Hustle-trance/Overpayment scam alert

 Could only draw this impression of something. Welp, 800$ in order to get a 'refund' with a fake paypal. With a hustle of a discord, voice chat urging me on. With that plausible deniability, doing the barest minimum to get away with it.

Sombody tried to hustle me with the easiest scam in the book, prerentious playbook, so i switched back into serious character and blocked and reported.

Say no to spammers.

Well, I shall call the new hustle-trance, this is from herd morality. Taking it from that concept, and with the entitlement complex of profit. Got that from the liberal seth.

Status and Culture

 

Even out of the bounds of our epistemic enterprise of our academia, the main road's status motivations, and incentives still persists.

" Everybody is fishing for status, let nobody tell you otherwise " some Dragon Odendo, altered quote, probably. Well, Transcend, for that matter. By junction of there engagement. Social is the proceeding semiotic of economic, that's made of exchange value and set - price. Price, meant to stop haggling by the Quakers.

After the price and the exchange, there's the use value of the physics and mechanics of the things produced, artisan craft on the things of those who own their conditions of labour.

So Status, Rigour (sometimes that happens in academia, to and not.) Pretending not what other people do.

Status is a invisible ruler that effect to our micro decisions. From scarcity, to our abundance.

Other concepts i picked up 🛋📖 ( from the status book, author comes from fashiony background. )

Kitsch/Avant garde distinction

Epigone, in art of imitation, Exemplar by Immanuel Kant

Newmania:

Seeking the new cool thing on microblogs.

New = not exactly better, since to desire to see new entertainments via media.

Hysterisus :

Lagging behind in Greek, etymology. Used to describe another phenomena of trends in the data.

That's personal definitions n note. Possible to change.

Quite the sensation of how it's organised, with it being abstract of s

The land of no boundaries of business guru maxims

 This vision were all the matter. 

With mass advertiser. Goes into the hustle trance.

The way of the machine zone of playing an eternal economy game of physical pleasure/pain, all the complexities between. With the emotional ways and emotional states, compared to the physical states.

Then I'm trying to clamber for an extension, then I'm not, getting substack posts via business gurus, are well, people who happen to keep working, it's all the advice of people who keep workings

How is the motivation doing, self-industry complex? Any benefit? You don't have to follow any of this advice if you don't have a problem. They are nebulously reaching for better within the void of extrajudicial lands.

Thanks, I guess, then there's that phrase in snarl quotes.

Personal brand, not caring about strangers. Guess that's the confirmation a publisher does using the legal fiction. With what a publisher does after all the labour is all collected, his personal value judgement is there.

I can't blame that kind of mindset, if he's running an independent, giving free advice if it does not work or not.

At least you're not selling anything, bud! Well, bought into this.
Took your test on your blog.

Such entertainment 🛋️💭

There you go, into the sunk cost of getting a book deal (or not) I know you're trying to help. With words of authenticity cropping up again (Illusionist entertainers aren't), then it's the reason this will go.

Where will you stop with the how-to roulette? Reverse engineer.

Well, continue on with your generalities.

(You could consider pablum, what do you think?)

This one's fascinating though, creator economy he's coined? Idk, this may be what publishers give a sunk cost to creatives (Petit boug) Who happen to build their labour of signals of distribution.

Have some more, Philosophy wannabe. Signalling is talking about semiotics? I'm still reading that Umberto eco book with all the academic reading.

He's a slow-down kind of man, I'm a stay-in-sync-with-yourself-man

Solving problems? I like to give my characters problems.

Well good sir, good going on a sunk cost. 🛋️👍 Like I am.

"Stay Sovereign" Was the email.

The internal theater of angry visions

Fuming. It happens, its ephemeral, only in an instance of any newsworthiness  buzzwordiness of each celebrity passing.

That impression.

Obsession and pretension over porn interests while keeping NSFW porn intake under wraps. Then they return to the popularity contest. Macro scale, impossible to control.

Pretend is to claim/demand etymological, everybody's a critic, everybody's a reply man.

Oh, How I desperately need to curate it all, How I need responsibility.

So my algorithm ( ha ha, they say there's none, fire hose is an algorithm ) bubbles and filter.

Thanks workplace. Time to self-regulate again.

Holiday of convention convenience. Or on the arc of justice.

I hope Grandad gets the card.

Look at all those presents and pleasantries. I need family, actual family. Not a family that's found, or showing up, well. There's a book for that now, so many specificity I can get to.

Happy Holidays!

