Holding on

A 50-year copyright reduction stops the human commodity value. LLM training, fair use, and into the public domain.

Reject the ownership of anarcho-capitalism. Oxymoron. Calling llms Plagiarism machine is also an Oxymoron.

Independent artists seeking alternative means of monetization. That isn't contingent on social media attention/clout economy. Scarcity in that leads into audience capture.

Decentralization of antitrust, labor protections. America won't learn that.

Focus on human autonomy and its many iterations of many valences. Of Bounded pluralism.

Etherium and Tez are proof of stake and do not hurt the environment, and can be done in hypebeast rugpull manner.

Honest metrology that isn't the base rate fallacy.

This is a mandate.

This will be held in 2028-9 till I think.

Dark abyss

 

Swirly Dump

 

The purity of the impure

The Golden Mark

 

Infinite Alphabet

To the extent of following old knowledge of diffusion and seeds, such as this construction of epistemology, maybe I can connect this to Susan Haack's own knowledge work of the crosswordist framework of foundherentism. 

But applying such a simple thought to all these matters to find oneself is such a way to learn about the knowledge that is away from that.

So today, and with such a bulk of our knowledge and know-how, what can we honestly do to figure out from the institutions, and now in the LLM era, that I have no other discernible reason to understand? 

This is where our general concepts lie: knowledge is discovered with the natural metaphors.

Ownership of social knowledge should be simple. I laughed when I read that training disclaimer, because it is the exact same issue as Google Books. We really do not want to go back down that road.Oh, but look at that. I don't think he's responsible, so who cares?

To the conditions of the various modes of how knowledge is made and transferred into various modes and forms within economics, discussing it, there are laws of how things grow and diffuse into other things through institutional mapping.

These memes are then diffused out of my cognitions and beyond our things into this weird metrology of numbers that we can call social media. And with that, our understanding is only individual, and the collective outside is just held together at various indeterminate points, unable to be comprehended.

To that, with the diffusion, and also with other things in cryptography, it is becoming weirder and weirder. The laws of DRM and other practices leave me confounded, and it drives me tirelessly.

This could be a mixture of mid and god, so take it with loads of knowledge and how these transformers' historiography carries on.

Economic crash-corse

Like Freddy got fingered, I have concepts! Concepts. Ideas! Ideas, got to think in numbys. Sociology and others

This one if for the artist/commercial illustrator;graphic designer

Gotta collect them all collage em all

No idea

I have no idea yet this is one.

No one will read your work as closely as you.

And that's okay, I guess.

Sad Dissapointmemts for the controversy

 

Data stream

 

Taxonomy on the qualitative differences on the little groups.

Personally, i don't associate with, 

Angry sticks

 

Overflourish

 

Former self, calling you out.

 

Against dopamine addiction

Dopamine Addiction!

With the techno-panic, I see this constant usage of the terms 'dopamine addiction'. Yet we go back in and out of these systems and social media, and we know that we are taking part of a deal to have our data harvested, including on Blue Sky by Steve Bannon.

Both Cognitive Wonderland

"Because a scant few years ago, dopamine was being referred to, regularly, as an all-round good thing. We weren’t just experiencing happiness or pleasure anymore. No, now we were ‘boosting dopamine’. Which apparently means the same thing, but it includes chemistry, so it’s more official. Or something."

Including Nicolas Kircher on the chemical mind

"Furthermore, in 2025, Berridge was able to demonstrate conclusively that it is possible for an organism to want something that they severely dislike by directly manipulating the mesolimbic pathway with electrical stimulation: using this mechanism, they were able to cause rats to feel an overwhelming motivation to bite on an electrified rod, causing them pain and discomfort."

This even connect back with the Dopamine

Derek Thompson business newletter weighs in with the smartphone, though.

"But here’s what nobody talks about: The people who deactivated also knew less in general. They came back measurably more ignorant about what was happening in their own country. And in a second, larger study of more than 35,000 Facebook and Instagram users, the same thing happened."

Aaah, Yet Change Technically. Did one one of the ways how dopamine can be misunderstood?

So what is with the intellectualism and moralism with all of this? Another part of this that's part of the layer of the techno-skeptics. 

Missing the Kant's Misery for everyone

Seeing this repost a lot.

That's not how it works.

Since the functional mind (Global workspace theory) is meant to draw a sympathy function with that of the input-output. Then it's a of understanding.

