CYA if the coperate and compete

A leader will have a large structure to deal with the riffraff below. Not being able to deal with the eristics far away.

Too abstract to doodle properly

So, cover your ___ (not cussing). A flippant way of dealing with the bottom up conception.

Yet, with. Commercial firms and their claimed tyranny, who has the conditions of rule again?

These are structures, after all, benchmark here and an little ideal standsrd there of a team trying to cooperate rather than compete. Founded or unfounded.

So it is on the microscale of a freelancer.

Thinking about the all there is fallacy or micro-reductions of a industry that it can do.

Can I have some otium?

Back at it again with the classical labour theory of value

Carenedes attempting to the a typology of work, even though art cannot fall under industrialised white collar work. More like Sport and play, will be keeping track. IDK what he'll say with beep_Boop

How to Read Like a Parasite by Daniel Tutt.

Resentment and otium of the aristocratic class.

This not a dive of an aristocrat or a nilosophy (Ni as in hate)

Yet with such concepts, there's a thing with resentment and the eternal return, which are conservative concepts that have made me think of the literature that I'm trying to reconcile and understand. They may have crept up; this document attempts to rehabilitate while also being western Marxism to a modern conception with Daniel Tutt bringing in other authorities like Byung-Chul Han.

With the attempt to bring the concepts on his YouTube channel and make it a thesis of trying to exploit the little niches of his thought and cynicism that was brought with meaning of religion, morality and all that jazz of not know his attempts with his past. With me listening to the conception of animosity that is made flesh.

I don't know if any of Nietzsche or as they call him an physcopath can be attached today, yet this was insightful. 4.5 stars.

Mimicking high status. Critique of Status'n Immiseration

Where's the class distinction?

Well, this is tackling the Varn vlog on various arguments of signifiers. Leading to preferentialism of informal groups online, with digitized interactions of various belongings.

That the middle class and the managerial class lead into that off of status mimicking of higher classes to lead the development of infrastructure and of commercial law that will lead into that.

For such, though, the code of conduct such dialectics brought of oneself of the commercial law contingent, either of the desires of reaching an infinite moreness or the infinite desire to follow through with them. For this unmeasurable, non-physical infinity, the desire to fill an emptiness of lack is brought to lead into circles.

Circles of sharing. Circles of shaming, Circles of honour. (got poetic at the end)

Video in question. Got a lot on my mind right now.

Utility = outcome deon = Intrinsic justness

Is this a call to action to become the editors of all non-mediocrity, or am I trying to interpret it? Yet with the neoliberal paranoia, it looks like this interpretation may not last.

It was all an overview of the course of an art lawyer.

So is the social media machine of advertising revenue of commodification and all that manner of commercial law that it will lead into?

I'm dipping back into Bryan's files and papers again with social sciences; he's trying to argue for the moral philosophy. Being a lawyer, it's his job. Browsing online, with it are all the ways of stochastic gradient descent. Aligning with and heightening of the commodity relations within sociology.

A blank slate, although not reflective of the equilibrium of epigenetic distribution of each and every telonomy of the enabling constraints and biomechanics, can lead to governance away from heriditarian authority. Or aristocratic, exceptional pretensions.

Wow, that's avoiding eugenics here in regard to judgement and police formation.

Diapolemic of the self

Ah, such a keep with a non-self to the connectedness of the other, within unison of the manners.

Well, according to the Buddha's teachings in this post.

Well, can this lead to a foundherent way of epistemologically viewing the essence of the relational to abstract infinity?

To such as the strange thought of the self being a sociological and psychological part of us onto others, interpelling metaphysics into new ideas. This department of the self into the other, which will form the relationalism with our own sociological constraints based on.

Well, beyond fair-weather mutuals, that is.

Ip demands an egoist view

One reason that I'm deflationary is the worship of knowledge that can lead into elitism.

Well, snobbery and self-assurance that I can't trust, not even myself, to seek to own up to any mediocrity along with complacency.

That's seeing any advancement of epistemology, or it's not that deep. Anyway, another unsolicited advice video.

Oneric reassurance,

Minimalist and unrelated

New word.

Oneritainment

Dream-like otherness of being absorbed into the governance of fictional pretension.

That's what I've written, or the masses. They merely exist with their well-measured tautologies of irenic disquiet.

Slopulism, Populism, Poptism

Such are the terms of commodity consumption as of today and that line of mediocrity that is aspired to out of dejournment and recuperation, cycle out of cycle. Then there is a layer of that, the psychoanalysis of attempting to read for the hegemonic lands.

Such is fair use/fair dealing with it, leading into reflections that lead into new culture, a new feedback loop.

Some are at peace, some at war.

We will never hear the end of it.

Production status quo ante freedom

 

This oneirophilia of our commodity relations, huh? Escapism for mental health.

The banality of diapolemics

So he is stuck, within statsis of all things that happen to bring him the torture of the cogs of the lands of wanting to be a anti-woke YouTuber nitpicking pop media's nitpicks.

The pundits have beeing going back and forth, I happen to this

It got me thinking of this link, of tackling infamous pundits for the sake of it.

Or the saying comes with the commodity relations to our intangible, qualitative attention.

🛋💭

Oh dear, we've reached the bipartisan hacksmanship of our entertainment nexus, pundits and PowerPoint punditry.

To what extent will these continue with this micro medium of the attention imperative? Everybody, to some extent, is copywriting and advertising to some extent in a contract propertrian.

Do self-defeats matters?

Pedantic consistencies that make way for intellectual victory and self-defeats; not all self-defeats matter, only the most foundherent ones.

