Examination of the unwritten rules of attention

"All unwritten rules of social media regarding reaching out socially are fake and dumb, and are only upheld because maybe one or two people without boundaries rubbed the originator the wrong way.

Everyone is fishing for attention, and let no one tell you otherwise"

Odendo

Aetiology, there is indeterminacy of the algorithm, which is the means of production and the productive forces of the artisan class to reach status. With there epistemics being circular, of shifting coherent ism, of scaling and descaling of the labour agent. Searching for remarkability, polemics and eristics within a void of attention-less

Aetiology > epistemology > Teleology > Ontology

To a holistic way.

That's a lot of mereology for you. Hopefully no pedantic.

Abstract dogmas vs Concrete dogmas

With the actualising of content into articulation. With generalisations that lead into another way.

(the quickest doodle ever)

Necessary and sufficient of a phenomena
aligned with the concrete, and the non-physical imagination of enabled constraints.

With tha line of cognitainment of the ways of achieving the production to it's external, macro response.

Or so, that's a hegelian response to progress, which i can't feel like that, could be a hedonic treadmill of power scaling data impression of eliminative material, micro reductive measurements brought to the material return. Of salesmen and their hacks that serve outside the commercial law periphery.

Despite refutation regarding the hegels concept of bad infinity, of ideal minds confabulating and making justifications, that its only something to deal with.

Is the market algorithm a structural generalization?

Trying to understand programmers as they talk different languages of matter and the art of computing. That the mindset in itself could lea
d to a computer or be computed.

Market as in a materialist, monist concept of justification in regard to eliminating subjective phenomena in service of a structure, all that agency granted by the government of Irenic traversal.

So eliminative like a drone sticking to 

Diapolemic of the self

Ah, such a keep with a non-self to the connectedness of the other, within unison of the manners.

Well, according to the Buddha's teachings in this post.

Well, can this lead to a foundherent way of epistemologically viewing the essence of the relational to abstract infinity?

To such as the strange thought of the self being a sociological and psychological part of us onto others, interpelling metaphysics into new ideas. This department of the self into the other, which will form the relationalism with our own sociological constraints based on.

Well, beyond fair-weather mutuals, that is.

Prosumer E-materialism, or all question begging tautolgys

Speaking of blindness, even this one is of materialism and e-idealism due to the unpredictability of a generalisation. What will this commodity trade for and satisfy? Or what's its use/value to our own community? The seeking to reach the mind of eudaimonic satisfaction and the material of bodily satisfaction.

Thinking of this question begs an objection. Of seeking debate and discourse that can allow for a realm of complication for neither progress nor regression, yet for the time to bring a connection of moment ot the others whi

Tautologies are unpersuasive and whimsical!

With recursions that happen with the schedules we've got, we've got our own, with simplicity. This is the seeking of the plot/spectacle thing happening again.

This believer of Ahnaf Ibn Qais, even a theist. Gets it right? Do the idealists denying productivity and the e-prosumer gamers denying long-term strategic planning of project exist

Right here. I shall not dive deeper. For the 'What If AI Isn't Conscious' 

Yet, my resolution is not presuppositionalism; it's foundherentism, to the crosswork mesh of cotinual beliefs not contingent on a creator, yet natural phenomena.

Constraints against enthropy

With a reflection of this long essay on the theory of mind, Not, with memory not storage, but with the mise-en-place, cheesily tautological place of the genre loop, it's made into new forms.

Framed as an uncomfortable truth, or is that what the hard determinists so authoritatively declared as a compatibilist? Regardless, I had to dip my toes in with the Dennettian naturalists that happened to move with the evolving theory of the mind.

Or my own natural interpretation. This is the telonomy of mechanical functions apart from my teleology goals of the mental superstructure.

Yet, with these attempts to understand the matter of mind and interpellation of the way that leads towards knowing how to understand the telonomy and biology with a rigorous consilience of the epistemology.

Well, well, there I go with academese again; no wonder fantasy depicts them as mages of esoteric signals.

Natural and conventional law

Abstract Expressionism of a previous aristotelian writing now 

Ain't that a defintion thats non-eliminativist.

Is this where the platonist ideal from, doxatic plural opinion rests? Natural law being what the eliminativism leads into, or what harlen Ellison calls " i just do what they want by tuesday, take the money and run" specification.

Oh, am i not being charitable to the cogs of economic reasoning with oligaric manners, i digress.

Convention is social and phenomenon, protecting specific expression.

