survivorship bias

 Overlooking the fact there are so many, from the ad creep, the ad creeping horizon of expectations. With the crawling sigma grind set and the crunch culture. That happens to be the case of the odds one out with courses.

Swimmers body all over again, instant results, before and afters, edits, get the she-bang in the flash, transform in the snap of the fingers.

Yep, too good to be true 
Survivorship bias, like fallacies, are informal fallacies which can't be quantified and need credibility to back it up. I'm going through my own experience with this.

Should include western ballet thing, yet that's my campism and politics talking. Still reassessing my own positioning on that matter, and will have to come back to you with another editorial.

Never good enough for industry and us

Since i had to check out thought slime some more, here's my fave. Second to the hard work and Garry Vee.

Myself resonating with the anarchist critique of hard work and art commodification, being defined by price. Brings back to the image of imperfection that's back to wabi-sabi. Bad art, slop, it comes for all our lives, since it ain't an exact qualifier, it can't be made.

By good enough, that means the objective infinite money, apparently.

Wrong about work hour estimates

I'm being overly meticulous for a point, to the point of calorie tracker.
 

Bearnards boop animation

Current day on Thursday, last day of July. Unreliable work tracker got from this post, with thoughts.

Two fat Monstys -8hrs from idea board 5hrs?

Scar's portrait

-8 hr 31 on pinups of Jon On Plaza.

Double spread's within adult works Frog F'd minus the 33 h

Cover

End cover pinup. These are moments I have done after my workout schedule 5/2 week. Apparently. Even if I cut back on volume.

The lord's ram splash pages.

My blog pages (some of them lost as I deleted the doodles as I was done) Total collective time.

Look it that, my vertical blog doodles are even more inconsistent.

Another with my pinups. Last time it was five hours, it was typing up in m blog.

Sometimes I type in my phone, I read while walking, does that count? Reading for pleasure, reading for essays to learn a thing or two, 

ugh, felt most tired with this one


This was all the industrial tradition of scientific management by Taylor.  Yet I cannot determine or take it seriously, there's only a long succession of mise-en-place and the little.

Then the physical coaches like Eric helms with auto-regulation, fatigue management and deloading with workload sensitivity. That's not even touching on the work, and it's ontological characteristics that It could be questioned. Anti-work and the Burnout society with the virtue of uselessness.

Yet ho ho, all these work hours. They're all so arbitrary.

It's going to take a lot of unionizing and atomisation that will take on the industrial burnout machine, that's already displaced us.

Oh, and remember Ashton Hall's morning routine, there's this thing that it was pure advertising, and it's race to the bottom because it's become a commodity now.

Bragging on social media labour power has become advertisement now, and the cobra effect of that has seeped into it. They

I'll put a gag routine here.

Even with the work hour laws and such. They are not reflected with the advertisement for these kinds of motivational TikToks. Unethical advertisements driven by response rates and audience capture.

This applied latterly with my programming of artwork has been better, so I'll share it.

Unpretentious/pretentious

 An unpretentious deal of quantifiable polls and, shocks, the market share and its predictions

I reflect back to the irreducible, and incommunicable, of the priceless artifices.

A pretentious art piece or literature that beckons more. Unpredictable quagmire of narrative logical direction.

Oh, what a distinction.

Despite the anti-plot smut I see on my feed. It's alright.

Artes mechanicae

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artes_mechanicae

With the medevil of the hackneyed methods of servicing informal groups, this of a circular pattern regarding our desires in contrast with another. That's a matter of where the swings of digital society go.

There it happens, one tip and tack and formulations and depictions collide, then cease to be.

Mechanical acting and mechanical mediocrity that happens to us till community, from outsider imaginations and then into new sectors of the net. Not contingent on the industry structuralisations and then into a new modern era of society construction.

Brick by brick, together, upwards.

Such as with predetermined mechanizations, the arbitrary wills of wild justices. That the veil of blind romanticism of that of our modern society is to be peeked.

the is-ought gap of making/publishing frequencys

 Welcome to the machine part two. Of our dysfunctional business models. Of marketability, marketability, of marketisation and unmarketerisation. Such is our commercial or uncommercial strategy.

Oh, I was thinking about frequency, I will put Jay Levinson quote in my writing. Oh, that's trust

Well, that's the amount of way can teach that advertising was a "tax on an unremarkable product" being false, ( I'm misquoting here) Yet, nobody's consistent, at least with people buying advertisements, they aren't going to go away.

I know there's something remarkable with the Kim Kardashian book deals, including the deal with Ninja, cui bono (Who benefits) can be an obvious question here, especially with commercial publishers.

