It's all a blur, so many little content curation and moderation being what is sold, all in an expanding universe of vendors and suppliers with all their advertising, all a blur, all the fandom/hatedom, all the time, all of it was going in a blur of media heads down the way.
Academics are avoiding xwitter, or microblogs, some of them are in substack, they are going there, I found a good post on obscurity.
Since it's all datum, observable of the lowest stratum of comprehension, the scientific, and the narrative of this is to study, or when with a monopoly/monopsony of attention. Fame/infamy explains the entitlement complex of status value and cultural capital.
There's little attention. No data for interupption advertising.
There's little attention. No data for interupption advertising.
No Ruthless expose industry complex, the need to make dramatic fiction to draw attention.
Thousands of merchandise, gone.
Fan fictions all around. Shippers, and all that.
No Status value to follow.
Cherish this moment while it lasts, I trust you, don't I?
( Oh, I've still have to learn to do a sales call, and a payment specification. )
Thousands of merchandise, gone.
Fan fictions all around. Shippers, and all that.
No Status value to follow.
Cherish this moment while it lasts, I trust you, don't I?
( Oh, I've still have to learn to do a sales call, and a payment specification. )
What did Zig Ziglar, a conflict avoider, says with the data generality and a meaningful specific? Or, a semiotic specific in a chain.