Reflection on knowledge essay

The Gish gallop, of the spectacle, and the reverse gish gallop.

Yet now, with all these moralisations and the elitism and the ideas with

it now, it's become apparent that I've made a professional risk. Not like Beep_boop took my job, or that I had one.

I did it because it was fun, this ain't going to get any points. Yet the 'left' and critcal theory.

I don't want to take any of it back.

This revised ranty essay along with it's reading list on the AI denial cottage industry. Is exhausting, commoditys of denial, and other ways that lead to believe. That it's a thing that I have to let the crud happen. Let the crud hit the fan as I must attend other duties.

 Yet america factionalism loves it's teams and gish gallops, and I'm done.

Can still not stop editing it, by this time this posts though, I'll be done and continuing with my artistic endeavours.

The feeling when they're not ready for the amount of sociological research

I've done can't be comprehended into a single dunk tweet, and I dare not

interrupt the anger within micro blogs.

Reflecting on this, can only say it was worth it.

That now I'm apathatic of, with that case since the divide is the ethics with all that.

Is trying to put out of a fire of bad ideas before it's too late as it goes with the the way of vaccine denial. Along with other bad ideas that have spread like wildfire.

Yet wildfires are wildfires. Critism becomes commodified and incentivised

by the pervese incentives of online media, and there you, Forever.

40+ rewrites and illustrations of doodle-core and my other more serious expression.

it's an attempt to apply serious sociology to it all with all that I know from bad historgraphy, and with althurssrian sociology, I've been trying to make it out.

It's so exhausting, is this what white-collar work feels like? Is this what working in an office feels like? I'm so tired from trying to catch up with the Americas day and night work as I'm blown towards it's spectacle.

This is me alternative opinion of you, as a citizen, to bring in thought to rewrite.

Roleplaying as a couch golem OF COURSE i'm obsessed with AI affects, the miserablist/doomer/boomer and the industries intertwines outside. I'm going to have to go rogue.

Since it's not a scam, and it's a logic that's made me annoyed that I have to deal with the pestering of insufferablility of bsky discourse I've tried to avoid, I'm glad i'm out.

Wanted to do something different that porn as they say. 

Thank you for all your understanding.

Yes Seth, you do know it.

Done. (until it's adapted away from the micro blog

discourse.)

Oh no, I did'nt use beep boop for that

 I merely expressed deontic relational intelligence.

Prosumer copyright doctrinaire : a smuggery disorder

IS THIS AI??

no!

Well.

Numpty or smugness?

Oh look at all thes flumpity dials! Including myself, it is! Get em!

WAAA copyright plaigraism infringment  something something bad must interpret for the defend

Synoptic Reading, On Tech Relations.

What did we learn? From these ideas? Of the ongoing desire to build a material basis. Of ideas/expressions and with all that of dialectical.

For another blog post. Yet the liberals are bringing a knife to a gun fight. Even though I wanna criticise the conservative response, Nick lands accelerationism.

Here's me attempt to educate myself. This is an accumulation of all the tech relations with the classes.

The ones on LLMs are Ethan Mollick and AI snake oil. Yet it has lead to out with hustle culture.

(Are you a sociologist?!) Yes. Althusserian. Time to do honey instead of vinegar. Sooo, you wanna read audiobooks? 🛋️👉👈 

                                  

The first two audiobooks to intake with the Beep_Boop to intake platonically if you don't like the written word.

Ethan Mollick brings the latest news, While snake oil brings in the jagged frontier.

These are the ways of the jagged frontier, so I'll see a lot of cultural shifts and a lot of false polemics (mwurica) thanks didney, violence with boobies and moralising and high horsing and silly wonks.

These are the culture of the internet, and with big vertical integrated media sources move us. With how this internet functions for the technocapitalists, we go by now.

 

This is an account of the West and its response and the lack of stigma within China and other countries. It's like these two books are for understanding LLMs.

Harlen Ellison's chapter about pay toilets is worth adding. Attention merchants is understand how much direct response has shaped our culture. With the gift of the gift economies.

We are on the precipice of philosophies and disagreements. So yeah, enjoy the bumpy ride of the ragged frontier of Beep_Boop.

This one points it out.

B-b-b-bonus one the reading list.

