Building broken ideologys

Oh, you, so idealistic.

Such a means that can utopian or that it's broken to a past mostly debated and fighting over imperial powers. You think your singular vote cotes for crud?

No, you are going to debate endless babies and their endless whining, no interest in preserving as their juvenile demands for the entertainment you think you owe them does not exist so.

Even if it's merely one, screaming and squawking like as if it cannot clean its own messes.

What messes does it lead.

The curse of a famous saint

Always undertake on the back end, always hugging the rearview

Not rhyming not reoccurring making something out of a desire, to serve till his bones grind to dust.

There has to be better than offering indulgence after the saintly event.

Something better.

Or, so it pretends. The sacred pretentions held less within today.

Patterns that bind us

If I had to nominate the worst doodle, this is it. Since I'm the editor though, I shall let it pass.

Yep, that's another problem, Edify for those who aren't ready to be leaded, for the those who are literate. To serve the sexual formalism of a system of the next entertainment mascot that merely happens to bring the next thing, structuration in the McDonald's iron cage.

Are they going to listen, or is the formula? The formulation pays when this nature of our hackneyed pigeonholing is done for a reason. From our taxonomies and typologies. Of our genre, to confirm to fit.

Almost like, something when commitment is applied.

The previous ____ book.

Kyro Cleans after Theo and finds a book.

A questionable book

A questionable writing

A questionable talking point

This and that lost media does it leave a stink of imperfection. Burned with the books of old. Along with the preservation of new.

Since when did that Tailism happen to leave such a mess of oddity? Such old historiography into the ways that threatens such a what others may deal a way of betrayal of class interests that he can't think I can read.

He can't think I can't read? 

The A.I Gulf, and auto-posting software : Postbirb/Buffer

When you do research to do a journalistic piece. You go around all the Internet to editorialise into an essay, these are all notes. Incoherently placed, here we go.

Since others use auto-posting software, I've dabbled within postybirb, and the more dubious online app buffer. I discovered Buffer advertises itself with link shortening, so I'll be direct. ( No point hiding it, I don't think boycotting/blacklisting will work either. ) Toothpaste is out of tube.

It's dubious since it has an auto-durative intelligence, that I haven't used. That if you want my word, since I want to be a professional writer, the portmanteau between illustrator and writer is a cartoonist. Not going to be using the 

( Postybirb does not do this, by the way. Even though, a spell checker is always appreciated for typos. )

No, I don't endorse it, yet my vote ain't going to count, ain't it? It's been integrated within 'Grok' within xwitter, and that I've been. There's still a rough folk congregation, a Venn diagram of the forming groups under various labels and political sympathies. I have some for the open source with my gift, as long as I own it. Well, It's the time for the commons and public domain have been useful services to our society. My characters coming from pride and prejudice.

(Sometimes I anthropomorphize my ideological conflicts as characters for my entertainment, Regardless. Do I even Fictionalise myself into a entertainer to absolve any responsibility? I'm certainly against the maximisers and what Chuck Wendig has done.)
To sketch out the labels some further, This is what called positioning:

Ai Futurists - Open sourcers ()  Copyright Maximisers - Ai Haters
Lets show this concept some more.

Some people use sneer/scare quotes within open source.

Fair use is always going to be murky water. You don't own concepts, poses, or colour schemes.

The grifters are the tasteless Elsa gate churners targeting illiterate kids to game with the essentialising of money for their product. Perfectly designed, unlike the imperfection wabi-sabi of art.

Despite Seth Godins endorsements of tech, I'm a technologist when it comes to aiding within the creative labour industry and freelance sectors. It's still decimating as we speak. I'll keep track of him. His take on AI going through a Gartner hype-cycle is another thing. It's something I resonate with, since once again, This genie has been out of the bottle.

With indie publishing, even when small businesses themselves can be as bad as their commercial counterparts. Then with Stephanie Sterling and above with the many disputes of Fair use being a muddy term of creation.

The water-usage is overblown, I've donated directly to Ecosia, which I recommend switching your search engine too. Heard it's less than boiling a kettle, I've rebalanced by carbon with a donation that I'm planing to give or my own writing of fiction.

Filippo Valsorda

‪@filippo.abyssdomain.expert‬

There must be something about wasting water that really clicks with people, maybe because they can visualize it? It's kind of farcical, the WaPo story about this tried to make it sound like a lot of water and in the process admitted it's... not?

