( updated 2026 ) A Manifesto for end Beep_Boop polysemy factionalism

The Omni-bus of llm misinformation

refutations To respect Polysemy of a new age to end the dogmatic eristics of a fantastical boycott. Of being critical of critcal theory 💪🛋⭐

This embarrassment of praxis ends here.

To end of the art hall monitors with it's false historygraphy. To point a finger at the AI denial industry of decentralized spaces.

With all it's prosumerism. I must give an opinion within

a doxastic space this dogma ends here. Couch Gregor is angry.🛋💢

A cheat sheet!

So I bring an-

That will likely be misinterpreted, by Andy.

"But Couch Gregor, what do you mean you with the code word draw buff dudes

in tho-"

Yes Kevin, I will go down to the dogmas that are presupposed with there precious, oh precious entertainment.

Historical dungeon and the Ai Dungeon before things where innocent.

(well earlier than that) Since computation has begun.

It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse-engineering accidents involving Dall-E.

all of it was simple before

A call for beep_boop preparationism. No dog in the race. To end the ignorant assumptions, so I must dive into the double consciousness of the artisan class.

Then a naughty publicity stunt.

It began.

Then after Alexander Avila, I'm like, why are we fighting? This factionalism or fandom had started. This is leading into a second opinion bias encouraged by social media.

“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”- John Steinbeck

So the temporally embarrassed double-consciousness of the copyrighter of centralised  media.

Then Twitter became X, and then a spectacle happened. The Disney happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it; now it's a mess. The trolls have become snobbified. Somthing open source nominally got labeled as anti-centralisation. A false base for dialectics is not a way to go for it to be anti-worker. Such is the bad epistemology that had lead to this to seep of the brute truth to power of the intellectuals and academics biting back to the entertainment industry.

Dogmatic Dialectics? Where does it go? Into the totality of the spectacle.

Commentary on the Idea/use within education.

Educationist theory from Seth and this

Phrenology, and you are the product with prosumer ai-detection. 

Well, even with doctrinaires still madden me. Here's idea/expression dichotomy. The law does not protect genre, good one too. Idea's can't be selecting, they're collectively owned by the commons, and then there's the way that I'm going to happen. Expand the conception of copyright till it's impossible.

@amagire.bsky.social‬

whenever someone suggests that a webtool can detect AI images, I do check them against: 1. a digital illustration 100% hand drawn by me 2. a photomanipulation created by me 3. a video game screenshot, unedited and taken by me so far, not a single "AI detector" has ever got 2 out of 3 correct
that is WORSE THAN USELESS. "Determining which images have been created or altered with generative tools" isn't even a use case for gen-AI, somehow
okay, well, that's your right, OP, but just so you know the linked tools were: wasitai.com [failed 1 and 3, correctly identified 2 as "not AI"] and thehive.ai/apis/ai-gene... [failed 2, said 3 "might include some AI elements", correctly identified 1 as "not AI"]
usually I delete quote posts if the OP blocks me but I guess I'll let this one circulate, it's important to be aware of the limits of these apps. the best tool for detecting generated images and text is and remains: your human eyeballs. sorry

Magic bullet solutions

Video on educational applications.

Education industry complex, what are you going to do huh?

Additional bonus edit