You can lead a horse to water

You can't make it to drink.

Such is coercion and undermining the intrinsic justness of communication, of external and internal alignment.

(Let's not phreno again, oop.)

Status conventions, of informal organisation of it all, of the mental relationalism of our phenomena. That, along such indication that his hyper-measured within the direct response of social media.

That genre, that expectation can never be read, with the externalised craft there and out.

That's all the temptation of promotion or social status, from the lump
of leap of what one ought to do with it, once it's out in the wild.

All in the realizations others have self-governance, and all its troubles.

A deliberate, non-serious response : Conservative art essay, and my aesthetic direction

(Is this complimentary doodle, Idk)

 This one, one with the funded kickstarter, apparently. I'll keep it low profile, I've already dived in to anti-positions such as porn, and now it's a conservative one (Intelligent at least.)

Made a good argument for consciousness.

• Hays code realism is on point. Best part.
  
  
  (They're still posts about this)
• Transgressive realism and dysthrophic realism are both confused, maybe he's being cynical with how everthing ia co-opted by reactionary capital? Doug Ruskoff the Merchants of cool documentary covered this phenomenon with mtv, test audiences and mtv. This is merely central institutions trying to resonate, you still have your romantic realism on a indie level.
• Is he nostaliging of the home of Classical realism

More of the American Jingo realism of GURNS.

• Who claims the aesthetic of this category of romantic realism? I'm more a gothic in the aesthetic realm, yet here's to a category exclusive to partisanship. Decide their entitlement to dictate women's bodies, its always weird, they are reminded they are not in control. Self-flagellation, and simply not that note-worthy, considering the Stellers blade and other designs not convening to that nuclear family expectation.

(That lara croft is unflattering comparison btw)

Pretty commissions and at least superhero stuff happening, I can see.

Peter Coffin went that these continuing qualia of interpretation of ideas, With these commodified into conventions of the trad-wife/stepford wive type of deal, at least that former Randian is trying his best to crawl by refuting romantic realism, I never had to entertain it.
How are labour is made to follow along the conditions of rule, into a commodified community to then circulate new aesthetics like this one.

Now for my own which I'll coin in aesthetical tastes. Here's my own taste.

Foundherent Realism or Gothic
Crosswordism

A combination of pragma and dogma, to bring forwards a manner which drive dialectical realism which is to pursuit of knowledge (Epistme) and the holism of the techne of art in its edges of mysticism. There are the ways that is can bring with a physical foundation, and the emergent culture of our arts, aligning with our conventions of hacksmanship, entertaining illusions of spectacle. Both dancing concepts. It can both handle abstraction and representation.

or so, with the industry of it's essence (The show must go on) Of Life's fulfilment and it's deaths decay. Embracing both of dialectic of structure and superstructure to help build a knowledge and culture worth fighting for. Or so that's strength, ( Provided with a Eric Helms autoregulation physical programming of the body.)

So what am I to do with the entertainment enterprise? Critique it? Endorse it? Well, You'll get it.

Shall the area of our immaterial reflect the materials anew, and bring a shine of new pragma and dogma. I wish it well. As originate from a classical past and reunify it from it's iconoclastic trappings. (That's from Schott Mclout

From the sublimely mawkish, compared to it's abject horrors. For they bring into our own urban fantasy they reflect our areas.

Ufiction to unfiction. Copyright horror story

Well, From this story of derative. Of ufiction, uncomfortable fiction. Is a good story on if copyright trolls had there way.

I'll keep tabs there still creatives at the edge, having opinions and are not gig workers, trying to make it, even with the pull of perverse incentives.

We need to drop the pretence that copyright censors
hip could end the Ai phenomena. Plus it could infringe on my right to depict Bowser within satire with proprietary DRM. This is universal enforcement, not selective like copyright trolls do. My fan art is textbook copyright infringement. The onus is on the firm nintendo to send a DMCA takedown if I commercialize it.

Based on Kant's categorical imperative of internal freedom. Treating each other through consciousness rather than objectifying.

The inputs and outputs don't match, technically so it's nebulous. Plus, Copyright is anti-worker with the labor protection. It's for distributors/publishers, not creative labor.

Thankfully due the infinite shelf space of the internet distribution, micro-distribution it will niche out even if it could try (It's not like it's Super Bowl mass advertising, where one will have to buy/ask advertising/celebrity endorsements to get traffic. )

All that indominable logic of expanding content id and conception of ownership (Do they understand that? The idea/expression dichotomy exists.)

