I try to look at the hackneyed marketplace of Twitch Viewers and try not get frustrated

 Well Seth, They have a market for anything, you're a liberal generalist, duuuh.

On fiverr, there are roles of a job to get specification of getting twitch followers. With all this frustration, I did check it out. Since It's not my job to share-crop twitch react streamer/gamer audience.

So they all follow the holy mandate of the SEO, where search is organised, or where it is necessary to function of anything for anybody, the desires of many wanna being picked with metrics that can be easily bought.

For it is

METRIC MEDIOCRITY

The teens want their Fortnite

Noooooooo, I don't want to stream minecraft and react streams for an audience who will dump me the moment I do what I love!

RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRUGUUGHHGH RRRRRRRRGUHHGHHHHHHRUGHHH

RRRURURURURURURUR

Wow, I almost transformed into a monster for entertaining those audiences, interpreting my important business. Business of zining, can I express my right to be forgotten if I stop following the spectacle of games and new-cycle. Not becoming the product of in-sync status and the performative apathy of trying to avoid the dominion of my eye-buttons.

Important business vs riff-raff business

Nakedly easy-to-read relations

Are they pretending to hide their relationalism of the metrics,

Little office clerks, working and quietly, not saying the loud part out loud. Everybody is gaming a kind of metric relationalism, or are they in unison of this mawkish pleasure principle, or this satisfaction of teleology of desire?

Everybody has it, the pretensions of acting normal that this relationalism of direct response metrics that let us understand each other's status, status is always relationalism, scarce powers that shim and shimmer amongst the waves of our streams of consciousness that show priorities of importance that guide the intuitions, and into the structure of friends and enemies, attractions and repulsions. Even the complex rationalisations that will be justified.

All for the point, for that sweet, sweet interruption of monetised ads.

Right between the points. Between the relations.

I look back at this media theory By seth, Then wonder.

( Worth another relink )

Response rate for all the wrong reasons, the hustle cycle.

 

Disorganised poem

The first thing that comes up

the High response rates of porn

then when wonder why

everybody is doing it.

then why does it or tautology romance

does not entail

the most profitable stuff

that such we do

no lampshading it

Funnel

Seo

Don't rock the status quo or entertainment

follow the leader

follow

repeat

what

will

happen

to

my

business?

what

is

the

mechanics

of

exchange

and

set

price?

What

is

STATUS?

Status, compete, scarce already, numbers game, hidden.

Monopoly

pretenders

appreciate the hack who does not

and the hack who does

well

they come.

Hustle-archy, With the need of structure for a conscious

Due to the quick moving shapes outside in the parks there's this kind of Status role assigned and explicitly and semiotically through the signalling and conduct of Hustle of the status role of money cool money or old money.

The status quo, gets to be that way by travelling under the radar, sight unseen. Unconsciously, becoming the status quo ante. It's not an announcer.

Do they do tailing and all with all that subculture.

Try not be to cynical with that.

Was reading the Tyranny of Structureless of what may happen. By Jo Freeman. Thx Feminist literature.

The land of no boundaries of business guru maxims

 This vision were all the matter. 

With mass advertiser. Goes into the hustle trance.

The way of the machine zone of playing an eternal economy game of physical pleasure/pain, all the complexities between. With the emotional ways and emotional states, compared to the physical states.

Then I'm trying to clamber for an extension, then I'm not, getting substack posts via business gurus, are well, people who happen to keep working, it's all the advice of people who keep workings

How is the motivation doing, self-industry complex? Any benefit? You don't have to follow any of this advice if you don't have a problem. They are nebulously reaching for better within the void of extrajudicial lands.

Thanks, I guess, then there's that phrase in snarl quotes.

Personal brand, not caring about strangers. Guess that's the confirmation a publisher does using the legal fiction. With what a publisher does after all the labour is all collected, his personal value judgement is there.

I can't blame that kind of mindset, if he's running an independent, giving free advice if it does not work or not.

At least you're not selling anything, bud! Well, bought into this.
Took your test on your blog.

Such entertainment 🛋️💭

There you go, into the sunk cost of getting a book deal (or not) I know you're trying to help. With words of authenticity cropping up again (Illusionist entertainers aren't), then it's the reason this will go.

Where will you stop with the how-to roulette? Reverse engineer.

Well, continue on with your generalities.

(You could consider pablum, what do you think?)

This one's fascinating though, creator economy he's coined? Idk, this may be what publishers give a sunk cost to creatives (Petit boug) Who happen to build their labour of signals of distribution.

Have some more, Philosophy wannabe. Signalling is talking about semiotics? I'm still reading that Umberto eco book with all the academic reading.

