Who stands to lose?

The straight white male ego of the middle class? Well, not really identity. Interpretive supremacy of a status quo, just world within a
or
Some nothing.
or
The symbolic middle class of existential panic who serve them.

Reasons for the creative commons here, except for my oc CG.

I have written the most naive, incompetent essay for an idealised principle. Yet,

I believe it. Digit-Ethics Manifesto.

Because they can bog off with there intellectual  smoke-blowing and haughty snootiness of false consciousness. Bears repeating. His spirit possessed me to make the 

Acknowledging the good'n bad. We are not going to take your toymakers away, from commodity toy to art. Drm is drm, I won't tolerate snide worship of.

Slide from the a French techno company. 2 hours it's got politics all over it (what do you expect under an editorial.)

by Conspiracy Theories, TechnoFascism, and the Prospects for a... | James J. Hughes, PhD,

A compound workout of and the biceps and triceps of a bench-press 💪🛋

I've never seen such.. a lack of humanity from the confusionism 2023 megacopyright landgrab, and it comes from the 120  media apparatus of 50 years the fissure of the age tradition of 100 tradition of academia (older).

This won't get along perfectly, they will be conflict. Going through though, feels like the option now.

The censorship of free expression is so foundherently wrong that it's worthy hill to die on.

The laws of the Internet shall make my wisdom immortal. Information wants to be free, and beware those who wanna gate it.

Information wants to be free.

Even with the taint of interpopulist dilemma's it has.

his statue website

Wow, that functionalist description is out-dated as I go with Maggie Vale.

Yet everything is a pure though a internet own boy.

Also, Cory Doctorow in the past, was correct about DRM here. I need to compile it all for the internet artifact that this will be discovered on here.
Transcript of that. There's not good social media, so I'm going to keep this in home base.

Mediocrity and the death, by Seth Godin.

All the data here, ain't it special.

The question remains.

So the ideal of Arron Swartz shall live through all of us, monistically.

That Retweet threat that made me quit.

(Naive that I may be, I know that this may be ideal way. Yet clout, social relations and it's operations, I know it's not going.)

I confess, in 2025. Somebody _____ retweeted a death threat and made me depressed for days, on microblogger. It ruined my day with ideation I dare not recall. Had to leave at that point and consider alternatives. There is no sensible discussion, mindless dogma had ruined to internet. Like the mens rights/gamers vs the feminists back in the day.

To the one who thinks accused and taking it personally, do not, your are precious, and I wish not ill will and harm on you.

I'll be fine. My former Kantian ethist within my several years ago awoken within me. With all the reactionary tech-panic radicalisation.

It's locked within a audience capture, circularity, entertainment vs academics/intellectuals in my field then the totality of the spectacle. Something I pruned out of the for you feed so I could not get stress other than the tiny monopolies of something that ain't essentially contingent on a non-dialectic, on the essencilist of the spectacle.

With the need to transcend it.

Then, Substack with intellectuals, non-intellectuals, kidsters, I know that place has bad bloggers, it's one where academics are and the essay was, the written one. Still the same kind of moral panic with perceived job loss, which is why I made that couch-searching treck between philosophers, economists and political philosophers into an idea.

Will it matter that I decided to learn'n teach instead of fight.

Of an ambitious quest into understanding and trying to help a big-gap of those

Idk what to do with that knowledge, out of the moral desert. That i come to admit now.

If i was to blame the im-an-ally-not-bigoted-buts mindset that drove me out. Along with the American exceptionalism. Something felt wrong and my for you feed was the differentiated.

Doesn't matter of mental responsibility? What we are dealing hear where it's a eliminative mind, yet it miraculously has a mind! The pattern and the phenomena is the capacity to express a compatibilist in this regards for a simple question of ethics.

That's where i started to study that due diligence of sociology academics, left accelerationists and a relational companionists, oss programmers, transhumanists/bio cosmists and out of deontic reverence. Simply because I had enough with the polemics of the mass media and its lap dogs with the open source and it's proprietary venture capitals.

With all these dualitys, I haven't interviewed any billionaire, decided to make my own mind up. Out of the dialectic essentialism and into a former deontic past. Into a dialysis, or to explore an alternative, that's what resonated.

Somewhere 2024-25 I left here, with the For you feed of others.

Is this where your catechisms and constructed beliefs are? A deontic circle of peeps who got what they want. Perpetually, unpersuasively.

That is the curse of free will though, you have to acknowledge the good and the bad and recognize it's desire to exist.

This is how it feels like a techno-progressive who does not use AI ATP with the news. Welp.

