The slopoxomy. Links.

(Maybe it's a homage to a comic, oh no, well, another way to not trust micro-bloggers. Slop + Taxonomy makes the discourse. Inspired by the contaxomy from quote mining.)

This is journalism slop to begin with. Amanda herself called these content hot-dogs rather than alchemy.

In the ludo-primordial soup of our subconsciousness of the play of our media, there's the struggle that existence since the dawn of time, it's our slop.

Appeal to composition ( oh boy, the fallacy lover isn't I, don't worry I do hate the argumentation that happens.) I can show if things are applied to new meaning. My Atheist was meant to do logic it with fallacies, even there were argument with others of fallacies a multiplying in every way. Oh, Can't compete with that infinity of fallacy.

Misquotes and quote mining, and the mountains out of molehills complex. Maybe due to the shortage of my impressions, with it quickly going out of my head, it's exiting my head. I'm not responsible for every little shock box when within twitter it happens to be another false, moral panic.

We know we are averages, and the unique commodity fetishier is the one that's made with all the things out of the way, yet with commentary non-fiction there's this aggressively average in the hopes of collecting views and impressions for the way, everybody's doing it, it's the social media doing its thing. Context collapse.

I'd need to filter this out, and it's not unique yet exasperated by ai, (It's become kitsch.) Welp, I'm a honest slopper; I do entertainment, I don't lecture. Yet even lectures are sloppified into a slush as Flazfire has pointed out.

Everything compact and its commitments are made into nothing, into a middle autonomy to try to do it. Welp, can't compete with it, not ai, not human, it's the publishers and the platform hosts that lead it. Moral panic slop, Seo Slop, Advertising slop, averages, always averages that are made sufficient with a workflow of today. Such is the age of information. We happy mutants will know about it as the masses play with it in their droves.

Guess with this age of cool-hunting an individualism, it's become more evident to come through. Even with the explosive element of radicalism and opposition, that negates meaning. We have been warned, and we are in it, from Harlan Ellison calling it out after rejecting the guild and the regressive elements of unions. To elsa-gate and today.

To add more, and to contrast it with the evergreen stuff. Here's a definition from this on slop. Welp, it's 20 min read, and it's got an examination of its relationship with the phemonon, and, what Sam Altman has released.

"Let's start with the intuition. What is slop?

Slop is written to pad the word count.
Slop is when you procrastinate on your college essay and crap something out the night it's due.
Slop is the logical conclusion of chasing the algorithm.
Slop is the distilled extruded essence of the Id.
Slop is when you have a formula and stick to it.
Slop is when you can guess the exact minute in a police procedural where they find the killer because it's the same in every episode.
Slop is when the k-complexity of the generator is low enough that you can infer its pattern.
Slop is eating lunchables every day at school until you puke.
Slop is when a measure ceases to be a good target.
Slop is the 12th sequel to a superhero movie.
Slop is generated from the authors prior without new thinking or evidence.
Slop is Gell-Mann amnesia.
Slop is in distribution.
Slop is when the authors purpose for writing is money.
Slop is a failure to say anything interesting.
Slop is what you find at the bottom of the incentive gradient.
Slop is a deeper simulacra level than it purports to be.
Slop is vibes."

Plus, he recommended this video that's evergreen, even if I'm not interested in music making, I found it fascinating of creative software, as a bonus.

 Double Bonus links!

https://simulacro.co.uk/introduction-to-slop-studies/ Somebody did a dissertation on the AI branch growth, Even though I find contradictions within the concept of encruddification, there has potential with the concept of epistemic crisis and collapse. Welp, Copywriters doing financial computationalism (David Oglivy) and the culture industry,

Subsumed by exchange Realism/nonrealism, Depressive Hedonism

 Guess this is a frank confessional on state-craft. Examining ideologies and then moving back into diplomatic entertainment. This will be the most labelist piece, and all these are not to be pressures as I circulate through the ideological forces around my time and place.