He's a slow-down kind of man, I'm a stay-in-sync-with-yourself-man

Solving problems? I like to give my characters problems.

Well good sir, good going on a sunk cost. 🛋️👍 Like I am.

"Stay Sovereign" Was the email.

Second order effects / Human rights / List of Philosophy

Oops, social media all status roles, I must return to be academical shell and see if I can see enlightenment.

This is my Ecosia gamification stats, by the way, that's positive externalities.

 That's the alternative of Consequentialism.

Categorical. Be it with opinion of citizens, or enforcement of institutions.

Oh, Oh will be putting this from emancipations  For current marxist academic theory, well, it's got plenty of podcasts and others.

Whatever the intention falls. Does not matter to a consequent along with it's spreadsheets.

I got this from this philosophy list, that's a load thing to add to a list or not. For beginners/intermediates wanting a refresher of the moral principles.

Is this too western, though, too American? Welp, Other than open university, beats having a wrong microblogging education.

Net neturality felt prosumer, refuted.

This is the aftermath, of a post I picked up by a Marxist-Leninist Anime Girl, who was right.

• The net-naturality felt like it was a pys-op by Netflix.
  
  @naijeieoas Dec 14, 2017
  
  "They uh… they could do this before the NN scare and they never did. Even with the rules in place they still track you with packet injections.It has actually *never* been about getting charged for social media, because companies could always do that too and they haven't. Not that Comcast is innocent in this, since what they were charging for Netflix's access certainly hasn't been lowering the cost of service or building out better infrastructure. The price I'm paying them now for a whole 3 MB/s down should be criminal.
  
  Long story short, #NetNeutrality is a scam by tech companies to go after ISPs for eating into their profits and you're all being duped by these scare tactics.Latest take I saw today was that if NN was repealed, then how would “families with multiple children” be able to afford Internet access. 😂Who in the world is delusional enough to think wired ISPs are going to be able to charge per user, as if that's even technically feasible.
  
  Most wired ISPs only see a router anyway. There was a time (way before NN was a thing) when some of them didn't like home users using a router, but the routers came with MAC address spoofing to get around that problem and the ISPs could do literally nothing about it.So they stopped caring. And besides, do people really not realize how expensive it is *now*? I'm a single person and Comcast has been $60–$80 the whole time I've had them, for 3 MB/s down! Hell I get better speeds for only slightly more on my phone!NN rules have had (___) ALL to do with the actual pricing of websites or ISPs. They've always been able to charge anything they've wanted. The FCC rules never changed that. All NN says is that an ISP can't charge extra for access to a website (which they never did to end users)
  
  I will keep yelling that the origin of the current situation is Netflix whining about having to pay Comcast for data center access and making a big political issue out of it so it didn't eat into their profit. Everything else is ahistorical, metaphysical, emotional appeal."
  
  
  This is, of course, related to their side of the inter-bourgeois fight called net neutrality, they being the first to really push the idea that it has anything to do with end users. In reality, they simply don't want to pony up any revenue to the companies servicing this traffic.

Monopoly-capitalism (not a lack of “net neutrality”) is rearing its head in information–mass media infrastructure.

"Net neutrality got taken away when the ISPs were commercialized. All the “fast lane slow lane” rhetoric in the world hasn't stopped the commercial ISPs from charging way too much for access. “Oh but they charge too much for all bits equally!” FOH 

Most people don't even know what QoS and network traffic shaping are (and how much they're used on today's Internet) but will still cry about “treating bits equally”. It's such a liberal trap like “free speech” but even communists are taking it at face value.

It all started when the well off middle class people realized they might have to pay slightly extra for Netflix because the large ISPs are competitors in that market, then got morphed into some dorky human rights campaign. Staaaaaaahp."

"I will never forgive this nation for making such a big deal about net neutrality but not about poor infrastructure or monopolistic ISPs."


The inter-bourgeois conflict of “net neutrality” is trending again. She goes. Link

Then, in 2020, she moved away, went to another plane of existence. Thank you for enlightening me and stopping me being so twitter brained with American spectacle. (You don't have to agree with the ideology, btw, )itass commercial polarization meant to sell you of prosumer activism. 

I must continue with my sociology.

The perks of obscurity

It's all a blur, so many little content curation and moderation being what is sold, all in an expanding universe of vendors and suppliers with all their advertising, all a blur, all the fandom/hatedom, all the time, all of it was going in a blur of media heads down the way.

Academics are avoiding xwitter, or microblogs, some of them are in substack, they are going there, I found a good post on obscurity.

Since it's all datum, observable of the lowest stratum of comprehension, the scientific, and the narrative of this is to study, or when with a monopoly/monopsony of attention. Fame/infamy explains the entitlement complex of status value and cultural capital.


