A deliberate, non-serious response : Conservative art essay, and my aesthetic direction

(Is this complimentary doodle, Idk)

 This one, one with the funded kickstarter, apparently. I'll keep it low profile, I've already dived in to anti-positions such as porn, and now it's a conservative one (Intelligent at least.)

Made a good argument for consciousness.

• Hays code realism is on point. Best part.
  
  
  (They're still posts about this)
• Transgressive realism and dysthrophic realism are both confused, maybe he's being cynical with how everthing ia co-opted by reactionary capital? Doug Ruskoff the Merchants of cool documentary covered this phenomenon with mtv, test audiences and mtv. This is merely central institutions trying to resonate, you still have your romantic realism on a indie level.
• Is he nostaliging of the home of Classical realism

More of the American Jingo realism of GURNS.

• Who claims the aesthetic of this category of romantic realism? I'm more a gothic in the aesthetic realm, yet here's to a category exclusive to partisanship. Decide their entitlement to dictate women's bodies, its always weird, they are reminded they are not in control. Self-flagellation, and simply not that note-worthy, considering the Stellers blade and other designs not convening to that nuclear family expectation.

(That lara croft is unflattering comparison btw)

Pretty commissions and at least superhero stuff happening, I can see.

Peter Coffin went that these continuing qualia of interpretation of ideas, With these commodified into conventions of the trad-wife/stepford wive type of deal, at least that former Randian is trying his best to crawl by refuting romantic realism, I never had to entertain it.
How are labour is made to follow along the conditions of rule, into a commodified community to then circulate new aesthetics like this one.

Now for my own which I'll coin in aesthetical tastes. Here's my own taste.

Foundherent Realism or Gothic
Crosswordism

A combination of pragma and dogma, to bring forwards a manner which drive dialectical realism which is to pursuit of knowledge (Epistme) and the holism of the techne of art in its edges of mysticism. There are the ways that is can bring with a physical foundation, and the emergent culture of our arts, aligning with our conventions of hacksmanship, entertaining illusions of spectacle. Both dancing concepts. It can both handle abstraction and representation.

or so, with the industry of it's essence (The show must go on) Of Life's fulfilment and it's deaths decay. Embracing both of dialectic of structure and superstructure to help build a knowledge and culture worth fighting for. Or so that's strength, ( Provided with a Eric Helms autoregulation physical programming of the body.)

So what am I to do with the entertainment enterprise? Critique it? Endorse it? Well, You'll get it.

Shall the area of our immaterial reflect the materials anew, and bring a shine of new pragma and dogma. I wish it well. As originate from a classical past and reunify it from it's iconoclastic trappings. (That's from Schott Mclout

From the sublimely mawkish, compared to it's abject horrors. For they bring into our own urban fantasy they reflect our areas.

We where all sloppers in the prosumer, primordial soup. (Except for the Harry Potter bit.)

Have a sofa seat from my ref folder. A non sequitor.

https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/in-defense-of-slop

 Thing about a slop, its made us more mindful with our consumption, Our intakes and our Imputs, when we don't swing down the entire Burn-the-internet-memes-on-behalf-of-disneys-drm-repulsive-practices. It's made me think of pleasure, about shock value, about attention. In 1970s and it's a slow, absent doomerism that's only made me want to do something more.

Avoid mediocrity, and mediocre of the averages, with independence of vision. ( Wow, James Gurney, if that's a thing, Commodity fetishism'n all, it's banal now, so now what I'm going to do?)

That's the problem with slop, it's anti-positivist definition, not a metric. Going to like another bara pin-up now at my microblogging feed.

Well, there's an article that's made me think, including Andy Masleys

With all the slop, SEO and all the stuff, the principles of distribution remain the same.

Oh, they're trying to inspiration porn JK Rowling again, I'll post this Verily one

*Prosumerist, it's naturally, physically impossible to disassociate from consumerism. Only get post-scarcity.

at the end of 13:00

Why i may not be a comic artist.

