ouroburosian

 Well, This is what happens with the self-reference, unlike if it revives and reinvigorate.

The problem with tautologies that they can exist purely on a theoretical plane with no batting back and forth of ideological with all the understanding, the pushing forth. Almost like as if it was selective.

Same as obsessing over a fixated piece of evidence. 

An atheist must concede some points to the theist to see if they are not intellectually designed. With the theism and tradition being ingrained with the culture.

I ain't a theist. Maybe that a compatibilist ways of having faith into responsibility or believing into a faith.

Its not contingent.

Who's afraid of gender?

I've tried to put gender into my art, with it taking it seriously rather than an annoyance.

Oh Judith Butler, haven't read the others yet this one without the audiobook experience, and it's the anti-gender movement that's within the growing collective shout and other evangelical groups, this is a ideological dissection by an anarchist. (Expect the words authoritarian and totalitarian to be used here and there, although I don't think such of a meaning given my own position.)

It does get in the core clarification to sex/gender as a co-construction with Anna-Faust-Sterling, and it's the best part, along with shooting down how gender is an imperialist invasion made by the Vatican. Such a matter is a physio-semantic construction of not understanding what gender within the conservative groups. It is all but a phantasm.

Such is a matter to transition from fundamentalism to foundherentism in terms of epistemological structures that we are to see a shift from these ruling and attacks, from collective shout and the moral majority.

Alex avile and Abigail Thorn, two youtubers who have delves into such a matter for defending transgenderism. If you'd like the light version.

( Oh, and the note of the lack of literacy of those who have merely read the bible along with those who have seen YouTube videos is something to note with the audiences to this kind of regressive campaigning, some have only read the bible, some others read minimally. Others have circled with the books, so this bookspeculation. )

Sunk Romantic traps

Romantic reactionary, into a selective trap that regressively brings us.

One within I did learn from William Shakespeare is that love is blind.

Emancipatory love and love of hate, and along with the desires of our existential love with the means of mawkish love, do all of these things prosper.

Yet love, It's all a means to understand where the sunk costs come in.

Sunk as it cannot be taken back when it's gone, or sunk as a hand on a cushion.

So here it goes, another sunk romantic wishful destiny, coming in and out with the attempt done.

prosperity manifestation refutation

Taking bits and bobs from philosophy students, again due to my lack of credentialism of the matter.

Rhonda Burnes the secret makes inroads. Again, the growth YouTube of promising others to be celebritys/influncers are based on this. Including with it, playing with the verificationism of direct response.

Wow, even the smallest viable audience may share something with that logic. Yet that can be a means of communication and commodity fetishism.

Have another prosperity gospel refuter I guess when It comes to videos.

Jaimes Neopaganism diversion

Everybody needs to believe some kind of hobby and ritual, otherwise they'd go mad with no sanctity, mine with the dreamcatcher the Indians did, and there are spirits, FAE like beings within the wind.

Something will have to believe in something, to placebo, to get through the day.

Yet from believer to a sinner that I'm to go through my belief system, such faiths are to be tested. I can only rely on to be redeemed through secular management of understanding my place to life.

Such entertainments are to be done, then left.

symmetrical reasoning, symmetrical couch Gregor with fallacys

I look at the primal inner motivation by Robert McKee's character, editor.

What is satisfying way to see the alignments of all reasoning going in a palace of two uniting opposites.

Yet that is a balance fallacy. Justice/injustice is being threatened and resorted, yet at what fence do these things lay?

I used to believe with the fallacy, being a liberal gay

Oh, only with such simplistic beliefs, and there are ways of knowing that hold with narrativising with ones that go along with our own day. Balance fallacy and Black & White fallacy seem to be opposites, yet we forget those are made with informal fallacies that require empiricism to back up those assertions up.

Oh, it does translate well within making energy within narratology, such as life and death within an action, or a black and white values of a painters brush and transition.

Yet such a matter does not translate into a world of politics, especially politics.

It's not so simple with it comes to handling injustices on a societal level.

Ideological pick & mix argumentation

My historygraphy, I can't see without my historiography.

