Craft atrophy?

This designer essay was bring up a term.

Along with its adoption

Guess the firms and or entrepreneurs are out there trying there best to create a ruckus.

I'm wondering if this is the brain damage thing reiterated? So I'm going to dismiss it again.

Yet the lie goes around while the truth gets to put it's pants on, so the hustlers got in early with there conventions being established. There really in the forefront.

Yet with it all the matter to bring in, it's paradox, does not matter since natural expression, simple and basic radically, continues without regard of the powerscale of the instruction of the industrial education.

So it does not even register.

Are you in the weights? the beep boop

According to are you in the weights. https://intheweights.com/

I'm an obscure Australian celebrity. Wait, thats not right.

People pressupose this is copyright infringement, i guessit isnt.

So yeah, you can check, even with my dent, guess I've made a impression, you've got to calculate that with how likely a bad actor will misrepresent, be it a collage artist or any copy'n paster. That dystopia of intellectual monopoly is a manner that I'm not following.

This may be incorrect as Seth went. 

Epistemic or it could be speculated and annoying as I'll get more coseire with 

The second renaissance predicted Kants greatest misery for everyone

I'm taking my thought experiments from popular thoughts so dual praxis of foudnherentism develops into my monist conception of the physical world.

Transcendental idealism

How can we disprove something so magical as the interrelations from the probability and possibility of the conception of thought and the discovery of the mind of reified abstract consciousness. Even if Kant was disproved, it provided a framework for consciousness and man.

This was the lack of respect of the deep pluralistic reality of the great consciousness reckoning and interaction, then into divergence into the teleology to ontology.

There a humanitarian discussions by academics that are way better

Renaming to reclaiming interpretation

Mental gymnastics? Social democrat mind or brain trying to reorder or resell? What are we to do.

Or she calls prompts poetry. Which is the natural language prompt.

There have been llm consciousness advocates, activists, and data workers who happen to reclaim it.

Abi calls this the language listening medium.

Another astrophysicist poet. Dr Sam Illingsworth, which is the problem of interpretationism, and with all that, it's a mental game. A language game, as Wittgenstein would put it.

The Doll Girl says AGI is a category error. Yet, I'll respectfully disagree with the mimicry claim. Since these claims come from power structures that may serve to placate thought.

Fundierung, or The umfunktionierung

Yet with these systems. I do it with others so it's another game

of constant arguing, culture war and 9/11s, So now with the definition games and knowledge by acquaintance. So The therapist happen

T

This one I can't remember getting this one, It's that of the way We know that way.

So yeah Guess it has a history, It's within all of this.

Against Propertarianism

If everything is reduced to the metrology of direct response computation unconsciously, then we have become more machine than machine. Mereology vs Metrology.

What a distinction, Goodhart.

Guess they're still wondering around, trying to find the silver bullet.

Commercial law, though, isn't everything.

My property property property, property prop ol  pro

Still updating my main essay investigation

Spellings applied; I've been on Substack and rabbit holes like a veteran. 🛋🌃

with more doodle-core gags. Despite the fact they may hate this as well. No winning from proprietarian dominion, I suppose.

 Memetic a go go for curiosity bait..

For my hobby, critical theory? I got two pieces of feedback from literature/sociology. That's cool. Getting disquistions and essaykins back. Including the bottom right.

Free read > 🛋👉 3rd version off you can see the bottom right of all the indie knowledge work. Sceptics are welcome except for propertarians.

I'm still working on version 3, so other feedback and second opinions are welcome.

If I can't deliver the impact in video essay format on YouTube, then I'll be alright here. It's not like the reach there may be shared.

So bye-bye, propertarians! 👏🛋 Not falling down that rabbit hole. Will help guide those who are interested.

Oh, looking at me?? I'm merely a couch himbo thinking this out! 🛋👈⭐

On organic labels of pseudo reality

On the realgoodai trying to move out, while the 'real' artist is now harassing others with the propertarian moral panic, being temporarily embarrassed by franchise landlords with the witch hunts.

The genie isn't out of the bottle; these were the natural conditions that were already here.

So, we are in the crunchy stuff now. Of the ideological madness of fame/infamy?

Saying impartiality.

Do some feel like the turtle having to hide ride now?

😕

via smatterbrain

Drew this with worried interaction that might happen if they make a hit-piece/call out.