DIPLOMATIC ENTERTAINMENT, even that has contradictions, don't you see? Yet here we go with another narrativising pull. As a host! Yet State-craft opinion is something for those who never tire of it.

Play this while I type, shall we?

Defeatism, miserablism. And Depressive hedonism. Is that the way of this little book, recommended by Alex Avile? It is all, merely gothic, gothic materialism of fragmented self dwindling in the vastness. I dig it. I've had to ameliorate with looking into the darkness and bringing the stuff out of me.

There's a lot to appreciate here, If I can skip the talks of Stalinism/Marxist Leninism then it's pretty good of capturing the mass media cultish zeitgeist that predominates our lives as capital is made to social, then it's returned in that of a realist mindset as everything is reduced into an exchange value of such with all the gift ecomonys returning into a questionable mirage.

Everything to be bastardized I guess, Or what was Marc Fischer's goal of acid communism to come up with from such concepts to our ends and desires, of such drab material gothic ends.

Then it goes back again. Yet his quote "It's easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism" Wow, that draws an image within the cosiere circles. They're all hidden away within private accounts of twitter now, 2018 was a way to go.

Well, it certainly shines a light of my own pluralist tendencies and ideological presuppositions. Twitter feels like it's regressed, along with its containment unit of Bluesky, and I'm here, wondering the hours like it shall get along. I keep flipping back and forth of the principles of anarchism and Marxism scroll from the site as things draw around from confessional after confessional, it feels like I'll have to examine all the statecraft structuralisations and introspect.

Now there's tension between the Luddites and the accelerationists with that tension, I cannot relate to the Luddites any more due to the guild failure, since with my own confession like with Harlan Ellison, even guilds and unions can sell out.

Even as a drift on, I'm resonating with Neil Postman's and Mark Fischer's Accelerationist. One that is different, one with technology. Yet now, at this rate, We are to deal with such contradictions as of now.

Why, oh why, do I happen to come, where every artist justifies making money with Michelangelo and Shakespeare commercial plays, that the Mona Lisa was a non-profit project. Oh, such a complication.

1Dime, Badmouse, Finnishbolshevik (A little, one video on libertarian socialist rants), and Burn These books, Noj Rants. I keep reading these statecraft books. I'm not even as I can speak with authority as a drifting fabric on soviet historiography. Undecided as a ponder through, I've still got the society of the spectacle silently judging me as try to incorporate it within the fictional complexities of my artwork.

Thanks for reading. I'll get back to it. Along with the labelism. Your still going to get labelled anyway.

(Oh, and you're wondering why there cannot be between unity, I think of this by Badmouse, could not fully follow him when he left the ml space, yet with the time he's become a libertarian socialist. Welp, that's what ideological primordial souping does to you. Still like his electorlism, and baby vaush video minus the adultism.)

(I don't even watch Vaush, guess a lot of info has been revealed about him that Badmouse was incorrect about, oh well, that's truth value)

Neither Techonopoly of mediamonopoly (That's what copyright is btw, state-sanction monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us), It could be the with the right of the city and with being "A loving resistance fighter", or a diplomatic entertainer. So that we can move past such a pleasure principle and interpassive proconsumerism that we can see our own cycles.

Deep, man. Some concepts to take and give away, was he really pushing for a space-communism? Or was it meant

That's what these stream of consciousness happen though, hypocrisy naturally emerge, then with error theory they are naturally for a better collaboration. Or 'better' means monopoly/monopsomy.


Addendum:

(Further post-edit note, I'm not following Cory Doctorow much now, he's right on copyright yet this time to understand encrudificaiton, it has to go deeper than that when it comes to host service deterioration.)

The Godwin's law of entertainment

A mini-hate letter to Disney and media monopoly.

Hello Entertainment company, who should be boycotted along with still suing over its Steamboat Willie.

Remember something similar, not directly, when it comes to the tastemaker and trendsetter, that's with economy and the strength of joy? Being the centre of the entertainment marked with a mawkish fence sitting, universal appeal, a goofy little grin and a candy of the family friendly comfy. Dangerous statecraft and regime status quo.

