What does a meta polemist have to say

What does he say? I can't fully trust, neither. Yet lack of certainty may indicate thought.

Yet the meta-polemics of self is something I respect.

Our Attention, our Clout, our odditys, our conscious

 Take this with a grain of salt, preprints so don't confirm your priors.
Our Attention, our Clout, our odditys, our consciousnesses distributed amongst and placed by advertisers together. War of attention, war on clout, war of our desires.

So this is where there global workspace theory of value comes from? Of the mind?
🌈🛋🌈🛋🌈🛋🌈
There's reason Google got big with the monopoly of our attention, clout, diversity of viewpoints and research excellence.

Then there's some joke images

Peter Coffin own words

Apparently I still browse. And he posted a chicken and got called a p******, such is the veracity of the twitter artists.

Remember I don't associate with his views on Ukraine, im more with the Finnish bolshveik with it being a weak imperialist nation, baba bing, done.

Will jury nullify until inquired elsewise

Wishcasting/interpretive supremacy

That's the point of this indeterminacy.

All over a polemic

2023

Foundational supremacy.

Fundamental

Westboro baptist church

Sacred purity

So pure

Purity ritual of protecting labor = Copyright or TAKING MY MONOPOLY

Elite, popular, contradistinction

End

Nuance is complicity, simplicity is brute banal

 So, when somebody decides that you are ontologically, and most teleogically wrong of a status, and with that. Not argumentation

That's where the hayekian market comes in, with the constructed market and like

Underground Empire

 Critical theory of the holding dialects of sociological control of the underground.

With the abuse of IP laws, and the way of tech is controlled with out the ways these ideas are made with our own desires.

Things like the technocritsm and technowarfare are handled with finesse over the commodity determinism I see on social media, and its a thing that's on the same level of Neil Postman's amusing ourselves to death ( minus his literary chavenism.)

The tests means to control and to come at home have always been an account, matter i can overlook with his handling of elitism and populism in one dance that was like " wow, some freak legit conspiracy of negative organising happening here" 

4 stars

Lose Lose

Horned dilemma

No due diligence.

Running naively.

Into the night.

No way out.

The hedgehog go prickly.

To the face

Handicraft

Handicraft-chavenism

Renting the craft for the banality of societal conventions, to the fanactism have such practice without the harmony in computationalism.

Talent

Innate intuitions don't matter in the long run.

What of a switch

That with it bring

That these skills of mine.

Are things which erode natural expression

And rebuild, and then swing back.

Impulses and linguistic

Prioperception, prefrontal impulses

Natural law, eliminative materialism

Matter again

Troglydyte Leftism, a frumpy disorder.

 Yeah, when Peter Couglan made that horseshoe theory, the bougiegese in 1800.

Progressive means multiple things now, since 2023, we looking around and we don't like each other back when since the atheists where together.

Now its more of a informal machine of youngness that I can't relate too.

And I cannot escape it, can only deal.

To clarify on beep boop

I refuse to be a proxy to mid journey, techcapital venture the artistation fiasco, the -oncepart org.

I refuse to be categorised. Only that to the one and only cyberethicist.

Nuances and complexity ain't complicity, the bank ballance may not contribute to the discussion

Crimes against logic book states that pointing to the prosecuters/defendants paycheck don't necessitate suspicion, we live in a totalling capitalist soceity. Better or worse.

Two types of anti-capitalist critique, making the world better or made at parents.

I made the Japanese soldier blush

Out of sight out of mind.

Made him blush.

The amount of editing i did won't commit a fanatic narrative to know otherwise.

Can't lead a horse to water teaching cyber ethics in this B of an earth.

Even smart people fall for it, silly instuition

Of double wrong

What's the matter with with this polemic?

To the mind

I'm so over*

Since my annoyance of dealing with it and vested interest.

Yet, with controversy. As Seth wrote.

Who stands to lose?

