Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Hobbyist media theorist. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
Venn diagram of industrial and artisanal modes of production! Marxist doctrine, a go-go.
Industry its stuff of labour and professionalism, and the firms. Right to the artisanal.
Marx, Keysein and the Marginal Austrian one with theory of economic value, scarcity to make a product.
Artist implies creativity of an individual, not a collective (Even if they have style guides and a place and trace.) Thats the industry of arc! Taylorism and Fordism combined to make it with scientific management.
So, The mode of production is required to ascend from hackneyed to creative. Select the factory, select the future.
Industrial hacksmenship, or marginal cost and value vis the artisnship of labour value. (That's the doctrine of Marxism for ya)
Graphic design and Illustrator, industrial, Contemporary art not so much.
There it is again, Commercial and Literary distinction again.
If anybody DARES conceive out her propereity domain,
Then she ZAPs them, like the emperor who has such a high status, the subject dies when looking at them.
Her likness in you mind? ZAP.
Her Face? Zooop. Even the word Cast? Zappers.
Burnt to a crisp, merely like that, a nothingness of not being able to conceive as she owns the word the and 99% of writers have perished based on here benevolent rule!
You can only pull from thin air, and all ethers as all ideation is contingent to her!
Observe. An idealism within her natural law! Of Golden abundance!
Badmouse said that streamers earning fame ( or infamy symbolic relatable capital ) and money hinders the overall struggle.
I say, yeah as an activist, no as an entertainer. Yet, do these editorials say otherwise, ho ho ho, well, you do encourage me Harlen.
Staying in sync is the most important of all these.
Since streaming is the best take to be able to manage ones one personal space, there's no editing, one clear distinction between editing (non-sync) and unediting (sync).
Leaving a trail, editing along the genealogy of ideas to pluck out moments of consciousness. That is one sense, to bring verisimilitude with the work.
So I'm going to dive into a excommunicated character. Time to commentary time with my impressions.
Yes, I'm posting this. IDC if you disagree, and you see this as an endorsement. Cussy things asides with all the amounts. Here's he goes with the labour theory of value.
As with gatekeeping, well, better to gatekeep creative commons rather than copyright doctrinaire. Each vote of that only legitimises the system. (That's an anarchist saying)
I've had to my commentary with Hbomberguy and Innuendo,We may have had differences with the movie such as c*ties with me agreeing with feminists Podcast episode, that's here and there.
Oh and the content, I've simmered on that. It's capitalisms perverse incentives and race to the bottom, really. Any sociological, foundherent analysis yet nobody is calling the obvious thing out to Hbomberguy.
Wow, he's got excommunicated by the copyright doctrinaires! Woopsy. Going to abstain my judgement of the J. K. Rowling thing. Guess he's right to call out the harassment campaign of the liberal apologists of certain issues now left-coded.
(Even when then, Innuendo's This is Phil Fish video has passed in the past. He's doing presentations of thought terminating clichés now. Strongly Agree.)
Commentary channels with this Though over the word content means there's still some hope, along with left unity never being a thing since it's harder to accomplish, that's a good thing. Welp, with my own opinion of the content/format distinction being a non-sequitur.
It's gone south, though, along with Stephanie.
What happens with those full of social media capital of Symbolism and relatability do now? Get Sad and leave, or mad and try to consolidate and control. Have to agree with that. Yeah, Opinion has lowered.
Oh yeah, I've discovered his position on Ukraine for the moment, and I support their right to self-determination. Frantz Fanon Self-determination.
Agreements
Gen AI and propriety copyright
Fanboyish elitism
Understanding Sociology/neoliberal, and consumerism is not worker.
Prosumerism
The term content is a mindless pop contest Malthusian Documentary one is strong. Content Elitism (I get that, the socialisation of our production and our product privatisation. There a sliver of truth there amongst its commercial/prosumer uses.)
Disagree
Certain geopolitical issues. (Maybe here and there though, Idk Already here and there.)
My emptiness that he may of not read Susan Hacks Foundherentism.
Gatekeeping, I'm suspecting more of moral panic and status role. Pearl cluting.
If I gave a completely arbitrary game review score 7/10 for this self publisher. I may even seek out his book.
Was in my research folder, is this the group he mentioned?
I'll steel man this then give a balanced take. On such a unbinding, unenforced legalese. Non state sanctioned.
In the void of the internet, there is no duty, no service, the long tail of distribution. From the pundit pot stirrers, to the Kardashians trying to look their concept of cute. Yet, social media is sold to the advertisers or the society of subscriptions. Vendors, serviceability.
It shows that this could be an entertainer, not a lecturer of governance, education, journalism, religion . Focusing on televisual rather than typographic expression; showmanship.
