Anxietys and what to do.

A moment to clear confusion, can be self-contradictory, that's the point for the creative profession that's euphemistic.

• Continue mise en place and mise en scène
• Breathing exercises body below and deep breaths for a minute
• Clear distractions
• Clear sigma grind set/hustle culture and don't let it make inroads
• Walk outside, don't track weight or performance metrics (or do meticulously, know what you're signing up for in this meticulous manner, have an exit strategy.)
• Feel outside, without rain, the air and the birds chirping for an analogue moment
• Bliss time from the hero of a thousand faces, have a folder of favourite soundtracks
• Clear communication
• Work in silence like Crumb worked on genesis

Commidyfying Commodification

Copyrighting copyrighting, Self referential metamodernism into what appears to be the opposition of meaning and then towards at hyperreality where nothing can be sincerely enjoyed any more, and then it's too pure again, back and forth, back and forth.

So that's the trap, it's never-ending. It's a concept, it's not measured.

Thinking about this video

Had some disagreements with the golden mean and Peter skinner, at least what Peter Skinner was not as contentious as other works. Yet I did not know how self-referential has been used by artists when nothing else can be referenced, unless it get slapped.

So as with our texture to weave patterns that are meaning is made. With recursive recursion the perfection of advertising of attention retention provided by the advertisers being the perfection, yet circular reasoning it is that's unpersuasive.

Character arcs, Creativity

Do they matter? Change or No-Change? Positive or negative? Natural?  With or without plot resolution...

I consider the writing of HpKomic

Characters don't need to change, they do need to be interesting. I don't even have to be likeable. There can be a likeness complex. Thing from the unadulterated symbolic or the more contradictory paradoxes and oxymorons that may be noticed within our lives.

too novel to be a novelist

 One has to recognize one has to be a pioneer when they happen to get the way of making a fresh idea stand on its legs. One that's meant to be the way of the first steps that nobody will recognize something novel since they ain't familiar.

Can somebody recursively be too pioneering to be a pioneer, though? Away from all the tropes.
Monetary and professional risk, that's a zesty concoction with is.

What if it's on illegible on sticks and impossible to decipher? Then that's too novel to be a novelist.

Some conventions need to be respected.

An ode to YTPs

Please, do protect the commons for providing free entertainment for the masses, YouTube poop, becomes YouTube gold. Bored teenagers making amusement and then back again.

Such a cycle of charity of entertainment was a gift to us, and we have to make it with our own ghosts of what were discarded commodified shells, making life again.

They still exist, projects made for the self-entertainment of a bunch of random kids where the ideation of good enough if the incongruity of a certain happenstance was to happen out of the expectations of the conflict portrayed. So too, shall they hit the good zone of what it means to pursue a hobby within what it looks like a juicy remix.

A juicy remix from the commons and the into the creative well-being of our own desires. Out of such silly free-market hockey, there are things that stick along within our times that I made from abadoned commercial dreams.

So that, such deliberate ignoring, do these blossom.

Y'know what they say

Sitar, The classical thrives

This is what it means to not be led by response rates, to not have the website made into a porn site through such actions. 

Mita Nag Sitar

Free, on YouTube, generosity, art'n charity, there at once with all the soundwaves hitting our eardrums.

Such is the generosity that is the gift.

Lewis Hyde defined the gift as

. To be consumed (not patronized by customer habitation and capture)

. To be moved on

So now with such a manner this was meant to build a commune of practice meant to be shared with others. Commodity or non-commodity. It's what a culture was like in the Stone Age.

Such a performance today it what our broad conception that does not exist. That our hobby and nonprofit endeavours that can be made, are made with this exchange in mind. Anthropology

Keep playing on. Still moving.

Generication;Genericide

Such a manner bridging the literary academics with the genre commercials, into the whole arena, then into elimination and recategorization.

According to brand manager, Genericide is when a good/service reaches it's indirect badging value. Or what, according to the marketer's commodification of the monopsony. Single buyer, many sellers selling that generality.

Oh, how do such a specific that it's brought to our minds when it's the individual. That's made.

That's a digression, though.

Speaking of genre and it's theories, it ain't fixed categorisation. Lincoln has written about it.

So despite the emergent genres of entertainment and art happening within the financial undercurrents, we can make it a choice to pick one that's serves our own conceptions and workflows. Oh, how money giggles in the background.

HyperDirect

Directly measured things are going to matter to those who seize it,

Not in an opportunistic way, yet generous. Inorganic reaching to the point of connecting on with a way that can open a door, a call to light is the call to action.

Beyond the race to the bottom, and the commodification and the attack of our attention to anything, there's the moment of stimuli that makes us a whole new being that we are aware and restructure for our own ends. Then the attention stimuli is rendered anew.

Finally, even with such commodification of indirection and the commodification of our direction, there's still our decisions that we make all day and into a new passage. Knowing and understanding- the control of the mise en place is the first step.

Even when the funds, and the time runs out.

Such transactions, that are not commodified, are intrinsic.

What are we to do when our attention and time are not commodified?

