On the The Eye Of the Master.

Even with the general intelligence being a category error, I'll give you that. That's a good examination of the Beep Boop using the labour theory of value that's within good faith.

We know it's eliminative all the way down with funnel metrics, and the e-begging and the coherency are brought and sought by many minds.

Yet what of the experience of Taylorism and measurement of the manner in which the mindset is employed? The meaning completely changes within the connectionism of the market, which is already a generalised construct within the internet, and which you participate in.

It's abstraction, an abstraction of our labour for all your labor-loever out there.

Well done for blowing my mind with the grissiere and abstract labour, from which we build ideas from the corpus of knowledge that we dialectically, positively and negatively construe of the dreams of the perceptron and all these mechanical terms that make your living mind think.

Yet a dialect aside, even a negative dialectic (as the Frankfurters would go) will happen to go.

Oh how our internet has made us into commodified communities as a mentally salient sorting mechanism in order not to lose ourselves from the delusion, even beyond the general intelligence as it's defined now.

It's specialized, isn't it? Apart from that disagreement, five stars.

Woke 2 ain't happening, back to traditional queer theory.

 No, I'm not part of it, outgrown my 20's now.

Yet there those eho do anti-social , elitist, or selling out of criticsl theory.

Oh, 1dime on anti-social adventurism ain't praxis. Theres alsi refutations too such as the cubs gay marches as queer theory advocates who go for there rights. Yet this is the problem of perect coherency, its always messy, sometime obscure, somtimes obvious.

Case by case.

Guess with the campism, then theres no perfect coherency, as with social media, as with the ways llms effect us.

That's what it takes to be a sociologistp

On Classifiers

I see their use is more common now.

Let the games commence for the scarcity of attention.

TO RUMMMMBLE!!

Peeps are paranoid about commodification; these are the algorithms and heuristics which linguistics has toppled too. And now they're checking through this. This has been checked adversarially, intuitively and counter-intuitively through a Socratic construction, with some autocomplete along with some other thoughts.

Pangram and others don't work. Or the self-abnegation of personal responsibility. Shall I quote?

Anyhow, here are two articles on why they are not to be trusted. Oh yeah, did I tell you the classifiers don't work in and of themselves? Well, you are the product. More on the math here.

This one below is my favourite refutation.

Wow, look at that math.

Including a linguistic lesson on negative construction.

“It's not X. It's why” is a linguistic construction, more specifically, a “contrastive negation followed by a corrective assertion.” It's part of a rich “grammatical context for negated restrictives in English.” Olli O. Silvennoinen wrote an entire doctoral dissertation of 131 pages on contrastive negation."

Other the times, I won't ad hominion him on other Then it got to these two paywalled ones from likely a LLM user.

This tech blogger knows that moral panic won't last.

"Moral panics are largely temporary. Almost everything we were sure would rot our culture, our brands, and the world around us became background noise within a generation. Calculators were going to destroy math; now a kid pulls out a phone to split a bill, and nobody bats an eye. Spell-check was a crutch that would make us all illiterate, and Wikipedia was not a real source, and typing out your essay instead of handwriting it meant you hadn’t learned a thing, and Photoshop meant you could never trust an image again, and Auto-tune was the death of music. Every one of these things caused a moral panic, with op-eds and hand wringing, and - for better, and in some cases absolutely for worse - every one of them is now so normal that the panic feels archaic."

This was the earlier with how it interconnects with the witch hunts

"No, the folks getting hurt are the writers. Not only the ones who are tarred - all of us. Every single ___-forsaken one of us. We are all made smaller by the pursuit of unproven and unprovable purity. Whether Ballard used AI or not (and she says she didn’t, and naive or not I’m inclined to throw my cynicism to the wind and just take her at face value, and you can mock me if you like), the punishment landed before any verdict was reached, because no verdict can ever be reached. Not beyond a reasonable doubt. Never beyond a reasonable doubt.

She’s not going to be the last. This whole setup, where anyone can accuse any writer of using AI based on gut feeling, and broken detection tools get treated as proof and publishers fold at the first hint of controversy because the PR cost outweighs the book’s revenue, is going to grind up a lot of people into a fleshy, bloody, bony paste. Most of them will be small-time writers, debut authors, indie-published folks without the platform or the money to fight back."