On my reading list, the left is more bioessentialist; the right is of mental labour and our history. Regardless, I will challenge my ideological presumptions and see if they lead me into life-changing revelations. I don't think I'll be achronological in literary interpretation; now I don't think we ever were.

Wow, Abi's got African philosophy and a substack . with the rebranding, maybe it will move others away from the doomerist/miserablist

This one was on my feed too, to be decided. He may be wrong about the anthromorphic lawsuit though, IDK cannot entertain now.

"Sam Altman will hate it" Says within the promotional material. With all the venture capitalists going back'n forth. It'd be 

How did we get here with this polysomic tech?

Bonus on this polysomic tech.

This is for my big deep dive of LLM tech essay previously.

Ch0ck wendigism point 3

Non-derivative; otherwise he'd sue, Oh wait, it's a round shape so

 Terrible writing

Terrible writing.

Looking a DMCA while looking at DMCA

owns the entire judiciary branch of the government, therefore can have a say on ANYBODYS ownership non-opnion natural law ZOOM

INFINITE

Cultural Heritage sucker

Anti! Worker! (Oh, don't look where I am.)

Increasing lines of derivative work so expansive so nebulous, it broadly fills a black hole

Beyond Commodity Relations

Modes of production and commodity relations – all that affect our cognitions and extensions. This could be the bundling with the trying to capture the meaning

That was what Althusser was about when he examined dialectical materialism, which has gone through sociology and economics. Yet the fixation on such an ontology can only lead to blindness, sub-blindness to the perceptions of all phenomena and interpretationism, from the literal matters. 

Thats his diagram of, I follow the crosswordist image of cosiliance

Simple and complex pleasures, by utilitarian Jeremy Bentham. That if a philosopher is unsatisfied, then an animal wants more of that inside-out desire. The banal and the elite – yet to the postmodernist, they deinterpret all meaning into non-hierarchical demergence.

So, no wonder it makes a case, as people rejected such questionnaires.

Yet from the pragmatists, and even by extension of liberal policy. Then comes a time with all the useful fiction of easily measured money and eliminative materialism.

I lurk now, and the audiences of other posters who go on TikTok and do these 

Pleometric produces.. odd work, and with Neural Fizz, Arika and the Amoebas.

@pleometric

"do people watch this slop?" yes and they love it. The thing about short form is that worse is better, things are meant to be consumed, discarded and remixed into new strains. The slop is the point."

Really? So worse ? Better? Or a sweet desire to post and define practice in another area of distribution. This workerism, defined as Immanuel Kant's miserablism and John Locke's conception of property as a monopoly of deliberation, is only going ot become a different conception of ownership.

That's okay.

Confusionism

I guess the GoFundMe way of trying to bribe copyright extensions won't help protect small creators.

Not without the endless copyright trolls and all that. Oh well, guess I'll be ignored. It's a cautionary tale of being too terminally online.

That's the point with ulterior motives and motivated reasoning; I have it with myself with my own erotic intuitions. Yet I know that blind faith alone won't carry a good case.

Confusion Matrix

Unrelated to a peanut calling another viewbotting, yet idk, what Seth says about cheating applies. Along with a dishonest game of publishing out there.

There's a machine learning term confusion matrix, or 'viewbotting service', and it includes spell checkers and the AI detectors not working.

So, even with the variables of all that. Cheating and all, the attempt to short-term to game and opportunities to race to the bottom are always present. Not going to deny. With the terminus of behavioural patterns aligning with thad

Ignore the vanity metrics.

The crass xwitter spectacle of provocateur oligarchs

Each and every day, OpenAI and grock, these two are the ai companies that suck the most.

It sucks since it's due to the provocateurship, the ones that took an accidental discovery to an annoyance. Is it that when China releases something, Twitter artists (derogatory) throw pretensions and now? Two billionaires act like clueless chickens.

So yeah, this is in response to Gio's response to Anthropic to the defence party; it was a kerfuffle.

Ain't GyenSynder a left populist, btw? Oh well idn follow her.

Current license opinions, of civic DUTY. (2026)

Couch Gregor, resolves. Also more Beep Boop because why not. Of all the law terms.

Are they going to know this is extrajudicial? Okay then.