Oh the is-ought between David Hume's is a remix/metaphor of making and publishing, especially digital publishing/traditional publishing. Something ain't translatable with there's a jump.

10 min

Had to think, this does not apply to hobbyists.

I know I shouldn't be reading advice in YouTube comments, yet this one applies
"@Solastiel1 day ago
A well-intentioned version of this advice would be akin to, "don't even think about marketing until the manuscript is finished, then you can worry about appealing to your demographic." The idea that good books possess some innate power to find the right audience by virtue of quality alone is complete Prosperity Gospel nonsense."

ismism ologyology

It is time to recursive logic and ideology itself.

Why, it's a means to look inwards ourselves and into our on untestable logics and maths, not necessarily contingent on our empirical, noumenally existing with such a matter of idea.

Things that are stuck within the headcase until they come out. Into a tunnel of infinite regress.

That's the common objection of fundamentalism as an epistemological justification, since of the continuous bases that follow afterwards. That knowledge crossword ain't existent within foundherntism so it moves into a huge tower of turtles.

S***s AI Udemy Review, and other clarifications

(I'll never sketch myself as the nostalgia critic again, and it's not even a coherent expression because it's old stuff, yet.)

Time to describe a bad decision. Following from Seth's Claude Dog Post , I've deliberately postponed this review.

Short version: I've tried my best to not make this an entertainment spectacle by making it into a format video with bells and whistles. Course I took is off-the-mark, and I don't recommend, I then think more about Licence quoting a Cryptography guy and calling it. Due to the illiteracy of licensing, I had to rewrite my TOS.

Longer version

I bought a course by Seth. I'm not convinced with my wabi-sabi tendencies.
I buy it so you don't have to! I'm going through my disagreements and snorting book reviews. Maybe out of parasocial relationship, I've decided to buy his silly course on AI.

Welp, Here are 35 pounds discounted. I could not resist. Most interesting was building a career without AI. Comparing it with the weather and the species like Kevin Kelly. Yet here we go with a another movement I cannot predict.

Then I was recommended of Midjourney and Claude from Seth, and to put it on Youtube, youch. I haven't been into perplexity as it was.

With the ideas here, I'm certain that he's going somewhere here with a workable plan. He had going with something with productivity and value and why others must go and be impresario. A leader and not a follower (ain't that what entrepreneurs do?) Yet, urgh. It's still 85 quid now of this writing.

Axiological arguments of value creation do not apply to a Taylorist Industrialist, by the way, I think he notes that himself, yet that means that with are own urbanism that we are inter-meshed now it's a subject to be explored. That he did within his song of sigificance, 

He then goes into tasks and projects, within how that such a thing will be driven my freelancer cobbler automation and that clients concerned about productivity by the industrialist would as Henry Ford, those are thoughts are another time.

He claims lawyers certain professions aren't gone out of in five years real estate broker, truck driver, a pharmacist, a daycare worker is inconceivably not going to be replaced.

So now I cover with better uses of what techno-domnion and techno-affliation with such a mindless thing, he draws on deterministic free will and Daniel Dennet's Intentional stance. Oh, He also makes a claim that people don't go to Hackneyed Movies from Hollywood any more, I get not courting their opinion. Yet, Disney get's traction.

What can happen with this though is Seth's attraction with determinism as a position compared to Dennet's Compatiblism in regard to interpreting free will when it comes to comparing this tech with autonomy.

I ended up writing the review. (It's going to be licence ramblings from now on. Already done it.

"As a wabisabi illustrator, Independent. The implications of using AI have reached wildfire within anti-ai, I hope copyright cases get turned down because being into creative commons licensing, attempting to out-license it ain't going to work. It's nice to see somebody try to cool the flames down.

It's inevitable that in our times, though, I guess illustrators are either going to embrace or walk the opposite direction.  Impresarios such as us.

I mean, What will happen with disconnection of this day and age. I do hope that there going to be more essays that don't muddy the waters.

Brings me back to Niel Postman's Technopoly, that's such a thing. What the implications with our own designs such as it will pursue the conflicts here. You're thoughts on Henry Ford are poignant.

Thanks."

Got my Certificate, eh, yeah. There's that credentialism that's apparently I have to show now. Ugh, Udemy.

Am I supposed to be proud?

Further notes.

Technopoly out of all the technological books, this felt the most relevant to what's happening today. Even with the last two. This was, despite the disagreement western bias of Cold War terms, eeriey similar to Alex Avile reported on within the second video.

