Interrupt the popular bad idea

Persuade or perish, so they say.

Yes, I do advise not getting gouged by a bull in a china shop that does not know it's dead with the tranquilisers in, or read/listen to the room. Yet all those preconditions are not known.

Bull needs to be left in the china shop or be gored by its horn, so no horned dilemma. Leave the stadium of horned dilemmas.

While making more sense in entertainment, less so within the politics, academia and specialised fields.

Unpaid labor, social clout and bandwagon. Such is a matter that there could be a grift or a spammer behind the scenes of meaningful connection.

I'm getting old.

 

Don't contradict activists

 Yeah, activist flowing

Nothing I can't win like attempting to contradict anger. Anger and fear are irrational, and they are the things that you irrational cannot handle. It's the way things have been.

Utility = outcome deon = Intrinsic justness

Is this a call to action to become the editors of all non-mediocrity, or am I trying to interpret it? Yet with the neoliberal paranoia, it looks like this interpretation may not last.

It was all an overview of the course of an art lawyer.

So is the social media machine of advertising revenue of commodification and all that manner of commercial law that it will lead into?

I'm dipping back into Bryan's files and papers again with social sciences; he's trying to argue for the moral philosophy. Being a lawyer, it's his job. Browsing online, with it are all the ways of stochastic gradient descent. Aligning with and heightening of the commodity relations within sociology.

A blank slate, although not reflective of the equilibrium of epigenetic distribution of each and every telonomy of the enabling constraints and biomechanics, can lead to governance away from heriditarian authority. Or aristocratic, exceptional pretensions.

Wow, that's avoiding eugenics here in regard to judgement and police formation.

two types of DNF

As is one of lack of material time constraint.

One of lack of mental care, of the volume that's made Or Seth described impact.

Another is a lack of interest; it goes back to the idealistic ways of the terminology of marketingese, such as 'brand'. Along with the material manners with direct response.

Do you think Seth looked at all the smut and went 'wow' If you a/b test everything that you get from a porn site. Failing to elaborate on that, merely the banal nature of such is the spam and commodity, or am I looking in the wrong spot?

Even though it's fine to go that direction, even if there's not difference of the pin-up

Third reason could be a ragequit, those results may vary.

Proscenium opening

https://billingblox.chargefield.com/

That impression in a world of billing boxes of post-commodity delight. Frantz Fanon called the forgotten the 'Black'. The proscenium, with the desire of the other.

With the need to reach complete entertainment of our satisfactions from Hegel. With these regressions and progression of direction of our arguments, it meant to show within the social media colosseum.

How is it that those conflicts and recollections, we are the centre of them?

Sometimes with a high-status market category, it's hard to fix. Can do what to do without the permission of groups.

Beyond Commodity Relations

Modes of production and commodity relations – all that affect our cognitions and extensions. This could be the bundling with the trying to capture the meaning

That was what Althusser was about when he examined dialectical materialism, which has gone through sociology and economics. Yet the fixation on such an ontology can only lead to blindness, sub-blindness to the perceptions of all phenomena and interpretationism, from the literal matters. 

Thats his diagram of, I follow the crosswordist image of cosiliance

Simple and complex pleasures, by utilitarian Jeremy Bentham. That if a philosopher is unsatisfied, then an animal wants more of that inside-out desire. The banal and the elite – yet to the postmodernist, they deinterpret all meaning into non-hierarchical demergence.

So, no wonder it makes a case, as people rejected such questionnaires.

Yet from the pragmatists, and even by extension of liberal policy. Then comes a time with all the useful fiction of easily measured money and eliminative materialism.

I lurk now, and the audiences of other posters who go on TikTok and do these 

Pleometric produces.. odd work, and with Neural Fizz, Arika and the Amoebas.

@pleometric

"do people watch this slop?" yes and they love it. The thing about short form is that worse is better, things are meant to be consumed, discarded and remixed into new strains. The slop is the point."