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_Clinic
Ah, those who argue, it's full of it on the internet.

The arguments, why such a matter of ipse dixit is a matter of what happens when you go on the Internet.

Hmm Seth..

Dogmatic circles, such things, go in circles informally to help us through the day like breathing air. Yet at such a time when an argument that it's going to happen with arguing with a gender denier. There's something about it that they simply don't want to listen, to see if they are arguing within bad faithed troglodyte.

That's the problem with such a matter, they are either trying to argue from a fundamental precept of informal groups within thick tanks and so forth.

Since trolling and spamming will exist since the internet follows through, it's a matter to know how much we are products to our social media sites with these bad actors, or the tantrum industry complex is being fuelled. It's not a matter of childism, adultism, and maturity, it's seen the gap of illiteracy that challenges our own ways of seeing.

Arbitrary contradictions and inconsistency lead into another turn. Preach to the own choir here.

Defying the will of god by looking at men

1980's, evening from the asylum window of the Covenant

 "Heathens!"

"What a shame that the invaders of our sacred orders that will bring use destruction to our desires! Such the holy, immutable of sexual essentialism. To the immovable identity ascribe to the order pre-ordained from the worthy word of god! We betray him. Such a terror it is. With our ideas, or customs, our traditions, our traditions, deny our dimorphic destiny of the sacred union between man and woman."

"Defiler! Do not look at men! They entice you, they get use, pray inside yourself that those temptations happen to creep inside your mind. Forbid it!"

"The darkness of the two moons will get to you"

authentic;artifice artification

From W.place live

I must consider the antonym that fits best, Obscurity for Clarity feels more fitting, along with now, It's time for authentic opposite and more symmetrical reasoning, if that means anything, triad or quadruple reasoning will have to rest.

What's artifice? Is it necessarily bad?

No, It's got no free will, it's only through its functionalism that we can ordain its purpose, it's not fair to treat it like an autonomous thing. I can't blame it for anything, Its responsibility is that like of electricity and energy.

It's all a tension and release. With no consciousness, the designs of the de- of the orginal users here.

Users of work schedules can be good or bad, if not personalised, it can be bad, each accordingly with the mileage that can vary.

So boop boop, or, it's something I thought with this video.

40 min, I'll have to comment on this again.

( Especially on the intrusive thoughts, as for unsolicited advice. Some good, some disagreements with the dystopian/utopian fiction, here'n there.  )

Welp, yeah, I'm doing a philosophy student again, I always go back to thinking about thinking, aren't I? I could to it all day. Meta for Clarity… Oh dear, obscurity. No wonder advertising has influence on other sites.

What all this consciousness and neural networks with Ai is showing the oddity and credibility of the chinese room experiment, so I'll go further.

Psychosis not, From Anti-theism Physchobabble in a subsect of Anti-Ai

 https://minihf.com/posts/2025-07-22-on-chatgpt-psychosis-and-llm-sycophancy/

Nope, I don't think this covers psychosis, it's reminding me of the way atheists accused theists that they are crazy. This was refuted, and it's not going to happen. The insane asylum ain't coming back.

No no no, let's not try and bring the insane asylum back. With the method being in the madness.

Moving past of the Victorian insanity accusations, we are to make it our pursuit to see how we can decipher and see mental illness and disability as a thing to go with, and that means AI too.

I could point out a bunch of men and suits with money as a bunch of freaks, yet that does not go to the heart of ideological and material conditions. It's going to get unhistorical.

Eschatology, End times have been with us all this passages, Yet's that associated with all cults like scientology and bebops comet. Including, I must say, Atheism science fiction.

survivorship bias

 Overlooking the fact there are so many, from the ad creep, the ad creeping horizon of expectations. With the crawling sigma grind set and the crunch culture. That happens to be the case of the odds one out with courses.

Swimmers body all over again, instant results, before and afters, edits, get the she-bang in the flash, transform in the snap of the fingers.

Yep, too good to be true 
Survivorship bias, like fallacies, are informal fallacies which can't be quantified and need credibility to back it up. I'm going through my own experience with this.

