My foundherent philosophy beliefs

My entertainment persona, is only part of being a memoirist. Mesmerism ain't in my cards, Under the veil of fiction there's a man, inspired by Andy Masley.

Consider using this to start my foundherent belief manifest. Part of my memoir series. It's not a fixed epistemology and coined by Susan Haack. Will begin with this framework.

I don't have the expectation of somebody clicking my links, I'm doing it so I can check it out. Along with others.

Complete certainty, Founderhent Belief.

Things I'm going to carry till the end of my lifespan.

• Naturalism exists, (introductory article here.) Since the doctrine means that sciences of physical to the sociological do matter. Contingent and downwards of our rational facilities dependent.
• Moral Desert does not exist, or, Polemics ain't serviceable to an entertainer by definition. Rehab and deterrence prefably as a performer. Not because it's for a living, because the magician loves to conceal and hold attention.
• Personal identity reductionism or the Buddhist (anatta) is reductionist. Radical, or the identity we make, it's constructivism to perform for informal groups. Or the more formal groups officially anointed by the state. The fictions of self we make are great entertainment, though.
  
  It's all into status roles and state within our linguistic make-up within our discoveries circles.
• Political egalitarianism, ideally, everybody rights are respected. Even with the critiques of the Marxist labour of value (the internet is a counter to that.) Well, I'm not a Marxist in the doctrinaire sense, more a sociologist.
• Due to my Epistemological foundherentism and no fixed fundamentalism, I rest within the distribution of laying along and correcting my beliefs as more convincing evidence comes along. All part of the dialectical within the sociological mesh we exist.

Pretty sure beliefs, mid certainty

• Anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron because it requires a state to enforce a monopoly or monopsony. Self-ownership is an absurd concept.
• Value Rationalism and Pluralism, both combined, help liven the discourse within academic circles to help coexist.
• Utilitarianism can lead to a race to the bottom and should be with the deontology governance best interests to moderate it.
• Atheism : Secularism Yet I respect internalism if their rituals do not interfere with the state. Pretty sure god does not presuppose my thoughts. Even with theological naturalism.
• Marxism Karl Marx underpinning of sociology never intended to be having his doctrine written in stone and leave a legacy. Regardless, due to it leading to autonomy such as the stonewall riots, I cannot thank him enough with the labour theory of value. So yeah, he contributed. The state should, within reason, stop the perverse incentives of reactionary capital.
  
  Since with my disagreements with Marx anyway, most Marxists have become Marxists Leninst Maoist, anarcho libertarians, Sociologists and Economists.
  

• Free will compatiblism is needed via the state to hold bad actors accountable for their misdeed, got that one from Daniel Dennet. Along with deontological structure to help organise society to help coexistence. One could say this is my politics.
• Marx was a naturalist with scientific determinism, so scientific realism model.
  Since science is our reality, academia should be able to help inform our public through mass communications to help our hierarchy of insight. Of our communication of plot the spectacle, academia and the main road.
• License witherism: The privatisation of property should be resisted, for whatever reason, people should not create an entire industry complex of reasons concerning Platonic natural law. There's a reason why rights are not natural. A handshake deal and a deal is a deal.
  
  Marx was inconsistant with this, So Aaron Swartz goal with the creative commons is to help the Petit Boug (Like me) able to structure entertainment with the productive forces. Enclosure of the commons should be resisted.
  
• The right to the city matters with holding from reactionary capitalism. Since, capitalism has provided us with plenty of benefits, including welfare. One should be acting autonomously, away from those who own the means of publishing and reactionary strains to decommodify. Mutual aid networks can interconnect and help wither away the needs.
• Animal cruelty witherism: The meat industry complex is cruel and it should be regulated. Despite my omnivore, a reduction of protein could lead to weight maintenance and a more deontological society.
• I'm a bit iffy on electoralism, rather expressing the right to a protest whenever needed.
  
• Mental/Status Functionalism : We, in a society from the profession and de-professionALISE are designed for status role play and seriousness. Everything from the input and out of our wishful intentions and from our workful labour expressed is a manner of interconnectivity that creates our own interactions.
  
  These are ingrained in our structures. From informal groups into a stat of our formations.
• Semiotic reductionism rather than a semanticist, not a Saphir Whorf Hypothesis I'd prefer to think visually rather than verbally, although I find great value within literature and the art of the verbal expression. Words do not change how we ontologically behave, all the symbols and the symbols.
  
