Convienient eristics heuristics; The Commercial metrology trap

Once you see algorithms develop, you'll see how they think, through philosophy of mind.

You cannot unsee.

There monotizing meterolgy. The connectionism, then the grissere of a metaphysical labour, to the unpaid labor.

Parsimony/Plenitude

 This Simplicity on Stanford got me thinking.

The chatton anti-razor applies to the novels end product to did the explanation expander.help reveal with wine from the grape juice.

That's a fact that those oversimplifies from shorter and shorter of the evaporation of quick form content, it's merely another vessel to bring new epistemics to the aspects.

Chatton did the explanation expander.

"Whenever an affirmative proposition is apt to be verified for actually existing things, if two things, howsoever they are present according to arrangement and duration, cannot suffice for the verification of the proposition while another thing is lacking, then one must posit that other thing."

Wonder what he will do with short form tie-toker and microblogging heuristics, heuristic pilled, heuristic addicted, or heuristic minded, or without the expansive effect of the outside.

Then the time will come, when there is the shorter form, and the complex form

The sea army veteran that advertised this

Another lone novelist in my feed

On amazon with self publishing his marine stories.

It was a small time with his cup of joe, and i should have put his novels on his auto-reader.

No, the olds man gone away on my feed.

Another moment lost in the noise, i am noise trying to be distinct within this field of commercial law. Noisis becoming distinct.

Here We Go Again, lost another novelist.

It's so hard to get anything, including royalties and stipends, as one.

Then again, what a circular matter of holding a belief.

Another belief, another one.

Examination of the unwritten rules of attention

"All unwritten rules of social media regarding reaching out socially are fake and dumb, and are only upheld because maybe one or two people without boundaries rubbed the originator the wrong way.

Everyone is fishing for attention, and let no one tell you otherwise"

Odendo

Aetiology, there is indeterminacy of the algorithm, which is the means of production and the productive forces of the artisan class to reach status. With there epistemics being circular, of shifting coherent ism, of scaling and descaling of the labour agent. Searching for remarkability, polemics and eristics within a void of attention-less

Aetiology > epistemology > Teleology > Ontology

To a holistic way.

That's a lot of mereology for you. Hopefully no pedantic.

Don't contradict activists

 Yeah, activist flowing

Nothing I can't win like attempting to contradict anger. Anger and fear are irrational, and they are the things that you irrational cannot handle. It's the way things have been.

That one guy who wasted all his ten years on a drama farm

To the Japanese soldier fighting a war within WW2. 

There's stuff I can influence or entertain, along with all that. Something left back within the most critical case,

Back in 2016, back in 2023. Such is a legal wrestling match.

Then there are stragglers within the SEO, searching for an answer on moot points, thd opinion has been entertained and the negation is with grifting to a good or service dependent on the gift symbolic capital, or the reactionary capital.

Slopulism, Populism, Poptism

Such are the terms of commodity consumption as of today and that line of mediocrity that is aspired to out of dejournment and recuperation, cycle out of cycle. Then there is a layer of that, the psychoanalysis of attempting to read for the hegemonic lands.

Such is fair use/fair dealing with it, leading into reflections that lead into new culture, a new feedback loop.

Some are at peace, some at war.

We will never hear the end of it.

Media critics = reading the dead

Despite the function of social media, what predates our own ways and thought patterns can be reserved us

Determine entire personalitys?

Yet with the predetermination of the tech, only with the sociological/psychological fictions can it be made to help serve, yet with that described desire of such a task, we are through with picking a pluralistic phenomenon of many minds coming into one space of social media.

How do you read that? How can it be read? Noise from the fuzz can only lead to distinction, then decision.

Silly monopolies of the front.
 

two types of DNF

As is one of lack of material time constraint.

One of lack of mental care, of the volume that's made Or Seth described impact.

Another is a lack of interest; it goes back to the idealistic ways of the terminology of marketingese, such as 'brand'. Along with the material manners with direct response.

Do you think Seth looked at all the smut and went 'wow' If you a/b test everything that you get from a porn site. Failing to elaborate on that, merely the banal nature of such is the spam and commodity, or am I looking in the wrong spot?

Even though it's fine to go that direction, even if there's not difference of the pin-up

Third reason could be a ragequit, those results may vary.

Agnostic non-curation

Oh, so what is it for the irrationality of the fundamentalness of the algorithm? Of prior recognition of a scroll that can be made into madness

I can determine the way it picks up the random matter; that's the definition of random, with no predictable fundamental, absurd to define by design. Fundamental candlesticks require a base.

So with this blind selection of organic traffic, be in it for the deal compared to an institution built around the copyright industry complex.

Once more, a trudge of the non-fundamental epistme of the realm.

Proscenium opening

https://billingblox.chargefield.com/

That impression in a world of billing boxes of post-commodity delight. Frantz Fanon called the forgotten the 'Black'. The proscenium, with the desire of the other.

With the need to reach complete entertainment of our satisfactions from Hegel. With these regressions and progression of direction of our arguments, it meant to show within the social media colosseum.

How is it that those conflicts and recollections, we are the centre of them?

