech evolves, Fox Key did make a post that this will continue since films are the most labour-intensive and expensive forms that we take for granted. Including videogames, and such a licensing that will only move it underground, along with managing.
I'm not sure if we can out-license of with this will combine to some odd concoctions, I don't like this I.P loving people, (Even though I can imagine a system of resource redistribution not contingent on it, merely like how qualitative differences between a restaurant and a soup kitchen works. Does that make me a anarchist? Oh, well. )
It's not that the lowest common denominator word of content means the worst and the best. Bill Gates definition versus Martha McLuhan definition.
Welp, I'll have to keep track as these things unfold, and soul-searching will occur. This broad brush will see more erm, cases, so to speak. Both Industrialists and the silicon will be watched.
(Also it's copyright infringement, not theft, RFAA implanted that. )
