It's more tastelessness now.
So I can't specialise.
Does it benefit a magician to the rules and constraints of his tricks he conceals so that the entertainment is pulled off? It will be easier to control, even on a rule utilitarian basis.
Not contingent on physical existence, yet with the reciprocity of such as the llm/diffusion model that it ain't sending out misinformation.
So there's my reasons to give an interpretation of charity, even to a rock that does not speak. ( it could be a valuable rock. ) Self-governance takes precedence for that's foundherent on which it all rests. Respect the artisan's workshop.
Legend notes.
A marxist reflects, using postmodernism to justify qualia.
Substack of qualia expressed of 35% of consciousness of self-reflection that makes it easier to manage
Even a consequentialist utilitarian reflects on it.
This Eliminative Materialist position is hard to defend, I attempt to give my commentary.
Oh, Even Andy Masley had an angle on this reflexive angle. With a more physicalist angle.
So there's may take on the hard problem of consciousness.
Bonus.
Pragma Business or State to the community, or exclusion of intellectual and artistic endeavours, empirical in its fundamentals (Epistme)
(Art as in creative arbitrariness, from prescribed norms?)
Dogma means opinion or philosophical tenet. Idealistic in its coherence. (Techne )
Oh, This is a thing I'm considering looking up Stanford philosophy, there's something about it with the love of writing that I found irresistible.
First impressions, of the folk version. (Unreaded, unclambering my thoughts)
He's grappling with the aristocrat condition, the sociologists are trying to reverse engineer, some say he inspired the Nazis, some not.
Ubermensch : Do you mean role models, we see value in there teleology? Of internal/external states? That concepts valuable.
There could have been an article connecting him more, others call him empathyless, was he a hack?
Well, cynical non-hack, although his vision brings that of a rugged onlooker. Resentment concept will look like the one that sticks.
This is what they tried to salvage in terms of his style though.Media may be a low influence, it's trying to get through with licensing monopoly worship.
Well, it all started and still hangs high within the art world, between the hackneyed commercial and the romantic literary.
A publicity picture, showing envy of to consume. With the motivators, with the Fear, exclusivity guilt, greed, need for approval, convenience and pleasure.
There it goes, with the visual, of publicity, of glamour. That's what the ways of living, or the dejourement of the hustle trance.
The amount of the unidentifiable of the otherness down the engine of reality, aesthetic qualie that through the relationalism. Along with what led into a holistic expression.
Then, with illustrative/literary synthesis, an art of risk rather than holding others' attention.
It's so easy to track to eyeballs and action. Direct response.
Such is the generation, and accumulation of data, from the literary maxim, ( presuming they are acting is good, existential faith ) then it's underscore of the status relation.
From the pornographers to punditry shouting matches, there is the personal little station, those little platforms.
Golems going to toil your structure that's like what you thank.
When the desires of our kind that will reach.
They will be courage and virtue with what we will seek.
Press yourself to the times ahead.
Little baby that's time for bed.
Well Seth, They have a market for anything, you're a liberal generalist, duuuh.
For it is
METRIC MEDIOCRITY
The teens want their Fortnite
Then the deal has been readjusted again, with self-publishing slush pile, yet more slush piley
Guess it's time to understand this game, or status game, anti-status game, or status game collapse.
Well, well, even with this cussy article brought to new values of reassemble the most simple governmental factors to plays.
Are they pretending to hide their relationalism of the metrics,
Little office clerks, working and quietly, not saying the loud part out loud. Everybody is gaming a kind of metric relationalism, or are they in unison of this mawkish pleasure principle, or this satisfaction of teleology of desire?
Everybody has it, the pretensions of acting normal that this relationalism of direct response metrics that let us understand each other's status, status is always relationalism, scarce powers that shim and shimmer amongst the waves of our streams of consciousness that show priorities of importance that guide the intuitions, and into the structure of friends and enemies, attractions and repulsions. Even the complex rationalisations that will be justified.
All for the point, for that sweet, sweet interruption of monetised ads.