  That being said, the cartoonist/scriptwriter can do well to know about narratology, patterns of narrative that can lead towards a structural understanding filling the semiotics with. There's only so much praxis that can be accomplished
  
  
• Experience machine would be a bad time, Brain stimulation reward is a race to the bottom. (Here's the thought experiment)
• I understand the tension of deontology/dialectical materialism, so I may add the capability approach to making Marx compatible, John Rawls had an approach too, ain't touching that. Can't read all literature.
• (Experiment here)P-Zombies aren't real due to the Gradualism of the mind. So it becomes a natural phonoma
• Moral Realist, Experimental ethics yet with model science can't answer everything, non realism can be entertained though. Still up.
• Structuration of aesthetic value: While subjective outsider art exists. Welfare is meant to help the mid-class with the enhancement of the productive forces. All part of pluralism.
• Gettier justifications being fully complete: That's where true justified complete belief comes in.

Stuff I don't have the foggiest, difficult

• Mathematical realism and non realism : Sure, evidentialism could suggest a discovery of counting, yet such a thing is up in the air.
  
• Qualia: Fascinating area of study, haven't specialised in the theory of mind that much, leave that to psychologists.
• Time Theory. B and A theory. Seems fun! Still a hole in my foundherentist framework.

Boom, that's a life.

This is post is CC BY-ND

A solution for Ai-identity, Anti-trust Egalitarian. Links.

Rawwr Kyro is doing his ranting here with notes on Tech Journalism.(If you're new, check out my other notes on AI and licence in the search bar)

I must do this the strawman to feel carthesis to my audience.
(image from Deja 98 Rom hack)

"MuH FREEDOMS'n HuSTle'n  Propyright rights MICKY MOU-"
(oh my, this have SIX FINGERS??)

CRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCNCCCNCN Free Palestine! (Thats the thing, ain't it? It's not so simple as a dunk tweet or a microblog post It merely entertainment right?)

Let me clear some conceptual confusion.

A little petering out with News, welcome to journalism. It could be going completely public domain as things go on. The denialism and copyright self abnegation a defeatist dead-end, especially with the copyright-lets-be-under-the-kind-monopoly-of-disneys/nintendo-content-id-drm sort. I feel like I'm talked down like a child by westy liberals.

As copyright there to consolidate the distribution into capital.

‪@tentacle.expert‬

"SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"

 Aaah doctrinaires'n the anarchists, what to do. Always leaning in the sympathy of the Anarchist. Nightmare, asymmetric enforcement. What will happen when DRM and the commodification of scraping by big content will do? Will I'm not affiliated with that union like Lenin was. Class character first.

Are people in for a rude awakening once this DRM is applied?

Also, ain't Eddy Zetron and his bubble narrative bogus? NFT =/= Prosumer Gen Ai. Well, I've never listened to him anyway. He's still wiggling Coe? Meh.
...

(Now that I thnk about it, encruddificaton seems more like a absurd concept, even when I wrote about it. My hypocrisy alarm bells of a contradictory axis are going off. The only thing he's doing this is for his self-service now.)

I'm using my right in the editorial that hes... infamous grifting. The nft/genai comparison has done so much damage to the discourse. I've written about

Oh, he's got a diaper burping fetish, at least with my entertainment I put it under the legalese that it's fiction. Guess he's still doing his rounds a corrupting the entertainment industry.

He's name-searching and sending petty malpractice insults. Why is he the prophet and gospel to anti-ai dogma?

I'm outta there! No more digital nobel savage. I'm the excavator.

Well visual media has its own drawbacks, cartoon discourse ain't conductive, and it ain't hiding the malpractice of the dog piles I'm seeing on Bluesky I don't know why I'd say this. I'm not going to answer the dismissive hustling, it's not for me. Such is a mob rule and the wilful disinformation now.

"Just let me work! Anything. Desperate. Make me silly mindless entertainment. Do whatever specification you want sire, anything to serve! I want job. I need to prescribe as-written instructions"

Texas sharpshooter Fallacy anyone with this discourse with the talking points refuted?Does microblogging facilitate it. It's why I don't post some of these blog posts there. The biggest danger is that the discourse and comprehension they are getting are from a meme, and that's the discourse now.

