Commidyfying Commodification

Copyrighting copyrighting, Self referential metamodernism into what appears to be the opposition of meaning and then towards at hyperreality where nothing can be sincerely enjoyed any more, and then it's too pure again, back and forth, back and forth.

So that's the trap, it's never-ending. It's a concept, it's not measured.

Thinking about this video

Had some disagreements with the golden mean and Peter skinner, at least what Peter Skinner was not as contentious as other works. Yet I did not know how self-referential has been used by artists when nothing else can be referenced, unless it get slapped.

So as with our texture to weave patterns that are meaning is made. With recursive recursion the perfection of advertising of attention retention provided by the advertisers being the perfection, yet circular reasoning it is that's unpersuasive.

HyperDirect

Directly measured things are going to matter to those who seize it,

Not in an opportunistic way, yet generous. Inorganic reaching to the point of connecting on with a way that can open a door, a call to light is the call to action.

Beyond the race to the bottom, and the commodification and the attack of our attention to anything, there's the moment of stimuli that makes us a whole new being that we are aware and restructure for our own ends. Then the attention stimuli is rendered anew.

Finally, even with such commodification of indirection and the commodification of our direction, there's still our decisions that we make all day and into a new passage. Knowing and understanding- the control of the mise en place is the first step.

Even when the funds, and the time runs out.

Such transactions, that are not commodified, are intrinsic.

What are we to do when our attention and time are not commodified?

~Couch Gregor

What's worser than a hack...

Somebody who does not create via formula, somebody who is unaware of his mechanizations.

Staunchly formulaic and derivative is one pleasant thing, another is completely giving up on the short-termism of the specification.

Pro-Producer rather than the flinging passive consumer position.

 ~Couch Gregor

All copywriting is parody, or caricature

Commodified and slop by definition and profession?! Say it ain't so.  The reason I study slop is I can clearly see the antithesis. The attempt to make a work of art and art work continues. What's Copywriting for? Cleaning the dishes? Oh well, own it.

All this was to attempt to make something out of a factory shop of furniture, making inspiration come from weird places.

With Song, that's it.

All propaganda is hackneyed, it has to be on the nose with the theme, simple, direct. Not clever for its own sake. So it's direct and in-your-face by design, to the point of it causing agreement or disagreement.

I don't know where this mediocractic line, you don't, yet I'm paranoid.

Avant Garde Artist to Hackneyed graphic design. Interactions of commodities and vision.

Crosswordism of epistemology: Susan Haack

Notes! 

Crosswordism, a conciliatory epistemological framework of viewing the world for out philosophy, of complete true justified belief. Yet here we are, some of here essays are good, some of them are not. Regarding Neurlanaysis and the overwriting of very within the language.

I gravitate towards Stephan Jay Gould and the mismeasure of man, along with Delusions of Gender as authority sources of Cordelia fine in regard to that. (I'll have to reread it.)

I wanna leave phrenology to the academics, I'm an artist/entertainer first.

Nobody's perfect with my wabi-sabism, So I take a bit from there, a bit from that. Now, such a visualisation of 3-dimensional epistemology is a way of reasons and clues being evidentiary experiences. Wow, she does like paradoxes, as do I within my fiction.

Well, that's ambiguity, that's a way to approach an essay or a fictional work.

Later she critiques the further industrialisation with academia and that's reflected or the orderisation and packaging of student into products that's a simple way with SAT tests, that later is the golden lining that brings with topics. Ad agencies lines of thinking that Seth Godin that has thought, or that he has to seek.

Attorneys being representation of advocacy rather than scientist being that of the pursuit of knowledge. Along with other distinctions, if you ignore thing, she provides a good framework for paradoxes and a 3-dimensional way of seeing discourse.

Trippy, man. Things for the philosophy are to be questioned, nothing is safe, from copyright and curious questions, a lot of questions, and then there's answers.

I'd recommend despite the odd bits.

Folk/academic horse sense Etymological simple/sophisticated

Another outer inner Claude Hopkins Scientific Advertising, which determined the markingtese of salesman and their hacks for surplus accumulation.

How it comes, some merely want to cut to the chase. (Fundraising) while others want a more romantic treatment for the more literary types. Yet, people know that if they are treating this medium as a money-making mechanism (microblogging and direct messaging especially) the risk of burning trust becomes apparent.

Yet all of us seek to keep their budgets with our creative projects.

