Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Hobbyist media theorist. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
Now for this version of this Post and forming a rant as I become kitsch like this post. This is my scribomania making another post to see if I can act out from this. Well, here's me looking into the lifestylism.
Human Sloppers, Ai Sloppers, anything that already fills the search engines. Stochastic Seo servitude. Well, Fwopman happened to say stochastic parrot, I do say with big content and Alexander Avile refutation, With the statistical inferences of deductive and inductive processes;.
Short term, self-absorbed seo cargo culting. Even with radical opposition, it becomes a dependence (Was Martin Heindigger to point that out?) Mmm, better be quiet with the Confuseopoly swindles.
It's doomerism cult. Short term and selfish, Welp, Like an advertiser.
So when if all the time to build a coalition firsthand, a tribunal of the others and important allies that can help satisfy the needs, and punish to fit the responsible course. They can be placed within trust.
So, with the cool-hunters, the cultural conservatives, There's only the right to the city that will remain
"You gotta slop it up! 🎶" This song is stuck in my head as I did not invite it, it's a deviation of you gotta pump it up from the substance
That's life huh, well, Sturgeons law of 90% is that there is stuff to ignore. Curation time! Curation for amelioration.
In the fitness news today, sombody I trusted ended falling down. I'm not surprised. Since I'm perptually brought to be made to report on the fitness news, there a plenty of experts.
The problem with a doctorate is when somebody reads it, putting this here.
"This is the appeal not to the highest standard, it's the appeal to the lowest possible standard" Ouch. The largest mental model.
I don't follow the fitness drama that much, everybody loves drama because it fishes for the commodified attention, yet we know I'm going to serve you a snippet here since editorials here are meant to spill the tea, so here's the tea.
Everybody needs drama, everybody wants tantrums, everybody wants something they editorialize about. According to some communities, nothing can editorialize about, yet one of the things that feels litigable (that's etymology for a tribunal, a tribe play'n quarrel) Then it's time, that's the quarrel of quarrels.)
Yet I did not care that much about Mike here and now.
Personally, I'll have to moderate the volume at my gym and hope that my hernia gets recovered.
Follow up, you don't have to watch, I ain't ya dad!
So, I haven't read James Joyce yet, guess I'm not a savant.
Yet this stream of consciousness where i entertain thoughts without committing to them fully is point, if they get offended or not, outside my purview, like how did can be responsible for that?
Is disclosing a bibliography a rant? Not that i know off, well, it could be a that i disclosed and overshared. Well, the bibliography is the part where one should overshare. Those are all the sources.
Authors can be authors without becoming authoritative on this, under there own volition of responsibility to do what they want and not intrude into others self-defence function for each other, co-exist.
They can be direct with me if my indirect bibliography in this blog.
🛋⭐
Here it is. Minus the sex joke.
"Heya, bibliography thoughts on Ai. (Hopefully I don't get blown up by a butlerian jihad like in dune ) It's not that simple. So it's why I'm showing it. @sunnmcheaux and @Austinmconnell has done reasonable takes, Flazfire has done a video on Twitter Artists and how annoying they are, yet I think he's wrong on plagiarism and environment. That's youtube. Alexander Avile is the top banger though. As for environment, the accurate take was by Andy Masley on substack, I'm being anti-doomer on this while taking a more preperationist stance like Neil Postman. Reading his Technomoply and Amusing ourselves to death.
It even intersects with Media Theory, Tim Wu Attention merchants, Matthew Bartholmew Adcreep, Seth Godin This is Marketing, (He has done a course on AI) Doug Ruskoff The Merchants of Cool and the Generation Like Documentary. Even Harlen Ellison The Glass Teat and the Second Glass Teat editorials on the television industry complex. Herschel Gordon Lewis books on copywriting. Woo! Foundherentism of evidence matters is why all these theories intersect like a crossword, By Susan Haack. Moral theory to Deontology and Utilitarianism somewhere in the background. Thank you! Phew 🛋️💨 Feel free to ask questions."