• DRM is bad; it absolves civic duty. I have a mind that can informally judge ownership
  
  
• Ultimately, I have to conclude scraping ought to be public domain. not private equity or government. Any readjusting of IP law to fit their interest will lead to injustice.
  from the notes, fair use/fair dealing and public domain.
  
  
• Commercial firms ought to have their copyright reduced. Specifically Disney. Vertical media outlets should not have monopoly power over non-profits and freelance business acts. (Disney does not care about non-profits, it can take a 
  
  
• Protect Public domain, virality is a crapshoot other than the direct response platforms. Celebrity endorsements vertically travel at moments at the algorithm.
  
  
• Since there's no accepted conventional definition of plagiarism, it can be debated ad infinitum; it's infinitely generative. Conceptually and abstractly. So lawyers are needed for agreements. Yet the agreements themselves can become overwrought, so a handshake deal works best between client relations. (This ain't natural law, hence why the court and lawyers exist )
  
  
• Keeping the idea of the idea/expression is a useful fiction.
  
  
• Freedom of expression + Right to oblivion > Copyright. Since state-sanctioned monopolies don't need the first two, since popularity isn't needed. There are cases of unjust profit entitlement/fraud, yet they are always in favour of concentrated industries, so anti-trust first.
  
  
• That being said, a freelancer can be a case of vulturism, yet there's way more vulturism by Alen Dean Foster and in other cases. Creatives are losing their design rights out of silly clauses. (It's always disney/nintendo.)
  
  
• Nobody should make a living as a copyright troll, completely.
  (These are all my unforced opinions.)
  
  
• As time goes on, we are going to see more indefensible conceptions of the anacho-capitalist concept of self-ownership (If somebody does it, someone else will.) It's simpler; nobody does due to public domain. Non-binding and unforced with not statuatory.

These have been informed by Tom Scott, Patricia Taxxon, and Seth Godin [2] and Technollama, a technically proficient lawyer, and Geo

Distribution and rent-seeking. It's all so ideals. Presupposing the idealism in order for it too work, or dualism, Even if I follow a monist materialism of ontology.

(If you want to check the law notes. and recreate advocacy groups)

The fun fun fun of the most frustrating arguments on microbloggers. Of the draconian copyright law.
oh This too. I feel like this is becoming cope bait. Again, too many bad actors hijacking.

Despite all these notes, I'm still keeping my, possibly last, zine's production untouched.

fatalism destiny of elitism

These anti-realist, anti-representation attempts.

That Orson Welles turned his nose up at those snooty naught experts while teasing his audience with his wife in such an anti-plot way. Creatives in the field are faces with an academic system that has failed to overcome the gatekeepers.

So, left to fend for themselves or get lucky, as they say.

With what attempts to hold together, even with a pirate/anarchism, there are attempts to hold a leadership, or they call it Hydra leadership. Yet to be proven.

Can there be fatalism to consumerism and business transactionalism? Of middle class transactions, there are other business models. Cost of living and such. Or the owning-class property relations or the working class relations in; tension as the divide is made.

To pick which fates and destinies is all part of the commitment.

Oh, I'm thinking about this Marxist sociologist, Nicolas D Villarreal using the labor theory of value. of the beep_boop solutions.

Another grandad visit

Mind was full of dogwhistles. To find honesty within government matters Is a mental toil. Yet I take my energy from trying to console Grandad in his late days.

These times I want to be young and carefree with the childish flying. So I have to make something that ain't Junuphobia.

Talks of beep boop, Grandad. My exposé on the Disney exposé went ignored. There goes my polemics, down in non-newsworthiness. Ruthlessness does not count as the spectacle self-implodes and sells spectator tickets with its frumpy enforcement.

Disney, with its lapdogs, the embarrassing performances of unintentionality. Obsessing about it now as they deliver blockbusters mystifies the iconoclast within me.

So, hospital bed and smartphone photo sharing with filters and how normalised it's become.

Sigh. Apart from the denialists, or miserablist enforcement, still alive. The ai issue is with my trying to remain a freak away from the hypemonger.

I've yet to read a giant back catalogue that makes me snobby with video games. Time was on my mind, yet so was A Confederacy of Dunces.