According to the way of saying so, when hornets' nests are kicked, when the direct accusations hit and the hunting gets under one's own skin.

Yet, with the masses, they do seem to matter. From mob rule to normalised good ideas, they do exist all the time, with no adultism or condescension.

The only way is to move through and see if all that little points build together.

(Of course, with litigations. The coherency and consistency matter more there.)

Cruelly Eliminativeist and cruely Empiricist

look at all that logic and physics of what some may call business. if there is a physics to business, there is none in the qualitative side, or the burnt embers

Why I'm against it: it's not fun not having beliefs and sensations.

Crafting crafter of craft. Rather than the unique one. To the way that the origins of things aren't unique.

All that scientism is any ideological commitment and an attempt at universal appeal. Mindset of a production boolean value.

A job of bean counting. A job is a measure of the sunk cost of wrong measurement, of Pavlovian frameworks circulating into themselves.

Such is the status of old money and cool money.

Negligent Craft

The fictional legelese, of it's respect.

 When one can be negliglent to the craft that can't be made.

What does one do? Interact with the the world that's outside ones own imagination?

All the imaginings of another world what it's mean to feal an entertained possibility of non-material becoming, and with that state of entertainment, there's a moment of understanding of another world granted by the vision of the author, into a door of communication of another mind.

Well, telepathy, even with the misreadings and the misinterpretations.

It's all worth it to be part of a society that's made our culture.

Dignify bad artifice of the entertainment argument.

It's the manipulation behind it.

can't simply be

When not playing a character of virtue or pleasure. Reductionistic or holistic.

Deontological for searching for a truth comes.

Then the duty will come for it.

To serve and follow along with others within hermeneutic circles with their shared interpellations and ideological patterns.

With that obligation unbinding, natural organisms cooperate together.

You must come to comprehension with ethics, of utilitarianism, deontology, and even virtue; that's important for any student wanting to understand the humanity that's been built.

Deon in legalism, Utility in vegan ethics, and virtue within wellness/self-help entertainment.

w specification of spectacle

Winners

Those who fight

Those who dance

Those who clash

Those who smack

Those who Slap

Those who Spectacle

Fictional transcendence comes at a price, the act of dominion of affliation become and new industry

(Reading Guy Debord, will get back up)

Double lifes

The pornographic libertine Epithumos, and erotics of art.

merely post a transactional porn of sexual capital, Thanks 1dime, that's entertainment clerkism and that's all that bean-counting does. Oh well, It's like I'm taking part of that with my own typing and production of illustrations, gracing amongst commoditised, conventionalised norms of social media, yet it's a matter of understanding and being aware of it.

To create a double life of a jerk-off bubble.

Then there are the other curational accounts that are not straight up porn which help create culture, and they are helpful too; the sfw ones that do it about sensation and the phonomological account of one significant curator of freelance curation can add taste and direction to the culture that nurtures it.

Or the intellectual curated

Directly polemical, not apologising.

This may be where the satirists and direct market happen with demand and the react streamers who happen to move towards the amount of ideological driving and various positions.

As a sociologist, one mus curate that too.

Techne = art Episteme = science Conventions = law/governance

memory

 Aristotle, well well. Bring the insight of ethics from the past, as over social media not needed.

Small strpping stones of the past, of wisdom interpreted to bring into modernity.

From the past, there are lessons and solutions found.

From Community of Practice. Fighting the tension of commodity. Then of conventions of status informed by the epistme of hard sciences, to our softer social sciences and softer aesthetics.

So with this scaffolding, he brought the hammer down and caused many generations to discourse your come.

Byung First Impressions

Ironically, he ls the one to find merit in the term of entertainment, cogntaintment, and allotainment. Attainment that's required fore social interaction of the signifiers.

The Disappearance of Rituals

Good entertainment

Agony or Eros

Reaching out, for profit, to the non-profit affairs. With the ethics here being all up for interruption advertising with the status grooming and such. From the internal/attainment being from the dualistic that commercialised from advertising, and holistically defined within philosophy. Within such a matter, I'm not sure such rhetoric of porn going to be fully in light.

Should not point at Foucault. Oh well, I'm going to have to get a book for that one.

Chuck Palunuik's Snuff has an argument for the perverse incentives of the sex industry.

Slop as meaningless concept

Thinking about mediocrity, along with the meritocracys associated with.

What is a slop?🛋🥣❔

#couchgregorblog #editorial

@Demigurlboss

"AI slop is a meaningless concept. It's not any more slop because it's AI, and the slop churn was going long before AI hit the scene. It's burying a thousand ledes so you can hop on an uncritical superiority bandwagon instead of acknowledging the impact of perverse incentives on social media and art.

IMHO, slop is something designed primarily with the aim of hitting an algorithmic feed and getting as many views and shares as possible. The point of slop is to get views because views equal money. It's something made for the sole purpose of exploiting social media payouts with minimum effort."

Nioce. Fast and cheap, the hackney'd lane comes around, even I entertain it with its tradition. It's where IP lies.

The perverse incentives, deserves to be placed here.

Drawing from memory.

Professionalism = Celebrity

Or a nicely to think of entertainment and private equity. From the Lila novel before it got overwritten, another to think of status. Or, well, ways of it hitting our attainment.

Such is, the passion of a matter, of industries norms of serving a customer with expectations and promises. Of qualitative differences.

That is assigned in an order of direction, if alignment of follows.

Celebrate, to keep serious and public. Etymology.

Then with this procession we get either scarcity or connection. From Formal governmental rankings to informal friend groups.