Really? So worse ? Better? Or a sweet desire to post and define practice in another area of distribution. This workerism, defined as Immanuel Kant's miserablism and John Locke's conception of property as a monopoly of deliberation, is only going ot become a different conception of ownership.

That's okay.

incoherent, inconsistent, incogent, incongruent, incohesive

Reading Susan Haack's coherence, consistency, cogency, congruency, and cohesiveness – don't go overboard! To add that to the crossword mindset of syenchism of 'pragmatics'

I don't know if this is the one hustlers use to dismiss and race to the bottom, yet here we go.

All allowed under the suspension of disbelief and unreality. We are allowed thought patterns with the credence of our monistic attention to the circumstances. These are the elements. That comes from the spectator and for the prosumer spectacle, to the consumption of hegemonic thought. Spotting each point so that the suspension of our own phenomenon reflects the character's mind, our third-person omnipotence.

The pedantic Co's may not be the point.

In laymans terms

The first impression may the only thing that matters, when the outsider blocks or pays attention further to the facsimile of the auto-advertisements of social media, something birthed through the direct response mail order posting, from
Lester Wunderman.

Is that being deflationist? Is that what they mean by streamlining a heuristic of attention capture?

Well, no one will pay more attention to the first impression of one's work than the creator.

Pop goes the impression, as Satoshi-kun says, experiential to the immediate and the moment of long-term expanse. That's one way to look at it.

What is the best craft for the illiterate?

What is the best heuristic that respects Occam's razor more likely? Or the deflationist's first impression of creating the finest grape juice? The highest artificially

Appealing to the short, illiterate feedback loops of erotic perversions for the sake of it.

Then there's the logograms, of not exaggerating the exaggerated, to not lead into hyperbolic messages.

Well, the simple first impression does make sense with the direct advertiser it's making that way.

Simple front impressions.

Bip bip bip.

You can lead a horse to water

You can't make it to drink.

Such is coercion and undermining the intrinsic justness of communication, of external and internal alignment.

(Let's not phreno again, oop.)

Status conventions, of informal organisation of it all, of the mental relationalism of our phenomena. That, along such indication that his hyper-measured within the direct response of social media.

That genre, that expectation can never be read, with the externalised craft there and out.

That's all the temptation of promotion or social status, from the lump
of leap of what one ought to do with it, once it's out in the wild.

All in the realizations others have self-governance, and all its troubles.

Pagliacci Syndrome of Ikigai

Since a product and service, from the feudalistic aristocracy (Kingdom/Owner) and bourgeois industry revolution. (Worker/owner), time moves with the scientific management, unintentionally or not

Pagliacci broke his performance to shoot a heckler which reminded him of him being cuckolded, or, so I mishear, the story. Are they times when through the emotional labour.

When will our design of Ikigai of understanding the teleology, this framework of qualia that brings use to a desire, is acknowledging our enormity.

The enormity of the algorithm and mindless, incomprehensible. Apparently I'm dripping in and out of theists with the substack dive with an 'ontological activist'. In and out, refreshing, and I know it has a problem. Something about it attracts me since the hustle of Bluesky is, too, impersonal.

Do they distinguish between Inauthentic artifice of our craft and our own, backstage selves with put off the mask? ( oop, almost doxed myself there ) The problem arises when authenticity becomes another tool of symbolic capital, and high school sociology.

A western concept of performance, and a teleological concept of self-determination from the east.

This is World needs and good at is where all the salesman is, with the thoughts of what we love doing, to where the desire to kindle the child chaos into the adult order.

How to put on a face to show a self on this blog, and then pull it off when I put it off. Foundherent back and forth, of sincerity and sociological interaction, is that of a community with the mask of my own self that I show to the world.

Look at the crazy take on self-determination, it's not the reductionist one on financial drive.