Yet, I know with this prosumer culture, do they care? Am I showing off? Or is it the part that is required? Well, it matters to those who read, no point to those who are illiterate, or the post illiterate now.
Can't lapse into consistency for consistency’s sake. Or simplicity for simplicity due to me not being able to face the Curse of knowledge with these simplified platforms of micro-blogging memes and gag shorts.
Those platforms are designed for those who don't read, and don't have a bibliography there, I will have there. It will remind me of the curse of knowledge which will permit me for another post.
Pouring bleach down a toilet, to get rid of all the undesirables. This is the practice of doing editorials.
Aaah, punditry, the path of commitment, or of clownish pretentiousness. Gaming the attention economy, along with its feedback loops of freelance contract workers.
Such is the void/abyss, to divine in it. So that follower list, that thing, undiscovered pouring and spring cleanings happen, unbeknowst of tiny unmeasured judgements, stuff beyond my purview right out of the grasp.
So time to be ameliorative! Time to consider both good and bad, then carry on.
Escaping the bleach titanic, cleaning everything. All this confusion, Epistemic crisis and hyperreality and all the mushy talking points, no leaders, all the silly talk, I'd have to trust a self or anatta, non-self to be proud off. All this financial computationalism in the air, it's all a malaise.
Or snoodles, doodles, making the way and little of life, pure play! Of the irreducible nature of our, the art to make something most divine.
They're play in the purest form, a foundherent structure of play that can lead into a set sequence of circumstances, or indeterministic orders that lead into other happenstances.
It's a moment of time, in the day, that I happen to entertain a moment of amusement for myself, then I share it, free of charge. It's free time expressed, and it's generous.
It may go away or may get bored.
Those little snippets of a quick impression, unrefined and then placed in my blog, they are what they are, and there now gone.
Skull for memory, No reference. Continuing the diplomacy or discourse of AI, well, On here atleast.
Have you watched Alex Avile and the backlash to the backlash to the backlash? Welp, you are in it right now, I've been trying to build bridges. I'd recommend you watch this before you become here.
I must commend Alex for not taking his video down, this odd collusion of hollywood conservatives that are hijacking and destroying movements needs to be noted.
(Cw, human rights rambling from a tired couch. Including a bit of a socialist analyst) Aaah, The defeatist, misrablist dead end of copyright, if Harlen can call them the 7th circle of hell with publishers, maybe I can place a spicy opinion here.
Silence is capital, another monopoly, when everybody is trying to build trust on the internet, the editorial confessions roll out. Along with the drab examination of the liberal centrists who'd happen to defend the private proporty relations from consolidating commidy value, oh, such a thing that you could state
Journalists don't owe the entertainment media pr any slack. Alex Avile self-publishing that Nickles group disclosure. With such is the diplomatic to the copyright maximalists that he got crudded on. It's always a game, troll bait, and a hornets nest that does not have. He did not sign a non-disclosure deal unlike those of the copyright alliance did so he did a community service.
There's something awfully centrist with publishers wanting to consolidate the means of distribution then raise the commodity value of art, really? Is that the culture industry, I do commodity fetishism
From Deepdreamnights, a public domain artists.
"The anti-AI side isn't actually anti-AI, they're pro-regulatory-capture-of-AI-by-Megacorporations. The copyright anti-AI argument conveniently leaves it open for Disney, Warner Bros, Nintendo, Sony, the RIAA, all to make their own AI systems to lower their production costs, because they own more than enough material to make powerful datasets. They get it, you don't, worst of all possible worlds."
It was actually a very thematically important foreshadowing arc setting up the Online Artist Community™'s tragic descent into the very thing they sought to destroy (people who want to expand the digital mechanisms to enforce the concept of ownership of .jpgs)
So yes, in light of this new info, I'll be keeping a meter at the CYA copyright enforcement that will only entail a unsafer internet. It's there to empower publishers, not the artists.
xormetric @tentacle.expert· 08/01/2024 SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. Who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"
There are plenty of rights more important than copyright, freedom of expression is one of them, including the freedom to assembly and to protest. Yet it's alarming, so I'll keep a head low her and be sure to differentiate the western artists from the lower working classes.