Should include western ballet thing, yet that's my campism and politics talking. Still reassessing my own positioning on that matter, and will have to come back to you with another editorial.

Never good enough for industry and us

Since i had to check out thought slime some more, here's my fave. Second to the hard work and Garry Vee.

Myself resonating with the anarchist critique of hard work and art commodification, being defined by price. Brings back to the image of imperfection that's back to wabi-sabi. Bad art, slop, it comes for all our lives, since it ain't an exact qualifier, it can't be made.

By good enough, that means the objective infinite money, apparently.

clarity/obscurity

The concept obscurity, how it blocks a little mark of unknownness.
 I contrasted clarity with confusion, yet what about obscurity?
That's, a tinge, a tinge from the conversion rate/direct response of measurement, of the coarseness. That why google became a monopoly/monopsony beyond my comprehension.

Or is it a case of loneliness/alienation epidemic, atomisation, lack of holistic grasp.

The spectrum of cries, the spectrum of voids and the spectrum of the little dives and patterns that unite a little sector of the nets.

(Sometimes I merely auto-write, this is another occurrence.)

Wrong about work hour estimates

I'm being overly meticulous for a point, to the point of calorie tracker.
 

Bearnards boop animation

Current day on Thursday, last day of July. Unreliable work tracker got from this post, with thoughts.

Two fat Monstys -8hrs from idea board 5hrs?

Scar's portrait

-8 hr 31 on pinups of Jon On Plaza.

Double spread's within adult works Frog F'd minus the 33 h

Cover

End cover pinup. These are moments I have done after my workout schedule 5/2 week. Apparently. Even if I cut back on volume.

The lord's ram splash pages.

My blog pages (some of them lost as I deleted the doodles as I was done) Total collective time.

Look it that, my vertical blog doodles are even more inconsistent.

Another with my pinups. Last time it was five hours, it was typing up in m blog.

Sometimes I type in my phone, I read while walking, does that count? Reading for pleasure, reading for essays to learn a thing or two, 

ugh, felt most tired with this one


This was all the industrial tradition of scientific management by Taylor.  Yet I cannot determine or take it seriously, there's only a long succession of mise-en-place and the little.

Then the physical coaches like Eric helms with auto-regulation, fatigue management and deloading with workload sensitivity. That's not even touching on the work, and it's ontological characteristics that It could be questioned. Anti-work and the Burnout society with the virtue of uselessness.

Yet ho ho, all these work hours. They're all so arbitrary.

It's going to take a lot of unionizing and atomisation that will take on the industrial burnout machine, that's already displaced us.

Oh, and remember Ashton Hall's morning routine, there's this thing that it was pure advertising, and it's race to the bottom because it's become a commodity now.

Bragging on social media labour power has become advertisement now, and the cobra effect of that has seeped into it. They

I'll put a gag routine here.

Even with the work hour laws and such. They are not reflected with the advertisement for these kinds of motivational TikToks. Unethical advertisements driven by response rates and audience capture.

This applied latterly with my programming of artwork has been better, so I'll share it.

Unpretentious/pretentious

 An unpretentious deal of quantifiable polls and, shocks, the market share and its predictions

I reflect back to the irreducible, and incommunicable, of the priceless artifices.

A pretentious art piece or literature that beckons more. Unpredictable quagmire of narrative logical direction.

Oh, what a distinction.

Despite the anti-plot smut I see on my feed. It's alright.

Artes mechanicae

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artes_mechanicae

With the medevil of the hackneyed methods of servicing informal groups, this of a circular pattern regarding our desires in contrast with another. That's a matter of where the swings of digital society go.

There it happens, one tip and tack and formulations and depictions collide, then cease to be.

Mechanical acting and mechanical mediocrity that happens to us till community, from outsider imaginations and then into new sectors of the net. Not contingent on the industry structuralisations and then into a new modern era of society construction.

Brick by brick, together, upwards.

Such as with predetermined mechanizations, the arbitrary wills of wild justices. That the veil of blind romanticism of that of our modern society is to be peeked.

incertophobia/incertophilia

Oh certainty, does not exist within this editors-free digital age.