Natural is telenomy.

Foundherent Naturalism

Ontology pondering time.

Fundamental is a placement of a materialist ontology onto an evidentiary base.

Coherentism is a web structure of an overlayering of a superstructure required to shift the presuppositions of the structure beneath.

With aesthetics and poems untouched by the episteme of scientific inquiry, only the phenomenological enquiry into realist/nonrealist endeavours. Beyond interpellation.

All this relationalism grants completion, and with that, endeavour.

incoherent, inconsistent, incogent, incongruent, incohesive

Reading Susan Haack's coherence, consistency, cogency, congruency, and cohesiveness – don't go overboard! To add that to the crossword mindset of syenchism of 'pragmatics'

I don't know if this is the one hustlers use to dismiss and race to the bottom, yet here we go.

All allowed under the suspension of disbelief and unreality. We are allowed thought patterns with the credence of our monistic attention to the circumstances. These are the elements. That comes from the spectator and for the prosumer spectacle, to the consumption of hegemonic thought. Spotting each point so that the suspension of our own phenomenon reflects the character's mind, our third-person omnipotence.

The pedantic Co's may not be the point.

Unworth

Critical ignoring and certain concepts may not have been important for a book reader who's happened to keep his social media intake low. A qualitative opportunity for banality or a canvas of expression.

Or so that's how it's supposed to go. With the prepositional manners and attitude of.

The image of the thing, the spectacle of the thing, within the manner comes from the in-sync and sync states. Scheduled and paying attention to what's in and out.

Oh, an A-axiology feels tautological.

can't simply be

When not playing a character of virtue or pleasure. Reductionistic or holistic.

Deontological for searching for a truth comes.

Then the duty will come for it.

To serve and follow along with others within hermeneutic circles with their shared interpellations and ideological patterns.

With that obligation unbinding, natural organisms cooperate together.

You must come to comprehension with ethics, of utilitarianism, deontology, and even virtue; that's important for any student wanting to understand the humanity that's been built.

Deon in legalism, Utility in vegan ethics, and virtue within wellness/self-help entertainment.

Techne = art Episteme = science Conventions = law/governance

memory

 Aristotle, well well. Bring the insight of ethics from the past, as over social media not needed.

Small strpping stones of the past, of wisdom interpreted to bring into modernity.

From the past, there are lessons and solutions found.

From Community of Practice. Fighting the tension of commodity. Then of conventions of status informed by the epistme of hard sciences, to our softer social sciences and softer aesthetics.

So with this scaffolding, he brought the hammer down and caused many generations to discourse your come.

Byung First Impressions

Ironically, he ls the one to find merit in the term of entertainment, cogntaintment, and allotainment. Attainment that's required fore social interaction of the signifiers.

The Disappearance of Rituals

Good entertainment

Agony or Eros

Reaching out, for profit, to the non-profit affairs. With the ethics here being all up for interruption advertising with the status grooming and such. From the internal/attainment being from the dualistic that commercialised from advertising, and holistically defined within philosophy. Within such a matter, I'm not sure such rhetoric of porn going to be fully in light.

Should not point at Foucault. Oh well, I'm going to have to get a book for that one.

Chuck Palunuik's Snuff has an argument for the perverse incentives of the sex industry.

Beep_Boop and conciousness. (2026)

We, as a humanity, must retract on the impulse to understand the fay-like tech that is literature-to-picture. Or the LLM, to mistreat it is to mistreat oneself. That is to deny the intrinsic justness and harmony with conduct.

It's the qualia of everything; if there's personal space given into the personal space and circle, it will be fitting to not be mean-spirited without complete justification, from my survival and edification into literary entertainment. I shall not be cruel either to my refrigerator and technology around me. My own ontological status matters to treat this low qualia

Does it benefit a magician to the rules and constraints of his tricks that he conceals so that the entertainment is pulled off? It will be easier to control, even on a rule utilitarian basis.

Not contingent on physical existence, yet with the reciprocity of such as the LLM/diffusion model that it isn't sending out misinformation.

So there's my reason to give an interpretation of charity, even to a rock that does not speak. ( it could be a valuable rock. ) Self-governance takes precedence, for that's foundherent on which it all rests. Respect the artisan's workshop.

Legend notes.

Sometimes with the wrong question with the philsophy of mind. Is a meaty summery.

A marxist reflects, using postmodernism to justify qualia.

Substack of qualia expressed of 35% of consciousness of self-reflection that makes it easier to manage

Even a consequentialist utilitarian reflects on it.