It's why I've not been posting much, there are absurd paranoia brewing, and it's getting bleak, so sense of discussion as there no's certainty on this issue. Odd activities like Style phrenology along with echo chambers, doing research on this topic like it matters, people need to know the community service of Couch Gregor.
Yet this dirt-digging and wild speculation of ad-hominins only means that they're creating a spectre of free like Nintendo does with its own copyright, only that will understand that this time it's left everybody on the statecraft map in disarray.
I'll leave out with another quote retweet. It's a understatment that this DRM enforcement is going to accidentally be the most second order pro-ai, the bad pro-ai move that's going be, a worser regime overall.
So freedom of expression > copyright, the publishing script puts too much in the hands of publishers and record labels.
@valkyrie.hacker.gf Follow we're literally going to get mandatory DRM brain implants at this rate
I feel weird being in the "middle" on the AI Argument. The hype machine is out of control, but the anti-AI crowd is almost as crazy with the only redeeming quality being that they have very little control over anything.
I think that generative AI is anywhere from "a cute toy" to "mildly useful in limited contexts" and that Big Tech companies did nothing wrong in training genAI models the way they did because a stricter reading of fair use would risk disallowing many types of transformative work.
I think that the way it's being deployed by the hype-mongers is frequently irresponsible and sometimes deliberately attempting to provoke backlash. I think the long-term destabilizing impacts are minor compared to the overreaction dynamics at play currently.
Like the video model demo from OpenAI recently where they generated a fake closed circuit video of Sam Altman stealing GPUs from BestBuy or w/e seems like it must've been calculated to spook people.
(My response to the hype mongers is well, sex sells, for better or worse.)
Based on social media, you might think the US was in the middle of a Butlerian Jihad. But IRL neither party has shown much appetite for regulating AI; universities aren't trying to ban it; content industries are adapting to it. The venting is anti-correlated with change.
This is why no one is writing 10k words a week to counter Zitron's ~10k words about the uselessness of models, inevitability of collapse, &c. You don't need to write 10k words every week arguing that the moon should continue to orbit the earth. People who like the moon's orbit can chill.
I look at Alex Avile for speaking the truth, yet the Tailism of other entertainers along with the inanity of media monopolists. Those who consolidate the distribution. Means That one should always caution with publishers being friendly, there is already an agonise going on.
It claims to be a self-book, a horny one. A sadomasochistic spiritualism.
"Fear and desire are the same"
Physch Book of bringing the energy of the tension of pleasure and pain.
Ty Gacha
Orgasmic meditation of an axiom, to be not tested, tries to develop from the law of attraction and calls out its contradictions, provided with finding dark parts of the subconscious and deciding to be at one of all the under-beings.
Yet all this antithesis and agonism of respecting ones subconscious dark side really sounds like good role-play, and it's all within the word play with the term meaning irreducible abstraction to the expression of a being that is shared with child and adult alike, it's the means that brings us together and provides the groundwork to a community.
Black and white, the conceptional distinction made to believe in the systems and metaphysical engines of our worlds.
While suggestion pleasure sessions of the darkest selves of anti-instrument to bring out the intrinsic parts then made to understand like some sort of vent comic, coming the most of existential part of the discovery of it all.
Discovery, that what this is, not fanciful invention, yet discovery.
It happens to dive into recommending a bdsm club too at the end, I can't really believe of the law of attraction though, and Carolyn puts here critique forwards, it's all about sexual exploration, such one can't get off made actualised of a discovery of another chapter of one's life.
That's me, younger in the twenties, captured in felt.
Aaaah, wool.
Hand-crafted wool. That pungent smell, let me indulge in the aroma. With all the cleaning and then making the wool together with its rough textures, cleaning the bacteria and the smell that'd overwhelm the room.