Contemplation, I'll continue zining. Yet a need the negative space to propel forward.

• Low pay: Lack of wages since it's one of the passions that can't be fuelled and be profitable, that's a reality with most creative industries. Or, oxymoronically, it's due to creativity might not pay off, an indertinimate amount of trying to make something new.
• Abusive Supervisors with awful labour management practices/ No labour protections: This comes from expierence, I brushed with them twice , Well, with graphic design/illustrator jobs.
  I learned more from Eric Helms bodybuilding pyramid and then that. Realistic, enjoyable, and flexible.
• Hustle Mindset: Level up! Power scaling! Amelioration for the sake of it, when all the labour puts down with the distribution being sent online for a microblogging platform that only expects pornographic performances, or something to that of copywriting. A mental model that's never good enough with the metric that can harbour averages.
  
  There's a ladder, and there's a bridge to sell you, so many with the how-to-industry complex.
  
  
• Art is mere copyrighting commodification: Well, You know if you know. At least I know I'm a hackneyed entertainer for transparency of my aesthetics with what I show, like a magician's illusion, because I find it fun to hold attention. They do have a vanity with the delusions of grandeur. Especially with the industry of publishers of copyrighting for them with PR. Lack of self-respect with the field of not protecting there labour.

That's water is wet moment. Yet I do it anyway.

 Other than that, the vision of making a storyboard to life continues.

I dive in the black culture, Josh Johnstone and FD Signifier.

In the words of Josh Johnson "Art can save your life. But entertainment will never be your salvation." Sinners, I see.

Still following F.D Signifier, his one on Charlie Kirk had quite the intro. So this is the video where he goes into the Hollywood and vertical integrated media does to independent creatives. Oh the hacknification of it all. So that's being the welcome to the machine all over again.

I don't know if I'm an ally or not, I'll leave that to the black communities
to decide.

I'm in the autistic beep boop culture, learning disability. Along with trying to sort that mess, that's where I'm positioned amongst the community map.

F.d Signifiers makes culture preserving, even with that wrong ai water take he did. Even if he goes deep into the silly ends of hating the prosumer spectacle, which i seem to ignore, which others have taken a anti-vax like conspiracy mindset too. I'm hiding with the catgirl open sourcers till a lot of the smoke passes through.

Paul Klee

Those were by another hand. The last two. Anonymous of outsider art.

Materialist semiotics

Nice outsider art.

The beauty of our incoherence

Down to our linguistic beginnings.

Sememe, introduces new concepts that those most reductive concept of meaning. Along with its structuralism into a mindset of a wholistic splendour that I'm happy to delve in. Hopping from Lenin and Althusser and all those from the past of Marxist Leninism, it's certainly a dive into what it means to knowledge in post-llm era.

Such is today, as I've remained my sanity with Susan Haacks Foundherent Positivism/antipostivism synthesis, along with the criteria of the analogy of the crossword of figuring out a play of words to fit in within interpellated spaces, signifying meaning with the ways the lead into a holistic picture. So this book aligns with its knowledge, with the attempts to help bring a structuralist take on this new turn of events.

Casting down the singularity, while also brushing side the misrablism I see on microblogs.

Or, that's how it's seen, or what helped my soundness of mind with the LLM/diffusion provocateur wars between Musk/Sam Altman, with the forbidden fruit knowing a new framework that rejects of fundamental radicals (Except for the licensing ones) No fixedness with the sign and signifier, providing the structure of understanding an interpretation that fills the bowls.

So yeah, I did enjoy it, even at the little memoir at the end. There's little gems on the long tail of distribution like this. Do recommend.

Doing something you don't care about ; a good doomerist post

What happens when you commodify?

All merely at the breaking points rule of law?

Just do rule 34 art and tail popular entertainment campaigns?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just make sfw cutesy relatable comics while having no editorial work

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just do stuff at Buzzfeed with listicles and other things?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just just just.

