Learning the Beep boopitys in academic circles

Beep Boop = Ai For any savvy reader out there, when I talk about it, within my microbloggers, I'm talking about it. I've to keep it low in case random aggro doomers come and nibble at

Since, its become a standstill of recursive doomerist. Ignore the news-headliners of ai being Jailbroken and come with me with my sources on knowing the beepity boopits.

I've mentioned The Last Invention, yet what about Machine Learning street talk?

Lump of cognition fallacy with the latest one here though, even though I enjoyed the definition of intelligence with less is more (Which is supposed to be a paradox btw.)

There, articulating theory's that better there, even the sceptics I felt like I learned something with intelligence being defined right now. Come and seek the new answers with a niche audience of about a bunch of llm/diffusion and creativity that ain't reflective within the bubble of social media.

Because it's ultimately, and most fundamentally inconsequential, those who beg for propriety drm and infinity of copyright trolls.

Guess I'm stuck in the middle again.

Mechanical optimism Dario Amodei, along with Doomerism examined

  Dario Amodei seems to be sick of the doomers, I am too.

Guess with AI visions, I'll leave with a positive note. Machines o
f loving grace

That's the positive aspects of ai. Biological pathogens being sorted along with the ways of lays being rigorously analysed, not seen and a foundation within discourse, only to test theories.

Really gives me hope, even though it's coming through anthropomorphic, well, I can converse now with capital. Big does not necessarily mean bad if it's governed well. We all can't be noble savages.

Greater wrong has written by Doomerism and it's shades, time for emoooooo.

I'm a little ennui frankly, myself. Yet these layers of the onions are the self-described doomers.

Yet the idea of robot overlords getting bored as I skimmed through my the mathematics as entertainment made me interested, yet that tells something more about me than. It's by @jdp.extropian.net What about this, and Intermingling with the LLM engineers now because why not, This is what happens when a journalist does takes and even citizen journalisms.

Can't broad brush all believers at this rate.

Enjoy those links in the doomer examinations, because I'm not clicking em, to confess.

Oh, Fresh Episode of The last invention is here. I'll be putting these under the Beep_boop to show how much editorials I've done on AI. Clambering for certainty with opinions to how to find peace of mind.

I mean, bonus lecture at the risks and assessments of the risks, even the one I've done with psychosis one.

My foundherent philosophy beliefs

My entertainment persona, is only part of being a memoirist. Mesmerism ain't in my cards, Under the veil of fiction there's a man, inspired by Andy Masley.

Consider using this to start my foundherent belief manifest. Part of my memoir series. It's not a fixed epistemology and coined by Susan Haack. Will begin with this framework.

I don't have the expectation of somebody clicking my links, I'm doing it so I can check it out. Along with others.

Complete certainty, Founderhent Belief.

Things I'm going to carry till the end of my lifespan.

• Naturalism exists, (introductory article here.) Since the doctrine means that sciences of physical to the sociological do matter. Contingent and downwards of our rational facilities dependent.
• Moral Desert does not exist, or, Polemics ain't serviceable to an entertainer by definition. Rehab and deterrence prefably as a performer. Not because it's for a living, because the magician loves to conceal and hold attention.
• Personal identity reductionism or the Buddhist (anatta) is reductionist. Radical, or the identity we make, it's constructivism to perform for informal groups. Or the more formal groups officially anointed by the state. The fictions of self we make are great entertainment, though.
  
  It's all into status roles and state within our linguistic make-up within our discoveries circles.
• Political egalitarianism, ideally, everybody rights are respected. Even with the critiques of the Marxist labour of value (the internet is a counter to that.) Well, I'm not a Marxist in the doctrinaire sense, more a sociologist.
• Due to my Epistemological foundherentism and no fixed fundamentalism, I rest within the distribution of laying along and correcting my beliefs as more convincing evidence comes along. All part of the dialectical within the sociological mesh we exist.