Oh, there's an edutainment, jokey one on creative mediocrity by Cuckfucies, of absolute mental illness specificity, take that entertainment.

"In 2025, the term “creator” is a near-sacred word.

Every kid wants to be a YouTuber. Creative work is in some way the new White Collar. The dream has evolved from Fake Easy Email Office Job to Meaningful Expressive Creative Job.

With such a value premium placed on creativity and artistry, a parallel ecosystem of discourse has arisen:

Discourse *about* creating, discourse about the *type of person* who creates, and so-on. This post is technically part of that discourse.

A definition:

Creativity **** is any post, video, or essay *about* creativity in the abstract."

I do like the unannounced

WHUUUUUUUUUUU DAR with his own creation.

The comedy is finished!

Public domain, the rawest expression of the commons

 What the means to express oneself and to express the freedom to expression!

Out it goes, and knowing no means of axiology to predetermine itself and form a solid idea, yet. We form the bumps together.

This leads us to our own ways on interchange of ideas and play, so that it is.

Non-binding, primitive, there's no a-prior property right, only when it's revealed and the declaration is done.



Bonus Link
Tragedy of the commons. Pah. More like magic

The land of no boundaries of business guru maxims

 This vision were all the matter. 

With mass advertiser. Goes into the hustle trance.

The way of the machine zone of playing an eternal economy game of physical pleasure/pain, all the complexities between. With the emotional ways and emotional states, compared to the physical states.

Then I'm trying to clamber for an extension, then I'm not, getting substack posts via business gurus, are well, people who happen to keep working, it's all the advice of people who keep workings

How is the motivation doing, self-industry complex? Any benefit? You don't have to follow any of this advice if you don't have a problem. They are nebulously reaching for better within the void of extrajudicial lands.

Thanks, I guess, then there's that phrase in snarl quotes.

Personal brand, not caring about strangers. Guess that's the confirmation a publisher does using the legal fiction. With what a publisher does after all the labour is all collected, his personal value judgement is there.

I can't blame that kind of mindset, if he's running an independent, giving free advice if it does not work or not.

At least you're not selling anything, bud! Well, bought into this.
Took your test on your blog.

Such entertainment 🛋️💭

There you go, into the sunk cost of getting a book deal (or not) I know you're trying to help. With words of authenticity cropping up again (Illusionist entertainers aren't), then it's the reason this will go.

Where will you stop with the how-to roulette? Reverse engineer.

Well, continue on with your generalities.

(You could consider pablum, what do you think?)

This one's fascinating though, creator economy he's coined? Idk, this may be what publishers give a sunk cost to creatives (Petit boug) Who happen to build their labour of signals of distribution.

Have some more, Philosophy wannabe. Signalling is talking about semiotics? I'm still reading that Umberto eco book with all the academic reading.

He's a slow-down kind of man, I'm a stay-in-sync-with-yourself-man

Solving problems? I like to give my characters problems.

Well good sir, good going on a sunk cost. 🛋️👍 Like I am.

"Stay Sovereign" Was the email.

Getting under someone's skin

Rage bait, Oxford noted This is the word that of those who use

Well, even with the direct response tickers here. Even as the liberal Seth goes on, (Why do I still follow? Well, it's on trolling, and those who try to crawl and squirm under your skin.

Yet this engagement is what it is, teleological presumption reveals parts of the character. From the accuser rather than the accused. That's Friedrich Nietziech for you. That perspectivism, (Some conservatives share that aswell.)

Come one, and come all.

