Positives of the luddites/Neil Postman

I have been uncharitable to the historiography of the Luddites, especially, but I want to know what lessons we can draw from history. There is, however, a polysemy and ambiguity in historiography that we are going to have to grapple with for the rest of our lives.

1. Job guarantee

2. Labour protections

3. Labour law

4. Work tax

They should have thought of that instead of a slave-driver morality, I guess such as the Protestant work ethic. Along with abolishing copyright law.

Neil Postman taught me of the dangers of an entertainment monopoly. Along with how social media and its drawbacks affect how our audience captures jobs in the market, with how sardonic it can get, and in many ways, that of the foggishness of mob rule generally.

The Lantern Parade

Spacing out with minimal, have been browsing through Substack and I need a space from it all. I have been over-reading and over-indexing on all the things, wanting to consume all the knowledge in the world.

I'm not really sure about my social science and how much LLMs have affected the space, along with the many, many LLMs illustrations that I happen to do over there in my free educational resources and this site meant for educational purposes. 

I know I don't sound like a tech bro, but honestly, it's too basic a Marxist to believe in the capitalist concept of the bubble, and more sophisticated sociological understandings.. It's going to be our segment, and that is challenging the anci'en regime of our politics.

Now I've got a new secterianism to worry about, or ignore, yeah ignore. The one joining with the republic of imperative and protestant work ethic.

With the way social media bificurates with random passerbys, I'm going to be a really button and that this 'bubble' will go. As if that will go

But I managed to carry the lion, and that was a delight to do. I've obsessed little as now I've got too much social media on my mind.

I've got a lot of thumbnail sketches and 3 images that I've still not posted out of my schedule, Always reactive, trying to control and persuade the unpersuedable inthin the blogs back and froth.

Holding on

A 50-year copyright reduction stops the human commodity value. LLM training, fair use, and into the public domain.

Reject the ownership of anarcho-capitalism. Oxymoron. Calling llms Plagiarism machine is also an Oxymoron.

Independent artists seeking alternative means of monetization. That isn't contingent on social media attention/clout economy. Scarcity in that leads into audience capture.

Decentralization of antitrust, labor protections. America won't learn that.

Focus on human autonomy and its many iterations of many valences. Of Bounded pluralism.

Etherium and Tez are proof of stake and do not hurt the environment, and can be done in hypebeast rugpull manner.

Honest metrology that isn't the base rate fallacy.

This is a mandate.

This will be held in 2028-9 till I think.

Missing the Kant's Misery for everyone

Seeing this repost a lot.

That's not how it works.

Since the functional mind (Global workspace theory) is meant to draw a sympathy function with that of the input-output. Then it's a of understanding.

What that Animatrix of the second renaissance was a of dignifying through the transcendental idealism (or, what they like to call, sympathy.) Then it's a matter of time.

We keep warning

They keep not listening; there will be blocking if this ever happens

Influencers are the princes of the media monopolies.

Proprietary DRM is a reactionary capital tech.

LLM/Ethereum/cryptography are anarchic tech.

2022-23, and the anarchic fireworks, and, boom. 🎆🎇🎆

What can be reclaimed?

That's the fact remaining, of the mid-wit now, and endoursed with these subtweets.

What does a meta polemist have to say

What does he say? I can't fully trust, neither. Yet lack of certainty may indicate thought.

Yet the meta-polemics of self is something I respect.

Who stands to lose?

The straight white male ego of the middle class? Well, not really identity. Interpretive supremacy of a status quo, just world within a
or
Some nothing.
or
The symbolic middle class of existential panic who serve them.

Why i don't debate simple hegelian

In an action movie the hero kills a villain.

Oh, some kind of conflict that happens all the typologies of plots are determined by some form of tension and conflict of physical and metaphysical duality. Unless if it's anti plot spectacle.

Yeah, when I set and controversy or non-happens. I'm left wondering. Is this worth fighting for polimics, determined by

The process preservation of the status quo.

Truth is some people like the hustle culture and just like the posture

And I don't have consistency, are simply don't care about consistency.

No drama at work, huh, can pay off.

Always along lineage of being studied, although we revealed, but never assume

Beyond Bwubbles, Onto new analogy

🔮🛋 In this economy? Opinion time for Couch Gregor. 

Update, there's a bubble discourse with this. As there are too many cooks. Speculative theater ahead.

To this

And Ezra Klien attempting to sort it out. 

This everything is so fast with the concept of the bubble coming in 2022, I've decided to move on with a new state of economic transformation in iterations. Something that IDK what is happening so I'll repost my thoughts. To the Ron Paulisation of everything.

• Ed zitron. Gloatmaxxing As far from the rumours that the bubbles got the pop with embarrassments, and with his news later, which I have no influence over along with no kinship. OOOPS well he's wrong thanks Ben Garrison.