Well, thanks, I guess. I don't think AI-philes will get much, AIphobes will get average with the end with Seth's plan for those who plan to not build their business with it average, cannot fully recommend. He does summarise his ideas in his next post, hmm.

Hmm. Time to revise positions again. Judging from my previous notes.

Considering Steve Klabnick has a similar to mine, with being wary'n technological puritan. Not a Tech opportunist. I'm simply not the industrial bottom line, not Disney, not Nintendo, not King who managed to lay off its employees.

Oh, It's still generative Ai, well that could be a marketing term right now. Now for the last notes.

. Jumping in bed with For-profit companies for content ID is not going to work, a nightmare system as it is. I'd wish they call it copyright infringement, but everything is loaded with RFAA terminology. It is even argued that it ain't the case, the push to make fair use and fair dealings obsolete to apparently control the diffusion models and LLMs. Trying to marketize style will only consolidate power.

Again, licensing tends to encourage monetize/marketerize-or-die kind of logic, which I'm trying to avoid.

. Environment is a loaded gun, none of the essayists or pundits than Alex Avile, fight me on that one. I'd have to limit my micro-blogging after this. Bluesky and Xshwitter aren't going to be deliberately misinformed licensing.

. Education and connections with controlling tech have been noted with Peter Thiel. Along with certain reaction streamers championing it (not all). They should not be taken seriously anyway, anybody who takes thou opportunist ambulance chasers are confirming Neil postman has said about Amusing ourselves to death.

12 minute video, apart from the thing, this is going to move towards a hyperreality. How it is malicious theory to control with aimless categorization and normalisation as the maths cannot be determined by those who preprogram it. I mean Alex Avile has already touched on educational programs who happen to use with the Khan Academy.

This is a question for future generations, and the ones that will come afterwords.

Merely shows how what's at stake here.

Maybe I'm drawing a close parallel to the postmodern villain that Video's Team wrote. Copyright will end with Disney wanting to license our thoughts.

Lets hope for copyright-gate by the sovereign citizen types

(Futurama with that the ad-creep on dreams)

I'm agreement back to Flippo

"Unpopular opinion: the pro-copyright anti-information freedom response to generative AI is reactionary, and it’s bad in all the usual ways reactionary things are bad.
The tech is here to stay. The only thing being decided as a matter of IP law is whether open models will be a thing, or if the big rights holders will get to make a lot of money by licensing proprietary models. As before, I prefer a world where information and tech are free and accessible.
Like, I understand "I don't want to be put out of a job" but I really don't get "I want the tool that puts me out of a job to cost $159.99/mo from Adobe who licenses it from Getty, so I can rest easy knowing it was not trained on anything I made". IP law can deliver the latter, not the former.
Right on cue. Perfectly legal licensed training data. For OpenAI, Midjourney, and Google. Not for open source models folks can hack on and run locally. (If the copyright maximalist doctrine prevails.) All the downside, none of the upside. Yay for copyright!"
He points to this link https://www.404media.co/tumblr-and-wordpress-to-sell-users-data-to-train-ai-tools/

So I pour it, the course and the discourse. I'll leave looking at the AI entertainment channels next time.

Powerleveling/progressive Overloading I rejective!

Bading! As the table gets bells and whistles up the wazoo! Couch Gregor squeals in delight of his improved drawing tablet! "I could use some oc-drawings right now" says the art fighter. He gasps happily. "Wow! OC DRAWINGS FOR EVERYONE ! HAW HAW HAW" People of swarmed in OC drawings, physically they drown, digitally the entire servers at art fight erupt in flames then explode. Then, silence, then, sadness, Couch Gregor looks outside in shame as a LVL 90992093090290232 scribblers, then fade into black."

LEVEL UP! GET TO THE NEXT LEVEL get a million squillion with a level higher than the last importance!

Miles of crouton, this is for Physical overload, what about ideological overload? Or Cognative overload? Metabolic adaption? nah.

The metaphor of power scaling and progressive overload on distribution here is meant to induce direct response, iteratively and recursively forever and forever, of free freelance work on platforms prospecting to commodify attention for the interruption advertising. Ludology, well this is scarcity, choices and a system of affiliation and domination.

Basically, I described Social Media perpetual engagement model with how they serve interruption advertisers, as with subscriptions.

Atrophy from hackneyed recursions, stimulation of the novel, All the cognitive speeds and physical movement of my processes are an exploration, not the end result of a perfectionism of performance that the entertainment.

Oh, how wish it. Only a means of metamorphism and the ship of theses do I change. It's a licensing strategy, a copywriting means. Or we machine? Are we meant to do a performance report for assembly lines?