‪Filippo Valsorda‬ ‪@filippo.abyssdomain.expert‬

·

6mo

Holy f**k I missed that: TRAINING ALL OF GPT-3 consumes in total as much water as... producing beef for two people for a year. Not pro-rated to the usage of GPT-3 two people make in a year. Total. And we get a whole article about the water consumption of AI?! bsky.app/profile/ryan...

December 17, 2024 at 2:27 AM

1 repost

9 likes

Since the growing of the usage of AI, I've been following the blogging of various writers who's describing their thoughts. So I'll have to keep track of this. Oh, I will vote for the shadow libraries because it's a means to spread the idea. I shall defend to the death for a creative to sales rep for free and paid. The economy of gifting and hobby does not exist.

I'll resolve this with a video by Shaquille on this. 21 min for those who have missed it.

They'll certainly be a market for hand-made craft, with more and more of this silly technology play-do'd search matter will create more blacklist. I speculate that it's still going to resurface with new iterations. This regurgitation is tasteless. This lack of direct action from others is also tasteless.

I do believe good artists should get paid for the labour and activism, yet this will move towards my leanings, given with my own accord. Copyright maximalism ain't the answer. It's not like these untouchable technopolys deserve any PR anyway, including Nintendo.

(Oh, and the reason I keep using bug is a two-way posting. Reduce cognitive load.)

Do contact me though, I don't

Typological awakening, out of mimes

It still surprises me today that people don't own and label it, words mean things, and they lead into our taxonomies that are countable and then into a dialectic to our countable.

Abstraction and self-referential reexamination can matter deliberately. As Plato pointed up with the paradox of our enlightenment with his cave.

Instruction prose and poetry without the form. Has managed to hyper-focus the writing facilities to a point that's made. Out of the monkey see monkey do, from quick social media.

It's stopped to make me think like a mime. Out of such a biological taxonomy of carnality, an ideal, and principle helps to pull out a long promise. Away from the race to the bottom.

Good design does not necessitate instruction, prose or poetry, yet it does not entail it. Especially when delivered.

"Learn to be a hack"

Such is seeing SEO reflected at me, I cannot change much as the system of those who don't read. That's what those high for.

Specification work, or hack work. Stuff by formula, then Dynasour. 

"Those high follower count nsfw artists, Learn to be a hack, it will save your life!"

"The Thing about being a hack, it does not invalidate you for art."

I think of what Dynosaur said, since others don't view their entertainment as a moral act. With the amount of essentialising into the mise en place, and then eliminating any distractions that follow through.

Excuse to hustle, or..?

Such is when is defeatism, or the act itself an admission to the self, to serve others a most layered gift. Is it so to see the inverse? Distinction, on the axis between confusion and clarity, become fuzzy.

The alternative?

Make it a choice.

What matters, that a career or aspiration comes with the typology and then tropes.

Condemnation, and invalidation, is not necessary if the intent is made clear.

Couch Gregor'd

Assuming Direct Control: Ideoeros

With the love of fiction comes with the love of the intangible ideas. (Reading Susan Haack, Despite her critic of dialectical materialism, she's got a solid epistemological study through such academese. Academes does not translate well into social media. What it means to consciousness raise to a public audience.)

Direct control is relative to the ideological justification provided, such is the authority, authorising new cultivations. 

With no election, contest or anointment, performances lead before. It's best to be direct, to simplify. At first, for the intuitions of the public, started with publishing.

Such is our fragments made from the once deferentialism, now it's with the cynics out there who happen to respond. Out of the platforms with our ideas that our for the culture, not some kind of algorithm that seeks to do.

A way of viewing of what can be seen an erotic nature of property.

Paids likes volume Advertising; Electorlism

Completely abstract expressionist. Aren't we?

‪As I evolve and adapt my praxis, it comes to mind that advertising, money and its influence remains forever predominant. That's not fatalistic, that's simply acknowledging what advertisers want.

Whats data for? Since advertising takes from the book of electorlism. So to quote.

Glenn White‬‪@justicar.xyz‬

"Here's a thing: People who analyse social media look at volume of dialogue on a topic to help understand the relative importance of a given thing or event. If you talk about a thing on social media, even to make fun, you are amplifying it's importance, which impacts more than you know.
You want to see less of a thing, don't say anything at all about it. Block it. Ignore it. Mute the words.
"But Bluesky doesn't work off algorithms!" But paid media off Bluesky does. So do investment analysis firms. Advertising campaigns. Market analysis for local big box stores. "This is what people on Bluesky are talking about." "Well, then it must be important!"

