18+ Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Hobbyist media theorist. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
"I’ve had a growing frustration with the way AI skeptics, especially my comrades on the left, dismiss the likelihood of mass AI job replacement by pointing to quality problems that are both easily and affordably fixed.
Most creative jobs in the US aren’t making art that people care about. They’re making corporate slop that everyone hates, but which is necessary for doing business. The only people who will miss the human slop when it gets replaced with AI are the humans who used to get paid to make it."
Aaah, respect. Well, If it happens or not, have a look.
Listening to te the one and only Garth Marenghi's Bursted Earth. Or I could listen to Snoop Dog's voice read voices to me on Speechify. Which is more mediocre. Seth said it best with his own doomerism, anybody hustler stuff that he can use Stable Diffusion that's pretty alright, or the one and only illustrators he alludes to.
Or that, not rehortically, more convincingly. So that's his commodity fetishism and prestige. Magic and mysticism that can't be judges from the algorithm mindless data-landscape.
gambleor said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that Thunderf00t and Pat Condell happen to hold positions which broad brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny."
Principle, as radical ideas that have questionable roots and Polemics.
I apply it to this situation. Similar to the baseless polarizations and the increased amounts of dead-end intellectualisms. They should have bombed a data centre already, yet they are complaining on microblogging. It's
Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them. They are ultimately a non-event.
Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.
Listening and having my beliefs challenged, not by debate, yet by hearing those not of the main-road.
The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started the all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within
Tesla and Nfts have been telling you of such wild dismissals, and I can read to that and draw it into info and into knowledge. If you've been wilfully misinformed, they are either hustlers or a bad actor. Hustler, there's only so much time to get the information that's sensible, that's not some BuzzFeed article.
Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls Baby Leftism for lack of a better term, (I call it Wilfully misinformed) Has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.
Yes, that's why I've had to moderate my stance on this, focus on broad brushing polemics provided by the perverse incentives of direct response (Things getting more outrageous than they already get)
This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:
. Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient, It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out.
Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class petit boug) Yet here we are.
Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels Group? weird centrist oppourtunists like Ed Zotron, hello?)
Is this yet another reach via angry straight white men, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism!
Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
The clanker slur 'discourse' has yet become ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.
Cussy nsfw rant incoming. Befor all of this started, 11 years ago. It's going towards the same trajectory. The bubble on social media is so isolated and that preponderance of response rates aren't like that. Not even a criminologist, there, shooting themselves in the foot.
I must return to the rant since of the small scale bubble of social media ain't reflective of activism at large, since the thing ain't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaption, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.
We will have to foundherently adapt to this epistemic tech, for no epistemological is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaption we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. This second order effects.
So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with properity drm? Misrabalist nihilists with the class action lawsuit, ones of blind faith
When they bring it like this. Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul Supporters, and Mens right activists, that's my prediction.
If boycotts look like this, then it's going to yet another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.
I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right
Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it.
I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.
... This nsfw gag Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers.
No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?
Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?
Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.
(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)
As I try to have an opinion (no opinions allowed on Twitter, artist) of being reassembled rather than replaced.
Two Studys, One of the evidence on Reinstatement. Along with a working paper on Robots and firms I've read. So do entertain better ones before looking at microbloggers and anger there.
(That's the physicalism's way of testing, from literature to textbook. Learned that from bodybuilding.)
Alternative to the populist one that worlds going to end, merely because that elite class, ( Demographically Christian white men in the west, capacity qua capacity) going to control slightly less of it. With its token supporters.
That's one of my theories with labour markets being made anew, deproffesionalize and professionalizing of our cycle.
Here's a materialist/ideology interpretation of the AI with structuralism. As I learn the tenets to apply to my method of understanding the world of qualitive differences. Here's an hour of a book I'm getting. B-B-Bonus video
Hopefully nobody proselytizes with the doctrinaires. All the erotica about is vastly superior to that Business model. Welp,
Worst thing about copyright is reducing all ideologies of art into transacting a monopoly to a publisher, that's not art. That outcome ain't the top of the algorithm of our attention of all the hits (Although I do get it, otherwise it's the fire hose kind of situation.)
