Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Hobbyist media theorist. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
Tribalism, other than the colonial implications. Has its own sparring of power.
Or what they say about informal groups. Status and governance.
Why is everybody thinking everything a trial to declare verdict on microbloggers?
Everything a villain? Everything a verdict. Complete in curiosity across with the microblogging mind, the amount of discourse is the take it in an amount, time to vary the way.
I'm seeing the reliance of willing misinformed opinions within the west. Relying on Ayn Rand, and now there are more pundits than every trying to out-do each other. Guess this is why we still have the academics.
As a general rule, don't bother if it takes a bibliography, since you got to stay in sync with oneself.
Mass commodified content designed for kiddies evaporates from my brain from how easy consumable it is, guess the big-wigs knew, doing some thinking. I can't remember a Mr Beast video.
Well, it's not for me. Kids do love it, Not going to Junophobia it though, this is a thing with social media though, everybody comes and run it down to the ground, from everypart.
Guess FlazzFire has gone the edutainment route and deciding on to be a comedian, taking the vulgarism with it and writing like Chuck Palunuik.
My fave part of this collage.
I'll keep following him. Cussy as it is, not as Academically rigorous. Welp, that's the problem with the plot/spectacle of Aristotle.
(There's a reference to gentilia storage.) Averages, I do not mind making a stream of consciousness response/reaction, yet at this time it's all meant to be forgiven. Time for another way.
You want to see a dead body?
Yet with all this computationalism, with Ai being the medium and the metaphor, it's now a claim ot explore this and how it's deplored. It's like we are in the stage of where with our media, it's becoming our metaphor with learning what it means to distribute our labour into our hands.
This content farm will continue and fix what is not broken. Delivering to their audience fast and cheaper, it's react-slop like them all.
Well, Thank you, Hume Is-ought gap, between exchange value and use value, and with direct response marketing and brand marketing in this age of information age.
Now for this version of this Post and forming a rant as I become kitsch like this post. This is my scribomania making another post to see if I can act out from this. Well, here's me looking into the lifestylism.
Human Sloppers, Ai Sloppers, anything that already fills the search engines. Stochastic Seo servitude. Well, Fwopman happened to say stochastic parrot, I do say with big content and Alexander Avile refutation, With the statistical inferences of deductive and inductive processes;.
Short term, self-absorbed seo cargo culting. Even with radical opposition, it becomes a dependence (Was Martin Heindigger to point that out?) Mmm, better be quiet with the Confuseopoly swindles.
It's doomerism cult. Short term and selfish, Welp, Like an advertiser.
So when if all the time to build a coalition firsthand, a tribunal of the others and important allies that can help satisfy the needs, and punish to fit the responsible course. They can be placed within trust.
So, with the cool-hunters, the cultural conservatives, There's only the right to the city that will remain
"You gotta slop it up! 🎶" This song is stuck in my head as I did not invite it, it's a deviation of you gotta pump it up from the substance
That's life huh, well, Sturgeons law of 90% is that there is stuff to ignore. Curation time! Curation for amelioration.
The show must go on, and the show must go on, and the show must go on.
Yet I know being a host I'm going to move one as with my own means.
Or should I do ruthless expose, revealing the truth, go for ideals? What is a host going to do when the issues hit close to home and you have to make a stand? All rhetorical.
Ideology, materialism. I can't understand call-outs these days within political action and then there are the entertainers who happen to dazzle away and do not care, yet with the creation of slop, with understand. Silly waves of attention, silly waves of attention.
Ah, This will never be a call-out, only a dismissal channel. Like I left Anita Sarkeesian, and others, I simply moved on with the push and pull of belief systems tugging me in different directions.
Entertaining hosts and an editorial call-out artist, an essayist who tries to make some better of the slop, With it although, they can only say that the show must go on. Welp, we are going to be living with provocateur bait and panic averages stuff.
Oh, and there's a link to the Clanker slur discourse, which is a silly hilly to die on. Yet another reason why some mis-foundherent ways of social media discourse can't be taken seriously. Despite the adultism, the discourse has got, naive, coarsened thanks to the media. Thanks internet. White people hijack everything.
"I don't want to die on this hill. I think this is hill is dumb. I don't even want to be on this hill. I don't think this hill should exist. I have just found it impossible to ignore."
""Presumably they imagine that this will only ever hurt people who are inordinately attached to technology. Unfortunately, disabled people tend to be extremely attached to technology, because they use it for their hearing aids, artificial limbs, and everything that lets them use a phone or computer" < (From @xanadian.bsky.social)
(Since I've decided that economic downfall is going to continue to get more incredulous, I'll decide to do my own research. More commentators are referring to "Bubble" in quotations.)