South Bay working marketing teaches Media literacy again. Emphasis on paid media. This is what editorial should know with mass audiences amd there cultivations.

Men in black quote.

 ~Couch Gregor

Priotisation/Optimisation

There's etymologising, 3d optimisation use within three modelling and commercial optimising.

 SEO or the other way around. One of the factors to consider within decision-making with putting resources and attention into in regard to the concept of importance.

The means to distinguish, or to calculate. What is an axiology, what scales within power scaling within each mind. To be squashed into a huge box of mechanised content, them moves into a new section.

Efficiency and simplicity are not necessary a means of making things better for those who the artist intends to serve, even if it matters. Death of the author or Intentional design.

This afternoon when those who values mechanical simplest he when they see everything as a nail they become the Hammer. One who hasn't conceptualised towards the importance of what can only see the quickest things.

Only a matter of the hacks that can't read, that's a problem with the NSFW genre in general. If every lane looks the same with no discernment of action, then it all funnels into the word of 'content'.

When there's no distinguishing of alternative, where do you go?

Well, act accordingly. Is the priority within our idealogy for a long term benefit, or the short term benefit of the sexploitative public road? Material reductionism is still vulgar.

Hills to die on

Abstract expressionis

Make a principal standard for those who make excuses. Not in a editorial way. Prudish and promiscuous left withstanding.

Not countable by any metric. It's hijacking, all that amount made with the way that's requires new hills.

Such are held within the mind though, that's the problem with such vulgar reductionism that happens with such as the Techno-cruncher, and then the crumbly, down to no solid point.

Well then, there's going to have to be a better hill to die on, not today. There's a prosumer demographic of gamers. Drawing lines in the sand is what makes our points of view.

(Racism discussion ahead) 

Theodor Adorno's concepts are standardisation will have to move into new concepts. Welp, seek and create the new, Nobody's perfect, as this essay of Adorno Demonstrates. Critical theory adapts.

I won't take no for an answer

Hopkin gives a speech to a golem in the corner.


 "What do you expect from hypostatized sex appeal? A medal? Self-express? Self express, self in with the wants of a swallowing plush!

I'm the cute cat you're the fluff brain!

Why could people appreciate good service for their own desires even if it may be a short-term little spasm and what they call their excitement centres. For all serves a long-term desired fun of magnificence. Heroism of simple service and the flattery shall combine into one point of streamed excellence.

Make them writhe and fantize in their pillows as they phantasms in their visions scream for more plush! Till it crawls out of the vessels and eyes. Don't stop make them envision till the whole cult and authorities scream at you to shut the F___ up!"

He uses his cane to push the golem back up to it's feet, adressing it's dancing gear with an inspection of friday night. Its my job to see if it works.

"Give em' something to play."

Beach Visit

The pier, sketch in the car, and the burger meal with garlic mayo

Self portrait in the sand.

Dealing with an over-caffeinated cup within a yellow Addius jumper. Following a message online with wanting to practice Impromptu.

It was a quick 2-hour visit, a world with such a visit that was filled the breath from the work schedule of comicing that's made with a family.  It's all that essentialism towards a material that made me want to leave it. Came with a empty candy floss bag and a reason why I'm not a regular at restaurants.

Burger was worth it though, no tummy bugs other than that hurl from not having limits within my coffee limit, It's a choir though. Why haven't I got to the time with playing with amusements? Is it my lack of response and measured attempts to fulfil an aspiration to something?

It's an attempt, I tell my Brother about Bluesky, he hasn't even heard of it, the internet moves so fast that even my family. He don't know about the microblogging and the attention spans there, it's a world that's going faster beyond my control. The cheesy attempt of determinism.

Yet this is the pace that I choose right now, and I own.

( I bet he does not know of the rule 34us industry complex within adult entertainment, oh well, domain knowledge's will never match up completely with our public languages.)

I can't entertain elitism about being online so much.

@motfal.bsky.social

Have scrumbly! Stream commission.

How am I responsible for a micro-entertainment persona.

~Couch Gregor

Esoteric/Exoteric

Other than the luck

Outside in inside out.

Such as the way of the esoteric discussions must be made into the communications of the outside world to an exoteric domain.

