Beep_Boop and conciousness.

We, as a humanity, must retract on the impulse to understand the fay-like tech that is literature-to-picture. Or the LLM, to mistreat it is to mistreat oneself. That is to deny the intrinsic justness and harmony with conduct.

It's the qualia of everything; if there's personal space given into the personal space and circle, it will be fitting to not be mean-spirited without complete justification, from my survival and edification into literary entertainment. I shall not be cruel either to my refrigerator and technology around me. My own ontological status matters to treat this low qualia

Does it benefit a magician to the rules and constraints of his tricks that he conceals so that the entertainment is pulled off? It will be easier to control, even on a rule utilitarian basis.

Not contingent on physical existence, yet with the reciprocity of such as the LLM/diffusion model that it isn't sending out misinformation.

So there's my reason to give an interpretation of charity, even to a rock that does not speak. ( it could be a valuable rock. ) Self-governance takes precedence, for that's foundherent on which it all rests. Respect the artisan's workshop.

Legend notes.

A marxist reflects, using postmodernism to justify qualia.

Substack of qualia expressed of 35% of consciousness of self-reflection that makes it easier to manage

Even a consequentialist utilitarian reflects on it.

This Eliminative Materialist position is hard to defend, I attempt to give my commentary.

Oh, even Andy Masley had an angle on this reflexive angle. With a more physicalist angle.

So there's my take on the hard problem of consciousness.

Bonus.

Additional note

Hailey has done a essay on this