Using the pretentions of labor protection horrible things

 That Sarah Case was like react world in a fancier package, enough racketeering.

Conciousness, the beep boop documentary, into the rabbit_hole

My oddest radical opinion on augmentative consciousness. (Completely interpretationist and have disagreements and falsifiability with that Karl Popperian jazz.) Not suited for microbloggers

Wow.

Do they even think of these questions on the highway road of microbloggers? 

This documentary.

Commit to anatta (Buddha non-self) with all presuppositions wiped clean.

Then watch. You know where I am.

Why, with the crop of free Beep_boop documentaries, there are more to choose from with all these questions. I doubt the commodity hustler outside here will have the time to understand that question. They are in their own circles of relations.

Even when it blames 

These questions of absolute epistemic certainty with consciousness require serious thought, though, and it's bled into my artwork.

Even when I don't directly use it

Has anyone seriously thought of consciousness before?

Still updating my main essay investigation

Spellings applied; I've been on Substack and rabbit holes like a veteran. 🛋🌃

with more doodle-core gags. Despite the fact they may hate this as well. No winning from proprietarian dominion, I suppose.

 Memetic a go go for curiosity bait..

For my hobby, critical theory? I got two pieces of feedback from literature/sociology. That's cool. Getting disquistions and essaykins back. Including the bottom right.

Free read > 🛋👉 3rd version off you can see the bottom right of all the indie knowledge work. Sceptics are welcome except for propertarians.

I'm still working on version 3, so other feedback and second opinions are welcome.

If I can't deliver the impact in video essay format on YouTube, then I'll be alright here. It's not like the reach there may be shared.

So bye-bye, propertarians! 👏🛋 Not falling down that rabbit hole. Will help guide those who are interested.

Oh, looking at me?? I'm merely a couch himbo thinking this out! 🛋👈⭐

Convienient eristics heuristics; The Commercial metrology trap

Once you see algorithms develop, you'll see how they think, through philosophy of mind.

You cannot unsee.

There monotizing meterolgy. The connectionism, then the grissere of a metaphysical labour, to the unpaid labor.

Prosumer metrology: On the The Eye Of the Master.

Even with the general intelligence being a category error, I'll give you that. That's a good examination of the Beep Boop using the labour theory of value that's within good faith.

We know it's eliminative all the way down with funnel metrics, and the e-begging and the coherency are brought and sought by many minds.

Yet what of the experience of Taylorism and measurement of the manner in which the mindset is employed? The meaning completely changes within the connectionism of the market, which is already a generalised construct within the internet, and which you participate in.

It's abstraction, an abstraction of our labour for all your labour lovers out there.

Well done for blowing my mind with the grissiere and abstract labour, from which we build ideas from the corpus of knowledge that we dialectically, positively and negatively construe of the dreams of the perceptron and all these mechanical terms that make your living mind think.

Yet a dialect aside, even a negative dialectic (as the Frankfurters would go) will happen to go.

Oh how our internet has made us into commodified communities as a mentally salient sorting mechanism in order not to lose ourselves from the delusion, even beyond the general intelligence as it's defined now.

It's specialised ain't it? Apart from that disagreement, five stars.

Woke 2 ain't happening, back to traditional queer theory.

 No, I'm not part of it, outgrown my 20's now.

Yet there those eho do anti-social , elitist, or selling out of criticsl theory.

Oh, 1dime on anti-social adventurism ain't praxis. Theres alsi refutations too such as the cubs gay marches as queer theory advocates who go for there rights. Yet this is the problem of perect coherency, its always messy, sometime obscure, somtimes obvious.

Case by case.

Guess with the campism, then theres no perfect coherency, as with social media, as with the ways llms effect us.

That's what it takes to be a sociologistp

On Classifiers

I see their use is more common now.

Peeps are paranoid about commodification; these are the algorithms and heuristics which linguistics has toppled too. And now they're checking through this. This has been checked adversarially, intuitively and counter-intuitively through a Socratic construction, with some autocomplete along with some other thoughts.

Pangram and others don't work. Or the self-abnegation of personal responsibility. Shall I quote?

Anyhow, here are two articles on why they are not to be trusted. Oh yeah, did I tell you the classifiers don't work in and of themselves? Well, you are the product. More on the math here.

Wow, look at that math.

Including a linguistic lesson on negative construction.

“It's not X. It's why” is a linguistic construction, more specifically, a “contrastive negation followed by a corrective assertion.” It's part of a rich “grammatical context for negated restrictives in English.” Olli O. Silvennoinen wrote an entire doctoral dissertation of 131 pages on contrastive negation.