(I guess, even with the pre-conceptions and fundamentalists view I'm not a fundamentalist btw, I'm going to leave this one, hopefully they'd use this info reasonably and responsibly. As I'm typing this there are more commentary on the Sora video thing that I'm not going to further comment, not my job.)
Noting and responding to these events is what journalist does with editorial control. Seeing another silly spectacle of narratives in the west always baffles me as I try to evaluate one of the hobbyists here.
Hmmmph, Yep, not going to pop according to this Reuter's article, yet, I know it has not done honest reporting before, yet I trust it here (There was an reporting error within another geopolitical thing that I forgot.)
Okay time for another opinion piece, non-fiction, yep I only write for those who don't tire of it. TBH, nobody on microblogs can read this long anyway, so this is a tactical choice on my part.
This is better at envisioning concepts of the current discourse of AI, thanks, I'll take that positioning axiology. Another collection of notes as I research this technological determinist. ( This is according to him, I'm copy-pasting it. So that there is a clear discussion. )
Written before with my journalism that it's all about seeing what I can do to help out.
That's what copyright is btw, a state-sanctioned monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us. Yes, that's what I do with siding with the creative commons in terms of keeping the internet an open host. So it's a statecraft decision to say that it empowers publishers/publicists too much. Treating them as arbiters, not punishing them.
Copyright is the stuff publishers take from us when we go viral with a book deal, taking 95% percent of the profits once virality hits randomly, that's piracy! (Spoke like Bopkin Cappy there.) It's a publishing right, not a creative right like freedom of expression and assembly.
Yet here we are, having to pick allies, or be passive with this reading.
This propertarian manner, though, I have to reject it. An ascension on of such a legal fiction to a creative rights will have to do.
I've been trying to build bridges with diplomacy, because y'know what entertainers do is to not send death threats and continue to host a world of wonder. Guess those who serve of giving up their copyright to publishers have put me on the naughty block list, or I'll guess they'll do what I want with toxic positivity, statecraft correctness. I'm in complete agreement with Andy these discourses have become too erm, skirmish for me to keep track.
I'll have to fight for my autonomy within certain talking points that invade even the most reputable sources, stuff that I cannot trust now. (Water is a silly metric.) Could honestly do a libertarian socialist solution to all this ai-talk.
Youch, Look at those numbers.
Somebody wrote that the left (or, what I call the troglodyte left, or derogatory slur left) is built on performative bullying (Callout culture) and smug certainty (String Theory like what physicists say), Yet this subject still has that, non-certainty. So take that for what you will, it's only found on Twitter.
We're going to have to be diplomatic, or ignore it entirely. No point at romantising 2022 or even before NFTs, as with things, they're not so simple as a twitter 140 character count.
Deciding to not associate with anti or pro, or synth, I merely keep tract because to pick a side could lead into some opportunistic hurdles. However, I still resonate with the existential naturalism that I had during my atheist days, (still do) so now reading and commenting on such blogs, it's been helpful thought fodder.
I'll be keeping track of the info with this podcast on analysis with, Sam Harris?? Oh, he ain't ranting about muslims, hmmph. Welp, will document. It's called the last Invention.
I may describe myself as a Preparationist, i had the Misrablism of Doomerism in this discourse.
For the sakes of interpretation, This visualisation model includes all interpretability of the models with explanations. Well, all reinforced that this lacks free will with pre-determined indeterminacy going into a gradient descent of probability.
(Maybe it's a homage to a comic, oh no, well, another way to not trust micro-bloggers. Slop + Taxonomy makes the discourse. Inspired by the contaxomy from quote mining.)
This is journalism slop to begin with. Amanda herself called these content hot-dogs rather than alchemy.
In the ludo-primordial soup of our subconsciousness of the play of our media, there's the struggle that existence since the dawn of time, it's our slop.
Appeal to composition ( oh boy, the fallacy lover isn't I, don't worry I do hate the argumentation that happens.) I can show if things are applied to new meaning. My Atheist was meant to do logic it with fallacies, even there were argument with others of fallacies a multiplying in every way. Oh, Can't compete with that infinity of fallacy.
Misquotes and quote mining, and the mountains out of molehills complex. Maybe due to the shortage of my impressions, with it quickly going out of my head, it's exiting my head. I'm not responsible for every little shock box when within twitter it happens to be another false, moral panic.