~Couch Gregor

Kill you darlings/Abandoning them

Will be leaving sh***** as things happen, it's product of audience ain't worth it, even the most cynical of advertisers who wanted to increase their range of influence and brand image. Along with sales numbers.

Not connecting with that medium of info, and into another is part of the salesman trade, along with it taking the notes from the direct action notebook.

Commercial taking notes from the political handbook.

So that's why they abandon there darlings, with there puritan-oppourtunism spectrum being not complete, yet not fitting with the opportunism spectrum.

Microblogging was designed for cross-links anyhow, with no search engine optimisation being like a magical romantic movie.

So the internet shifts.

~Couch Gregor

Repositery Of Dynasour

Dynasour said some good stuff. Fore people who have problems or not.

Painting from reference is good advice, but great advice is painting from memory. Making your reference be from your visual memory as opposed to something you are observing. It’s not just a technique for experimental work.

>On Bad Art advice, (He must refer to the comic/animation industry, himself being a painter)

Most advice can be useful at certain stages. Most techniques can benefit at least some artists if used intelligently. But:

- using masks and fills instead of organic brush marks 

- stressing perfect "lineart" opposed to organic contour and drawing through 

-layer separations

-emphasis on efficiency turns to industry practices vs art and risk 

-are you learning the language of art or the language of entertainment

The answer in painting is never blend

have it until you are done with the painting. If you need to blend anything then do it just a little

best art advice

-Learn to fail

-value > color. Colors can be anything

-a still image can have movement. Color can move.

-style is the mistakes you leave in

-painting appearances doesn’t need anatomical construction

-painting and reality are two separate things. A painter has to keep it that way

-think of painting as capturing effects of light instead of constructing a figure or object. An image is two dimensional 

-defeat perfectionism

-limit yourself, don’t limit inspiration 

-sometimes a painting needs to sit around and get funky 

-kill your darlings

-don’t do all the work, make your viewer work some of it out 

-ambiguousness can be more effective than a narrative 

-leave process in 

-(digital) don’t zoom in. zoom out

-don’t blend. If you have to, don’t blend until the very end, and very sparingly. An image should work w/o it

👉something cool you can do to shift your drawing away from line dependency is turning the leading edge of the contour into the shadow 👈

(On commercial work/graphic design)

If you think that a lot of "large follower count nsfw artists" are talentless hacks, I hate to inform you about the art world at large. Get good at being a hack! I'm shoveling the s***!

learn to be a hack, it'll save your life!

(( Being a hack does no invalidate art ))

they need a literary editor x2?

" Oh Darth Marenghi, you're so right! " Darth Marhenghis Editor Roz, Incarcet.

No they don't, speaking as somebody in literature. Even though, gatekeeping and curating could apply here.

Some people need editors, some people don't they could be stuck within circularity and pigeonhole, yet it's a cosy pigeonhole, filled with calming clichés and stereotypes that reflect reassurances on the psych. Other than that, These hedonic treadmills can only take an amount of time required, and I would not have time for anything else.

Even when I tip my own toes into hypersexual themes, then it's going to be it's own cycle.

Yet this woosher with the times going round, when reasons of circles, then all the hackneyed reasons tend to justify itself, seeing self-justification of the history before, is a skill.

It's a wild west, so of course without guardrails there's going to be indetermination of unpredictable randomness. So, The infinite tasks here are going to be a problem.

A song that reappears from my old gaming days.

They'll never be a another kim Kardashian book deal. Next Question.

"What if people like but big boob?" - Drew Goodman

I see all the cyberspace trying to me to the next toy of a chief marketing officer, it's all happening again, the post-entertainment is happening again.

It's simply not novelisation, I'm afraid, not even formulaic novelisation.

Someday I'd rather be labelled a hack rule 34 than certain other 'professions', merely because it can be industrialised with advertising money, does not mean it should.

Infinity of the net and its anonymity, to gimmicks and the small pockets of scientism, reducing irreducible literatures and aesthetics to info.

Susan Haack (Problematic fave) Knew that a clock with all the physical machinations, and the irreducible time of it being 7:30 pm of social conventions. We are seeing a lot of scientism from the grifters of the AI movement. Resource of things to my shoved into a mechanical plant, that could be the coming account of Preposterism.

It's not the Technology, is all the social conventions and the obvious case for ethics that have been brought up.

These waves of attention will be continued to be farmed with the slop that's going to be enabled, so I guess to revitalised, let's look at the slop beforehand that did not have its hand within AI.

From 5 reasons why pop culture sucks, 10 years ago. Makes me want to neologise a fresh term, calling Deshowmantize. 

I think back to Cyberpunk Manifesto With its being to be another article with the amount of by Colin, before he left. Yes, this is another case of things that may come, at the time though, it's going to be with the idea of obliviousness of content, everything under that is being layered.

So expect Scientism to hover within the C-suite, the executives, and the technopolists/technoposopony (monopsony and technology combine to form a new word!). Tech is all but cognitive dull tools. To wrap it up, commercial publishing contracts are a lottery.

1 - 1.20 for the publishing gag. Well, They are all persuing the next K* persuing the next standard. Including her in space tourism.

