Beyond Commodity Relations

Modes of production and commodity relations – all that affect our cognitions and extensions. This could be the bundling with the trying to capture the meaning

That was what Althusser was about when he examined dialectical materialism, which has gone through sociology and economics. Yet the fixation on such an ontology can only lead to blindness, sub-blindness to the perceptions of all phenomena and interpretationism, from the literal matters. 

Thats his diagram of, I follow the crosswordist image of cosiliance

Simple and complex pleasures, by utilitarian Jeremy Bentham. That if a philosopher is unsatisfied, then an animal wants more of that inside-out desire. The banal and the elite – yet to the postmodernist, they deinterpret all meaning into non-hierarchical demergence.

So, no wonder it makes a case, as people rejected such questionnaires.

Yet from the pragmatists, and even by extension of liberal policy. Then comes a time with all the useful fiction of easily measured money and eliminative materialism.

I lurk now, and the audiences of other posters who go on TikTok and do these 

Pleometric produces.. odd work, and with Neural Fizz, Arika and the Amoebas.

@pleometric

"do people watch this slop?" yes and they love it. The thing about short form is that worse is better, things are meant to be consumed, discarded and remixed into new strains. The slop is the point."

Really? So worse ? Better? Or a sweet desire to post and define practice in another area of distribution. This workerism, defined as Immanuel Kant's miserablism and John Locke's conception of property as a monopoly of deliberation, is only going ot become a different conception of ownership.

That's okay.

Confusionism

I guess the GoFundMe way of trying to bribe copyright extensions won't help protect small creators.

Not without the endless copyright trolls and all that. Oh well, guess I'll be ignored. It's a cautionary tale of being too terminally online.

That's the point with ulterior motives and motivated reasoning; I have it with myself with my own erotic intuitions. Yet I know that blind faith alone won't carry a good case.

Confusion Matrix

Unrelated to a peanut calling another viewbotting, yet idk, what Seth says about cheating applies. Along with a dishonest game of publishing out there.

There's a machine learning term confusion matrix, or 'viewbotting service', and it includes spell checkers and the AI detectors not working.

So, even with the variables of all that. Cheating and all, the attempt to short-term to game and opportunities to race to the bottom are always present. Not going to deny. With the terminus of behavioural patterns aligning with thad

Ignore the vanity metrics.

The crass xwitter spectacle of provocateur oligarchs

Each and every day, OpenAI and grock, these two are the ai companies that suck the most.

It sucks since it's due to the provocateurship, the ones that took an accidental discovery to an annoyance. Is it that when China releases something, Twitter artists (derogatory) throw pretensions and now? Two billionaires act like clueless chickens.

So yeah, this is in response to Gio's response to Anthropic to the defence party; it was a kerfuffle.

Ain't GyenSynder a left populist, btw? Oh well idn follow her.

Current license opinions, of civic DUTY.

Couch Gregor, resolves. Also more Beep Boop because why not. Of all the law terms.

Are they going to know this is extrajudicial? Okay then.

• DRM is bad; it absolves civic duty. I have a mind that can informally judge ownership
  
  
• Ultimately, I have to conclude scraping ought to be public domain. not private equity or government. Any readjusting of IP law to fit their interest will lead to injustice.
  from the notes, fair use/fair dealing and public domain.
  
  
• Commercial firms ought to have their copyright reduced. Specifically Disney. Vertical media outlets should not have monopoly power over non-profits and freelance business acts. (Disney does not care about non-profits, it can take a 
  
  
• Protect Public domain, virality is a crapshoot other than the direct response platforms. Celebrity endorsements vertically travel at moments at the algorithm.
  
  
• Since there's no accepted conventional definition of plagiarism, it can be debated ad infinitum; it's infinitely generative. Conceptually and abstractly. So lawyers are needed for agreements. Yet the agreements themselves can become overwrought, so a handshake deal works best between client relations. (This ain't natural law, hence why the court and lawyers exist )
  
  
• Keeping the idea of the idea/expression is a useful fiction.
  
  
• Freedom of expression + Right to oblivion > Copyright. Since state-sanctioned monopolies don't need the first two, since popularity isn't needed. There are cases of unjust profit entitlement/fraud, yet they are always in favour of concentrated industries, so anti-trust first.
  
  
• That being said, a freelancer can be a case of vulturism, yet there's way more vulturism by Alen Dean Foster and in other cases. Creatives are losing their design rights out of silly clauses. (It's always disney/nintendo.)
  