Make it so that whenever to simple it down, and not dumb it down. All concern and curiosity of the prospect with the specifics flirted.

Fickle'n Fleeting, Deshowmantize

Stuff writing has taught, that audiences that chase the latest mass market trend are not going to step off the carousal. Writing with the limited showmanship of literature can be a humbling experience, some say it's harder to write a game than it is to program it.

All part of the process rather than the results that appear fresh of the social media, which everything is not sacred there from the vulgarisations of the internet. The amount it takes to verbalise thoughts with sucking others with jingling keys respects other literacy, which I hope to increase and illuminate, not level up. Yet shine a light.

A bit of an enlightenment and not a metric based metric, I know, we are talking soft skills here, stuff that's hard to measure. Where ideas and the enrolment matter and conceptual abstraction helps make this a testing ground.

Not like going viral and monetizing was an option today, despite other companies capitalizing off it. Well, you give what you take with those under the .com things.

Even copywriters, and certain commercial novelists, how do you deal with mass ignorance? Nobody want's to read with attention and time commoditized into content, and at this point. It's merely our keyboards verbalising our thoughts.

Into owning the marketingese definitions, the squealing Typology.

Typology/taxonomy is something to consider for... urgh, marketing.

All the Casua Sui, or it's a fiction that's like that. Any aesthetic enterprise or ensemble.

Brand is typological, defined by nothing contingent by metrics or epistemology, it's intuitive. Indirect.

Direct advertisement is dependent on measurement and metrics. It's all generalising and stuff, estimates that are not accurate.

This is all left to the producers demands of a product first, unfortunately that will have to remain as a legal fiction. It's what commercial models and copywriters do, they have to deliver a product. They have to be hacks. Functionalism is there existence. The delivery of specifcations, unlike the matter.

Nobody talks with the markingtese of brand, and they don't speak of measurements. Function commercially with the commercial taken out of cease to function. Their inauthenticity is what makes the function.

Ads and advertising, ads serve that function of turn and towards with the matter, to re-turn, it's the point of direct functionalism that means.

This is all the thought'n ideology of capital, so that's how it is with Cartesian work ethics.

Esoteric/Exoteric

Other than the luck

Outside in inside out.

Such as the way of the esoteric discussions must be made into the communications of the outside world to an exoteric domain.

For familism to novelism, to the other way around. Even with the Egyptian specifications, who remade their crafts toward the avant gardes. Out of sociological reasons, there it is again, we are going round to a status play. To our governance.

I keep moving through this conceptual distinction, from that to the last. Discovered and made into better specifications, or not scaled for intentional craft.

Contributions to the age of sceptics

 The collective consciousness has spoken. Everbody's jaded. So it's our time to see if it's time to move from the copywriting, from action towards age of belief.

•  Politicians
•  Grifters and scammers
•  Spammers/Trolls
•  Slop/< Only applies to literary types
•  People who don't read
•  People who don't choose to read
•  Certain authority positions in general
•  Technocrats
•  Hardcore Gamers
•  Tantrum-throwers
•  Industry complex apologetics
•  Imposters not being pretentious
•  Tantrums
•  Hustle culture
•  Toxic Positivity/Dogma
•  Anesthetization
•  Vulgarisation

Computational vortex, justification

  C - "with" opis "Power-wealth"

Status behind, governance, implied politic

Power Wealth behind.

This is the basic sociological principle underlining each and every action of using interface design of interaction of media companies.

User or be used. Media platforms and its popular publishers aren't our friends.

So It's okay to give your self permission to make bad art, bad for what? If it has intent, then it must mean something else into another time. Immediate responses that don't count cannot be the only thing that matters.

Oh, All this action is directionless within the vortex, how that ain't talked about.

Indeterminate of pretension to convergence

What a complicated way to say focus. Yet logicians in philosopy don't pull there punches when talking there jokes to academics.

Such as the troubles of learning to forcibly focus, isolated and into the trials.

Not wanting to be picked, not being selected within the right place in the right time.

Merely sticking towards a Wacom screen and not looking at the second screen. Along with thinking as an unglamorous producer, then not. Wrestling with the plumber paradox.

A ditch digger though, what a method to loosen writer's block, to loosen it's holding.

Then, when it publishes, the body of work continues.

So what is ultimately sold to the advertiser on platforms is tension, distilled.

Behaviorism does not work

 Repetition, recurrence, advertising patterns don't change us.

