Horizon of Expectations

 Horizon of expectation , that's a new concept! It's of the undercurrents of our collective subconscious.

The question of the first impression, all crystallised into a fine amount of constellations of dreams and symbols made into certain impulses and intuition. Connecting into a social purpose given.

Weaving in and out, it's discursive circles that are meant to serve an honest hack's work. Deliberate within the intention. The distinction of between professional/hack could be and entirely non-realistic. Commercialism is brute. Being a hack for the right reasons, oh ho ho Tautologies are unfortunately unpersuasive for deals too!

Let's leave the business/economic questions, divining into one of the things that fuel under creativity. So many other than monetisation.

It's one of the things that ain't epitomised by.

One of the tasks of the freelancer to connect with unsympathetic users.

Heteroglossia : On Genre

 As with my dabbling with languages, terms come, expressions neologised as concepts crystallise, reflecting "in terminology" of yesteryears. Moving on with Heteroglossia.

Weaving the linguistics, from Arch-genre, to Sub-genre, to various stages, to the formation of our meanings and back again, it's a literary marvel to behold.

With that of the meta-in-of-itself that can defy any generality and specificity. Such a means of commercial editing shows that show which to either capitalise on attention and their hold.

What concepts, what ideas, what stuff no copywriter can uphold. Yet, with me and others being the enlightened within discursive circles. This is why the literary entertainment could be the highest form, which will always be better. Nothing is that memorable from that quick-shot place of dopamine culture.

Sure, whether these concepts will funnel towards are fictional entertainment, retaining into concepts of our culture is another matter. It's certainly been a fine, literary dive.

Such terms of sociological understanding, Even though the concept of the horizon of expectations will be needing its out post of understanding. Despite it sounding like a final fantasy villain.

Action Deconstruction

29:50

We poetry in from the start of western civilisation of writing, when everything is articulated as poetry from our thoughts.

When it comes to entertainment, there's a moment when a poem and a satire becomes a biting commentary within the genre that's talked forever to come, with one of the ones that stand out and critique the genre. Along with doing the edge work with the creative soul lashing out.

There are plenty of war games that are indie that hit hard, yet not like this one. One where the entertainment is subverted into a what is the master of art and the mastery of the human soul. On a most spiritual transcendence shall it be triumphant.

The favourite part of the game is the quotes other than the out-of-moment realistic condemnation, including the deserter ending.

How will the spectacle be the thing, though. Commercial Spectacle-driven vs Literary Character driven, does it exist or not with these productions. Did it the art still exist.

The character contradictions are shown with the accusions below. This is negativity used to help use 

 To quote from the wiki-quotes

• How many Americans have you killed today?

• There is no difference between what is right and what is necessary.

• If you were a better person, you wouldn't be here.

• It's time for you to wake up.

• Squad commands are unavailable when you're alone. No one can help you now.

• You are still a good person.

• Can you even remember why you came here?

• This is all your fault.

• Do you feel like a hero yet?

• To kill for yourself is murder. To kill for your government is heroic. To kill for entertainment is harmless.

• White phosphorous is a common allotrope used in your slaughter at the Gate. It can set fire to soldiers and the innocent civilians they are trying to help.

• It's Konrad. He did it. All of it.

• Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding two conflicting ideas simultaneously.

• You cannot understand, nor do you want to.

• The US military does not condone the killing of unarmed combatants. But this isn't real, so why should you care?

• We cannot escape anguish. It is what we are.

• If Lugo were still alive, he would likely suffer from PTSD. So, really, he's the lucky one.

• Adams blames Walker for Lugo's death. It's his fault they didn't leave Dubai when they had the chance.

• Walker's obsession with Konrad has brought nothing but destruction—to Dubai and his squad.

• There is no escape.

• Life begins at the other side of despair.

• No one can help you now.

• Collateral damage can be justified, if the gain outweighs the cost. How much do you think Adams and Lugo are worth?

• Freedom is what you do with what's been done to you.

• I exist and I find it nauseating.

• Walker and Adams have served together for many years.