The straight white male ego of the middle class? Well, not really identity. Interpretive supremacy of a status quo, just world within a
or
Some nothing.
or
The symbolic middle class of existential panic who serve them.

Inexorable Fall The reckoning with the falling rate of profit

Ah, Nicolas

We are in a semotic world, of non-symbolic to meaning proliferation. We are within the linguistic meshes of today.

This signals to the middle class alienation and the way technology comes from the lonliness angle, quoting althusser and other modern sociologists in a quest to understand and see where the rate of profit will fall.

Even if wrong, the entertainment industry itself with the spectacle and way it operates brings the ideas of our loneliness of the middle class revolutionary potential now in the era of ideas of our coming epoch. So that with that way of suburban sprawl that our own ideas.

Then there is the delusion meshes we cohere our web of ideas together into a sense of suttonesque village view into the world of others as they way the techno capitalists have calculated ways to provide a lone experience to the outside world, even though that naughty liberal Andy thinks otherwise.

I do feel that loneliness though, as with all these times moving into this coming epoch of more view of a social society as the cultural tech seeps and moves into everything, and how little circles of microblogs to community's of expression of the 'third place' or our right the city, it the radical planning he proposes with moving from the professional class and the middle class like myself as a revolutionary class, to programmer to artisan to one.

Of course, this fledgling programmer in his attempt to build the foundherent bridge (i'm using haackian epistemology.) To build another a mess of crossword intersection, it's all the way that it brings insight.

Slight nit-pick, I'd like more bullet points. for the punch, ty.

Beep-boop angry middle fissure

Snide

Confusionism

Creator economy

Sadness

Life and death

Eliminative materialist hustle

Elite picker selecter

Level up level down Level around the bend

Individual approval of a select few

To the end.

Benefit of the doubt

You don't know how much is given, and when it is granted, it's of a unconnected, undetermined force of consciousness of another scream of a internal will unwritten. Right over there.

Whats a sell out?

A sell out as somebody who puts his idealism/mind away in an eliminative materialist sense whenever they're their own sanctity, moderate coherence, bank balance is at stake. Where the rationalisation come into to a bigger power. For good or ill. With capital commodity relations.

Why i don't debate simple hegelian

In an action movie the hero kills a villain.

Oh, some kind of conflict that happens all the typologies of plots are determined by some form of tension and conflict of physical and metaphysical duality. Unless if it's anti plot spectacle.

Yeah, when I set and controversy or non-happens. I'm left wondering. Is this worth fighting for polimics, determined by

The process preservation of the status quo.

Truth is some people like the hustle culture and just like the posture

And I don't have consistency, are simply don't care about consistency.

No drama at work, huh, can pay off.

Always along lineage of being studied, although we revealed, but never assume

The Samsung avatar nope

A ineffeable abominable self-portrait

This f***** on my Samsung, its me, no ownership, a smoothy Sweden of technical perfection.

Clean as a baboons bottom and crawled out of the mechanic bowls of a crude jetison.

Its silicon valley tack at it's finest incursions generality's that an 🥚 is more specific.

...

Yet, no anger, no fuming comes.

Only passiveness.

Interpassiveness that I can't pathologise

Another political test?

Why... why.

Is this the brit monkeys way of a political compass in the modern era that's odd. It's political compass all over again. No.

oh I looked at his ai video, despite his inaccuracy's within licensing (To be ignored, I've already written about it.) it's pretty sane ending.

Oh okay, Moving on.

To the bear

Got the bear sticker.

Cutie bear

Trusty bear

Mysterious

Brings gifts

Comes in need

Graceful

Gratitude

I still respect ecosia

Still being a guinea pig

To the natural expression

Bopkins Cappy Neoliberal Feed

 Moewoeowo Neoliberalism is back or not don't ask me.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱👏🐱 Hurray Meooooooooowwww.

Reasons for the creative commons here, except for my oc CG.

