We can't escape the commodity relations.
What a show that will others believe they're owed entertainment. Owed amusement, owed kiddie pool play.Such is a means that will never end, of large waves of attention economies that will move in and out with much whimsy.
Fame, Infamy, and Attention Economising. It all happens at once, performance metric emergences shake like winds. Commercial platforms yearn for it, long for it, and call for it.
Now, I shall quote, as we go through these circles, and waves. To what we call the tautological summoning of algorithm
"One of the worst things that can happen to an artist is becoming unintentionaly famous on the internet. Nobody is in control of it, and when it occurs, it’s a completely destructive force that endangers you and your work due to the nature of the majority of people online. The macro-level behaviour of social media is sick and twisted and directly/indirectly pursues the suffering and torment of others as entertainment. It doesn't seem to matter if you “embrace” momentary celebrity or not. It will punish you, hunt you, grift off you, and make up stories about you regardless. There is a sense of entitlement from the viewer that they are owed entertainment constantly from you. That all work you do is immediately “open source”, available to anyone, and ready to make a buck off of. Any rejection of this is considered elitist and antisocial, and the acceptance is considered “selling out”. You can’t win, and in general, nobody I know that has had the spotlight thrown on them really wants that. We all know it’s horrible."
Either you lean out as a novelist or lean in as a hackneyed ghostwriter/hack. I can go on and on, even though this line can be blury as our material conditions differ.
I don't think I can argue better with the reality of a macro sociological activity. Even as a micro or meso level. A pluralistic phemnomon of many minds that don't want to be interupted with social interaction. With that account, this cool-hunting from anti-elite elitism will always be held under the spectacle of hyper-measurement.
These commodity relations are the reality that we have to deal with; it respects us or it does not.
(Bonus, Kyles Video on aesthetic elitism auteur theory and vulgar auterism) It became to new norm. Ain't this the circle of commodity fetishism?
I don't think I can argue better with the reality of a macro sociological activity. Even as a micro or meso level. A pluralistic phemnomon of many minds that don't want to be interupted with social interaction. With that account, this cool-hunting from anti-elite elitism will always be held under the spectacle of hyper-measurement.
These commodity relations are the reality that we have to deal with; it respects us or it does not.
He said that being hack does not invalidate being an artist. Hmm, thinking about The Great Gatsby writer being a copywriter and Shakespeare doing lewd crowd-pleasers. Along with Hemingway being a mass communicator in journalism.
Teleologically hackneyed membership is entertainment, and the ontological origins before is are the artistic origins. To the cognisance of social actualisation, we trust. For a good's and services to ascension.
Teleologically hackneyed membership is entertainment, and the ontological origins before is are the artistic origins. To the cognisance of social actualisation, we trust. For a good's and services to ascension.
(Bonus, Kyles Video on aesthetic elitism auteur theory and vulgar auterism) It became to new norm. Ain't this the circle of commodity fetishism?
Wow, "Don't act like a celebrity till you're succesful" It undergo's our IP structure of our intellectual performances that lay here.