The question of the first impression, all crystallised into a fine amount of constellations of dreams and symbols made into certain impulses and intuition. Connecting into a social purpose given.
Weaving in and out, it's discursive circles that are meant to serve an honest hack's work. Deliberate within the intention. The distinction of between professional/hack could be and entirely non-realistic. Commercialism is brute. Being a hack for the right reasons, oh ho ho Tautologies are unfortunately unpersuasive for deals too!
Let's leave the business/economic questions, divining into one of the things that fuel under creativity. So many other than monetisation.
It's one of the things that ain't epitomised by.
One of the tasks of the freelancer to connect with unsympathetic users.
As with my dabbling with languages, terms come, expressions neologised as concepts crystallise, reflecting "in terminology" of yesteryears. Moving on with Heteroglossia.
Weaving the linguistics, from Arch-genre, to Sub-genre, to various stages, to the formation of our meanings and back again, it's a literary marvel to behold.
With that of the meta-in-of-itself that can defy any generality and specificity. Such a means of commercial editing shows that show which to either capitalise on attention and their hold.
What concepts, what ideas, what stuff no copywriter can uphold. Yet, with me and others being the enlightened within discursive circles. This is why the literary entertainment could be the highest form, which will always be better. Nothing is that memorable from that quick-shot place of dopamine culture.
Sure, whether these concepts will funnel towards are fictional entertainment, retaining into concepts of our culture is another matter. It's certainly been a fine, literary dive.
Such terms of sociological understanding, Even though the concept of the horizon of expectations will be needing its out post of understanding. Despite it sounding like a final fantasy villain.
What if the systems and normalisations does not work, though?
Forever in the feed-back loop that S*** G**** done to me, (If you reacted and think of him too Sigma Grindsetty, I wouldn't blame you.)
Prosumer feedback loops giving reassurance for more direct response.
Habits and reassurances, what is normalised, does it matter?
One when things and matters after auto-regulation, then do these standards are made to be normalised. It's a better to see ones that are made into breathing into the culture, and those worth curating out. Even to the point of anti-convention to become a dependence, and the formula's to be examined for the forms.
When it comes to chasing tails, there a means that are seen as utility.
Utility seen for the sake of it. Chased with the easily measure money source.
What a land into the defeatism, it's always the short-term. At least for the others, such the noting of SEO fads and the fluctuations between, there's always a way to be patient and follow the long-line.
That's not for the others chasing the short-term business.
Build a business model on a stack of cards, it's what you get.
Negativity. It's the reaction that puts the mail into the junk-bin. This is where none of the benefit of the doubt rests. From welcome messages, to spam.
Negative reactions have coupled with the age of scepticism to the symbolism of hope.
It happens, first thing to ask, this is the intended prospect and is it worth prospecting? Next, there could be a million reasons for the denial, it ain't a denial of you, are they points of cynicism from their obsession of business. With the detection of a rote scrip of all the rote mechanisms occur.
Only then, to the unwritten realm where the continuing interaction with the audience will happen. With the beholder's share.
From first impression, what are the first thoughts?
Now this is where the benefit of the doubt lies, It's time for my take.
Wherein lies what may be called, making a mark, or customer service. To the way of pushing in towards the culture, To think of potentiality of possibility as the reverse. It's where the first impression lies to see where the point of practical empathy lies, to point a to point B.
It's the moment of identity of consciousness, of where this interruption is worth the users time and interest, if it's true justified knowledge, that's wisdom to 'spend' some time and attention, not as a prospect, potential thing to communicate.
When it comes the first-impression, thinking outside in from the non-self and to the user in question. Inside in. What is the first impression that will lead them?
Do you remember the impressions you've done on the first page, any memorable and remarkable experiences? The skimming passive experience comes first, then with the stop-of-tracks sensation.
Then:
Tourist:
Spammer, Hustlers, Hate raiders, y'know. Where the validation of the response/reaction, with the bots of no lived-in mission. That's the means of what, they are plenty of moderation tools to show the rule-of-law and such with that benefit.
