On E_ Zi_____

Or Infamous at this rate, this is vulgar populism at it's core. Link

Is this anti-science? Anti-ecnomics? I've already points the way he treats his other technocritics.

"I want to clarify that I never claimed that OpenAI is a profitable business, or even has a good or sustainable business model, but simply that this data falsifies a big claim that Zitron has repeatedly made. He seems to have moved the goal posts to claiming that training costs should count toward the gross margins, but that is a totally different argument.

If you make money from your customers on average, you can grow your way to recouping even very high fixed costs. If you instead lose money from the typical customer, as Zitron repeatedly contended, then growing more will make you run out of money faster. This is an incredibly important distinction, and getting it wrong for so long (in the face of reporting from the Information, which Zitron favourably cites elsewhere, as well as independent estimates) is frankly disqualifying for a commentator on AI industry economics."

The comments on that is really what this has become, neither critic or booster/hyper

Why do you debate them? Because no, That's why. Look at the comments.

This has escaped sensible discussion and the ruination of organization within disorganization separation of populism and elitism of ideas inter-connect and naïve noble-savage can happen, yet with that. Tech being art in the aristolian sense, that we have to inquire if these are any serious matter or another vulgar critic of crassness to discard with Bull**** jobs that of socioeconomic to regard.

Cynical AND optimistic of attention

Sales funnel logic with it.

Cynical

I doubt this guy citing that 60% study is a mere extension of our former tv with direct response compute and the art of that being tantalizing with it all.

Direct response compute = Metrology

Everything else = Mereology

Measured to felt.

And Optimistic

Yet with podcasts and other stuff, we are intaking a lot of different sources through osmosis. Guess the attention 


It's a matter of the engaged attention and the ethereal attention

The second renaissance predicted Kants greatest misery for everyone

I'm taking my thought experiments from popular thoughts so dual praxis of foudnherentism develops into my monist conception of the physical world.

Transcendental idealism

How can we disprove something so magical as the interrelations from the probability and possibility of the conception of thought and the discovery of the mind of reified abstract consciousness. Even if Kant was disproved, it provided a framework for consciousness and man.

This was the lack of respect of the deep pluralistic reality of the great consciousness reckoning and interaction, then into divergence into the teleology to ontology.

There a humanitarian discussions by academics that are way better

its so quite 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇪🇺 all this debate?

Why am absorbed in the mwurica in this debate? Why are south countries taking account of all this?

Because spectacle, that's why. Or the spectacular labor of the west,


To quote

"Mwurica believes in the inconsequential ENTERTAINMENT of partisan womps! 

expect this theme for the next 5 years
To the others.

This had with deepfakes (could be mistaken identity too); others I've

addressed here.

Notice where the attention goes though.

China hmm.

Source: Free Systems and Politico and 2024 ips

"

Because, why o why, do they know that I have to go out, and why I don't debate raging bulls, since it's wise, I guess, sapience, and salient to seek out other voices like Abi Awomsuo

It's a matter of Anatta and self-elimination and hearing voices, and all the awareness that brings to it all.

Such a way is me understanding collective expression in foundherent of the individual.

Did i waste time making essays instead of illustration?

Idk

I felt it was fun rather that getting high metrics doing porn.

Why am i doing it was a personal one army trek.

Im still considering editors, despite my own.

Idk if it should become a movie, game, of a book.

Yet it's all FREE.

So I'm glad that its all out there.

Reflection of essay part 2

The current discourse is about wanting to take it seriously. Will likely take the brunt by the prosumer denialists. While companies bring in their use.

The media, it can be a headache.

Since my essay was fuelled with my hatred, naysayers are wrong. The well has been poisoned too much, though. It's how i detest all this surge that made me

So, the names that I will make up here.

An honest discussion. (A famous YouTuber.)

Why did you bring me to this?

My honest answers on 

Yeah, certain tendency within social media are going to get more socialised into commodity fetishised, more bifurcated, more splendor, wheres the way?

Nah, if the job is falling down the cliff, if the waves of attention are not with you.

Then the suffering is granted.

Makes me think of the catagory of proffesional sociel media. Proffesiona pressing n all that.

If you know, you know.