• You can't go home.

• If the Radioman now speaks for the 33rd, then what happened to Konrad?

Villainous/antagonist ≠ mesmerism

 Repulsion does not entail Mesmerism, not the fictional kind, anyway. Unless Hypnotism is a kink. Attractive Traits don't lead into positive ones. That's what is made for the tension to occur.

Such as the snake oil it could be, what antagonist force of a goal's want or desire is going to be made clear with the writing of the plot-structure and the character structure. Like with all things made with conflict, there ain't going to be any peace when. 

The anomie be it rising and foreshadowing, not within the anti-plot realm of jumping, static.

Attraction and the non negation really is one piano key being played.

Symbolic Libido, Hyper.

A quick Touch-down on a kink.

Etymologically, it means beyond, yet beyond is another way to say symbolism. Symbolism need the antithesis of the factuality to work, for the wish-fulfilment for the beyond ness. The one-dimensionality is the point with all the flatness. The part of legend, myth, and tales that makes a character part of the mystic, rather than what was a more non-romantic writing movement did.

The non-contradiction is the point. The Arch-typer of sexuality is the point, the 'other' is the point. For more reading on symbolism, Richard Mckee has it on Character.

There is no swindle, with what's displayed.

Empathy-Sympathy-Antipathy

Empathy: Identification, Worthiness. (People like us do things like this) Relatability. Pinnacle of axiology. A benefit to keep on. Helpfulness. Prospecting. Stuff that reminds us of use and 

Sympathy: Likeability, Attractiveness  The boundaries of axiological helplessness. A cost to keep on. Exploited.

Antipathy: Dislikeable, Cynicism, and Pessimism. Worthlessness. The antithesis of axiology. Repulsion, The boundaries of axiological cost. A burden. Cruft. Sunkeness. Exploitation.

By @rickgriffin.bsky.social

As Tension is brought between empathy and antipathy. The but of it, and not therefore. The contra of the protagonist, or the antagonist.

Pursuit of literary entertainment/The medium

This is what Harlen Ellison with all his attempts to play of works, that was his end goal.

Literary Entertainment. Is it an oxymoron, or a paradox? Literature does not need to attract or repulse, he simply needs to pursue with the distinction into the world of metaphysical creation into the world where when need to see it. From the raw intuitive impulse, into an idea and into a medium.

Edutainment is a thing that we have to wrestle with, the paradox of attention of the thing that draws the eyes is the thing that can detract from the message and themes.

Well, the attention economising of everything for influencer ad creep has always been a thing, makes the analogue experience of picking up a book then reading it. The medium with what matters of where to place and select which has the learning increases.

Semantic Satiation and Ruducto ad Absurdum

Reverie of all those blips.

 Repeating something that won't make sense, tautologies that in its circularity don't make any sense.

Tick tock with a fad to trend, to trend to norm, then mimetically it all travels and normalises into a concept within our culture.

Are the repetitions deliberate? Or not so? Reductio ad Absurdum is used within comedies all the time. Moving into a farce from parodies. First time has it effect, second time it's expected with half the impact, the 3rd is a absurdity.

Yet the rules of three do form a pattern, where the connections make way, it can go either way.

The law of diminishing returns comes all the same.

Narcissist Mythopoetic

Theo, Diagnosis of his contradictions with his story.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZFQG2e87ZU

57 min essay

Since when pathologizing has reached a myth, poetic symbolism used to sell a story of defeating an arch type of evil. It's all myth though, it's dream-like of wanting to believe of the stuff behind the ideas. If once a theory of the mind, the soul, made into the intellectual call to actions.

Yep, another dance of scientism. A complex, of unity of opposites of the fight of good and evil, and the contradictions of symbolic conflict, of old time. Solipsism, egotism, self-interest against the empaths, wage the wars!

All of an outdated physiological diagnosis. All attention to the attention god of direct marketing glamour mediums! All hail, beyond the complications of reality, people do still believe.

It reminds me that we are the minority of how these explode despite the fundamentalism, despite the foundherentism that I follow.

