Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
Dogmatic circles, such things, go in circles informally to help us through the day like breathing air. Yet at such a time when an argument that it's going to happen with arguing with a gender denier. There's something about it that they simply don't want to listen, to see if they are arguing within bad faithed troglodyte.
That's the problem with such a matter, they are either trying to argue from a fundamental precept of informal groups within thick tanks and so forth.
Since trolling and spamming will exist since the internet follows through, it's a matter to know how much we are products to our social media sites with these bad actors, or the tantrum industry complex is being fuelled. It's not a matter of childism, adultism, and maturity, it's seen the gap of illiteracy that challenges our own ways of seeing.
Arbitrary contradictions and inconsistency lead into another turn. Preach to the own choir here.
Nope, I don't think this covers psychosis, it's reminding me of the way atheists accused theists that they are crazy. This was refuted, and it's not going to happen. The insane asylum ain't coming back.
No no no, let's not try and bring the insane asylum back. With the method being in the madness.
Moving past of the Victorian insanity accusations, we are to make it our pursuit to see how we can decipher and see mental illness and disability as a thing to go with, and that means AI too.
I could point out a bunch of men and suits with money as a bunch of freaks, yet that does not go to the heart of ideological and material conditions. It's going to get unhistorical.
Eschatology, End times have been with us all this passages, Yet's that associated with all cults like scientology and bebops comet. Including, I must say, Atheism science fiction.
I'm being overly meticulous for a point, to the point of calorie tracker.
Bearnards boop animation
Current day on Thursday, last day of July. Unreliable work tracker got from this post, with thoughts.
Two fat Monstys -8hrs from idea board 5hrs?
Scar's portrait
-8 hr 31 on pinups of Jon On Plaza.
Double spread's within adult works Frog F'd minus the 33 h
Cover
End cover pinup. These are moments I have done after my workout schedule 5/2 week. Apparently. Even if I cut back on volume.
The lord's ram splash pages.
My blog pages (some of them lost as I deleted the doodles as I was done) Total collective time.
Look it that, my vertical blog doodles are even more inconsistent.
Another with my pinups. Last time it was five hours, it was typing up in m blog.
Sometimes I type in my phone, I read while walking, does that count? Reading for pleasure, reading for essays to learn a thing or two,
ugh, felt most tired with this one
This was all the industrial tradition of scientific management by Taylor. Yet I cannot determine or take it seriously, there's only a long succession of mise-en-place and the little.
Then the physical coaches like Eric helms with auto-regulation, fatigue management and deloading with workload sensitivity. That's not even touching on the work, and it's ontological characteristics that It could be questioned. Anti-work and the Burnout society with the virtue of uselessness.
Yet ho ho, all these work hours. They're all so arbitrary.
It's going to take a lot of unionizing and atomisation that will take on the industrial burnout machine, that's already displaced us.
Oh, and remember Ashton Hall's morning routine, there's this thing that it was pure advertising, and it's race to the bottom because it's become a commodity now.
Bragging on social media labour power has become advertisement now, and the cobra effect of that has seeped into it. They
I'll put a gag routine here.
Even with the work hour laws and such. They are not reflected with the advertisement for these kinds of motivational TikToks. Unethical advertisements driven by response rates and audience capture.
This applied latterly with my programming of artwork has been better, so I'll share it.
I wonder what the growth tubers on social media are doing? Stuff that does not work. That course of trying to be one's own boss is still here.
Such a ceo-mindset of physcopoltic
Spams still spam, and advertisement led platforms are still entertainment platforms first, not fund-raising ones. Ad-creep is still ad creep, even with the infinity of the charity out there. International infinity.
Best know what limits.
This a reflection on influencer courses are garbage, here's why.
A lot of them are cropping up, trying to deterimine a cdp of commodity algorithm and market to feed, to makertise the unmarkerteriseable.
What a shame, maybe that thing of creativity and passion are internal and not verified like product are something, I dunno.
Television advertising ain't incompatible with internet, why?
Along with it's 90s origin, it was not meant to be like that. Designed for one to one with minimal video hosting.
Foundations on interruption advertising, with a platform especially without foundherentist lifeboat on the sea of the internet, it's a race to the bottom.
A rift of an internet and a mass marketer, the internet user, from world I inter was designed for a specific one.
People have written about it, Tim Wu and other ethicists to anti-consumerism. Tim Wu has written about it in with James William article being quoted. To saying the remote control is the first adblocker to exist. For the glamour medium, that's the one that draws in the most illiterate audience, and it's crowd.