Especially if the concept is mediocre, or plain indefensible.

So that's the hope for a new concept, in its abstraction is the thing that ain't tested within the reality of the now, it's only a matter of time such a conception is to begin.

Believe me not, there are those who cannot figure out what the word means, when it comes to concept and to the idea of having an idea. Oh, that their words do not reflect from their minds. Maybe there is no internal dialogue and all pre-determinations, well.

Despite the frequency rule of advertising (Stop till your accountant gets bored). It becomes apparent there's a need to switch it up. Pivot for interest, or stick to the usual kind.

Overexposure can breeds loss of dignity, so focus on anything else on that.

A transaction first, a service/product

 Let's look at the Hierarchy of taxonomies, informal groups that organise to. Or belief systems that are made and secured into boxes.

Some people are so concise with their attention and time, then it becomes a matter of hurrying up towards succinctly and seeing the point of view from outside in. Because this is the way things are structured from the idea inside.

Simplicity towards complexity

Informal, not illiterate. Copywrighting Translation

 There's certain rules copywriters can laterally apply to their own writing, other times there are not.

Mass communications of action towards a specific work of art, Or communicating academic concepts of specificity, gatekeeping within those fields do matter though.

Another means of understanding a copywriting technique is the informally to make sure one performs as intended from the sceptic, yet to not skip out of the illiteracy.

From General and specific, if one hopes to publish oneself, that copywriting towards a target someone is something to consider with all the ideas that are floating around. Crafting towards the centre of that, becoming informal to the point of connect, not to invite antagonism.

That's the interaction with the public.

Proud of pretension, Tension to compel.

What is the point, going ahead, being a leader. Where things don't end to work. Where all the things lead into the land of where it's all community this or community that.

The start of a community, though, is one where Community's of practice that lead into fresh ideas. With every idea of status leading into a new pretension. From one moment of which to lead into the moment.

From the flat moments, everything where there is no conflict, there is no propulsion of our ideas into a new direction.

What a spark, what an incitement, what a pull.

Not obsessive compulsive disorder.

The deep end, Sophomore

Creativity means, within the genre and what is professing, something must be different.

That's the point, the point of exploring new craft. It's going to be deep at first, internal if interest the out of the outerest. Where the murky depths call out for a pearl, a pearl of wisdom from the foolish shallows.

Best to eliminate all sophomore and oxymoron wish fulfilment.

Oxy-fool.

Even if the exceptionalism burns, it's axis is different.

Performative Affliation, Underhanded Games. Desire for direction.

 You'll never know the direct games within the performance metrics unless you know the full record.

Many indie publishers working on the public side play the metrics, feed the algorithm, then try to save face by talking about how to excuse them.

Rachel Hollis is a perfect example, all the inspiration porn advice in the world yet does not hide the face that he married to leverage from Disney entertainment and then went to organising parties with celebrities.

We will never know if we use direct communication such as impack copywriting to make others more honest.

It's not all fun and games.

Transference of feeling

Such a matter of belief, that makes it.

The way the call to action, or transaction is a culmination of building trust and attention with the user, for that moment, the moment of belief that is not a lie.

Where it's all on the line, deontological, that is. That's another matter.

The nation of salesman and hacks within the western world got this clear, at least they articulated a command clearly without doubt. To give the benefit of the doubt of the others in ways of communion that I've never seen quite so much.

Merely remove the commerce part of the equation.

If it's a lie, then it's a hustle, scam or swindle, Without that transference of feeling. There's a internal placebo to it.

Oh, if it was all so sure.

Belief opposite, scepticism.

Increased Scepticism = Decreased Responses (HGL describe the rule)

And possibly more reaction.

Amusement carasol

 Laughter loops that take us. There's reason that those whose profession in amusement don't deserve respect from other professions. Since amusement cannot work within law, health and financing.

Such is a natural property of the communicative medium, the message of the medium won't be learned from a book rather than a cartoon TikTok

Clowning for the sake of clowning, cleverness for the sake of cleverness, buffoonery for the sake of buffoonery. Such a way that goes around and is the silly status roll that goes nowhere. The publishers and it's trail of SEO, of the status that follows the most and leads to nowhere.

If that idea leads to new ones, that so be it.

If there's no direction and only amusement, then that's a warning sign of the narrative at play.

Amusement ain't resistance, not the "need to laugh or you'll cry", it has character like the rest of it.

When copywriting/business negotiation, don't amuse and communicate.