Walk away from this one. 

The land of no boundaries of business guru maxims

 This vision were all the matter. 

With mass advertiser. Goes into the hustle trance.

The way of the machine zone of playing an eternal economy game of physical pleasure/pain, all the complexities between. With the emotional ways and emotional states, compared to the physical states.

Then I'm trying to clamber for an extension, then I'm not, getting substack posts via business gurus, are well, people who happen to keep working, it's all the advice of people who keep workings

How is the motivation doing, self-industry complex? Any benefit? You don't have to follow any of this advice if you don't have a problem. They are nebulously reaching for better within the void of extrajudicial lands.

Thanks, I guess, then there's that phrase in snarl quotes.

Personal brand, not caring about strangers. Guess that's the confirmation a publisher does using the legal fiction. With what a publisher does after all the labour is all collected, his personal value judgement is there.

I can't blame that kind of mindset, if he's running an independent, giving free advice if it does not work or not.

At least you're not selling anything, bud! Well, bought into this.
Took your test on your blog.

Such entertainment 🛋️💭

There you go, into the sunk cost of getting a book deal (or not) I know you're trying to help. With words of authenticity cropping up again (Illusionist entertainers aren't), then it's the reason this will go.

Where will you stop with the how-to roulette? Reverse engineer.

Well, continue on with your generalities.

(You could consider pablum, what do you think?)

This one's fascinating though, creator economy he's coined? Idk, this may be what publishers give a sunk cost to creatives (Petit boug) Who happen to build their labour of signals of distribution.

Have some more, Philosophy wannabe. Signalling is talking about semiotics? I'm still reading that Umberto eco book with all the academic reading.

He's a slow-down kind of man, I'm a stay-in-sync-with-yourself-man

Solving problems? I like to give my characters problems.

Well good sir, good going on a sunk cost. 🛋️👍 Like I am.

"Stay Sovereign" Was the email.

Getting under someone's skin

Rage bait, Oxford noted This is the word that of those who use

Well, even with the direct response tickers here. Even as the liberal Seth goes on, (Why do I still follow? Well, it's on trolling, and those who try to crawl and squirm under your skin.

Yet this engagement is what it is, teleological presumption reveals parts of the character. From the accuser rather than the accused. That's Friedrich Nietziech for you. That perspectivism, (Some conservatives share that aswell.)

Come one, and come all.

Fox Key
" It's so weird how the people who most claim to hate social media, technology and modernity are the most unable to leave it. At some point that's just a failure of character. Like, fine, everyone needs a phone to get around and email people or use Slack or Teams or whatever. But did you know that most normies don't use Twitter? It's true. Most normies are already better than you! "I'm too addicted and Twitter is making me post every day about how much I hate Twitter!", brother, most people do perfectly fine without scrolling on social media 200 times a day. "I'm posting to warn others and do praxis", actually, you're posting because you're addicted to praise and the follow number going up has created a psychological dependence. And it's fine, but if you hate it so much it's a failure not to leave it. "

if you pontificate about attention

One may getting pretentious, and unlikable.

Lack of self-awareness or no anatta of non-self of being a hack/proffesional.

So, All this meta-recursion is all the moment of monetisation hits I dip out.

It's the most naked new-mania. 

So it begins again, and to the meta, people making money by teaching others to make money online, with the business models having to be unique alongside and tethered to the under structure of the digital landscape.

Unless if it's about advertising, by Seth Godin, Or Tim Wu's the merchants of attention. Or even Mathhew Bartholomew's Ad-creep. Can only take so much pretention in a day.

Inimical to the fictional true justified belief, along with fictional Legalese, so handle with care.

Propaganda is education/from our attention merchants of sex.

 Wow, Formalised instruction one keeps personal, yet unless it's entertainment under the legalese of fiction, there's a more direct approach.

Welp, Since essays are propaganda much like school, here's one on education within the west.

Sex workers (Prostitution) as I agree with most of what this video is on about. Thanks for the public service, and even if the opinions don't align, I know I can endorse the views like this.

Is this what they mean by world W***** three with what Chuck Palunuik wrote with pornagraphers? Like me being on the lower run of the whorearchy with its on social dynamics at play of all the way people seem to not pay attention to this blog, consumer my porn then go about their business? With that legeles of no politics, wanting only entertainment?