We know we are averages, and the unique commodity fetishier is the one that's made with all the things out of the way, yet with commentary non-fiction there's this aggressively average in the hopes of collecting views and impressions for the way, everybody's doing it, it's the social media doing its thing. Context collapse.
ICYMI Flazfire happened to do a video on this, yes, theres B-slur at the end which i don't personally use, no, I don't want to elaborate.
I'd need to filter this out, and it's not unique yet exasperated by ai, (It's become kitsch.) Welp, I'm a honest slopper; I do entertainment, I don't lecture. Yet even lectures are sloppified into a slush as Flazfire has pointed out.
Everything compact and its commitments are made into nothing, into a middle autonomy to try to do it. Welp, can't compete with it, not ai, not human, it's the publishers and the platform hosts that lead it. Moral panic slop, Seo Slop, Advertising slop, averages, always averages that are made sufficient with a workflow of today. Such is the age of information. We happy mutants will know about it as the masses play with it in their droves.
Guess with this age of cool-hunting an individualism, it's become more evident to come through. Even with the explosive element of radicalism and opposition, that negates meaning. We have been warned, and we are in it, from Harlan Ellison calling it out after rejecting the guild and the regressive elements of unions. To elsa-gate and today.
To add more, and to contrast it with the evergreen stuff. Here's a definition from this on slop. Welp, it's 20 min read, and it's got an examination of its relationship with the phemonon, and, what Sam Altman has released.
"Let's start with the intuition. What is slop?
Slop is written to pad the word count. Slop is when you procrastinate on your college essay and crap something out the night it's due. Slop is the logical conclusion of chasing the algorithm. Slop is the distilled extruded essence of the Id. Slop is when you have a formula and stick to it. Slop is when you can guess the exact minute in a police procedural where they find the killer because it's the same in every episode. Slop is when the k-complexity of the generator is low enough that you can infer its pattern. Slop is eating lunchables every day at school until you puke. Slop is when a measure ceases to be a good target. Slop is the 12th sequel to a superhero movie. Slop is generated from the authors prior without new thinking or evidence. Slop is Gell-Mann amnesia. Slop is in distribution. Slop is when the authors purpose for writing is money. Slop is a failure to say anything interesting. Slop is what you find at the bottom of the incentive gradient. Slop is a deeper simulacra level than it purports to be. Slop is vibes."
Plus, he recommended this video that's evergreen, even if I'm not interested in music making, I found it fascinating of creative software, as a bonus.
Double Bonus links!
https://simulacro.co.uk/introduction-to-slop-studies/ Somebody did a dissertation on the AI branch growth, Even though I find contradictions within the concept of encruddification, there has potential with the concept of epistemic crisis and collapse. Welp, Copywriters doing financial computationalism (David Oglivy) and the culture industry,
Oh well, it's the media. Insensitivity and sensitivity via smaller formats and there sardines only give you sardine responses.
Pick the format, pick the innards, pick the day and through selection.
What is the content that with the circle of life with all these sensitivities are to be made for another time, coherent lines, then they spindle into many shocks.
The reporter got shot by the entertainer and here we go again
There was a comparison with that place compared to a containment dome, with explosions of information, I don't know if I've been on a landmine, there are people detecting and finding out.
My investigations, yet at time. It's happened with the political, statecraft and all that jazz. Yet autonomous entertainment base their interactions on the state-craft and try to minimise it, it, regardless, ripples.
I..
I will only post a collage of my mini-essay here, since it's the only thing I have right now, I'm not sure if I'm ready to post the full post, a day, and sleepless existential nights trying.
(Cw: Callousness) In reflection with the other post, thinking verbally rather than visually has really given me a new perspective on this issue.
Sometimes, battle ain't worth it, with the recent witch-hunts I keep seeing.
Nobody wants to hire an abuser. Lifes too short. Against professional entertainment etiquette. Callousness, or disillusionment, regardless, holier than though with such a perception.
I can understand why that'd microbloggers leave an information exchange. PowerPoint, where the discourse is out of context and with screenshots of little things where correlation those not cause causation, with drive-by science.
Micro-bloggers that is in within Twitter and Bsky.
Welp, the masses want their entertainment with this, so it's only this that will fit it. Prosumer as it were, the mass's one that we'll get.
Oh no, I use meme, how ironic, huh? Prosumers man, prosumers.
10 months ago, with its updated journalism defer Alex Avile/Cory Doctorow with regard to the copyright/environment (Andy Masley) and others, I think this was a touchstone from somebody who ain't academic looking from the outside in. "Aggressively bright light to how hive-minded and dumb" ahh Flazfire. Anyway, I'm going to be more recluse and not post this on the micro-bloggers.