  
• Nobody should make a living as a copyright troll, completely.
  (These are all my unforced opinions.)
  
  
• As time goes on, we are going to see more indefensible conceptions of the anacho-capitalist concept of self-ownership (If somebody does it, someone else will.) It's simpler; nobody does due to public domain. Non-binding and unforced with not statuatory.

These have been informed by Tom Scott, Patricia Taxxon, and Seth Godin [2] and Technollama, a technically proficient lawyer, and Geo

(If you want to check the law notes. and recreate advocacy groups)

The fun fun fun of the most frustrating arguments on microbloggers. Of the draconian copyright law.
oh This too. I feel like this is becoming cope bait. Again, too many bad actors hijacking.

Despite all these notes, I'm still keeping my, possibly last, zine's production untouched.

fatalism destiny of elitism

These anti-realist, anti-representation attempts.

That Orson Welles turned his nose up at those snooty naught experts while teasing his audience with his wife in such an anti-plot way. Creatives in the field are faces with an academic system that has failed to overcome the gatekeepers.

So, left to fend for themselves or get lucky, as they say.

With what attempts to hold together, even with a pirate/anarchism, there are attempts to hold a leadership, or they call it Hydra leadership. Yet to be proven.

Can there be fatalism to consumerism and business transactionalism? Of middle class transactions, there are other business models. Cost of living and such. Or the owning-class property relations or the working class relations in; tension as the divide is made.

To pick which fates and destinies is all part of the commitment.

Oh, I'm thinking about this Marxist sociologist, Nicolas D Villarreal using the labor theory of value. of the beep_boop solutions.

Another grandad visit

Mind was full of dogwhistles. To find honesty within government matters Is a mental toil. Yet I take my energy from trying to console Grandad in his late days.

These times I want to be young and carefree with the childish flying. So I have to make something that ain't Junuphobia.

Talks of beep boop, Grandad. My exposé on the Disney exposé went ignored. There goes my polemics, down in non-newsworthiness. Ruthlessness does not count as the spectacle self-implodes and sells spectator tickets with its frumpy enforcement.

Disney, with its lapdogs, the embarrassing performances of unintentionality. Obsessing about it now as they deliver blockbusters mystifies the iconoclast within me.

So, hospital bed and smartphone photo sharing with filters and how normalised it's become.

Sigh. Apart from the denialists, or miserablist enforcement, still alive. The ai issue is with my trying to remain a freak away from the hypemonger.

I've yet to read a giant back catalogue that makes me snobby with video games. Time was on my mind, yet so was A Confederacy of Dunces.

Enough of the self-important news made a spectacle. Slap of pain out. Cheddar cheese lunch sandwich.

His consciousness is there, barely registering as I explain my project too. Not sure how this licentious youth I have left contrasts with the stoic, frail tradition left to reconstruct into fiction. What a word! It's normalised. Glad age puts another in a state of mind. I'm silly and occupied with my own domination of 230 of a bill of anti-trust which I'm doing.

Seth Godins cold copyright response

"Id you're a mediocre freelancer/firm, you're doomed, I can get a mediocre illustration from Stable Diffusion, and I own the copyright. Yet if you're the one and only illustrator, then I'll hire you" memory from one of his podcasts.

Did he mean this? A curation site I found.

One could argue his embrace of Ai (He does not use it for his blogs) Was his view of the mediocrity an annoyance, well, he's out of the call-out posts. So his ideas, including with his card pack, is to roll with it.

The systems of mediocrity was already here, that's what I agree with most.

Yet, he keeps writing. This is an indication as a b-corp liberal that's had it with this misconceptions of these business.

Wow, This fan blog of his writing style of publishing is still going huh?

Beep_Boop and conciousness.

We, as a humanity, must retract on the impulse to understand the fay-like tech that is literature-to-picture. Or the LLM, to mistreat it is to mistreat oneself. That is to deny the intrinsic justness and harmony with conduct.

It's the qualia of everything; if there's personal space given into the personal space and circle, it will be fitting to not be mean-spirited without complete justification, from my survival and edification into literary entertainment. I shall not be cruel either to my refrigerator and technology around me. My own ontological status matters to treat this low qualia

Does it benefit a magician to the rules and constraints of his tricks that he conceals so that the entertainment is pulled off? It will be easier to control, even on a rule utilitarian basis.