Is that it?

Well, rhetorically of course, there's the way I have to address sexcess of those who are discreet about what they enjoy, with their kinks that I have to address, it's like this wild west that I'm going to live in will have to see how others are paying attention.

It's like those kink accounts that post only porn to a marketing efficiency standpoint, yet I'm not optimised, I can't fit in a mold, being an intellectual with many foundherent believes ain't out of his Cascoon yet of discovering that I'm a freak who like with my Marxism.

Oh well, you follow doctrines, your article, and you're done.

W*****-Archy

Sexcess

Sexcess, that people only value me for my sexual performance. (If you ab-test a website enough, it will turn into a porn site.)

There, uncensored the word porn now, I'm done.

I'll keep track of Intellectexual, she may have some ignorant assumptions regarding with how deep I am in the beep boops, yet it will all pass.

speed format conclusions

Badmouse said that streamers earning fame ( or infamy symbolic relatable capital ) and money hinders the overall struggle.

I say, yeah as an activist, no as an entertainer. Yet, do these editorials say otherwise, ho ho ho, well, you do encourage me Harlen.

Staying in sync is the most important of all these.

Since streaming is the best take to be able to manage ones one personal space, there's no editing, one clear distinction between editing (non-sync) and unediting (sync).

Leaving a trail, editing along the genealogy of ideas to pluck out moments of consciousness. That is one sense, to bring verisimilitude with the work.

Fuzzy mirage of mental models/literacy/illiteracy

Happy Halloween! Here's a off-the-cuff essay by a philosophy student wanting literacy.

Yet I know I'll have to deal with mass communicating towards an illiterate audience outside.

What convinced me was Neil postman. Even with my Art Director brain that I have to learn at literacy, I haven't had to chance to read all the socialism books so that's why some of my feed are videos, so even if I'm not literate, I'm aware of the changing concepts closely rela

Otherwise, you get Vaush, missed that train, or Ed Zitron.

I call this new strain the prosumer leftism, which is absorbed within itself of its own social media bubble. Or wilfully misinformed leftism.

Yet with the right/left graph and the political compass, I'm going to have to do another post on that.

Hypocritical Stream of consciousness is the point. Inconsistent bibliography.

(Wip for environmental sketch for HPComic)

So, I haven't read James Joyce yet, guess I'm not a savant.

Yet this stream of consciousness where i entertain thoughts without committing to them fully is point, if they get offended or not, outside my purview, like how did can be responsible for that?

Is disclosing a bibliography a rant? Not that i know off, well, it could be a that i disclosed and overshared. Well, the bibliography is the part where one should overshare. Those are all the sources.

Authors can be authors without becoming authoritative on this, under there own volition of responsibility to do what they want and not intrude into others self-defence function for each other, co-exist.

They can be direct with me if my indirect bibliography in this blog.

🛋⭐

Here it is. Minus the sex joke.

"Heya, bibliography thoughts on Ai. (Hopefully I don't get blown up by a butlerian jihad like in dune ) It's not that simple. So it's why I'm showing it. @sunnmcheaux and @Austinmconnell has done reasonable takes, Flazfire has done a video on Twitter Artists and how annoying they are, yet I think he's wrong on plagiarism and environment. That's youtube. Alexander Avile is the top banger though. As for environment, the accurate take was by Andy Masley on substack, I'm being anti-doomer on this while taking a more preperationist stance like Neil Postman. Reading his Technomoply and Amusing ourselves to death.

It even intersects with Media Theory, Tim Wu Attention merchants, Matthew Bartholmew Adcreep, Seth Godin This is Marketing, (He has done a course on AI) Doug Ruskoff The Merchants of Cool and the Generation Like Documentary. Even Harlen Ellison The Glass Teat and the Second Glass Teat editorials on the television industry complex. Herschel Gordon Lewis books on copywriting. Woo! Foundherentism of evidence matters is why all these theories intersect like a crossword, By Susan Haack. Moral theory to Deontology and Utilitarianism somewhere in the background. Thank you! Phew 🛋️💨 Feel free to ask questions."

Yet, I know with this prosumer culture, do they care? Am I showing off? Or is it the part that is required? Well, it matters to those who read, no point to those who are illiterate, or the post illiterate now.