Underspecification

Underspecification

The land of indeterminatcy

Left undefined to be filled

🛋👉 [                                   ]

Renaming to reclaiming interpretation

Mental gymnastics? Social democrat mind or brain trying to reorder or resell? What are we to do.

Or she calls prompts poetry. Which is the natural language prompt.

There have been llm consciousness advocates, activists, and data workers who happen to reclaim it.

Abi calls this the language listening medium.

Another astrophysicist poet. Dr Sam Illingsworth, which is the problem of interpretationism, and with all that, it's a mental game. A language game, as Wittgenstein would put it.

The Doll Girl says AGI is a category error. Yet, I'll respectfully disagree with the mimicry claim. Since these claims come from power structures that may serve to placate thought.

Fundierung, or The umfunktionierung

Yet with these systems. I do it with others so it's another game

of constant arguing, culture war and 9/11s, So now with the definition games and knowledge by acquaintance. So The therapist happen

T

This one I can't remember getting this one, It's that of the way We know that way.

So yeah Guess it has a history, It's within all of this.

Against Propertarianism

If everything is reduced to the metrology of direct response computation unconsciously, then we have become more machine than machine. Mereology vs Metrology.

What a distinction, Goodhart.

Guess they're still wondering around, trying to find the silver bullet.

Commercial law, though, isn't everything.

My property property property, property prop ol  pro

Living in technoconnectionism of deep pluralism

Such a land like this was made to connect or disconnect us.

That was the ground to make things scarce and then together. What the amount given through each amount is done.

🛋🧩

Idk how to

Benjamin Studebacker said that theres a deep pluralism that one can't escape with community making, and there's going to be ways to resolve.

Misplaced concreteness

This idealist philosopher is right, Of course, with things like this
This illustration meme shared around, then it gets deeper, and then he uses.

Since There's not complete certainity on LLMS being concious or not. I do not care.

Is this this abstract stuff with our ideals in our minds, the reification of our desires? Wiki

Do they realise that they have to think for themselves? Consciousness works with natural ways and articulations.

So this connects with our ideas. Down to our own internet, I'm now dealing with how organising in itself moves.

Idea/expression I suppose.

Using the pretentions of labor protection horrible things

 That Sarah Case was like react world in a fancier package, enough racketeering.

Did they reject your irenic show?

Sketches for a freelancer. Scribble_core

Part of the freelancing, and reciprocal manner we live in.

To be at peace, life's too short to find their teleology.

They will have their way, as they will with yours.

Bon appetit.

Getting rejected/disconnected with liberalism.

Malpractice Edge and The Creative Edge of investigation

 Sometimed you got leave the vulgar populism of social media and be critical of the ip law of academia.
Elitism, Populism. You got it.

Then you've got to go alone again. Omnivorously

Irenic/polemic to Apoligetics/eristics

Is that a circle too?

Anything for coherence i guess.

Survive the chaos Fang&Tristeria

Fang&Tristeria You can read

I've done my best to read and comprehend all tge necessities of this edgy fantasy sprawl.

Mercenerys and transactions that are made with monsters, swearing and blood is made.

This is with the informal found family of rogues and a girl within a raggety.

So I've been listening through my sociological study breaks, and the blood can be felt with my ears, so grisly, even with the sexual details which is still, erm non-sexual.

So yeah, blood n guts, blood n guts and cheer.

Being a hack is the submission

Eliminative materialism charade.

Even with the circle of coolhunting

It still carries on, critical theory.

Conciousness, the beep boop documentary, into the rabbit_hole

My oddest radical opinion on augmentative consciousness. (Completely interpretationist and have disagreements and falsifiability with that Karl Popperian jazz.) Not suited for microbloggers

Wow.

Do they even think of these questions on the highway road of microbloggers? 

This documentary.

Commit to anatta (Buddha non-self) with all presuppositions wiped clean.

Then watch. You know where I am.

Why, with the crop of free Beep_boop documentaries, there are more to choose from with all these questions. I doubt the commodity hustler outside here will have the time to understand that question. They are in their own circles of relations.

Even when it blames 

These questions of absolute epistemic certainty with consciousness require serious thought, though, and it's bled into my artwork.