There's little attention. No data for interupption advertising.

No Ruthless expose industry complex, the need to make dramatic fiction to draw attention.

Thousands of merchandise, gone.

Fan fictions all around. Shippers, and all that.

No Status value to follow.

Cherish this moment while it lasts, I trust you, don't I?

( Oh, I've still have to learn to do a sales call, and a payment specification. )

What did Zig Ziglar, a conflict avoider, says with the data generality and a meaningful specific? Or, a semiotic specific in a chain.

Marked for death/Marked for life

 Since certain things are blind side themselves, the doctrinaires that fly in my for-you feed with the occasional posturing the random beep boop hate.

I don't have to time, An alternative opinion is what I'm showing.

Already, they could frame this tweet, quote-mine it, then make it into a call-out post to try to get clout, yet I know better. Well, esteem, it's one big fluff of a drug. Only thing to proceed now to see others who have been through the dip and blocked, with the way of having.

Not curious or interested.
Do they realise that I'm dancing and contacting the catgirls and the furries of open-source, along with all that LLM/diffusion model discourse? Well, If they find this and take offence, that's a life.

Gamers are so, so behind on this, it ain't even funny any more.

@aelkus.bsky.social‬
"it's doomed on arrival it's doomed on arrival.
Hard to know where to begin. "AI" includes things as simple as heuristic search (go to first few chapters of the market-leading textbook). It is checking your credit card for fraud (neural network's early usage was in bank/credit transactions). Verbal creep is akin to what happened to "algorithms"
People's relationship to "slop" is also complicated. I hate a good deal of slop but also am an unabashed fan of AI-created cyberpunk electronic mixes, which I take mostly for what they are as background music much of the time
Framing as "anti-AI" at best gives you a high-end status market category, like "GMO-free" and crunchy stuff that eventually gave us RFK Jr and antivaxx crowd
I think a much more feasible thing to lean into is just the consumer backlash that is going to come after vendors realize corrosive effect of low-quality saturation 
‪Damned Robot‬ ‪@supremerobo.bsky.social‬· 3d

----
AI will probably end up being what is used to filter out Chinese factory dropshipping goods on Amazon once consumer anger forces action

---
barriers to entry will go up and its going to be interesting to see what kind of signifiers of quality will win out. history suggests they could take many different forms
i don't really have much of a clue about what they will be, in large part because vendors' interests also determine this as opposed to just consumer demand. remember chaos after FB tweaked its content recommendation/boosting software repeatedly? Fortunes instantly lost overnight
i do feel fairly confident that the crunchy approach probably leads to a dead end

Me too, as I looked into it.

Clown shoes to youtube? thoughts on glamour medium.

 I'm not in a state to make YouTube videos. Since reaching a mass audience is a matter of crapshoot, a commitment. Everybody is everywhere, even with Seth Godin and other marketers everywhere.

That's value.

Why oh why, I must seek metrics, when I can only see it through the conduct of others and the direct market measurements with the metrics, when they follow through and power leads into new leaders through all the way. Yet I know they all do underground electoral meetings of status. There's only a baseline of interest with the celebritydom of social media.

Am I survivor seeing all the status functions happen with each point of time?

Oh well, the tension of the typographical and Televisual mindsets are always with me.

jester/justicar

From the book review

The jester mocks the court, the Justicar takes it seriously.

Two archetypes, leading in towards time, leading into the time of comedy and tragedy of wester stereotypes.

The play/seriousness at it again of the state where the fun.

So, what is of plotting of the justicar, the spectacle of the fool.

Two playing, two arguing, two playing, two arguing.

All a matter of time within the energies of the status role Olympics of the function of it.

Ode to the Meme time

Abstract expressionist bwomph.

 Memeplexs

One thing social media has done, which is nice. Is memes.

The only idea and concept that Richard Dawkins every contributed to our culture, with communal expressions that lead to heuristics of better understanding of civilisation, or more heuristics.

Other ideas, such a study of meme, and the meme machine are better books on this phomonoa imo.

Quibbles, Jreg endorsement, already he may have normalised bad treatments.

Too much glazing of Richard Dawkins, the only one which I liked of the four horseman of the atheism was Daniel Dennet.

Now share along, those transcendent of the Draconian IP laws, spread away and fall through the ideas of all the ways into the art of collage and in the see of the cyberspace.

Swoosh!

Kim Kardashianifcation

 Short feedback loops

All the time

People doing pin-ups and cuties.

People doing displacement and wanting to be the next sellerbrity

All on a platform for free, 24 hours a day, and the lottery of unpredictability.