Oh status, levelling up, levelling down. It's all there to interrupt via the advertiser platform, zoom!

That's a pattern of thought to tingle with!! 🛋✨✨✨

Fanart, derivative grey zone. License reductionism Talk.

 No, we are below notice. As with the Seuss case.

I did Aggron within a neato butt.

This is why I'm https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ including my blog, including my ideas. Disney and Nintendo are too litigious. With there flexible permissions and the remixes of fan art of prospered. 

I'm reminded that our licensing laws, as there fullest are full of controversy and disagreements, here's one I agree with Jimmy. Copyright, an obsolete concept, or something that may be undone by capital.

Oh my, the entire copywriting profession, being completely hackneyed, each is a vote for copyright, or a vote for the legitimising of such a system.

One of the reasons why I self-publish.

I'll continue. What I've learned from licensing that people, like libertarians, have a market fundamentalism view of that only artistic energy can be placed within the desire of making money, oh how easily measures yet naive. Also, that's not art. Not even the conversion rate an executive makes, well, that of the work's exchange value is reductive in of itself.

Work schedules, crunch culture, sigma grind set, Criminalisation/decriminalisation of sex work/anti-work, sexcess, design theories and praxis, those are all the things a craftsman can discuss that don't need licence. Pro-bono and other charity projects are always there that can be done without permission.

Including the ontology of licence. Along with the witherist position. The licensing industry complex, yeash. Sustainability being a trained skill again.

( Oh btw, since capital is going to disintegrate licences due to jingling keys with it's David Foster wallace Infinite Jest that can be played on doomscroll is qualitatively different from establishing a community that prioritize mutualism and equitable, resource redistribution of the co-operatives will always be more beneficial. No from the reactionary populism this big companies have. )

Here's a 15 video by Shiddy kickflips with cussing, I need to document it here in case you missed it.

Next time! Couch Gregor will look within Comfy UI, the stuff coco was made from. 🛋🔎

Artfight platform Ruminations to license reductionism

Previously, Zei has retreated from art fight due to restrictions and, copyright apparently, or repetitive usage within boss fights. He had to remove it due to stresses now.

Oh, silly platforms, middlemen and the rent-seekers. Is this the case? What is this, is this the amount of ways that are made and that it's exposure again.

Exposure builds credibility (be it commercially), right? Or that's how it works through the public. This is the age within the Internet where there's infinity and free, what is there to license any more? Should we license? Paywall? Rhetorically, I answer here.

This was designed for one on one communications or small, viable audiences; the internet like a place like this.

Work means showing up on demand, in others terms and hitting specifications, a hobby is something one does to entertain oneself, like the YouTube poops. The hobby economy will still continue regardless, with new sites cropping up. Along with the shelf space like that.

Yet this is for the satisfaction of paying within one's own work forward, with minimal editing and interaction. That's supposed to be an art trade, some hours a day, drawing and done. Yet I can understand there are other commitments and bigger projects others could do.

Back to the struggle/share duality again, another choice to make. Can't argue with the free hugs guy, I'm a free hugs guy who does not give away licensed hugs.

(Going through the rationales)

It's non-profit and could be part of other education, so I'll give it that. The caterer gets front-page access, yet there's merely more braggability of doing other gift work somewhere else. Still that front-page space with a support to provide for the platform, the proprietary platform that I'm meant to entertain again.

Centre of Attention

 Tim Wu and all this way of thinking about attention and the such a way.

With our centre of attention, where it is being directed, where does it go? What will it do and what will define us. From our own ownership that's collective and personal, to our own means to stretching forth.

Julian Baggini's how to think like a philosopher. Had got me thinking that if things are analysed. His first chapter was on the matter of where the attention of distribution, which is easily measured today. Take note where the cues are coming over if certain argumentation is abstract and thought experimentation, there's a time and place for it, not here. ( I've still yet to read all his books on philsophy and paraphrase, it's my first impression. )

Well, Part of the organising strategy is to see if it could be invested or reinvested elsewhere.

Decide the centre of attention, the mise en place, decide on the future.

Public domain'n Antitrust

Not everything is public domain,

Yet these sources are. https://www.skeletoncodemachine.com/p/public-domain-art-resources

Things like this are to be preserved within intellectual property/commercial rights encroaching along the borders, things like this will be the source, every discovering, ever unfurling of words and images to be retold again for millennia of the creative fuel forever.

Being a pro-IP witherist (Withering it away once it's needed). I do not like the ad-creep that's happening towards certain sources of taking control of information, of what's going to happen. Since it pulls the leavers towards monopoly and monopsony control and abuses, it's simply all a mere cancer that's seeped it's vains.

