Slopulism, Populism, Poptism

Such are the terms of commodity consumption as of today and that line of mediocrity that is aspired to out of dejournment and recuperation, cycle out of cycle. Then there is a layer of that, the psychoanalysis of attempting to read for the hegemonic lands.

Such is fair use/fair dealing with it, leading into reflections that lead into new culture, a new feedback loop.

Some are at peace, some at war.

We will never hear the end of it.

Media critics = reading the dead

Despite the function of social media, what predates our own ways and thought patterns can be reserved us

Determine entire personalitys?

Yet with the predetermination of the tech, only with the sociological/psychological fictions can it be made to help serve, yet with that described desire of such a task, we are through with picking a pluralistic phenomenon of many minds coming into one space of social media.

How do you read that? How can it be read? Noise from the fuzz can only lead to distinction, then decision.

Silly monopolies of the front.
 

two types of DNF

As is one of lack of material time constraint.

One of lack of mental care, of the volume that's made Or Seth described impact.

Another is a lack of interest; it goes back to the idealistic ways of the terminology of marketingese, such as 'brand'. Along with the material manners with direct response.

Do you think Seth looked at all the smut and went 'wow' If you a/b test everything that you get from a porn site. Failing to elaborate on that, merely the banal nature of such is the spam and commodity, or am I looking in the wrong spot?

Even though it's fine to go that direction, even if there's not difference of the pin-up

Third reason could be a ragequit, those results may vary.

Agnostic non-curation

Oh, so what is it for the irrationality of the fundamentalness of the algorithm? Of prior recognition of a scroll that can be made into madness

I can determine the way it picks up the random matter; that's the definition of random, with no predictable fundamental, absurd to define by design. Fundamental candlesticks require a base.

So with this blind selection of organic traffic, be in it for the deal compared to an institution built around the copyright industry complex.

Once more, a trudge of the non-fundamental epistme of the realm.

Proscenium opening

https://billingblox.chargefield.com/

That impression in a world of billing boxes of post-commodity delight. Frantz Fanon called the forgotten the 'Black'. The proscenium, with the desire of the other.

With the need to reach complete entertainment of our satisfactions from Hegel. With these regressions and progression of direction of our arguments, it meant to show within the social media colosseum.

How is it that those conflicts and recollections, we are the centre of them?

Sometimes with a high-status market category, it's hard to fix. Can do what to do without the permission of groups.

Of the pretty good dissatisfaction of sex.

Still thinking about sex capital. Or a hopeful irony-maxxing from a pornographer who rambles. Along with the amount

Yet at this point, I lurk on Substack. I'm not sure the way of the defeatist hack way of egoism that I happened to have with the boon is defensible; sex sells, or until it doesn't.

Or is it that the spectacle sells? That's been as old as time, as old as play. As old as the caveman being able to dance before industry from agriculture.

It's becoming apparent that the intuition of the commodity. Or what.

"I'm merely doing what's natural and expressing my sexuality." Sure thing, do express complexity. Or, to conclude with this post, to utopia with heaven in denial of the metaphysics of it all. Common sense and intuitions will be around.

(Oh, Did he use beep_Boop? Idc now.Don't at me.)

Crowd pleasers

 

The crowd-pleasers and the polemicists behind a block.

It's time to know when to not pay attention to all in their backyard.

Such is the case with plenty of writers, illustrators, and freelancers in the realm of agnostic non-curation. Where judgement outside is seen from an agentic algorithm deciding who to see from the firehouse of potential relational nodes to connect and separate.

So, is the public again in disorganisation. Seems they will always be

The crowd pleasers.

"Don't act like a celebrity till your successful"

Ernie Bushmiller said that.

Is this what is meant by the internal theatres of seeing all these monopolies of traffic going by? 

Some get it, some don't, with stigmatised viewership. Lacking foundations and foundherent justification of the reason with the conclusion showing up on the feed.

An opportunity of conveniences of masses showing up like this. Not rhyme or following the law of non-contradiction. Although that's necessary to distinguish between coherence and incoherence, it isn't the core to live by.

So the ineffable mystery of getting a hit remains. Of the most relative things, the algorithm of the first empirical insight, not the understanding and wisdom it leads to underneath. Such a discovery beneath. Don't follow any growth-recursive YouTube channels, and learn direct response offers instead. Along with qualitative unmeasured cultivation. (or what the commercial firms calls brand) ]

React streams = enactivism

Enactivism is commodified, so that's why it will always have traction.

The most casual journalism there is, like this one, may not be the best, even. I don't know if I can reach that moment of passage. So they flow with all the time with metrics and traffic.

As with all isms, there is a mindset that precedes a philosophy of consciousness with the mind, with essays that I'm reading right now, even beyond the scope of the sociology of this.

So granted, these computational metrics computers use used to be a job; now it's a deal to lead a way that's ineffable and immeasurable. Or such that an irreplacable something within man makes it beyond such an essence granted with his natural expression. Yet we have our own sociologically and psychologically determined interpretations that intermingle.

So the immediacy and the emergent properties that I'm not proprietary at

(Further note, wow Seth Noted the computers where speeding up in 2017, even with his call to action to my least favourite book, Lynchpin.)

Confusionism

I guess the GoFundMe way of trying to bribe copyright extensions won't help protect small creators.

Not without the endless copyright trolls and all that. Oh well, guess I'll be ignored. It's a cautionary tale of being too terminally online.

That's the point with ulterior motives and motivated reasoning; I have it with myself with my own erotic intuitions. Yet I know that blind faith alone won't carry a good case.

Surrendering all stigma to the traffic metric

On the streaming services.