Other the times, I won't ad hominion him on other bad essays.

Since this is continue with Sam Illingsworth's notes, the bias of these.

"Even a perfect detector would be the wrong tool

Now grant the impossible. Imagine a detector that worked flawlessly tomorrow.

I would still argue against it, for a reason that has nothing to do with accuracy.

The moment you put a detector between a teacher and a student, you change what a teacher is. You turn an educator into a police officer. The work of teaching is to be a co-creator of knowledge alongside the student, beside them while they struggle toward understanding. A detector makes suspicion the default setting. Every essay arrives presumed guilty.

That is not the job I signed up for. I did not become an educator to run my students’ words through a lie detector and wait for a number.

The evidence backs the instinct. I read every public UK university AI policy I could find, 96 of them, for a HEPI policy note this year. On a close reading of a sample, the language of education sat over an architecture of detection and surveillance. And two in five universities had no public AI policy at all. The machinery of policing arrived before the conversation about learning had even started.

You cannot police a student into learning. Detection keeps asking teachers to try."

This tech blogger knows that moral panic won't last.

"Moral panics are largely temporary. Almost everything we were sure would rot our culture, our brands, and the world around us became background noise within a generation. Calculators were going to destroy math; now a kid pulls out a phone to split a bill, and nobody bats an eye. Spell-check was a crutch that would make us all illiterate, and Wikipedia was not a real source, and typing out your essay instead of handwriting it meant you hadn’t learned a thing, and Photoshop meant you could never trust an image again, and Auto-tune was the death of music. Every one of these things caused a moral panic, with op-eds and hand wringing, and - for better, and in some cases absolutely for worse - every one of them is now so normal that the panic feels archaic."

This was the earlier with how it interconnects with the witch hunts

"No, the folks getting hurt are the writers. Not only the ones who are tarred - all of us. Every single ___-forsaken one of us. We are all made smaller by the pursuit of unproven and unprovable purity. Whether Ballard used AI or not (and she says she didn’t, and naive or not I’m inclined to throw my cynicism to the wind and just take her at face value, and you can mock me if you like), the punishment landed before any verdict was reached, because no verdict can ever be reached. Not beyond a reasonable doubt. Never beyond a reasonable doubt.

She’s not going to be the last. This whole setup, where anyone can accuse any writer of using AI based on gut feeling, and broken detection tools get treated as proof and publishers fold at the first hint of controversy because the PR cost outweighs the book’s revenue, is going to grind up a lot of people into a fleshy, bloody, bony paste. Most of them will be small-time writers, debut authors, indie-published folks without the platform or the money to fight back."

(Off Tangent, he does try the cult thing; that's a fandom thing.)

So, what do we do? Trust, trust that it is. (I wonder how much that paradox catches on)

In search for the iconclastic sociologist

'Speaking truth to power' With this brought to by view.

"Speaking truth to power" I knew the state ain't going to go away, individuals, institutions (firms non-profit) and government.

Anti-woke time of a limited supply, be it cognition of material resources can't at time be held, they may be shared.

Epistemic scaling does not comply to the bandwagon. Im afraid. Not all things can be funneled with the limited discovery of intelligence as "power"

This has lead into academic industrialisation and it's complex that leads into the furtherment of the publish-or-perish mindset,  To quote him. He's another former Marxist.

This was this sociologist's view, btw. Is he calling others anti-social?

Yet such a polemic of epistemology scrutiny is a thing that drives such I thing that I'm having to grapple with reading others, even with other's of ideas/concepts are being a free-for-all with the social sciences being free.

The neverending spectacle of transactionalism

This is what I talk about: when commodity relations own conscious awareness, it becomes apparent. Seth tells me to see it, and with the way to see these forces to predict with this entitlement of profit with the way communities form, also Fudge the MRA has been a dead head, yet all dead ends rest within anti-intellectualism.

Ivory tower to the Main road

Plot to spectacle since Aristotle.

Buying in or selling out
Quiet to load

Intention (noesis) to Randomness noise

Coherent to incoherent.

Serious to Play
Alienate to condescend

We live in the totality of the spectacle; there's not escaping it. Either we embrace the media of our entertainment in its many iterations of it's infinity, or we log off entirely. Or embrace with Dejourment. Of the tautology of the spectacle. It's circular reasoning, we will have to wrestly. Lean in become a generic hack, lean out become an anti-social elitist weirdo.

So thank you, industry, for making me see this.