• Peter Thiel and Mark Anderson and the and copyrighting have taken a different approach to the bubble, saying it's going to lead to abundance, said whole Boomer, utopia of some kind well, or something idealistic of that nature. Nah. (nope) 

• The concept artists themselves fake-believing with the copyright nuke. Think that the bubble will just automatically extinguish, including there employer Disney. Itself into a world of ultimate peace, it's still long going, it's getting more tropeish and predictable by the second, ignored in the low Tier. On that corners of the microblogs that's where it will exist.

• The YOU WILL LOOK SO INCOMPETANT WHEN IT POPS DUMMY by one of the intellectuals on substack I quoted on substack on cloaster. Nah, one poster came as supremacist. Idk something else. It felt like more a showboat rather than a manner to like it. (Post edit, he's went 180 and hates it too with the job annihilation job disappointment,)
  
  
  
  

  
  Oh yeah, the predominant 'left' also predicted that with niche
  Bitcoin, look how that turned out. I already covered it here.

The most plausible from a solitary cautious optimist, through the different variations, that there's going to be a quiet revolution of academics and other thing that is the one that feels the most plausible bubble right at this moment. Quiet with agile firms.

What if it's not a bubble yet? Other self reconstructing Bridgestone? The llm compatibilism.

One trying to reconstruct and build together once with each new filter list with each block and reconnection of construction. Blocks and discovery's from the connectionist substrate, to the reconfig an return and overlook of the relation of elite and popular, and the return to a natural duty.

When that comes, it's a matter to reunite and see which from the commodified community's that are made, it's the populist de-emergence of the matter of the integration of society.

So as a left accerationist it's going to be this meme

Back to the equilibrium, from a synthesis of many and one.

What foxkey is claiming there's an illogical bubble? Idk.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/the-all-or-nothing-vibe-shifts-of-the-ai-industry.html
Oh, blame the Hypers too. Good, bad. or not, Archive version

Conclude @pojmasta done his work,

With all of that, as a mixture of being normal and ethical with it. I'm alright.
So, even with the projections of violitality of the 

"So on the topic of Bitcoin: the CryptoTicker article treats Bitcoin’s lack of a crash alongside Chinese tech stocks as evidence of cryptocurrency’s independence from traditional markets.

But why was Bitcoin supposed to crash in the first place? China banned cryptocurrency in 2021 and reaffirmed that prohibition earlier this year. Knowing this, no one should think a speculative asset China has spent years restricting would fall alongside China, if somehow China were indeed collapsing.

It’s like saying that because RAM prices are so high, I don’t know, bananas should be expensive too.

I cannot overstate this: the stock market isn’t the economy. A stock can lose half its value without the company losing half its business (or any, theoretically speaking). The S&P can soar while everyone struggles."

Now to attempt an educated answer .Peeps need to confront that to consume such stuff.

Lookit these grafts like in freddy got fingered 🛋📊📈 So don't take me as authority.

So no, Supply and demand, get there is no better with this crude economic analyse, Here are some concepts. Yeah, it's on us, along with that. With It going in.. 2030 it looks like until it goes down?

Apperently Patrick Boyle as this graphic her, erm does this look like the Gartner Hype Cycle? Or How money works.

Ain't a authority on this, Sooo everybody on substack with all this makes it the case.

Away from Hollywood, Away from Silicon Valley. Away from the early critical theory.

Cheap goods and entertainment wins. Don't be a D__K still holds true with these systems. Complaints being that of the human conditions with Marx being a neutralists. What if we've been illusitory magic fluctuations and we the the average voter of a american democratic society are the problem?

This is not to talk about the inevitably or that, I'm a non-normative naturalist by heart, yet the viral ones within microblogs don't get it.

Question is capitalism within potential sino-opnions one may disagree with, I've been following 4dime for a while. 

(Oh a muted that name because he's a censoring prick

So I don't know as we ignore the hype.. and the stupid Manichean framing of anti-pro of false binary. The Open Source and china

Open Source Arg.Min Yeah more graphs. From modern times with China coming and bringing Beep boop.

"Because China is exporting to technically advanced, high-skill, high-wage manufacturing sectors such as automobiles, industrial machinery, chemicals, and precision tools, the second China Shock is hitting Europe harder than the US. Germany, Europe’s largest economy, is especially vulnerable. Germany bet its economy, its national identity, and its legendary social contract on dominating the market for high-end gas cars. China bet on electric vehicles built rapidly, cheaply, and at “good enough” quality. China’s bet is paying off — and the result is China Shock 2."

Oh look took a comic from an infamous cartoonists, reapproipated it what a polemic, what a time. Wow, A it does not matter if they shot themselves in the foot in 2023, they don't care. Self-flagellation. What are we going to do with all this response raites

Argh, guy you hate makes a great point.

I'm not going to hold my breath.

Source

So yeah, that's what this is we are angry at the human condition. The desire for cheaper goods and services, at ourselves. 

Appreciate metrology, (Got recommended this by a gay fox free to read, Haven't read it yet, so I'll share it here.) Regardless, it's been added to growing reading lists of limitless knowledge already.

Look up ya concepts! You sound so out of touch.

It's this all over again. Chill out.