What contradicts self-obsession? Well, Self hate and suicidal ideation. All these are thoughts that intersect with reasons to reveal a more human condition we see with our own identification with others. The simplest definitions are going to be stuck around with that community. Guess it's not for me.

Forced to post, amidst the literary agent.

Look what I'm doing, avoiding a literary agent to pursue a non-profit career in public space.

Well, it's always there, got a blog post. I don't necessarily believe the agents are bad at finding opportunities, merely a neutral. Of course, they are meant to be made the whole place. If it's a backlog of plans on my mind.

If this traction is never going to work, at least I'd own the means of distribution and the attention to my place has been in a nice place.

Sometimes gentle thoughts of a civilisation that the ability to own the a little private sector of the net is nice enough.

Jump to Sex Obligatory Scene of Erotica

According to Lagos, there's four types of the conflict progression, static, jumping, rising and foreshadowing. Realistic/Symbolic characters encompass rising and foreshadowing to prove the main controlling idea.

There is a desperation, and the libidinal search. Even within illiterately, it's wish-fulfilment with all this kink-exploration. Indulgence, as all art is, self-indulgent or another.

Is it all oopity for anything long-term than a beat or scene, though.

The point of erotica as a genre is to get into the pleasures of the flesh first. That's what it is, it's what's on the wrapping package, for something to be subversive is going to be a supporting story of any subtextual element. Even then, when it comes to these flashes in the pan with intimacy, it's most likely remain as that.

The jump, though, is what I get what makes it anti-literacy. If it's all about the radical prude subtraction.

Prude-Sex addict/passion for passion's sake is what have you. The sentimentality with arousal is the point. Sometimes these response rates draw commercial publishers.

That's what makes it. What were you expecting? Clerk-matter. May as well lean into the exploitative aspects of the hiddeness, then move on. Some have compared it to horror with the frights.

Long-about way to say that this is a duck test for porn. I know it when I see it.

(I'll have to check the Hot Girls Wanted on the documentary in regard to the adult entertainment in the race to the bottom. There is always something with the sexual sentimentality. )

Semantic/Semiotic Ascension

 

Rest in peace Danial Dennet, discovered his death.

Sellars said "The aim of philosophy is formulated, is to understand how things in the broadest sense of the term hang together in the broadest sense of the term "

Wow, this books dances with physics and risks becoming a deepity when going against a deepity. I love it, this slither of a point of view is to be understood, even if it leads bouncing ideas of certain intellectuals, (such as P*****) i did enjoy revisiting these ideas, such a culmination of meta-understanding.

There is only the meta-philosophy, or even non-category philosogy. Let's not get too deepity in our literary work.

He blends physics terminology with naturalistic study with his conceptualisation. With an understanding of the intentionalism, derived and original as a passageway towards his argument for free will compatibilism. Intellectual stimulation that brings me back.

These concepts are going to stimulate me back again.

Now that's meta, such philosophy really show the strength of the written page medium-wise.

Dialectical conflicts, dramatic writing

Despite the essentialism and certain explorations amongst character arcs, nobody's can explore conventional conflict. Realistic or symbolic. Lagos does it like no other.

This is for all the purpose of realistic/mimetic character representation, One it regards to writing conflict, which is the term to show other non-conventional means within the character.

Conflict, contradiction, complex, and paradoxes. How do you write it within a character that's both convincing? Such an expression that is proud of? Well, The amount of work it takes to make a creative tension. These polarities, how to articulate them have been a common theme from the Richard, to the Rico, and towards the Playwriter, Egri.

Villianifed roles, archetypal

Since there's a vilified role. With the symbolic representation, there's an inclination of from archetype to the end of stereotype.

Of course, it's depends. Case-by-case. It's going to take a lot of writing to identify with that role, so the level of a solitary protagonist. Just like What Vladimir did with a paedophile at Lolita. It's only one of the literary challenges that we are face with, remaking our concepts to either condemn or champion a symbol with a new dimension. Only when the amount of the way of description and connection could be made that sympathy is invoked at the right time.