So, with the macro, meso, and micro scales, do we deal with it? To see it. Of the Labour theory of value.

No winning with the leaning. We are overdominated by it already.

Thanks Deboard.

Reflection on knowledge rant

The Gish gallop, of the spectacle, and the reverse gish gallop.

Yet now, with all these moralisations and the elitism and the ideas with

it now, it's become apparent that I've made a professional risk. Not like Beep_boop took my job, or that I had one.

I did it because it was fun, this ain't going to get any points. Yet the 'left' and critcal theory. Of a polemic that drives scrutiny. the microblogger was not of a desire the reify

This revised ranty essay along with it's reading list on the AI denial cottage industry. Is exhausting, commodities of denial, and other ways that lead to believe. That it's a thing that I have to let the crud happen. Let the crud hit the fan as I must attend other duties.

Yet America's factionalism loves its teams and gish gallops, and I'm done.

Dialectical my cushions!

Can still not stop editing it. By this time, this post, though, I'll be done and continuing with my artistic endeavours.

The feeling when they're not ready for the amount of sociological research

I've done can't be comprehended into a single dunk tweet, and I dare not

interrupt the anger within micro blogs.

It's merely too BIG i can't fit it in, such aliteral mobs
harrasmenet to handle such a complexity.

Reflecting on this, can only say it was worth it. It's the most iconclastic thing I've

ever done, and it's spirit of Harlen Ellison's rant within his Glass Teat.

He's gone now.

ah, Symbolic capital, and the structural things

are reversed now, as 1Dime points out.

That now I'm apathetic of, with that case since the divide is the ethics with all that.

It is trying to put out a fire of bad ideas before it's too late, as it goes with the way of vaccine denial. Along with other bad ideas that have spread like wildfire.

Yet wildfires are wildfires. Criticism becomes commodified and incentivised

by the perverse incentives of online media, and there you are, forever.

40+ rewrites and illustrations of doodle-core and my other more serious expression.

It's an attempt to apply serious sociology to it all with all that I know from bad historiography, and with Althusserian sociology, I've been trying to make it out.

It's so exhausting. Is this what white-collar work feels like? Is this what working in an office feels like? I'm so tired from trying to catch up with the Americas' day and night work as I'm drawn towards its spectacle.

This is my alternative opinion of you as a citizen to bring in thought to rewrite.

Roleplaying as a couch golem – OF COURSE. I'm obsessed with AI effects, the miserablist/doomer/boomer and the industries intertwined outside them. I'm going to have to go rogue.

Since it's not a scam and it's a logic that's made me annoyed that I have to deal with the pestering insufferability of bsky discourse I've tried to avoid, I'm glad I'm out.

Wanted to do something different from porn, as they say. 

Thank you for all your understanding.

Yes Seth, you do know it.

Done. (until it's adapted away from the micro blog

discourse.)

Oh no, I did'nt use beep boop for that

 I merely expressed deontic relationalism

Real good ai btw despite my vigourous

research. I'll reach out. Even as goals may not align.

Bonus. This could be for the epilogue.

This article, even with such non-trusted people in state positions, tends to make me reflect.

Yeah

"It’s both intellectually and morally thin. But it’s also unawarely hypocritical. That’s because, at its root, this anti-tech discourse is ironically anti-human. It frames us as the machines. We’re positioned as passive victims of digital services and the devices they’re served through in ways that discount our capacity for agency, intentionality and responsibility. It’s insulting because we’re deemed to be morons by default, incapable of reforming our habits."

"Phones “make” us distracted. AI “makes” us lazy. Algorithms “make” us tribal. Social media “makes” us narcissistic

It’s a cheap and lazy story, though, which is why it works. Where’s the immediate reward in encouraging things like self-discipline, intention, healthy adaptation, self-awareness, anxiety culture, negative social norms and personal responsibility."

WOW! big giga centrist omnipotance there b-
*collapse*

Macro mob rule; Random waves; The deal.

Mass media spectacle, manufactured into commodity, into commoditized community of fandoms.

Play into the commodity genre, prosumer or selling out, play out of it, elitist or antisocial.

No winning or do not play? Seek an alternative of the horned dilemma with work and sport?

Not going to wing with a algorithm, or macro waves of attentional focus that are a mixture of misinformed and misguided.

Synoptic Reading, On Tech Relations.

(Your likely can move that capitalist realism down to meh)

Wedge this between pretty alright, since it ain't related. With dirty secrets of the record business.