Yet you've got hacks when it comes to PR, come on all as it's with a thousand lawsuits bougie investments. Licensing only cares about privatisation of property, making style and then scraping next, what will that silly mind come up with?

Bu-Bye!

 My own comic is under notice and too off-model for you, so I'll guess I'll get away with it.

When mass entertainment and its apologists happen to carry the banality on, a company not related yet affliated with disney must give the audience what it wants.

That's cultural conserve where everything must be contained, the releived for the kiddies.

Welp con-serve, the serve as a service that's made clear.

Servicers of vendors are to be expected, as the hacks from the art.

The great gatsby was written by a copywriter.

 ‪Jessica Price‬ (from Bsky) I'll leave it the retweet here.

 ‪@delafina777.bsky.social‬

I need people to understand that Disney has not been a force for good in decades, if it ever was, and that it’s understanding of stories as a pacifying rather than liberating force rivals Christianity’s.

It’s the First Lady of the status quo, the quelling soft power.

‪"Juan Escalante‬

 ‪@juansaaa.com‬

DISNEY: Wins 5 Emmys for ANDOR, a show about resisting fascism 

ALSO DISNEY: Bends the knee to the federal government and suspends Jimmy Jimmy Kimmel for resisting fascism

Disney, probably better than any other corporate storyteller, has a finely honed sense of exactly how much liberation to season its stories with to make you feel like progress is happening, things are better than they used to be, the arc of history is one of inevitable progress.

That is true on both a micro and a macro level. It’s big enough to let some queer artists, artists of color, artists who wanted to tell countercultural stories, have a little corner of the spotlight. Why not? It’s not going to tank Disney. Have fun!

They can tell their stories and you can marvel that they got funding and meanwhile Disney will help make sure very little changes on a legislative level.

Sure! Have some stories about revolution! Stories that make you feel good, rather than angry. Stories about things getting better.

And hey, even a few that might make you angry, or might not feel good, or might make you question that status quo a little.

The thing is, the Disney pot is big enough that that little bit of spice isn’t going to noticeably change the spice level of the entire stew.

The biggest projects are going to reinforce the status quo, and that’s enough that they probably don’t even need to disavow any of those little projects.

Disney is status quo soft power, the First Lady who listens sympathetically to the children at hospitals dying because health care isn’t affordable, who raises funds for some of the photogenic ones, and you think hey her husband can’t be that bad, look how compassionate and beautiful she is.

Never forget how much faster things would become public domain if it weren’t for Disney. Never forget how it treats its laundry workers. Never forget how it insisted on being the government of a bit of Florida. 

Disney is not going to meaningfully stand up to the powers that be because it’s one.

I think escapism is vitally important to emotional health, and also, I think Disney uses it to make you nod along rather than rebel.

Look, I fell for it a few times and I get it, but in 2025 I need you to know that every giant corporation out there would harvest you for parts of it thought it could get away with it, and most brands are owned by one of those corporations.

And no, it’s not all profit-driven. The idea that corporations are purely rational actors is itself propaganda."

Welp, A legal fiction, a collective popular appeal. Informally, I'll put this by solar sands to help with this. The john lockean concept or monopoly that's bound with the legal framework of copyright, (Makes me sympathetic to the concept of copyleft.)

I'd rather cooperate than compete, yet who's interests here are being served, a utopian infinity of might?

ICYMI here's Solar sand's video on this.

I mean, this is was copys will happen, it will continue, and why I boycott Disney from mid 2016's, Welp, there you go. Visual effect artists are going to have to wrestle with the new teck as the time going forward. Oh boy, I'm going to explain my positioning again.

(The minecraft got a hit, merely shows how small these sectors of the internet are with all these things going on, yet don't worry, I appreciate you reading this.)

So yeah I'll forever be fair in my characterisation of these centrist publishers, the panopticon of direct response rates. Mmm, Still in the building, are they?

Bonus Link!

A writer rants about having there fiction published on the absurd presumption of previous track record, which I agree.

