Unworth

Critical ignoring and certain concepts may not have been important for a book reader who's happened to keep his social media intake low. A qualitative opportunity for banality or a canvas of expression.

Or so that's how it's supposed to go. With the prepositional manners and attitude of.

The image of the thing, the spectacle of the thing, within the manner comes from the in-sync and sync states. Scheduled and paying attention to what's in and out.

Oh, an A-axiology feels tautological.

on the lindy effect

The Lindy Law

Reading self-help advice of crafting crafter for craft. The way of the meta of meta. Self-referential.

WITH NO OWNERSHIP Welcome to the creative commons. Are you surprised?

So much intake of consumption of content with the way it's like it's got that way. Industry complex of condescension on the front page, or am I looking at the mindless entertainment in infront of the front page?

This is the best the place has to offer.

Then you have to protect your attention.

Then with manners it goes. To look in the other places.

Catechisms not contingent on

With talks going on and on, exchanges like that.

I wonder how many read and take literature and the formation of themselves and news through the oracles of experts. Then that way, through there insights, it will lead to a new turn of know-how, to being in the know.

The produce with the service to advertising.

With no contingencies, there is no need for any attempt of casualness; they all go and vanish away from the disposable chatrooms.

That 1%, out of a direct response. Could be oblivious, and that's okay.

Even the lonely ones leave on the Substack. Unable to sell a copy, the attention drought is with us. Either stuck in short-form video trying to get engagement.

Comparing it to a hamster wheel. Generating and accumulating raw datum of the insights landing randomly on.

On Art & Fear 1000 pots

The little data coarsened with the data made. Then it pops out.

What does it mean within AI? The interactions? The ideas? The way things and virality happen on the internet, what does 'better' mean? What does meliorism matter now? 

That's the idea: the one who produced 1000 pots other than one perfect pot was better, apparently. That was the study. It could have reflected on the method or the means to produce more content or the means of production of perfection to make a single piece worse.

Yet with all these word comparatives, is it so that to judge a ship of Theseus, it's remade into that new non-value? So it's made into another status object that will lead into another state of being for another?

Regardless. All iterations, though, are made in that manner;
that's been another one.

Ain't pleasent enough

All those minor iterations and alterations, of somewhat could be considered.

Little bit here, no, remove one here.

Move and make it to the end.

Not the end, and all the way it's like that.

No,

Yeah,

The ideas work here.

Then what's visualised, then what's here.

The work or hobby craft

little bit of hands

Little left

done


( wow, Seth is still rambling, Why am I still fumbling.)

Honest hacks vs depressed hacks

Depending on the socialised means of production. The artisan city/suburban dweller class.

It's work of art/entertainment paradox working here.

I'm going to twist this post by Seth and Harlan Ellison it up.

There are the vendors who will listen. Hits, specs. These are easy-to-work-with entertainers. Able to connect with.

Then there's the depressed one who hits the spec, yet feels rote. These could be talents. 

I mean, that's the difference; the artisan is a creative with tension in the craft.

The craft itself of the depressed feels rote and standardised. These could be tantrums as performances.

An honest hack entertainer delivers on times, understands specifications, yet can go beyond the mechanical performances of eliminative materialism and then attempt an organsim to delight with something remarkable with the client relationship,

fatalism destiny of elitism

These anti-realist, anti-representation attempts.

That Orson Welles turned his nose up at those snooty naught experts while teasing his audience with his wife in such an anti-plot way. Creatives in the field are faces with an academic system that has failed to overcome the gatekeepers.

So, left to fend for themselves or get lucky, as they say.

With what attempts to hold together, even with a pirate/anarchism, there are attempts to hold a leadership, or they call it Hydra leadership. Yet to be proven.

Can there be fatalism to consumerism and business transactionalism? Of middle class transactions, there are other business models. Cost of living and such. Or the owning-class property relations or the working class relations in; tension as the divide is made.

To pick which fates and destinies is all part of the commitment.

Oh, I'm thinking about this Marxist sociologist, Nicolas D Villarreal using the labor theory of value. of the beep_boop solutions.

On vulgar Auteurism, Vulgar style/genre

Kyle Kallgren likes to be the critic of literary auteurs. Or the art director/producer running the show and their vision.

Yes, even with style, even with genre, one can still be bad.

Axiology does not care about the legalese pf
the front cover, the performance the the resonance which follows after, beyond the natural law.