Challenging ones indeed.

CEO
Cop
Secret Service

Oh, it's all in fictional entertainment, there's always room for on-the-nose symbolic condemnation though, you never know when it comes to the market!

Memetic vs symbolic, thats going to be a theme for some future blog posts.

Negaphobia

Wow, My doodles are getting skeeeeetchy Should I quit with the doodles?

"Lemonade? Please.

You are my best friend"

Catharsis, interpassivity, negative states of being must be explored to provide a means of conflict.

Be it contempt, hatred, death, and the most radically evil darkness of the universe. Everything must be not touched.

There's a thing in advertising called negaphobia, where the tastes of being good mannered, or people covering their own butts. Fixation of conventional manners, educational etiquette. Hackneyed serviceability and the like has led to a lack of conflict.

From school of coddled brands, covering the backsides, and the oopsy daisy.

Unless the conflict is static or jumpy within erotica or radical antiplots. I doubt this format of reinnovation has become a dependence. Commodified like the rest.

The scum bob wiki is the perfect personification of this negaphobia, a stakes and negativity had to be ironed out in order to fit a chocolate box, beaming and.. Repetitious.

The anti-plot, or anti-story existential plays such a Waiting for Godat, and Krapps Tape also point this out, They're more in a non-profit art sense though.

When Mean-spirited and torture is defined so broadly is means anything without anything, into the non-entertainment of slice of life and wholesome.

Man do I miss stakes like the Boondocks or the Smiling Friends.

Lagos Enri for Realism Dialogue of conflict, Robert Mckee for the more symbolic, on-the-nose dialogue (Including some other examples). Scumbob wiki? Nah.

This cussy documentary of a youtuber MagicMush that I have mixed opinion is what I referenced, I'm only it for the kinship of the autism that I have. 30 min, I'm refereing 8 - 15

Cliche hatred - Bad?

 As nothing is original, with adaption happening, moving our ideas into new mediums and forms. That with business, there's the option with our ideas that are meant to be interpreted through the infinite hermetics.

Everything is adapted and original again, done before, then placed into a new pattern to draw new leadership.

That's the long shelving space of distribution of our net does to you.

Then there's a cliché, with clichés being beautiful if executed well. Being Tools, yet derivative is easy, unique is hard.

However, in business, formula and mechanics are leading towards the dysfunction of a business models that we paradoxically rely on, it's the nature of the beast that's complicated. Beyond modernism and post-modernist thought, the avant-garde spirit develops through the post-entertainment lands. 

Let those patterns be re-made and reinvigorated into new purpose.

Anti-Lore

Reflections on this Anti-Lore of refinement, 10 min read.

The poster of Xwitter clarifies this ain't against backstory, it's a commodified idea of the sake of it, most charitably.

Is the commodified churn into the circle of SEO and unoptimised idea of discovery and virality.

This is all the refinement and cutting room floor process of revision of a thousand stimuli to one with refine idea into a finer point of synthesis. Especially these character thoughts that have been doing.

Is this an idea of the futility of rebellion of I.P of Graphomania of an in cased idea? Not really, all of this is free, and I'll be doing another idea tomorrow, these fixit-doit-changeit ideas are for your intellectual entertainment. These ideas, these 'lore' or backstory is always going to be back, and not the forefront of my ideas to be made into what is to be considered worthwhile.

All the seamless times I'm feeling like a mere hackneyed illustrator making against constraints, assigned by my own boss, which I'm following with this curse of the free internet. Being free to write what may.

All the mind grime fluff that I scrape and put out here into words, right here and now.

This is all yet another revision, to economise our ideas with effort through the paradox of less and more.

Writing shall be part of our art, and art our writing.

There shall be our own attempts to coalesce and condense several meanings into neologised with each span of times.

Have some of the books I've read been unnecessarily extended for making money? Can't think it now.

Storynomics, the omnic dissection of brand

So when the ways of getting into our eyeballs, for return because it's money, it's always money. Other than the clarity. Robert McKee of course brings his take.