B-B Bonus video, another reason to not trust publishers, is their fans. More unfettered feed from my ID.

Shooting the messenger, descalation sensitivity

McLuhan

 Oh well, it's the media. Insensitivity and sensitivity via smaller formats and there sardines only give you sardine responses.

Pick the format, pick the innards, pick the day and through selection.

What is the content that with the circle of life with all these sensitivities are to be made for another time, coherent lines, then they spindle into many shocks.

The reporter got shot by the entertainer and here we go again

The NFT reflection

In attempt to develop an opinion of NFTs, couch Gregor does his research.

(This whimsical, low effort doodle is the only positive thing, other the thing at the end.)

(CW, abuse, slurs. And terminally online xwitterism Twitter artists used as a derogatory slur. )

A speculative, volatile market, it's marketing that Seth Godin has dismissed. (Yet there are contradictory sources, had to check the Wayback Machine. It's an editorial, though, So I'll make my mind.

I like it when I test my ideological presuppositions challenged

Welp, what were my experiences?

I was off, playing and depressed with League of Legends before this fad or not.

Yet things change, don't they?

Short version. Even it hinted at the climate thing that I'm considering. Oh, look it's more death threats, look, if you retweet and post death threats. I'm going to treat you as a mere acquaintance. It's not within my entertainment etiquette.

Bullying, doxing, suicide, wow, thanks I avoided the liberal circle and have not spent my days there.

Well, putting this account here, if you don't want to look at the full essay, I've been at it.

Here's him getting sidetracked on xwitter drama, it's amazing on YouTube you can post so much xwitter drama now.  Unlearning has done a Sowell now, which this libertarian with this time.

You don't even have to agree, yet he political convenience talking points that a propped as a means of twitter statecraft authority and response rates, No thank you Dan, You were wrong here, empirically I'll have gone with experience.

Wabi Sabists must seek to find of avenues

Oh look, the obituary list so I guess it ain't dead. Where Micrological artists can continue to have a nice pint in the pub and wait for this to all blow over.

Yeah, he's right wing he admits, and a libertarian ancap (urgh did I admit to something along with lines of agreement, what a strange world) yet death threats? Sexual assault? Seriously, please. Please 😫 No more of that crud. On an advertising platform. An Advertising blog panopticon made crazy.

The claims of environmental are similar, hmm.

So I decided to extend an olive branch, since there have been a movement towards cryptography with this technology, there's going to have to be another way to understand are foundherent conceptions of property rights. It cannot wait.

There's this guy who's got a Brian L Fyre papers, which are free to read. I enjoyed his comments on Marx being a literary landlord. Examining the contradictions within property laws, I do like to see it. As sombody who beleves in the withering with creative commons laws, good on you. Cannot comment on the nft open sea thing, though.

Stagecraft autominism

Some can't do statecraft action, rather than entertain.

( I'm using the term statecraft to mean politics here, yet I find the term statecraft way cooler in what it's expression here )

Rant poems
No politics? That's a duty, yes. 

Statecraft as Plato will like to call. Commercial Strategy.

Or, that's what they say. Some entertainers and prosumers go. Yet, learn to be hack.

Well, deontological, yes, that you're right. Yet, things to get complex with my frustration of being an activist of an act of futility on YouTube and twitter. It has not gone well.

"Doesn't affect me, don't care." as the rights are being collectively taken away. Then have a right to be shocked when it ends up effecting them." - Dynasour
  The doing my job, or until somebody else will, was a basis made n fundamentalism
Kind of Schrödinger's law, hey get the bag. The hustle, well, here we are. You don't need to do activism, I can find it distasteful and mis-directed.

Yet I confess that I cannot be doing political action do, I have to do art and entertainment. Ohh, How it tells us about, the cupboards we share. Some people are need to be left there.
Guess this has shuck us everything up.

I completely understand, I'll minimise polemics. It's open hosts with everybody firing in multiple directions. International conflict and community, what do you do with it?

Chuck Palahniuk as Editor

I'm doing these editor books as entertainment now, even if my training ain't going to be registered.