This guy a zionist? Really? Llms really are the anti-social media being a positive thing.
(Off Tangent, he does try the cult thing; that's a fandom thing.)

So, what do we do? Trust, trust that it is. (I wonder how much that paradox catches on)

Oh, Looks like I'm less offended, it's merely going to be a slap occurrence. I'm okay with it. Since the megacopyright ain't going to come as a cyber risk.

Link to to concluding article.

"If your stance is instead that AI is evil and so is looking for AI, then ultimately you’re contributing to the sloppification of the internet. You’re making it harder for people who write their own text to distinguish themselves, and providing cover for authors who are definitely not writing their own text."

The intelligentsia and academic affiliated sort attempt to know the peddlers of elsagate of old and will attempt to make it out. Yeah, I agree somewhat.

Applys to Human banality/kitsch/kruft too.

Well, Writing is thinkng, and the cat and mouse game between humanisers and classifiers, it's alignment and capabilities ALL OVER AGAIN!

Oh no winning, pangram lab as studies apparently proving it's not ablest, and the reactionary token supporters will be using to circumnavigate and there and they have labs now since it's like they got it 

So now with the benchmarks with all the tests to let it go with a back'n forth. So it's going to be Dead Audience theory and Panagorium

So what if these are put through claude and chatgpt, your here and you are reading this and now. The PMT reactionary Artisan impulse that strong??

"The history of DRM is basically an endless cycle of companies inventing increasingly sophisticated locks and then the internet shouting, “Oh! Puzzle!” and immediately cracking them open. Hitman 2 shipped with a new version of Denuvo in 2018, and pirates cracked it so quickly that the crack was available before the game was officially released. Make that make sense."

So back and forth and back and forth until the copyright maxers shut it and then back again.

Yay.

Bonus, Pleometric has watermark rot, our artifice are laid bare. Along with taking the MIT advice

In search for the iconclastic sociologist

'Speaking truth to power' With this brought to by view.

"Speaking truth to power" I knew the state ain't going to go away, individuals, institutions (firms non-profit) and government.

Anti-woke time of a limited supply, be it cognition of material resources can't at time be held, they may be shared.

Epistemic scaling does not comply to the bandwagon. Im afraid. Not all things can be funneled with the limited discovery of intelligence as "power"

This has lead into academic industrialisation and it's complex that leads into the furtherment of the publish-or-perish mindset,  To quote him. He's another former Marxist.

This was this sociologist's view, btw. Is he calling others anti-social?

Yet such a polemic of epistemology scrutiny is a thing that drives such I thing that I'm having to grapple with reading others, even with other's of ideas/concepts are being a free-for-all with the social sciences being free.

The neverending spectacle of transactionalism

This is what I talk about: when commodity relations own conscious awareness, it becomes apparent. Seth tells me to see it, and with the way to see these forces to predict with this entitlement of profit with the way communities form, also Fudge the MRA has been a dead head, yet all dead ends rest within anti-intellectualism.

Ivory tower to the Main road

Plot to spectacle since Aristotle.

Buying in or selling out
Quiet to load

Intention (noesis) to Randomness noise

Coherent to incoherent.

Serious to Play
Alienate to condescend

We live in the totality of the spectacle; there's not escaping it. Either we embrace the media of our entertainment in its many iterations of it's infinity, or we log off entirely. Or embrace with Dejourment. Of the tautology of the spectacle. It's circular reasoning, we will have to wrestly. Lean in become a generic hack, lean out become an anti-social elitist weirdo.

So thank you, industry, for making me see this.

So, with the macro, meso, and micro scales, do we deal with it? To see it. Of the Labour theory of value.

No winning with the leaning. We are overdominated by it already.

Thanks Deboard.

Macro mob rule; Random waves; The deal.

Mass media spectacle, manufactured into commodity, into commoditized community of fandoms.

Play into the commodity genre, prosumer or selling out, play out of it, elitist or antisocial.

No winning or do not play? Seek an alternative of the horned dilemma with work and sport?