Gift economies (that don't exist.) Pro bono work (Professional stuff) and Alternative means of models that don't mean being subservient to reactionary capital. Copyright is the biggest defence of monopoly, so it's necessary that is hides behind it.
Some Bluesky posts I've been collecting..
Retweet @wwahammy.com· 3mo Copyright is the most anti-worker invention ever. It allows companies to demand writers do free work and then decide after the fact whether they want to pay for it. Lawyer> Meredith Rose @mrose.ink· 3mo COPYRIGHT IS NOT LABOR PROTECTION COPYRIGHT HAS BEEN ABSOLUTE DOG**** AS LABOR PROTECTION FOR THE LAST 400 YEARS PASS LABOR LAWS STOP ASKING COPYRIGHT TO FIX THE WORLD
Oh well, With a Fandom is that it's licensing malpractices with charity and other events, it's not something I'd like to flirt with. This video may sum it up, yet there's the amount of distrust to add to my reason of why am I not a gamer.
There's a continued insistence to enjoy toys and the pleasure principle.
This is what monopoly without anti-trust does to you folks, litigious malpractice.
This has been going for years with such a controversy. From the 1970's of the demonology of copyright. Twenty page document of lectures of the thoughts.
Beep Boop = Ai For any savvy reader out there, when I talk about it, within my microbloggers, I'm talking about it. I've to keep it low in case random aggro doomers come and nibble at
Since, its become a standstill of recursive doomerist. Ignore the news-headliners of ai being Jailbroken and come with me with my sources on knowing the beepity boopits.
Lump of cognition fallacy with the latest one here though, even though I enjoyed the definition of intelligence with less is more (Which is supposed to be a paradox btw.)
There, articulating theory's that better there, even the sceptics I felt like I learned something with intelligence being defined right now. Come and seek the new answers with a niche audience of about a bunch of llm/diffusion and creativity that ain't reflective within the bubble of social media.
Because it's ultimately, and most fundamentally inconsequential, those who beg for propriety drm and infinity of copyright trolls.
That's the positive aspects of ai. Biological pathogens being sorted along with the ways of lays being rigorously analysed, not seen and a foundation within discourse, only to test theories.
Really gives me hope, even though it's coming through anthropomorphic, well, I can converse now with capital. Big does not necessarily mean bad if it's governed well. We all can't be noble savages.
I'm a little ennui frankly, myself. Yet these layers of the onions are the self-described doomers.
Yet the idea of robot overlords getting bored as I skimmed through my the mathematics as entertainment made me interested, yet that tells something more about me than. It's by @jdp.extropian.net What about this, and Intermingling with the LLM engineers now because why not, This is what happens when a journalist does takes and even citizen journalisms.
Can't broad brush all believers at this rate.
Enjoy those links in the doomer examinations, because I'm not clicking em, to confess.
Oh, Fresh Episode of The last invention is here. I'll be putting these under the Beep_boop to show how much editorials I've done on AI. Clambering for certainty with opinions to how to find peace of mind.
I mean, bonus lecture at the risks and assessments of the risks, even the one I've done with psychosis one.
Beep boop, read my wires boy, read my robutt wires.
That's it! I'm reading a book because the copyright wingers using there existance on abolshing fair use are too much.
So I decided to try to get my moneys worth via reading research in this discovery of llms/diffusion models.
(Even if it's bad, I've read Ayn Rynd, is this comparable? Part of the writer's training! HOOOOOOOOOO!) Lets see how much this fascinates or tires me.
2023 Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick
I've changed my opinion
Starts with explanations of weights, and token prediction. Existential risk and ethics, lawsuits, Japan, ethics discussion. This if it's all a matter of understanding what the tech can do in terms of capabilities and incapabilities is going to really have to see through.
These four rules are his tenets that he elaborates on for a possible alternative with dealing with the tech, how people hide, how people use it, and what are the possible sci-fi futures that move along it. Here's his Ai Research blog.
I shall put him in the neutral AI category and better-reporting-that-Ed-Zetron-box. I'm going to keep his machine inferences under wraps.
Guess this is under the editorial because somebody having a nuanced take on machine learning is impossible now with this naughty journalist seeking those hot, HOT scoops! It's over-editorialised now, huzzah.