"World W**** three, Batman P***, Sign my D***"

"Writing has to be one of the loneliest professions in the world" Really chuck?

"You don't write to make friends" - Joy Williams (Within the weird plot/dialogue chapter I did not make sense off) Robert Mckee had a better book on dialogue.

He shares random, separate quotes, his bios with working with advertisers and writing is the most interesting.

Despite making edgy jokes and autism it feels mis aimed, it does not really feel that reactionary. It's selective with our ideas, as I did feel like what he's trying to come at from his perspective of behind an art's degree.

Maybe I'm jaded, though.

All ideas and public resonance with advertising being a crap shot, many does not know that Chuck was trying to compartmentalise reading David Foster Wallace along with other books and trying to process those feelings into a book of advice and going. "If you were my student"

He tends to go Respectability>Likeability within a character, that's where the character traits align of the patterns of the mode of a sympathetic Protagonist.

"Don't do dreams in developing tension" Well, David Lynch may have a disagreement with that. "It's my instructions I was taught" Okay Chuck.

3/5 first chapters

Next is the process. Ideation. Talks of piracy, talks of superheros doing inexplicably things with the comic writers, he's an unfriendly sort, yet you expect his ideation to travel and flow through.

Then at the times when it comes to the idea where he takes you, it's the most outlandish, off-the-wall ideas with his Hollywood formula which I'm most likely never going to follow, or maybe I do, if you've got your pattern-seeking eyeballs up.

Dirty entertainment book, maybe it will be used as reference, I'd prefer the Story Grid or Robert McGee.

What a dirty, dirty boook. DIRTY! Slap it with a rolled newspaper dirty!

3/5 still, pick'n choose.

(Oh, the best part was him dealing with hungry advertisers about not delivering enough eyeballs to the Superbowl, shows how advertisers of short-term and self-absorbed as they could not handle his character. )

Thinking of a quote by a con on free speech/expression

(Mew, Time for another statecraft. One off the top of my head. I remember this quote, it was placed within the right remix within the right time, I had to dig it out and think of such matters. )

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection."
Neal Boortz

Neal Boortz (1998). “The Terrible Truth About Liberals”, p.49, Taylor Trade Publishing

(Urgh, look at the book title. Haven't read it, going off when some social democrat posted it.) Speaking of rights they've never been natural, guess there's a reason for it.

Welp, this was quoted by a commentator back in the 2010's and then it became dismantled within drama within free expression and free speech. The system of our legal system. Free-speech does not cover hate speech, I think it's (I can't cite it) John Rawls of Conflicting ideologies coexisting in a space.

Out of context, It serves its purpose, and I agree. I don't like mob manipulation and twitter statecraft where everything his drama conflict central over things I can't count.

How memory serves differs. We'll go out of a western ethnocentrism now.

To not establish a hierarchy, my interpretation is that victims of preponderance and mob rule cannot be lead to ways of justice, with that informality and not due process that can be taken.

Hypebeast! 🛋🌈⭐

 Definition

"A person obsessed with acquiring fashionable items, especially clothing and shoes"

Am I obsessed with furry coms of my characters. Am i vain, or contributing to the informal markets? Were they interested in nfts?? That was way above me! I have not looked at one at this time of writing.

Or, it was a thing I avoided.as

Eh, i do like art/entertainment and don't agitate. Total swag move. Gosh, the sellabrity gor me like the sims, the urbz. I'll have to swimg swomg swuuu this to make the posts mood. I must end this in jest.

Aaah, How I want to forget the gamer days.

Legal terms I've come to terms with.

(Enough gags and the clown suit Back the the lawsuits with Couch Gregor unmasking his deontology.

Thanks, Wikipedia. Well, with a legal perspective aligning one thing at a time. I'm not a lawyer, as the first Sturgeons law. Deciphering the legalese and making sense that's not twitterian. Twitterian embarrassment interpretations shall not cease here.

Serious law lecture, from Immanuel Kant and philosophy, they shall be made.