So that from court of law to public. It remains the distinction of low and high still. It can be suspended to serve plenty of stimulation.

Or YOU TEARING ME APART!! LISA WITH SYMBOLIC JUSTICE

video 🔻🛋 on the best/worst over-distributed vanity film. In the spirit of Robert Mcghee. Of the spectacular production and the founderent manueavuring through the industry. Deproffesional within the social media.

(Wonder where Kyles video will be next? I don't follow him.)

Notes on oversetext design course

. The meta of social media is the limit of the craft, with people copying conventional IP to thirstrap/tail at the treat. Is that what one of the polemical essays did? Try to highlight this cargo cult. The commercial illustration mindset!

Wow, banging on the factory settings was a great banger, with its polemics of the one-dimensional man of the standardisation of our consciousness.

The tyranny of the firm is one that's to be solved through other essays which deal with contract law and freelancers alongside that with the chokepoint of vertically integrated media.

The Nature of the Firm by RH.Course

Freelancers founded into a new venture should act more like enterprising firms; who'd have thun
k it.

The video explaining modernism and its polemical connotations was spot on.

Wonder what oversetect will be after I Post this? Regardless, I'll thank him for the list.

A deliberate, non-serious response : Conservative art essay, and my aesthetic direction

(Is this complimentary doodle, Idk)

 This one, one with the funded kickstarter, apparently. I'll keep it low profile, I've already dived in to anti-positions such as porn, and now it's a conservative one (Intelligent at least.)

Made a good argument for consciousness.

• Hays code realism is on point. Best part.
  
  
  (They're still posts about this)
• Transgressive realism and dysthrophic realism are both confused, maybe he's being cynical with how everthing ia co-opted by reactionary capital? Doug Ruskoff the Merchants of cool documentary covered this phenomenon with mtv, test audiences and mtv. This is merely central institutions trying to resonate, you still have your romantic realism on a indie level.
• Is he nostaliging of the home of Classical realism

More of the American Jingo realism of GURNS.

• Who claims the aesthetic of this category of romantic realism? I'm more a gothic in the aesthetic realm, yet here's to a category exclusive to partisanship. Decide their entitlement to dictate women's bodies, its always weird, they are reminded they are not in control. Self-flagellation, and simply not that note-worthy, considering the Stellers blade and other designs not convening to that nuclear family expectation.

(That lara croft is unflattering comparison btw)

Pretty commissions and at least superhero stuff happening, I can see.

Peter Coffin went that these continuing qualia of interpretation of ideas, With these commodified into conventions of the trad-wife/stepford wive type of deal, at least that former Randian is trying his best to crawl by refuting romantic realism, I never had to entertain it.
How are labour is made to follow along the conditions of rule, into a commodified community to then circulate new aesthetics like this one.

Now for my own which I'll coin in aesthetical tastes. Here's my own taste.

Foundherent Realism or Gothic
Crosswordism

A combination of pragma and dogma, to bring forwards a manner which drive dialectical realism which is to pursuit of knowledge (Epistme) and the holism of the techne of art in its edges of mysticism. There are the ways that is can bring with a physical foundation, and the emergent culture of our arts, aligning with our conventions of hacksmanship, entertaining illusions of spectacle. Both dancing concepts. It can both handle abstraction and representation.

or so, with the industry of it's essence (The show must go on) Of Life's fulfilment and it's deaths decay. Embracing both of dialectic of structure and superstructure to help build a knowledge and culture worth fighting for. Or so that's strength, ( Provided with a Eric Helms autoregulation physical programming of the body.)

So what am I to do with the entertainment enterprise? Critique it? Endorse it? Well, You'll get it.

Shall the area of our immaterial reflect the materials anew, and bring a shine of new pragma and dogma. I wish it well. As originate from a classical past and reunify it from it's iconoclastic trappings. (That's from Schott Mclout

From the sublimely mawkish, compared to it's abject horrors. For they bring into our own urban fantasy they reflect our areas.

We where all sloppers in the prosumer, primordial soup. (Except for the Harry Potter bit.)

Have a sofa seat from my ref folder. A non sequitor.

https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/in-defense-of-slop

 Thing about a slop, its made us more mindful with our consumption, Our intakes and our Imputs, when we don't swing down the entire Burn-the-internet-memes-on-behalf-of-disneys-drm-repulsive-practices. It's made me think of pleasure, about shock value, about attention. In 1970s and it's a slow, absent doomerism that's only made me want to do something more.

