Crowd pleasers

 

The crowd-pleasers and the polemicists behind a block.

It's time to know when to not pay attention to all in their backyard.

Such is the case with plenty of writers, illustrators, and freelancers in the realm of agnostic non-curation. Where judgement outside is seen from an agentic algorithm deciding who to see from the firehouse of potential relational nodes to connect and separate.

So, is the public again in disorganisation. Seems they will always be

The crowd pleasers.

"Don't act like a celebrity till your successful"

Ernie Bushmiller said that.

Is this what is meant by the internal theatres of seeing all these monopolies of traffic going by? 

Some get it, some don't, with stigmatised viewership. Lacking foundations and foundherent justification of the reason with the conclusion showing up on the feed.

An opportunity of conveniences of masses showing up like this. Not rhyme or following the law of non-contradiction. Although that's necessary to distinguish between coherence and incoherence, it isn't the core to live by.

So the ineffable mystery of getting a hit remains. Of the most relative things, the algorithm of the first empirical insight, not the understanding and wisdom it leads to underneath. Such a discovery beneath. Don't follow any growth-recursive YouTube channels, and learn direct response offers instead. Along with qualitative unmeasured cultivation. (or what the commercial firms calls brand) ]

React streams = enactivism

Enactivism is commodified, so that's why it will always have traction.

The most casual journalism there is, like this one, may not be the best, even. I don't know if I can reach that moment of passage. So they flow with all the time with metrics and traffic.

As with all isms, there is a mindset that precedes a philosophy of consciousness with the mind, with essays that I'm reading right now, even beyond the scope of the sociology of this.

So granted, these computational metrics computers use used to be a job; now it's a deal to lead a way that's ineffable and immeasurable. Or such that an irreplacable something within man makes it beyond such an essence granted with his natural expression. Yet we have our own sociologically and psychologically determined interpretations that intermingle.

So the immediacy and the emergent properties that I'm not proprietary at

(Further note, wow Seth Noted the computers where speeding up in 2017, even with his call to action to my least favourite book, Lynchpin.)

Cruel Clown show

What a show that will others believe they're owed entertainment. Owed amusement, owed kiddie pool play.

Such is a means that will never end, of large waves of attentions economies that will move in and out with much whimsy.

Fame, Infamy, and Attention Economising. It all happens at once, performance metric hallucinations shake like winds. Commercial platforms yearn for it, long for it, and call for it.

Now, I shall quote, as we go through this circles.

Dyna Soar 

"One of the worst things that can happen to an artist is becoming unintentionally famous on the internet. Nobody is in control of it, and when it occurs, it’s a completely destructive force that endangers you and your work due to the nature of the majority of people online. The macro-level behaviour of social media is sick and twisted and directly/indirectly pursues the suffering and torment of others as entertainment. It doesn't seem to matter if you “embrace” momentary celebrity or not. It will punish you, hunt you, grift off you, and make up stories about you regardless. There is a sense of entitlement from the viewer that they are owed entertainment constantly from you. That all work you do is immediately “open source”, available to anyone, and ready to make a buck off of. Any rejection of this is considered elitist and antisocial, and the acceptance is considered “selling out”. You can’t win and in general, nobody I know that has had the spotlight thrown on them really wants that. We all know it’s horrible."

B- bonus. If you haven't already, you can look of Signifiers in the documentary of the entertainment industry. Or, with how social media is treated like one.

FD signifer 1:12 with racism content warning. 

Confusionism

I guess the GoFundMe way of trying to bribe copyright extensions won't help protect small creators.

Not without the endless copyright trolls and all that. Oh well, guess I'll be ignored. It's a cautionary tale of being too terminally online.

That's the point with ulterior motives and motivated reasoning; I have it with myself with my own erotic intuitions. Yet I know that blind faith alone won't carry a good case.

Surrendering all stigma to the traffic metric

On the streaming services.

Fishing for attention, competing for it, warring for attention, for all to see.

Moral knowledge becomes falsity when the origin raises the pontificators' views the wrong way, and then they lecture.

With a product, service or policy, there's an incentive to lie, generally speaking.

Yet direct response, eliminative materialism, virality, celebrity endorsements – that stuff that I had to hide in the brand world of e-idealism.

Oh marketing, and the infinite regress of anti-marketing, how it manipulates, how it drives us. How it leads us. The lowest comprehension of a stratum.

The banality of diapolemics

So he is stuck, within statsis of all things that happen to bring him the torture of the cogs of the lands of wanting to be a anti-woke YouTuber nitpicking pop media's nitpicks.