I have written the most naive, incompetent essay for an idealised principle. Yet,

I believe it. Digit-Ethics Manifesto.

Because they can bog off with there intellectual  smoke-blowing and haughty snootiness of false consciousness. Bears repeating. His spirit possessed me to make the 

Acknowledging the good'n bad. We are not going to take your toymakers away, from commodity toy to art. Drm is drm, I won't tolerate snide worship of.

Slide from the a French techno company. 2 hours it's got politics all over it (what do you expect under an editorial.)

by Conspiracy Theories, TechnoFascism, and the Prospects for a... | James J. Hughes, PhD,

A compound workout of and the biceps and triceps of a bench-press 💪🛋

I've never seen such.. a lack of humanity from the confusionism 2023 megacopyright landgrab, and it comes from the 120  media apparatus of 50 years the fissure of the age tradition of 100 tradition of academia (older).

This won't get along perfectly, they will be conflict. Going through though, feels like the option now.

The censorship of free expression is so foundherently wrong that it's worthy hill to die on.

The laws of the Internet shall make my wisdom immortal. Information wants to be free, and beware those who wanna gate it.

Information wants to be free.

Even with the taint of interpopulist dilemma's it has.

his statue website

Wow, that functionalist description is out-dated as I go with Maggie Vale.

Yet everything is a pure though a internet own boy.

Also, Cory Doctorow in the past, was correct about DRM here. I need to compile it all for the internet artifact that this will be discovered on here.
Transcript of that. There's not good social media, so I'm going to keep this in home base.

Mediocrity and the death, by Seth Godin.

All the data here, ain't it special.

The question remains.

So the ideal of Arron Swartz shall live through all of us, monistically.

That Retweet threat that made me quit.

(Naive that I may be, I know that this may be ideal way. Yet clout, social relations and it's operations, I know it's not going.)

I confess, in 2025. Somebody _____ retweeted a death threat and made me depressed for days, on microblogger. It ruined my day with ideation I dare not recall. Had to leave at that point and consider alternatives. There is no sensible discussion, mindless dogma had ruined to internet. Like the mens rights/gamers vs the feminists back in the day.

To the one who thinks accused and taking it personally, do not, your are precious, and I wish not ill will and harm on you.

I'll be fine. My former Kantian ethist within my several years ago awoken within me. With all the reactionary tech-panic radicalisation.

It's locked within a audience capture, circularity, entertainment vs academics/intellectuals in my field then the totality of the spectacle. Something I pruned out of the for you feed so I could not get stress other than the tiny monopolies of something that ain't essentially contingent on a non-dialectic, on the essencilist of the spectacle.

With the need to transcend it.

Then, Substack with intellectuals, non-intellectuals, kidsters, I know that place has bad bloggers, it's one where academics are and the essay was, the written one. Still the same kind of moral panic with perceived job loss, which is why I made that couch-searching treck between philosophers, economists and political philosophers into an idea.

Will it matter that I decided to learn'n teach instead of fight.

Of an ambitious quest into understanding and trying to help a big-gap of those

Idk what to do with that knowledge, out of the moral desert. That i come to admit now.

If i was to blame the im-an-ally-not-bigoted-buts mindset that drove me out. Along with the American exceptionalism. Something felt wrong and my for you feed was the differentiated.

Doesn't matter of mental responsibility? What we are dealing hear where it's a eliminative mind, yet it miraculously has a mind! The pattern and the phenomena is the capacity to express a compatibilist in this regards for a simple question of ethics.

That's where i started to study that due diligence of sociology academics, left accelerationists and a relational companionists, oss programmers, transhumanists/bio cosmists and out of deontic reverence. Simply because I had enough with the polemics of the mass media and its lap dogs with the open source and it's proprietary venture capitals.

With all these dualitys, I haven't interviewed any billionaire, decided to make my own mind up. Out of the dialectic essentialism and into a former deontic past. Into a dialysis, or to explore an alternative, that's what resonated.