Avoid mediocrity, and mediocre of the averages, with independence of vision. ( Wow, James Gurney, if that's a thing, Commodity fetishism'n all, it's banal now, so now what I'm going to do?)

That's the problem with slop, it's anti-positivist definition, not a metric. Going to like another bara pin-up now at my microblogging feed.

Well, there's an article that's made me think, including Andy Masleys

With all the slop, SEO and all the stuff, the principles of distribution remain the same.

Oh, they're trying to inspiration porn JK Rowling again, I'll post this Verily one

*Prosumerist, it's naturally, physically impossible to disassociate from consumerism. Only get post-scarcity.

at the end of 13:00

Why i may not be a comic artist.

Contemplation, I'll continue zining. Yet a need the negative space to propel forward.

• Low pay: Lack of wages since it's one of the passions that can't be fuelled and be profitable, that's a reality with most creative industries. Or, oxymoronically, it's due to creativity might not pay off, an indertinimate amount of trying to make something new.
• Abusive Supervisors with awful labour management practices/ No labour protections: This comes from expierence, I brushed with them twice , Well, with graphic design/illustrator jobs.
  I learned more from Eric Helms bodybuilding pyramid and then that. Realistic, enjoyable, and flexible.
• Hustle Mindset: Level up! Power scaling! Amelioration for the sake of it, when all the labour puts down with the distribution being sent online for a microblogging platform that only expects pornographic performances, or something to that of copywriting. A mental model that's never good enough with the metric that can harbour averages.
  
  There's a ladder, and there's a bridge to sell you, so many with the how-to-industry complex.
  
  
• Art is mere copyrighting commodification: Well, You know if you know. At least I know I'm a hackneyed entertainer for transparency of my aesthetics with what I show, like a magician's illusion, because I find it fun to hold attention. They do have a vanity with the delusions of grandeur. Especially with the industry of publishers of copyrighting for them with PR. Lack of self-respect with the field of not protecting there labour.

That's water is wet moment. Yet I do it anyway.

 Other than that, the vision of making a storyboard to life continues.

I dive in the black culture, Josh Johnstone and FD Signifier.

In the words of Josh Johnson "Art can save your life. But entertainment will never be your salvation." Sinners, I see.

Still following F.D Signifier, his one on Charlie Kirk had quite the intro. So this is the video where he goes into the Hollywood and vertical integrated media does to independent creatives. Oh the hacknification of it all. So that's being the welcome to the machine all over again.

I don't know if I'm an ally or not, I'll leave that to the black communities
to decide.

I'm in the autistic beep boop culture, learning disability. Along with trying to sort that mess, that's where I'm positioned amongst the community map.

F.d Signifiers makes culture preserving, even with that wrong ai water take he did. Even if he goes deep into the silly ends of hating the prosumer spectacle, which i seem to ignore, which others have taken a anti-vax like conspiracy mindset too. I'm hiding with the catgirl open sourcers till a lot of the smoke passes through.

Paul Klee

Those were by another hand. The last two. Anonymous of outsider art.

Materialist semiotics

Nice outsider art.

The beauty of our incoherence

Down to our linguistic beginnings.

Sememe, introduces new concepts that those most reductive concept of meaning. Along with its structuralism into a mindset of a wholistic splendour that I'm happy to delve in. Hopping from Lenin and Althusser and all those from the past of Marxist Leninism, it's certainly a dive into what it means to knowledge in post-llm era.

Such is today, as I've remained my sanity with Susan Haacks Foundherent Positivism/antipostivism synthesis, along with the criteria of the analogy of the crossword of figuring out a play of words to fit in within interpellated spaces, signifying meaning with the ways the lead into a holistic picture. So this book aligns with its knowledge, with the attempts to help bring a structuralist take on this new turn of events.

Casting down the singularity, while also brushing side the misrablism I see on microblogs.

Or, that's how it's seen, or what helped my soundness of mind with the LLM/diffusion provocateur wars between Musk/Sam Altman, with the forbidden fruit knowing a new framework that rejects of fundamental radicals (Except for the licensing ones) No fixedness with the sign and signifier, providing the structure of understanding an interpretation that fills the bowls.

So yeah, I did enjoy it, even at the little memoir at the end. There's little gems on the long tail of distribution like this. Do recommend.

Doing something you don't care about ; a good doomerist post

What happens when you commodify?

All merely at the breaking points rule of law?