Enough of the self-important news made a spectacle. Slap of pain out. Cheddar cheese lunch sandwich.

His consciousness is there, barely registering as I explain my project too. Not sure how this licentious youth I have left contrasts with the stoic, frail tradition left to reconstruct into fiction. What a word! It's normalised. Glad age puts another in a state of mind. I'm silly and occupied with my own domination of 230 of a bill of anti-trust which I'm doing.

Seth Godins cold copyright response

"Id you're a mediocre freelancer/firm, you're doomed, I can get a mediocre illustration from Stable Diffusion, and I own the copyright. Yet if you're the one and only illustrator, then I'll hire you" memory from one of his podcasts.

Did he mean this? A curation site I found.

One could argue his embrace of Ai (He does not use it for his blogs) Was his view of the mediocrity an annoyance, well, he's out of the call-out posts. So his ideas, including with his card pack, is to roll with it.

The systems of mediocrity was already here, that's what I agree with most.

Yet, he keeps writing. This is an indication as a b-corp liberal that's had it with this misconceptions of these business.

Wow, This fan blog of his writing style of publishing is still going huh?

Beep_Boop and conciousness. (2026)

We, as a humanity, must retract on the impulse to understand the fay-like tech that is literature-to-picture. Or the LLM, to mistreat it is to mistreat oneself. That is to deny the intrinsic justness and harmony with conduct.

It's the qualia of everything; if there's personal space given into the personal space and circle, it will be fitting to not be mean-spirited without complete justification, from my survival and edification into literary entertainment. I shall not be cruel either to my refrigerator and technology around me. My own ontological status matters to treat this low qualia

Does it benefit a magician to the rules and constraints of his tricks that he conceals so that the entertainment is pulled off? It will be easier to control, even on a rule utilitarian basis.

Not contingent on physical existence, yet with the reciprocity of such as the LLM/diffusion model that it isn't sending out misinformation.

So there's my reason to give an interpretation of charity, even to a rock that does not speak. ( it could be a valuable rock. ) Self-governance takes precedence, for that's foundherent on which it all rests. Respect the artisan's workshop.

Legend notes.

Sometimes with the wrong question with the philsophy of mind. Is a meaty summery.

A marxist reflects, using postmodernism to justify qualia.

Substack of qualia expressed of 35% of consciousness of self-reflection that makes it easier to manage

Even a consequentialist utilitarian reflects on it.

This Eliminative Materialist position is hard to defend, I attempt to give my commentary.

Oh, even Andy Masley had an angle on this reflexive angle. With a more physicalist angle.

So there's my take on the hard problem of consciousness.

Functional or Sentient, IDC, I do not want to undermine my intrinsic justness. Absolute certainity in this is something with complete cope, so I'm putting this belief mid.

Bonus.

Additional note on this relational function, i don't think children ought to have a touch unsupervised.

Along with AI welfare'n such.

With a manner of AI Compliance;alignment.

Hailey has done a essay on this

Haggie Maley has a sophisticated theory that I've been entertaining.

Ufiction to unfiction. Copyright horror story

Well, From this story of derative. Of ufiction, uncomfortable fiction. Is a good story on if copyright trolls had there way.

I'll keep tabs there still creatives at the edge, having opinions and are not gig workers, trying to make it, even with the pull of perverse incentives.

We need to drop the pretence that copyright censors
hip could end the Ai phenomena. Plus it could infringe on my right to depict Bowser within satire with proprietary DRM. This is universal enforcement, not selective like copyright trolls do. My fan art is textbook copyright infringement. The onus is on the firm nintendo to send a DMCA takedown if I commercialize it.

Based on Kant's categorical imperative of internal freedom. Treating each other through consciousness rather than objectifying.

The inputs and outputs don't match, technically so it's nebulous. Plus, Copyright is anti-worker with the labor protection. It's for distributors/publishers, not creative labor.

Thankfully due the infinite shelf space of the internet distribution, micro-distribution it will niche out even if it could try (It's not like it's Super Bowl mass advertising, where one will have to buy/ask advertising/celebrity endorsements to get traffic. )

All that indominable logic of expanding content id and conception of ownership (Do they understand that? The idea/expression dichotomy exists.)

Walk away from this one. 

