Break the dialectical treadmill

Better best Better

What a manner of Hegelian ascent into another being of potential.

Yet, with such experience of external materials, easily hyper-measured, now's the time.

To the ascent of infinity

Crowd pleasers

 

The crowd-pleasers and the polemicists behind a block.

It's time to know when to not pay attention to all in their backyard.

Such is the case with plenty of writers, illustrators, and freelancers in the realm of agnostic non-curation. Where judgement outside is seen from an agentic algorithm deciding who to see from the firehouse of potential relational nodes to connect and separate.

So, is the public again in disorganisation. Seems they will always be

The crowd pleasers.

Production status quo ante freedom

 

This oneirophilia of our commodity relations, huh? Escapism for mental health.

Constraints against enthropy

With a reflection of this long essay on the theory of mind, Not, with memory not storage, but with the mise-en-place, cheesily tautological place of the genre loop, it's made into new forms.

Framed as an uncomfortable truth, or is that what the hard determinists so authoritatively declared as a compatibilist? Regardless, I had to dip my toes in with the Dennettian naturalists that happened to move with the evolving theory of the mind.

Or my own natural interpretation. This is the telonomy of mechanical functions apart from my teleology goals of the mental superstructure.

Yet, with these attempts to understand the matter of mind and interpellation of the way that leads towards knowing how to understand the telonomy and biology with a rigorous consilience of the epistemology.

Well, well, there I go with academese again; no wonder fantasy depicts them as mages of esoteric signals.

Natural and conventional law

Abstract Expressionism of a previous aristotelian writing now 

Ain't that a defintion thats non-eliminativist.

Is this where the platonist ideal from, doxatic plural opinion rests? Natural law being what the eliminativism leads into, or what harlen Ellison calls " i just do what they want by tuesday, take the money and run" specification.

Oh, am i not being charitable to the cogs of economic reasoning with oligaric manners, i digress.

Convention is social and phenomenon, protecting specific expression.

Natural is telenomy.

Foundherent Naturalism

Ontology pondering time.

Fundamental is a placement of a materialist ontology onto an evidentiary base.

Coherentism is a web structure of an overlayering of a superstructure required to shift the presuppositions of the structure beneath.

With aesthetics and poems untouched by the episteme of scientific inquiry, only the phenomenological enquiry into realist/nonrealist endeavours. Beyond interpellation.

All this relationalism grants completion, and with that, endeavour.

Overplotting

There's not enough, yet at the start of the project, thrash first comes with the mess that will. A meta-intentional matter to make before the start of a project to bring it to life, with everything, no matter the meta-economy.

What to do with all those ideas? Well, it's going to be one incoherent picture that solidifies into a new one, and with that solidity, it comes within what may be.

Then I look at Seth's advice, the pragmatist, and make Byung El Chun reflect on Western thought.

"Thrash early, then lock down decisions and don’t change them." Well, that was advice of the CEO mindset of executive dysfunction within IP little sectors like this one.

So where it is, it's like laying the land, personally claiming whatever, and seeing how it refines with the way it is in the world and responsibility comes through. That's what a plot in the literal sense could mean.

Surgery check up of Hernia

Please let this placebo by quick, and this surgery be graceful.

So many writers, so many words and concepts I'm catalouging.

With having to push up a lump up into my gut from it slipping out, Could it have started with a deadlift? I don't think so, regardless, it happened with.

Pulled an oddly wet sponge right up the belly, even the truss can't be contained. 

Pulled it up and wiggled it from the bathroom floor.

From the sofa, in the covers.

On a yoga mat.

Outside of a inner flat with cold air of a tugging of a vital artery I had to maneuver.

Bunch of tubes into a tight space, then i pull one out.

Then with a pop in, the pop back in.

It wiggles back. More than 50, lost count of the chronic conditions.

It's like a octopus that slouches out of a snake with and it does not come back up.

Here's wishing for a swift surgery.

"Don't act like a celebrity till your successful"

Ernie Bushmiller said that.

Is this what is meant by the internal theatres of seeing all these monopolies of traffic going by? 

Some get it, some don't, with stigmatised viewership. Lacking foundations and foundherent justification of the reason with the conclusion showing up on the feed.

An opportunity of conveniences of masses showing up like this. Not rhyme or following the law of non-contradiction. Although that's necessary to distinguish between coherence and incoherence, it isn't the core to live by.