Pretty sure beliefs, mid certainty

• Anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron because it requires a state to enforce a monopoly or monopsony. Self-ownership is an absurd concept.
• Value Rationalism and Pluralism, both combined, help liven the discourse within academic circles to help coexist.
• Utilitarianism can lead to a race to the bottom and should be with the deontology governance best interests to moderate it.
• Atheism : Secularism Yet I respect internalism if their rituals do not interfere with the state. Pretty sure god does not presuppose my thoughts. Even with theological naturalism.
• Marxism Karl Marx underpinning of sociology never intended to be having his doctrine written in stone and leave a legacy. Regardless, due to it leading to autonomy such as the stonewall riots, I cannot thank him enough with the labour theory of value. So yeah, he contributed. The state should, within reason, stop the perverse incentives of reactionary capital.
  
  Since with my disagreements with Marx anyway, most Marxists have become Marxists Leninst Maoist, anarcho libertarians, Sociologists and Economists.
  

• Free will compatiblism is needed via the state to hold bad actors accountable for their misdeed, got that one from Daniel Dennet. Along with deontological structure to help organise society to help coexistence. One could say this is my politics.
• Marx was a naturalist with scientific determinism, so scientific realism model.
  Since science is our reality, academia should be able to help inform our public through mass communications to help our hierarchy of insight. Of our communication of plot the spectacle, academia and the main road.
• License witherism: The privatisation of property should be resisted, for whatever reason, people should not create an entire industry complex of reasons concerning Platonic natural law. There's a reason why rights are not natural. A handshake deal and a deal is a deal.
  
  Marx was inconsistant with this, So Aaron Swartz goal with the creative commons is to help the Petit Boug (Like me) able to structure entertainment with the productive forces. Enclosure of the commons should be resisted.
  
• The right to the city matters with holding from reactionary capitalism. Since, capitalism has provided us with plenty of benefits, including welfare. One should be acting autonomously, away from those who own the means of publishing and reactionary strains to decommodify. Mutual aid networks can interconnect and help wither away the needs.
• Animal cruelty witherism: The meat industry complex is cruel and it should be regulated. Despite my omnivore, a reduction of protein could lead to weight maintenance and a more deontological society.
• I'm a bit iffy on electoralism, rather expressing the right to a protest whenever needed.
  
• Mental/Status Functionalism : We, in a society from the profession and de-professionALISE are designed for status role play and seriousness. Everything from the input and out of our wishful intentions and from our workful labour expressed is a manner of interconnectivity that creates our own interactions.
  
  These are ingrained in our structures. From informal groups into a stat of our formations.
• Semiotic reductionism rather than a semanticist, not a Saphir Whorf Hypothesis I'd prefer to think visually rather than verbally, although I find great value within literature and the art of the verbal expression. Words do not change how we ontologically behave, all the symbols and the symbols.
  
  That being said, the cartoonist/scriptwriter can do well to know about narratology, patterns of narrative that can lead towards a structural understanding filling the semiotics with. There's only so much praxis that can be accomplished
  
  
• Experience machine would be a bad time, Brain stimulation reward is a race to the bottom. (Here's the thought experiment)
• I understand the tension of deontology/dialectical materialism, so I may add the capability approach to making Marx compatible, John Rawls had an approach too, ain't touching that. Can't read all literature.
• (Experiment here)P-Zombies aren't real due to the Gradualism of the mind. So it becomes a natural phonoma
• Moral Realist, Experimental ethics yet with model science can't answer everything, non realism can be entertained though. Still up.
• Structuration of aesthetic value: While subjective outsider art exists. Welfare is meant to help the mid-class with the enhancement of the productive forces. All part of pluralism.
• Gettier justifications being fully complete: That's where true justified complete belief comes in.

Stuff I don't have the foggiest, difficult

• Mathematical realism and non realism : Sure, evidentialism could suggest a discovery of counting, yet such a thing is up in the air.
  
• Qualia: Fascinating area of study, haven't specialised in the theory of mind that much, leave that to psychologists.
• Time Theory. B and A theory. Seems fun! Still a hole in my foundherentist framework.