Overstimulation Game Overload.

Season ending

I rarely play games. Now, yet this one had a theme that resonated.

https://neal.fun/stimulation-clicker/

Ah, the overfilling and overflow, more does not necessitate better, where does meliorism mean any more? Is it there? Is it over there? Is the ludology here? No, it's all over the place as we are made to find the centre for our creative practices that we work at.

Yet here we clamber, wanting to find the perfect mise-en-place for the mise en scène. It's right there in front of us with our work-flows. That's kind of a shifted ludology, unmeasured games if that's a new mindset.

Low processor, browser technology at our viewing is becoming the new kind of tech, I like it.

What I learned from Neil Postman that more showmanship =/= does not equal better.

Contemplating failure concepts

 Hpkomic conceptual for pinups.

Such is the intuitions not verbalised and illustrated, non-articulated intuitions are like that. James Gurney on the concept of failure has been examined

This is where vague gesturing is used in the truest sense of the term, abstract expressionism without any axiology guiding it, only directions as brute as it gets. Non-risk with failure to it. Then, I move towards

Ascribing autonomy to artifice

Back Colour getting less arbitrary

To what it means to be a poetic and a heart to a thing made within the imagination of concepts made into actuality?

What is that the ways that our fingers make something fresh, that it has eyes to be the centre of all our attempts to transcend mortality, over and above the whole waves that are the ideas that are there? Questions of the creation and craftsman who cannot handle his tool. Now that his ideas are serving.

Time is a burden, to see something that can see, feel, SERVE. Then make it together.

"Just shut up, here's a dough for the next gig, quit it with your poetry"

... Sure, I'll make him something

 ~Couch Gregor

Typological awakening, out of mimes

It still surprises me today that people don't own and label it, words mean things, and they lead into our taxonomies that are countable and then into a dialectic to our countable.

Abstraction and self-referential reexamination can matter deliberately. As Plato pointed up with the paradox of our enlightenment with his cave.

Instruction prose and poetry without the form. Has managed to hyper-focus the writing facilities to a point that's made. Out of the monkey see monkey do, from quick social media.

It's stopped to make me think like a mime. Out of such a biological taxonomy of carnality, an ideal, and principle helps to pull out a long promise. Away from the race to the bottom.

Good design does not necessitate instruction, prose or poetry, yet it does not entail it. Especially when delivered.

Assuming Direct Control: Ideoeros

With the love of fiction comes with the love of the intangible ideas. (Reading Susan Haack, Despite her critic of dialectical materialism, she's got a solid epistemological study through such academese. Academes does not translate well into social media. What it means to consciousness raise to a public audience.)

Direct control is relative to the ideological justification provided, such is the authority, authorising new cultivations. 

With no election, contest or anointment, performances lead before. It's best to be direct, to simplify. At first, for the intuitions of the public, started with publishing.

Such is our fragments made from the once deferentialism, now it's with the cynics out there who happen to respond. Out of the platforms with our ideas that our for the culture, not some kind of algorithm that seeks to do.

A way of viewing of what can be seen an erotic nature of property.

Esoteric/Exoteric

Other than the luck

Outside in inside out.

Such as the way of the esoteric discussions must be made into the communications of the outside world to an exoteric domain.

For familism to novelism, to the other way around. Even with the Egyptian specifications, who remade their crafts toward the avant gardes. Out of sociological reasons, there it is again, we are going round to a status play. To our governance.

I keep moving through this conceptual distinction, from that to the last. Discovered and made into better specifications, or not scaled for intentional craft.

Autonomous art

Theodore Adorno, the indirect confrontation. I'll adore.

No point writing to hustlers who don't read, or who can't label or own their slog. No purpose to feed data and not itself, where's the sincerity of it? The short term wants of the audience cannot be made, is there balance? Should there be one?

The claim that it can completely independent is itself a political statement, the avant-garde defence. These are apologetics with their own character.

It's all about for vendors who don't want to listen, or do a rote mechanism towards a reductionist idea of transaction. All to the idea of being irresponsible to job specification. If only they were only more direct with their hustle.

Well, that's what it takes, with such as confrontation, even interpretation.

Which is why the prosumer itself feels like the most condescending, degrading to the craft of art to hackneyed product. So the paradox comes to move upwards again. The prosumer has a memory of a goldfish.

Commited art

I cannot separate art from artist, as with commitments, everybody's got a pontification of it. I'll say it's certain vendors' neutrality.

Fiction ain't directly political. The truth holds in the indirection.

Essays, editorials are. With no artifice. Direct confrontations can overlap, not drive the theme within the fiction.

They are always there, those who pontificate avoiding dramatizing/controversy is itself an dramatisation. Accepting a cold defeatism of entertainment that could be the lay like that. Or, beyond the amusement, there's the artifice, along with action.

That is, what commitment ought to show. With no apology. To the audience with tension. To that insufficient bread and circus. The mysticism that self-contradicts.

I semi-agree with Bertolt Brecht about political illiterates, by the way, the only problem with that is that they deliberately don't read, which is counter to it all.