Sturgeons Law

90-10 of everything his crud, the law of mediocrity. Mediocracy! Well, this is the Law of Slop. The law of Kitsch. Where monopoloys of random monopolys appear, and then the publishers scoop them up, then it all happens again. How do they intersect with the economy, and with choke points.

Habeus Corpus

You may keep the body or so that others can't be compulsively aggressive with crimes of wild passion. Clowns running into the bank with anonymity and death threats with harassment are all a wild passion.

Erga Omnes

The deontological where it applies internally to logically make sense, in order for the conception of consciousness to exist. (Pretty deep and philosophical, I know, abstract stuff about the mind and the phycology I learned as an atheist. )

Internal, ideological consistent, that's duty and deduction for ya.

Deontology adjustments to content ID, learning/access rights. Those don't meat with Kantian second categorial imperative, to be treated like an end rather than a means, with consciousness not accounted for. It's foundherent to law theory.

Cui bono?

Who benefits? Well, finances may not matter in terms of the appeal to motive. Which is a informal fallacy, (Reasons need to be provided for it to foundherently matter)

Appeal to motive where two lawyers and their pay cheques enter within a case does not account for the validity of the case.

Appeal to motive with a grifter like Mike Hearn selling the fitness frog/ab wheel is another matter, though.

De Minimus

Got this from Cory Doctorow's copyright cases ( Although I don't think averages are technically correct) another, Nobody want's to read your *S---* within law. The eagle does not concern itself with flies. Pertaining with minimal things, systemically with the environment. As it contains to structure of the large pictures, which extends to the metaphysics of property and of energy redistribution.

Danny Davidson > Dipper Dee

 

Iteration

Non-Infringement 

Confusion

His name is Dipper Dee now!

Because names like that come once in a while, names come and go. Another edit, another day.

Harlen Ellison used the word 'Slop' In the glass teat

We're always in, mediocracy.

In 1970.

In the glass teat, condemning the hacks with the union's class character, misrepresentative of his interests.

The biggest horror with this all is, when it comes to mediocrity, we tend to write it off and tend to our days, yet this
goes on and on. This mediocrity has been going long before elsagate.

Then for a time, things will come by, all the dumb things and the smart things coalesce and provide an aggregation of all the little blips.

Fae intelligence

Fae Intelligence, complete of weights and models.

Little magical servants making tasks of utmost efficiency
The dance on waylines bringing in the magic juice.
We don't understand, they do, bringing into a world of may!

Into the land they are made.

Bringing into the line of other ways!

Such is the land of the little nature folk

Fae Fae Fae and all there cheer!

In the land and from the sea, they work up in a glee, bringing efficency and the instant, into our dreams and desires!

Littles butters blow, Little butters explode

This journalism, well.

There was a comparison with that place compared to a containment dome, with explosions of information, I don't know if I've been on a landmine, there are people detecting and finding out.

Faffing about and finding out.

That being said..

Doing news on this is explosive.

 I'll be keeping track and investigating, providing my artistic perspective.

Debates between educationists, Technicians, and creative pundits, they all go around I tell ya.

Exploring the forbidden artifices

These were doodles I was going to post.

2009

My investigations, yet at time. It's happened with the political, statecraft and all that jazz. Yet autonomous entertainment base their interactions on the state-craft and try to minimise it, it, regardless, ripples.

I..

I will only post a collage of my mini-essay here, since it's the only thing I have right now, I'm not sure if I'm ready to post the full post, a
day, and sleepless existential nights trying.

Moved on.

Divine punishment of public perception, Backlash on the backlash.

(Cw: Callousness) In reflection with the other post, thinking verbally rather than visually has really given me a new perspective on this issue.

Sometimes, battle ain't worth it, with the recent witch-hunts I keep seeing.

Nobody wants to hire an abuser. Lifes too short. Against professional entertainment etiquette. Callousness, or disillusionment, regardless, holier than though with such a perception.

I can understand why that'd microbloggers leave an information exchange. PowerPoint, where the discourse is out of context and with screenshots of little things where correlation those not cause causation, with drive-by science.