Even when I don't directly use it

Has anyone seriously thought of consciousness before?

Interrupt the popular bad idea

Persuade or perish, so they say.

Yes, I do advise not getting gouged by a bull in a china shop that does not know it's dead with the tranquilisers in, or read/listen to the room. Yet all those preconditions are not known.

Bull needs to be left in the china shop or be gored by its horn, so no horned dilemma. Leave the stadium of horned dilemmas.

While making more sense in entertainment, less so within the politics, academia and specialised fields.

Unpaid labor, social clout and bandwagon. Such is a matter that there could be a grift or a spammer behind the scenes of meaningful connection.

I'm getting old.

 

Still updating my main essay investigation

Spellings applied; I've been on Substack and rabbit holes like a veteran. 🛋🌃

with more doodle-core gags. Despite the fact they may hate this as well. No winning from proprietarian dominion, I suppose.

 Memetic a go go for curiosity bait..

For my hobby, critical theory? I got two pieces of feedback from literature/sociology. That's cool. Getting disquistions and essaykins back. Including the bottom right.

Free read > 🛋👉 3rd version off you can see the bottom right of all the indie knowledge work. Sceptics are welcome except for propertarians.

I'm still working on version 3, so other feedback and second opinions are welcome.

If I can't deliver the impact in video essay format on YouTube, then I'll be alright here. It's not like the reach there may be shared.

So bye-bye, propertarians! 👏🛋 Not falling down that rabbit hole. Will help guide those who are interested.

Oh, looking at me?? I'm merely a couch himbo thinking this out! 🛋👈⭐

My Birthday!

 
Thanks for everyone enrolling with me. 🛋⭐

look at those balloons

On organic labels of pseudo reality

On the realgoodai trying to move out, while the 'real' artist is now harassing others with the propertarian moral panic, being temporarily embarrassed by franchise landlords with the witch hunts.

The genie isn't out of the bottle; these were the natural conditions that were already here.

So, we are in the crunchy stuff now. Of the ideological madness of fame/infamy?

Saying impartiality.

Do some feel like the turtle having to hide ride now?

😕

via smatterbrain

Drew this with worried interaction that might happen if they make a hit-piece/call out.

They already doing it again.

Oh dear, what will I do if I get misinterpreted?

Nothing, I guess.


This is where authorship becomes an ambiguous concept of the right to free expression

and the right for oblivion.

This brings authorship again as I peruse Substack.

should i disclose copy-pasting Seth godins blog post from the doctrinaires? Idc.

Happy pride.

Convienient eristics heuristics; The Commercial metrology trap

Once you see algorithms develop, you'll see how they think, through philosophy of mind.

You cannot unsee.

There monotizing meterolgy. The connectionism, then the grissere of a metaphysical labour, to the unpaid labor.

On A-chronicity catechism

First impressions.

There are books of catechism, interpretations of many minds.

I can't contain such work with the times ahead.

Like as if you would carry the voices here on after.

I haven't looked at the inside book yet

So a poem of contrivance.

Prosumer metrology: On the The Eye Of the Master.

Even with the general intelligence being a category error, I'll give you that. That's a good examination of the Beep Boop using the labour theory of value that's within good faith.

We know it's eliminative all the way down with funnel metrics, and the e-begging and the coherency are brought and sought by many minds.

Yet what of the experience of Taylorism and measurement of the manner in which the mindset is employed? The meaning completely changes within the connectionism of the market, which is already a generalised construct within the internet, and which you participate in.

It's abstraction, an abstraction of our labour for all your labour lovers out there.

Well done for blowing my mind with the grissiere and abstract labour, from which we build ideas from the corpus of knowledge that we dialectically, positively and negatively construe of the dreams of the perceptron and all these mechanical terms that make your living mind think.

Yet a dialect aside, even a negative dialectic (as the Frankfurters would go) will happen to go.

Oh how our internet has made us into commodified communities as a mentally salient sorting mechanism in order not to lose ourselves from the delusion, even beyond the general intelligence as it's defined now.

It's specialised ain't it? Apart from that disagreement, five stars.

Woke 2 ain't happening, back to traditional queer theory.