What did we learn? From these ideas? Of the ongoing desire to build a material basis. Of ideas/expressions and with all that of dialectical.

For another blog post. Yet the liberals are bringing a knife to a gun fight. Even though I wanna criticise the conservative response, Nick lands accelerationism.

Here's me attempt to educate myself. This is an accumulation of all the tech relations with the classes.

The ones on LLMs are Ethan Mollick and AI snake oil. Yet it has lead to the hustle culture.

(Are you a sociologist?!) Yes. Althusserian. Time to do honey instead of vinegar. Sooo, you wanna read audiobooks? 🛋️👉👈 

                                  

The first two audiobooks to intake with the Beep_Boop to intake platonically if you don't like the written word.

Ethan Mollick brings the latest news, While snake oil brings in the jagged frontier.

These are the ways of the jagged frontier, so I'll see a lot of cultural shifts and a lot of false polemics (mwurica) thanks didney, violence with boobies and moralising and high horsing and silly wonks.

These are the culture of the internet, and with big vertical integrated media sources move us. With how this internet functions for the technofeudalist we go by now.

This one's more libertarian yet can be mid with the same spirit.

This is an account of the West and its response and the lack of stigma within China and other countries. It's like these two books are for understanding LLMs.

Harlen Ellison's chapter about pay toilets is worth adding. Attention merchants is understand how much direct response has shaped our culture. With the gift of the gift economies.

He condemned certain reactionary scab union practices while working with his own mediocrity of being an entertainer, and with that he made his adieu with his own organising. While he attempted to teach others where the pride in the craft was concerned

We are on the precipice of philosophies and disagreements. So yeah, enjoy the bumpy ride of the ragged frontier of Beep_Boop.

This one points it out.

Bonus one the reading list.

On my reading list, the left is more bioessentialist; the right is of mental labour and our history. Regardless, I will challenge my ideological presumptions and see if they lead me into life-changing revelations. I don't think I'll be achronological in literary interpretation; now I don't think we ever were.

Oh here's my review of Matteo Pasquinelli's book

Wow, Abi's got African philosophy and a substack . with the rebranding, maybe it will move others away from the doomerist/miserablist

This one was on my feed too, to be decided. He may be wrong about the anthropomorphic lawsuit, though. IDK cannot entertain it now.

"Sam Altman will hate it" Says within the promotional material. With all the venture capitalists going back'n forth. It'd be 

Oh, This is the indie essay scene of materialist semoitics.

Looks like a tech preperationist (Oh well, Will be categorised regardless)

Guess I'll put that book on my wishlist.

How did we get here with this polysemic tech?

This is for my big deep dive of LLM tech essay previously.

The phyrric victory of b_Ep boop inquisitions

There are the silly billionaires, and then the shovel salesman shows up. Somebody hires a 'real' artist based on direct response and preponderance bandwagoning, and what if they in the backstage use it too?

This is too end's justify means, whatever means necessary to extinguish a flame that's too late. Or at least for the microblogging-minded circles.

Well, not without authoritarian preporitary drm backfiring, and with that, the ones who hate the memplex of this debate, then it happens again. Tautology, keep the tautology going. Not moving on, not getting over it.

Policing invisible lines of the idea/expression of a monist way towards a way that's become the dominant ideology to try to feed the prosumer zeitgeist.

They're doxing, well, this all seems like quite the spectacle, to find a Disney villain and then attack that. Then march on with another.

I try not to give it power by paying attention.

Oh, laawrd, they're coming. Jaw Westernberg

Rachel Morton calls this out. Too, even with this situation of the lucifer effect, Not all physiological theories can be made. It's called to the ideal.. the ideal of the spectacle.

Why you shoud'nt disclose your ai use. of the paradox of this will set. Pressure to keep professional secrets as AI is used via mass media like disney and nintendo. What about the the indie author and that kind of responsibility?

Greg Welfords weighs in with beep boop.

Wow evn an Anti had gotten paranoid of being accused.

Dammed if you do damned if you don't, IDC it ain't my problem. 100% ignorance with all the volume over impact of qualitiive experience.

Then some smug misanthrophy if chavenistic purity, and pop.

Even trained writers who don't use it are scared that they will be which-hunted thank replaced.

Since the AI detection complex is baseless on LLM free will with stochastic gradient descent base, this wild goose chase will certainly have to take a GTFO approach.

So now we will see more quietism, more paranoia, and now more bumfuggery with illegal doxing.

Oh wait

IS THIS AI?

no 

Peter has be recording the abuse

Cw racism and slurs)