Since fiction is the legalese used for state protection for specific expression, not natural law.
This may suspend proselytisation and ideological presumptions of the viewer. All being part of a campaign.
So no controversy, politics imply two states at tension'n conflict. Along with fictional drama being within the subject. That's a charitable view. Keeping one's head down from the pot-stirring provocateur.
However, it's like a butler saying "It's not my job to have an opinion" it does bring questions, since it is not natural law anyhow.
I cannot tell the intentions of such an entertainment-ese layer. Since Interpretation and scrutiny of the media is used to help provide meaning. All the ideological presumptions will be guessed and speculated on, along with whether it being direct like satire or propaganda.
Whatever we reach and whatever we think. (Such as the clock metaphor, clock is the measurements of matter, the sociology of goals to tell the time.)
Right reasons, wrong reasons, undefined! Wow. Interpretation can matter.
Because i'm not a gamer! ohh, maybe i'll snoop in your podcast and five years. I'm a freelance contract worker who happens to do
I agree with him with licensing here along up until AI which I'm not sure he's clarified about. I'm sure he's mislead. Legitmate fears, well, enjoy a lot of dildos and adult themes in this. (Dildo references), Lot's of sex toys
I can't find myself enjoying 95% cases of licence. Wish it was consistent.
Replace EA with 'Disney' and replace customers with Independent artists. Class analysis and dialectical materialism.
Despite my disagreements, I did enjoy his video on Bogwarts. All of them.
It goes south with her reaction to the AI thought, Peter Coffin, Alexander Avile, Sunny'm Cheax, Andy Masley have responded better.
Now I'll see if I can make with Peter Coffin, being the citizen investigator I will have to see his own way with the ai. Oh She's wrong on NFTS too. So, I must do my bid adieu as a customer and not follow.
Tribalism, other than the colonial implications. Has its own sparring of power.
Or what they say about informal groups. Status and governance.
Why is everybody thinking everything a trial to declare verdict on microbloggers?
Everything a villain? Everything a verdict. Complete in curiosity across with the microblogging mind, the amount of discourse is the take it in an amount, time to vary the way.
I'm seeing the reliance of willing misinformed opinions within the west. Relying on Ayn Rand, and now there are more pundits than every trying to out-do each other. Guess this is why we still have the academics.
As a general rule, don't bother if it takes a bibliography, since you got to stay in sync with oneself.
They did not have the insight. It does not deal with our desire for modernism. People cannot wrestle with the idea that there are times when, even with the crisis theory provided my Marx, they're still our tools and still another day.
I'll have to get out of this baby leftist mindset and see that how others cannot get their education from streamers and microbloggers. I can't learn from a Laggard, they can't be reached. So to stay in sync with myself.
First volume of capital I've tried to read. Try and get a correct interpretation, yet with this postmodern quote-mining wave of hyperreality. I'll go with this one.
"the artisans are behaving like politically destructive rent-seekers and trying to reduce automation instead of seeking meaningful political change concerning ownership of capital and allocation of resources" is also orthodox marxist
the entire idea of fixed capital is that workers individually do not necessarily own the means of production; like, whether or not they morally should own their output, they do not, that is not how the thing works, and the social arrangement for large factories makes it complex to even try to do
-
i do think however that marx is correct on the basic points of
1) automation is good
2) luddism is bad
3) the problem is who controls the automation, and the wealth created by it, and who gets left out
4) the solution ultimately has to be the power of the state"
@bitesu.kawaii.social "the luddites were not pro workers rights they were not a labor movement they were artisans and workshop owners and guild members who were financially threatened by industry because factories could produce textiles far cheaper than their poorly paid apprentices stop with this ahistorical nonsense
they were reactionaries who were opposed to progress because their own private enterprises were outcompeted by a new mode of production. "pro workers rights" like they weren't all guild artisans who had their own sweatshops where apprentices did all of the work please read some actual theory and actual history for gods sakes or you're going to fall back into the trap of carrying water for petit bourgeois reactionaries impeding progress. not a single marxist with two brain cells to rub together is going to say "we have to go back before capitalism " cause that's the whole point!! new modes of production and new modes of social organization pave the way forward to newer yet modes of production and organization, some of which can even facilitate socialism (like industrial modes of organization. for example)"
(Oh and Ned Ludd ain't real, Brian Merchant is doing revisionist history.)
So Industrial mode of production =/= Artisinal Mode of production. That's the matter of the modernisation that we will do, moving forward. Reading with literature and the textbook
So the answer is.
NAY 👎🛋! Reject this Petit bougiese impulse and show sympathy to the industrial/working class who can't afford the artisanal modes of production
Along with the pull of plopyright shifts us to atomised alienation, resist the pulse! Gift economies, Pro bono, Creative commons licensing as alternatives.