The pundits have beeing going back and forth, I happen to this

It got me thinking of this link, of tackling infamous pundits for the sake of it.

Or the saying comes with the commodity relations to our intangible, qualitative attention.

🛋💭

Oh dear, we've reached the bipartisan hacksmanship of our entertainment nexus, pundits and PowerPoint punditry.

To what extent will these continue with this micro medium of the attention imperative? Everybody, to some extent, is copywriting and advertising to some extent in a contract propertrian.

trying to measure virality

The ideals travel without concrete form, unmeasurable concepts.

Often it's nothing; often it's everything. It's an external macro phenomenon of it.

Unable to grasp.

Confusion Matrix

Unrelated to a peanut calling another viewbotting, yet idk, what Seth says about cheating applies. Along with a dishonest game of publishing out there.

There's a machine learning term confusion matrix, or 'viewbotting service', and it includes spell checkers and the AI detectors not working.

So, even with the variables of all that. Cheating and all, the attempt to short-term to game and opportunities to race to the bottom are always present. Not going to deny. With the terminus of behavioural patterns aligning with thad

Ignore the vanity metrics.

status/situation of centrist status swirls

Hey, wanna be banal? Want to have no opinion? Want to be nothing?

It's easy money, a sinicure, a cush job.

Merely exist, then wait till death.

What's that? No opinion.

Well, that's what a clerk happens to do, or what happens with low self-esteem.

Sit on the fence, try to be proud, yet not, and take the commodification word too seriously with amoral patterns. There are hills to die on, and the one that claims and ontologises everything and nowhere on a base of solipsism arrives at nowhere, with an opportunistic meliorism with that mentality.

Oof.

on the lindy effect

The Lindy Law

Reading self-help advice of crafting crafter for craft. The way of the meta of meta. Self-referential.

WITH NO OWNERSHIP Welcome to the creative commons. Are you surprised?

So much intake of consumption of content with the way it's like it's got that way. Industry complex of condescension on the front page, or am I looking at the mindless entertainment in infront of the front page?

This is the best the place has to offer.

Then you have to protect your attention.

Then with manners it goes. To look in the other places.

Cruelly Eliminativeist and cruely Empiricist

look at all that logic and physics of what some may call business. if there is a physics to business, there is none in the qualitative side, or the burnt embers

Why I'm against it: it's not fun not having beliefs and sensations.

Crafting crafter of craft. Rather than the unique one. To the way that the origins of things aren't unique.

All that scientism is any ideological commitment and an attempt at universal appeal. Mindset of a production boolean value.

A job of bean counting. A job is a measure of the sunk cost of wrong measurement, of Pavlovian frameworks circulating into themselves.

Such is the status of old money and cool money.

Catechisms not contingent on

With talks going on and on, exchanges like that.

I wonder how many read and take literature and the formation of themselves and news through the oracles of experts. Then that way, through there insights, it will lead to a new turn of know-how, to being in the know.

The produce with the service to advertising.

With no contingencies, there is no need for any attempt of casualness; they all go and vanish away from the disposable chatrooms.

That 1%, out of a direct response. Could be oblivious, and that's okay.

Even the lonely ones leave on the Substack. Unable to sell a copy, the attention drought is with us. Either stuck in short-form video trying to get engagement.

Comparing it to a hamster wheel. Generating and accumulating raw datum of the insights landing randomly on.

Not all tantrums are worth it

Certain arguments are meant to continue, held in a circle of audience capture.

What's a self-referential feedback loop, self-contained? 

Thousands of curses, thousands of crys, thousands of going down the line.

Then there's really than real, or verisimilitude as the likeness of likeness; I prefer respect out of a duty fervour.

The lies, the truths, the ways that they weave when I curate and place a moment of reprieve.

Why do I tip down when I go round an ruminate? Then there's the moment where it's brought back, and I'm stuck within Parkinson's law.

There it goes, down, down and right the way around. I'm looking at something realer than real. Is that what consciousness is within the head of an impossible argument to transcend and to touch an abstract visualisation from the concrete reality? That's hyper-reality.

Not a touch.

Double lifes

The pornographic libertine Epithumos, and erotics of art.

merely post a transactional porn of sexual capital, Thanks 1dime, that's entertainment clerkism and that's all that bean-counting does. Oh well, It's like I'm taking part of that with my own typing and production of illustrations, gracing amongst commoditised, conventionalised norms of social media, yet it's a matter of understanding and being aware of it.

To create a double life of a jerk-off bubble.