Second order effects / Human rights / List of Philosophy

Oops, social media all status roles, I must return to be academical shell and see if I can see enlightenment.

This is my Ecosia gamification stats, by the way, that's positive externalities.

 That's the alternative of Consequentialism.

Categorical. Be it with opinion of citizens, or enforcement of institutions.

Oh, Oh will be putting this from emancipations  For current marxist academic theory, well, it's got plenty of podcasts and others.

Whatever the intention falls. Does not matter to a consequent along with it's spreadsheets.

I got this from this philosophy list, that's a load thing to add to a list or not. For beginners/intermediates wanting a refresher of the moral principles.

Is this too western, though, too American? Welp, Other than open university, beats having a wrong microblogging education.

Poem - Planets align

When the planets align.

When they are physically connect.

Then maybe.

Things are seen in a new way.

When they do.

Doom or Boom.

To our town.

Will come and go.

 

Net neturality felt prosumer, refuted.

This is the aftermath, of a post I picked up by a Marxist-Leninist Anime Girl, who was right.

• The net-naturality felt like it was a pys-op by Netflix.
  
  @naijeieoas Dec 14, 2017
  
  "They uh… they could do this before the NN scare and they never did. Even with the rules in place they still track you with packet injections.It has actually *never* been about getting charged for social media, because companies could always do that too and they haven't. Not that Comcast is innocent in this, since what they were charging for Netflix's access certainly hasn't been lowering the cost of service or building out better infrastructure. The price I'm paying them now for a whole 3 MB/s down should be criminal.
  
  Long story short, #NetNeutrality is a scam by tech companies to go after ISPs for eating into their profits and you're all being duped by these scare tactics.Latest take I saw today was that if NN was repealed, then how would “families with multiple children” be able to afford Internet access. 😂Who in the world is delusional enough to think wired ISPs are going to be able to charge per user, as if that's even technically feasible.
  
  Most wired ISPs only see a router anyway. There was a time (way before NN was a thing) when some of them didn't like home users using a router, but the routers came with MAC address spoofing to get around that problem and the ISPs could do literally nothing about it.So they stopped caring. And besides, do people really not realize how expensive it is *now*? I'm a single person and Comcast has been $60–$80 the whole time I've had them, for 3 MB/s down! Hell I get better speeds for only slightly more on my phone!NN rules have had (___) ALL to do with the actual pricing of websites or ISPs. They've always been able to charge anything they've wanted. The FCC rules never changed that. All NN says is that an ISP can't charge extra for access to a website (which they never did to end users)
  
  I will keep yelling that the origin of the current situation is Netflix whining about having to pay Comcast for data center access and making a big political issue out of it so it didn't eat into their profit. Everything else is ahistorical, metaphysical, emotional appeal."
  
  
  This is, of course, related to their side of the inter-bourgeois fight called net neutrality, they being the first to really push the idea that it has anything to do with end users. In reality, they simply don't want to pony up any revenue to the companies servicing this traffic.

Monopoly-capitalism (not a lack of “net neutrality”) is rearing its head in information–mass media infrastructure.

"Net neutrality got taken away when the ISPs were commercialized. All the “fast lane slow lane” rhetoric in the world hasn't stopped the commercial ISPs from charging way too much for access. “Oh but they charge too much for all bits equally!” FOH 

Most people don't even know what QoS and network traffic shaping are (and how much they're used on today's Internet) but will still cry about “treating bits equally”. It's such a liberal trap like “free speech” but even communists are taking it at face value.

It all started when the well off middle class people realized they might have to pay slightly extra for Netflix because the large ISPs are competitors in that market, then got morphed into some dorky human rights campaign. Staaaaaaahp."

"I will never forgive this nation for making such a big deal about net neutrality but not about poor infrastructure or monopolistic ISPs."


The inter-bourgeois conflict of “net neutrality” is trending again. She goes. Link

Then, in 2020, she moved away, went to another plane of existence. Thank you for enlightening me and stopping me being so twitter brained with American spectacle. (You don't have to agree with the ideology, btw, )itass commercial polarization meant to sell you of prosumer activism. 

I must continue with my sociology.

We where all sloppers in the prosumer, primordial soup. (Except for the Harry Potter bit.)

Have a sofa seat from my ref folder. A non sequitor.

https://newsletter.rootsofprogress.org/p/in-defense-of-slop

 Thing about a slop, its made us more mindful with our consumption, Our intakes and our Imputs, when we don't swing down the entire Burn-the-internet-memes-on-behalf-of-disneys-drm-repulsive-practices. It's made me think of pleasure, about shock value, about attention. In 1970s and it's a slow, absent doomerism that's only made me want to do something more.