Support Ghostwork and Turkpoticon and ignore the clown dogmatism at microbloggers.
They're basically going to go nowhere, like selfish Ayn Ryandists, and Male supremacist movement that happened within 2016 and then disappeared into obscurity. Ron Paul Supporters too! - It all comes around.
I don't even identify as a Marxist doctrinaire given how diverse my thought is with sociology'n all economical analytic thought, the way the west with it's movement are silly.
I will read more literature and textbooks on automation, yet we must shift our automation to replacement to reassembling, revolting along with the anti-trust of monopoly.
I Shall end with a quote from the Lorax
The Lorax
"What do you want? Shut down the factories? Make the workers lose all their jobs?" "You have your point, Yet I don't know the answer" ~ Dr Suess, Despite my many disagreements with him. What an interesting paradox of handling our growth of our society, hmm?
Mass commodified content designed for kiddies evaporates from my brain from how easy consumable it is, guess the big-wigs knew, doing some thinking. I can't remember a Mr Beast video.
Well, it's not for me. Kids do love it, Not going to Junophobia it though, this is a thing with social media though, everybody comes and run it down to the ground, from everypart.
Guess FlazzFire has gone the edutainment route and deciding on to be a comedian, taking the vulgarism with it and writing like Chuck Palunuik.
My fave part of this collage.
I'll keep following him. Cussy as it is, not as Academically rigorous. Welp, that's the problem with the plot/spectacle of Aristotle.
Happy Halloween! Here's a off-the-cuff essay by a philosophy student wanting literacy.
Yet I know I'll have to deal with mass communicating towards an illiterate audience outside.
What convinced me was Neil postman. Even with my Art Director brain that I have to learn at literacy, I haven't had to chance to read all the socialism books so that's why some of my feed are videos, so even if I'm not literate, I'm aware of the changing concepts closely rela
Otherwise, you get Vaush, missed that train, or Ed Zitron.
I call this new strain the prosumer leftism, which is absorbed within itself of its own social media bubble. Or wilfully misinformed leftism.
Yet with the right/left graph and the political compass, I'm going to have to do another post on that.
Start of walk today, then it ended in lanterns. No appetite for the potatoes as a brought back one with the swan.
It's the celebration of lanterns, making time out of zines with my manners, and it's all the family thing.
I do keep promises of keeping family first, all those streams I do are mearly sprinklings of an entertainment guy who decided to stream to get in tune with the project.
Why oh why, I'm following the journalists' path, it shall be wretched as it was. I don't know if an opinion is binding, and litigation of summoning the eyeballs.
Everybody can editorialise (except for Alex Jones on platforms) Everybody can 'copyright' and media w**** out at the exchange value and not the use value as Karl Marx.
Even if the labour theory of value may be the thing, and automation will have to be rethought.
Welp, thank you for reading these thought patterns.
Beep boop, read my wires boy, read my robutt wires.
That's it! I'm reading a book because the copyright wingers using there existance on abolshing fair use are too much.
So I decided to try to get my moneys worth via reading research in this discovery of llms/diffusion models.
(Even if it's bad, I've read Ayn Rynd, is this comparable? Part of the writer's training! HOOOOOOOOOO!) Lets see how much this fascinates or tires me.
2023 Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick
I've changed my opinion
Starts with explanations of weights, and token prediction. Existential risk and ethics, lawsuits, Japan, ethics discussion. This if it's all a matter of understanding what the tech can do in terms of capabilities and incapabilities is going to really have to see through.
These four rules are his tenets that he elaborates on for a possible alternative with dealing with the tech, how people hide, how people use it, and what are the possible sci-fi futures that move along it. Here's his Ai Research blog.
I shall put him in the neutral AI category and better-reporting-that-Ed-Zetron-box. I'm going to keep his machine inferences under wraps.
Guess this is under the editorial because somebody having a nuanced take on machine learning is impossible now with this naughty journalist seeking those hot, HOT scoops! It's over-editorialised now, huzzah.
Doomerist to the anti. I really like this book. 5 stars, Americana angst like Infinite Jest. Fully recommend.
It's the way that's the, Humiliation machine, of insecurities.
The scene of the drama coming from the phone and the tension between the drama inside the internet and then
Then all the doom'n gloom with the discourse of ai, woman, the world, and misery, all ending in a place that's most hopeful. Where all the characters are made to go through waves and then the ending of the legelese, mwa. Being a internet dweller, I have to get off with all this long tail of discourse that we all sit in.
(This was shared with a programmer, btw Non-attributional to me.) Is this what is foretold? New positioning is developing, new tribes and informal groups are forming, people are picking, people are selecting.