Fox Key
" It's so weird how the people who most claim to hate social media, technology and modernity are the most unable to leave it. At some point that's just a failure of character. Like, fine, everyone needs a phone to get around and email people or use Slack or Teams or whatever. But did you know that most normies don't use Twitter? It's true. Most normies are already better than you! "I'm too addicted and Twitter is making me post every day about how much I hate Twitter!", brother, most people do perfectly fine without scrolling on social media 200 times a day. "I'm posting to warn others and do praxis", actually, you're posting because you're addicted to praise and the follow number going up has created a psychological dependence. And it's fine, but if you hate it so much it's a failure not to leave it. "

Noble Savage act

"The whole thing is a really nice populist narrative for super online people. It works well because it proposes this idea of web capture, not due to user preferences and shifting technology, but because evil CEOs want it. But it doesn't align to reality

.‪Key 🗝 🦊‬ ‪@keytryer.net‬· 1d
I don't like Doctorow/Zitron noble savage user view of the web, which to my understanding is: 1. Someone makes up a service that becomes popular 2. It's bankrolled for a while by investors 3. Eventually, founders decide they need to make money. They change the design/algorithms/ads."

One of my annoying patterns, institutions do, is to advertise themselves as voices in the wilderness. Yet we have industrialised society. That simply ain't the case.

If you're doing public relations, you're doing public relations and speaking for a team that's building up for a performance. Company or not.

Or is it some buzzword, coalition, group, comradeship, meeting, b-corp, corporate and Team.

They conceal with the same signifier, if its representative or single, do claim it. Save a lot of confusion and vulgar populists.

So there it goes.

In the wilderness, a badposterior, Iconoclastic, contrarianian, unjustified.

Into the wilderness. Away from civilisation and being a civilian.

novelty =/= originality

People can be original, and still be insufferable.

Newness and the one an only uniqueness are not the same, Given the progression of time for each. One Direct response (extend) and the cognition (brand).

Newiness, we know the news can be ignored if it ain't emergency room stuff.

The others have gone through the gauntlet of conflicting symbolism, through pundit or cute to the blips of hosts/platforms. Well, professionals that don't attend.

If that the thing is one is first and lucky, then that ain't good enough. The law of diminishing returns takes it toll.

speed format conclusions

Badmouse said that streamers earning fame ( or infamy symbolic relatable capital ) and money hinders the overall struggle.

I say, yeah as an activist, no as an entertainer. Yet, do these editorials say otherwise, ho ho ho, well, you do encourage me Harlen.

Staying in sync is the most important of all these.

Since streaming is the best take to be able to manage ones one personal space, there's no editing, one clear distinction between editing (non-sync) and unediting (sync).

Leaving a trail, editing along the genealogy of ideas to pluck out moments of consciousness. That is one sense, to bring verisimilitude with the work.

Hypocritical Stream of consciousness is the point. Inconsistent bibliography.

(Wip for environmental sketch for HPComic)

So, I haven't read James Joyce yet, guess I'm not a savant.

Yet this stream of consciousness where i entertain thoughts without committing to them fully is point, if they get offended or not, outside my purview, like how did can be responsible for that?

Is disclosing a bibliography a rant? Not that i know off, well, it could be a that i disclosed and overshared. Well, the bibliography is the part where one should overshare. Those are all the sources.

Authors can be authors without becoming authoritative on this, under there own volition of responsibility to do what they want and not intrude into others self-defence function for each other, co-exist.

They can be direct with me if my indirect bibliography in this blog.

🛋⭐

Here it is. Minus the sex joke.

"Heya, bibliography thoughts on Ai. (Hopefully I don't get blown up by a butlerian jihad like in dune ) It's not that simple. So it's why I'm showing it. @sunnmcheaux and @Austinmconnell has done reasonable takes, Flazfire has done a video on Twitter Artists and how annoying they are, yet I think he's wrong on plagiarism and environment. That's youtube. Alexander Avile is the top banger though. As for environment, the accurate take was by Andy Masley on substack, I'm being anti-doomer on this while taking a more preperationist stance like Neil Postman. Reading his Technomoply and Amusing ourselves to death.