Those who love it as with there are degrees and then there's probability,

From the Georges Moore the open question (Which has been critiqued from various schools of thoughts) Yet I do believe in the process of Quine's irrational sciences

Such as publishers try to find a magic wand to manifest hits or that somehow that it's suppose to manifest an instant influencer deal by hitting the stocks of the internet, through such a mysticism a phantasm of romantic manifestions are these done. Not wholistically though, not systemically, that's thats a danger.

Cannot manifest a chance in that lottery.

Carneades was going with a foundherntist view of epistemology. Crossewordism along with a web, with contradictions assimilating then assorting.
Science does the specification, yet art does not follow that. Creativity does not follow that.

All in the design of our own determinations and creative springs.

systmaticise;formulise

 All in ways of industrials push us from school from the sardines.

Such a pithy amount of reassurances that lead into a circle that's made with, and that's the feedback loop. Unless it's outsider art, then such as the sameface syndrome

here's my history

That ain't a sin though, can be done for pictorial effect. TV tropes covers it. Xkcd and South Park are showrunners that carry on writing. As opposed to snowflakes design, yet another strategy.

What about industrialism, though? This could be the sigma mould of perfectly satisfaction though, so perfect, yet so bland and uninteresting.

Imperfect satisfaction, of the unpleasant kind, can be merely the goal of finding what is transcendently abstract from our own senses.

Licensing Ad Creep? ancaps with there license creep

It's time to revive argument debate garbage-bag ideology

Did I hit my head to ancaps?

That absurd place Seth roasted them now. Economists have dismissed, and still, still they persist, persist like troglodytes under the pretensions to be well-read. They called it a pipe-dream, yet it's still more a bone-dry slave.

Boosting this, Rynd was not a libertarian. It was an odd set of traditions that led into a new set of circumstances. Even anarchists have a historical background and justification, along with Pluralist and other ologies.

As they say, Ayn Ryad not apart from it.

Oh, I'll have to plug in thought slime, I'm going to have to see my own door into his mind, who embarrassed himself.

There are notes, notes of why that she observed and amazed by Scientific management and then making all here fictional hero's like robots of efficiency. Then that was with all the selfish 'objectivism' and self-interest making contradictions and pretensions to the temple of self-service, or the justification of that. More reactionary with that silly idea, and somehow the west gave here a platform, something unique with the conditions of that pro-slaveness, that happened.

Now any sensible argument or construction of subject/object is tainted because of that.

As an edutainer, I must leave with this song of their mantra.

reductionism/holism

 Finally, a word that's opposite of reductions. By Julian Baggini who's been reading contemporary philosophy, well, some would call this pop philosophy, at least I had to get it.

Reductionism served its manner with the attempt of the sciences, and economical means, this verification does not translate to the art and aesthetics.

Realism maths contingent on money, right? Everything down to profit, right? It's not so simple.

Holism (Even associated with odd practices, this is outside of it. Complementary medicine, mysticism) It is the combined efforts of strategic systems that Aristotle, the macro-level of the taxonomy, such is the view.

Why is it the matter of the internet thinking that entertainment and advertisement, of the reductionism model being all there is, that the TL;DR. Concision and cogency for the sake of it.

So, the copywriter and industrialist are distinct, mistaking the parts from the whole.

Meliorism Lottery on Social media

Seth I still follow you, better or worse. 

I wonder what the growth tubers on social media are doing? Stuff that does not work. That course of trying to be one's own boss is still here.

Such a ceo-mindset of physcopoltic

Spams still spam, and advertisement led platforms are still entertainment platforms first, not fund-raising ones. Ad-creep is still ad creep, even with the infinity of the charity out there. International infinity.

Best know what limits.

This a reflection on influencer courses are garbage, here's why.

A lot of them are cropping up, trying to deterimine a cdp of commodity algorithm and market to feed, to makertise the unmarkerteriseable.

What a shame, maybe that thing of creativity and passion are internal and not verified like product are something, I dunno.

Libertine Bopkin and Theo

City of Brickenshire used for maps and commish.