(Not that bad movie when it comes with remote controls)
Brad Guiger says that using interruption is akin to the shooting oneself in the food, Stephanie Sterling has moved to Patreon as with DJs Like Isaac Varzim. Others remove ads entirely, and Full Moon Matinée has removed it entirely.
Predictions of where mass advertising is going.
. Will still remain, as with all axiological concern, is suspended to make it continue with advertising campaign. . Scepticism will still remain, any user who's based on the sole business model will have to make the sceptic feel right.
. Since it's not going to go away, Interruption advertisers will have to face that anarchists will continue to use it. That's always going to happen as they uncommercialise everything . Lack of clarity of using interruption advertiser can lead to downfalls like Ello . Advertiser-friendly and word-friendly words of babyspeak are and have contribute to adversial relationships . Scamvertisements, unregulated, irresponsible interruption advertising. The Faustian bargain with them is that there is arguably the biggest race-to-the-bottom compared to subscriptions and direct donations.
. As noted with Matthew Barthmolows Ad-creep, advertisers and mass media have been equivocating free speech with commercial speech.
That's merely some of the challenges, as people set up guardrails.
Even Robert Mckee's stated that interruption advertising is going out, with statistics moving towards subscriptions and direct transactions.
Where's the charity within the oxymoron, where fan art, community activity, advertisement and everything is translated into a heavy user (whale) activity, such.
To ignore such a working conditions without even realising on the nebulousness of sharing, and now we're struggling.
Got this word from Joleen Bloom, fascinating term with the gotcha games I've avoided, along with microtransactions. Cannot endorse that within conscious. Even if its Xxl Woofia.
There are going to be examination of the terms of work as a performance for somebody else in a new light, including of its antithesis of lazy once again, anti-work boredom and other ways reassembled of their definitions and to be idle then made anew again.
Incoherent, incongruent, inconsistent ideas are still ideas, to be remixed into something other.
Making the concepting regards to something that made, that's abundance/scarcity.
So to speak.
Don't know what to make the conceptual distinction and meaning, continue to plod through because abundance is going through what seems to the finiteness of scarcity and the abundance with is the many ideas.
With literature with, incongruity is used for dissonance effect of complex characterisation.
So take a parachute, welcome it for a moment when on the internet, shut it off.
Previously on Couch Gregor's ai editorals. Since I'm dissatisfied with all the editorials, I made my own.
Looking at the coco workflow, there's the usage of noding and shaders here like it's used within blender, with 3d models.
Huh, according to the questionable lawsuits there n has been ethical questions in regard to this, I've had to check what this will do for independents.
Looks like it will have to relax and into noding, with minimal text-to-prompt speech, I'm afraid such a matter will move towards no copyright infringement. The environmental concerns along with the labour is another matter.
I can still see some inconsistency here and there, i think it will.
The only answer to this will be to do another art piece.
Since copyright licensing laws aren't going to stop this ( Disney has been developing its out diffusion models for to replace to concept artists.. ) Such a matter that copyright infringement it out of existence, it's going move into ethical questions with regard to its use and not contingent on commercial publishing and industry.
Licensing politics! Yeesh. Have they slapped me with a copyright infringement from drawing an Aggron as a pin-up, perish the thought. I'm merely a content producer to them anyhow.
This book is on my audiobook list in terms of essays. So many coming out these days. Got the audiobook.
( Oh hint, my untested estimate is that I agree with 80% percent of the book, it's good at dealing with the transhumanist thought that's been erupting more within Silicon Valley and the saviour complex.)
With the rise of deepfakes will continue to occur, along with the
The age of scepticism is going to get more muddy. Herschel Gordon Lewis had a point with direct response rates
Disinformation campaign first, funding latter.
Going to have to boost this as such tech evolves, Fox Key did make a post that this will continue since films are the most labour-intensive and expensive forms that we take for granted. Including videogames, and such a licensing that will only move it underground, along with managing.
I'm not sure if we can out-license of with this will combine to some odd concoctions, I don't like this I.P loving people, (Even though I can imagine a system of resource redistribution not contingent on it, merely like how qualitative differences between a restaurant and a soup kitchen works. Does that make me a anarchist? Oh, well. )
It's not that the lowest common denominator word of content means the worst and the best. Bill Gates definition versus Martha McLuhan definition.
Welp, I'll have to keep track as these things unfold, and soul-searching will occur. This broad brush will see more erm, cases, so to speak. Both Industrialists and the silicon will be watched.
(Also it's copyright infringement, not theft, RFAA implanted that. )
Ludologically, I can't agree with the behaviourism of Gerwinder, with my own disagreement. Simple because sociologists have more appealing theories of social development.