Boom, that's a life.

This is post is CC BY-ND

A recursive look at links

 Something in direct ways that matter.

Does it all matter?

I don't measure them! What about the numbers? The links on the right? The way I keep talking, the manner and such.

You may be looking at them right now? See that one at the aesthetically deep dives.

You may never click it, ain't that okay? 

Oh, 

Well, nobody clicks on your links when you do an essay or an incoherent essay. Don't be a twitter 'artist' elitist bunch of twerpy pretension.

So act in mass media, for the audience of one, okay?

Do you think they click on YOUR links? Nope! Nada, that's why I don't argue and have my epistemology on microbloggers.

strong vs nuanced opinion paytoilets

Everybody has one, everybody. Can take a dump despite the more academic, more rigorous approaches within this wild ways.

Pay toilet, was the vulgar expression by Harlan Ellison, used to express the spirit of western democracy.

Yes, everybody can do an essay  everybody can do porn, everybody can do a scat. It's what we signed up for. With content moderation being the thing, we govern each other.

So this self-governance is sacred, that's the thing with deontology and rights. Or as the autonomy of the previous days I was taught.

The discreet ones do it at the edges of acceptability. How these resolve of the provocateurs and polemists with the coexistence.

The strong ones draw lines in the sand, in the plane of axiology.

novelty =/= originality

People can be original, and still be insufferable.

Newness and the one an only uniqueness are not the same, Given the progression of time for each. One Direct response (extend) and the cognition (brand).

Newiness, we know the news can be ignored if it ain't emergency room stuff.

The others have gone through the gauntlet of conflicting symbolism, through pundit or cute to the blips of hosts/platforms. Well, professionals that don't attend.

If that the thing is one is first and lucky, then that ain't good enough. The law of diminishing returns takes it toll.

Propaganda is education/from our attention merchants of sex.

 Wow, Formalised instruction one keeps personal, yet unless it's entertainment under the legalese of fiction, there's a more direct approach.

Welp, Since essays are propaganda much like school, here's one on education within the west.

Sex workers (Prostitution) as I agree with most of what this video is on about. Thanks for the public service, and even if the opinions don't align, I know I can endorse the views like this.

Is this what they mean by world W***** three with what Chuck Palunuik wrote with pornagraphers? Like me being on the lower run of the whorearchy with its on social dynamics at play of all the way people seem to not pay attention to this blog, consumer my porn then go about their business? With that legeles of no politics, wanting only entertainment?

Is that it?

Well, rhetorically of course, there's the way I have to address sexcess of those who are discreet about what they enjoy, with their kinks that I have to address, it's like this wild west that I'm going to live in will have to see how others are paying attention.

It's like those kink accounts that post only porn to a marketing efficiency standpoint, yet I'm not optimised, I can't fit in a mold, being an intellectual with many foundherent believes ain't out of his Cascoon yet of discovering that I'm a freak who like with my Marxism.

Oh well, you follow doctrines, your article, and you're done.

W*****-Archy

Sexcess

Sexcess, that people only value me for my sexual performance. (If you ab-test a website enough, it will turn into a porn site.)

There, uncensored the word porn now, I'm done.

I'll keep track of Intellectexual, she may have some ignorant assumptions regarding with how deep I am in the beep boops, yet it will all pass.

essaykin, Our interal yearning for heuristics

No, I won't elaborate on this book reading meme. From Sharonk. Haven't got it.

With our linguistics, Noam Chomsky did his best to acknowledge an internal organising of our labour mechanisms. Patterns into simple and complex ones.

As a general rule, direct response is action. It pierces the consciousness with its heading.

To the tiniest of snippets of knowledge, to the biggest, all within a maxim of wisdom, to the incursion and the curious that's the whole shtick.

Mini snippets! Mini insight

Bowser Detourment Guy Deboard

Bowser, your name sells millions of copies, and the world sees you as their kingpin, irreplaceable!