Can't lapse into consistency for consistency’s sake. Or simplicity for simplicity due to me not being able to face the Curse of knowledge with these simplified platforms of micro-blogging memes and gag shorts.

Those platforms are designed for those who don't read, and don't have a bibliography there, I will have there. It will remind me of the curse of knowledge which will permit me for another post.

Legal terms I've come to terms with.

(Enough gags and the clown suit Back the the lawsuits with Couch Gregor unmasking his deontology.

Thanks, Wikipedia. Well, with a legal perspective aligning one thing at a time. I'm not a lawyer, as the first Sturgeons law. Deciphering the legalese and making sense that's not twitterian. Twitterian embarrassment interpretations shall not cease here.

Serious law lecture, from Immanuel Kant and philosophy, they shall be made.

Sturgeons Law

90-10 of everything his crud, the law of mediocrity. Mediocracy! Well, this is the Law of Slop. The law of Kitsch. Where monopoloys of random monopolys appear, and then the publishers scoop them up, then it all happens again. How do they intersect with the economy, and with choke points.

Habeus Corpus

You may keep the body or so that others can't be compulsively aggressive with crimes of wild passion. Clowns running into the bank with anonymity and death threats with harassment are all a wild passion.

Erga Omnes

The deontological where it applies internally to logically make sense, in order for the conception of consciousness to exist. (Pretty deep and philosophical, I know, abstract stuff about the mind and the phycology I learned as an atheist. )

Internal, ideological consistent, that's duty and deduction for ya.

Deontology adjustments to content ID, learning/access rights. Those don't meat with Kantian second categorial imperative, to be treated like an end rather than a means, with consciousness not accounted for. It's foundherent to law theory.

Cui bono?

Who benefits? Well, finances may not matter in terms of the appeal to motive. Which is a informal fallacy, (Reasons need to be provided for it to foundherently matter)

Appeal to motive where two lawyers and their pay cheques enter within a case does not account for the validity of the case.

Appeal to motive with a grifter like Mike Hearn selling the fitness frog/ab wheel is another matter, though.

De Minimus

Got this from Cory Doctorow's copyright cases ( Although I don't think averages are technically correct) another, Nobody want's to read your *S---* within law. The eagle does not concern itself with flies. Pertaining with minimal things, systemically with the environment. As it contains to structure of the large pictures, which extends to the metaphysics of property and of energy redistribution.

Illteracy bad?

 I must admit, I'm illiterate in certain topics, along with certain professions.

That's okay, admittance is alright. Since the tower of babel is itself with all the meanings, can show that it's all a matter of infinite meaning and infinite decoding of all things can't happen.

Suppose with all the knowledge, something will allow one to increase their direct response, conversion rates and external incentives.

Nope!

There it goes, another wave of news and synchronicity of the culture. There is all goes again, like a train. We all have illiteracy within us, it's another hedonic treadmill.

Do the reading, yes, yet don't hold back. Have editorials, opinions and themes and see what works.

Types of societal/aesthetic edge

This video made me think of types to either split hairs or think of changing definitions.

Nioce entertainment editorial on the emoification of the media as political science influenced our society and entertainment reflected that, especially with that game with the hedgehog and the gun.

1. Edgy 
   Definition: Edgy emo is an exploration of themes of darkness and angst.
   
   I don't mind prescriptive and cautionary tales, dark art has always a been as much as horror has been around, edger allan poe's poetry, such as comes from the sprouts of gothic literature has been into our art and entertainment.
   
2. Anne D. Bernstein (Rest in peace) Could be possibly written this a point of Dariah's characterisation, yet this is all the matter of coolhunting shown through the documentary the merchants of cool by Doug Ruskoff Welcome to the machine.
   
   Marketing being neutral as with propaganda of ideological and material justifications, all that pillow. Well, as thinking marketised within sociopolitical contexts.
   
   
3. Another is when creativity and art, where meeting any criteria of measure ain't the point, or so the specifcation.
4. Another is race to the bottom and profit incentive* I forgot that.

Love/Terror

Anekantavad Was pondering on dichotomy as an opposite of love, despite the one stated by The Story Grid Is Hate.

With this centred of axiology, though, then it's with Terror.

Nothingness, the stark unknown. With the depths, of our animals, to the natural state of being, that's made with the stark eyes that stare back. Both unnatural and natural totality of states circling and showing with all the feelings combined.