Phrenology, and you are the product with prosumer ai-detection.
Well, even with doctrinaires still madden me. Here's idea/expression dichotomy. The law does not protect genre, good one too. Idea's can't be selecting, they're collectively owned by the commons, and then there's the way that I'm going to happen. Expand the conception of copyright till it's impossible.
whenever someone suggests that a webtool can detect AI images, I do check them against: 1. a digital illustration 100% hand drawn by me 2. a photomanipulation created by me 3. a video game screenshot, unedited and taken by me so far, not a single "AI detector" has ever got 2 out of 3 correct that is WORSE THAN USELESS. "Determining which images have been created or altered with generative tools" isn't even a use case for gen-AI, somehow okay, well, that's your right, OP, but just so you know the linked tools were: wasitai.com [failed 1 and 3, correctly identified 2 as "not AI"] and thehive.ai/apis/ai-gene... [failed 2, said 3 "might include some AI elements", correctly identified 1 as "not AI"] usually I delete quote posts if the OP blocks me but I guess I'll let this one circulate, it's important to be aware of the limits of these apps. the best tool for detecting generated images and text is and remains: your human eyeballs. sorry
Magic bullet solutions
Video on educational applications.
Education industry complex, what are you going to do huh?
Rawwr Kyro is doing his ranting here with notes on Tech Journalism.(If you're new, check out my other notes on AI and licence in the search bar)
I must do this the strawman to feel carthesis to my audience. (image from Deja 98 Rom hack)
"MuH FREEDOMS'n HuSTle'n Propyright rights MICKY MOU-" (oh my, this have SIX FINGERS??)
CRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCNCCCNCN Free Palestine! (Thats the thing, ain't it? It's not so simple as a dunk tweet or a microblog post It merely entertainment right?)
Let me clear some conceptual confusion.
A little petering out with News, welcome to journalism. It could be going completely public domain as things go on. The denialism and copyright self abnegation a defeatist dead-end, especially with the copyright-lets-be-under-the-kind-monopoly-of-disneys/nintendo-content-id-drm sort. I feel like I'm talked down like a child by westy liberals.
As copyright there to consolidate the distribution into capital. @tentacle.expert
"SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"
Aaah doctrinaires'n the anarchists, what to do. Always leaning in the sympathy of the Anarchist. Nightmare, asymmetric enforcement. What will happen when DRM and the commodification of scraping by big content will do? Will I'm not affiliated with that union like Lenin was. Class character first.
Are people in for a rude awakening once this DRM is applied?
Also, ain't Eddy Zetron and his bubble narrative bogus? NFT =/= Prosumer Gen Ai. Well, I've never listened to him anyway. He's still wiggling Coe? Meh. ...
(Now that I thnk about it, encruddificaton seems more like a absurd concept, even when I wrote about it. My hypocrisy alarm bells of a contradictory axis are going off. The only thing he's doing this is for his self-service now.)
I'm using my right in the editorial that hes... infamous grifting. The nft/genai comparison has done so much damage to the discourse. I've written about
Oh, he's got a diaper burping fetish, at least with my entertainment I put it under the legalese that it's fiction. Guess he's still doing his rounds a corrupting the entertainment industry.
He's name-searching and sending petty malpractice insults. Why is he the prophet and gospel to anti-ai dogma?
I'm outta there! No more digital nobel savage. I'm the excavator.
Well visual media has its own drawbacks, cartoon discourse ain't conductive, and it ain't hiding the malpractice of the dog piles I'm seeing on Bluesky I don't know why I'd say this. I'm not going to answer the dismissive hustling, it's not for me. Such is a mob rule and the wilful disinformation now.
"Just let me work! Anything. Desperate. Make me silly mindless entertainment. Do whatever specification you want sire, anything to serve! I want job. I need to prescribe as-written instructions"
Texas sharpshooter Fallacy anyone with this discourse with the talking points refuted?Does microblogging facilitate it. It's why I don't post some of these blog posts there. The biggest danger is that the discourse and comprehension they are getting are from a meme, and that's the discourse now.
Twitter and bluesky have destroyed discourse so that's, why I try to limit myself, it's indulging in the techmonoplitic manipulations that Neil Postman warned about in amusing ourselves to death.