If you haven't already, I'm still going through the ideation of a previous Neverpost, of hypersexual hentai and the post-platform. Or how these stages stick and go.
Oh, how the hierarchy commodification of power scaling and the affiliation of a community'n charity never go away.
Thing with working in the industry. Something about the pale king was a woman who ranted about being a sex object
Or monopsony, a single seller with many buyers.
Single selling of sex to many thirsty suitors.
Objectification and power scaling, status roles and informal primacy to our culture, it does not need to be embraced. Yet that's what perception of our hierarchy and other alternatives in regard to learning are own meaning of status in our culture.
(That's not counting on objectification vices such as murder, violation of boundaries trafficking, autonomous things that are to be found in the legal institution. Sexual objectification has been discussed )
That's what they talk about when it comes to audience capture. (Editorial, politics and stuff by Gerwinder.)
He's not a man who cares about expressions and shouting, along with writing constructive editorials, and spending 20 hours within a circular debate.
A debate of rationalism and hijacked postmodernism, rejected meaning locking into categories of phantasms. Of bad actors serving secrets and nebulous pretensions.
What a silly, ranty warrior.
Such catharsis is physical, and the hedonic treadmill that is never satisfying, such a paradox of satisfaction will be beyond his imagination and he may be info a seductive trap, low traction response videos.
Then he'll move onto vlogging into the with, thinking of how Asheal will hit on him.
Then that post will unpredictable go viral with the tea spill community.
Is this political hub-bub of quietism activism of entertainment, merely commercial ad-creep I wonder.
Thinking to this show vs Telling
Including the scenes, which I learned from the story grid.
why not both? Thinking of the trove of writers on substack again.
"Secondly, even if you are looking to “show” it’s important to remember that virtually all fiction involves both “showing” and “telling.” If some over-zealous writing teacher claims you should never tell, ignore them. You need both exposition and scene, at least in most works. The way to apply this rule is to show the most important information for your themes, story, and characters. Show us the pivotal scenes, the dramatic peaks, and the crucial plot twists. Tell us the information we might need to know, but isn’t as dramatic or thematically important. Part of this is a question of emphasis, signalling to the reader what is important, but another part is time management. Put simply: telling is typically quicker than showing. It takes less words to sum up a conversation or scene than to summarizing it. So understanding when to tell and show is a crucial aspect of controlling the pacing of any story."
Oh, well, are people afraid to make ideology and political commentary with their fiction? Well, prosumerism in the west always exist, i shan't use the non-authority of the prosumer public, they don't know.
Beware those who make a scene of prescriptive quietism.
I don't know if what I write is too controversial, or should I be controversial for the right reason? Contrarian with meaning or premeditation.
Rules change and shift, Yet there are places with netiquette. With advertising, there are always shifting the guardrails unless they are enforced. So thanks Ad-creep.
Regarding Politics, people don't like direct political/ideological commentary, unless the medium attempts to avant-garde a complete subtraction of community and society, there are going to be questions of governance and authority. It's merely a protest of entertainment/bargain seekers of don't be controversial. Be it with flame wars and quietism employed, I hope such an unannounced decorum does not stop you from writing editorials and essays.
In regard to didactic stuff of non-fiction, satires, Allegorical and morality plays, that's another matter. Oh, and editorial cartooning that comes with the direct political and ideological messaging on the genre tin.
As for organisation, I'll leave that for another post.
Don't spam, Don't commodify everything like charging air or not, nobody want's to be pitched on micro. Commodify/Commune, best treat subjects intrinsically first, not a leverage for a deal. Don't conflate commercial speech with free speech.
Only when it's anticipated, personal and relevent.
Micro-blogging, espeicially on the main site should not be considered a marketing medium; an opportunity, pick your battles with what platform to express or advertise too. There are only so many hours in the day to keep the work hours within. Commune and only offer services like a truted attorney with a plantif.
Question everything, even the age of sceptism, yet certain waves of sceptism of questioning everything can be questioned too.
Abstract expressionism, again. Got this term from Oxford Academia, I'm a smarty little couch. 👓🛋
Literature illuminate new concepts for what it's like. The success of the esteem where it's a success despite institutional rejection critical literary success, and then, there's the-
The success de scandal where is today's sonic the hedgehog. How history repeats itself, is that shock value or somewhere discovery lies. Even when advertising can rationalise its opportunism with any guardrails, there's always an entire expose industry complex waiting to slurp it up. Well, such is the public exictement and then notoriety/infamy. Race to the bottom?
Then there's the esteem, The naïveté of such a Success of de esteem, especially with the permission of the big publishers and studios.
Which as Independents, we don't need such a permission.