Well, shows how small this social media world is within this land of ideas.

When Kim Kardification recommends epistemology, (study of knowledge) (study from a twerk video on tik-tok) What a world.

Excuse-O-Matrix, Beware the Indiscreet, dishonest hustle

 "I wanna just ambulance chase" 

There's something wiggling, crawling, with the anti-work and the workerism of all the stuff within us that's not that a labour that only smallest and viable, yet it's escaping a responsibility to do work to get paid, or exposure that frightens.

Nobody holds everybody to account, since their engagement with these platforms means we are all suspect of them marketers, all there, pushing our buttons for status, for the state, for the status quo, for the status quo ante. 

All a game, all a thing of scarcity and election, all dutifully within the rules of our imaginations.

All the herd mentality, all the herd, that simply IS, not good, not bad. Not controlled, out in the for you tab or the Discovery. That's a algorithm, that's a market. Good or bad, that's advertising, that's propaganda, that's the commercially friendly and that's the education.

Whatever the platonic natural world justifys, whatever the polemisation is brought.

All a blur

A recursive look at links

 Something in direct ways that matter.

Does it all matter?

I don't measure them! What about the numbers? The links on the right? The way I keep talking, the manner and such.

You may be looking at them right now? See that one at the aesthetically deep dives.

You may never click it, ain't that okay? 

Oh, 

Well, nobody clicks on your links when you do an essay or an incoherent essay. Don't be a twitter 'artist' elitist bunch of twerpy pretension.

So act in mass media, for the audience of one, okay?

Do you think they click on YOUR links? Nope! Nada, that's why I don't argue and have my epistemology on microbloggers.

novelty =/= originality

People can be original, and still be insufferable.

Newness and the one an only uniqueness are not the same, Given the progression of time for each. One Direct response (extend) and the cognition (brand).

Newiness, we know the news can be ignored if it ain't emergency room stuff.

The others have gone through the gauntlet of conflicting symbolism, through pundit or cute to the blips of hosts/platforms. Well, professionals that don't attend.

If that the thing is one is first and lucky, then that ain't good enough. The law of diminishing returns takes it toll.

Bowser Detourment Guy Deboard

Bowser, your name sells millions of copies, and the world sees you as their kingpin, irreplaceable!

What will you do, feeling the ways with your infinity of pin-ups, and p*** filling the way with exhibitionism. The pleasure is painful, the priapic and tension of the receptors can't take it.

The way that tingle makes the brains sour, urgh. Headaches and nausea from the tingles, they can't feel it. Absolute Anhedonic.

Anhedonic, that's stuffed full of advertising for entertaining an audience with the same old, demanded spectacle.

You are the laughing on trick pony that's keeps going round. You've made it quantitively that brings the all down.

Come Guy Deboard, show me this villain needs another dousing of praise, one that will last to the end of time.

On a discarded lunch box flotsam, on the Blackpool beach. Then, only with cultural hegemony, such is will be. The herd morality persists within it.

speed format conclusions

Badmouse said that streamers earning fame ( or infamy symbolic relatable capital ) and money hinders the overall struggle.

I say, yeah as an activist, no as an entertainer. Yet, do these editorials say otherwise, ho ho ho, well, you do encourage me Harlen.

Staying in sync is the most important of all these.

Since streaming is the best take to be able to manage ones one personal space, there's no editing, one clear distinction between editing (non-sync) and unediting (sync).

Leaving a trail, editing along the genealogy of ideas to pluck out moments of consciousness. That is one sense, to bring verisimilitude with the work.

Gotcha Tribunals

 Thinking about Statecraft, Governance, and yes, Politics. Evaluating what Set thought.

Seth has written about it. Guess he's a liberal.

Tribalism, other than the colonial implications. Has its own sparring of power.

Or what they say about informal groups. Status and governance. 

Why is everybody thinking everything a trial to declare verdict on microbloggers?

Everything a villain? Everything a verdict. Complete in curiosity across with the microblogging mind, the amount of discourse is the take it in an amount, time to vary the way.

I'm seeing the reliance of willing misinformed opinions within the west. Relying on Ayn Rand, and now there are more pundits than every trying to out-do each other. Guess this is why we still have the academics.

As a general rule, don't bother if it takes a bibliography, since you got to stay in sync with oneself.

Media capital vs Tech capital

Oh boy it's couch Gregor talking about capital again

Looks like

Couch Gregor is in his sociological mindset still!

Media
Social capital, Symbolic capital. and Relatability, based on status, from Pierre Bourdieu's observation.

Tech
Modes of production capital, agricultural, from the industrial, too artisanal, to the executive/directional

Did you know Economics are a way to say Marxism? It came from sociology.