What will you do, feeling the ways with your infinity of pin-ups, and p*** filling the way with exhibitionism. The pleasure is painful, the priapic and tension of the receptors can't take it.

The way that tingle makes the brains sour, urgh. Headaches and nausea from the tingles, the can't feel it. Absolute Anhedonic.

Anhedonic, that's stuffed full of advertising for entertaining an audience with the same old demanded spectacle.

You are the laughing on trick pony that's keeps going round. You've made it quantitively that brings the all down.

Come Guy Deboard, show me this villain needs another dousing of praise, one that will last to the end of time.

On a discarded lunch box flotsam, on the Blackpool beach. Then, only with cultural hegemony, such is will be. The herd morality persists within it.

Fair Use advocates

Interpretability the first one next-

Since copyright is a state sanctioned monopoly. Non-binding and unenforced. Freelance contract workers and the useful fiction of firms. It's not a platonic natural law.

Fair use advocates are appearing out of the seams. I can only sympathise due to the misinformation of micro bloggers.

The technical term is infringement, not plagiarism, and it ain't a felony. More an embarrassment.

Propriety drm won't solve this. This lawyer questioned the nofakes act, I agree. Thankfully it's not in effect.

"Why you should be worried about the NO FAKES Act:

-Threatens free expression and fair use

-Expands copyright law with broad language and vague definitions

-Harms open-source AI and tech innovation

-Would impact transformative works like fan and remix culture"

https://ccianet.org/articles/the-real-costs-of-the-no-fakes-act/

Welp, wish it the best. The lawyer is getting annoyed with the concept of 'market dilation' I'd say due to long tail there'd be diffuse, and I'm looking into automation from other sources other than the old doctrine of dialectical materialism.

Cartesian Graph questions

 

What if none of this makes any sense?

No control to this in regard to winning any social media lottery.

Reading Liberal theory and all ideological presumptions fixated with brute and simple by design.

Politics is a lot more complicated than a Cartesian graph, there's a Marxist/economics refutation, there's the anarchist refutation, then there's those who do it bully centrists.

Which, what are you going to do?

Then it's used for branding exercise, position, Other than the lottery of the social media.

Such a manner of label and self-actualization, self-determination. Here we have where through the cross, This is where the views of our democracy of many lies.

Creative service

Creative service Gabe? Well, I have my thoughts.

Venn diagram of industrial and artisanal modes of production! Marxist doctrine, a go-go.

Industry its stuff of labour and professionalism, and the firms. Right to the artisanal.

Marx, Keysein and the Marginal Austrian one with theory of economic value, scarcity to make a product.

Artist implies creativity of an individual, not a collective (Even if they have style guides and a place and trace.) Thats the industry of arc! Taylorism and Fordism combined to make it with scientific management.

So, The mode of production is required to ascend from hackneyed to creative. Select the factory, select the future.

Industrial hacksmenship, or marginal cost and value vis the artisnship of labour value. (That's the doctrine of Marxism for ya)

Graphic design and Illustrator, industrial, Contemporary art not so much.

There it is again, Commercial and Literary distinction again.

The anti-bootleg eyes of castella

 

If anybody DARES conceive out her propereity domain,

Then she ZAPs them, like the emperor who has such a high status, the subject dies when looking at them.

Her likness in you mind? ZAP.

Her Face? Zooop.
Even the word Cast? Zappers.

Burnt to a crisp, merely like that, a nothingness of not being able to conceive  as she owns the word the and 99% of writers have perished based on here benevolent rule!

You can only pull from thin air, and all ethers as all ideation is contingent to her!

Observe. An idealism within her natural law! Of Golden abundance!

PWOOOOOOOOOSH!

The concepts that don't make it

Unable to reach the finish line of scribeomania, reaching the end.

With the state-sanctioned monopoly looking over, will you ever get the distribution you wanted, the fame you deserve?

Well, not all, all things in the publishing industry that does not pay attention, it is industry, marginal return and so forth.

