The banality of diapolemics

So he is stuck, within statsis of all things that happen to bring him the torture of the cogs of the lands of wanting to be a anti-woke YouTuber nitpicking pop media's nitpicks.

The pundits have beeing going back and forth, I happen to this

It got me thinking of this link, of tackling infamous pundits for the sake of it.

Or the saying comes with the commodity relations to our intangible, qualitative attention.

🛋💭

Oh dear, we've reached the bipartisan hacksmanship of our entertainment nexus, pundits and PowerPoint punditry.

To what extent will these continue with this micro medium of the attention imperative? Everybody, to some extent, is copywriting and advertising to some extent in a contract propertrian.

Do self-defeats matters?

Pedantic consistencies that make way for intellectual victory and self-defeats; not all self-defeats matter, only the most foundherent ones.

According to the way of saying so, when hornets' nests are kicked, when the direct accusations hit and the hunting gets under one's own skin.

Yet, with the masses, they do seem to matter. From mob rule to normalised good ideas, they do exist all the time, with no adultism or condescension.

The only way is to move through and see if all that little points build together.

(Of course, with litigations. The coherency and consistency matter more there.)

Cruelly Eliminativeist and cruely Empiricist

look at all that logic and physics of what some may call business. if there is a physics to business, there is none in the qualitative side, or the burnt embers

Why I'm against it: it's not fun not having beliefs and sensations.

Crafting crafter of craft. Rather than the unique one. To the way that the origins of things aren't unique.

All that scientism is any ideological commitment and an attempt at universal appeal. Mindset of a production boolean value.

A job of bean counting. A job is a measure of the sunk cost of wrong measurement, of Pavlovian frameworks circulating into themselves.

Such is the status of old money and cool money.

Negligent Craft

The fictional legelese, of it's respect.

 When one can be negliglent to the craft that can't be made.

What does one do? Interact with the the world that's outside ones own imagination?

All the imaginings of another world what it's mean to feal an entertained possibility of non-material becoming, and with that state of entertainment, there's a moment of understanding of another world granted by the vision of the author, into a door of communication of another mind.

Well, telepathy, even with the misreadings and the misinterpretations.

It's all worth it to be part of a society that's made our culture.

Dignify bad artifice of the entertainment argument.

It's the manipulation behind it.

can't simply be

When not playing a character of virtue or pleasure. Reductionistic or holistic.

Deontological for searching for a truth comes.

Then the duty will come for it.

To serve and follow along with others within hermeneutic circles with their shared interpellations and ideological patterns.

With that obligation unbinding, natural organisms cooperate together.

You must come to comprehension with ethics, of utilitarianism, deontology, and even virtue; that's important for any student wanting to understand the humanity that's been built.

Deon in legalism, Utility in vegan ethics, and virtue within wellness/self-help entertainment.

w specification of spectacle

Winners

Those who fight

Those who dance

Those who clash

Those who smack

Those who Slap

Those who Spectacle

Fictional transcendence comes at a price, the act of dominion of affliation become and new industry

(Reading Guy Debord, will get back up)

Double lifes

The pornographic libertine Epithumos, and erotics of art.

merely post a transactional porn of sexual capital, Thanks 1dime, that's entertainment clerkism and that's all that bean-counting does. Oh well, It's like I'm taking part of that with my own typing and production of illustrations, gracing amongst commoditised, conventionalised norms of social media, yet it's a matter of understanding and being aware of it.

To create a double life of a jerk-off bubble.

Then there are the other curational accounts that are not straight up porn which help create culture, and they are helpful too; the sfw ones that do it about sensation and the phonomological account of one significant curator of freelance curation can add taste and direction to the culture that nurtures it.

Or the intellectual curated

Directly polemical, not apologising.

This may be where the satirists and direct market happen with demand and the react streamers who happen to move towards the amount of ideological driving and various positions.

As a sociologist, one mus curate that too.

Techne = art Episteme = science Conventions = law/governance

memory

 Aristotle, well well. Bring the insight of ethics from the past, as over social media not needed.

Small strpping stones of the past, of wisdom interpreted to bring into modernity.

From the past, there are lessons and solutions found.

From Community of Practice. Fighting the tension of commodity. Then of conventions of status informed by the epistme of hard sciences, to our softer social sciences and softer aesthetics.

So with this scaffolding, he brought the hammer down and caused many generations to discourse your come.

