Serious law lecture, from Immanuel Kant and philosophy, they shall be made.
Sturgeons Law
90-10 of everything his crud, the law of mediocrity. Mediocracy! Well, this is the Law of Slop. The law of Kitsch. Where monopoloys of random monopolys appear, and then the publishers scoop them up, then it all happens again. How do they intersect with the economy, and with choke points.
Habeus Corpus
You may keep the body or so that others can't be compulsively aggressive with crimes of wild passion. Clowns running into the bank with anonymity and death threats with harassment are all a wild passion.
Erga Omnes
The deontological where it applies internally to logically make sense, in order for the conception of consciousness to exist. (Pretty deep and philosophical, I know, abstract stuff about the mind and the phycology I learned as an atheist. )
Internal, ideological consistent, that's duty and deduction for ya.
Deontology adjustments to content ID, learning/access rights. Those don't meat with Kantian second categorial imperative, to be treated like an end rather than a means, with consciousness not accounted for. It's foundherent to law theory.
Cui bono?
Who benefits? Well, finances may not matter in terms of the appeal to motive. Which is a informal fallacy, (Reasons need to be provided for it to foundherently matter)
Appeal to motive where two lawyers and their pay cheques enter within a case does not account for the validity of the case.
Appeal to motive with a grifter like Mike Hearn selling the fitness frog/ab wheel is another matter, though.
De Minimus
Got this from Cory Doctorow's copyright cases ( Although I don't think averages are technically correct) another, Nobody want's to read your *S---* within law. The eagle does not concern itself with flies. Pertaining with minimal things, systemically with the environment. As it contains to structure of the large pictures, which extends to the metaphysics of property and of energy redistribution.