So the ineffable mystery of getting a hit remains. Of the most relative things, the algorithm of the first empirical insight, not the understanding and wisdom it leads to underneath. Such a discovery beneath. Don't follow any growth-recursive YouTube channels, and learn direct response offers instead. Along with qualitative unmeasured cultivation. (or what the commercial firms calls brand) ]

React streams = enactivism

Enactivism is commodified, so that's why it will always have traction.

The most casual journalism there is, like this one, may not be the best, even. I don't know if I can reach that moment of passage. So they flow with all the time with metrics and traffic.

As with all isms, there is a mindset that precedes a philosophy of consciousness with the mind, with essays that I'm reading right now, even beyond the scope of the sociology of this.

So granted, these computational metrics computers use used to be a job; now it's a deal to lead a way that's ineffable and immeasurable. Or such that an irreplacable something within man makes it beyond such an essence granted with his natural expression. Yet we have our own sociologically and psychologically determined interpretations that intermingle.

So the immediacy and the emergent properties that I'm not proprietary at

(Further note, wow Seth Noted the computers where speeding up in 2017, even with his call to action to my least favourite book, Lynchpin.)

Cruel Clown show

What a show that will others believe they're owed entertainment. Owed amusement, owed kiddie pool play.

Such is a means that will never end, of large waves of attentions economies that will move in and out with much whimsy.

Fame, Infamy, and Attention Economising. It all happens at once, performance metric hallucinations shake like winds. Commercial platforms yearn for it, long for it, and call for it.

Now, I shall quote, as we go through this circles.

Dyna Soar 

"One of the worst things that can happen to an artist is becoming unintentionally famous on the internet. Nobody is in control of it, and when it occurs, it’s a completely destructive force that endangers you and your work due to the nature of the majority of people online. The macro-level behaviour of social media is sick and twisted and directly/indirectly pursues the suffering and torment of others as entertainment. It doesn't seem to matter if you “embrace” momentary celebrity or not. It will punish you, hunt you, grift off you, and make up stories about you regardless. There is a sense of entitlement from the viewer that they are owed entertainment constantly from you. That all work you do is immediately “open source”, available to anyone, and ready to make a buck off of. Any rejection of this is considered elitist and antisocial, and the acceptance is considered “selling out”. You can’t win and in general, nobody I know that has had the spotlight thrown on them really wants that. We all know it’s horrible."

B- bonus. If you haven't already, you can look of Signifiers in the documentary of the entertainment industry. Or, with how social media is treated like one.

FD signifer 1:12 with racism content warning. 

Beyond Commodity Relations

Modes of production and commodity relations – all that affect our cognitions and extensions. This could be the bundling with the trying to capture the meaning

That was what Althusser was about when he examined dialectical materialism, which has gone through sociology and economics. Yet the fixation on such an ontology can only lead to blindness, sub-blindness to the perceptions of all phenomena and interpretationism, from the literal matters. 

Thats his diagram of, I follow the crosswordist image of cosiliance

Simple and complex pleasures, by utilitarian Jeremy Bentham. That if a philosopher is unsatisfied, then an animal wants more of that inside-out desire. The banal and the elite – yet to the postmodernist, they deinterpret all meaning into non-hierarchical demergence.

So, no wonder it makes a case, as people rejected such questionnaires.

Yet from the pragmatists, and even by extension of liberal policy. Then comes a time with all the useful fiction of easily measured money and eliminative materialism.

I lurk now, and the audiences of other posters who go on TikTok and do these 

Pleometric produces.. odd work, and with Neural Fizz, Arika and the Amoebas.

@pleometric

"do people watch this slop?" yes and they love it. The thing about short form is that worse is better, things are meant to be consumed, discarded and remixed into new strains. The slop is the point."

Really? So worse ? Better? Or a sweet desire to post and define practice in another area of distribution. This workerism, defined as Immanuel Kant's miserablism and John Locke's conception of property as a monopoly of deliberation, is only going ot become a different conception of ownership.

That's okay.

Notes on Cosmic dash

These are the first impressions of the webcomic Cosmic Dash.

First Genre analysis 

Rebellion bad/status tragic, thriller/espionage/status admiration good, Action holdout prescriptive morality testing

Archplot – 1 Maru 2 Kracker 3 Dash

Demographic guess (generalising here): early teens - 30. No adult audience here. Psychographic science fiction fans jaded by Star Wars and into Ratchet and Clank media-wise.

1.

. Ai as adversial force was the force here, my personal fave was hal-9000 and Bender from futurama.

. Twist on the mad scientist cliche, the tragic scientist. Bittersweet Kimney could use an additional scene, including bucketbot.