We are not industrialists complexers, we are artists/illustrators/writers, we may as well run to the police if that's going to be the case, with alternative means of resource redistribution.

Not to make a complex of contradictions or conflicts, no, no, and no.

Antitrust legislation will tackle this also, Tim Wu covered it, in fact.

They've been tipping at this away.

Fictional Descriptionist

"I just wanted to entertain!!"

Prescribing a doorway instead of describing it and the horizon of expectations, well, with the generativity and creativity that entails.

Unless if somebody does not want to publish the idea for a single audience member, locking it in a vault never to be seen again, (that's another can of worms). It's going to have multiple interpretations of its ontology, only with the semi-autobiographical ways of looking at this, the many editorials shall we will discover the output.

So yeah, even with the prescriptions, it can be for the wrong reasons, from the worst reasons to the best.

 

15 minutes, nobody of the coming race could have predicted the pluralist descriptions that were to happen before.

Wow, have to share this.

Oh how entertainers and stuck within our societal context

Bricolage

 Improvised assemblies, such improvised straight ahead animating that is made as opposed with post-to-post.

That's another word I learned today, that it can stick or not.

What a word where the matter of our words are made to the public rhetoric, will this one stick? Including eudemonic, Bildungsroman, genre, horizon of expectations, complex, conception, edge, gothic, materialism, ideology, and empowerment/vulnerability.

Such as our words and the axiology we assign in our conversational praxis, going forward.

That's literature, though, finding beauty in words.

Mmm, words.

Even eidetic memory is a manner of brain stuff.

Anxietys and what to do.

A moment to clear confusion, can be self-contradictory, that's the point for the creative profession that's euphemistic.

• Continue mise en place and mise en scène
• Breathing exercises body below and deep breaths for a minute
• Clear distractions
• Clear sigma grind set/hustle culture and don't let it make inroads
• Walk outside, don't track weight or performance metrics (or do meticulously, know what you're signing up for in this meticulous manner, have an exit strategy.)
• Feel outside, without rain, the air and the birds chirping for an analogue moment
• Bliss time from the hero of a thousand faces, have a folder of favourite soundtracks
• Clear communication
• Work in silence like Crumb worked on genesis

Commidyfying Commodification

Copyrighting copyrighting, Self referential metamodernism into what appears to be the opposition of meaning and then towards at hyperreality where nothing can be sincerely enjoyed any more, and then it's too pure again, back and forth, back and forth.

So that's the trap, it's never-ending. It's a concept, it's not measured.

Thinking about this video

Had some disagreements with the golden mean and Peter skinner, at least what Peter Skinner was not as contentious as other works. Yet I did not know how self-referential has been used by artists when nothing else can be referenced, unless it get slapped.

So as with our texture to weave patterns that are meaning is made. With recursive recursion the perfection of advertising of attention retention provided by the advertisers being the perfection, yet circular reasoning it is that's unpersuasive.

Character arcs, Creativity

Do they matter? Change or No-Change? Positive or negative? Natural?  With or without plot resolution...

I consider the writing of HpKomic

Characters don't need to change, they do need to be interesting. I don't even have to be likeable. There can be a likeness complex. Thing from the unadulterated symbolic or the more contradictory paradoxes and oxymorons that may be noticed within our lives.

too novel to be a novelist

 One has to recognize one has to be a pioneer when they happen to get the way of making a fresh idea stand on its legs. One that's meant to be the way of the first steps that nobody will recognize something novel since they ain't familiar.

Can somebody recursively be too pioneering to be a pioneer, though? Away from all the tropes.
Monetary and professional risk, that's a zesty concoction with is.

What if it's on illegible on sticks and impossible to decipher? Then that's too novel to be a novelist.

Some conventions need to be respected.

An ode to YTPs

Please, do protect the commons for providing free entertainment for the masses, YouTube poop, becomes YouTube gold. Bored teenagers making amusement and then back again.

Such a cycle of charity of entertainment was a gift to us, and we have to make it with our own ghosts of what were discarded commodified shells, making life again.

They still exist, projects made for the self-entertainment of a bunch of random kids where the ideation of good enough if the incongruity of a certain happenstance was to happen out of the expectations of the conflict portrayed. So too, shall they hit the good zone of what it means to pursue a hobby within what it looks like a juicy remix.

A juicy remix from the commons and the into the creative well-being of our own desires. Out of such silly free-market hockey, there are things that stick along within our times that I made from abadoned commercial dreams.

So that, such deliberate ignoring, do these blossom.

Y'know what they say