It even intersects with Media Theory, Tim Wu Attention merchants, Matthew Bartholmew Adcreep, Seth Godin This is Marketing, (He has done a course on AI) Doug Ruskoff The Merchants of Cool and the Generation Like Documentary. Even Harlen Ellison The Glass Teat and the Second Glass Teat editorials on the television industry complex. Herschel Gordon Lewis books on copywriting. Woo! Foundherentism of evidence matters is why all these theories intersect like a crossword, By Susan Haack. Moral theory to Deontology and Utilitarianism somewhere in the background. Thank you! Phew 🛋️💨 Feel free to ask questions."

Yet, I know with this prosumer culture, do they care? Am I showing off? Or is it the part that is required? Well, it matters to those who read, no point to those who are illiterate, or the post illiterate now.

Can't lapse into consistency for consistency’s sake. Or simplicity for simplicity due to me not being able to face the Curse of knowledge with these simplified platforms of micro-blogging memes and gag shorts.

Those platforms are designed for those who don't read, and don't have a bibliography there, I will have there. It will remind me of the curse of knowledge which will permit me for another post.

reductionism/holism

 Finally, a word that's opposite of reductions. By Julian Baggini who's been reading contemporary philosophy, well, some would call this pop philosophy, at least I had to get it.

Reductionism served its manner with the attempt of the sciences, and economical means, this verification does not translate to the art and aesthetics.

Realism maths contingent on money, right? Everything down to profit, right? It's not so simple.

Holism (Even associated with odd practices, this is outside of it. Complementary medicine, mysticism) It is the combined efforts of strategic systems that Aristotle, the macro-level of the taxonomy, such is the view.

Why is it the matter of the internet thinking that entertainment and advertisement, of the reductionism model being all there is, that the TL;DR. Concision and cogency for the sake of it.

So, the copywriter and industrialist are distinct, mistaking the parts from the whole.

Mass ad incompatibility, Post interruption ad age.

Television advertising ain't incompatible with internet, why?

Along with it's 90s origin, it was not meant to be like that. Designed for one to one with minimal video hosting.

Foundations on interruption advertising, with a platform especially without foundherentist lifeboat on the sea of the internet, it's a race to the bottom.

A rift of an internet and a mass marketer, the internet user, from world I inter was designed for a specific one.

People have written about it, Tim Wu and other ethicists to anti-consumerism. Tim Wu has written about it in with James William article being quoted. To saying the remote control is the first adblocker to exist. For the glamour medium, that's the one that draws in the most illiterate audience, and it's crowd.

(Not that bad movie when it comes with remote controls)

There's a rift now, even with marketers have noted with Seth (wow, quoting him again despite my criticisms ) https://sphinx.acast.com/akimbo/they-renottryingtobecreepy/media.mp3
I mean he has written about mass media extensively, perhaps with commodity fetishism, yet here we all see and notice.

Brad Guiger says that using interruption is akin to the shooting oneself in the food, Stephanie Sterling has moved to Patreon as with DJs Like Isaac Varzim. Others remove ads entirely, and Full Moon Matinée has removed it entirely.

Predictions of where mass advertising is going.

. Will still remain, as with all axiological concern, is suspended to make it continue with advertising campaign.
. Scepticism will still remain, any user who's based on the sole business model will have to make the sceptic feel right.

. Since it's not going to go away, Interruption advertisers will have to face that anarchists will continue to use it. That's always going to happen as they uncommercialise everything
. Lack of clarity of using interruption advertiser can lead to downfalls like Ello
. Advertiser-friendly and word-friendly words of babyspeak are and have contribute to adversial relationships
. Scamvertisements, unregulated, irresponsible interruption advertising. The Faustian bargain with them is that there is arguably the biggest race-to-the-bottom compared to subscriptions and direct donations.

. As noted with Matthew Barthmolows Ad-creep, advertisers and mass media have been equivocating free speech with commercial speech.

That's merely some of the challenges, as people set up guardrails.

Even Robert Mckee's stated that interruption advertising is going out, with statistics moving towards subscriptions and direct transactions.