. Amusement park, entertainment, Bucketbot! Comic relief.

. Hive mind got it coming; well, it's a cute act and could lead to more complications.

2.

. Orthos had screen time, along with Kracker

With the empire being the adversial. Sombre with Orthos.

. Package felt macguffiny. The infiltration plot felt more sincere.

. Would of liked to see Kracker develop afterwards. Can only draw so much screen time. So understandable.

. Abstractions of backgrounds and intense moments nice touch. Compared to the concrete reality, did not mind at all.

3.

. The father's mercenary life is the adversarial force here. A grudge of a throat.

. Old master is the one with a save, Maru with a matter, yet is Dash holding to principle via not killing? Fave scene: the last flashback, all complications considered.

. Wonder how Dash could have broken a wrist.

Conclusion.

This is Teen stuff, due to the reality complications of being a teacher, David now does freelance and serialised novels. Shame it's underrated. That's the price to pay when everybody can commercially copyright.

The last one I read was the most cognitaiment.

Confusionism

I guess the GoFundMe way of trying to bribe copyright extensions won't help protect small creators.

Not without the endless copyright trolls and all that. Oh well, guess I'll be ignored. It's a cautionary tale of being too terminally online.

That's the point with ulterior motives and motivated reasoning; I have it with myself with my own erotic intuitions. Yet I know that blind faith alone won't carry a good case.

Surrendering all stigma to the traffic metric

On the streaming services.

Fishing for attention, competing for it, warring for attention, for all to see.

Moral knowledge becomes falsity when the origin raises the pontificators' views the wrong way, and then they lecture.

With a product, service or policy, there's an incentive to lie, generally speaking.

Yet direct response, eliminative materialism, virality, celebrity endorsements – that stuff that I had to hide in the brand world of e-idealism.

Oh marketing, and the infinite regress of anti-marketing, how it manipulates, how it drives us. How it leads us. The lowest comprehension of a stratum.

incoherent, inconsistent, incogent, incongruent, incohesive

Reading Susan Haack's coherence, consistency, cogency, congruency, and cohesiveness – don't go overboard! To add that to the crossword mindset of syenchism of 'pragmatics'

I don't know if this is the one hustlers use to dismiss and race to the bottom, yet here we go.

All allowed under the suspension of disbelief and unreality. We are allowed thought patterns with the credence of our monistic attention to the circumstances. These are the elements. That comes from the spectator and for the prosumer spectacle, to the consumption of hegemonic thought. Spotting each point so that the suspension of our own phenomenon reflects the character's mind, our third-person omnipotence.

The pedantic Co's may not be the point.

The banality of diapolemics

So he is stuck, within statsis of all things that happen to bring him the torture of the cogs of the lands of wanting to be a anti-woke YouTuber nitpicking pop media's nitpicks.

The pundits have beeing going back and forth, I happen to this

It got me thinking of this link, of tackling infamous pundits for the sake of it.

Or the saying comes with the commodity relations to our intangible, qualitative attention.

🛋💭

Oh dear, we've reached the bipartisan hacksmanship of our entertainment nexus, pundits and PowerPoint punditry.

To what extent will these continue with this micro medium of the attention imperative? Everybody, to some extent, is copywriting and advertising to some extent in a contract propertrian.

Mereology of Aesthetics

As with cartooning, the ideas and conceptions adapted to for a new state of creation.

Reduction flatpacking to establish holism with the attempt to move the improvised beats to scenes, to sequences, to acts, to a completed novel. All this relationism, from coherentism to incoherentism, and all those effects rest on the imagined dogmas present under the legalese of fiction.

All in suspension of the fiction.

trying to measure virality

The ideals travel without concrete form, unmeasurable concepts.

Often it's nothing; often it's everything. It's an external macro phenomenon of it.

Unable to grasp.

On plot:Spectacle C.Dereck Varn

Memory of C.Dereck

This is a comment:

Being an entertainer, I can only find the concepts of Harlan Ellison's The Glass Teat inspiring to create literary entertainment. This concept aligns with Byung-Chul Han Cognitainment concept with my craft, I seek to make it into the creative commons. I can only assume our old copyright framework aids in this diffuse atomisation, like you said.

With all the cargo culting though.This may be the limits of our meliorism, granted with our social apparatus of these platform capitalists, left to our own devices to raise consciousness.

So I can only think of connection while still at the tension of these commodity relations as an edutainment creative class owning the means of production. Then carry on.