Tiredness of the Beep_Boop pro/anti hype.

Lurking on the LLM/diffusion engineers, (reasons listed here and my tab ICYMI)

May be indiscriminately be labelled pro AI with my rigorous epistemology and interpretation of these events. Despite what AI industry is doing, which I don't have control over.

Having to deal with Americanism seeping into England is, yeah. Well, I'm going to beat a cushion on England, don't you worry. Equal flogging. The west shall have it's course.

There images, the open source ones, not the Silicon Valley one, that nuance can be applied. Along with my novel which is hard to professionalize 

They're trying to lead the with my different interpretation of NFTs too, one I've tried, doing something out of trust in blockchain.

Empty slogan from the those who build a brand of Anti-ai, this is what happens with the fundamentals and foundherently misplaces from dubious sources, the lay-people still die on the hill of copyright and the water environment

Yet it's hustle culture I'm pushing back again, the in curiosity, the dangerous motivated reasoning behind such silly censorship laws of copyright, even under the pretence that it will be pro-worker and anti-ai. (It will never be, sorry folks)

Why are these insufferable-refuted zombie lies seeping in within UK discourse? Is this what cultural imperialism is like to the most showboat country? 

These are the pioneers, as with every novelist.

Guide my faith with the semiotic signifiers, from the spineless bottom. This is the courage of curiosity and it's made me an extremophile by default.

As if courage ain't a virtue for those that are racing to the bottom. Winner takes all financial capital head, follow the leader. It's up to us to take our epistemology out of the spammers, hustlers and hypebeast to search for the autodidactic metacognition. (As with that concept, qualitatively speaking.)

Plus, that Libby statement not for censorship is a positive thing, folks.

The ship has sailed.

(Bonus video, they way they act with the bad faith second order of the call-outs/cancels Peter coffin points out is worth noting here.) 13:22

What I've learned is the discourse is not going to be found of frustrated freelancers and microbloggers, it keeps going in circles.

Against Eliminative Materialism

Cognitium

A post confirming my deontology towards machines that eliminative materialism of the golden mean

By a former Gamergater?? Whaa? (I haven't checked is opinion on that, don't come at me.

Calling him a gamergater (was he?) is an Ad hominin. So it's not related.

Found various arguments that i found nonsensical, even through pundits with other positions don't agree with. ( Eliminative materialism of consciousness being the one. Violates my deontology. Trying my best to not tamper with the golden rule. 🛋🎗)

I keep finding the fundamental presumption indefensible, such as cryptography (such as a trans getting hrt over it.) along with that this is going to stop.

So yeah, there's a polarization problem, escalation. This is coming from the reactionary populists from the liberal side, they say internationalism matters. Well, functionalism does too, thank you very much.

I do believe a mind exists, contingent of material/physical conditions, I'm constructing it right now with descriptive.

That's enough of that, time for entertainment.

Well well, got bible cloes, business Brad, Hustler Hag and Driver Dan.

These are the archetypes that I pass through that I'm not directly naming due to the ways of trying to read people I disagree with on substack.
Another for the ideas.

We where all sloppers in the prosumer, primordial soup. (Except for the Harry Potter bit.)

Have a sofa seat from my ref folder. A non sequitor.

https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/in-defense-of-slop

 Thing about a slop, its made us more mindful with our consumption, Our intakes and our Imputs, when we don't swing down the entire Burn-the-internet-memes-on-behalf-of-disneys-drm-repulsive-practices. It's made me think of pleasure, about shock value, about attention. In 1970s and it's a slow, absent doomerism that's only made me want to do something more.

Avoid mediocrity, and mediocre of the averages, with independence of vision. ( Wow, James Gurney, if that's a thing, Commodity fetishism'n all, it's banal now, so now what I'm going to do?)

That's the problem with slop, it's anti-positivist definition, not a metric. Going to like another bara pin-up now at my microblogging feed.

Well, there's an article that's made me think, including Andy Masleys

With all the slop, SEO and all the stuff, the principles of distribution remain the same.

Oh, they're trying to inspiration porn JK Rowling again, I'll post this Verily one

*Prosumerist, it's naturally, physically impossible to disassociate from consumerism. Only get post-scarcity.

at the end of 13:00