Gurney written about it, Seth Godins, written and podcasted about it and others within my circle are having their takes. With Patrick Willems.
Hopefully, this is going to be my own point of view. Nothing things from before.
The market, and the way the attention shifts, new trends and technological shifts are occurring.
Image generating search engines, and the need for an endless supply of content, whatever hackneyed to keep the show of going on.
I'll never use any of these images, myself reminded of the handcrafted pottery, and it's wabi-sabi imperfection, it can't be entered within a computer. The artwork and the process ain't there when I typed it up, it's average, middle of the road.
Romantic to the wabi-sabi crumbles back in my days.
I'll be alright, with my professional non-profit stuff, what's the problem is there's going to be others to understanding the grassroots process. Getting in those fingers raw.
I'll be alright, with my professional non-profit stuff, what's the problem is there's going to be others to understanding the grassroots process. Getting in those fingers raw.
It's here now, from chatbots to the like. What there will be in terms of work for free and professional work will change again. Jobs are going to be shuffled. Making sustainability solvency will mean difference once more.
Seeing copyright is going to be reinforced again by small businesses and commercial illustrators. It's a universal law where the copyright trolls will have a field day. Is this what creators should do? Build careers suing others? We don't want big wigs, from Disney, Warner Bros, and Sony making a DMCA AI detection system an over illustrators style, or a writer's voice.
Already, the seeds have been planted by adobe. The enemy of my enemy, ain't my buddy.
An AI detection system that will cut off Artist's living like that audio detection on twitch, youch.
From my the mutuals of my other account.
Not gonna bang on for amateurs for playing with the new tools. Neither am I going to fully publish any AI stuff without giving it the one and only edit, (then, it ain't artificial) It can only summon mass, the general mean. Mediocre. Something that a quirky couch cannot be replicated by.
Maybe it will interweave with new ideas, in the coming years. Only as a tool to get into the creative juices. Not the other way around. So there has to be an interweaving with it.
Copyright and trademark or one of the most double-edged laws, flexible and hard to be grasped, empowering it won't be good. Fair use will be tested. The content tug between if our ideas will be cannibalized or fair used will occur. Best to work through it, even as the amoral business models change.
Don't get any funny ideas on what they will do with this.
Don't get any funny ideas on what they will do with this.