The culture of the Narcissim, of egoist desire

Various Lacan Refutations and gags are shared.

Yet with this way, it's like our own ideas and eyes to the manner of mental diving, it could be capital, and we could leave it that. Yet with that with how society functions.

Yet this one is with the lack of imagining of the past and where things go forgotton, where the spam goes, where the ideas go.

The romanticised family and how, in a way, it essentially reflected another anti-American kind of critique of culture.  The things that resonate with a rustic sentiment of wanting things to stay in the past, even in certain liberal critiques and other ways, and how those things get recuperated and brought back into the fold.

One could always call this a return to anti-intellectualism now, and the Glonzo theories that I keep hearing from the microbloggers as I try to do my studies.

Family theories, too many family theories. But the concept of narcissism, with roots going back, and how that concept itself has become another quick grift of hustlers with a feverish entitlement to profit and plenty of justifications for that profit, a perverse incentive. 

But oh, what a surprise. There is not even a simple idea anymore that cannot be sold now as they take it up in the arms of this new, ongoing culture war.

Going to have to hunker down, even though I know it's not going to be the case. So that's my first impression.

Ways of seeing by John Berger did this critique better

So now I'm going with that audio book with various intellectuals in substack as this moral panic passes.

Sunk fair weathers

Random business owner, good takes though

What may happen.

I did my best to try to be reasonable, yet now it's going to be more ghosts, more giving less of a cushion, and more careful curation of my feed list.

"I had to block mutuals since they were sharing techlash editorials since they could not know that much." Another leftist programmer, well, progressive, as in 'progressive' can mean many things now. Regressive to progressive to one signal to another.

The crack in the window of the atheists with the crack of the window with 2023 cannot be undone. It's why we can't unite, and that's good.

What are we doing now? What with our own minds with the Cult of Reason and the religion of humanity, all for the symbolic capital of copyright maximalism.

What are we on.

Refusing to debate on Microblogging, or not

Only to the curious

Well

Too many reassurances

Then a snide capitulation if I don't know what I'm talking about

Then a matter of the midwits of the west

It's all a totality of the spectacle

Bread and Circus

Peter Coffin own words

Apparently I still browse. And he posted a chicken and got called a p******, such is the veracity of the twitter artists.

Remember I don't associate with his views on Ukraine, im more with the Finnish bolshveik with it being a weak imperialist nation, baba bing, done.

Will jury nullify until inquired elsewise

Wishcasting/interpretive supremacy

That's the point of this indeterminacy.

All over a polemic

2023

Foundational supremacy.

Fundamental

Westboro baptist church

Sacred purity

So pure

Purity ritual of protecting labor = Copyright or TAKING MY MONOPOLY

Elite, popular, contradistinction

End

The Samsung avatar nope

A ineffeable abominable self-portrait

This f***** on my Samsung, its me, no ownership, a smoothy Sweden of technical perfection.

Clean as a baboons bottom and crawled out of the mechanic bowls of a crude jetison.

Its silicon valley tack at it's finest incursions generality's that an 🥚 is more specific.

...

Yet, no anger, no fuming comes.

Only passiveness.

Interpassiveness that I can't pathologise

Bopkins Cappy Neoliberal Feed

 Moewoeowo Neoliberalism is back or not don't ask me.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱👏🐱 Hurray Meooooooooowwww.

Reasons for the creative commons here, except for my oc CG.

I have written the most naive, incompetent essay for an idealised principle. Yet,

I believe it. Digit-Ethics Manifesto.

Because they can bog off with there intellectual  smoke-blowing and haughty snootiness of false consciousness. Bears repeating. His spirit possessed me to make the 

Acknowledging the good'n bad. We are not going to take your toymakers away, from commodity toy to art. Drm is drm, I won't tolerate snide worship of.

Slide from the a French techno company. 2 hours it's got politics all over it (what do you expect under an editorial.)

by Conspiracy Theories, TechnoFascism, and the Prospects for a... | James J. Hughes, PhD,

A compound workout of and the biceps and triceps of a bench-press 💪🛋

I've never seen such.. a lack of humanity from the confusionism 2023 megacopyright landgrab, and it comes from the 120  media apparatus of 50 years the fissure of the age tradition of 100 tradition of academia (older).

This won't get along perfectly, they will be conflict. Going through though, feels like the option now.

The censorship of free expression is so foundherently wrong that it's worthy hill to die on.

The laws of the Internet shall make my wisdom immortal. Information wants to be free, and beware those who wanna gate it.

Information wants to be free.

Even with the taint of interpopulist dilemma's it has.

his statue website

Wow, that functionalist description is out-dated as I go with Maggie Vale.

Yet everything is a pure though a internet own boy.

Also, Cory Doctorow in the past, was correct about DRM here. I need to compile it all for the internet artifact that this will be discovered on here.
Transcript of that. There's not good social media, so I'm going to keep this in home base.

Mediocrity and the death, by Seth Godin.

All the data here, ain't it special.

The question remains.

So the ideal of Arron Swartz shall live through all of us, monistically.

Convienient eristics heuristics; The Commercial metrology trap

Once you see algorithms develop, you'll see how they think, through philosophy of mind.

You cannot unsee.

There monotizing meterolgy. The connectionism, then the grissere of a metaphysical labour, to the unpaid labor.

Parsimony/Plenitude

 This Simplicity on Stanford got me thinking.

The chatton anti-razor applies to the novels end product to did the explanation expander.help reveal with wine from the grape juice.