 Maybe the businessman and the Father have something in common after all.

Freedom to be a Lech
Freedom to be a buffoon
Freedom to be a Philistine

Freedom to be a troglodyte

Freedom to be a bully
Things that aren't within the jurisdiction yet can be improvised within a moments notice. Whatever serves the occasion of all pretensions that are made.

Right to hustle

Right to swindle

Right to cheat
Right to defame

right to subvert the employee's expectations

Right to exorcise

right to vice

right to seep in

All Souls Reserved

the is-ought gap of making/publishing frequencys

 Welcome to the machine part two. Of our dysfunctional business models. Of marketability, marketability, of marketisation and unmarketerisation. Such is our commercial or uncommercial strategy.

Oh, I was thinking about frequency, I will put Jay Levinson quote in my writing. Oh, that's trust

Well, that's the amount of way can teach that advertising was a "tax on an unremarkable product" being false, ( I'm misquoting here) Yet, nobody's consistent, at least with people buying advertisements, they aren't going to go away.

I know there's something remarkable with the Kim Kardashian book deals, including the deal with Ninja, cui bono (Who benefits) can be an obvious question here, especially with commercial publishers.

Oh the is-ought between David Hume's is a remix/metaphor of making and publishing, especially digital publishing/traditional publishing. Something ain't translatable with there's a jump.

10 min

Had to think, this does not apply to hobbyists.

I know I shouldn't be reading advice in YouTube comments, yet this one applies
"@Solastiel1 day ago
A well-intentioned version of this advice would be akin to, "don't even think about marketing until the manuscript is finished, then you can worry about appealing to your demographic." The idea that good books possess some innate power to find the right audience by virtue of quality alone is complete Prosperity Gospel nonsense."

Tourmaline, Of our trans fighters. Marsha

Artfight trade with typmomentum

Wow, the writing of a queer sexworker and entertainer could have gone oxymoronic, it does not.

Marsha was killed, Marsha was persecuted, Marsh was into through hate. Through the stories of the Aids epidemic.

The beginnings of a hustler.

A hustler, that name was used complimentary here and not derogatory. Well, with my own baggage with the term. I guess, in the oligarchical logic of our term. That's merely another reflection of the westerns economic pressures that I can't happen to imagine yet feel sympathy for.

Emotional at the end of the contributions, with a redundant 'all rights reserved', don't worry, I'll tell my experiences. There were so many shades to an entertainer that brought to light as she dealt with the strife of the misogyny, transmisogony, and by the river.

What an effect it does have somebody, along with the law that ignore.

Ai Entertainment of infinite jest

Mass television is the most profitable, most attention getting device, and it's the matter where it's holding our interest.

They are cropping up, these other AI entertainment channels. Where they have their own Patreon and independent funding.

Guess I'm going to have to accept that. Are they finding a commodity fetishism with the neophliacs? The thing about slop being an indefinite category, meshing with human-made slop with elsa-gate. Is this slop, though? You decide.

We are way after Adorno with entertainment now.

I'm looking at Neural Vizz (@NeuralViz or the @TheTuringshow)@NeuralViz

Notes.

. Writing is the most important thing. Compelling it is for the narratological sketches of fiction. (XKCD managed to carry) It's merely mini-arch-plots and no anti-plots.
. Being direct with the AI usage, it seems to clear of llms and diffusion models with artistic ethics. Not necessarily infringing, and it's not to clear the political ethics, which my other editorials covered.
. Aliens? "Coming you live unlive"

. How to get one million squillion gazillions views, I guess technologists are racing for that mass virality in google search, never change. (I don't recommend ANY videos like this, recursive meta)

I'll repost that Ls Mark video. When I was most bitter and reading Doctorow.

I need to repost this to dispell search results. From these lottery diggers.
Guess it's not for me.

I watch as our infinite jests that continue. The Harlen Ellision Glass teat rant about hacks who cannot write themselves out of pay toilets. How the humans and mindlessness of Ais. The call of the given up artisans.

ismism ologyology

It is time to recursive logic and ideology itself.