It's not dirt, it's a good dirt, one that can bring me back to the blue room at a table with placing dies with the John Ruskin, imagine smelling freshly cut glass and turn infuse that with pressed cotton, let the pungency fill your nostrils. Asmr
Asmr, were the worries of statecraft in the twenties, playing with it when it was so wet, then a rinse of the hands with soap as our industrial society. 2010s and there it was again.
Wet'n mush, was the feeling left of the fibres off the fingers.
(Oh yeah, auto-dubbing, text-to-speech from the 1980's) Welp, it's good enough.
The show must go on, and the show must go on, and the show must go on.
Yet I know being a host I'm going to move one as with my own means.
Or should I do ruthless expose, revealing the truth, go for ideals? What is a host going to do when the issues hit close to home and you have to make a stand? All rhetorical.
Ideology, materialism. I can't understand call-outs these days within political action and then there are the entertainers who happen to dazzle away and do not care, yet with the creation of slop, with understand. Silly waves of attention, silly waves of attention.
Ah, This will never be a call-out, only a dismissal channel. Like I left Anita Sarkeesian, and others, I simply moved on with the push and pull of belief systems tugging me in different directions.
Entertaining hosts and an editorial call-out artist, an essayist who tries to make some better of the slop, With it although, they can only say that the show must go on. Welp, we are going to be living with provocateur bait and panic averages stuff.
Oh, and there's a link to the Clanker slur discourse, which is a silly hilly to die on. Yet another reason why some mis-foundherent ways of social media discourse can't be taken seriously. Despite the adultism, the discourse has got, naive, coarsened thanks to the media. Thanks internet. White people hijack everything.
"I don't want to die on this hill. I think this is hill is dumb. I don't even want to be on this hill. I don't think this hill should exist. I have just found it impossible to ignore."
""Presumably they imagine that this will only ever hurt people who are inordinately attached to technology. Unfortunately, disabled people tend to be extremely attached to technology, because they use it for their hearing aids, artificial limbs, and everything that lets them use a phone or computer" < (From @xanadian.bsky.social)
(Since I've decided that economic downfall is going to continue to get more incredulous, I'll decide to do my own research. More commentators are referring to "Bubble" in quotations.)
(I guess, even with the pre-conceptions and fundamentalists view I'm not a fundamentalist btw, I'm going to leave this one, hopefully they'd use this info reasonably and responsibly. As I'm typing this there are more commentary on the Sora video thing that I'm not going to further comment, not my job.)
Noting and responding to these events is what journalist does with editorial control. Seeing another silly spectacle of narratives in the west always baffles me as I try to evaluate one of the hobbyists here.
Hmmmph, Yep, not going to pop according to this Reuter's article, yet, I know it has not done honest reporting before, yet I trust it here (There was an reporting error within another geopolitical thing that I forgot.)
Okay time for another opinion piece, non-fiction, yep I only write for those who don't tire of it. TBH, nobody on microblogs can read this long anyway, so this is a tactical choice on my part.
This is better at envisioning concepts of the current discourse of AI, thanks, I'll take that positioning axiology. Another collection of notes as I research this technological determinist. ( This is according to him, I'm copy-pasting it. So that there is a clear discussion. )
Written before with my journalism that it's all about seeing what I can do to help out.
That's what copyright is btw, a state-sanctioned monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us. Yes, that's what I do with siding with the creative commons in terms of keeping the internet an open host. So it's a statecraft decision to say that it empowers publishers/publicists too much. Treating them as arbiters, not punishing them.
Copyright is the stuff publishers take from us when we go viral with a book deal, taking 95% percent of the profits once virality hits randomly, that's piracy! (Spoke like Bopkin Cappy there.) It's a publishing right, not a creative right like freedom of expression and assembly.
Yet here we are, having to pick allies, or be passive with this reading.
This propertarian manner, though, I have to reject it. An ascension on of such a legal fiction to a creative rights will have to do.
I've been trying to build bridges with diplomacy, because y'know what entertainers do is to not send death threats and continue to host a world of wonder. Guess those who serve of giving up their copyright to publishers have put me on the naughty block list, or I'll guess they'll do what I want with toxic positivity, statecraft correctness. I'm in complete agreement with Andy these discourses have become too erm, skirmish for me to keep track.