Not contingent on physical existence, yet with the reciprocity of such as the LLM/diffusion model that it isn't sending out misinformation.

So there's my reason to give an interpretation of charity, even to a rock that does not speak. ( it could be a valuable rock. ) Self-governance takes precedence, for that's foundherent on which it all rests. Respect the artisan's workshop.

Legend notes.

A marxist reflects, using postmodernism to justify qualia.

Substack of qualia expressed of 35% of consciousness of self-reflection that makes it easier to manage

Even a consequentialist utilitarian reflects on it.

This Eliminative Materialist position is hard to defend, I attempt to give my commentary.

Oh, even Andy Masley had an angle on this reflexive angle. With a more physicalist angle.

So there's my take on the hard problem of consciousness.

Bonus.

Additional note

Hailey has done a essay on this

Ufiction to unfiction. Copyright horror story

Well, From this story of derative. Of ufiction, uncomfortable fiction. Is a good story on if copyright trolls had there way.

I'll keep tabs there still creatives at the edge, having opinions and are not gig workers, trying to make it, even with the pull of perverse incentives.

We need to drop the pretence that copyright censors
hip could end the Ai phenomena. Plus it could infringe on my right to depict Bowser within satire with proprietary DRM. This is universal enforcement, not selective like copyright trolls do. My fan art is textbook copyright infringement. The onus is on the firm nintendo to send a DMCA takedown if I commercialize it.

Based on Kant's categorical imperative of internal freedom. Treating each other through consciousness rather than objectifying.

The inputs and outputs don't match, technically so it's nebulous. Plus, Copyright is anti-worker with the labor protection. It's for distributors/publishers, not creative labor.

Thankfully due the infinite shelf space of the internet distribution, micro-distribution it will niche out even if it could try (It's not like it's Super Bowl mass advertising, where one will have to buy/ask advertising/celebrity endorsements to get traffic. )

All that indominable logic of expanding content id and conception of ownership (Do they understand that? The idea/expression dichotomy exists.)

Walk away from this one. 

Tiredness of the Beep_Boop pro/anti hype.

Lurking on the LLM/diffusion engineers, (reasons listed here and my tab ICYMI)

May be indiscriminately be labelled pro AI with my rigorous epistemology and interpretation of these events. Despite what AI industry is doing, which I don't have control over.

Having to deal with Americanism seeping into England is, yeah. Well, I'm going to beat a cushion on England, don't you worry. Equal flogging. The west shall have it's course.

There images, the open source ones, not the Silicon Valley one, that nuance can be applied. Along with my novel which is hard to professionalize 

They're trying to lead the with my different interpretation of NFTs too, one I've tried, doing something out of trust in blockchain.

Empty slogan from the those who build a brand of Anti-ai, this is what happens with the fundamentals and foundherently misplaces from dubious sources, the lay-people still die on the hill of copyright and the water environment

Yet it's hustle culture I'm pushing back again, the in curiosity, the dangerous motivated reasoning behind such silly censorship laws of copyright, even under the pretence that it will be pro-worker and anti-ai. (It will never be, sorry folks)

Why are these insufferable-refuted zombie lies seeping in within UK discourse? Is this what cultural imperialism is like to the most showboat country? 

These are the pioneers, as with every novelist.

Guide my faith with the semiotic signifiers, from the spineless bottom. This is the courage of curiosity and it's made me an extremophile by default.

As if courage ain't a virtue for those that are racing to the bottom. Winner takes all financial capital head, follow the leader. It's up to us to take our epistemology out of the spammers, hustlers and hypebeast to search for the autodidactic metacognition. (As with that concept, qualitatively speaking.)

Plus, that Libby statement not for censorship is a positive thing, folks.

The ship has sailed.

(Bonus video, they way they act with the bad faith second order of the call-outs/cancels Peter coffin points out is worth noting here.) 13:22

What I've learned is the discourse is not going to be found of frustrated freelancers and microbloggers, it keeps going in circles.

Against Eliminative Materialism

Cognitium

A post confirming my deontology towards machines that eliminative materialism of the golden mean

By a former Gamergater?? Whaa? (I haven't checked is opinion on that, don't come at me.

Calling him a gamergater (was he?) is an Ad hominin. So it's not related.