What that Animatrix of the second renaissance was a of dignifying through the transcendental idealism (or, what they like to call, sympathy.) Then it's a matter of time.

The book nomming of Beep_Boop

Of all the things, Plopyight is responsible again. Yep.

How small is the beep boop conversation?

Remarkably small, out of the typology weaved.

On Batterys

Not related to Beep Boop, yet still worth mentioning.

Moore's Law in the Congo. To the past of the reporting

3 years ago

As with everything, the due dilligence and tend care, this america moral panic is not targeting, it's so bread and circus and can't take a hint, that it's not the centre of the world anymore, where's there protests for fossil fuels and other larger contributors?

Other than the favourite IPs like didney and bintendo.

Got that from an AI-assisted author that faced another harassment campaign since, of course. He

"AI is not the boogeyman it’s being made out to be. It is one piece of a vastly complicated global environmental picture that includes coal, textile waste, cobalt mining, lithium extraction, single use plastics, aviation, shipping, and a hundred other industries that generate far larger footprints with far less scrutiny. The people demanding AI be singled out for destruction are not environmentalists. They’re opportunists using environmental language to fight a cultural battle they’d be fighting anyway."

So now I recommend the batteries that are improving their supply and demand. Welp, Clean energy and green tech is worth of support.

On dealing with the ungovernable midwit

Well, that's a term I brought up with an 18th-century economist. Left of the bourgeoisie, right on the aristocrat.

1th the internet
2th 2016 gomergoob
3th The Sarah Silverman case.

Shows who's who with wanting to destroy the internet archive and the odd double-speak of getting rid of it.

Are they related to the copyright maximalists, I wonder?

Pure evil

Embarssment as entertainment

Social media does that

Not even close.

Hernia self check-up

Abstract Doodles.

I still have a tinge of pain coming from my scar there, but it's all right. It's all right. It's covered in fuzz; it's been growing back nicely, and that's about it.

Dumping Human Spam

I had to use another sneer, because Joseph is not even using ChatGPT, but the fact is he is just such a bland intellectual pabulum guy—or an intellectual-grade kind of commodity-brain stuff. He is never direct.

I will give him credit: he may have given a platform to other people, philosophers, too. That is the stuff I would appreciate. And his video against MRAs is delicious. 

But, again, he could have done this supervised, with editors, and on display.

Watching President's Sunday critical theory, though. All things being equal.

Even he criticised the way his manner to making the way as a publicity function.

So that's it, with publicity figures I can dump if they don't deliver.

No critical theory is perfect though, I know I'm not that of a hegelian circle.

Populist discussion

We may be a populist slopper myself.

Idk this guys voting preferences

This is why I have also foundherentism, folks, because I have no fixed fundamental points. Within populist, mid, and elite mentalities, it all monistically travels back and forth. A mindset along with the material conditions.

Yet with fluent internet speak and lingo, I still tag him. And with him, like an anime villain, a villain I see eye to eye with.

But am I a villain, too?

Does the dialect tension matter? It's going to end one way thanks to the totality of the spectacle.

We will have to deal with our own populist tendencies as the way forward.

Discussion within the west.

Property is coercive

Wow, is the moral panic still going? Well, since the randos on BlueSky are commenting fiercely back at me, I'll just put this here because why not? 

This one is for the beep boop, and it deserves reiterating.

Yeah, I don't think it is. America's irenicism It's a stagnation; conflict is life, and even if I ironically point out the mistakes this tension has, I may be branded as a target. So I'm going to hold it out as the RFK of the world; therefore, this way is the new anti-vax movement.

Got that from the anime horsegirl lover...

Trying to artificially limit the supply of their favourite TV show. There harry potters, there

Its like, thanks west, thanks west.

The culture of the Narcissim, of egoist desire

Various Lacan Refutations and gags are shared.

Yet with this way, it's like our own ideas and eyes to the manner of mental diving, it could be capital, and we could leave it that. Yet with that with how society functions.

Yet this one is with the lack of imagining of the past and where things go forgotton, where the spam goes, where the ideas go.

The romanticised family and how, in a way, it essentially reflected another anti-American kind of critique of culture.  The things that resonate with a rustic sentiment of wanting things to stay in the past, even in certain liberal critiques and other ways, and how those things get recuperated and brought back into the fold.

