incertophobia/incertophilia

Oh certainty, does not exist within this editors-free digital age.

Those who love it as with there are degrees and then there's probability,

From the Georges Moore the open question (Which has been critiqued from various schools of thoughts) Yet I do believe in the process of Quine's irrational sciences

Such as publishers try to find a magic wand to manifest hits or that somehow that it's suppose to manifest an instant influencer deal by hitting the stocks of the internet, through such a mysticism a phantasm of romantic manifestions are these done. Not wholistically though, not systemically, that's thats a danger.

Cannot manifest a chance in that lottery.

Carneades was going with a foundherntist view of epistemology. Crossewordism along with a web, with contradictions assimilating then assorting.
Science does the specification, yet art does not follow that. Creativity does not follow that.

All in the design of our own determinations and creative springs.

reductionism/holism

 Finally, a word that's opposite of reductions. By Julian Baggini who's been reading contemporary philosophy, well, some would call this pop philosophy, at least I had to get it.

Reductionism served its manner with the attempt of the sciences, and economical means, this verification does not translate to the art and aesthetics.

Realism maths contingent on money, right? Everything down to profit, right? It's not so simple.

Holism (Even associated with odd practices, this is outside of it. Complementary medicine, mysticism) It is the combined efforts of strategic systems that Aristotle, the macro-level of the taxonomy, such is the view.

Why is it the matter of the internet thinking that entertainment and advertisement, of the reductionism model being all there is, that the TL;DR. Concision and cogency for the sake of it.

So, the copywriter and industrialist are distinct, mistaking the parts from the whole.

Novels keep novelising

 A scenes au faire, bread and butter of a writer's arsenal. From beat to the end of play.

I dive in the self-publishing literary style

Structuralisations of scenes keep multiplying. This one weaves of a plan with etymologies and then into the narratologies with digression of strands and strings to boot.

Waves, cell-like, little ripples, meanders, spiral and explode, the world and historiography of our scene creativity is vast, with various risks to the status quo ante.

Such is our words defined by ideological, abstract foundherentisms. Our wisdoms and knowledge not set within a rigid framework of our history is to be expanded on our inexhaustible resources of our mind.

Here's to other patterns 🛋☕

Bricolage

 Improvised assemblies, such improvised straight ahead animating that is made as opposed with post-to-post.

That's another word I learned today, that it can stick or not.

What a word where the matter of our words are made to the public rhetoric, will this one stick? Including eudemonic, Bildungsroman, genre, horizon of expectations, complex, conception, edge, gothic, materialism, ideology, and empowerment/vulnerability.

Such as our words and the axiology we assign in our conversational praxis, going forward.

That's literature, though, finding beauty in words.

Mmm, words.

Even eidetic memory is a manner of brain stuff.

Inertia Character apologies Trist

What am i to do with you?

You were an impulse that's managed to come intuit, with me being my first characters before Couch George.

Now I cannot assemble my cast to make scenes, not illustrative beats it's where you lefts, of sexualised thinness, now I'm not looking at you as my inertia of my words and work will not be able to move you, or pick you like a means of display with words.

A skater that was failing, you were going to be part of the previous scenes where you were a gym goer who never gains muscle. Then you'd be free.

Yet, time and experience are cruel mistress.

Oh I don't know.

Maybe another cartoonist can do you justice, selling you off can be too stressful, though. I barely have enough conversion rate as it is, maybe I don't have that ruthlessness and showmanship available.

Not like the SEO circus of waves have much interest with me anyway.

Thanks for the benefit

Oneirataxia / Hyperreality

Metamodernism time! The literary kind, not the self-defeating financial kind.

 Fantasy and reality. Non-reflective of the person creating such a fetish, yet the time, it comes out.

Within our own realms of design where our own perception, we are entering a realm where art is hostile to entertaining the perceived, yet through the repulsion becomes the paradoxical attraction, for attraction cannot be the positive value being made, so right today, that's with the negative, with its scepticism brings an compulsion.

36 essay on a self-referential movie. Funny Games. Which is an attempt to bring opposition of meaning into the mix of our own perceptions, along with ending within a pretentious ending that cannot be called slop. Anybody who's read scriptwriting 101 will be getting the cues right now of who's being signalled, with this being the in-joke.

We are stuck within our own entertainment. On how YouTube and xwitter being on the downside of ad money and not subscription services.

Slippery slopes, or not.

Irony and sincerity, such a distinction. Irony poisoned is sincerity masquerading as irony.

Fictional Savior Complex

Documentaries and non-fiction has become fiction, demarcation becoming blurry, that's a problem with no stated genre bending, shifting and braiding. All a happening of conflating entertainment with the more serious pursuits.

Is it me, yet the "It's more complicated than that, art is supposed to save us?" Or is organised direct action suppose to be made?

That's an anarchist response.

I can't go to direct action due to my disability, so I teach and editorialise instead. Being an honest hack within entertainment, because like Harlen said, the show must go on.