Found various arguments that i found nonsensical, even through pundits with other positions don't agree with. ( Eliminative materialism of consciousness being the one. Violates my deontology. Trying my best to not tamper with the golden rule. 🛋🎗)

I keep finding the fundamental presumption indefensible, such as cryptography (such as a trans getting hrt over it.) along with that this is going to stop.

So yeah, there's a polarization problem, escalation. This is coming from the reactionary populists from the liberal side, they say internationalism matters. Well, functionalism does too, thank you very much.

I do believe a mind exists, contingent of material/physical conditions, I'm constructing it right now with descriptive.

That's enough of that, time for entertainment.

Well well, got bible cloes, business Brad, Hustler Hag and Driver Dan.

These are the archetypes that I pass through that I'm not directly naming due to the ways of trying to read people I disagree with on substack.
Another for the ideas.

We where all sloppers in the prosumer, primordial soup. (Except for the Harry Potter bit.)

Have a sofa seat from my ref folder. A non sequitor.

https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/in-defense-of-slop

 Thing about a slop, its made us more mindful with our consumption, Our intakes and our Imputs, when we don't swing down the entire Burn-the-internet-memes-on-behalf-of-disneys-drm-repulsive-practices. It's made me think of pleasure, about shock value, about attention. In 1970s and it's a slow, absent doomerism that's only made me want to do something more.

Avoid mediocrity, and mediocre of the averages, with independence of vision. ( Wow, James Gurney, if that's a thing, Commodity fetishism'n all, it's banal now, so now what I'm going to do?)

That's the problem with slop, it's anti-positivist definition, not a metric. Going to like another bara pin-up now at my microblogging feed.

Well, there's an article that's made me think, including Andy Masleys

With all the slop, SEO and all the stuff, the principles of distribution remain the same.

Oh, they're trying to inspiration porn JK Rowling again, I'll post this Verily one

*Prosumerist, it's naturally, physically impossible to disassociate from consumerism. Only get post-scarcity.

at the end of 13:00

Marked for death/Marked for life

 Since certain things are blind side themselves, the doctrinaires that fly in my for-you feed with the occasional posturing the random beep boop hate.

I don't have to time, An alternative opinion is what I'm showing.

Already, they could frame this tweet, quote-mine it, then make it into a call-out post to try to get clout, yet I know better. Well, esteem, it's one big fluff of a drug. Only thing to proceed now to see others who have been through the dip and blocked, with the way of having.

Not curious or interested.
Do they realise that I'm dancing and contacting the catgirls and the furries of open-source, along with all that LLM/diffusion model discourse? Well, If they find this and take offence, that's a life.

Gamers are so, so behind on this, it ain't even funny any more.

@aelkus.bsky.social‬
"it's doomed on arrival it's doomed on arrival.
Hard to know where to begin. "AI" includes things as simple as heuristic search (go to first few chapters of the market-leading textbook). It is checking your credit card for fraud (neural network's early usage was in bank/credit transactions). Verbal creep is akin to what happened to "algorithms"
People's relationship to "slop" is also complicated. I hate a good deal of slop but also am an unabashed fan of AI-created cyberpunk electronic mixes, which I take mostly for what they are as background music much of the time
Framing as "anti-AI" at best gives you a high-end status market category, like "GMO-free" and crunchy stuff that eventually gave us RFK Jr and antivaxx crowd
I think a much more feasible thing to lean into is just the consumer backlash that is going to come after vendors realize corrosive effect of low-quality saturation 
‪Damned Robot‬ ‪@supremerobo.bsky.social‬· 3d

----
AI will probably end up being what is used to filter out Chinese factory dropshipping goods on Amazon once consumer anger forces action

---
barriers to entry will go up and its going to be interesting to see what kind of signifiers of quality will win out. history suggests they could take many different forms
i don't really have much of a clue about what they will be, in large part because vendors' interests also determine this as opposed to just consumer demand. remember chaos after FB tweaked its content recommendation/boosting software repeatedly? Fortunes instantly lost overnight
i do feel fairly confident that the crunchy approach probably leads to a dead end

Me too, as I looked into it.

Doing something you don't care about ; a good doomerist post

What happens when you commodify?

All merely at the breaking points rule of law?

Just do rule 34 art and tail popular entertainment campaigns?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just make sfw cutesy relatable comics while having no editorial work

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just do stuff at Buzzfeed with listicles and other things?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just just just.

I do respect this doomerist substack article.