Seeing the normalised advertising and commodifying proffesion left to us, along with the subvertisement. The only thing on these platforms is locked within. It's arguable that with all this automated white-collar work now, it's going to first to go. It's a fascinating subject that came from aristotle of plot:spectcale, Robert Mckhee's argued in one of his craft books there is no distinction.

I guess we will have to move on with commodified para-social relationships from platform to platform. Thx for the talk, been doing my best to inform my praxis while not falling into the pragmatism traps.

More on entertainment, good and bad. I've read about:

Harlen Ellison's The Glass Teat 1+2 And his speech on toilets
Byung-Chul Han's The Good Entertainment > Those are goof
Robert McKee Character
Nicolas D Villarreal a soul of a new type

David Foster Wallace talk on consumerism > mid
The Attention merchants : Tim Wu

Neil Postman on Amusing Ourselves to Death and Technopoly. ( I don't know how long those ideas have lasted) >Negative

-

Team Britannia, Team America World Police redux.

Inspired by this review of Team America, and comparing it to Rogert Ebert. Both reviews create a paradox on non-contradiction. The editorial and the number of institutions that sneered or the ones that embraced it with the academia's own view.

Despite the vulgarity being on the course with the duo. This has aged generously. If not due to luck, then due to playing the improvisational game of turning what was once a sleeper hit of non-judicial spaces into a cultural touchstone.

So what can I learn? Epistemic luck and being at the right place at the right time is still a thing; you can't count on it though in the studio. Improvisation, planning, overplanning and then the curtailment.

They will always be cheaters and gamers, social media gamers and all that industry plant react stream banality at any polemical tension.

Even now though, these polemists may have become peace-makers or diplomats; I haven't checked on their body of work of the later seasons on an LS mark episode overview.

"I'll promise i will never die" anticlimantic moment.

Confusion Matrix

Unrelated to a peanut calling another viewbotting, yet idk, what Seth says about cheating applies. Along with a dishonest game of publishing out there.

There's a machine learning term confusion matrix, or 'viewbotting service', and it includes spell checkers and the AI detectors not working.

So, even with the variables of all that. Cheating and all, the attempt to short-term to game and opportunities to race to the bottom are always present. Not going to deny. With the terminus of behavioural patterns aligning with thad

Ignore the vanity metrics.

The crass xwitter spectacle of provocateur oligarchs

Each and every day, OpenAI and grock, these two are the ai companies that suck the most.

It sucks since it's due to the provocateurship, the ones that took an accidental discovery to an annoyance. Is it that when China releases something, Twitter artists (derogatory) throw pretensions and now? Two billionaires act like clueless chickens.

So yeah, this is in response to Gio's response to Anthropic to the defence party; it was a kerfuffle.

Ain't GyenSynder a left populist, btw? Oh well idn follow her.

No good sex scenes??

What's with this article.

I was comfy scrolling on Substack and needed to write this. This was followed by a Kink by Not Art. A Madame Bovary, I'm going to get put out; the west has this odd, oxymoronic way of for and against.

I know they have their place, including objectification and sexualisation. To the point of unpleasant saturation with Chuck Palahniuk's snuff. Or Lila's bitter short surprise.

Yet is there a conceptual middle? To leave the condescending lack-of-trust Ensmuttification (whatever that means) and the prudish Hays Code of respectability? 

Well, you can do plotless porn here, no worries. Aliterate audience will eat it up, reduce literature's serious slowness to consumable short beats then call it a day toll done. Nonliteral moments of satisfaction with the curators of those doing their thing.

No meaningful relationalism, just a mere exchange of physical attrative forces. Of overrated thirstrapping and a one-night-stands. Cohere only

Unless

It's to overlook and own up to the mass market mediocrity, then try to seek something hyper-specific. From Golden Boy to the novels that I mentioned.

Or don't own up to it, the barest duty. It's the internet. Cyberspace can feel like that. No taste or chance. Or commodity relations.

Whatever it is, we are still going to see sex sells, for better or for worse.

On Piracy, not on stipends or royality.

The anarchist zines happened, with all the contradictory ideologies along with the

Oh look, an anarchist zine library with all the points of disagreement, yet with preservation of knowledge like the Internet Archive. I'm not sure if I'm going to read them all, yet here it is.

I'm not even an anarchist. Given that these ideas are meant to spread, with my fair share of disagreements, it can get too anti-dom of a sort.

It's all research of a sort not fitting for a microblog. They do share a view of ip law abolition, though.

They may call me tankie, or that term, even though I identify as a hobby sociologist.