Why, it's a means to look inwards ourselves and into our on untestable logics and maths, not necessarily contingent on our empirical, noumenally existing with such a matter of idea.

Things that are stuck within the headcase until they come out. Into a tunnel of infinite regress.

That's the common objection of fundamentalism as an epistemological justification, since of the continuous bases that follow afterwards. That knowledge crossword ain't existent within foundherntism so it moves into a huge tower of turtles.

Dead Horses and advertisers, Commercial Scientism

It never ends, it's what advertising does.

Like betterhelp, they don't want to end, they want to get attention with their campaigning. Covered it before.

Campaigns are not meant to go away with a debate, over any axis and distinction. You'll see them again. Commercial Campaigning is like Imperial Campaigning, except is a war of attribution.

The terminology matters less than the response here, David Oglich himself did not call himself an artist, he wanted it to be a informational exchange.

Everbody talks about brand marketerising, what about direct response/conversion rate marketerisation.

The conversion rate that's ruthless, and scientism..

Will the behaviourist tradition of putting lipstick on a pig will work? Even a shrewd advertiser like Herschel Gordon Lewis. I'm honest with my fictional entertainment. Yet, it's extended.

Indefinitely for hierarchy.

Atavism Bopkin

 As I regress, becoming amoeba. All my industry furniture instincts reduce to a state of nothingness.

Only an executive node of blip blops, with there's now with our time.

Scratch sloops, more mean faces.

I endorse an amount of manners As these little blips, blops and dorks. That happen to manage to make it about it

Why can't I suck their inner juices?

Take and mould them into shapes?

Make them replicate faster.

flroorpr

Ascetic of Theo

How to hold pleasures back with the games, not playing with the ideas.

All the suppressions of the tide of a demon that was once held back into the oddities that don't fit within the covenant.

So that our urges, our own primal urges, for sex, for desire, for to connect with the idea of our death to our believers, they must be cast asunder.

They are down, down and down with a punishment for it.

That

S***s AI Udemy Review, and other clarifications

(I'll never sketch myself as the nostalgia critic again, and it's not even a coherent expression because it's old stuff, yet.)

Time to describe a bad decision. Following from Seth's Claude Dog Post , I've deliberately postponed this review.

Short version: I've tried my best to not make this an entertainment spectacle by making it into a format video with bells and whistles. Course I took is off-the-mark, and I don't recommend, I then think more about Licence quoting a Cryptography guy and calling it. Due to the illiteracy of licensing, I had to rewrite my TOS.

Longer version

I bought a course by Seth. I'm not convinced with my wabi-sabi tendencies.
I buy it so you don't have to! I'm going through my disagreements and snorting book reviews. Maybe out of parasocial relationship, I've decided to buy his silly course on AI.

Welp, Here are 35 pounds discounted. I could not resist. Most interesting was building a career without AI. Comparing it with the weather and the species like Kevin Kelly. Yet here we go with a another movement I cannot predict.

Then I was recommended of Midjourney and Claude from Seth, and to put it on Youtube, youch. I haven't been into perplexity as it was.

With the ideas here, I'm certain that he's going somewhere here with a workable plan. He had going with something with productivity and value and why others must go and be impresario. A leader and not a follower (ain't that what entrepreneurs do?) Yet, urgh. It's still 85 quid now of this writing.

Axiological arguments of value creation do not apply to a Taylorist Industrialist, by the way, I think he notes that himself, yet that means that with are own urbanism that we are inter-meshed now it's a subject to be explored. That he did within his song of sigificance, 

He then goes into tasks and projects, within how that such a thing will be driven my freelancer cobbler automation and that clients concerned about productivity by the industrialist would as Henry Ford, those are thoughts are another time.

He claims lawyers certain professions aren't gone out of in five years real estate broker, truck driver, a pharmacist, a daycare worker is inconceivably not going to be replaced.

So now I cover with better uses of what techno-domnion and techno-affliation with such a mindless thing, he draws on deterministic free will and Daniel Dennet's Intentional stance. Oh, He also makes a claim that people don't go to Hackneyed Movies from Hollywood any more, I get not courting their opinion. Yet, Disney get's traction.