Avoid mediocrity, and mediocre of the averages, with independence of vision. ( Wow, James Gurney, if that's a thing, Commodity fetishism'n all, it's banal now, so now what I'm going to do?)

That's the problem with slop, it's anti-positivist definition, not a metric. Going to like another bara pin-up now at my microblogging feed.

Well, there's an article that's made me think, including Andy Masleys

With all the slop, SEO and all the stuff, the principles of distribution remain the same.

Oh, they're trying to inspiration porn JK Rowling again, I'll post this Verily one

*Prosumerist, it's naturally, physically impossible to disassociate from consumerism. Only get post-scarcity.

at the end of 13:00

The perks of obscurity

It's all a blur, so many little content curation and moderation being what is sold, all in an expanding universe of vendors and suppliers with all their advertising, all a blur, all the fandom/hatedom, all the time, all of it was going in a blur of media heads down the way.

Academics are avoiding xwitter, or microblogs, some of them are in substack, they are going there, I found a good post on obscurity.

Since it's all datum, observable of the lowest stratum of comprehension, the scientific, and the narrative of this is to study, or when with a monopoly/monopsony of attention. Fame/infamy explains the entitlement complex of status value and cultural capital.


There's little attention. No data for interupption advertising.

No Ruthless expose industry complex, the need to make dramatic fiction to draw attention.

Thousands of merchandise, gone.

Fan fictions all around. Shippers, and all that.

No Status value to follow.

Cherish this moment while it lasts, I trust you, don't I?

( Oh, I've still have to learn to do a sales call, and a payment specification. )

What did Zig Ziglar, a conflict avoider, says with the data generality and a meaningful specific? Or, a semiotic specific in a chain.

Why i may not be a comic artist.

Contemplation, I'll continue zining. Yet a need the negative space to propel forward.

• Low pay: Lack of wages since it's one of the passions that can't be fuelled and be profitable, that's a reality with most creative industries. Or, oxymoronically, it's due to creativity might not pay off, an indertinimate amount of trying to make something new.
• Abusive Supervisors with awful labour management practices/ No labour protections: This comes from expierence, I brushed with them twice , Well, with graphic design/illustrator jobs.
  I learned more from Eric Helms bodybuilding pyramid and then that. Realistic, enjoyable, and flexible.
• Hustle Mindset: Level up! Power scaling! Amelioration for the sake of it, when all the labour puts down with the distribution being sent online for a microblogging platform that only expects pornographic performances, or something to that of copywriting. A mental model that's never good enough with the metric that can harbour averages.
  
  There's a ladder, and there's a bridge to sell you, so many with the how-to-industry complex.
  
  
• Art is mere copyrighting commodification: Well, You know if you know. At least I know I'm a hackneyed entertainer for transparency of my aesthetics with what I show, like a magician's illusion, because I find it fun to hold attention. They do have a vanity with the delusions of grandeur. Especially with the industry of publishers of copyrighting for them with PR. Lack of self-respect with the field of not protecting there labour.

That's water is wet moment. Yet I do it anyway.

 Other than that, the vision of making a storyboard to life continues.

Getting under someone's skin

Rage bait, Oxford noted This is the word that of those who use

Well, even with the direct response tickers here. Even as the liberal Seth goes on, (Why do I still follow? Well, it's on trolling, and those who try to crawl and squirm under your skin.

Yet this engagement is what it is, teleological presumption reveals parts of the character. From the accuser rather than the accused. That's Friedrich Nietziech for you. That perspectivism, (Some conservatives share that aswell.)

Come one, and come all.

Fox Key
" It's so weird how the people who most claim to hate social media, technology and modernity are the most unable to leave it. At some point that's just a failure of character. Like, fine, everyone needs a phone to get around and email people or use Slack or Teams or whatever. But did you know that most normies don't use Twitter? It's true. Most normies are already better than you! "I'm too addicted and Twitter is making me post every day about how much I hate Twitter!", brother, most people do perfectly fine without scrolling on social media 200 times a day. "I'm posting to warn others and do praxis", actually, you're posting because you're addicted to praise and the follow number going up has created a psychological dependence. And it's fine, but if you hate it so much it's a failure not to leave it. "

if you pontificate about attention

One may getting pretentious, and unlikable.

Lack of self-awareness or no anatta of non-self of being a hack/proffesional.