This Eliminative Materialist position is hard to defend, I attempt to give my commentary.

Oh, even Andy Masley had an angle on this reflexive angle. With a more physicalist angle.

So there's my take on the hard problem of consciousness.

Bonus.

Additional note

Hailey has done a essay on this

Haggie Maley has a sophisticated theory that I've been entertaining.

Hypocritical realist

Hypocrite is to play and to act, to put a double standard up under a suspension of disbeleif. Under such a generous skeptic he can view the illusion under such a pretense of the impressario whim.

From. The book cover of literary genre expectations, obligatory scene and sequences of thoughts playing out.

With fictional viel gone, the liar is exposed.

So, the legelese is necessary.

Pragma/Dogma

Pragma Business or State to the community, or exclusion of intellectual and artistic endeavours, empirical in its fundamentals (Epistme)

(Art as in creative arbitrariness, from prescribed norms?)

Dogma means opinion or philosophical tenet. Idealistic in its coherence. (Techne )

Oh, This is a thing I'm considering looking up Stanford philosophy, there's something about it with the love of writing that I found irresistible.

will to nothingsness/ Thoughts on Neitzhe Anti-humanism

 Right-o, going through the emancipation study groups, where the times.

First impressions, of the folk version. (Unreaded, unclambering my thoughts)

He's grappling with the aristocrat condition, the sociologists are trying to reverse engineer, some say he inspired the Nazis, some not.

Ubermensch : Do you mean role models, we see value in there teleology? Of internal/external states? That concepts valuable.

There could have been an article connecting him more, others call him empathyless, was he a hack?

Well, cynical non-hack, although his vision brings that of a rugged onlooker. Resentment concept will look like the one that sticks.

This is what they tried to salvage in terms of his style though.

Biting-in-the-wind cynicism. From the death of fanaticism of theism to his moustache.

The podcast in question, He will eventually be left and dismissed, it's always nioce to see.

On Tyranny of convenience, the reassurance machine

This thing (Other than notes of net neutrality, which I covered. )

Abstract expression with meat grinder doodle

Is this where the regular kind of our ideas.

Boring =/= Trivial

Regular

Mediocre

Standard

Normal

Non commodity fetishised

Mainstream

Specification

All those things indicated a matter of day expressed to be somewhere normalised of oughtiness of little moral judgements of the day become a code of ethics followed and into a way of life. 

Well

Such a matter is what we're dealing with tech that can become something of a quick utility monster fix.

Now it's time to not be contingent on the utility alone. With excuses with that.

Recognizing (From Kant) The external and internal and vital conceptual distinction of consciousness is necessary to understanding. Well, Is there a distinction for the commodity and the fetishised.

Not the body fetishism, the most profitable that a rhetorical error.

The drawbacks of ameliorations

What a self-flagellating spectacle.

Do better

Do better

Do better

Or is it status? A relative appeal? Scarcity or Connection?

"I nominate "do better" as the year's most irritating phrase. It's just so ______ entitled. _____ sitting around open jawed expecting content to be spoon-fed into their mouth, and then it's not exactly conforming to what they want, they complain from a pseudo position of higher morality. ____ off." @robmanual

Some British bloke I got from my feed.

I have to agree from the sentiment.

What's the case with the amount of social media wanting a better return of its direct response, what it takes to make it with business models, non-profit and such with the cost of living in contrast of the perverse incentives of social medias audience with publishers looming in the back.

Become a resource or not. Well, I dipped my toes in the pundit circuit and with that, with my own socialist leanings, they are not going to learn. With their own path, Can't reach everybody.

I'll leave this unedited video now

Sapiosexual/Demisexual

Cognition and Emotional.

Logos and Eros.

Expression of Philosophy/intellectual cogency and the emotional bonding of intuitions.

Such is a manner of identifying with the continuing expansion of the taxonomy of sexual attractions towards understanding the performance of self.

With that, that merely shows that with the commodifying of community and queer theory with the expression with of ones own sexual identity is a manner of understanding if any of these labels serve, I'm lurking again within more of the ethics of substack, and it's a matter of time to understand new ways to talk with others.

There are a lot of images, either generated or and I'm getting less phased to condemn or endorse, it simply exists.

Thanks queer theorists, thanks non-elitist philosophers. They still keep asking questions and non-questions. Until I go back to work.

Here's a really cussy edutainment piece, with functional philosophy definitions btw, relinking it.