That's a fact that those oversimplifies from shorter and shorter of the evaporation of quick form content, it's merely another vessel to bring new epistemics to the aspects.

Chatton did the explanation expander.

"Whenever an affirmative proposition is apt to be verified for actually existing things, if two things, howsoever they are present according to arrangement and duration, cannot suffice for the verification of the proposition while another thing is lacking, then one must posit that other thing."

Wonder what he will do with short form tie-toker and microblogging heuristics, heuristic pilled, heuristic addicted, or heuristic minded, or without the expansive effect of the outside.

Then the time will come, when there is the shorter form, and the complex form

The sea army veteran that advertised this

Another lone novelist in my feed

On amazon with self publishing his marine stories.

It was a small time with his cup of joe, and i should have put his novels on his auto-reader.

No, the olds man gone away on my feed.

Another moment lost in the noise, i am noise trying to be distinct within this field of commercial law. Noisis becoming distinct.

Here We Go Again, lost another novelist.

It's so hard to get anything, including royalties and stipends, as one.

Then again, what a circular matter of holding a belief.

Another belief, another one.

Examination of the unwritten rules of attention

"All unwritten rules of social media regarding reaching out socially are fake and dumb, and are only upheld because maybe one or two people without boundaries rubbed the originator the wrong way.

Everyone is fishing for attention, and let no one tell you otherwise"

Odendo

Aetiology, there is indeterminacy of the algorithm, which is the means of production and the productive forces of the artisan class to reach status. With there epistemics being circular, of shifting coherent ism, of scaling and descaling of the labour agent. Searching for remarkability, polemics and eristics within a void of attention-less

Aetiology > epistemology > Teleology > Ontology

To a holistic way.

That's a lot of mereology for you. Hopefully no pedantic.

Don't contradict activists

 Yeah, activist flowing

Nothing I can't win like attempting to contradict anger. Anger and fear are irrational, and they are the things that you irrational cannot handle. It's the way things have been.

That one guy who wasted all his ten years on a drama farm

To the Japanese soldier fighting a war within WW2. 

There's stuff I can influence or entertain, along with all that. Something left back within the most critical case,

Back in 2016, back in 2023. Such is a legal wrestling match.

Then there are stragglers within the SEO, searching for an answer on moot points, thd opinion has been entertained and the negation is with grifting to a good or service dependent on the gift symbolic capital, or the reactionary capital.

Slopulism, Populism, Poptism

Such are the terms of commodity consumption as of today and that line of mediocrity that is aspired to out of dejournment and recuperation, cycle out of cycle. Then there is a layer of that, the psychoanalysis of attempting to read for the hegemonic lands.

Such is fair use/fair dealing with it, leading into reflections that lead into new culture, a new feedback loop.

Some are at peace, some at war.

We will never hear the end of it.

Media critics = reading the dead

Despite the function of social media, what predates our own ways and thought patterns can be reserved us

Determine entire personalitys?

Yet with the predetermination of the tech, only with the sociological/psychological fictions can it be made to help serve, yet with that described desire of such a task, we are through with picking a pluralistic phenomenon of many minds coming into one space of social media.

How do you read that? How can it be read? Noise from the fuzz can only lead to distinction, then decision.

Silly monopolies of the front.
 

two types of DNF

As is one of lack of material time constraint.

One of lack of mental care, of the volume that's made Or Seth described impact.

Another is a lack of interest; it goes back to the idealistic ways of the terminology of marketingese, such as 'brand'. Along with the material manners with direct response.

Do you think Seth looked at all the smut and went 'wow' If you a/b test everything that you get from a porn site. Failing to elaborate on that, merely the banal nature of such is the spam and commodity, or am I looking in the wrong spot?

Even though it's fine to go that direction, even if there's not difference of the pin-up

Third reason could be a ragequit, those results may vary.

Agnostic non-curation

Oh, so what is it for the irrationality of the fundamentalness of the algorithm? Of prior recognition of a scroll that can be made into madness

I can determine the way it picks up the random matter; that's the definition of random, with no predictable fundamental, absurd to define by design. Fundamental candlesticks require a base.

So with this blind selection of organic traffic, be in it for the deal compared to an institution built around the copyright industry complex.

Once more, a trudge of the non-fundamental epistme of the realm.

Proscenium opening

https://billingblox.chargefield.com/

That impression in a world of billing boxes of post-commodity delight. Frantz Fanon called the forgotten the 'Black'. The proscenium, with the desire of the other.

With the need to reach complete entertainment of our satisfactions from Hegel. With these regressions and progression of direction of our arguments, it meant to show within the social media colosseum.

How is it that those conflicts and recollections, we are the centre of them?

Sometimes with a high-status market category, it's hard to fix. Can do what to do without the permission of groups.

Of the pretty good dissatisfaction of sex.

Still thinking about sex capital. Or a hopeful irony-maxxing from a pornographer who rambles. Along with the amount

Yet at this point, I lurk on Substack. I'm not sure the way of the defeatist hack way of egoism that I happened to have with the boon is defensible; sex sells, or until it doesn't.

Or is it that the spectacle sells? That's been as old as time, as old as play. As old as the caveman being able to dance before industry from agriculture.

It's becoming apparent that the intuition of the commodity. Or what.

"I'm merely doing what's natural and expressing my sexuality." Sure thing, do express complexity. Or, to conclude with this post, to utopia with heaven in denial of the metaphysics of it all. Common sense and intuitions will be around.

(Oh, Did he use beep_Boop? Idc now.Don't at me.)