Just do rule 34 art and tail popular entertainment campaigns?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just make sfw cutesy relatable comics while having no editorial work

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just do stuff at Buzzfeed with listicles and other things?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just just just.

I do respect this doomerist substack article.

The lonesome death of the last copywriter

"I’ve had a growing frustration with the way AI skeptics, especially my comrades on the left, dismiss the likelihood of mass AI job replacement by pointing to quality problems that are both easily and affordably fixed.

Most creative jobs in the US aren’t making art that people care about. They’re making corporate slop that everyone hates, but which is necessary for doing business. The only people who will miss the human slop when it gets replaced with AI are the humans who used to get paid to make it."

Aaah, respect. Well, If it happens or not, have a look.


Listening to te the one and only Garth Marenghi's Bursted Earth. Or I could listen to Snoop Dog's voice read voices to me on Speechify. Which is more mediocre. Seth said it best with his own doomerism, anybody hustler stuff that he can use Stable Diffusion that's pretty alright, or the one and only illustrators he alludes to.

Or that, not rehortically, more convincingly. So that's his commodity fetishism and prestige. Magic and mysticism that can't be judges from the algorithm mindless data-landscape.

George Bridgemans teleological

 From Aristotle and Hegel.

George Bridgman tried to teach a way of rymth to his students.

Purpose, destiny, and fate. Since I follow a sociological doctrine, involving constructions and instructions of function.

The internal purpose, or the motive they say within a presumption apprach was one of the ways George Bridgman taught.

Yet it's all writing lesson, all the experiences now that I follow a clearer approach with those who are methodological. Such a path that means that will one will flourish into new avenues. Thanks, to a new page.

Avoid digging those presupposition holes

 Be careful who you work for, that's what you give labour too. Or, the moral desert

Be careful who you believe as a means of coherence, that's what a presupposition is.

An opinion of prescriptive judgment, of all prescriptions and then the descriptive.

Intellectualism, well, it's a stuff you ask a scholar for. Seth Godins Liberal ramblings.

Fair Use advocates

Interpretability the first one next-

Since copyright is a state sanctioned monopoly. Non-binding and unenforced. Freelance contract workers and the useful fiction of firms. It's not a platonic natural law.

Fair use advocates are appearing out of the seams. I can only sympathise due to the misinformation of micro bloggers.

The technical term is infringement, not plagiarism, and it ain't a felony. More an embarrassment.

Propriety drm won't solve this. This lawyer questioned the nofakes act, I agree. Thankfully it's not in effect.

"Why you should be worried about the NO FAKES Act:

-Threatens free expression and fair use

-Expands copyright law with broad language and vague definitions

-Harms open-source AI and tech innovation

-Would impact transformative works like fan and remix culture"

https://ccianet.org/articles/the-real-costs-of-the-no-fakes-act/

Welp, wish it the best. The lawyer is getting annoyed with the concept of 'market dilation' I'd say due to long tail there'd be diffuse, and I'm looking into automation from other sources other than the old doctrine of dialectical materialism.

Creative service

Creative service Gabe? Well, I have my thoughts.

Venn diagram of industrial and artisanal modes of production! Marxist doctrine, a go-go.

Industry its stuff of labour and professionalism, and the firms. Right to the artisanal.

Marx, Keysein and the Marginal Austrian one with theory of economic value, scarcity to make a product.

Artist implies creativity of an individual, not a collective (Even if they have style guides and a place and trace.) Thats the industry of arc! Taylorism and Fordism combined to make it with scientific management.

So, The mode of production is required to ascend from hackneyed to creative. Select the factory, select the future.

Industrial hacksmenship, or marginal cost and value vis the artisnship of labour value. (That's the doctrine of Marxism for ya)

Graphic design and Illustrator, industrial, Contemporary art not so much.

There it is again, Commercial and Literary distinction again.

Nioce and calm. The Curse of knowledge. Still into Tech Journalism.

 My intellectualisms here and the curse of knowledge. It's either use or be used
 
Tech means art and the study, and that's what it means, it's dialectical with the audience and with all the means today, so here's a beat.

Blender is still cool, like these demos. Even the youngmetameta with those classy pin-ups.as

Awwwwrrr such topology, re-topology, and form. along with the flex.

Impressive! Hands! Hands, gotta love dem expressive hands.

Sweet add-ons for the blender head. Kitbashing 

I still remain a tech enthusiast here, oopit.