Current license opinions, of civic DUTY.

Couch Gregor, resolves. Also more Beep Boop because why not. Of all the law terms.

Are they going to know this is extrajudicial? Okay then.

• DRM is bad; it absolves civic duty. I have a mind that can informally judge ownership
  
  
• Ultimately, I have to conclude scraping ought to be public domain. not private equity or government. Any readjusting of IP law to fit their interest will lead to injustice.
  from the notes, fair use/fair dealing and public domain.
  
  
• Commercial firms ought to have their copyright reduced. Specifically Disney. Vertical media outlets should not have monopoly power over non-profits and freelance business acts. (Disney does not care about non-profits, it can take a 
  
  
• Protect Public domain, virality is a crapshoot other than the direct response platforms. Celebrity endorsements vertically travel at moments at the algorithm.
  
  
• Since there's no accepted conventional definition of plagiarism, it can be debated ad infinitum; it's infinitely generative. Conceptually and abstractly. So lawyers are needed for agreements. Yet the agreements themselves can become overwrought, so a handshake deal works best between client relations. (This ain't natural law, hence why the court and lawyers exist )
  
  
• Keeping the idea of the idea/expression is a useful fiction.
  
  
• Freedom of expression + Right to oblivion > Copyright. Since state-sanctioned monopolies don't need the first two, since popularity isn't needed. There are cases of unjust profit entitlement/fraud, yet they are always in favour of concentrated industries, so anti-trust first.
  
  
• That being said, a freelancer can be a case of vulturism, yet there's way more vulturism by Alen Dean Foster and in other cases. Creatives are losing their design rights out of silly clauses. (It's always disney/nintendo.)
  
  
• Nobody should make a living as a copyright troll, completely.
  (These are all my unforced opinions.)
  
  
• As time goes on, we are going to see more indefensible conceptions of the anacho-capitalist concept of self-ownership (If somebody does it, someone else will.) It's simpler; nobody does due to public domain. Non-binding and unforced with not statuatory.

These have been informed by Tom Scott, Patricia Taxxon, and Seth Godin [2] and Technollama, a technically proficient lawyer, and Geo

(If you want to check the law notes. and recreate advocacy groups)

The fun fun fun of the most frustrating arguments on microbloggers. Of the draconian copyright law.
oh This too. I feel like this is becoming cope bait. Again, too many bad actors hijacking.

Despite all these notes, I'm still keeping my, possibly last, zine's production untouched.

In laymans terms

The first impression may the only thing that matters, when the outsider blocks or pays attention further to the facsimile of the auto-advertisements of social media, something birthed through the direct response mail order posting, from
Lester Wunderman.

Is that being deflationist? Is that what they mean by streamlining a heuristic of attention capture?

Well, no one will pay more attention to the first impression of one's work than the creator.

Pop goes the impression, as Satoshi-kun says, experiential to the immediate and the moment of long-term expanse. That's one way to look at it.

Non-spiral of chronic dealings

Still waiting for the surgery of that hernia; the best way to have it is to stop with the nocebo cataphrozing.

I do realise I need to keep the feelings in that there will be a surgery room, then a gas mask, then me waking up with a new scar.

With that in mind, what is there to worry about? The letter was supposed to come in January.

Yet that can say something about the health system.

You are forgiven for your bad opinions

There are people that are never convinced.

Bit the golden apple, shoot themselves in the foot, litigate silly doomed cases.

Yet a kind and generous couch, can overlook those mistakes. Those errors

Everbody, except the ones not my Christmas card list, can be water under the bridge.

Well, except the ones who claim freindship rather than be a acquaintance. Or doesn't scab union stuff or copyright doctrinares/trolls.

status/situation of centrist status swirls

Hey, wanna be banal? Want to have no opinion? Want to be nothing?

It's easy money, a sinicure, a cush job.

Merely exist, then wait till death.

What's that? No opinion.

Well, that's what a clerk happens to do, or what happens with low self-esteem.

Sit on the fence, try to be proud, yet not, and take the commodification word too seriously with amoral patterns. There are hills to die on, and the one that claims and ontologises everything and nowhere on a base of solipsism arrives at nowhere, with an opportunistic meliorism with that mentality.

Oof.

Unworth

Critical ignoring and certain concepts may not have been important for a book reader who's happened to keep his social media intake low. A qualitative opportunity for banality or a canvas of expression.

Or so that's how it's supposed to go. With the prepositional manners and attitude of.