To the end of all characters of conduct and into the one selector.

From the slush pile, of mediocrity and to the rat race comes what is called.

THE CREATIVE INDUSTRY

speed format conclusions

Badmouse said that streamers earning fame ( or infamy symbolic relatable capital ) and money hinders the overall struggle.

I say, yeah as an activist, no as an entertainer. Yet, do these editorials say otherwise, ho ho ho, well, you do encourage me Harlen.

Staying in sync is the most important of all these.

Since streaming is the best take to be able to manage ones one personal space, there's no editing, one clear distinction between editing (non-sync) and unediting (sync).

Leaving a trail, editing along the genealogy of ideas to pluck out moments of consciousness. That is one sense, to bring verisimilitude with the work.

Peter Coffin on licensing, character examination

So I'm going to dive into a excommunicated character. Time to commentary time with my impressions.

Yes, I'm posting this. IDC if you disagree, and you see this as an endorsement. Cussy things asides with all the amounts. Here's he goes with the labour theory of value. 

As with gatekeeping, well, better to gatekeep creative commons rather than copyright doctrinaire. Each vote of that only legitimises the system. (That's an anarchist saying)

I've had to my commentary with Hbomberguy and Innuendo, We may have had differences with the movie such as c*ties with me agreeing with feminists Podcast episode, that's here and there.

Oh and the content, I've simmered on that. It's capitalisms perverse incentives and race to the bottom, really. Any sociological, foundherent analysis yet nobody is calling the obvious thing out to Hbomberguy.

Wow, he's got excommunicated by the copyright doctrinaires! Woopsy. Going to abstain my judgement of the J. K. Rowling thing. Guess he's right to call out the harassment campaign of the liberal apologists of certain issues now left-coded.

(Even when then, Innuendo's This is Phil Fish video has passed in the past. He's doing presentations of thought terminating clichés now. Strongly Agree.)

Commentary channels with this Though over the word content means there's still some hope, along with left unity never being a thing since it's harder to accomplish, that's a good thing. Welp, with my own opinion of the content/format distinction being a non-sequitur.

It's gone south, though, along with Stephanie.

What happens with those full of social media capital of Symbolism and relatability do now? Get Sad and leave, or mad and try to consolidate and control. Have to agree with that.
Yeah, Opinion has lowered.

Oh yeah, I've discovered his position on Ukraine for the moment, and I support their right to self-determination. Frantz Fanon Self-determination. 

Agreements

Gen AI and propriety copyright

Fanboyish elitism

Understanding Sociology/neoliberal, and consumerism is not worker.

Prosumerism

The term content is a mindless pop contest
Malthusian Documentary one is strong.
Content Elitism (I get that, the socialisation of our production and our product privatisation. There a sliver of truth there amongst its commercial/prosumer uses.)

Disagree

Certain geopolitical issues. (Maybe here and there though, Idk Already here and there.)

My emptiness that he may of not read Susan Hacks Foundherentism.

Gatekeeping, I'm suspecting more of moral panic and status role. Pearl cluting.

If I gave a completely arbitrary game review score 7/10 for this self publisher. I may even seek out his book.

Was in my research folder, is this the group he mentioned?

No politics = legelese recursive product of Governance

I'll steel man this then give a balanced take. On such a unbinding, unenforced legalese. Non state sanctioned.

In the void of the internet, there is no duty, no service, the long tail of distribution. From the pundit pot stirrers, to the Kardashians trying to look their concept of cute. Yet, social media is sold to the advertisers or the society of subscriptions. Vendors, serviceability.

It shows that this could be an entertainer, not a lecturer of governance, education, journalism, religion . Focusing on televisual rather than typographic expression; showmanship.

Since fiction is the legalese used for state protection for specific expression, not natural law.

This may suspend proselytisation and ideological presumptions of the viewer. All being part of a campaign.

So no controversy, politics imply two states at tension'n conflict. Along with fictional drama being within the subject. That's a charitable view. Keeping one's head down from the pot-stirring provocateur.