I do respect this doomerist substack article.

The lonesome death of the last copywriter

"I’ve had a growing frustration with the way AI skeptics, especially my comrades on the left, dismiss the likelihood of mass AI job replacement by pointing to quality problems that are both easily and affordably fixed.

Most creative jobs in the US aren’t making art that people care about. They’re making corporate slop that everyone hates, but which is necessary for doing business. The only people who will miss the human slop when it gets replaced with AI are the humans who used to get paid to make it."

Aaah, respect. Well, If it happens or not, have a look.


Listening to te the one and only Garth Marenghi's Bursted Earth. Or I could listen to Snoop Dog's voice read voices to me on Speechify. Which is more mediocre. Seth said it best with his own doomerism, anybody hustler stuff that he can use Stable Diffusion that's pretty alright, or the one and only illustrators he alludes to.

Or that, not rehortically, more convincingly. So that's his commodity fetishism and prestige. Magic and mysticism that can't be judges from the algorithm mindless data-landscape.

George Bridgemans teleological

 From Aristotle and Hegel.

George Bridgman tried to teach a way of rymth to his students.

Purpose, destiny, and fate. Since I follow a sociological doctrine, involving constructions and instructions of function.

The internal purpose, or the motive they say within a presumption apprach was one of the ways George Bridgman taught.

Yet it's all writing lesson, all the experiences now that I follow a clearer approach with those who are methodological. Such a path that means that will one will flourish into new avenues. Thanks, to a new page.

Avoid digging those presupposition holes

 Be careful who you work for, that's what you give labour too. Or, the moral desert

Be careful who you believe as a means of coherence, that's what a presupposition is.

An opinion of prescriptive judgment, of all prescriptions and then the descriptive.

Intellectualism, well, it's a stuff you ask a scholar for. Seth Godins Liberal ramblings.

Fair Use advocates

Interpretability the first one next-

Since copyright is a state sanctioned monopoly. Non-binding and unenforced. Freelance contract workers and the useful fiction of firms. It's not a platonic natural law.

Fair use advocates are appearing out of the seams. I can only sympathise due to the misinformation of micro bloggers.

The technical term is infringement, not plagiarism, and it ain't a felony. More an embarrassment.

Propriety drm won't solve this. This lawyer questioned the nofakes act, I agree. Thankfully it's not in effect.

"Why you should be worried about the NO FAKES Act:

-Threatens free expression and fair use

-Expands copyright law with broad language and vague definitions

-Harms open-source AI and tech innovation

-Would impact transformative works like fan and remix culture"

https://ccianet.org/articles/the-real-costs-of-the-no-fakes-act/

Welp, wish it the best. The lawyer is getting annoyed with the concept of 'market dilation' I'd say due to long tail there'd be diffuse, and I'm looking into automation from other sources other than the old doctrine of dialectical materialism.

Creative service

Creative service Gabe? Well, I have my thoughts.

Venn diagram of industrial and artisanal modes of production! Marxist doctrine, a go-go.

Industry its stuff of labour and professionalism, and the firms. Right to the artisanal.

Marx, Keysein and the Marginal Austrian one with theory of economic value, scarcity to make a product.

Artist implies creativity of an individual, not a collective (Even if they have style guides and a place and trace.) Thats the industry of arc! Taylorism and Fordism combined to make it with scientific management.

So, The mode of production is required to ascend from hackneyed to creative. Select the factory, select the future.

Industrial hacksmenship, or marginal cost and value vis the artisnship of labour value. (That's the doctrine of Marxism for ya)

Graphic design and Illustrator, industrial, Contemporary art not so much.

There it is again, Commercial and Literary distinction again.

Nioce and calm. The Curse of knowledge. Still into Tech Journalism.

 My intellectualisms here, and the curse of knowledge. It's either use or be used
 
Tech means art and the study, and that's what it means, that's dialectical with the audience and with all the means today, so here's a beat.