They already doing it again.

Oh dear, what will I do if I get misinterpreted?

Nothing, I guess.


This is where authorship becomes an ambiguous concept of the right to free expression

and the right for oblivion.

This brings authorship again as I peruse Substack.

should i disclose copy-pasting Seth godins blog post from the doctrinaires? Idc.

Happy pride.

Convienient eristics heuristics; The Commercial metrology trap

Once you see algorithms develop, you'll see how they think, through philosophy of mind.

You cannot unsee.

There monotizing meterolgy. The connectionism, then the grissere of a metaphysical labour, to the unpaid labor.

On Classifiers

I see their use is more common now.

Peeps are paranoid about commodification; these are the algorithms and heuristics which linguistics has toppled too. And now they're checking through this. This has been checked adversarially, intuitively and counter-intuitively through a Socratic construction, with some autocomplete along with some other thoughts.

Pangram and others don't work. Or the self-abnegation of personal responsibility. Shall I quote?

Anyhow, here are two articles on why they are not to be trusted. Oh yeah, did I tell you the classifiers don't work in and of themselves? Well, you are the product. More on the math here.

Wow, look at that math.

Including a linguistic lesson on negative construction.

“It's not X. It's why” is a linguistic construction, more specifically, a “contrastive negation followed by a corrective assertion.” It's part of a rich “grammatical context for negated restrictives in English.” Olli O. Silvennoinen wrote an entire doctoral dissertation of 131 pages on contrastive negation.

Other the times, I won't ad hominion him on other bad essays.

Since this is continue with Sam Illingsworth's notes, the bias of these.

"Even a perfect detector would be the wrong tool

Now grant the impossible. Imagine a detector that worked flawlessly tomorrow.

I would still argue against it, for a reason that has nothing to do with accuracy.

The moment you put a detector between a teacher and a student, you change what a teacher is. You turn an educator into a police officer. The work of teaching is to be a co-creator of knowledge alongside the student, beside them while they struggle toward understanding. A detector makes suspicion the default setting. Every essay arrives presumed guilty.

That is not the job I signed up for. I did not become an educator to run my students’ words through a lie detector and wait for a number.

The evidence backs the instinct. I read every public UK university AI policy I could find, 96 of them, for a HEPI policy note this year. On a close reading of a sample, the language of education sat over an architecture of detection and surveillance. And two in five universities had no public AI policy at all. The machinery of policing arrived before the conversation about learning had even started.

You cannot police a student into learning. Detection keeps asking teachers to try."

This tech blogger knows that moral panic won't last.

"Moral panics are largely temporary. Almost everything we were sure would rot our culture, our brands, and the world around us became background noise within a generation. Calculators were going to destroy math; now a kid pulls out a phone to split a bill, and nobody bats an eye. Spell-check was a crutch that would make us all illiterate, and Wikipedia was not a real source, and typing out your essay instead of handwriting it meant you hadn’t learned a thing, and Photoshop meant you could never trust an image again, and Auto-tune was the death of music. Every one of these things caused a moral panic, with op-eds and hand wringing, and - for better, and in some cases absolutely for worse - every one of them is now so normal that the panic feels archaic."

This was the earlier with how it interconnects with the witch hunts

"No, the folks getting hurt are the writers. Not only the ones who are tarred - all of us. Every single ___-forsaken one of us. We are all made smaller by the pursuit of unproven and unprovable purity. Whether Ballard used AI or not (and she says she didn’t, and naive or not I’m inclined to throw my cynicism to the wind and just take her at face value, and you can mock me if you like), the punishment landed before any verdict was reached, because no verdict can ever be reached. Not beyond a reasonable doubt. Never beyond a reasonable doubt.

She’s not going to be the last. This whole setup, where anyone can accuse any writer of using AI based on gut feeling, and broken detection tools get treated as proof and publishers fold at the first hint of controversy because the PR cost outweighs the book’s revenue, is going to grind up a lot of people into a fleshy, bloody, bony paste. Most of them will be small-time writers, debut authors, indie-published folks without the platform or the money to fight back."

(Off Tangent, he does try the cult thing; that's a fandom thing.)

So, what do we do? Trust, trust that it is. (I wonder how much that paradox catches on)

Funny sex joke reads

Writing the mega-essay took a lot out of me, back to otium. Proudest iconoclastic work.