To our labour that's made with measured or not, Intrinsic and reaching to a definition of self and the exter
nal frameworks and structurations.

Then is all vanishes.

Poof!

Falling.

Falling..

Manichaean/Also my family's mosaic

 Black&white Good&Evil

(Two murals part of workshops I do.)

All of this and all of that simple and clear dichotomy.

(Anders Brevick of lone wolf)

Ah, the times I was an existentially hanging on 14 years ago, back when I atheism was a matter of talks and video logs of philosophical pondering were a thing, this may not be completely true.

What an artefact, it was the seeds of what was the 2016, then it was a next time.

People bring and try to litigate victims, arbitrarily, non-sequitor. Hard determination still lingering, some people can't be helped.

It's why I'm not a gamer.

People are self-reflecting, people are moving on. I'm moving on, Good.

(Adultism aside, that moment an echo now.)

There's still people stuck there.

incertophobia/incertophilia

Oh certainty, does not exist within this editors-free digital age.

Those who love it as with there are degrees and then there's probability,

From the Georges Moore the open question (Which has been critiqued from various schools of thoughts) Yet I do believe in the process of Quine's irrational sciences

Such as publishers try to find a magic wand to manifest hits or that somehow that it's suppose to manifest an instant influencer deal by hitting the stocks of the internet, through such a mysticism a phantasm of romantic manifestions are these done. Not wholistically though, not systemically, that's thats a danger.

Cannot manifest a chance in that lottery.

Carneades was going with a foundherntist view of epistemology. Crossewordism along with a web, with contradictions assimilating then assorting.
Science does the specification, yet art does not follow that. Creativity does not follow that.

All in the design of our own determinations and creative springs.

reductionism/holism

 Finally, a word that's opposite of reductions. By Julian Baggini who's been reading contemporary philosophy, well, some would call this pop philosophy, at least I had to get it.

Reductionism served its manner with the attempt of the sciences, and economical means, this verification does not translate to the art and aesthetics.

Realism maths contingent on money, right? Everything down to profit, right? It's not so simple.

Holism (Even associated with odd practices, this is outside of it. Complementary medicine, mysticism) It is the combined efforts of strategic systems that Aristotle, the macro-level of the taxonomy, such is the view.

Why is it the matter of the internet thinking that entertainment and advertisement, of the reductionism model being all there is, that the TL;DR. Concision and cogency for the sake of it.

So, the copywriter and industrialist are distinct, mistaking the parts from the whole.

Novels keep novelising

 A scenes au faire, bread and butter of a writer's arsenal. From beat to the end of play.

I dive in the self-publishing literary style

Structuralisations of scenes keep multiplying. This one weaves of a plan with etymologies and then into the narratologies with digression of strands and strings to boot.

Waves, cell-like, little ripples, meanders, spiral and explode, the world and historiography of our scene creativity is vast, with various risks to the status quo ante.

Such is our words defined by ideological, abstract foundherentisms. Our wisdoms and knowledge not set within a rigid framework of our history is to be expanded on our inexhaustible resources of our mind.

Here's to other patterns 🛋☕

Bricolage

 Improvised assemblies, such improvised straight ahead animating that is made as opposed with post-to-post.

That's another word I learned today, that it can stick or not.

What a word where the matter of our words are made to the public rhetoric, will this one stick? Including eudemonic, Bildungsroman, genre, horizon of expectations, complex, conception, edge, gothic, materialism, ideology, and empowerment/vulnerability.

Such as our words and the axiology we assign in our conversational praxis, going forward.

That's literature, though, finding beauty in words.

Mmm, words.

Even eidetic memory is a manner of brain stuff.

Inertia Character apologies Trist

What am i to do with you?

You were an impulse that's managed to come intuit, with me being my first characters before Couch George.

Now I cannot assemble my cast to make scenes, not illustrative beats it's where you lefts, of sexualised thinness, now I'm not looking at you as my inertia of my words and work will not be able to move you, or pick you like a means of display with words.

A skater that was failing, you were going to be part of the previous scenes where you were a gym goer who never gains muscle. Then you'd be free.

Yet, time and experience are cruel mistress.

Oh I don't know.

Maybe another cartoonist can do you justice, selling you off can be too stressful, though. I barely have enough conversion rate as it is, maybe I don't have that ruthlessness and showmanship available.

Not like the SEO circus of waves have much interest with me anyway.

Thanks for the benefit