Byung First Impressions

Ironically, he ls the one to find merit in the term of entertainment, cogntaintment, and allotainment. Attainment that's required fore social interaction of the signifiers.

The Disappearance of Rituals

Good entertainment

Agony or Eros

Reaching out, for profit, to the non-profit affairs. With the ethics here being all up for interruption advertising with the status grooming and such. From the internal/attainment being from the dualistic that commercialised from advertising, and holistically defined within philosophy. Within such a matter, I'm not sure such rhetoric of porn going to be fully in light.

Should not point at Foucault. Oh well, I'm going to have to get a book for that one.

Chuck Palunuik's Snuff has an argument for the perverse incentives of the sex industry.

Slop as meaningless concept

Thinking about mediocrity, along with the meritocracys associated with.

What is a slop?🛋🥣❔

#couchgregorblog #editorial

@Demigurlboss

"AI slop is a meaningless concept. It's not any more slop because it's AI, and the slop churn was going long before AI hit the scene. It's burying a thousand ledes so you can hop on an uncritical superiority bandwagon instead of acknowledging the impact of perverse incentives on social media and art.

IMHO, slop is something designed primarily with the aim of hitting an algorithmic feed and getting as many views and shares as possible. The point of slop is to get views because views equal money. It's something made for the sole purpose of exploiting social media payouts with minimum effort."

Nioce. Fast and cheap, the hackney'd lane comes around, even I entertain it with its tradition. It's where IP lies.

The perverse incentives, deserves to be placed here.

Drawing from memory.

Professionalism = Celebrity

Or a nicely to think of entertainment and private equity. From the Lila novel before it got overwritten, another to think of status. Or, well, ways of it hitting our attainment.

Such is, the passion of a matter, of industries norms of serving a customer with expectations and promises. Of qualitative differences.

That is assigned in an order of direction, if alignment of follows.

Celebrate, to keep serious and public. Etymology.

Then with this procession we get either scarcity or connection. From Formal governmental rankings to informal friend groups.

Hypocritical realist

Hypocrite is to play and to act, to put a double standard up under a suspension of disbeleif. Under such a generous skeptic he can view the illusion under such a pretense of the impressario whim.

From. The book cover of literary genre expectations, obligatory scene and sequences of thoughts playing out.

With fictional viel gone, the liar is exposed.

So, the legelese is necessary.

The popular vibes around the personal space

Vibes, or the smaller reaches of the terminally online. When it comes to the masses, It's indicative to note one's own influence and whether it's important to be of governance.

"Don't act like a celebrity if you ain't successful"

I think of the Ernie bush miller quote, is that me being a silly newbie or a ponderer of the direct response and luck outside my affairs.

Best to check and be responsible for the epistemic bubble, along with the personal space of control.

will to nothingsness/ Thoughts on Neitzhe Anti-humanism

 Right-o, going through the emancipation study groups, where the times.

First impressions, of the folk version. (Unreaded, unclambering my thoughts)

He's grappling with the aristocrat condition, the sociologists are trying to reverse engineer, some say he inspired the Nazis, some not.

Ubermensch : Do you mean role models, we see value in there teleology? Of internal/external states? That concepts valuable.

There could have been an article connecting him more, others call him empathyless, was he a hack?

Well, cynical non-hack, although his vision brings that of a rugged onlooker. Resentment concept will look like the one that sticks.

This is what they tried to salvage in terms of his style though.

Biting-in-the-wind cynicism. From the death of fanaticism of theism to his moustache.

The podcast in question, He will eventually be left and dismissed, it's always nioce to see.

John S Burges on Prosumerism visual

 https://www.themarginalian.org/2012/09/28/ways-of-seeing-john-berger/

Media may be a low influence, it's trying to get through with licensing monopoly worship.

Well, it all started and still hangs high within the art world, between the hackneyed commercial and the romantic literary.

A publicity picture, showing envy of to consume. With the motivators, with the Fear, exclusivity guilt, greed, need for approval, convenience and pleasure.

There it goes, with the visual, of publicity, of glamour. That's what the ways of living, or the dejourement of the hustle trance.

It can feel like this, even.

Well, we are in the society we are.

Nakedly easy-to-read relations

Are they pretending to hide their relationalism of the metrics,

Little office clerks, working and quietly, not saying the loud part out loud. Everybody is gaming a kind of metric relationalism, or are they in unison of this mawkish pleasure principle, or this satisfaction of teleology of desire?