Fishing for attention, competing for it, warring for attention, for all to see.

Moral knowledge becomes falsity when the origin raises the pontificators' views the wrong way, and then they lecture.

With a product, service or policy, there's an incentive to lie, generally speaking.

Yet direct response, eliminative materialism, virality, celebrity endorsements – that stuff that I had to hide in the brand world of e-idealism.

Oh marketing, and the infinite regress of anti-marketing, how it manipulates, how it drives us. How it leads us. The lowest comprehension of a stratum.

The banality of diapolemics

So he is stuck, within statsis of all things that happen to bring him the torture of the cogs of the lands of wanting to be a anti-woke YouTuber nitpicking pop media's nitpicks.

The pundits have beeing going back and forth, I happen to this

It got me thinking of this link, of tackling infamous pundits for the sake of it.

Or the saying comes with the commodity relations to our intangible, qualitative attention.

🛋💭

Oh dear, we've reached the bipartisan hacksmanship of our entertainment nexus, pundits and PowerPoint punditry.

To what extent will these continue with this micro medium of the attention imperative? Everybody, to some extent, is copywriting and advertising to some extent in a contract propertrian.

trying to measure virality

The ideals travel without concrete form, unmeasurable concepts.

Often it's nothing; often it's everything. It's an external macro phenomenon of it.

Unable to grasp.

Confusion Matrix

Unrelated to a peanut calling another viewbotting, yet idk, what Seth says about cheating applies. Along with a dishonest game of publishing out there.

There's a machine learning term confusion matrix, or 'viewbotting service', and it includes spell checkers and the AI detectors not working.

So, even with the variables of all that. Cheating and all, the attempt to short-term to game and opportunities to race to the bottom are always present. Not going to deny. With the terminus of behavioural patterns aligning with thad

Ignore the vanity metrics.

status/situation of centrist status swirls

Hey, wanna be banal? Want to have no opinion? Want to be nothing?

It's easy money, a sinicure, a cush job.

Merely exist, then wait till death.

What's that? No opinion.

Well, that's what a clerk happens to do, or what happens with low self-esteem.

Sit on the fence, try to be proud, yet not, and take the commodification word too seriously with amoral patterns. There are hills to die on, and the one that claims and ontologises everything and nowhere on a base of solipsism arrives at nowhere, with an opportunistic meliorism with that mentality.

Oof.

on the lindy effect

The Lindy Law

Reading self-help advice of crafting crafter for craft. The way of the meta of meta. Self-referential.

WITH NO OWNERSHIP Welcome to the creative commons. Are you surprised?

So much intake of consumption of content with the way it's like it's got that way. Industry complex of condescension on the front page, or am I looking at the mindless entertainment in infront of the front page?

This is the best the place has to offer.

Then you have to protect your attention.

Then with manners it goes. To look in the other places.

Cruelly Eliminativeist and cruely Empiricist

look at all that logic and physics of what some may call business. if there is a physics to business, there is none in the qualitative side, or the burnt embers

Why I'm against it: it's not fun not having beliefs and sensations.

Crafting crafter of craft. Rather than the unique one. To the way that the origins of things aren't unique.

All that scientism is any ideological commitment and an attempt at universal appeal. Mindset of a production boolean value.

A job of bean counting. A job is a measure of the sunk cost of wrong measurement, of Pavlovian frameworks circulating into themselves.

Such is the status of old money and cool money.

Catechisms not contingent on

With talks going on and on, exchanges like that.

I wonder how many read and take literature and the formation of themselves and news through the oracles of experts. Then that way, through there insights, it will lead to a new turn of know-how, to being in the know.

The produce with the service to advertising.

With no contingencies, there is no need for any attempt of casualness; they all go and vanish away from the disposable chatrooms.

That 1%, out of a direct response. Could be oblivious, and that's okay.

Even the lonely ones leave on the Substack. Unable to sell a copy, the attention drought is with us. Either stuck in short-form video trying to get engagement.

Comparing it to a hamster wheel. Generating and accumulating raw datum of the insights landing randomly on.

Not all tantrums are worth it

Certain arguments are meant to continue, held in a circle of audience capture.

What's a self-referential feedback loop, self-contained? 

Thousands of curses, thousands of crys, thousands of going down the line.

Then there's really than real, or verisimilitude as the likeness of likeness; I prefer respect out of a duty fervour.

The lies, the truths, the ways that they weave when I curate and place a moment of reprieve.

Why do I tip down when I go round an ruminate? Then there's the moment where it's brought back, and I'm stuck within Parkinson's law.

There it goes, down, down and right the way around. I'm looking at something realer than real. Is that what consciousness is within the head of an impossible argument to transcend and to touch an abstract visualisation from the concrete reality? That's hyper-reality.

Not a touch.

Double lifes

The pornographic libertine Epithumos, and erotics of art.

merely post a transactional porn of sexual capital, Thanks 1dime, that's entertainment clerkism and that's all that bean-counting does. Oh well, It's like I'm taking part of that with my own typing and production of illustrations, gracing amongst commoditised, conventionalised norms of social media, yet it's a matter of understanding and being aware of it.

To create a double life of a jerk-off bubble.

Then there are the other curational accounts that are not straight up porn which help create culture, and they are helpful too; the sfw ones that do it about sensation and the phonomological account of one significant curator of freelance curation can add taste and direction to the culture that nurtures it.

Or the intellectual curated

Directly polemical, not apologising.

This may be where the satirists and direct market happen with demand and the react streamers who happen to move towards the amount of ideological driving and various positions.

As a sociologist, one mus curate that too.