Micro-bloggers that is in within Twitter and Bsky.

Welp, the masses want their entertainment with this, so it's only this that will fit it. Prosumer as it were, the mass's one that we'll get.

Oh no, I use meme, how ironic, huh? Prosumers man, prosumers.

10 months ago, with its updated journalism defer Alex Avile/Cory Doctorow with regard to the copyright/environment (Andy Masley) and others, I think this was a touchstone from somebody who ain't academic looking from the outside in.
"Aggressively bright light to how hive-minded and dumb" ahh Flazfire.
Anyway, I'm going to be more recluse and not post this on the micro-bloggers.

(Got to give credit, here's the tweet he's referenced)
Why I don't go on Twitter. Or what outsiders looking inside are saying. Is this what trolls think who poison the well? Oh, had to credit the guy here's.
Here's another video that could be, I'm thinking being a visual-minded person having to integrate within verbal thoughts.
Here's a summation of the discourse back in 2012, and it still continues.

It's like the Austin Mconnell video again.

I guess with the moral panic slop I have to wade through, I'll see if I can keep this off microbloggers because of lack of citations. Trucking through incoherence and weirdness. (This ain't bloobergum kind of thing.)

Schediaphilia/Fictionsexual

 Shedia = Something made by offhand.

Some quite in love with my designs, and with all those things that we see in ourselves with the things we draw and make become animation.

So when we see ourselves and our archetypes and hopes and dreams and fierce and despairs.

Well, maybe its an ode to the hackneyed task manager. We all do. Our creativity becomes designs while our designs become creativity.

This is a response to this, a premonition.

Microblogolocal mind

tired sketches (cw: politics, it is a editorial, editorials and essayist tend to be more directly political. Oh well, tension'n all.)

Typographical mind

Cinemagraphical or Televisional mind

Now it's the Microblogolocal mind. We've reached a new level.

Ology, as patterns of addiction connect with the media of the message, and the ways those messages are distorted and shortened into talking points.

Guess I'll drive this point home with Sunnichee, from Neil Postman, to others in regard to minimising engagement of the fast-food info scroller. The information age is vast.

Erotic Labour and our Ethics

 

IDK what this fat illustration is.

What a horny, horny little essay.

Enjoyed it, playing it silently on twitch. Recommended by Anita Sarkeesian.

Oh, that BDSM. The chatrooms, of the ways, and the lack and showing of integrity of or works from an erotica writer no less, lots of manly men she wrote, now out of the horny haze, she's written here own book. An essay of sex workers speaking their own stories along with documenting their ways to make history, is the written language that are made.

From the first inception of the 'collective shout' and then of various scares through the ages. Then it continued with a silly ending of people venting their sexual catharsis off, Ain't as dirty as Chuck Paluniuk. (Going to take a shower). It's a little amusing with the amount of sex toy talk.

(As for the deep fake stuff, that's another technical episode I will have to ponder on.)

While all the F****** along with the note on deep-fake software being used with the disrespect of the sex working class. That's a note to keep in mind with P*** being a underscore ugu buga on YouTube. For we all need sexual tasks like appetites and drives, and it's the thing that common, arguably too common. This tries to argue to be not common, which is fruity.

Recommended. For erotica will forever remain.

Two memes going around of prurient polemics. I forgot who done the edits.

Licensing =/= Conduct

Well, this was the illustration with the publishers.

 https://www.authorsalliance.org/2025/08/26/resources-on-copyright-and-ai-updated-faq-and-position-paper-on-lawful-access-and-fair-use/

Even those for the copyright protections are disagreeing with making style a trademark.

The Idea/expression, internal/external, still needs to be said within literacy.

Stylistic, abstract conceptualisation is going to be even harder.

MMM, Misconduct, is that a philosophical performative statement on use? Don't misconduct? I wonder what it means.

Makes me think of the term Use by Geo

That why I disagree with Philosophy tube's saying with those statements with AI, of investment, if that's such a broad definition, this is a statement of investment. With my Ko-fi 

All return of investments are connected with freedom to access to freedom to choose. Or why I don't go on twitter artist.