What can happen with this though is Seth's attraction with determinism as a position compared to Dennet's Compatiblism in regard to interpreting free will when it comes to comparing this tech with autonomy.

I ended up writing the review. (It's going to be licence ramblings from now on. Already done it.

"As a wabisabi illustrator, Independent. The implications of using AI have reached wildfire within anti-ai, I hope copyright cases get turned down because being into creative commons licensing, attempting to out-license it ain't going to work. It's nice to see somebody try to cool the flames down.

It's inevitable that in our times, though, I guess illustrators are either going to embrace or walk the opposite direction.  Impresarios such as us.

I mean, What will happen with disconnection of this day and age. I do hope that there going to be more essays that don't muddy the waters.

Brings me back to Niel Postman's Technopoly, that's such a thing. What the implications with our own designs such as it will pursue the conflicts here. You're thoughts on Henry Ford are poignant.

Thanks."

Got my Certificate, eh, yeah. There's that credentialism that's apparently I have to show now. Ugh, Udemy.

Am I supposed to be proud?

Further notes.

Technopoly out of all the technological books, this felt the most relevant to what's happening today. Even with the last two. This was, despite the disagreement western bias of Cold War terms, eeriey similar to Alex Avile reported on within the second video.

Well, thanks, I guess. I don't think AI-philes will get much, AIphobes will get average with the end with Seth's plan for those who plan to not build their business with it average, cannot fully recommend. He does summarise his ideas in his next post, hmm.

Hmm. Time to revise positions again. Judging from my previous notes.

Considering Steve Klabnick has a similar to mine, with being wary'n technological puritan. Not a Tech opportunist. I'm simply not the industrial bottom line, not Disney, not Nintendo, not King who managed to lay off its employees.

Oh, It's still generative Ai, well that could be a marketing term right now. Now for the last notes.

. Jumping in bed with For-profit companies for content ID is not going to work, a nightmare system as it is. I'd wish they call it copyright infringement, but everything is loaded with RFAA terminology. It is even argued that it ain't the case, the push to make fair use and fair dealings obsolete to apparently control the diffusion models and LLMs. Trying to marketize style will only consolidate power.

Again, licensing tends to encourage monetize/marketerize-or-die kind of logic, which I'm trying to avoid.

. Environment is a loaded gun, none of the essayists or pundits than Alex Avile, fight me on that one. I'd have to limit my micro-blogging after this. Bluesky and Xshwitter aren't going to be deliberately misinformed licensing.

. Education and connections with controlling tech have been noted with Peter Thiel. Along with certain reaction streamers championing it (not all). They should not be taken seriously anyway, anybody who takes thou opportunist ambulance chasers are confirming Neil postman has said about Amusing ourselves to death.

12 minute video, apart from the thing, this is going to move towards a hyperreality. How it is malicious theory to control with aimless categorization and normalisation as the maths cannot be determined by those who preprogram it. I mean Alex Avile has already touched on educational programs who happen to use with the Khan Academy.

This is a question for future generations, and the ones that will come afterwords.

Merely shows how what's at stake here.

Maybe I'm drawing a close parallel to the postmodern villain that Video's Team wrote. Copyright will end with Disney wanting to license our thoughts.

Lets hope for copyright-gate by the sovereign citizen types

(Futurama with that the ad-creep on dreams)

I'm agreement back to Flippo

"Unpopular opinion: the pro-copyright anti-information freedom response to generative AI is reactionary, and it’s bad in all the usual ways reactionary things are bad.
The tech is here to stay. The only thing being decided as a matter of IP law is whether open models will be a thing, or if the big rights holders will get to make a lot of money by licensing proprietary models. As before, I prefer a world where information and tech are free and accessible.
Like, I understand "I don't want to be put out of a job" but I really don't get "I want the tool that puts me out of a job to cost $159.99/mo from Adobe who licenses it from Getty, so I can rest easy knowing it was not trained on anything I made". IP law can deliver the latter, not the former.
Right on cue. Perfectly legal licensed training data. For OpenAI, Midjourney, and Google. Not for open source models folks can hack on and run locally. (If the copyright maximalist doctrine prevails.) All the downside, none of the upside. Yay for copyright!"
He points to this link https://www.404media.co/tumblr-and-wordpress-to-sell-users-data-to-train-ai-tools/

So I pour it, the course and the discourse. I'll leave looking at the AI entertainment channels next time.

reflection on 2008 journal

 

Its same pattern on the back, Wow, Was I naive back then, such a sweet summer child.