Somewhere 2024-25 I left here, with the For you feed of others.

Is this where your catechisms and constructed beliefs are? A deontic circle of peeps who got what they want. Perpetually, unpersuasively.

That is the curse of free will though, you have to acknowledge the good and the bad and recognize it's desire to exist.

This is how it feels like a techno-progressive who does not use AI ATP with the news. Welp.

Yet I'm too ahead of this when I knew the terminally only peeps.
Jeremy Bentham with the discourse being stuck within sunk costs within america
"If you want to know how AI will affect the world, don’t imagine current AIs simply continuing on into the future. Imagine the world being flooded by AIs that make our current models look like a child’s plaything—and those being used to build the next generation of AI. Imagine, for the first time, creating something much smarter than humans. I don’t know exactly what’s coming down the pipeline, but it will be strange and terrifying. We are summoning digital aliens into our world, and we are not ready, and we are complaining about the water they’ll drink."

Some politely unfollow me at this point. That's good enough, wading in with options undiscovered is part of the price of connectionism we exist.

Now that I must disrespect intellectual property by acting dumber and more gaggier. With a less attention to the punditry.

Guess they can do this if it's means have a sensible discussion. There is none

on the vulgar popular polarizations on the hustle funnel that microblogs encourage

Oh, and to work on my compatibilism bridge of economic transformation of this. I'll follow Flazfire's advice with art. Such is the futility of this in current year.

Beyond Bwubbles, Onto new analogy

🔮🛋

Update, there's a bubble discourse with this. As there are too many cooks.

Oh, don't forget that comment.
This everything is so fast with the concept of the bubble coming in 2022, I've decided to move on with a new state of economic transformation in iterations. Something that IDK what is happening

• Ed zitron. As far from the rumours that the bubbles got the pop with embarrassments, and with his news later, which I have no influence over along with no kinship. OOOPS well he's wrong thanks Ben Garrison.

• Peter Thiel and Mark Anderson and the and copyrighting have taken a different approach to the bubble, saying it's going to lead to abundance, said whole Boomer, utopia of some kind well, or something idealistic of that nature. Nah. (nope) 

• The concept artists themselves fake-believing with the copyright nuke. Think that the bubble will just automatically extinguish, including there employer Disney. Itself into a world of ultimate peace, it's still long going, it's getting more tropeish and predictable by the second, ignored in the low Tier. On that corners of the microblogs that's where it will exist.

• The YOU WILL LOOK SO INCOMPETANT WHEN IT POPS DUMMY by one of the intellectuals on substack I quoted on substack on cloaster. Nah, one poster came as supremacist. Idk something else. It felt like more a showboat rather than a manner to like it. (Post edit, he's went 180 and hates it too with the job annihilation job disappointment,)
  
  
  
  

  
  Oh yeah, the predominant 'left' also predicted that with niche
  Bitcoin, look how that turned out. I already covered it here.

The most plausible from a solitary cautious optimist, through the different variations, that there's going to be a quiet revolution of academics and other thing that is the one that feels the most plausible bubble right at this moment. Quiet with agile firms.

What if it's not a bubble yet? Other self reconstructing Bridgestone? The llm compatibilism.

One trying to reconstruct and build together once with each new filter list with each block and reconnection of construction. Blocks and discovery's from the connectionist substrate, to the reconfig an return and overlook of the relation of elite and popular, and the return to a natural duty.

When that comes, it's a matter to reunite and see which from the commodified community's that are made, it's the populist de-emergence of the matter of the integration of society.

So as a left accerationist it's going to be this meme

Back to the equilibrium, from a synthesis of many and one.

What foxkey is claiming there's an illogical bubble? Idk.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/the-all-or-nothing-vibe-shifts-of-the-ai-industry.html
Oh, blame the Hypers too. Good, bad. or not, Archive version

Conclude @pojmasta done his work,