(Got to give credit, here's the tweet he's referenced) Why I don't go on Twitter. Or what outsiders looking inside are saying. Is this what trolls think who poison the well? Oh, had to credit the guy here's. Here's another video that could be, I'm thinking being a visual-minded person having to integrate within verbal thoughts. Here's a summation of the discourse back in 2012, and it still continues.
I guess with the moral panic slop I have to wade through, I'll see if I can keep this off microbloggers because of lack of citations. Trucking through incoherence and weirdness. (This ain't bloobergum kind of thing.)
tired sketches (cw: politics, it is a editorial, editorials and essayist tend to be more directly political. Oh well, tension'n all.)
Typographical mind
Cinemagraphical or Televisional mind
Now it's the Microblogolocal mind. We've reached a new level.
Ology, as patterns of addiction connect with the media of the message, and the ways those messages are distorted and shortened into talking points.
Guess I'll drive this point home with Sunnichee, from Neil Postman, to others in regard to minimising engagement of the fast-food info scroller. The information age is vast.
Sharing this old fitness YouTube by elite fitness, His endorsement of 3 favourite YouTubers of Mike Isratel is outdated, yet its relevant
Since they're a informal group looking for a fun little mockery of performative high school dynamics. It's easier to follow such a mentality, of which it is.
Yet it's all a status role game too, which is high, which is pretentiously high to laugh at to release tension with anti-drama? Or do we gag at, which controversy it is to follow to be part of the in-group, which is to be excluded? Where is the line.
All rhetorical questioning as where the friend group unpredictably goes and win's the viral lottery.
Hunting packs, I don't know what to know about them. Mob Manipulation is something that ain't
So don't bet on the scarce chance of going viral and then sponsorships.
I think of this quote when it comes to popular/unpopular with celebrity, not breaching certain rule-of-laws with others.
"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection." Neal Boortz
It was the last quote that was quoted within the atheist splits years ago.
Gore rips, warning of a parody while it's an above the grade, it's still a parody channel. Guess he's bit the apple and I hope he plays with genre, subscription model and something not-parody/satire.
Welp, that's social media of VElma.
3:44
"I'm meta!"
"Ugh"
So that's the notion of all of this, the Meta was being pursued by mass media for the age of time, and I don't work it, it's always focused on meta, Most efficient tactics available, that's what this Intellectual property of mass media rely on, It's where they get hermeneutics of multiple interpretation, logos of money, erotics of holistic qualitative.
Or that's how it will be.
I can see the tension, right? All social media precipitation, can't turn it off.
All of this and all of that simple and clear dichotomy.
(Anders Brevick of lone wolf)
Ah, the times I was an existentially hanging on 14 years ago, back when I atheism was a matter of talks and video logs of philosophical pondering were a thing, this may not be completely true.
What an artefact, it was the seeds of what was the 2016, then it was a next time.
People bring and try to litigate victims, arbitrarily, non-sequitor. Hard determination still lingering, some people can't be helped.
It's why I'm not a gamer.
People are self-reflecting, people are moving on. I'm moving on, Good.
Dogmatic circles, such things, go in circles informally to help us through the day like breathing air. Yet at such a time when an argument that it's going to happen with arguing with a gender denier. There's something about it that they simply don't want to listen, to see if they are arguing within bad faithed troglodyte.
That's the problem with such a matter, they are either trying to argue from a fundamental precept of informal groups within thick tanks and so forth.
Since trolling and spamming will exist since the internet follows through, it's a matter to know how much we are products to our social media sites with these bad actors, or the tantrum industry complex is being fuelled. It's not a matter of childism, adultism, and maturity, it's seen the gap of illiteracy that challenges our own ways of seeing.
Arbitrary contradictions and inconsistency lead into another turn. Preach to the own choir here.
Nope, I don't think this covers psychosis, it's reminding me of the way atheists accused theists that they are crazy. This was refuted, and it's not going to happen. The insane asylum ain't coming back.
No no no, let's not try and bring the insane asylum back. With the method being in the madness.
Moving past of the Victorian insanity accusations, we are to make it our pursuit to see how we can decipher and see mental illness and disability as a thing to go with, and that means AI too.
I could point out a bunch of men and suits with money as a bunch of freaks, yet that does not go to the heart of ideological and material conditions. It's going to get unhistorical.
Eschatology, End times have been with us all this passages, Yet's that associated with all cults like Scientology and bebops comet. Including, I must say, Atheism science fiction.