Please, denialism and hustle ain't going to answer this question west, expertise going to lead ahead. "It's boring and it will go away!" Nope. I learned with the NFT stuff that this stuff is still present.
Oh, Even now, it feels like excuses to hustle more.
Even with the crash, will it be lose-lose (that's how a doomerist views it, I take it as neutral continuously.)
This article goes into the prosumer, marketing terms design for direct response and says these are statistical inference.
Link on don't be a A**hole of impossible principle and ideals. By my reflection of this thread on Tumblr. Paternalistic inspiration P*** will not be tolerated within my platform.
(Oh, I look and try and digest takes) Such as this retweet. I don't retweet in bluesky because of the fickle followers. You are one of the good ones though, who can trust an editorial and an opinion and not a short, quippy and wrong dismissal. I'm entertaining Neil Postman's amusing ourselves to death when I'm using that format. @eleanor.lockhart.contact another thing people don't realize when they fantasize about "the AI crash" is that you're going to see a *lot* more slop and harmful use of AI whenever the big companies do crash, because the crash would drop GPU prices drastically & make cybercriminals etc. training models much, much cheaper"
Oh, that is an idea with all these marketing predictions, something to take account for a preparation.
According to this Test which I felt it was polarising and misrepresentative, I entertained it again. Did my own Ai-identity, which reflected my one and only position. You're free to take it.
Many takes on the thread. Another Typology as an intuition pump to understand this. Well, it's a Cartesian graph again of positioning marketers use.
Find myself in agreement to this.
Now as Anil Dash with his own decentralised AI models that are plural, is it forbidden of Green version? Remix culture'n all that I lean on.
He even linked to the video, antitrust leads to trust, I take it.
Welp, Good luck with that with Really Good AI. Kyro will do what he does, Squashinghe west military industry complex.
I'll prepare for a new doomerist movement. I'm not going to associate with this anti-vaxx that's left coded, it's malpractice. Not much vision for the future other than the eternal present. This will cause hijacking and destruction.
Key 🗝 🦊 @keytryer.net· 2d Current anti-technological trends have no imagination of what the world looks like after this. They want an eternal y2k and an artificial ban on computation. "It doesn't matter if you cure cancer, if no one can be a doctor anymore." It's bleak to me.
Unless we build an alternative.
There will be, as an antitrust egalitarian I propose a right to the city
oh look my EFF stickers have arrived
Regardless, the discourse has regressed on Bluesky. Thank you for reading my rant.
The show must go on, and the show must go on, and the show must go on.
Yet I know being a host I'm going to move one as with my own means.
Or should I do ruthless expose, revealing the truth, go for ideals? What is a host going to do when the issues hit close to home and you have to make a stand? All rhetorical.
Ideology, materialism. I can't understand call-outs these days within political action and then there are the entertainers who happen to dazzle away and do not care, yet with the creation of slop, with understand. Silly waves of attention, silly waves of attention.
Ah, This will never be a call-out, only a dismissal channel. Like I left Anita Sarkeesian, and others, I simply moved on with the push and pull of belief systems tugging me in different directions.
Entertaining hosts and an editorial call-out artist, an essayist who tries to make some better of the slop, With it although, they can only say that the show must go on. Welp, we are going to be living with provocateur bait and panic averages stuff.
Oh, and there's a link to the Clanker slur discourse, which is a silly hilly to die on. Yet another reason why some mis-foundherent ways of social media discourse can't be taken seriously. Despite the adultism, the discourse has got, naive, coarsened thanks to the media. Thanks internet. White people hijack everything.
"I don't want to die on this hill. I think this is hill is dumb. I don't even want to be on this hill. I don't think this hill should exist. I have just found it impossible to ignore."
""Presumably they imagine that this will only ever hurt people who are inordinately attached to technology. Unfortunately, disabled people tend to be extremely attached to technology, because they use it for their hearing aids, artificial limbs, and everything that lets them use a phone or computer" < (From @xanadian.bsky.social)
In attempt to develop an opinion of NFTs, couch Gregor does his research.
(This whimsical, low effort doodle is the only positive thing, other the thing at the end.)