The lonesome death of the last copywriter

"I’ve had a growing frustration with the way AI skeptics, especially my comrades on the left, dismiss the likelihood of mass AI job replacement by pointing to quality problems that are both easily and affordably fixed.

Most creative jobs in the US aren’t making art that people care about. They’re making corporate slop that everyone hates, but which is necessary for doing business. The only people who will miss the human slop when it gets replaced with AI are the humans who used to get paid to make it."

Aaah, respect. Well, If it happens or not, have a look.


Listening to te the one and only Garth Marenghi's Bursted Earth. Or I could listen to Snoop Dog's voice read voices to me on Speechify. Which is more mediocre. Seth said it best with his own doomerism, anybody hustler stuff that he can use Stable Diffusion that's pretty alright, or the one and only illustrators he alludes to.

Or that, not rehortically, more convincingly. So that's his commodity fetishism and prestige. Magic and mysticism that can't be judges from the algorithm mindless data-landscape.

Letter of disinterest of Beepity Boop Wars

It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse engineering accidents of Dall-E.

Then twitter became X and then an spectacle happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it, now it's a mess.

gambleor (on a shooting) said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that (Bad actors) happen to hold positions which broadly brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny." So we are now that stage of polemical convenience.

I'm not representative of my personal boycott of Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out and leaving.

So meta-polemics ooop

Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them.

Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.

I'm not representative of the Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out.

(Oh, I don't support the OpenAI fudge-up btw, this is me handling a complexity. I'll be misinterpreted and go several different ways due to reading comprehension.

The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within 

Tesla and Nfts are stocks are a thing have been bad market crash opnions. Now It's another turn.

Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls 'baby leftism' for lack of a better term (I call it 'wilfully misinformed' or Prerosterous), has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.

This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:

• Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient. It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out. Have to give it for fanart/fanfiction here. It's the worst possible argument of eliminative materialism of fair use.
  
  
  Any copyright framework that will forbid transformative works will have way more damage on startups, and fanart/remixs will be forbidden under the regime.
  
  Gotta claim these models are ontologically non-infringement by design; Input and outputs don't match. Fair use/fair dealing and within the public domain. Nobody should use the anarcho-capitalistic self-ownership principle here. It's way simpler when it's in the public domain; as an idea, nobody does it.
  
  Fan art and cover-band art will be banned due to civic responsibility moving from freelancers to commercial firms. Since the internet is built on infringement already.
  
  It's gonna be like the story the derivative. With the brain implants. Content Id from Disney/Nintendo.
  
  That's my Cassandra, unpopular opinion.
  
• Water has been refuted, repeatedly; here we are. Not even a carbon footprint.
• Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
• Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class/artisan/creative/Petit boug) Yet here we are.
•  Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels/koch group Group? Weird centrist opportunists like Ed Zitron,
  
  My charitable interpretation is they bought in. Most charitable.
  
  Is this yet another reach via an astroturf Christian (family value) fundamentalist, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism!
  
  
  (I wonder what happen to Karla Ortz embezzling all those copyright funds into a reactionary regime is feeling.)
• Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
•  Automation is a matter of capital and in regard to freelancers and firms. Too much epistemic certainty from those who aren't epistemic experts. (Post Edit, Also what will get replaced are teleological, capitalistic, commodified jobs in the job market, like copyrighters.
• The clanker slur 'discourse' has became ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
• Also, reflexive consciousness is an argument of people who don't know, So I clarified my position here. I don't have complete certainty, functional conciousness man that I am. So I can't comment on it.
• No, That 95% is an orphaned statistic cheif, it ain't scholarship.
  
  When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
  
  The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
  
  Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
  
  They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.

I must return to the rant since the small-scale bubble of social media isn't reflective of activism at large, since the thing isn't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaptation, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.

We will have to interpellate to this epistemic tech, for no epistemology is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaptation we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. These second-order effects.

So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with proprietary DRM? Misrablist with the Class that's supposed to be a civil lawsuit.

When they bring it like this.
Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul supporters and men's rights activists; that's my prediction. Copyright censorship? Nope.

If boycotts look like this, then it's going to yet another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.

I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right about this leopards eating its own face with its conception of ownership and property.

Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it. We are going to have to re-strategise with understanding this while ignoring the provokers.