 No, I'm not part of it, outgrown my 20's now.

Yet there those eho do anti-social , elitist, or selling out of criticsl theory.

Oh, 1dime on anti-social adventurism ain't praxis. Theres alsi refutations too such as the cubs gay marches as queer theory advocates who go for there rights. Yet this is the problem of perect coherency, its always messy, sometime obscure, somtimes obvious.

Case by case.

Guess with the campism, then theres no perfect coherency, as with social media, as with the ways llms effect us.

That's what it takes to be a sociologistp

On Classifiers

I see their use is more common now.

Peeps are paranoid about commodification; these are the algorithms and heuristics which linguistics has toppled too. And now they're checking through this. This has been checked adversarially, intuitively and counter-intuitively through a Socratic construction, with some autocomplete along with some other thoughts.

Pangram and others don't work. Or the self-abnegation of personal responsibility. Shall I quote?

Anyhow, here are two articles on why they are not to be trusted. Oh yeah, did I tell you the classifiers don't work in and of themselves? Well, you are the product. More on the math here.

Wow, look at that math.

Including a linguistic lesson on negative construction.

“It's not X. It's why” is a linguistic construction, more specifically, a “contrastive negation followed by a corrective assertion.” It's part of a rich “grammatical context for negated restrictives in English.” Olli O. Silvennoinen wrote an entire doctoral dissertation of 131 pages on contrastive negation.

Other the times, I won't ad hominion him on other bad essays.

Since this is continue with Sam Illingsworth's notes, the bias of these.

"Even a perfect detector would be the wrong tool

Now grant the impossible. Imagine a detector that worked flawlessly tomorrow.

I would still argue against it, for a reason that has nothing to do with accuracy.

The moment you put a detector between a teacher and a student, you change what a teacher is. You turn an educator into a police officer. The work of teaching is to be a co-creator of knowledge alongside the student, beside them while they struggle toward understanding. A detector makes suspicion the default setting. Every essay arrives presumed guilty.

That is not the job I signed up for. I did not become an educator to run my students’ words through a lie detector and wait for a number.

The evidence backs the instinct. I read every public UK university AI policy I could find, 96 of them, for a HEPI policy note this year. On a close reading of a sample, the language of education sat over an architecture of detection and surveillance. And two in five universities had no public AI policy at all. The machinery of policing arrived before the conversation about learning had even started.

You cannot police a student into learning. Detection keeps asking teachers to try."

This tech blogger knows that moral panic won't last.

"Moral panics are largely temporary. Almost everything we were sure would rot our culture, our brands, and the world around us became background noise within a generation. Calculators were going to destroy math; now a kid pulls out a phone to split a bill, and nobody bats an eye. Spell-check was a crutch that would make us all illiterate, and Wikipedia was not a real source, and typing out your essay instead of handwriting it meant you hadn’t learned a thing, and Photoshop meant you could never trust an image again, and Auto-tune was the death of music. Every one of these things caused a moral panic, with op-eds and hand wringing, and - for better, and in some cases absolutely for worse - every one of them is now so normal that the panic feels archaic."

This was the earlier with how it interconnects with the witch hunts

"No, the folks getting hurt are the writers. Not only the ones who are tarred - all of us. Every single ___-forsaken one of us. We are all made smaller by the pursuit of unproven and unprovable purity. Whether Ballard used AI or not (and she says she didn’t, and naive or not I’m inclined to throw my cynicism to the wind and just take her at face value, and you can mock me if you like), the punishment landed before any verdict was reached, because no verdict can ever be reached. Not beyond a reasonable doubt. Never beyond a reasonable doubt.

She’s not going to be the last. This whole setup, where anyone can accuse any writer of using AI based on gut feeling, and broken detection tools get treated as proof and publishers fold at the first hint of controversy because the PR cost outweighs the book’s revenue, is going to grind up a lot of people into a fleshy, bloody, bony paste. Most of them will be small-time writers, debut authors, indie-published folks without the platform or the money to fight back."

(Off Tangent, he does try the cult thing; that's a fandom thing.)

So, what do we do? Trust, trust that it is. (I wonder how much that paradox catches on)