What with the paradox of fiction, subsists within our culture, still persists. Art aren't fully joined by the hip of entertainment product, yet when they do.

on matt and trays "therefore and buts"

Despite being tiring, wrong satirists, there is only one thing I like, at a craftmanship of archplotal/miniplotal storytelling. Their body has plenty of wrong takes, and videoagames covers that. 3 hours of all its crude position, (crude is an understatement, You may even disagree with certain points, I'm tackling them as narrative energy. )

They are beings affected at a time with first responders, It's going to be a case by case that I can't summarise with a synopsis.

They know how to add progressive complications, making stuff compelling. Within fiction, the bedrock of compulsion.

How do you lead in towards a fascination complication that's rising (Shōnen) or Decline? (Horror) You compel with contradictions from the ordinary path! Good job teaching others how to dramatise that so many have done, there or other contradictory words (Don't, a hint.)

Well, Dramatisation is something any dramatist and playwright can teach. Merely another moment for a complicated, libertarian character, with many of the essayist doing a lot.

Man disagreements and agreements, Thanks for using contrast conjunctions. Don't they share all the conflicts that entertainers have, ah.

External/Internal motivators

Internal could be self-actualization. The pursuit of self-determination theory, or that of the principle. 

External is exposure/monetization. Could be measured, could be validation. Or the schedule and mise en place of what to do.

Structuralisation means that it's both, interconnect synetically within a stream of continuous time of interweaving of flows.

So now, with self-determination theory, which of these motivators are doing a disservice?

Even with non-self, it's the theories we make of our conceptual minds of our bodys and brains that are another story of our humanity.

Crosswordism of epistemology: Susan Haack

Notes! 

Crosswordism, a conciliatory epistemological framework of viewing the world for out philosophy, of complete true justified belief. Yet here we are, some of here essays are good, some of them are not. Regarding Neurlanaysis and the overwriting of very within the language.

I gravitate towards Stephan Jay Gould and the mismeasure of man, along with Delusions of Gender as authority sources of Cordelia fine in regard to that. (I'll have to reread it.)

I wanna leave phrenology to the academics, I'm an artist/entertainer first.

Nobody's perfect with my wabi-sabism, So I take a bit from there, a bit from that. Now, such a visualisation of 3-dimensional epistemology is a way of reasons and clues being evidentiary experiences. Wow, she does like paradoxes, as do I within my fiction.

Well, that's ambiguity, that's a way to approach an essay or a fictional work.

Later she critiques the further industrialisation with academia and that's reflected or the orderisation and packaging of student into products that's a simple way with SAT tests, that later is the golden lining that brings with topics. Ad agencies lines of thinking that Seth Godin that has thought, or that he has to seek.

Attorneys being representation of advocacy rather than scientist being that of the pursuit of knowledge. Along with other distinctions, if you ignore thing, she provides a good framework for paradoxes and a 3-dimensional way of seeing discourse.

Trippy, man. Things for the philosophy are to be questioned, nothing is safe, from copyright and curious questions, a lot of questions, and then there's answers.

I'd recommend despite the odd bits.

The success of the esteem contract

Abstract expressionism, again. Got this term from Oxford Academia, I'm a smarty little couch. 👓🛋

Literature illuminate new concepts for what it's like. The success of the esteem where it's a success despite institutional rejection critical literary success, and then, there's the-

The success de scandal where is today's sonic the hedgehog. How history repeats itself, is that shock value or somewhere discovery lies. Even when advertising can rationalise its opportunism with any guardrails, there's always an entire expose industry complex waiting to slurp it up. Well, such is the public exictement and then notoriety/infamy. Race to the bottom?

Then there's the esteem, The naïveté of such a Success of de esteem, especially with the permission of the big publishers and studios.

Which as Independents, we don't need such a permission.

What a romantic fantasy of being picked up by the commercial publisher and getting adapted! What a dream! What a fantasy? What a naïveté. Well, maybe they'll move onto naiveism with that, I don't know what will happen to it and everything can be made into inspiration porn. That's what preposterism happens to be with its ad creep.

All stuck within the Discovery Channel of our own perceived dreams circulating. Regardless of these goals, it could be meant to be literary or commercial success, things change.

Fickle'n Fleeting, Deshowmantize

Stuff writing has taught, that audiences that chase the latest mass market trend are not going to step off the carousal. Writing with the limited showmanship of literature can be a humbling experience, some say it's harder to write a game than it is to program it.

All part of the process rather than the results that appear fresh of the social media, which everything is not sacred there from the vulgarisations of the internet. The amount it takes to verbalise thoughts with sucking others with jingling keys respects other literacy, which I hope to increase and illuminate, not level up. Yet shine a light.

A bit of an enlightenment and not a metric based metric, I know, we are talking soft skills here, stuff that's hard to measure. Where ideas and the enrolment matter and conceptual abstraction helps make this a testing ground.

Not like going viral and monetizing was an option today, despite other companies capitalizing off it. Well, you give what you take with those under the .com things.