Like it or not, this is a business book, a keep-yourself-in-solvency book, a watch-your-business-or-somebody-else-will-book. The strongest moments at the start, where is comes with the disillusionment of advertising, both as addiction and as deceptive cunning. (Adcreep, Addiction by design, and Attention merchants are more comprehensive in this description.)

Then it comes for advice for branding manager on how to evoke an attention-pulling device of taking the gift of attention, then giving a gift back. For this thing that's forever contested and many-definition thing for profit. Trying to argue to attempt for more humane advertising campaigns, campaigns to get our attention and to talk about its products. Another intake of the escapist stories to storyfying into our cultural consciousness.

Is this growing another hydra of attention mercantilism with our own. It is a crawling of our consumerist undercurrents, to be made into the prosumers into proprietary rent-seeking behaviour? Ownership creep at the very core? (Rhetorically)

Well, we have a challenge to be vigilante with our user-interface design, then.

Useful definition in regarding brand vs authorship, to identity. It's aimed at Cheif marketing officers and reveals such a mindset, with the (er) ai endorsement to the end. That's where it started to peter off.

Syntopic conclusion (Include the amusing ourself to death.)

As the physical law of cost-benefits comes within, so will be the incentive for 'more' with this articulating into our business philosophies and materialistic desires. Business is about turning humanity on, will the science of the cost is about turning those off. All to our capital and basic trading of a profitable trading.

The freelancer can have its uses of primitive branding and calls to action, constructive. Yet with the entrepreneur they will be times when more and more layers of markingtese, expected returns and beauracratic weaving. Ah, the industrial age of workerfying and ownerfying, all to make our systems!

All the markingtese that will still have its credibility due to one metric. For, cost, for benefit.

R.O.I R-E-T-U-R-N O-F I-N-V-E-S-T-M-E-N-T

oh how has it's ad creeped into our social fabrics.

Internal Battle for concept positioning

 

Forgot about this book when I was doing copywriting. Of course is a book, a marketing book so it proudly proclaims. Wow, so no wonder that podcast was called "Everybody hates marketers"

Thing about the branding/individual strategy of the freelancer in understanding how to be the best in the world of something is what is made into the mind of the user in picking one for trust and attention, this goes into the why somebody may select.

That's what started the niching up/down trend of selective actions and behaviours that are designed to be pleasing to somebody, not everybody. I can see why this influenced Seth Godin's specifics and he knowledge of graphs to the point of emphasizing remarkability. What a way to make a difference when the author did not like one book and he went ahead anyway, or so I've heard.

"You can't go from here from there" Chapter has a sobering poignancy of the Swimmers body Illusion that is made. With certain places in people's mind cannot be reached today, of how numbers distract with fanciful cogs of status beckoning of a greener tomorrow.

If I'd rank it, not as mind-wrapping as Seth's "This is marketing" book and Jason/David's Rework.

Dialogue Robert Mckees

I'm running out of morale for doing these. Bear with me.
I did say I don't have to do these doodles? Well I never.

There are parts that are made really work, and other things that didn't. Can't wait to check out character and action in this upcoming series of reverse-engineering. Is this entertainment series of learning worth it? I'll decide.

I'd choose story grid over this regarding storytelling staple.

He's continuing his idea regarding scriptwriting story. Going with Shaen's recommendation.

Also, these books seem to carry on to the end of formula and it's pattern of direct response to finding a way to work. Then it's creative tweaking, none of these reverse engineers pale in comparison. So what it's like?

Alright entertainment and analysis of scenes and conflict. Undergoing things that can make writing on the nose with exceptions to the rule. Notes from Charles Dicken at the end and along with means tell/show and handle exposition, Shawn Coyne having his influence of storytelling.

Skip the outdated non-sequitor show don't tell.

The tension he examines with the soprano's scene works satisfyingly. Is that how balanced conflict works and is catagorized? Fascinating.

Word rating of short-term boilerplate analysis . 3/5 out of reverse engineers, swamped it in notes and then moved on.