Wow, I've written some naive scribbles, and it's all okay. I was young. 18 years of me going through and writing in desperation, selfishly in my journal to see if I could make sense in the world. With the internet opening up and silly marketing opportunity, before League of Legends, before the discovered weirdo reactionary cults.

This is what I have to entertain others, lay it all out, be relatable or alienable in the vast expanse.

Now it's confused, it's bewildered, it happens to meander in random circles going III pure ego'n self. Rather, with my own writings editorial rather than now.

I don't wanna devolve into into childism, Naive I was.

Truth comes out the childs mouth, it's like seeing children's entertainment.

never enough

 An impossible standard, concepts that can't be counted.

Never enough.
Never is a thousand walks and never in thousands of reiterations of routines, interlocking with a mise en place, that's how.
With enough time, all in sync streams want to be 24 seven television. Producers of television are leaving with their celebrities, then into influencers.

Work, anti-work. Fully automated luxuries, huh.
Never enough, the show must go on. Industrial demand for product to be for mass entertainment goes on.
So we write, perform anew.

Then we go again. Stuck in another wet day, another day.

At least, I licensed my schedule, and it's not possessed by a workaholic.

That's a no go.

Bopkin's hernia poem of pain

Nyaaaap pap ba ba boòoooooooo!

Urrgh, oh scritcheys, it's leaking out again. the yarn again. It's floopity over the plate and in the under-belly. Yoouch. Painkillers.

It slouches down and wraps around the groin like a snake and I'll use my paws to push it back up, then the trousers don't fit well.

Feels like a fatty, veiny sausage of slop that I can't get out. It drapes like a gosh darn wet yarn from squigy guts.
Suidgy sloppy flurps that burge with the squeeze of my paws, it's grouse.

Blerp it's spilling from my crotch again

*Schclcoscscsoprrprrpsroprprtppsth"

You hear that?

*Slcscsjlccscoppcspcocchschscoho*

Urhg

Fu-

( Health update: Got hernia, will get surgery for it. Thanks, I given Bopkin all its grotesqueness )

What do my characters think of Ai/Copyright?

Ai

Bopkin and Castella will endorse it, Bopkin an opportunity, Castella a means of confusion. Crump Marcy will look at the funny blur and get think it looks cool in a dizzy kind of way.

Bopkin will be in bed with that, wanting faster and Cheaper, like Doctor Robotinik. He'd probably shove it into a get-rich-scene and then fail
 
Rubarb and Muddel will be in the Dark.

CG encouraged by Bopkin, George by Marcy, Theo and Asheal will be curious simply because of the noise it creates by others. Couch Gregor will be pulled in different ways by Jaime and Bopkin.

Danny, Trist and Jaime will be to most rebelious of it, Kyro will consider it secretly, and abomination. Vera will say those filters ruin her complexion. Dutton and Sucker will object, Dutton Tradition, Sucker becuae it succccccccccccks.

Licensing politics

Bopkin will love to extend copyright to infinity minus a day, and copywright infringe report children who happen to draw that he can't sell into the marketerize. Castella will like the things like they are having. Vera will with the misconception. Dutton Traditionalist will follow with Theo. Rhubarb, CG and George will be pressured in to dubious licensing deals. One into a loophole.

Muddel don't think well, Asheal won't think about it, Marcy will attempt to do it in her accounting, and then it will not mind whichever flows.

Kyro wants to have no business for secretive reasons. Jaime want's it abolished for anarchism, Danny will go into peer pressure along with Sucker Sam. Trist will move towards a punk underground, not following any of that.

(As for myself, suspension. Another post )