Even copywriters, and certain commercial novelists, how do you deal with mass ignorance? Nobody want's to read with attention and time commoditized into content, and at this point. It's merely our keyboards verbalising our thoughts.

centaur and reverse centaur

Cory Doctorow has sparked this one.

Are we leading the machines with creativity/novelisation, or are we leading to the background noise of being led by the hackneyed machinations? That's what it is, hackneyed service for service sakes machinations. 

Machinations serving, or are we serving them? Needs or profit.

Creatives and craftsman will need to confront this as dirative intelligence continues to normalise. Some will embraces, others will leave.

No interiority to be seen here! AI hollowness

Thinking of the Cory Doctorows post on AI art

 Guilty for being promiscuous or hypersexual, well that's the norm. Then it becomes the formula of service.

The biological, note the physiological or sociological, of ireducable complexity. Such was the essentialising that failed from Auguste Comte, and the scientific management failure due to hustle culture, the attraction principle was the failure of positivism of physio-semantic controls of all this direct responses to hustle hustle hustle.

Then it's this moment of using programmers to solve all the economic problems, it's obvious that the end.

I'm going to have a take on capitalism, monopoly, and all that jazz, urgh. At least it's on a blog.

(Yeah, I now lapse and accidental instances can make it into a work of art too. Avile has demonstrated. )

Structuration of scenes

This is a doodle pad now, something that a traditional artist will do to prepare his lines.

 Sociology has advanced, huh?

So, according to the story grid. One of the skills to write must have is writing not beats, something that an illustrator or actor must focus, but scenes. Yes, scene obsession from the Mise en place to Mise en scène. 

Scene scenes, that's the work that's building into sequences that completes a sentence, that completes an act, that complete a play, that completes a piece of entertainment/art piece.

From the objective view of a copywriter to the subjective view of a memoirist, why not both? Paradoxes merge into new concepts.

1:38 hour video, had some disagreements with the saphir wharf hypothesis and other theorys, source, though. Sociology will compliment the fictional ways of the novelist.

Our actions define our standards then back again, it's a circle way and since there freelancers have no higher authority or status to guide them, it's up to them and there responsabilitys.

Why I am a literary editor, not a commercial one.

 Since commercial speaks for itself, I aim for the long-risky term and along more complexity of an established foundherentism principle. Figuratively in it's totaly.

That's what literature and by definition is, most of the ludo logical tautology online simple is not. Literacy requires pretension to be comprehended from audience to author. Where hypocrisy with all the affecting that since entertainment writing is meant. Entertainment writing ain't as pretentious as academy, editorial, journalism, and politics.

Yet such a distinction is worth talking and reminding once and again. That's for the foolish fiction to be the philosophical fact, to editorialise and to fictionalise once again.

https://substack.com/@ayanartan/note/p-153820574

Since the net, everybody can copyright now (Including this link towards pretension! Wow) Yet with everything with hyper-measurement, it ain't that scruncabley simple.

Archtypes;Ectype

 Typology of an unmeasured concept is leading into a most Jungian framework.

That's how we categorize, from the archetypes to the stereotypes are fictitious imaginations. Compared to reality from our mental states could do un-shipped.

Unshipped imaginations that can't come out, such of our impressions that lead us into literature and then the configuration into a new being. Arch as in all, arc that could be done for non-symbolic characters, then those who remain, become an ever embodiment of the typological constant.

How are these mental parts of self, non-dualistically, lead us.

Patterns that bind us

If I had to nominate the worst doodle, this is it. Since I'm the editor though, I shall let it pass.

Yep, that's another problem, Edify for those who aren't ready to be leaded, for the those who are literate. To serve the sexual formalism of a system of the next entertainment mascot that merely happens to bring the next thing, structuration in the McDonald's iron cage.

Are they going to listen, or is the formula? The formulation pays when this nature of our hackneyed pigeonholing is done for a reason. From our taxonomies and typologies. Of our genre, to confirm to fit.

Almost like, something when commitment is applied.

Informal, not illiterate. Copywrighting Translation

 There's certain rules copywriters can laterally apply to their own writing, other times there are not.

Mass communications of action towards a specific work of art, Or communicating academic concepts of specificity, gatekeeping within those fields do matter though.

Another means of understanding a copywriting technique is the informally to make sure one performs as intended from the sceptic, yet to not skip out of the illiteracy.

From General and specific, if one hopes to publish oneself, that copywriting towards a target someone is something to consider with all the ideas that are floating around. Crafting towards the centre of that, becoming informal to the point of connect, not to invite antagonism.

That's the interaction with the public.

Proud of pretension, Tension to compel.

What is the point, going ahead, being a leader. Where things don't end to work. Where all the things lead into the land of where it's all community this or community that.

The start of a community, though, is one where Community's of practice that lead into fresh ideas. With every idea of status leading into a new pretension. From one moment of which to lead into the moment.

From the flat moments, everything where there is no conflict, there is no propulsion of our ideas into a new direction.

What a spark, what an incitement, what a pull.

Not obsessive compulsive disorder.