For familism to novelism, to the other way around. Even with the Egyptian specifications, who remade their crafts toward the avant gardes. Out of sociological reasons, there it is again, we are going round to a status play. To our governance.

I keep moving through this conceptual distinction, from that to the last. Discovered and made into better specifications, or not scaled for intentional craft.

-------- new family girlfriend

15 portrait.


My brother has a Congo line of romantic relationships. This girlfriend admits her age and chuckles for a moment, inebriated as they move towards with chuckles with my own single solitude with a computer.

This one is friendly, with a secret handshake and a promise to goto KFC. On Saturday, It did not follow through as a washed-up gesture. I arranged for it to be ordered. Had to focus on my craft'n all.

The only time I liked the time where it was Monday morning, with my family getting the sizzler stacker in a compressed moment. That was serviceable and quick, the convenience taken for granted.

Now a supermarket air fryer chicken along with a heated wrap could do the trick, for another day of hack work making rounds to an empty reaches of what may be called 'an audience'.

What works with love, as I can hope this diet. Through metaphor and reality, is sensible now.

Autonomous art

Theodore Adorno, the indirect confrontation. I'll adore.

No point writing to hustlers who don't read, or who can't label or own their slog. No purpose to feed data and not itself, where's the sincerity of it? The short term wants of the audience cannot be made, is there balance? Should there be one?

The claim that it can completely independent is itself a political statement, the avant-garde defence. These are apologetics with their own character.

It's all about for vendors who don't want to listen, or do a rote mechanism towards a reductionist idea of transaction. All to the idea of being irresponsible to job specification. If only they were only more direct with their hustle.

Well, that's what it takes, with such as confrontation, even interpretation.

Which is why the prosumer itself feels like the most condescending, degrading to the craft of art to hackneyed product. So the paradox comes to move upwards again. The prosumer has a memory of a goldfish.

Commited art

I cannot separate art from artist, as with commitments, everybody's got a pontification of it. I'll say it's certain vendors' neutrality.

Fiction ain't directly political. The truth holds in the indirection.

Essays, editorials are. With no artifice. Direct confrontations can overlap, not drive the theme within the fiction.

They are always there, those who pontificate avoiding dramatizing/controversy is itself an dramatisation. Accepting a cold defeatism of entertainment that could be the lay like that. Or, beyond the amusement, there's the artifice, along with action.

That is, what commitment ought to show. With no apology. To the audience with tension. To that insufficient bread and circus. The mysticism that self-contradicts.

I semi-agree with Bertolt Brecht about political illiterates, by the way, the only problem with that is that they deliberately don't read, which is counter to it all.

Contributions to the age of sceptics

 The collective consciousness has spoken. Everbody's jaded. So it's our time to see if it's time to move from the copywriting, from action towards age of belief.

•  Politicians
•  Grifters and scammers
•  Spammers/Trolls
•  Slop/< Only applies to literary types
•  People who don't read
•  People who don't choose to read
•  Certain authority positions in general
•  Technocrats
•  Hardcore Gamers
•  Tantrum-throwers
•  Industry complex apologetics
•  Imposters not being pretentious
•  Tantrums
•  Hustle culture
•  Toxic Positivity/Dogma
•  Anesthetization
•  Vulgarisation

Hermit editorial

Being a novelist is what I do. Against the status quo, wow, what a challenge.

I was the anti-social kid for being obsessed, compelled with specifications of drawing. It's all not serviceable to the meaning of the Internet, only wanting status and affiliation. What a world of wild-west randomness that I cannot determine.

This is the prices and input/output with social interaction being coded and calculated amongst and stream of ones and zeros, towards a distribution tract where others squabble to.

Being on the moon can help, yet the payment itself is legible. Always a positive'n negative with such a means to express oneself journalistically like this.

Editorial stuff like this ain't necessarily contradictory. It's happening once the noise of the fictional entertainment/amusement dries up. Solitude allows the irrationality and conflicts to be played out, safely.

All my characters are split from my ideological conflict so that it can leave into an ending, between the primordial chaos and the orderly fixed catagorys.

( Also, Streamlining my rants, politics, and postmodernism into Editorial )

Nicey-nice Exocolonist objection

[CW: Discussion of politics, Nazism and Christian topics]

Such a term made to describe prosumerist trends online. "No pawlitics" with a rabid defence. If you do the language of entertainment, do it right.

