Reasons for the creative commons here, except for my oc CG.

I have written the most naive, incompetent essay for an idealised principle. Yet,

I believe it.

Because they can bog off with there intellectual  smoke-blowing and haughty snootiness of false consciousness. Bears repeating. His spirit possessed me to make the 

Acknowledging the good'n bad. We are not going to take your toymakers away, from commodity toy to art. Drm is drm, I won't tolerate snide worship of.

Slide from the a French techno company. 2 hours it's got politics all over it (what do you expect under an editorial.)

by Conspiracy Theories, TechnoFascism, and the Prospects for a... | James J. Hughes, PhD,

A compound workout of and the biceps and triceps of a bench-press 💪🛋

I've never seen such.. a lack of humanity from the confusionism 2023 megacopyright landgrab, and it comes from the 120  media apparatus of 50 years the fissure of the age tradition of 100 tradition of academia (older).

This won't get along, they will be conflict.

The censorship of free expression is so foundherently wrong that it's worthy hill to die on.

The laws of the Internet shall make my wisdom immortal. Information wants to be free, and beware those who wanna gate it.

Information wants to be free.

Even with the taint of interpopulist dilemma's it has.

his statue website

Wow, that functionalist description is out-dated as I go with Maggie Vale.

Yet everything is a pure though a internet own boy.

Also, Cory Doctorow in the past, was correct about DRM here. I need to compile it all for the internet artifact that this will be discovered on here.
Transcript of that. There's not good social media, so I'm going to keep this in home base.

Mediocrity and the death, by Seth Godin.

All the data here, ain't it special.

The question remains.

So the ideal of Arron Swartz shall live through all of us, monistically.

That Retweet threat that made me quit.

(Naive that I may be, I know that this may be ideal way. Yet clout, social relations and it's operations, I know it's not going.)

I confess, in 2025. Somebody _____ retweeted a death threat and made me depressed for days, on microblogger. It ruined my day with ideation I dare not recall. Had to leave at that point and consider alternatives. There is no sensible discussion, mindless dogma had ruined to internet. Like the mens rights/gamers vs the feminists back in the day.

To the one who thinks accused and taking it personally, do not, your are precious, and I wish not ill will and harm on you.

I'll be fine. My former Kantian ethist within my several years ago awoken within me. With all the reactionary tech-panic radicalisation.

It's locked within a audience capture, circularity, entertainment vs academics/intellectuals in my field then the totality of the spectacle. Something I pruned out of the for you feed so I could not get stress other than the tiny monopolies of something that ain't essentially contingent on a non-dialectic, on the essencilist of the spectacle.

With the need to transcend it.

Then, Substack with intellectuals, non-intellectuals, kidsters, I know that place has bad bloggers, it's one where academics are and the essay was, the written one. Still the same kind of moral panic with perceived job loss, which is why I made that couch-searching treck between philosophers, economists and political philosophers into an idea.

Will it matter that I decided to learn'n teach instead of fight.

Of an ambitious quest into understanding and trying to help a big-gap of those

Idk what to do with that knowledge, out of the moral desert. That i come to admit now.

If i was to blame the im-an-ally-not-bigoted-buts mindset that drove me out. Along with the American exceptionalism. Something felt wrong and my for you feed was the differentiated.

Doesn't matter of mental responsibility? What we are dealing hear where it's a eliminative mind, yet it miraculously has a mind! The pattern and the phenomena is the capacity to express a compatibilist in this regards for a simple question of ethics.

That's where i started to study that due diligence of sociology academics, left accelerationists and a relational companionists, oss programmers, transhumanists/bio cosmists and out of deontic reverence. Simply because I had enough with the polemics of the mass media and its lap dogs with the open source and it's proprietary venture capitals.

With all these dualitys, I haven't interviewed any billionaire, decided to make my own mind up. Out of the dialectic essentialism and into a former deontic past. Into a dialysis, or to explore an alternative, that's what resonated.

Somewhere 2024-25 I left here, with the For you feed of others.

