Dead Audience Theory

Since sombody threw a tantrum at me using tts to read my academia.

I'm now brought to believe in dead audience theory.

 So, Now dead audience theory By somebody who is AI-assisted.

This had an ai assisted illustration in it.

Why is it that the anti-science sentiment of simple solutions to complex problems plagues me? middlebrow to highbrow misinformation in American polemics from 2022 2023.

Have you got it too, the mildest blue of tech value, then a shocked person in your stream?

By the look of things, I have not even followed this supposed technocritic once. I don't think he implies it; Neil Postman probably would be able to draw circles around him.

Why do I keep iterating? Well, I don't know; maybe because I have no influence outside of this little tiny plug. With all the things going on outside, I have to take into consideration other people's views the diversity of viewpoints from those who do use the tool and those who don't. 

I'm picking up nice signals that can help me complete my viewpoint in understanding these issues more holistically. Now, that's what you may call critical thinking.

Leif Weatherbys frenchy Semiology book

Beware, French structuralist theory ahead

Since French semiology and all that terminology are in fashion now, somebody in the digital humanities had to reflect on the cultural tech zeitgeist that we're all facing. Being the one out of it.

Such as the term 'kitsch' and all the things that might team with a function and poesis, dyscobia, and a convincing case of non-consciousness being about, I am yet to suspend my judgement on that.

He does reveal that this kind of cultural panic and humanism have an archaic route within Noam Chomsky. Something I'm not going to have to watch out for are the coming years, as we embrace a rather radical centrism of data and pros of a scientific rigour.

The way such it is, as he has better terminology than all of American exceptionalism, though, is giving me solace, because such a spectacle we observe, and this is being understood now from outside of it, and that's going to be good enough in Europe.

Oh, the denial is getting remorseless, deeper in periods now as I explore the polemics.

The wars continue.

To clarify on beep boop

I refuse to be a proxy to mid journey, techcapital venture the artistation fiasco, the -oncepart org.

I refuse to be categorised. Only that to the one and only cyberethicist.

Nuances and complexity ain't complicity, the bank ballance may not contribute to the discussion

Crimes against logic book states that pointing to the prosecuters/defendants paycheck don't necessitate suspicion, we live in a totalling capitalist soceity. Better or worse.

Two types of anti-capitalist critique, making the world better or made at parents.

I made the Japanese soldier blush

Out of sight out of mind.

Made him blush.

The amount of editing i did won't commit a fanatic narrative to know otherwise.

Can't lead a horse to water teaching cyber ethics in this B of an earth.

Even smart people fall for it, silly instuition

Of double wrong

What's the matter with with this polemic?

To the mind

its so quite 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇪🇺 all this debate?

Why am absorbed in the mwurica in this debate? Why are south countries taking account of all this?

Because spectacle, that's why. Or the spectacular labor of the west,


To quote

"Mwurica believes in the inconsequential ENTERTAINMENT of partisan womps! 

expect this theme for the next 5 years
To the others.

This had with deepfakes (could be mistaken identity too); others I've

addressed here.

Notice where the attention goes though.

China hmm.

Source: Free Systems and Politico and 2024 ips

"

Because, why o why, do they know that I have to go out, and why I don't debate raging bulls, since it's wise, I guess, sapience, and salient to seek out other voices like Abi Awomsuo

It's a matter of Anatta and self-elimination and hearing voices, and all the awareness that brings to it all.

Such a way is me understanding collective expression in foundherent of the individual.

2026 Stalking Horses on brain damage. (update)

Since a new year, the age of the crankover tech that was in the 1950s to 2016 has then become capitalised and brought.

You must extend that to the video game panics and search-engines that. Question..

https://www.buzzsprout.com/2396236/episodes/17378968-you-deserve-better-brain-research.mp3 and this other one calls the findings mis-based

NWDR Another incoherent talking point without examining the reactionary capital

Peter Coffin also Covered it, Yeah, in some forms the lump of cognition. Again, not again.

Link to that article

No dirtbag leftists with no sequester zone science again.

Where's the Foundherentism of the passionate moderate?

Oh, additional reading, the academics have picked it up.

Including this other one who gave benefit of the doubt.

Getting increasing convinced that this fanactism

AND ANOTHER THING, plato had the same view on this.

Despite my love for audiobooks and text-to-speech to intake knowledge platonically. He can be wrong, along with the noble lie.

"I keep returning to the sentence I heard in San Francisco: “Maybe atrophying people’s brains is the price we pay for curing Alzheimer’s with AI.”

I understand why it lands. It captures a fear many people feel but struggle to articulate: that AI may give humanity extraordinary power while leaving individual humans diminished inside the world it creates.

That isn’t the future we have to build."

Oh, and there's a different one via a user of the sophisticated thought, drawing it from the earlier patterns.

"The evidence for AI-driven cognitive decline is younger than the certainty, and the demand for unassisted thought is doing class work"

So, I must give my adieu to this fake-leftist (see what I did there) issue with my own silly purity ritual, since it's all that it is. With such progressivism meaning different things for others.

Also "paid off" appeal to motive and mis-placed. So what if it has capital, Coffin can do the same as I showed. Within Crimes against logic pointing at the prosecuters/defendent's paychecks don't matter to the testimony.

Personally Does the ArXiv use, Cosmos Institute, Oxford, or any responsible case within medicine, social science and administration? Are they all brain-damaged?

It's allowed to be used for research
Sorry monetisers, it can't be made for a commodity. (Well, Oss and public domain.)

"BUT THAT CHINESE TEST REVEALED-"

No, that's another moral panic.

Other than the Disability cases by Sean, I heard from prosthetic intellgence, idk if that's term suitable it's the start.

Ahem! Excuse me, discourse can drive a coach loony.🛋💫

THIS IS FUELLING ABELISM; DO NOT SPREAD IT. I say those with cognitive disabilities and thought slime should be mocked due to it.

Ty Peter Coffin for this video. For the term fo R_____D