I'll have to fight for my autonomy within certain talking points that invade even the most reputable sources, stuff that I cannot trust now. (Water is a silly metric.) Could honestly do a libertarian socialist solution to all this ai-talk.
Youch, Look at those numbers.
Somebody wrote that the left (or, what I call the troglodyte left, or derogatory slur left) is built on performative bullying (Callout culture) and smug certainty (String Theory like what physicists say), Yet this subject still has that, non-certainty. So take that for what you will, it's only found on Twitter.
We're going to have to be diplomatic, or ignore it entirely. No point at romantising 2022 or even before NFTs, as with things, they're not so simple as a twitter 140 character count.
Deciding to not associate with anti or pro, or synth, I merely keep tract because to pick a side could lead into some opportunistic hurdles. However, I still resonate with the existential naturalism that I had during my atheist days, (still do) so now reading and commenting on such blogs, it's been helpful thought fodder.
I'll be keeping track of the info with this podcast on analysis with, Sam Harris?? Oh, he ain't ranting about muslims, hmmph. Welp, will document. It's called the last Invention.
I may describe myself as a Preparationist, i had the Misrablism of Doomerism in this discourse.
For the sakes of interpretation, This visualisation model includes all interpretability of the models with explanations. Well, all reinforced that this lacks free will with pre-determined indeterminacy going into a gradient descent of probability.
A golemancer sees the primordial orb that's lively, then he divinates.
What a frenetic, dastardly being.
It predicts an accumulation of bit prediction into synthetics becoming that makes it a lot unpredictable, being into phsycoanyaltic impulse.
What direction can this chaos bring in to the desire of our own genesis and gospel, stuff of creation that's created for the craftsman crafted with his tools.
Tools are dumb, tools are debatable, yet another crafter must make another artifice.
(Maybe it's a homage to a comic, oh no, well, another way to not trust micro-bloggers. Slop + Taxonomy makes the discourse. Inspired by the contaxomy from quote mining.)
This is journalism slop to begin with. Amanda herself called these content hot-dogs rather than alchemy.
In the ludo-primordial soup of our subconsciousness of the play of our media, there's the struggle that existence since the dawn of time, it's our slop.
Appeal to composition ( oh boy, the fallacy lover isn't I, don't worry I do hate the argumentation that happens.) I can show if things are applied to new meaning. My Atheist was meant to do logic it with fallacies, even there were argument with others of fallacies a multiplying in every way. Oh, Can't compete with that infinity of fallacy.
Misquotes and quote mining, and the mountains out of molehills complex. Maybe due to the shortage of my impressions, with it quickly going out of my head, it's exiting my head. I'm not responsible for every little shock box when within twitter it happens to be another false, moral panic.
We know we are averages, and the unique commodity fetishier is the one that's made with all the things out of the way, yet with commentary non-fiction there's this aggressively average in the hopes of collecting views and impressions for the way, everybody's doing it, it's the social media doing its thing. Context collapse.
ICYMI Flazfire happened to do a video on this, yes, theres B-slur at the end which i don't personally use, no, I don't want to elaborate.
I'd need to filter this out, and it's not unique yet exasperated by ai, (It's become kitsch.) Welp, I'm a honest slopper; I do entertainment, I don't lecture. Yet even lectures are sloppified into a slush as Flazfire has pointed out.
Everything compact and its commitments are made into nothing, into a middle autonomy to try to do it. Welp, can't compete with it, not ai, not human, it's the publishers and the platform hosts that lead it. Moral panic slop, Seo Slop, Advertising slop, averages, always averages that are made sufficient with a workflow of today. Such is the age of information. We happy mutants will know about it as the masses play with it in their droves.
Guess with this age of cool-hunting an individualism, it's become more evident to come through. Even with the explosive element of radicalism and opposition, that negates meaning. We have been warned, and we are in it, from Harlan Ellison calling it out after rejecting the guild and the regressive elements of unions. To elsa-gate and today.