Is this where your catechisms and constructed beliefs are? A deontic circle of peeps who got what they want. Perpetually, unpersuasively.

That is the curse of free will though, you have to acknowledge the good and the bad and recognize it's desire to exist.

This is how it feels like a techno-progressive who does not use AI ATP with the news. Welp.

Yet I'm too ahead of this when I knew the terminally only peeps.
Jeremy Bentham with the discourse being stuck within sunk costs within america
"If you want to know how AI will affect the world, don’t imagine current AIs simply continuing on into the future. Imagine the world being flooded by AIs that make our current models look like a child’s plaything—and those being used to build the next generation of AI. Imagine, for the first time, creating something much smarter than humans. I don’t know exactly what’s coming down the pipeline, but it will be strange and terrifying. We are summoning digital aliens into our world, and we are not ready, and we are complaining about the water they’ll drink."

Some politely unfollow me at this point. That's good enough, wading in with options undiscovered is part of the price of connectionism we exist.

Now that I must disrespect intellectual property by acting dumber and more gaggier. With a less attention to the punditry.

Guess they can do this if it's means have a sensible discussion. There is none

on the vulgar popular polarizations on the hustle funnel that microblogs encourage

Oh, and to work on my compatibilism bridge of economic transformation of this. I'll follow Flazfire's advice with art. Such is the futility of this in current year.

Beyond Bwubbles, Onto new analogy

This everything is so fast with the concept of the bubble coming in 2022, I've decided to move on with a new state of economic transformation in iterations. Something that IDK what is happening

• Ed zitron. As far from the rumours that the bubbles got the pop with embarrassments, and with his news later, which I have no influence over along with no kinship.

• Peter Thiel and Mark Anderson and the and copyrighting have taken a different approach to the bubble, saying it's going to lead to abundance, said whole Boomer, utopia of some kind well, or something idealistic of that nature. Nah. (nope) 

• The concept artists themselves fake with the copyright nuke. Think that the bubble will just automatically extinguish, including there employer Disney. Itself into a world of ultimate peace, it's still long going, it's getting more tropeish and predictable by the second, ignored in the low Tier. On that corners of the microblogs that's where it will exist.

• The YOU WILL LOOK SO INCOMPETANT WHEN IT POPS DUMMY by one of the intellectuals on substack I quoted on substack on cloaster. Nah, one poster came as supremacist. Idk something else. It felt like more a showboat rather than a manner to like it. (Post edit, he's went 180 and hates it too with the job annihilation job disappointment,)
  
  
  
  

The most plausible from a solitary cautious optimist, through the different variations, that there's going to be a quiet revolution of academics and other thing that is the one that feels the most plausible bubble right at this moment. Quiet with agile firms.

What if it's not a bubble yet? Other self reconstructing Bridgestone? The llm compatibilism.

One trying to reconstruct and build together once with each new filter list with each block and reconnection of construction. Blocks and discovery's from the connectionist substrate, to the reconfig an return and overlook of the relation of elite and popular, and the return to a natural duty.

When that comes, it's a matter to reunite and see which from the commodified community's that are made, it's the populist de-emergence of the matter of the integration of society.

So as a left accerationist it's going to be this meme

Back to the equilibrium, from a synthesis of many and one.

On lolcowing

So Sarah z did

What can I do with that? I new term of the internet with the way it operates have given me this name.

If I get dogpiled or that, or that, I know what has happened me.

https://bsky.app/profile/sarahz.bsky.social/post/3mmx3h2mec224

With this cussy video out

The same thing with Will Stancil despite him putting his desire to shoot himself in the foot at times with the other types where the polemic forms not at natural law, yet the need to dominion and to win within a contest.

The weird fetishism to make him into a lol-cow is an odd one indeed.

Craft atrophy?

This designer essay was bring up a term.

Along with its adoption

Guess the firms and or entrepreneurs are out there trying there best to create a ruckus.

I'm wondering if this is the brain damage thing reiterated? So I'm going to dismiss it again.