Twitter and bluesky have destroyed discourse so that's, why I try to limit myself, it's indulging in the techmonoplitic manipulations that Neil Postman warned about in amusing ourselves to death.

Please, denialism and hustle ain't going to answer this question west, expertise going to lead ahead. "It's boring and it will go away!" Nope. I learned with the NFT stuff that this stuff is still present.

Oh, Even now, it feels like excuses to hustle more.

Even with the crash, will it be lose-lose (that's how a doomerist views it, I take it as neutral continuously.) 

This article goes into the prosumer, marketing terms design for direct response and says these are statistical inference.

Or not, this site says it's within the reach of knowledge and the emergent intelligence, or it's Inference of curational decryption matter. Arg.

Link on don't be a A**hole of impossible principle and ideals. By my reflection of this thread on Tumblr. Paternalistic inspiration P*** will not be tolerated within my platform.

I'm going to check the nuanced AI feed and do check out the for you feed too which is better than the discover feed too.

(Oh, I look and try and digest takes) Such as this retweet. I don't retweet in bluesky because of the fickle followers. You are one of the good ones though, who can trust an editorial and an opinion and not a short, quippy and wrong dismissal. I'm entertaining Neil Postman's amusing ourselves to death when I'm using that format.

‪@eleanor.lockhart.contact‬
another thing people don't realize when they fantasize about "the AI crash" is that you're going to see a *lot* more slop and harmful use of AI whenever the big companies do crash, because the crash would drop GPU prices drastically & make cybercriminals etc. training models much, much cheaper"

Oh, that is an idea with all these marketing predictions, something to take account for a preparation.

According to this Test which I felt it was polarising and misrepresentative, I entertained it again. Did my own Ai-identity, which reflected my one and only position. You're free to take it.

Many takes on the thread. Another Typology as an intuition pump to understand this. Well, it's a Cartesian graph again of positioning marketers use.

Find myself in agreement to this.

Now as Anil Dash with his own decentralised AI models that are plural, is it forbidden of Green version? Remix culture'n all that I lean on.

He even linked to the video, antitrust leads to trust, I take it.

Welp, Good luck with that with Really Good AI. Kyro will do what he does, Squashinghe west military industry complex.

I'll prepare for a new doomerist movement. I'm not going to associate with this anti-vaxx that's left coded, it's malpractice. Not much vision for the future other than the eternal present. This will cause hijacking and destruction.

‪Key 🗝 🦊‬ ‪@keytryer.net‬· 2d
Current anti-technological trends have no imagination of what the world looks like after this. They want an eternal y2k and an artificial ban on computation. "It doesn't matter if you cure cancer, if no one can be a doctor anymore." It's bleak to me.

Unless we build an alternative.

There will be, as an antitrust egalitarian I propose a right to the city

oh look my EFF stickers have arrived

Regardless, the discourse has regressed on Bluesky. Thank you for reading my rant.

Zach Weiner did this neat-o gag.

The Stone Mural Project

Abstract, expression of multi stone. My artisan group has done this. Soaked bowls of stone and then plastered onto brickwork.

Thanks for the mosaic abstractions!

 

authentic;artifice artification

From W.place live

I must consider the antonym that fits best, Obscurity for Clarity feels more fitting, along with now, It's time for authentic opposite and more symmetrical reasoning, if that means anything, triad or quadruple reasoning will have to rest.

What's artifice? Is it necessarily bad?

No, It's got no free will, it's only through its functionalism that we can ordain its purpose, it's not fair to treat it like an autonomous thing. I can't blame it for anything, Its responsibility is that like of electricity and energy.

It's all a tension and release. With no consciousness, the designs of the de- of the orginal users here.

Users of work schedules can be good or bad, if not personalised, it can be bad, each accordingly with the mileage that can vary.

So boop boop, or, it's something I thought with this video.

40 min, I'll have to comment on this again.

( Especially on the intrusive thoughts, as for unsolicited advice. Some good, some disagreements with the dystopian/utopian fiction, here'n there.  )

Welp, yeah, I'm doing a philosophy student again, I always go back to thinking about thinking, aren't I? I could to it all day. Meta for Clarity… Oh dear, obscurity. No wonder advertising has influence on other sites.

What all this consciousness and neural networks with Ai is showing the oddity and credibility of the chinese room experiment, so I'll go further.