Not going to wing with a algorithm, or macro waves of attentional focus that are a mixture of misinformed and misguided.

Synoptic Reading, On Tech Relations.

(Your likely can move that capitalist realism down to meh)

Wedge this between pretty alright, since it ain't related. With dirty secrets of the record business.

What did we learn? From these ideas? Of the ongoing desire to build a material basis. Of ideas/expressions and with all that of dialectical.

For another blog post. Yet the liberals are bringing a knife to a gun fight. Even though I wanna criticise the conservative response, Nick lands accelerationism.

Here's me attempt to educate myself. This is an accumulation of all the tech relations with the classes.

The ones on LLMs are Ethan Mollick and AI snake oil. Yet it has lead to the hustle culture.

(Are you a sociologist?!) Yes. Althusserian. Time to do honey instead of vinegar. Sooo, you wanna read audiobooks? 🛋️👉👈 

                                  

The first two audiobooks to intake with the Beep_Boop to intake platonically if you don't like the written word.

Ethan Mollick brings the latest news, While snake oil brings in the jagged frontier.

These are the ways of the jagged frontier, so I'll see a lot of cultural shifts and a lot of false polemics (mwurica) thanks didney, violence with boobies and moralising and high horsing and silly wonks.

These are the culture of the internet, and with big vertical integrated media sources move us. With how this internet functions for the technofeudalist we go by now.

This one's more libertarian yet can be mid with the same spirit.

This is an account of the West and its response and the lack of stigma within China and other countries. It's like these two books are for understanding LLMs.

Harlen Ellison's chapter about pay toilets is worth adding. Attention merchants is understand how much direct response has shaped our culture. With the gift of the gift economies.

He condemned certain reactionary scab union practices while working with his own mediocrity of being an entertainer, and with that he made his adieu with his own organising. While he attempted to teach others where the pride in the craft was concerned

We are on the precipice of philosophies and disagreements. So yeah, enjoy the bumpy ride of the ragged frontier of Beep_Boop.

This one points it out.

Bonus one the reading list.

On my reading list, the left is more bioessentialist; the right is of mental labour and our history. Regardless, I will challenge my ideological presumptions and see if they lead me into life-changing revelations. I don't think I'll be achronological in literary interpretation; now I don't think we ever were.

Oh here's my review of Matteo Pasquinelli's book

Wow, Abi's got African philosophy and a substack . with the rebranding, maybe it will move others away from the doomerist/miserablist

This one was on my feed too, to be decided. He may be wrong about the anthropomorphic lawsuit, though. IDK cannot entertain it now.

"Sam Altman will hate it" Says within the promotional material. With all the venture capitalists going back'n forth. It'd be 

Oh, This is the indie essay scene of materialist semoitics.

Looks like a tech preperationist (Oh well, Will be categorised regardless)

Guess I'll put that book on my wishlist.

How did we get here with this polysemic tech?

This is for my big deep dive of LLM tech essay previously.

The phyrric victory of b_Ep boop inquisitions

The Barbara Streisand effect is real. of a morally and epistemologically indefensible position of anti Manichean framing position thanks to populism

There are the silly billionaires, and then the shovel salesman shows up. Somebody hires a 'real' artist based on direct response and preponderance bandwagoning, and what if they in the backstage use it too?

This is too end's justify means, whatever means necessary to extinguish a flame that's too late. Or at least for the microblogging-minded circles.

Well, not without authoritarian preporitary drm backfiring, and with that, the ones who hate the memplex of this debate, then it happens again. Tautology, keep the tautology going. Not moving on, not getting over it.

Policing invisible lines of the idea/expression of a monist way towards a way that's become the dominant ideology to try to feed the prosumer zeitgeist.

They're doxing, well, this all seems like quite the spectacle, to find a Disney villain and then attack that. Then march on with another.

(Update, Looks like pangram is hear to stay, I'm not angry since it was bound to be inevitable, only then we could use it too if we are too curious and see if the novelty wears off, so then within in five years.)

The best refutation is this essay and the slopjacketers.

"You’re not mad at AI.
You’re mad that you’re not special.

Final thought, the robots aren’t replacing you.

No one was asking you to begin with.