Yet the lie goes around while the truth gets to put it's pants on, so the hustlers got in early with there conventions being established. There really in the forefront.

Yet with it all the matter to bring in, it's paradox, does not matter since natural expression, simple and basic radically, continues without regard of the powerscale of the instruction of the industrial education.

So it does not even register.

Are you in the weights? the beep boop

According to are you in the weights. https://intheweights.com/

I'm an obscure Australian celebrity. Wait, thats not right.

People pressupose this is copyright infringement, i guessit isnt.

So yeah, you can check, even with my dent, guess I've made a impression, you've got to calculate that with how likely a bad actor will misrepresent, be it a collage artist or any copy'n paster. That dystopia of intellectual monopoly is a manner that I'm not following.

This may be incorrect as Seth went. 

Epistemic or it could be speculated and annoying as I'll get more coseire with 

On E_ Zi_____

Or Infamous at this rate, this is vulgar populism at it's core. Link

Is this anti-science? Anti-ecnomics? I've already points the way he treats his other technocritics.

"I want to clarify that I never claimed that OpenAI is a profitable business, or even has a good or sustainable business model, but simply that this data falsifies a big claim that Zitron has repeatedly made. He seems to have moved the goal posts to claiming that training costs should count toward the gross margins, but that is a totally different argument.

If you make money from your customers on average, you can grow your way to recouping even very high fixed costs. If you instead lose money from the typical customer, as Zitron repeatedly contended, then growing more will make you run out of money faster. This is an incredibly important distinction, and getting it wrong for so long (in the face of reporting from the Information, which Zitron favourably cites elsewhere, as well as independent estimates) is frankly disqualifying for a commentator on AI industry economics."

The comments on that is really what this has become, neither critic or booster/hyper

Why do you debate them? Because no, That's why. Look at the comments.

This has escaped sensible discussion and the ruination of organization within disorganization separation of populism and elitism of ideas inter-connect and naïve noble-savage can happen, yet with that. Tech being art in the aristolian sense, that we have to inquire if these are any serious matter or another vulgar critic of crassness to discard with Bull**** jobs that of socioeconomic to regard.

Cynical AND optimistic of attention

Sales funnel logic with it.

Cynical

I doubt this guy citing that 60% study is a mere extension of our former tv with direct response compute and the art of that being tantalizing with it all.

Direct response compute = Metrology

Everything else = Mereology

Measured to felt.

And Optimistic

Yet with podcasts and other stuff, we are intaking a lot of different sources through osmosis. Guess the attention 


It's a matter of the engaged attention and the ethereal attention

The second renaissance predicted Kants greatest misery for everyone

I'm taking my thought experiments from popular thoughts so dual praxis of foudnherentism develops into my monist conception of the physical world.

Transcendental idealism

How can we disprove something so magical as the interrelations from the probability and possibility of the conception of thought and the discovery of the mind of reified abstract consciousness. Even if Kant was disproved, it provided a framework for consciousness and man.

This was the lack of respect of the deep pluralistic reality of the great consciousness reckoning and interaction, then into divergence into the teleology to ontology.

There a humanitarian discussions by academics that are way better

its so quite 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇪🇺 all this debate?

Why am absorbed in the mwurica in this debate? Why are south countries taking account of all this?

Because spectacle, that's why. Or the spectacular labor of the west,


To quote

"Mwurica believes in the inconsequential ENTERTAINMENT of partisan womps! 

expect this theme for the next 5 years
To the others.

This had with deepfakes (could be mistaken identity too); others I've

addressed here.

Notice where the attention goes though.

China hmm.

Source: Free Systems and Politico and 2024 ips

"

Because, why o why, do they know that I have to go out, and why I don't debate raging bulls, since it's wise, I guess, sapience, and salient to seek out other voices like Abi Awomsuo

It's a matter of Anatta and self-elimination and hearing voices, and all the awareness that brings to it all.

Such a way is me understanding collective expression in foundherent of the individual.