So, All this meta-recursion is all the moment of monetisation hits I dip out.

It's the most naked new-mania. 

So it begins again, and to the meta, people making money by teaching others to make money online, with the business models having to be unique alongside and tethered to the under structure of the digital landscape.

Unless if it's about advertising, by Seth Godin, Or Tim Wu's the merchants of attention. Or even Mathhew Bartholomew's Ad-creep. Can only take so much pretention in a day.

Inimical to the fictional true justified belief, along with fictional Legalese, so handle with care.

If you know, you know, sex work vendors/suppliers governance

There was this cartoonist who did this graph, this is from memory of digital dreams.

Yep, NSFW do get paid better in extrajudicial spaces, why though? Well, It's meme'd as he his commented on the sex work got debanked, commenting how publishers bamboozle creatives with NDA's and sussy licensing deals.

So, ahedonia aside, got further comments of this reductionstic. Physical mechanism and the clerks that do it?

I here plenty of flippant accounts with the porn community, or the gooning community, and then there's the masturbating yourself to death with substack posts. Is it a dead end? Well, It goes back to Queens blade critique by Bennet the sage.

" queensblade of being too good at targeting their intended demographic, but that doesn't mean it has to come with all the narrative baggage that it does in terms of succeeding with their demographic as well as being a generally alright story, queen's blade falls short

of my little pony "

Well, that aspect maybe why they call is sex work, since the illiterate audience who only cares about that aspect will be an left to feel like doing something better. Even Seth dismissed it with "A/B testing leading decentralised hosts leading to a porn site."

"Cookie cutter porn accounts farming commissions" - anonymous, It was with a somebody dissatisfied, and it's coming along with my own that, this idea that you have to do it, is the pervading idea of sexcess, forced labour. It can reek of desperation, or it can not, If they are friendly, I'm not calling it out, only picking out the hustlers, because fewer hustlers mean I can get more honest conversations.

Guess I'm not a gooner, to an obsessive compulsive disorder.

I asked one of the sex workers, and I attempts to clarify my own thing, too much of response rate rather than any literacy, it's too casual.

"That's the problem with the physical mechanism of sex/asex work, it can get so reductionistic to exclude literary genre." I typed to one of the rule 34's, and with that, if financial extentionism is all they care about. Then, that ain't exiting.

Since, the governance will have to go anarcho-syndicalist or communalist with no enforcement, (look up, shadow libraries) otherwise it will have to be a keep-scrolling and self-governance kind of affair, Extrajudicially. 

They are going to deal with certain kinks being illegal. With this brute fact reductionism, stop acting infantilizes and tantrums. ( That's anarco capitalism for ya )

Start to be taken serious, not like the prosumer ways of a gamer. Fatalism and predetermination. I wish the porn vendors well, other than that.

Tom-Fishburne Cartoon. Unfortunately, since the ab-testing of the hosts leads to a wild west and Kim Kardashian Meta, I'm not so sure if being cute and entertaining American audiences with a mawkish look at the sex industry.

It's a doomed excuse without the organisation. So I'm going to have to be more picky with the untagged hustling on microbloggers.

Hustling by definition is dishonest money-making.

Since sex work (and work as in being nebulous that It can capture forced labour) can force a toxic notion of sexcess. < Further Reading/n essay.

Marked for death/Marked for life

 Since certain things are blind side themselves, the doctrinaires that fly in my for-you feed with the occasional posturing the random beep boop hate.

I don't have to time, An alternative opinion is what I'm showing.

Already, they could frame this tweet, quote-mine it, then make it into a call-out post to try to get clout, yet I know better. Well, esteem, it's one big fluff of a drug. Only thing to proceed now to see others who have been through the dip and blocked, with the way of having.

Not curious or interested.
Do they realise that I'm dancing and contacting the catgirls and the furries of open-source, along with all that LLM/diffusion model discourse? Well, If they find this and take offence, that's a life.

Gamers are so, so behind on this, it ain't even funny any more.