However, it's like a butler saying "It's not my job to have an opinion" it does bring questions, since it is not natural law anyhow.

I cannot tell the intentions of such an entertainment-ese layer. Since Interpretation and scrutiny of the media is used to help provide meaning. All the ideological presumptions will be guessed and speculated on, along with whether it being direct like satire or propaganda.

Whatever we reach and whatever we think. (Such as the clock metaphor, clock is the measurements of matter, the sociology of goals to tell the time.)

Right reasons, wrong reasons, undefined! Wow. Interpretation can matter.

I think of this writer snippet alot.

Things I agree/disagree of Stephanie: Moving on.

Interest wanes and falls

Because i'm not a gamer! ohh, maybe i'll snoop in your podcast and five years. I'm a freelance contract worker who happens to do

I agree with him with licensing here along up until AI which I'm not sure he's clarified about. I'm sure he's mislead. Legitmate fears, well, enjoy a lot of dildos and adult themes in this.
(Dildo references), Lot's of sex toys

I can't find myself enjoying 95% cases of licence. Wish it was consistent.

Replace EA with 'Disney' and replace customers with Independent artists. Class analysis and dialectical materialism.

Despite my disagreements, I did enjoy his video on Bogwarts. All of them. Well, Even Peter Coffin has words on that.

It goes south with her reaction to the AI thought, Peter Coffin, Alexander Avile, Sunny'm Cheax, Andy Masley have responded better.

Now I'll see if I can make with Peter Coffin, being the citizen investigator I will have to see his own way with the ai. Oh She's wrong on NFTS too. So, I must do my bid adieu as a customer and not follow.

Getting too moral panicky.

Gotcha Tribunals

 Thinking about Statecraft, Governance, and yes, Politics. Evaluating what Set thought.

Seth has written about it. Guess he's a liberal.

Tribalism, other than the colonial implications. Has its own sparring of power.

Or what they say about informal groups. Status and governance. 

Why is everybody thinking everything a trial to declare verdict on microbloggers?

Everything a villain? Everything a verdict. Complete in curiosity across with the microblogging mind, the amount of discourse is the take it in an amount, time to vary the way.

I'm seeing the reliance of willing misinformed opinions within the west. Relying on Ayn Rand, and now there are more pundits than every trying to out-do each other. Guess this is why we still have the academics.

As a general rule, don't bother if it takes a bibliography, since you got to stay in sync with oneself.

An Examination of L0ddism

 They did not have the insight. It does not deal with our desire for modernism. People cannot wrestle with the idea that there are times when, even with the crisis theory provided my Marx, they're still our tools and still another day.

I'll have to get out of this baby leftist mindset and see that how others cannot get their education from streamers and microbloggers. I can't learn from a Laggard, they can't be reached. So to stay in sync with myself.

First volume of capital I've tried to read. Try and get a correct interpretation, yet with this postmodern quote-mining wave of hyperreality. I'll go with this one.

Some retweets.

 ‪@segyges.bsky.social‬ from this thread

"the artisans are behaving like politically destructive rent-seekers and trying to reduce automation instead of seeking meaningful political change concerning ownership of capital and allocation of resources" is also orthodox marxist

the entire idea of fixed capital is that workers individually do not necessarily own the means of production; like, whether or not they morally should own their output, they do not, that is not how the thing works, and the social arrangement for large factories makes it complex to even try to do

-

i do think however that marx is correct on the basic points of

1) automation is good

2) luddism is bad

3) the problem is who controls the automation, and the wealth created by it, and who gets left out

4) the solution ultimately has to be the power of the state"

‪@bitesu.kawaii.social‬
"the luddites were not pro workers rights they were not a labor movement they were artisans and workshop owners and guild members who were financially threatened by industry because factories could produce textiles far cheaper than their poorly paid apprentices stop with this ahistorical nonsense

they were reactionaries who were opposed to progress because their own private enterprises were outcompeted by a new mode of production. "pro workers rights" like they weren't all guild artisans who had their own sweatshops where apprentices did all of the work
please read some actual theory and actual history for gods sakes or you're going to fall back into the trap of carrying water for petit bourgeois reactionaries impeding progress. not a single marxist with two brain cells to rub together is going to say "we have to go back before capitalism " cause that's the whole point!! new modes of production and new modes of social organization pave the way forward to newer yet modes of production and organization, some of which can even facilitate socialism (like industrial modes of organization. for example)"

(Oh and Ned Ludd ain't real, Brian Merchant is doing revisionist history.)