Blender is still cool, like these demos. Even the youngmetameta with those classy pin-ups.as

Awwwwrrr such topology, re-topology, and form. along with the flex.

Impressive! Hands! Hands, gotta love dem expressive hands.

Sweet add-ons for the blender head. Kitbashing city.

I still remain a tech enthusiast here, oopit.

Pouring Bleach on my Epistemic Crisis

Pouring bleach down a toilet, to get rid of all the undesirables. This is the practice of doing editorials.

Aaah, punditry, the path of commitment, or of clownish pretentiousness. Gaming the attention economy, along with its feedback loops of freelance contract workers.

Such is the void/abyss, to divine in it.
So that follower list, that thing, undiscovered pouring and spring cleanings happen, unbeknowst of tiny unmeasured judgements, stuff beyond my purview right out of the grasp.

So time to be ameliorative! Time to consider both good and bad, then carry on.

Escaping the bleach titanic, cleaning everything. All this confusion, Epistemic crisis and hyperreality and all the mushy talking points, no leaders, all the silly talk, I'd have to trust a self or anatta, non-self to be proud off. All this financial computationalism in the air, it's all a malaise.

my masterfully crafted thumbnails

Or snoodles, doodles, making the way and little of life, pure play! Of the irreducible nature of our, the art to make something most divine.

They're play in the purest form, a foundherent structure of play that can lead into a set sequence of circumstances, or indeterministic orders that lead into other happenstances.

It's a moment of time, in the day, that I happen to entertain a moment of amusement for myself, then I share it, free of charge. It's free time expressed, and it's generous.

It may go away or may get bored.

Those little snippets of a quick impression, unrefined and then placed in my blog, they are what they are, and there now gone.

The NFT reflection

In attempt to develop an opinion of NFTs, couch Gregor does his research.

(This whimsical, low effort doodle is the only positive thing, other the thing at the end.)

(CW, abuse, slurs. And terminally online xwitterism Twitter artists used as a derogatory slur. )

A speculative, volatile market, it's marketing that Seth Godin has dismissed. ( Yet there are contradictory sources, had to check the Wayback Machine. It's an editorial, though, So I'll make my mind up. It seems more incoherent now )

I like it when I test my ideological presuppositions challenged

Welp, what were my experiences?

I was off, playing and depressed with League of Legends before this fad or not.

Yet things change, don't they?

Short version. Even it hinted at the climate thing that I'm considering. Oh, look it's more death threats, look, if you retweet and post death threats. I'm going to treat you as a mere acquaintance. It's not within my entertainment etiquette.

Bullying, doxing, suicide, wow, thanks I avoided the liberal circle and have not spent my days there.

Well, putting this account here, if you don't want to look at the full essay, I've been at it.

Here's him getting sidetracked on xwitter drama, it's amazing on YouTube you can post so much xwitter drama now.  Unlearning has done a Sowell now, which this libertarian with this time.

You don't even have to agree, yet he political convenience talking points that a propped as a means of twitter statecraft authority and response rates, No thank you, Dan, You were wrong here, empirically I'll have gone with experience.

Wabi Sabists must seek to find of avenues

Oh look, the obituary list so I guess it ain't dead. Where Micrological artists can continue to have a nice pint in the pub and wait for this to all blow over.

Yeah, he's right wing he admits, and a libertarian ancap (urgh did I admit to something along with lines of agreement, what a strange world) yet death threats? Sexual assault? Seriously, please. Please 😫 No more of that crud. On an advertising platform. An Advertising blog, panopticon made crazy.

The claims of environmental are similar, hmm.

So I decided to extend an olive branch, since there have been a movement towards cryptography with this technology, there's going to have to be another way to understand are foundherent conceptions of property rights. It cannot wait.

There's this guy who's got a Brian L Fyre papers, which are free to read. I enjoyed his comments on Marx being a literary landlord. Examining the contradictions within property laws, I do like to see it. As somebody who believes in the withering with creative commons laws, good on you. Cannot comment on the NFT open sea thing, though.