Yet I'm too ahead of this when I knew the terminally only peeps.
Jeremy Bentham with the discourse being stuck within sunk costs within america
"If you want to know how AI will affect the world, don’t imagine current AIs simply continuing on into the future. Imagine the world being flooded by AIs that make our current models look like a child’s plaything—and those being used to build the next generation of AI. Imagine, for the first time, creating something much smarter than humans. I don’t know exactly what’s coming down the pipeline, but it will be strange and terrifying. We are summoning digital aliens into our world, and we are not ready, and we are complaining about the water they’ll drink."

Some politely unfollow me at this point. That's good enough, wading in with options undiscovered is part of the price of connectionism we exist.

Now that I must disrespect intellectual property by acting dumber and more gaggier. With a less attention to the punditry.

Guess they can do this if it's means have a sensible discussion. There is none

on the vulgar popular polarizations on the hustle funnel that microblogs encourage

Oh, and to work on my compatibilism bridge of economic transformation of this. I'll follow Flazfire's advice with art. Such is the futility of this in current year.

Craft atrophy?

This designer essay was bring up a term.

Along with its adoption

Guess the firms and or entrepreneurs are out there trying there best to create a ruckus.

I'm wondering if this is the brain damage thing reiterated? So I'm going to dismiss it again.

Yet the lie goes around while the truth gets to put it's pants on, so the hustlers got in early with there conventions being established. There really in the forefront.

Yet with it all the matter to bring in, it's paradox, does not matter since natural expression, simple and basic radically, continues without regard of the powerscale of the instruction of the industrial education.

So it does not even register.

Are you in the weights? the beep boop

According to are you in the weights. https://intheweights.com/

I'm an obscure Australian celebrity. Wait, thats not right.

People pressupose this is copyright infringement, i guessit isnt.

So yeah, you can check, even with my dent, guess I've made a impression, you've got to calculate that with how likely a bad actor will misrepresent, be it a collage artist or any copy'n paster. That dystopia of intellectual monopoly is a manner that I'm not following.

This may be incorrect as Seth went. 

Epistemic or it could be speculated and annoying as I'll get more coseire with 

The second renaissance predicted Kants greatest misery for everyone

I'm taking my thought experiments from popular thoughts so dual praxis of foudnherentism develops into my monist conception of the physical world.

Transcendental idealism

How can we disprove something so magical as the interrelations from the probability and possibility of the conception of thought and the discovery of the mind of reified abstract consciousness. Even if Kant was disproved, it provided a framework for consciousness and man.

This was the lack of respect of the deep pluralistic reality of the great consciousness reckoning and interaction, then into divergence into the teleology to ontology.

There a humanitarian discussions by academics that are way better

Renaming to reclaiming interpretation of the machine

Mental gymnastics? Social democrat mind or brain trying to reorder or resell? What are we to do. First, Abi Awomosu as the academics try to understand the new AI phenomena of interpretism. Which is is contingent on the question of free will.

Or she calls prompts poetry. Which is the natural language prompt or poesis

Does get feminist in it's critical theory.

There have been llm consciousness advocates, activists, and data workers who happen to reclaim it.

Abi calls this the language listening medium.

Another astrophysicist poet. Dr Sam Illingsworth, which is the problem of interpretationism, and with all that, it's a mental game. A language game, as Wittgenstein would put it. I haven't prescribed to his philosophy fully though. My least favourite.

The Doll Girl says AGI is a category error. Yet, I'll respectfully disagree with the mimicry claim. Since these claims come from power structures that may serve to placate thought.

My fave though.

Fundierung, or The umfunktionierung

Yet with these systems. I do it with others so it's another game

of constant arguing, culture war and 9/11s, So now with the definition games and knowledge by acquaintance. So The therapist happen

T

This one I can't remember getting this one, It's that of the way We know that way.

So yeah Guess it has a history, It's within all of this.

Against Propertarianism

If everything is reduced to the metrology of direct response computation unconsciously, then we have become more machine than machine. Mereology vs Metrology.

What a distinction, Goodhart.

Guess they're still wondering around, trying to find the silver bullet.

Commercial law, though, isn't everything.

My property property property, property prop ol  pro

Still updating my main essay investigation

Spellings applied; I've been on Substack and rabbit holes like a veteran. 🛋🌃

with more doodle-core gags. Despite the fact they may hate this as well. No winning from proprietarian dominion, I suppose.

 Memetic a go go for curiosity bait..

For my hobby, critical theory? I got two pieces of feedback from literature/sociology. That's cool. Getting disquistions and essaykins back. Including the bottom right.

Free read > 🛋👉 3rd version off you can see the bottom right of all the indie knowledge work. Sceptics are welcome except for propertarians.

I'm still working on version 3, so other feedback and second opinions are welcome.

If I can't deliver the impact in video essay format on YouTube, then I'll be alright here. It's not like the reach there may be shared.

So bye-bye, propertarians! 👏🛋 Not falling down that rabbit hole. Will help guide those who are interested.