Again, I'm an irenicist when it comes to beep boop, so consider this journalism against the cognitive Bias.

Yet at the time when this simple and difficult conversations. I'm going to have to consider if it's like I'm going to interrupt.

Ho to rip a mans D___ off which is another.

Beep boop Girlfriends of investigative journalism

Beep boop Orgasm

Gosh yes good sir, Ho ho ho. There's a eye-sore if that was well.

aaaaaaaaaaah

Sex reads overloaded with incomrpehensible sex essay, It was a high performer though!

Sexy sex.

Reflection on knowledge rant

The Gish gallop, of the spectacle, and the reverse gish gallop.

Yet now, with all these moralisations and the elitism and the ideas with

it now, it's become apparent that I've made a professional risk. Not like Beep_boop took my job, or that I had one.

I did it because it was fun, this ain't going to get any points. Yet the 'left' and critcal theory. Of a polemic that drives scrutiny. the microblogger was not of a desire the reify

This revised ranty essay along with it's reading list on the AI denial cottage industry. Is exhausting, commodities of denial, and other ways that lead to believe. That it's a thing that I have to let the crud happen. Let the crud hit the fan as I must attend other duties.

Yet America's factionalism loves its teams and gish gallops, and I'm done.

Dialectical my cushions!

Can still not stop editing it. By this time, this post, though, I'll be done and continuing with my artistic endeavours.

The feeling when they're not ready for the amount of sociological research

I've done can't be comprehended into a single dunk tweet, and I dare not

interrupt the anger within micro blogs.

It's merely too BIG i can't fit it in, such aliteral mobs
harrasmenet to handle such a complexity.

Reflecting on this, can only say it was worth it. It's the most iconclastic thing I've

ever done, and it's spirit of Harlen Ellison's rant within his Glass Teat.

He's gone now.

ah, Symbolic capital, and the structural things

are reversed now, as 1Dime points out.

That now I'm apathetic of, with that case since the divide is the ethics with all that.

It is trying to put out a fire of bad ideas before it's too late, as it goes with the way of vaccine denial. Along with other bad ideas that have spread like wildfire.

Yet wildfires are wildfires. Criticism becomes commodified and incentivised

by the perverse incentives of online media, and there you are, forever.

40+ rewrites and illustrations of doodle-core and my other more serious expression.

It's an attempt to apply serious sociology to it all with all that I know from bad historiography, and with Althusserian sociology, I've been trying to make it out.

It's so exhausting. Is this what white-collar work feels like? Is this what working in an office feels like? I'm so tired from trying to catch up with the Americas' day and night work as I'm drawn towards its spectacle.

This is my alternative opinion of you as a citizen to bring in thought to rewrite.

Roleplaying as a couch golem – OF COURSE. I'm obsessed with AI effects, the miserablist/doomer/boomer and the industries intertwined outside them. I'm going to have to go rogue.

Since it's not a scam and it's a logic that's made me annoyed that I have to deal with the pestering insufferability of bsky discourse I've tried to avoid, I'm glad I'm out.

Wanted to do something different from porn, as they say. 

Thank you for all your understanding.

Yes Seth, you do know it.

Done. (until it's adapted away from the micro blog

discourse.)

Oh no, I did'nt use beep boop for that

 I merely expressed deontic relationalism

Real good ai btw despite my vigourous

research. I'll reach out. Even as goals may not align.

Bonus. This could be for the epilogue.

This article, even with such non-trusted people in state positions, tends to make me reflect.

Yeah

"It’s both intellectually and morally thin. But it’s also unawarely hypocritical. That’s because, at its root, this anti-tech discourse is ironically anti-human. It frames us as the machines. We’re positioned as passive victims of digital services and the devices they’re served through in ways that discount our capacity for agency, intentionality and responsibility. It’s insulting because we’re deemed to be morons by default, incapable of reforming our habits."

"Phones “make” us distracted. AI “makes” us lazy. Algorithms “make” us tribal. Social media “makes” us narcissistic

It’s a cheap and lazy story, though, which is why it works. Where’s the immediate reward in encouraging things like self-discipline, intention, healthy adaptation, self-awareness, anxiety culture, negative social norms and personal responsibility."

WOW! big giga centrist omnipotance there b-
*collapse*