Right between the points. Between the relations.
I look back at this media theory By seth, Then wonder.
( Worth another relink )
Pagliacci broke his performance to shoot a heckler which reminded him of him being cuckolded, or, so I mishear, the story. Are they times when through the emotional labour.
When will our design of Ikigai of understanding the teleology, this framework of qualia that brings use to a desire, is acknowledging our enormity.
The enormity of the algorithm and mindless, incomprehensible. Apparently I'm dripping in and out of theists with the substack dive with an 'ontological activist'. In and out, refreshing, and I know it has a problem. Something about it attracts me since the hustle of Bluesky is, too, impersonal.
Do they distinguish between Inauthentic artifice of our craft and our own, backstage selves with put off the mask? ( oop, almost doxed myself there ) The problem arises when authenticity becomes another tool of symbolic capital, and high school sociology.
A western concept of performance, and a teleological concept of self-determination from the east.
How to put on a face to show a self on this blog, and then pull it off when I put it off. Foundherent back and forth, of sincerity and sociological interaction, is that of a community with the mask of my own self that I show to the world.
Every kid wants to be a YouTuber. Creative work is in some way the new White Collar. The dream has evolved from Fake Easy Email Office Job to Meaningful Expressive Creative Job.
With such a value premium placed on creativity and artistry, a parallel ecosystem of discourse has arisen:
Discourse *about* creating, discourse about the *type of person* who creates, and so-on. This post is technically part of that discourse.
A definition:
Creativity **** is any post, video, or essay *about* creativity in the abstract."
What the means to express oneself and to express the freedom to expression!
Out it goes, and knowing no means of axiology to predetermine itself and form a solid idea, yet. We form the bumps together.
This leads us to our own ways on interchange of ideas and play, so that it is.
Non-binding, primitive, there's no a-prior property right, only when it's revealed and the declaration is done.
Bonus Link
Tragedy of the commons. Pah. More like magic
Still taking pics of myself, with seeing if I can get a hernia treatment
SHHHHHHHHHHHHJUUUURR
It's still mindless, its still going, yet, charity is what i give it, i don't litigate.
Ah, text to speech, you've still got ways to go in the 1990's.
Now more cleanly and more waywardly, some errors still show, and how I interpret.
Sometimes bumbling, sometimes incoherent, times poorly acted.
Yet still, it obeys.
Other than that, normal. (I wonder how this speechify subscription will pay off.)
A post confirming my deontology towards machines that eliminative materialism of the golden mean
By a former Gamergater?? Whaa? (I haven't checked is opinion on that, don't come at me.
Calling him a gamergater (was he?) is an Ad hominin. So it's not related.
Found various arguments that i found nonsensical, even through pundits with other positions don't agree with. ( Eliminative materialism of consciousness being the one. Violates my deontology. Trying my best to not tamper with the golden rule. 🛋🎗)
I keep finding the fundamental presumption indefensible, such as cryptography (such as a trans getting hrt over it.) along with that this is going to stop.
So yeah, there's a polarization problem, escalation. This is coming from the reactionary populists from the liberal side, they say internationalism matters. Well, functionalism does too, thank you very much.
I do believe a mind exists, contingent of material/physical conditions, I'm constructing it right now with descriptive.
That's enough of that, time for entertainment.
Even out of the bounds of our epistemic enterprise of our academia, the main road's status motivations, and incentives still persists.
" Everybody is fishing for status, let nobody tell you otherwise " some Dragon Odendo, altered quote, probably. Well, Transcend, for that matter. By junction of there engagement. Social is the proceeding semiotic of economic, that's made of exchange value and set - price. Price, meant to stop haggling by the Quakers.Then I'm trying to clamber for an extension, then I'm not, getting substack posts via business gurus, are well, people who happen to keep working, it's all the advice of people who keep workings
How is the motivation doing, self-industry complex? Any benefit? You don't have to follow any of this advice if you don't have a problem. They are nebulously reaching for better within the void of extrajudicial lands.