So Industrial mode of production =/= Artisinal Mode of production. That's the matter of the modernisation that we will do, moving forward. Reading with literature and the textbook

So the answer is.

NAY 👎🛋! Reject this Petit bougiese impulse and show sympathy to the industrial/working class who can't afford the artisanal modes of production

Along with the pull of plopyright shifts us to atomised alienation, resist the pulse! Gift economies, Pro bono, Creative commons licensing as alternatives.

Support Ghostwork and Turkpoticon and ignore the clown dogmatism at microbloggers.

They're basically going to go nowhere, like selfish Ayn Ryandists, and Male supremacist movement that happened within 2016 and then disappeared into obscurity. Ron Paul Supporters too! - It all comes around.

I don't even identify as a Marxist doctrinaire given how diverse my thought is with sociology'n all economical analytic thought, the way the west with it's movement are silly.

I will read more literature and textbooks on automation, yet we must shift our automation to replacement to reassembling, revolting along with the anti-trust of monopoly.

I Shall end with a quote from the Lorax

The Lorax

"What do you want? Shut down the factories? Make the workers lose all their jobs?"
"You have your point, Yet I don't know the answer" ~ Dr Suess, Despite my many disagreements with him. What an interesting paradox of handling our growth of our society, hmm?

Media capital vs Tech capital

Oh boy it's couch Gregor talking about capital again

Looks like

Couch Gregor is in his sociological mindset still!

Media
Social capital, Symbolic capital. and Relatability, based on status, from Pierre Bourdieu's observation.

Tech
Modes of production capital, agricultural, from the industrial, too artisanal, to the executive/directional

Did you know Economics are a way to say Marxism? It came from sociology.

So Commodified it vaporises thought

Be careful what media input you take.

Mass commodified content designed for kiddies evaporates from my brain from how easy consumable it is, guess the big-wigs knew, doing some thinking. I can't remember a Mr Beast video.

Well, it's not for me. Kids do love it, Not going to Junophobia it though, this is a thing with social media though, everybody comes and run it down to the ground, from everypart.

Guess FlazzFire has gone the edutainment route and deciding on to be a comedian, taking the vulgarism with it and writing like Chuck Palunuik. 

My fave part of this collage.

I'll keep following him. Cussy as it is, not as Academically rigorous. Welp, that's the problem with the plot/spectacle of Aristotle.

Fuzzy mirage of mental models/literacy/illiteracy

Happy Halloween! Here's a off-the-cuff essay by a philosophy student wanting literacy.

Yet I know I'll have to deal with mass communicating towards an illiterate audience outside.

What convinced me was Neil postman. Even with my Art Director brain that I have to learn at literacy, I haven't had to chance to read all the socialism books so that's why some of my feed are videos, so even if I'm not literate, I'm aware of the changing concepts closely rela

Otherwise, you get Vaush, missed that train, or Ed Zitron.

I call this new strain the prosumer leftism, which is absorbed within itself of its own social media bubble. Or wilfully misinformed leftism.

Yet with the right/left graph and the political compass, I'm going to have to do another post on that.

Time for Lanterns

 Start of walk today, then it ended in lanterns. No appetite for the potatoes as a brought back one with the swan.

It's the celebration of lanterns, making time out of zines with my manners, and it's all the family thing.

I do keep promises of keeping family first, all those streams I do are mearly sprinklings of an entertainment guy who decided to stream to get in tune with the project.