There's one thing unifying them, though, they are tourists and not there to interact in good faith. Prosumers with the cycle they are, with rubberneckers.
Neophiliacs:
Woosh, they are the interactions, and it's certainly a random sensation with the stream. These will be conversations, and the way it should. These are the first mark of the funnel, and it might last, or might not.
Customer service and the means to create the benefit of the doubt, with the means to be favourable within the newcomer's eyes. Is to not hustle, yet serve.
With this collection, the conversion could occur, you'd never know! If not, You've shown a decent impression of the authorial self.
Could be a passive, encouragement fan towards a more active one.
Rest in peace Danial Dennet, discovered his death.
Sellars said "The aim of philosophy is formulated, is to understand how things in the broadest sense of the term hang together in the broadest sense of the term "
Wow, this books dances with physics and risks becoming a deepity when going against a deepity. I love it, this slither of a point of view is to be understood, even if it leads bouncing ideas of certain intellectuals, (such as P*****) i did enjoy revisiting these ideas, such a culmination of meta-understanding.
There is only the meta-philosophy, or even non-category philosogy. Let's not get too deepity in our literary work.
He blends physics terminology with naturalistic study with his conceptualisation. With an understanding of the intentionalism, derived and original as a passageway towards his argument for free will compatibilism. Intellectual stimulation that brings me back.
These concepts are going to stimulate me back again.
Now that's meta, such philosophy really show the strength of the written page medium-wise.
Wow, My doodles are getting skeeeeetchy Should I quit with the doodles?
"Lemonade? Please.
You are my best friend"
Catharsis, interpassivity, negative states of being must be explored to provide a means of conflict.
Be it contempt, hatred, death, and the most radically evil darkness of the universe. Everything must be not touched.
There's a thing in advertising called negaphobia, where the tastes of being good mannered, or people covering their own butts. Fixation of conventional manners, educational etiquette. Hackneyed serviceability and the like has led to a lack of conflict.
From school of coddled brands, covering the backsides, and the oopsy daisy.
Unless the conflict is static or jumpy within erotica or radical antiplots. I doubt this format of reinnovation has become a dependence. Commodified like the rest.
The scum bob wiki is the perfect personification of this negaphobia, a stakes and negativity had to be ironed out in order to fit a chocolate box, beaming and.. Repetitious.
The anti-plot, or anti-story existential plays such a Waiting for Godat, and Krapps Tape also point this out, They're more in a non-profit art sense though.
When Mean-spirited and torture is defined so broadly is means anything without anything, into the non-entertainment of slice of life and wholesome.
Man do I miss stakes like the Boondocks or the Smiling Friends.
Lagos Enri for Realism Dialogue of conflict, Robert Mckee for the more symbolic, on-the-nose dialogue (Including some other examples). Scumbob wiki? Nah.
This cussy documentary of a youtuber MagicMush that I have mixed opinion is what I referenced, I'm only it for the kinship of the autism that I have. 30 min, I'm refereing 8 - 15
Careful, scams on BSKY are raising, artificiality without truth seeping through the cracks. So, I'm going to repost a favourite where scammers seem to pass fraud as fact and treat my neurotypical disadvantaged as prey.
It's inevitable these are going to crop up and be made into get-rick quick schemes by predatory robbery.
Grief-baiting, that's a curious concept, thank you. These are merely copywriting tricks being misappropriated again.
The last one was the case for the screenshotted image. They had, hym, 4 or 5 emergency fundraisers in the brief history I went through. Though the rest of their posts looked bot or scam farm-like. If a person is running that account, they are just grief baiting to see what gets more reposts.
Usually, making multiple scams that you can find in the post history is more common with real people, but I think Bluesky makes deleting post history harder, so the scam farms may just count on folk here not being on guard to check post history just yet. So, be wary.
I always get folk like "well what if they just aren't active? "
Isn't the reason you directly donate to a person, instead of a charity, because you have no idea if the charity is using your money correctly?
So why wouldn't you spend any time to avoid giving a scammer money?