Be it cultivation or hypodermic

Link to the exocolonist article by Doc Burford can be cussy, drives a point home though.

I can feel the neophiliacs tension with this quote, thats only in so far as the intended audience cares about the newness alomg with there vendors.

"Look, you can never consider yourself special or discerning for enjoying a product that employed a literal army of marketers in a skyscraper somewhere with the express goal of getting you, personally to spend money on the product. You’re a consumer. You bought the most marketed thing in the world. It’s like basing your personality on liking Coca Cola, the most popular soda on the planet. Congratulations on being the laziest mother______r alive, incapable of discovering anything for yourself because you’re an incurious f___.

Why would you ever demand respect for doing something easy? Why would you demand respect for liking something popular? It’s popular, which means a lot of people like it. By definition, you cannot be special for liking the big and popular thing!

But along comes the person who buys the game with the ads in Times Square and the commercials on the television and the standee in gamestop and the neverending press coverage (because it gets the clicks, and who’s doing the clicking? a lot of other people just like you!) and they go “I’m special! I’m special for consuming the commercial product!”

I wouldn’t consider you a discerning consumer for buying a McDonald’s McChicken sandwich every day, so why would I consider you a discerning consumer for buying the most commercial s___ in the world?

Congratulations on being boring.

Now, hey, this isn’t to say you can’t enjoy popular media! I enjoy a McChicken. The Last of Us 2 had a pretty good shotgun and some nice graphics! But to suggest that you are special for consumption? That’s what is ludicrous. It’s not even serious. It’s pathetic and boring."

He rants about wholesome next, along with escapist and ironic within entertainment, that's another thing with commercial fiction.

Such is our rule 34, clickbaitiness that's harmless since it is fictional entertainment, technically. (Well, the rule 34 kink scene never changes, it never does Wow, how they hack it away within their territorialism of slop. That's what the hackneyed defeat of it all of these platforms want, more data, more coursing and the end.

I can only relate to them with these other platforms, propriety strictness of the platform with a SEO that's hard to ignore.

It's still prosumers for the dysfunctional business models awaiting it's return. Act on the platforms accordingly. Aah, the annoying commercialism and it's paradoxs. thats another pondering. (Even the article asks for it, welcome for the machine.)

Agitprop, In MY smut?

The public want their polite fictions and bread from their saints!

What a desire to see what could be considered a polite fix, and I'd grandiosity of our livelihoods. That I see somebody rocking my boat?

It ain't called consistency for its own sake, or politeness in of itself, if it ain't my fundamental mission of promising a sacred space of relieve.

What do they say when they need catharsis when it comes knocking, making trivialities.

Mindless attraction, Mindless repulsion reduction. Gambling and the desire machine.

Tension 》 release/interpassivity which is the point of fictional entertainment in its brute reductionism, applied into dominion and monopoly over the social media.

I bet, with all the hackneyed work of what is deemed hackneyed now with circularity farmed for shareholder fixation, do we see it.

Desire machine that entertainment designs.

Essay of addiction by design, or compulsion.

1:09 hour

What a sensation, motor operations made unpersuasive, that's the hope for the effort.

Stepford Wives

Ira Levin has made a parody of making humans into robotic products succinct.

As with the creep of obedient worker robots obsessed with housework and obeying masculinity, welp, there's a feminine theming along with a dig towards how such a creep could be effecting others.

Chaos to Order here.

Chuck Palahniuks take with this creeping, status ( which shall be a neutral construct ), shall be the fun start of how this culture will have its impact. Even if it's remade commercial twice.

Nice touch on the monotony acting at the end, really strikes at the subtle horror of it.

Cough education industry complex. It's rote machinations, promising careers that lead towards no self-direction.

Trying not to caricature

Tried not to caricate Elon Musk.

Oh well, it's been in entertainment from its inception. Try not to get angry at somebody who has destroyed a distribution for artists/entertainers along with Steve Bannon, bsky. Out of the frying pan...

Did well even though I'm more of an idealist with my romantic drawings not that complicated, like I needed an editor.

Even with the charity through romantcism, he still gets an uncharitable treatment within my zine.

Careless Leftovers

Its bally creep.

The bally to call attention of short attention. Careless moments of things that are speak.

Little leftovers have from the crypto creep and desire for converting it from the most naive. This is what is leftover, with all the careless things getting more and more careless with less and less curation.

Left and sold. Left and sold. You are the product.