Sometimes with a high-status market category, it's hard to fix. Can do what to do without the permission of groups.

Of the pretty good dissatisfaction of sex.

Still thinking about sex capital. Or a hopeful irony-maxxing from a pornographer who rambles. Along with the amount

Yet at this point, I lurk on Substack. I'm not sure the way of the defeatist hack way of egoism that I happened to have with the boon is defensible; sex sells, or until it doesn't.

Or is it that the spectacle sells? That's been as old as time, as old as play. As old as the caveman being able to dance before industry from agriculture.

It's becoming apparent that the intuition of the commodity. Or what.

"I'm merely doing what's natural and expressing my sexuality." Sure thing, do express complexity. Or, to conclude with this post, to utopia with heaven in denial of the metaphysics of it all. Common sense and intuitions will be around.

(Oh, Did he use beep_Boop? Idc now.Don't at me.)

Crowd pleasers

 

The crowd-pleasers and the polemicists behind a block.

It's time to know when to not pay attention to all in their backyard.

Such is the case with plenty of writers, illustrators, and freelancers in the realm of agnostic non-curation. Where judgement outside is seen from an agentic algorithm deciding who to see from the firehouse of potential relational nodes to connect and separate.

So, is the public again in disorganisation. Seems they will always be

The crowd pleasers.

"Don't act like a celebrity till your successful"

Ernie Bushmiller said that.

Is this what is meant by the internal theatres of seeing all these monopolies of traffic going by? 

Some get it, some don't, with stigmatised viewership. Lacking foundations and foundherent justification of the reason with the conclusion showing up on the feed.

An opportunity of conveniences of masses showing up like this. Not rhyme or following the law of non-contradiction. Although that's necessary to distinguish between coherence and incoherence, it isn't the core to live by.

So the ineffable mystery of getting a hit remains. Of the most relative things, the algorithm of the first empirical insight, not the understanding and wisdom it leads to underneath. Such a discovery beneath. Don't follow any growth-recursive YouTube channels, and learn direct response offers instead. Along with qualitative unmeasured cultivation. (or what the commercial firms calls brand) ]

React streams = enactivism

Enactivism is commodified, so that's why it will always have traction.

The most casual journalism there is, like this one, may not be the best, even. I don't know if I can reach that moment of passage. So they flow with all the time with metrics and traffic.

As with all isms, there is a mindset that precedes a philosophy of consciousness with the mind, with essays that I'm reading right now, even beyond the scope of the sociology of this.

So granted, these computational metrics computers use used to be a job; now it's a deal to lead a way that's ineffable and immeasurable. Or such that an irreplacable something within man makes it beyond such an essence granted with his natural expression. Yet we have our own sociologically and psychologically determined interpretations that intermingle.

So the immediacy and the emergent properties that I'm not proprietary at

(Further note, wow Seth Noted the computers where speeding up in 2017, even with his call to action to my least favourite book, Lynchpin.)

Confusionism

I guess the GoFundMe way of trying to bribe copyright extensions won't help protect small creators.

Not without the endless copyright trolls and all that. Oh well, guess I'll be ignored. It's a cautionary tale of being too terminally online.

That's the point with ulterior motives and motivated reasoning; I have it with myself with my own erotic intuitions. Yet I know that blind faith alone won't carry a good case.

Surrendering all stigma to the traffic metric

On the streaming services.

Fishing for attention, competing for it, warring for attention, for all to see.

Moral knowledge becomes falsity when the origin raises the pontificators' views the wrong way, and then they lecture.

With a product, service or policy, there's an incentive to lie, generally speaking.

Yet direct response, eliminative materialism, virality, celebrity endorsements – that stuff that I had to hide in the brand world of e-idealism.

Oh marketing, and the infinite regress of anti-marketing, how it manipulates, how it drives us. How it leads us. The lowest comprehension of a stratum.

The banality of diapolemics

So he is stuck, within statsis of all things that happen to bring him the torture of the cogs of the lands of wanting to be a anti-woke YouTuber nitpicking pop media's nitpicks.

The pundits have beeing going back and forth, I happen to this

It got me thinking of this link, of tackling infamous pundits for the sake of it.

Or the saying comes with the commodity relations to our intangible, qualitative attention.

🛋💭

Oh dear, we've reached the bipartisan hacksmanship of our entertainment nexus, pundits and PowerPoint punditry.

To what extent will these continue with this micro medium of the attention imperative? Everybody, to some extent, is copywriting and advertising to some extent in a contract propertrian.

trying to measure virality

The ideals travel without concrete form, unmeasurable concepts.

Often it's nothing; often it's everything. It's an external macro phenomenon of it.

Unable to grasp.

Confusion Matrix

Unrelated to a peanut calling another viewbotting, yet idk, what Seth says about cheating applies. Along with a dishonest game of publishing out there.

There's a machine learning term confusion matrix, or 'viewbotting service', and it includes spell checkers and the AI detectors not working.

So, even with the variables of all that. Cheating and all, the attempt to short-term to game and opportunities to race to the bottom are always present. Not going to deny. With the terminus of behavioural patterns aligning with thad

Ignore the vanity metrics.