AI didn’t kill art. You did—when you stopped making things and started judging everyone else who did.

You’re not being replaced.
You’re being bypassed."

I try not to give it power by paying attention.

Oh, laawrd, they're coming. Jaw Westernberg That one is paywalled

(Yet update, this detection craze is going the way of the buffalo.)

Rachel Morton calls this out. Too, even with this situation of the lucifer effect, Not all physiological theories can be made. It's called to the ideal.. the ideal of the spectacle.

Why you shoud'nt disclose your ai use. of the paradox of this will set. Pressure to keep professional secrets as AI is used via mass media like Disney and Nintendo. What about the indie author and that kind of responsibility? It's a losing battle

Greg Welfords weighs in with beep boop.

Wow, even an Anti had gotten paranoid of being accused. (That got paywalled too)

Damned if you do damned if you don't, IDC it ain't my problem. 100% ignorance with all the volume over impact of qualitiive experience.

Then some smug misanthrophy if chavenistic purity, and pop.

Even trained writers who don't use it are scared that they will be which-hunted thank replaced.

Since the AI detection complex is baseless on LLM free will with stochastic gradient descent base, this wild goose chase will certainly have to take a GTFO approach.

So now we will see more quietism, more paranoia, and now more bumfuggery with illegal doxing.

Oh wait

IS THIS AI?

no 

Peter has be recording the abuse

Cw racism and slurs)

Revolting prostitutes: a fight for sex worker rights.

Revolting Prostitutes: The Fight for Sex Workers' Rights

Pornography

There has to be an exit strategy. There has to be a way in and way out

This details the whorearchy and disempowerment sex work does, along with the illegalisation and decriminalisation that will occur.

Or prostitute solidarity, a reinterpretation of Marx ( which found prostitute has part of the bourgeoisie unit ) Yet these are the conditions that come those who are sympathetic with the Hegelian > dialect.

The ideal model of the nordic model and the practice of the Nordic/Swedish model.. Commercial sex and non-commercial sex. Clear categories, clear understanding something from a monist material ontology.

It's never gone away, Labour protections, it's always labour protections, not copyright in terms of licenses regarding managers in relation to the capitalist mode of production and then brought with the commodity relations we are all behind, still stuck, still updated, it's fun how different ideology like queer theory and sex work seem to adapt and consilance as this comes with the foundherentist endeavour.

So 5 starts, Prostituion ain't the oldest profession prussion (it's farming) enjoyed it while I was in bed.

Acid Communist has a another argument as a bonus you can read for free.

CYA if the coperate and compete

A leader will have a large structure to deal with the riffraff below. Not being able to deal with the eristics far away.

Too abstract to doodle properly

So, cover your ___ (not cussing). A flippant way of dealing with the bottom up conception.

Yet, with. Commercial firms and their claimed tyranny, who has the conditions of rule again?

These are structures, after all, benchmark here and an little ideal standsrd there of a team trying to cooperate rather than compete. Founded or unfounded.

So it is on the microscale of a freelancer.

Thinking about the all there is fallacy or micro-reductions of a industry that it can do.

Can I have some otium?

Back at it again with the classical labour theory of value

Carenedes attempting to the a typology of work, even though art cannot fall under industrialised white collar work. More like Sport and play, will be keeping track. IDK what he'll say with beep_Boop

How to Read Like a Parasite by Daniel Tutt.

Resentment and otium of the aristocratic class.

This not a dive of an aristocrat or a nilosophy (Ni as in hate)

Yet with such concepts, there's a thing with resentment and the eternal return, which are conservative concepts that have made me think of the literature that I'm trying to reconcile and understand. They may have crept up; this document attempts to rehabilitate while also being western Marxism to a modern conception with Daniel Tutt bringing in other authorities like Byung-Chul Han.

With the attempt to bring the concepts on his YouTube channel and make it a thesis of trying to exploit the little niches of his thought and cynicism that was brought with meaning of religion, morality and all that jazz of not know his attempts with his past. With me listening to the conception of animosity that is made flesh.

I don't know if any of Nietzsche or as they call him an physcopath can be attached today, yet this was insightful. 4.5 stars.