What a romantic fantasy of being picked up by the commercial publisher and getting adapted! What a dream! What a fantasy? What a naïveté. Well, maybe they'll move onto naiveism with that, I don't know what will happen to it and everything can be made into inspiration porn. That's what preposterism happens to be with its ad creep.
All stuck within the Discovery Channel of our own perceived dreams circulating. Regardless of these goals, it could be meant to be literary or commercial success, things change.
experiment really brings into the mediums as metaphor.
Ethical questions in regard to our mediums.
Nothing new,
these polemics have been done with Neil Postman's
musing ourselves to death.
Aaaaaaaash, the logos orgy of each line intersecting with a ding. This is literature, cointelpro that direction, another serialised shots of tennis player embarrassments, an essay on empathy, identification and cultivated sympathy. Then it pings and you're in a relationship drama romance, and it flitters between many directions genres till you're flat on your butt.
Ding!
Why did I buy this? Well, the literary troll within me demanding so complex of a story of Stream of conciousness perspectivism that hurts. NO, I won't be looking up the Wikipedia summary of this literary achievement, yet today I will go through the novelists other works of art, and see what I can make of that.
Hmm, The Pale king. Our status Ante of our fiction.
A lot of politics on entertainment platforms have reached a standstill, obsession with debate is really the pinnacle of amusing ourselves to death. With the O'Reilly factor being the part where winning and semantics or placed over, with the flourish of the shouting over having a reconciliatory discussion.
No cooperation, no friendly competition, nothing, bells, and whistles. Why? Because it's better at pulling an audience. Yet better does not equate to good.
Entertainment and art is fiction. The same is happening with legal fictions, finances, education, journalism and all other fields, there's always a convincing argument to make it not edutainment. I say that as an edutainmentier. Part of the mediocre series that delivered on its kickstarter, It was tool time's video on how everything still continuing. It's why that with journalism and literary ways that you can do
30 min editorial, 5 min on the Ken Ham, where ideology is made to be sold like advertising. Then the puffery tempts with the entertainment product made online. Cussy as we can write.
I'm not sure with if the ludology is made to serve the game of power scaling that has overtaken-the discourse. Where the performance of showmanship today is why I prefer to call myself an entertainer.
That's the problem of dealing with entertainment platforms 🥁
“Immediately uninterested” The guy from Idea channel. Mike Rugnetta. In response to a new indie startup telling him to share cat photos. Oh dear, that's where the monopoly/monopsony.
He has a provocative idea, what if sharing is actually struggling? With contradictions. All these posters who can't have the effort because it doesn't scale.
Only share with intention, not mindlessly with value-free neutral platforms deciding to not curate. As new social media alternatives show up, there's only going to be so much time t help with other audiences, everybody can only hold so much.
Guess times jump and we must go back to a website, owning and scribbling our words.
Stuff writing has taught, that audiences that chase the latest mass market trend are not going to step off the carousal. Writing with the limited showmanship of literature can be a humbling experience, some say it's harder to write a game than it is to program it.
All part of the process rather than the results that appear fresh of the social media, which everything is not sacred there from the vulgarisations of the internet. The amount it takes to verbalise thoughts with sucking others with jingling keys respects other literacy, which I hope to increase and illuminate, not level up. Yet shine a light.
A bit of an enlightenment and not a metric based metric, I know, we are talking soft skills here, stuff that's hard to measure. Where ideas and the enrolment matter and conceptual abstraction helps make this a testing ground.
Not like going viral and monetizing was an option today, despite other companies capitalizing off it. Well, you give what you take with those under the .com things.
Even copywriters, and certain commercial novelists, how do you deal with mass ignorance? Nobody want's to read with attention and time commoditized into content, and at this point. It's merely our keyboards verbalising our thoughts.
So, education and edifcation has been industrialised beyond our things, beyond intentional design of actual benefit, can our children be put to blame with how these systems are forming to our own ways. Adultism telling other to grow up, even in the event of there children's entertainment, or now an adult novelist as gone of the deep end, or well, F*****
Childish, and adultism is all constructs of properties to the engine of non-fictional ways, so that our taxonomy.
Is this where the verficationism is getting us? Vague gesturing of our actions? Now programmers are seeing the problem of vibe coding for their own games and craft, where this aesthetic science is made with the intermingling happen.
Seeing AI infiltrate from the programmer's side , 17 min podcast.
Vibes are not experiences, or feelings or intuitions. Content for content sake. So self-important it's cynicism that it can't be taken seriously. Yet here are the points where commercial coding and normal functional coding is where it will mix, and the ways the creative mixing will happen is to be taken out.