@aelkus.bsky.social‬
"it's doomed on arrival it's doomed on arrival.
Hard to know where to begin. "AI" includes things as simple as heuristic search (go to first few chapters of the market-leading textbook). It is checking your credit card for fraud (neural network's early usage was in bank/credit transactions). Verbal creep is akin to what happened to "algorithms"
People's relationship to "slop" is also complicated. I hate a good deal of slop but also am an unabashed fan of AI-created cyberpunk electronic mixes, which I take mostly for what they are as background music much of the time
Framing as "anti-AI" at best gives you a high-end status market category, like "GMO-free" and crunchy stuff that eventually gave us RFK Jr and antivaxx crowd
I think a much more feasible thing to lean into is just the consumer backlash that is going to come after vendors realize corrosive effect of low-quality saturation 
‪Damned Robot‬ ‪@supremerobo.bsky.social‬· 3d

----
AI will probably end up being what is used to filter out Chinese factory dropshipping goods on Amazon once consumer anger forces action

---
barriers to entry will go up and its going to be interesting to see what kind of signifiers of quality will win out. history suggests they could take many different forms
i don't really have much of a clue about what they will be, in large part because vendors' interests also determine this as opposed to just consumer demand. remember chaos after FB tweaked its content recommendation/boosting software repeatedly? Fortunes instantly lost overnight
i do feel fairly confident that the crunchy approach probably leads to a dead end

Me too, as I looked into it.

Debate aggro

I haven't been found out by them yet, with my positions, with my ideas being blacklisted.

All part of the business of being rejected.

So, what happens when it comes to trolls who aggro and seek clout, then it's time to deny. Between status seeking and the status rejection (Recursive status move in of itself) then it's a go ahead that we are the times of our those who attack.

Those who is a doctrinaire

Those who bully

Thoe who trantrum

Welp, Seth? What do you have to say about trolls? With your public domain contribution?

 My feed may need curating again, from spammers and troll.

Have a video.

I dive in the black culture, Josh Johnstone and FD Signifier.

In the words of Josh Johnson "Art can save your life. But entertainment will never be your salvation." Sinners, I see.

Still following F.D Signifier, his one on Charlie Kirk had quite the intro. So this is the video where he goes into the Hollywood and vertical integrated media does to independent creatives. Oh the hacknification of it all. So that's being the welcome to the machine all over again.

I don't know if I'm an ally or not, I'll leave that to the black communities
to decide.

I'm in the autistic beep boop culture, learning disability. Along with trying to sort that mess, that's where I'm positioned amongst the community map.

F.d Signifiers makes culture preserving, even with that wrong ai water take he did. Even if he goes deep into the silly ends of hating the prosumer spectacle, which i seem to ignore, which others have taken a anti-vax like conspiracy mindset too. I'm hiding with the catgirl open sourcers till a lot of the smoke passes through.

Paul Klee

Those were by another hand. The last two. Anonymous of outsider art.

Noble Savage act

"The whole thing is a really nice populist narrative for super online people. It works well because it proposes this idea of web capture, not due to user preferences and shifting technology, but because evil CEOs want it. But it doesn't align to reality

.‪Key 🗝 🦊‬ ‪@keytryer.net‬· 1d
I don't like Doctorow/Zitron noble savage user view of the web, which to my understanding is: 1. Someone makes up a service that becomes popular 2. It's bankrolled for a while by investors 3. Eventually, founders decide they need to make money. They change the design/algorithms/ads."

One of my annoying patterns, institutions do, is to advertise themselves as voices in the wilderness. Yet we have industrialised society. That simply ain't the case.

If you're doing public relations, you're doing public relations and speaking for a team that's building up for a performance. Company or not.

Or is it some buzzword, coalition, group, comradeship, meeting, b-corp, corporate and Team.

They conceal with the same signifier, if its representative or single, do claim it. Save a lot of confusion and vulgar populists.

So there it goes.

In the wilderness, a badposterior, Iconoclastic, contrarianian, unjustified.

Into the wilderness. Away from civilisation and being a civilian.

Surgery checkup, public service.

This is for my hernia, I'll have to make sure it's quick and painless. This is a checkup, on Thursday.

Physicalism has made a public good that has served us, for good or ill, depending on that. It's why i made Kyro a civil servant. Freelance, and a Bodyguard for the silvers.

I'm looking at governmental videos, this one economic justice by a Sheffield professor, scary topics of polemics don't scare me any more. Well, except for America, and it's obsession of spectacle, being unserviceable to everyone.

He talks about Reforms, yet I'm leaning into the non-negotiable ways of revolt in decentralised lands.

Yet I don't like being infantilised by the entertainment industry complex, wanting their bread and circus. Hardest thing getting exploited by that, the private companies
, including their pr lackeys over that. They will do anything for that clout, even I may be clouting with this post.

(Post edit Couch Gregor, Yeah, finding new videos on my tab and algorithm, finally, including a builder's one. That's some of these days in my diary. )

The wretched of the earth : a cautionary note on reactionary humanism

(I did the audiobook, I'm trying to remember my impressions.)