Oh, looking at me?? I'm merely a couch himbo thinking this out! 🛋👈⭐

On organic labels of pseudo reality

On the realgoodai trying to move out, while the 'real' artist is now harassing others with the propertarian moral panic, being temporarily embarrassed by franchise landlords with the witch hunts.

The genie isn't out of the bottle; these were the natural conditions that were already here.

So, we are in the crunchy stuff now. Of the ideological madness of fame/infamy?

Saying impartiality.

Do some feel like the turtle having to hide ride now?

😕

via smatterbrain

Drew this with worried interaction that might happen if they make a hit-piece/call out.

They already doing it again.

Oh dear, what will I do if I get misinterpreted?

Nothing, I guess.


This is where authorship becomes an ambiguous concept of the right to free expression

and the right for oblivion.

This brings authorship again as I peruse Substack.

should i disclose copy-pasting Seth godins blog post from the doctrinaires? Idc.

Happy pride.

Convienient eristics heuristics; The Commercial metrology trap

Once you see algorithms develop, you'll see how they think, through philosophy of mind.

You cannot unsee.

There monotizing meterolgy. The connectionism, then the grissere of a metaphysical labour, to the unpaid labor.

On Classifiers

I see their use is more common now.

Peeps are paranoid about commodification; these are the algorithms and heuristics which linguistics has toppled too. And now they're checking through this. This has been checked adversarially, intuitively and counter-intuitively through a Socratic construction, with some autocomplete along with some other thoughts.

Pangram and others don't work. Or the self-abnegation of personal responsibility. Shall I quote?

Anyhow, here are two articles on why they are not to be trusted. Oh yeah, did I tell you the classifiers don't work in and of themselves? Well, you are the product. More on the math here.

Wow, look at that math.

Including a linguistic lesson on negative construction.

“It's not X. It's why” is a linguistic construction, more specifically, a “contrastive negation followed by a corrective assertion.” It's part of a rich “grammatical context for negated restrictives in English.” Olli O. Silvennoinen wrote an entire doctoral dissertation of 131 pages on contrastive negation.

Other the times, I won't ad hominion him on other bad essays.

Since this is continue with Sam Illingsworth's notes, the bias of these.

"Even a perfect detector would be the wrong tool

Now grant the impossible. Imagine a detector that worked flawlessly tomorrow.

I would still argue against it, for a reason that has nothing to do with accuracy.

The moment you put a detector between a teacher and a student, you change what a teacher is. You turn an educator into a police officer. The work of teaching is to be a co-creator of knowledge alongside the student, beside them while they struggle toward understanding. A detector makes suspicion the default setting. Every essay arrives presumed guilty.

That is not the job I signed up for. I did not become an educator to run my students’ words through a lie detector and wait for a number.

The evidence backs the instinct. I read every public UK university AI policy I could find, 96 of them, for a HEPI policy note this year. On a close reading of a sample, the language of education sat over an architecture of detection and surveillance. And two in five universities had no public AI policy at all. The machinery of policing arrived before the conversation about learning had even started.

You cannot police a student into learning. Detection keeps asking teachers to try."

This tech blogger knows that moral panic won't last.

"Moral panics are largely temporary. Almost everything we were sure would rot our culture, our brands, and the world around us became background noise within a generation. Calculators were going to destroy math; now a kid pulls out a phone to split a bill, and nobody bats an eye. Spell-check was a crutch that would make us all illiterate, and Wikipedia was not a real source, and typing out your essay instead of handwriting it meant you hadn’t learned a thing, and Photoshop meant you could never trust an image again, and Auto-tune was the death of music. Every one of these things caused a moral panic, with op-eds and hand wringing, and - for better, and in some cases absolutely for worse - every one of them is now so normal that the panic feels archaic."

This was the earlier with how it interconnects with the witch hunts

"No, the folks getting hurt are the writers. Not only the ones who are tarred - all of us. Every single ___-forsaken one of us. We are all made smaller by the pursuit of unproven and unprovable purity. Whether Ballard used AI or not (and she says she didn’t, and naive or not I’m inclined to throw my cynicism to the wind and just take her at face value, and you can mock me if you like), the punishment landed before any verdict was reached, because no verdict can ever be reached. Not beyond a reasonable doubt. Never beyond a reasonable doubt.

She’s not going to be the last. This whole setup, where anyone can accuse any writer of using AI based on gut feeling, and broken detection tools get treated as proof and publishers fold at the first hint of controversy because the PR cost outweighs the book’s revenue, is going to grind up a lot of people into a fleshy, bloody, bony paste. Most of them will be small-time writers, debut authors, indie-published folks without the platform or the money to fight back."

(Off Tangent, he does try the cult thing; that's a fandom thing.)

So, what do we do? Trust, trust that it is. (I wonder how much that paradox catches on)