Goldcat Cappy Ultima

 The connection with the more of the desires of it's all connecting into one place of a Fabergé egg, it's all in the bag.

Shine cleaning glimmers of Status, all sibling into a connected point of woven fabric of container. Deliverer of Dreams to a new fruition of being. How dandy it all is!

F___ me i could roll around this like litter.

Hourly media game, professional =/= personal

The problem with certain trends that if you don't follow them you get ostracized. Such as a hoopla and the Pokémon phenomenon.

I will probably be missing out on the hourly Comics so I could only do a joke, not like it barely worked or had any traction. The surprise you pay to do something new.

Everybody talks about Brand even though it's not really a replacement for having a personality, one that talks as an end of itself.

Hitting specifications isn't a replacement for a personality.

So I miss this cargo cult, most likely for the better. Could not even understand it.

Not sexualising Jaimes trans Medicalism

Position Revised with following council of Geeks essays, opinion of him varies.

As a cisgender man, who's gay. Reading testimonies via trans, expecting solidarity with representation within their entertainment.

Listening to other trans in regard to the representation, such as council of geek.

Some don't seek medical intervention when doing transitions, with their medical scars and transitions being fetishes being not the answers, whatever the case. Their feelings matter and deserve a platform going forward.

Learn something new everyday. I'll learn more nuances as I go along.

Ex Nihilo/Ex Post Facto

To make something completely new and to make something completely before, well what a difference.

Attacking the origin of our cultural creation, coming from our Western Latin zeitgeist.

From myth means story and story means beats or the scene, shall we affect the process of our creativity into intuitions codified into or our own mediums. Yet to create something fresh and from the ascribed behind ness. Are those things coming into being.

So it exists, responsible or not. As the existentialist say, existence precedes essence.

From the novelist is the fandom/cover, hackneyed artist. (Paradoxical, yes it is. I am it myself.) Every pre-illustrated design being copied within the algorithm, to feed or to lead. Engagement in what?

Computational vortex, justification

  C - "with" opis "Power-wealth"

Status behind, governance, implied politic

Power Wealth behind.

This is the basic sociological principle underlining each and every action of using interface design of interaction of media companies.

User or be used. Media platforms and its popular publishers aren't our friends.

So It's okay to give your self permission to make bad art, bad for what? If it has intent, then it must mean something else into another time. Immediate responses that don't count cannot be the only thing that matters.

Oh, All this action is directionless within the vortex, how that ain't talked about.

Delirium overload, Weird Art Celebration

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armed_%26_Delirious

Critics may not get the joke, or niche, and there may not be a cult following.

It certainly counts as something new, though, like the experience of capturing old age within armed and delirious.

What a wise fool, a contradiction handling a incoherent absurd world. It all means it's a way to find meaning though, that's the Waiting for Godat that this aspires to.

Accursed farms as done a play through of this work of art part 1 and 2. I can't help this could be misconstrued as ageing gracefully.

Our old age will come to use, be prepared for it.

So will the weird, obscure art be brought to light.

Indeterminate of pretension to convergence

What a complicated way to say focus. Yet logicians in philosopy don't pull there punches when talking there jokes to academics.

Such as the troubles of learning to forcibly focus, isolated and into the trials.

Not wanting to be picked, not being selected within the right place in the right time.

Merely sticking towards a Wacom screen and not looking at the second screen. Along with thinking as an unglamorous producer, then not. Wrestling with the plumber paradox.

A ditch digger though, what a method to loosen writer's block, to loosen it's holding.

Then, when it publishes, the body of work continues.

So what is ultimately sold to the advertiser on platforms is tension, distilled.

Pretentious Hack

Who'd you trust? The honest hack or the pretentious one who calls himself and artist, wanting his tantrum taking seriously. 

The taxi driver who delivers, delivers you weird yet still on the point, or the one somewhere different where it completely does not work. Believing him the 'artist'? Despite the creativity being a liability.

Such is a retrospective of Doug Walker's the wall, the review that labour'd a risky commercial expression. It's bad.

Other that the complete contradiction of it being a love letter, along with the lack of an attempt of a soft sociological point of view being expressed. Because its comedy, contradiction for amusement? Or not..

I'd care for the inconsistencies if this was such an insult to a work of art. It was a literary endeavour, Doug's was, unintentionally.

no. There are plenty of reviews on the pretentious review, that you may have seen. He won the race to the bottom.