Reactionary Humanism, and Reactionary Essentialism

Dismissive self-abnegation and wanting to return to the mechanism of simple returns, masquerading as a humanistic drive is reactionary, sorry.

Humanism itself has served colonalist ends of a unjust hierarchy of state domination, as Franz Fanon states. Then we now the ideology is like any other, something we can lose faith into.

Recognition and resource distribution, under and over our with a just rule of law that determines our process. Will be in the evolution, not being bullies, and landlordism that this book describes. Such is the john lockean justification of seeing everything as a fronteir and private companys overlooking there negative externalities.

Well, scientific management of our attention, through body and intellect will be a slippery slope of doom. Humans along with its artifices. Not a doom I like.

Thanks for the Caution.

Clown shoes to youtube? thoughts on glamour medium.

 I'm not in a state to make YouTube videos. Since reaching a mass audience is a matter of crapshoot, a commitment. Everybody is everywhere, even with Seth Godin and other marketers everywhere.

That's value.

Why oh why, I must seek metrics, when I can only see it through the conduct of others and the direct market measurements with the metrics, when they follow through and power leads into new leaders through all the way. Yet I know they all do underground electoral meetings of status. There's only a baseline of interest with the celebritydom of social media.

Am I survivor seeing all the status functions happen with each point of time?

Oh well, the tension of the typographical and Televisual mindsets are always with me.

Materialist semiotics

Nice outsider art.

The beauty of our incoherence

Down to our linguistic beginnings.

Sememe, introduces new concepts that those most reductive concept of meaning. Along with its structuralism into a mindset of a wholistic splendour that I'm happy to delve in. Hopping from Lenin and Althusser and all those from the past of Marxist Leninism, it's certainly a dive into what it means to knowledge in post-llm era.

Such is today, as I've remained my sanity with Susan Haacks Foundherent Positivism/antipostivism synthesis, along with the criteria of the analogy of the crossword of figuring out a play of words to fit in within interpellated spaces, signifying meaning with the ways the lead into a holistic picture. So this book aligns with its knowledge, with the attempts to help bring a structuralist take on this new turn of events.

Casting down the singularity, while also brushing side the misrablism I see on microblogs.

Or, that's how it's seen, or what helped my soundness of mind with the LLM/diffusion provocateur wars between Musk/Sam Altman, with the forbidden fruit knowing a new framework that rejects of fundamental radicals (Except for the licensing ones) No fixedness with the sign and signifier, providing the structure of understanding an interpretation that fills the bowls.

So yeah, I did enjoy it, even at the little memoir at the end. There's little gems on the long tail of distribution like this. Do recommend.

Doing something you don't care about ; a good doomerist post

What happens when you commodify?

All merely at the breaking points rule of law?

Just do rule 34 art and tail popular entertainment campaigns?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just make sfw cutesy relatable comics while having no editorial work

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just do stuff at Buzzfeed with listicles and other things?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just just just.

I do respect this doomerist substack article.

The lonesome death of the last copywriter

"I’ve had a growing frustration with the way AI skeptics, especially my comrades on the left, dismiss the likelihood of mass AI job replacement by pointing to quality problems that are both easily and affordably fixed.

Most creative jobs in the US aren’t making art that people care about. They’re making corporate slop that everyone hates, but which is necessary for doing business. The only people who will miss the human slop when it gets replaced with AI are the humans who used to get paid to make it."

Aaah, respect. Well, If it happens or not, have a look.


Listening to te the one and only Garth Marenghi's Bursted Earth. Or I could listen to Snoop Dog's voice read voices to me on Speechify. Which is more mediocre. Seth said it best with his own doomerism, anybody hustler stuff that he can use Stable Diffusion that's pretty alright, or the one and only illustrators he alludes to.

Or that, not rehortically, more convincingly. So that's his commodity fetishism and prestige. Magic and mysticism that can't be judges from the algorithm mindless data-landscape.

George Bridgemans teleological

 From Aristotle and Hegel.

George Bridgman tried to teach a way of rymth to his students.

Purpose, destiny, and fate. Since I follow a sociological doctrine, involving constructions and instructions of function.

The internal purpose, or the motive they say within a presumption apprach was one of the ways George Bridgman taught.

Yet it's all writing lesson, all the experiences now that I follow a clearer approach with those who are methodological. Such a path that means that will one will flourish into new avenues. Thanks, to a new page.