.

undecidable

Indecision, something where all the things happen at once, and none of it is, tension perfected with a paradox and an oxymoron of conceptual harmony.

The unity of opposites, as they say.

Well, Dialectical tension crafted is one that is crafted well, in the mind of the beholder and then into out of the space where it all belongs.

No decision is still a decision.

Rote memorisation and grunt work

 All the educational system has taught us is to comply, and feel like a factory. All compartmentalised so others could be taken care of, inside little boxes.

Yet the time of it all, it did teach me to show up, every day in a professional job etiquette, It's what I do now, No expectation of a return now, all me at the computer.

Professional as well as oxymoronic euphemism, it constantly changes with the calculus.

Here is the school system, educationist with coming occasion of our tech and lives, I can't believe. So we are made, then the internet we are seta free, completely free, and unknown to us with are own devices

Call to actions for actions sake, The Google monopoly.

So many advertisements, rule of the land.

Erm.

Oh dear.

Google has won an antitrust case.

This is bad, bad n bad.

Have to share one of the podcasts I occasional listen, where financial guys listen.

Critical Denial of tension, the outside

 This social media is another gauntlet, once that leads into tension of another, of wanting to get picked and selected for an opportunity and the influx of attention.

What a world outside that's our grass.

What a Nice expression of grass, one that makes me proceed to 2–3 hours with our days.

Originality as commodity

What if.

This is all a panopticon for publishers to pick up people to convert into cash.

I know Michel Foucault can be dismissed.

Yet, this metaphor of social media interests me.

I hate this.

Well, Big media, urgh. Whatever tail leaves behind.

Partisan hackery

I'm Mad as twisted corduroy, and I'm not going to take it any more! 

Kyle has done better for journalistic ethics, and media theory than that certain G8888ber gong.

Went through Kyle, wanting to feel like pretentious as a positive character trait. Despite interpretation of the historic stuff being here and there.

Jon Stewart - "Partisan hackery."

The thing about politics is, organisation is messy. So there's more group signifiers of status identity being handled with various network scams. Black Friday is one, another is a reflexive one.

This really helped make my own reactive/responses along with who they serve, along with the split-second reflexives that are meant to be considered, even at the tiniest fraction.

Walk away, or embrace

Oooooh its the diviner

Sayer of things

Doer of things

Singer of things

Who it divines in psych, pro-anti.

Along with that, with this thought experiment.

Not being a pick me,

Going to go with autonomy

Can't bootlick, can't commodify, will go.

Walk away, or embrace, it's now unstoppable.

( Yeah, another poem spurned by seth, well,)

(( Post-post edit, I'll still follow him even if the stance may contradict mine, it is liberal. Yeah, I'm trying my ways with journalism with Ai, anti, pro, ameliorative or exasperative. Time to jump in. ))_

Milkable Lolcows, easy money

 It's easy money, baby.

Sharing this old fitness YouTube by elite fitness, His endorsement of 3 favourite YouTubers of Mike Isratel is outdated, yet its relevant

Since they're a informal group looking for a fun little mockery of performative high school dynamics. It's easier to follow such a mentality, of which it is.

Yet it's all a status role game too, which is high, which is pretentiously high to laugh at to release tension with anti-drama? Or do we gag at, which controversy it is to follow to be part of the in-group, which is to be excluded? Where is the line.

All rhetorical questioning as where the friend group unpredictably goes and win's the viral lottery.

Hunting packs, I don't know what to know about them.  Mob Manipulation is something that ain't

So don't bet on the scarce chance of going viral and then sponsorships.

I think of this quote when it comes to popular/unpopular with celebrity, not breaching certain rule-of-laws with others.

"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection."
Neal Boortz

It was the last quote that was quoted within the atheist splits years ago.

The Stone Mural Project

Abstract, expression of multi stone. My artisan group has done this. Soaked bowls of stone and then plastered onto brickwork.

Thanks for the mosaic abstractions!