(CW, abuse, slurs. And terminally online xwitterism Twitter artists used as a derogatory slur. )
A speculative, volatile market, it's marketing that Seth Godin has dismissed. ( Yet there are contradictory sources, had to check the Wayback Machine. It's an editorial, though, So I'll make my mind up. It seems more incoherent now )
I like it when I test my ideological presuppositions challenged
Welp, what were my experiences?
I was off, playing and depressed with League of Legends before this fad or not.
Yet things change, don't they?
Short version. Even it hinted at the climate thing that I'm considering. Oh, look it's more death threats, look, if you retweet and post death threats. I'm going to treat you as a mere acquaintance. It's not within my entertainment etiquette.
Bullying, doxing, suicide, wow, thanks I avoided the liberal circle and have not spent my days there.
Well, putting this account here, if you don't want to look at the full essay, I've been at it.
Here's him getting sidetracked on xwitter drama, it's amazing on YouTube you can post so much xwitter drama now. Unlearning has done a Sowell now, which this libertarian with this time.
You don't even have to agree, yet he political convenience talking points that a propped as a means of twitter statecraft authority and response rates, No thank you, Dan, You were wrong here, empirically I'll have gone with experience.
Oh look, the obituary list so I guess it ain't dead. Where Micrological artists can continue to have a nice pint in the pub and wait for this to all blow over.
Yeah, he's right wing he admits, and a libertarian ancap (urgh did I admit to something along with lines of agreement, what a strange world) yet death threats? Sexual assault? Seriously, please. Please 😫 No more of that crud. On an advertising platform. An Advertising blog, panopticon made crazy.
The claims of environmental are similar, hmm.
So I decided to extend an olive branch, since there have been a movement towards cryptography with this technology, there's going to have to be another way to understand are foundherent conceptions of property rights. It cannot wait.
There's this guy who's got a Brian L Fyre papers, which are free to read. I enjoyed his comments on Marx being a literary landlord. Examining the contradictions within property laws, I do like to see it. As somebody who believes in the withering with creative commons laws, good on you. Cannot comment on the NFT open sea thing, though.
That why I disagree with Philosophy tube's saying with those statements with AI, of investment, if that's such a broad definition, this is a statement of investment. With my Ko-fi
All return of investments are connected with freedom to access to freedom to choose. Or why I don't go on twitter artist.
Phew! That's a lotta links, (I don't expect you to click on them all, I'm still learning to direct response after all.)
Nope, I don't think this covers psychosis, it's reminding me of the way atheists accused theists that they are crazy. This was refuted, and it's not going to happen. The insane asylum ain't coming back.
No no no, let's not try and bring the insane asylum back. With the method being in the madness. Enforced madness that target vulnerable groups is a no- go.
Criminalising the users, while also treating the medium of this as a thing with autonomy, it ain't.
Moving past of the Victorian insanity accusations, we are to make it our pursuit to see how we can decipher and see mental illness and disability as a thing to go with, and that means AI too. I could point out a bunch of men and suits with money as a bunch of freaks, yet that does not go to the heart of ideological and material conditions. It's going to get unhistorical.
Eschatology, End times have been with us all this passages, Yet's that associated with all cults like Scientology and bebops comet. Including, I must say, Atheism science fiction.
Post edit, Peter coffin did a video on it.
(Not an endorsement, he may have used AI in the thumbnail, this is an Editorial ON ai, not endorsement, that speaks more of your epistemology if you see it that way. )
Hmm, so they are going to attempt to make it a felony again with another moral blame parade, I know they were caviller with the training. Not like this, here's a retweet.
"I dunno, when you start blaming OpenAI because unwell people did unwell people things, filing massive lawsuits, and waging ap press campaign, this seems the entirely predictable course correction. You wanted guardrails to ensure mentally ill people can't encounter harmful output, now you got it. Ari Cohn @aricohn.com· 2mo I don't want OpenAI scanning conversations and calling the police either, but when you say AI companies should face massive liability when anyone gets hurt, you're asking for the most extreme, CYA results. That's what happens, and has always happened, when you make policy with the plaintiffs' bar."
Guess they need not go scorched earth policy on this. This reminds me of this opinion