The image of the thing, the spectacle of the thing, within the manner comes from the in-sync and sync states. Scheduled and paying attention to what's in and out.

Oh, an A-axiology feels tautological.

on the lindy effect

The Lindy Law

Reading self-help advice of crafting crafter for craft. The way of the meta of meta. Self-referential.

WITH NO OWNERSHIP Welcome to the creative commons. Are you surprised?

So much intake of consumption of content with the way it's like it's got that way. Industry complex of condescension on the front page, or am I looking at the mindless entertainment in infront of the front page?

This is the best the place has to offer.

Then you have to protect your attention.

Then with manners it goes. To look in the other places.

Abstract/Concrete

All the abstract mentalities, of ideas and non-reality, and all the physical reality. To the amount we take, there are few qualitative degrees that warrant selection.

The physical expression and the ineffable idea/conception stuck within one's head. Unable to be expressed until it hits.

There's that design, with the idea made into a digital and analogue expression.

With that in mind, such a way of trying to squeeze blood from a stone is the dialectical approach that happens.

Oh, thinking and reflecting on the idea/expression dichotomy.

Do self-defeats matters?

Pedantic consistencies that make way for intellectual victory and self-defeats; not all self-defeats matter, only the most foundherent ones.

According to the way of saying so, when hornets' nests are kicked, when the direct accusations hit and the hunting gets under one's own skin.

Yet, with the masses, they do seem to matter. From mob rule to normalised good ideas, they do exist all the time, with no adultism or condescension.

The only way is to move through and see if all that little points build together.

(Of course, with litigations. The coherency and consistency matter more there.)

Cruelly Eliminativeist and cruely Empiricist

look at all that logic and physics of what some may call business. if there is a physics to business, there is none in the qualitative side, or the burnt embers

Why I'm against it: it's not fun not having beliefs and sensations.

Crafting crafter of craft. Rather than the unique one. To the way that the origins of things aren't unique.

All that scientism is any ideological commitment and an attempt at universal appeal. Mindset of a production boolean value.

A job of bean counting. A job is a measure of the sunk cost of wrong measurement, of Pavlovian frameworks circulating into themselves.

Such is the status of old money and cool money.

Catechisms not contingent on

With talks going on and on, exchanges like that.

I wonder how many read and take literature and the formation of themselves and news through the oracles of experts. Then that way, through there insights, it will lead to a new turn of know-how, to being in the know.

The produce with the service to advertising.

With no contingencies, there is no need for any attempt of casualness; they all go and vanish away from the disposable chatrooms.

That 1%, out of a direct response. Could be oblivious, and that's okay.

Even the lonely ones leave on the Substack. Unable to sell a copy, the attention drought is with us. Either stuck in short-form video trying to get engagement.

Comparing it to a hamster wheel. Generating and accumulating raw datum of the insights landing randomly on.

Not all tantrums are worth it

Certain arguments are meant to continue, held in a circle of audience capture.

What's a self-referential feedback loop, self-contained? 

Thousands of curses, thousands of crys, thousands of going down the line.

Then there's really than real, or verisimilitude as the likeness of likeness; I prefer respect out of a duty fervour.

The lies, the truths, the ways that they weave when I curate and place a moment of reprieve.

Why do I tip down when I go round an ruminate? Then there's the moment where it's brought back, and I'm stuck within Parkinson's law.

There it goes, down, down and right the way around. I'm looking at something realer than real. Is that what consciousness is within the head of an impossible argument to transcend and to touch an abstract visualisation from the concrete reality? That's hyper-reality.

Not a touch.

On Art & Fear 1000 pots

The little data coarsened with the data made. Then it pops out.

What does it mean within AI? The interactions? The ideas? The way things and virality happen on the internet, what does 'better' mean? What does meliorism matter now? 

That's the idea: the one who produced 1000 pots other than one perfect pot was better, apparently. That was the study. It could have reflected on the method or the means to produce more content or the means of production of perfection to make a single piece worse.

Yet with all these word comparatives, is it so that to judge a ship of Theseus, it's remade into that new non-value? So it's made into another status object that will lead into another state of being for another?

Regardless. All iterations, though, are made in that manner;
that's been another one.

Ain't pleasent enough

All those minor iterations and alterations, of somewhat could be considered.

Little bit here, no, remove one here.

Move and make it to the end.

Not the end, and all the way it's like that.

No,

Yeah,

The ideas work here.

Then what's visualised, then what's here.

The work or hobby craft

little bit of hands

Little left

done


( wow, Seth is still rambling, Why am I still fumbling.)