One could always call this a return to anti-intellectualism now, and the Glonzo theories that I keep hearing from the microbloggers as I try to do my studies.

Family theories, too many family theories. But the concept of narcissism, with roots going back, and how that concept itself has become another quick grift of hustlers with a feverish entitlement to profit and plenty of justifications for that profit, a perverse incentive. 

But oh, what a surprise. There is not even a simple idea anymore that cannot be sold now as they take it up in the arms of this new, ongoing culture war.

Going to have to hunker down, even though I know it's not going to be the case. So that's my first impression.

Ways of seeing by John Berger did this critique better

So now I'm going with that audio book with various intellectuals in substack as this moral panic passes.

Shameless hustle and anti-hustle culture

Work hard or work not. There is an external force out there that cannot be impacted by your work, and that is unaware of all these things. 

Is that how connectionism works? Or labour? Or the un-found labour? 

Seth Godin always said, 'People like us do things like this.' Is that relying on external forces? Is it that my aesthetic autonomy maximises, or is it the agency of that thing? 

With all those things going together, I am seeing that the way of virality is blind.

We keep warning

They keep not listening; there will be blocking if this ever happens

Influencers are the princes of the media monopolies.

Proprietary DRM is a reactionary capital tech.

LLM/Ethereum/cryptography are anarchic tech.

2022-23, and the anarchic fireworks, and, boom. 🎆🎇🎆

What can be reclaimed?

That's the fact remaining, of the mid-wit now, and endoursed with these subtweets.

Destroy this industry for me

 Had to watch Harmful Opinions; did not know his voting habits. Idc. Not that presumptive.

Idc about the language taboos now since I'm a dignitary to the internal rules.

So happy to view other views through independent research, even though I don't decide to be an independent researcher.

So that, with his way of thinking that "gamers deserve the worst" oof, the blame game, whatever the ritual negativity and all, and trying to explain with the pop YouTube scene, is making me jaded.

So, the delusion is that as LLms are used averagely and specifically, there are many cases I now see with academia and the cancel culture that will be with it all. This is the way we cope with the interchange.

The horror of the spectacle

 when will it end

yet disinformation

falling togtether,

repeat

Either your using the AI (Global workspace theory) or it's using you.

Sunk fair weathers

Random business owner, good takes though

What may happen.

I did my best to try to be reasonable, yet now it's going to be more ghosts, more giving less of a cushion, and more careful curation of my feed list.

"I had to block mutuals since they were sharing techlash editorials since they could not know that much." Another leftist programmer, well, progressive, as in 'progressive' can mean many things now. Regressive to progressive to one signal to another.

The crack in the window of the atheists with the crack of the window with 2023 cannot be undone. It's why we can't unite, and that's good.

What are we doing now? What with our own minds with the Cult of Reason and the religion of humanity, all for the symbolic capital of copyright maximalism.

What are we on.

plzdontkillus Cybersecurity encounter

Oh my, oh dear, as I engaged with the subject, I got on an odd subject, refusing the cognitive surrender myth twice. With the capitalist left from the 18th-century midwit tendencies I've tried to avoid.

What ho?? On my substack feed.

So I decided to move my hot gay butt to attempt to continue to discuss AI in civil contexts.

This of the safety bootcamp
Along with that, I tried to get in with the odd question of the cow.

There was a myth about dudes and a community of practice, despite it being dismissed in the programmers microblogs. Ones with other blogs of the way safety should be treated with the goal of educating or shouting to the public with what it means to deal with the new era of ai with america defending its intellectual and copyright property owners

to quote

How english it all is! Polite buggery! I've already argued with the conceptual distinction deciding the debate.

Alignment-by-default versus goal orthogonality on the Cosmos Institute

Yet, with others that I look at in the safety research, then there are others in uk having a manner of ultra-politeness to the current moral panic.

Recommended Robert Miles Ai Safety

Is this it? Graphic design is so quirky n' frumpy!

Well, I did my viral, game the system nonsense and all that marketing know-how; it didn't work with all the direct-response compute I got, So nope. Despite the pretentious mini-publishers' celebrities/influencers not taking notice of the latest popular trend. Well liked for its well-likedness.

uhh

Okay I'm done!

Got my email

what

It's interesting though, they direct me to videos on the blackhat. Like this. With indeterminate oopity driving the process, you draw your own thoughts.