Then there are the other curational accounts that are not straight up porn which help create culture, and they are helpful too; the sfw ones that do it about sensation and the phonomological account of one significant curator of freelance curation can add taste and direction to the culture that nurtures it.

Or the intellectual curated

Directly polemical, not apologising.

This may be where the satirists and direct market happen with demand and the react streamers who happen to move towards the amount of ideological driving and various positions.

As a sociologist, one mus curate that too.

Omniameliorism: finding the limits of craft and pragmatism.

Better at who? There is no better possibility with the commodity of React streams and thirst traps. The conventions of Meta make a new commodity of various lanes of audience capture hitting the area of iconoclasm.

Such as the thought-terminating cliché of a part of the comparative of direct response pragmatism sold back to us, which hides the opportunism of finding a needle in the haystack and all that marketingese.

It's a part of the awareness of the prosumerism of our desires of status. Fed onto such as the cycle of satisfactions of a hedonic treadmill that keeps us going.

For the desire of controlling the ritual of solving a rat race crossword that seems to move somewhere, yet then nowhere.

This ritual from Byung about the virtue or will to uselessness, or unpragmatic emptiness, against the mainstream narrative? Well, peace of mind. The point is to dissect its pragmatic framework of presuppositions and unpersuasive tautologies and then process.

Even progressing or developing to nowhere, the presentism will work now.

Carry on.

bopkin LinkedIn profile

Bopkin Cappy Ogy.

Professional entrepreneur of textiles and furnishings. Marketer and producer while owning two branches of warehouses and ventures. 

Age: 25

Contact info: Bopkinscush@Wayline.com

Surveys [Redacted]

Slop as meaningless concept

Thinking about mediocrity, along with the meritocracys associated with.

What is a slop?🛋🥣❔

#couchgregorblog #editorial

@Demigurlboss

"AI slop is a meaningless concept. It's not any more slop because it's AI, and the slop churn was going long before AI hit the scene. It's burying a thousand ledes so you can hop on an uncritical superiority bandwagon instead of acknowledging the impact of perverse incentives on social media and art.

IMHO, slop is something designed primarily with the aim of hitting an algorithmic feed and getting as many views and shares as possible. The point of slop is to get views because views equal money. It's something made for the sole purpose of exploiting social media payouts with minimum effort."

Nioce. Fast and cheap, the hackney'd lane comes around, even I entertain it with its tradition. It's where IP lies.

The perverse incentives, deserves to be placed here.

Drawing from memory.

Why I'm not a himbo

Or cannot specialise in its brand. Well, Qualitative expectations of over-specialism, When I want to philosophise, to do that, or when I want to do hackneyed porn, I do that. There's those who try to go at the edge of being unnecessarily libertine, this attempt to radical becoming a dependence.

Its an entertainment arch, noted before

The Thirstrap industry complex.

Im afraid, since ai has managed to take the thirstraps, the social media thirst rap is feeling its feet at the nail of the coffin.

Well, the same feelings i get from commercial illustration and graphic design, yet still, as a no name who sees copywriting on the deathbed thanks to the mediocrity churn of our industry, this shows its mea culpa.

Deep fakes, before 2023, it's all a sign, a sign that I cannot specialise into himboness and thirstrap.

Or at least, my tastelessness of seeing the expression that makes the Video games Dead Rain seem erotic. They are always going to be excuses to push the boat, to push for sexcess towards licentiousness.

It's more tastelessness now.

That's somebody who is libertine as it is sexploitation, paradoxically done as ethically as a character cleansing. Now, What is the purity comes I can keep performing like that. Can only do with my fictional constructs, even if the sex industry overlaps with the military industry complex, that's where the problem lies.

Yet it feels so 90s, where i express anything other than sexuality (books and WERDS) that these deliberate illiterates reveal their colours. Red flags of perverse incentives.

Such a casualness cannot forgive the illiteracy and mob manipulation of bad actors.

Since time immemorial of the internet, reply girls, there has been an army of sexual clerks who shy away from irresponsible. There needs to be a more careful consideration other than, erm, video game discourse levels. It's twitch stream, it's React stream discourse, dead genres, that zombie on.

So I can't specialise.

So forgive if I can't act like a thirstrap. I'll have to make a seperate nsfw microblog anyhow.

The popular vibes around the personal space

Vibes, or the smaller reaches of the terminally online. When it comes to the masses, It's indicative to note one's own influence and whether it's important to be of governance.

"Don't act like a celebrity if you ain't successful"

I think of the Ernie bush miller quote, is that me being a silly newbie or a ponderer of the direct response and luck outside my affairs.

Best to check and be responsible for the epistemic bubble, along with the personal space of control.