So, it's going to be antitrust. Against the laws of censorship of copyright and odd anti-porn in order to win points to a privatised entity that's going. Good thing I'm going to self-publish. This has made me less radical and more of a sociological generalist in terms of allegiances for my campaigning for recognition.

(Oh and don't act like you've got a monopoly unless you go viral and get a Jeremy Clarkson endorsement, celebrity.)

And another bonus link of what to do with sociology by Nicolas D Villarreal. Of executive class dreams. That's a Marxist refutation

(bonus link.)

When Propriety DRM hits, Moral panic washing.

I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.

... This nsfw gag

Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers. 

Deontological application? If a cost that would not even work? <Article of a chief ecomonist btw.

No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?

Reading this free open university course of criminology

Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?

Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.

(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)

Moral entrepreneur is such a good term 🛋️💭

Reassembled/reinstatement rather than Replaced

 As I try to have an opinion (no opinions allowed on Twitter, artist) of being reassembled rather than replaced.

Two Studys, One of the evidence on Reinstatement. Along with a working paper on Robots and firms I've read. So do entertain better ones before looking at microbloggers and anger there.

(That's the physicalism's way of testing, from literature to textbook. Learned that from bodybuilding.)

Alternative to the populist one that worlds going to end, merely because that elite class, ( Demographically Christian white men in the west, capacity qua capacity) going to control slightly less of it. With its token supporters.

That's one of my theories with labour markets being made anew, deproffesionalize and professionalizing of our cycle.

Here's a materialist/ideology interpretation of the AI with structuralism. As I learn the tenets to apply to my method of understanding the world of qualitive differences. Here's an hour of a book I'm getting. B-B-Bonus video

Plopyright hate post by Bintendo

Hopefully nobody proselytises with the doctrinaires. All the erotica about it is vastly superior to that business model. Well,

Worst thing about copyright is reducing all ideologies of art into transacting a monopoly to a publisher, that's not art. That outcome ain't the top of the algorithm of our attention of all the hits (Although I do get it, otherwise it's the fire hose kind of situation.)

Gift economies (that don't exist.) Pro bono work (Professional stuff) and Alternative means of models that don't mean being subservient to reactionary capital. Copyright is the biggest defence of monopoly, so it's necessary that is hides behind it.

Some Bluesky posts I've been collecting..

Retweet
‪@wwahammy.com‬· 3mo
Copyright is the most anti-worker invention ever. It allows companies to demand writers do free work and then decide after the fact whether they want to pay for it.
Lawyer>
‪Meredith Rose‬ ‪@mrose.ink‬· 3mo
COPYRIGHT IS NOT LABOUR PROTECTION. COPYRIGHT HAS BEEN ABSOLUTE DOG**** AS LABOR PROTECTION FOR THE LAST 400 YEARS PASS LABOUR LAWS. STOP ASKING COPYRIGHT TO FIX THE WORLD

Oh well, With a Fandom is that it's licensing malpractices with charity and other events, it's not something I'd like to flirt with. This video may sum it up, yet there's the amount of distrust to add to my reason of why am I not a gamer.

There's a continued insistence to enjoy toys and the pleasure principle.

Welp

https://www.suedbynintendo.com/ for all the litigious malpractices

This is what a monopoly without antitrust does to you folks: litigious malpractice.

(Bonus)

This has been going on for years with such a controversy. From the 1970's of the demonology of copyright. Twenty-page document of lectures of the thoughts.

Learning the Beep boopitys in academic circles

Beep Boop = Ai For any savvy reader out there, when I talk about it, within my microbloggers, I'm talking about it. I've to keep it low in case random aggro doomers come and nibble at

Since, its become a standstill of recursive doomerist. Ignore the news-headliners of ai being Jailbroken and come with me with my sources on knowing the beepity boopits.

( Post edit, I haven't checked Steve Banons the last invention ) the last two, this was where my curiosity had led out. Oh well.

I've mentioned The Last Invention, yet what about Machine Learning street talk?

Lump of cognition fallacy with the latest one here though, even though I enjoyed the definition of intelligence with less is more (Which is supposed to be a paradox btw.)

There, articulating theories that are better there, even the sceptics I felt like I learned something with intelligence being defined right now. Come and seek the new answers with a niche audience of a bunch of llm/diffusion and creativity that ain't reflective within the bubble of social media.

Because it's ultimately, and most fundamentally inconsequential, those who beg for propriety drm and infinity of copyright trolls.

Guess I'm stuck in the middle again.