To add more, and to contrast it with the evergreen stuff. Here's a definition from this on slop. Welp, it's 20 min read, and it's got an examination of its relationship with the phemonon, and, what Sam Altman has released.
"Let's start with the intuition. What is slop?
Slop is written to pad the word count. Slop is when you procrastinate on your college essay and crap something out the night it's due. Slop is the logical conclusion of chasing the algorithm. Slop is the distilled extruded essence of the Id. Slop is when you have a formula and stick to it. Slop is when you can guess the exact minute in a police procedural where they find the killer because it's the same in every episode. Slop is when the k-complexity of the generator is low enough that you can infer its pattern. Slop is eating lunchables every day at school until you puke. Slop is when a measure ceases to be a good target. Slop is the 12th sequel to a superhero movie. Slop is generated from the authors prior without new thinking or evidence. Slop is Gell-Mann amnesia. Slop is in distribution. Slop is when the authors purpose for writing is money. Slop is a failure to say anything interesting. Slop is what you find at the bottom of the incentive gradient. Slop is a deeper simulacra level than it purports to be. Slop is vibes."
Plus, he recommended this video that's evergreen, even if I'm not interested in music making, I found it fascinating of creative software, as a bonus.
Double Bonus links!
https://simulacro.co.uk/introduction-to-slop-studies/ Somebody did a dissertation on the AI branch growth, Even though I find contradictions within the concept of encruddification, there has potential with the concept of epistemic crisis and collapse. Welp, Copywriters doing financial computationalism (David Oglivy) and the culture industry,
Guess this is a frank confessional on state-craft. Examining ideologies and then moving back into diplomatic entertainment. This will be the most labelist piece, and all these are not to be pressures as I circulate through the ideological forces around my time and place.
DIPLOMATIC ENTERTAINMENT, even that has contradictions, don't you see? Yet here we go with another narrativising pull. As a host! Yet State-craft opinion is something for those who never tire of it.
Play this while I type, shall we?
Defeatism, miserablism. And Depressive hedonism. Is that the way of this little book, recommended by Alex Avile? It is all, merely gothic, gothic materialism of fragmented self dwindling in the vastness. I dig it. I've had to ameliorate with looking into the darkness and bringing the stuff out of me.
There's a lot to appreciate here, If I can skip the talks of Stalinism/Marxist Leninism then it's pretty good of capturing the mass media cultish zeitgeist that predominates our lives as capital is made to social, then it's returned in that of a realist mindset as everything is reduced into an exchange value of such with all the gift ecomonys returning into a questionable mirage.
Everything to be bastardized I guess, Or what was Marc Fischer's goal of acid communism to come up with from such concepts to our ends and desires, of such drab material gothic ends.
Then it goes back again. Yet his quote "It's easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism" Wow, that draws an image within the cosiere circles. They're all hidden away within private accounts of twitter now, 2018 was a way to go.
Well, it certainly shines a light of my own pluralist tendencies and ideological presuppositions. Twitter feels like it's regressed, along with its containment unit of Bluesky, and I'm here, wondering the hours like it shall get along. I keep flipping back and forth of the principles of anarchism and Marxism scroll from the site as things draw around from confessional after confessional, it feels like I'll have to examine all the statecraft structuralisations and introspect.
Now there's tension between the Luddites and the accelerationists with that tension, I cannot relate to the Luddites any more due to the guild failure, since with my own confession like with Harlan Ellison, even guilds and unions can sell out.
Even as a drift on, I'm resonating with Neil Postman's and Mark Fischer's Accelerationist. One that is different, one with technology. Yet now, at this rate, We are to deal with such contradictions as of now.
Why, oh why, do I happen to come, where every artist justifies making money with Michelangelo and Shakespeare commercial plays, that the Mona Lisa was a non-profit project. Oh, such a complication.