Another Cartesian graph. I'm going to have to make another.
Is this the future with the things are going?
Regardless if a publisher likes it or not. On all the platforms. There's a whole world out there, with all the manners and matters.
The coders are keeping it hidden, and I guess I don't want to budge. Great thing about being a long-form blogger, that is the micro-bloggers may not read this. Certainly hating prosumer such more.
(this was from Ethan Mollick, who's into tech journalism, foundherently better. Will be reading his book. )
Phrenology, and you are the product with prosumer ai-detection.
Well, even with doctrinaires still madden me. Here's idea/expression dichotomy. The law does not protect genre, good one too. Idea's can't be selecting, they're collectively owned by the commons, and then there's the way that I'm going to happen. Expand the conception of copyright till it's impossible.
whenever someone suggests that a webtool can detect AI images, I do check them against: 1. a digital illustration 100% hand drawn by me 2. a photomanipulation created by me 3. a video game screenshot, unedited and taken by me so far, not a single "AI detector" has ever got 2 out of 3 correct that is WORSE THAN USELESS. "Determining which images have been created or altered with generative tools" isn't even a use case for gen-AI, somehow okay, well, that's your right, OP, but just so you know the linked tools were: wasitai.com [failed 1 and 3, correctly identified 2 as "not AI"] and thehive.ai/apis/ai-gene... [failed 2, said 3 "might include some AI elements", correctly identified 1 as "not AI"] usually I delete quote posts if the OP blocks me but I guess I'll let this one circulate, it's important to be aware of the limits of these apps. the best tool for detecting generated images and text is and remains: your human eyeballs. sorry
Magic bullet solutions
Video on educational applications.
Education industry complex, what are you going to do huh?
(There's a reference to gentilia storage.) Averages, I do not mind making a stream of consciousness response/reaction, yet at this time it's all meant to be forgiven. Time for another way.
You want to see a dead body?
Yet with all this computationalism, with Ai being the medium and the metaphor, it's now a claim ot explore this and how it's deplored. It's like we are in the stage of where with our media, it's becoming our metaphor with learning what it means to distribute our labour into our hands.
This content farm will continue and fix what is not broken. Delivering to their audience fast and cheaper, it's react-slop like them all.
Well, Thank you, Hume Is-ought gap, between exchange value and use value, and with direct response marketing and brand marketing in this age of information age.
What's on the marxist labour theory of value tube today? What's on the woob tube? I'll keep editorial control here and commitments.
In Couch Gregor attempts to have an opinion on statecraft. See this as the research scrapbook where I draw inspiration on where to fictionalize.
BadMouse, some say he's gone ideological shopping, I'd say he's become foundherent with the syncretism that we currently reside. I don't think his ML videos fully hit the mark, some still believe in it like the Finnish Bolshevik, I'm not. Can only wish the anarchist well as he goes his merry way with my own liberal to Ancom
Really, it's all a journey, ain't it? I'm not like I have anything else to lose in these unauthorized.
Guess this is the alternative to the copyright, which require virality of exposure and advertisers within a computational prospecting for attention economy these days.
Tbh, Welfare > UBI, it's still too much of a libertarian idea even if it's tried in Ireland.
So this is the idea of the right to the city, well, that's the policy of decommodification along with the state-craft to be taken, do recommend following this chap.
These are all policy changes though, radical systemic changes that sow the seeds to the creeping, changing urbanism or our society that are meant for the community action. Be it for the quiet revolts that happen underneath this domain.
So with these contradictions that will form, they will happen, the foundherent resolving as these hierarchal, horizontal alignment of distribution. Wonder what Finnish Bolshevik is doing? Oh, Talking about dialectal materialism theory and atheism.
I wonder if I'll keep following, haven't gone through his body of work fully.
The amazing atheist happened to drop a video, and he was an opportunist, I decided to check out that video in the bibliography, it was edgy calling Sargon a pick me grifter. Honest with Thunderfoot and his Anita whining. Welp, Thank you for trying to do a cogent video.
Only I respected Daniel Dennet.
What's happening on 1dime? I watched this long-form essay, everbody is splitting off again.Ah, Marxism, it may have disinformation or not. Thanks anway 1dime, you may be called a liberal, yet I know doing edutainment for the masses could be a thing, even if some argue it's a stepping stone.
Now, here's the question, am I Marxist? I'm an entertainer first, not a fighter. Yet I know conflict theory has influenced many an action flick and provided tension, that's with Aristotle theory of the unity of opposites is.
Foundherent will be within the label though of what I do, into socialism.
So yeah, dialectical materialism only a means of anaylsis.