Everybody has it, the pretensions of acting normal that this relationalism of direct response metrics that let us understand each other's status, status is always relationalism, scarce powers that shim and shimmer amongst the waves of our streams of consciousness that show priorities of importance that guide the intuitions, and into the structure of friends and enemies, attractions and repulsions. Even the complex rationalisations that will be justified.

All for the point, for that sweet, sweet interruption of monetised ads.

Right between the points. Between the relations.

I look back at this media theory By seth, Then wonder.

( Worth another relink )

Sapiosexual/Demisexual

Cognition and Emotional.

Logos and Eros.

Expression of Philosophy/intellectual cogency and the emotional bonding of intuitions.

Such is a manner of identifying with the continuing expansion of the taxonomy of sexual attractions towards understanding the performance of self.

With that, that merely shows that with the commodifying of community and queer theory with the expression with of ones own sexual identity is a manner of understanding if any of these labels serve, I'm lurking again within more of the ethics of substack, and it's a matter of time to understand new ways to talk with others.

There are a lot of images, either generated or and I'm getting less phased to condemn or endorse, it simply exists.

Thanks queer theorists, thanks non-elitist philosophers. They still keep asking questions and non-questions. Until I go back to work.

Here's a really cussy edutainment piece, with functional philosophy definitions btw, relinking it.

Status and Culture

 

Even out of the bounds of our epistemic enterprise of our academia, the main road's status motivations, and incentives still persists.

" Everybody is fishing for status, let nobody tell you otherwise " some Dragon Odendo, altered quote, probably. Well, Transcend, for that matter. By junction of there engagement. Social is the proceeding semiotic of economic, that's made of exchange value and set - price. Price, meant to stop haggling by the Quakers.

After the price and the exchange, there's the use value of the physics and mechanics of the things produced, artisan craft on the things of those who own their conditions of labour.

So Status, Rigour (sometimes that happens in academia, to and not.) Pretending not what other people do.

Status is a invisible ruler that effect to our micro decisions. From scarcity, to our abundance.

Other concepts i picked up 🛋📖 ( from the status book, author comes from fashiony background. )

Kitsch/Avant garde distinction

Epigone, in art of imitation, Exemplar by Immanuel Kant

Newmania:

Seeking the new cool thing on microblogs.

New = not exactly better, since to desire to see new entertainments via media.

Hysterisus :

Lagging behind in Greek, etymology. Used to describe another phenomena of trends in the data.

That's personal definitions n note. Possible to change.

Quite the sensation of how it's organised, with it being abstract of s

Second order effects / Human rights / List of Philosophy

Oops, social media all status roles, I must return to be academical shell and see if I can see enlightenment.

This is my Ecosia gamification stats, by the way, that's positive externalities.

 That's the alternative of Consequentialism.

Categorical. Be it with opinion of citizens, or enforcement of institutions.

Oh, Oh will be putting this from emancipations  For current marxist academic theory, well, it's got plenty of podcasts and others.

Whatever the intention falls. Does not matter to a consequent along with it's spreadsheets.

I got this from this philosophy list, that's a load thing to add to a list or not. For beginners/intermediates wanting a refresher of the moral principles.

Is this too western, though, too American? Welp, Other than open university, beats having a wrong microblogging education.

The perks of obscurity

It's all a blur, so many little content curation and moderation being what is sold, all in an expanding universe of vendors and suppliers with all their advertising, all a blur, all the fandom/hatedom, all the time, all of it was going in a blur of media heads down the way.

Academics are avoiding xwitter, or microblogs, some of them are in substack, they are going there, I found a good post on obscurity.

Since it's all datum, observable of the lowest stratum of comprehension, the scientific, and the narrative of this is to study, or when with a monopoly/monopsony of attention. Fame/infamy explains the entitlement complex of status value and cultural capital.


There's little attention. No data for interupption advertising.

No Ruthless expose industry complex, the need to make dramatic fiction to draw attention.

Thousands of merchandise, gone.

Fan fictions all around. Shippers, and all that.

No Status value to follow.

Cherish this moment while it lasts, I trust you, don't I?

( Oh, I've still have to learn to do a sales call, and a payment specification. )

What did Zig Ziglar, a conflict avoider, says with the data generality and a meaningful specific? Or, a semiotic specific in a chain.