Schediaphilia/Fictionsexual

 Shedia = Something made by offhand.

Some quite in love with my designs, and with all those things that we see in ourselves with the things we draw and make become animation.

So when we see ourselves and our archetypes and hopes and dreams and fierce and despairs.

Well, maybe its an ode to the hackneyed task manager. We all do. Our creativity becomes designs while our designs become creativity.

This is a response to this, a premonition.

Critical Denial of tension, the outside

 This social media is another gauntlet, once that leads into tension of another, of wanting to get picked and selected for an opportunity and the influx of attention.

What a world outside that's our grass.

What a Nice expression of grass, one that makes me proceed to 2–3 hours with our days.

Types of societal/aesthetic edge

This video made me think of types to either split hairs or think of changing definitions.

Nioce entertainment editorial on the emoification of the media as political science influenced our society and entertainment reflected that, especially with that game with the hedgehog and the gun.

1. Edgy 
   Definition: Edgy emo is an exploration of themes of darkness and angst.
   
   I don't mind prescriptive and cautionary tales, dark art has always a been as much as horror has been around, edger allan poe's poetry, such as comes from the sprouts of gothic literature has been into our art and entertainment.
   
2. Anne D. Bernstein (Rest in peace) Could be possibly written this a point of Dariah's characterisation, yet this is all the matter of coolhunting shown through the documentary the merchants of cool by Doug Ruskoff Welcome to the machine.
   
   Marketing being neutral as with propaganda of ideological and material justifications, all that pillow. Well, as thinking marketised within sociopolitical contexts.
   
   
3. Another is when creativity and art, where meeting any criteria of measure ain't the point, or so the specifcation.
4. Another is race to the bottom and profit incentive* I forgot that.

Big Brain S*** Movies

 https://letterboxd.com/div_vs_film/list/big-brain-shit-only-my-faves-ranked/

Yep, one of the most expensive art forms, cinema of short stories get a recommended list via Couch Gregor.

I've been lurking and looking for potential Roger Eberts, Fantanos and new curators. They've been there, under the sea-level into esoteric circles of those who bring a function into the dizzying world of this culture.

I'm putting it here, sure, there's conflict theory and class analysis though, I'm not going to hold back on commitments tough. Radical Critique will still happen, even when it proceeds and changes and warps, from our entertainment reflection and our artistic interiors.

Curate Away, Div. Radical Marxist Critique. Curate away from the hermeneutics of media theory discourse. To and against our interpretation.

We need curators compared to our commercial publishers.

"what to do now?" Best *____* Sufficiency > Best

Here's some axiology and specs, although it shifts on the internet. Merely my attitude.

It's wrong to think that infinity of goods/services is a necessary been to believe, for it is an unmeasurable concept.

Sufficiency is the thing that fills the cup with the material baseherent (Baseherent, foundherent based on Susan Haack) conditions. With the knowledge, no perfect knowledge as the work continues.

It all continues, that's a mark of persistent in the face of adversity.

Guess I'll quote as practice.

G. A Cohen, "The promise of abundance is not the endless flow of goods, but a sufficiency produces with a minimum of unpleasant exertion"

Such a definition that can fit well with labour and with the creative to help auto-regulate. Auto-regulate to make it trial and error.

Can't have everything.

Love/Terror

Anekantavad Was pondering on dichotomy as an opposite of love, despite the one stated by The Story Grid Is Hate.

With this centred of axiology, though, then it's with Terror.

Nothingness, the stark unknown. With the depths, of our animals, to the natural state of being, that's made with the stark eyes that stare back. Both unnatural and natural totality of states circling and showing with all the feelings combined.

To our labour that's made with measured or not, Intrinsic and reaching to a definition of self and the exter
nal frameworks and structurations.

Then is all vanishes.

Poof!

Falling.

Falling..