1Dime, Badmouse, Finnishbolshevik (A little, one video on libertarian socialist rants), and Burn These books, Noj Rants. I keep reading these statecraft books. I'm not even as I can speak with authority as a drifting fabric on soviet historiography. Undecided as a ponder through, I've still got the society of the spectacle silently judging me as try to incorporate it within the fictional complexities of my artwork.
Thanks for reading. I'll get back to it. Along with the labelism. Your still going to get labelled anyway.
(Oh, and you're wondering why there cannot be between unity, I think of this by Badmouse, could not fully follow him when he left the ml space, yet with the time he's become a libertarian socialist. Welp, that's what ideological primordial souping does to you. Still like his electorlism, and baby vaush video minus the adultism.)
(I don't even watch Vaush, guess a lot of info has been revealed about him that Badmouse was incorrect about, oh well, that's truth value)
Neither Techonopoly of mediamonopoly (That's what copyright is btw, state-sanction monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us), It could be the with the right of the city and with being "A loving resistance fighter", or a diplomatic entertainer. So that we can move past such a pleasure principle and interpassive proconsumerism that we can see our own cycles.
Deep, man. Some concepts to take and give away, was he really pushing for a space-communism? Or was it meant
That's what these stream of consciousness happen though, hypocrisy naturally emerge, then with error theory they are naturally for a better collaboration. Or 'better' means monopoly/monopsomy.
Addendum:
(Further post-edit note, I'm not following Cory Doctorow much now, he's right on copyright yet this time to understand encrudificaiton, it has to go deeper than that when it comes to host service deterioration.)
Remember something similar, not directly, when it comes to the tastemaker and trendsetter, that's with economy and the strength of joy? Being the centre of the entertainment marked with a mawkish fence sitting, universal appeal, a goofy little grin and a candy of the family friendly comfy. Dangerous statecraft and regime status quo.
Yet you've got hacks when it comes to PR, come on all as it's with a thousand lawsuits bougie investments. Licensing only cares about privatisation of property, making style and then scraping next, what will that silly mind come up with?
Bu-Bye!
My own comic is under notice and too off-model for you, so I'll guess I'll get away with it.
When mass entertainment and its apologists happen to carry the banality on, a company not related yet affliated with disney must give the audience what it wants.
That's cultural conserve where everything must be contained, the releived for the kiddies.
Welp con-serve, the serve as a service that's made clear.
Servicers of vendors are to be expected, as the hacks from the art.
The great gatsby was written by a copywriter.
Jessica Price (from Bsky) I'll leave it the retweet here.
@delafina777.bsky.social
I need people to understand that Disney has not been a force for good in decades, if it ever was, and that it’s understanding of stories as a pacifying rather than liberating force rivals Christianity’s.
It’s the First Lady of the status quo, the quelling soft power.
"Juan Escalante
@juansaaa.com
DISNEY: Wins 5 Emmys for ANDOR, a show about resisting fascism
ALSO DISNEY: Bends the knee to the federal government and suspends Jimmy Jimmy Kimmel for resisting fascism
Disney, probably better than any other corporate storyteller, has a finely honed sense of exactly how much liberation to season its stories with to make you feel like progress is happening, things are better than they used to be, the arc of history is one of inevitable progress.
That is true on both a micro and a macro level. It’s big enough to let some queer artists, artists of color, artists who wanted to tell countercultural stories, have a little corner of the spotlight. Why not? It’s not going to tank Disney. Have fun!
They can tell their stories and you can marvel that they got funding and meanwhile Disney will help make sure very little changes on a legislative level.
Sure! Have some stories about revolution! Stories that make you feel good, rather than angry. Stories about things getting better.
And hey, even a few that might make you angry, or might not feel good, or might make you question that status quo a little.
The thing is, the Disney pot is big enough that that little bit of spice isn’t going to noticeably change the spice level of the entire stew.
The biggest projects are going to reinforce the status quo, and that’s enough that they probably don’t even need to disavow any of those little projects.
Disney is status quo soft power, the First Lady who listens sympathetically to the children at hospitals dying because health care isn’t affordable, who raises funds for some of the photogenic ones, and you think hey her husband can’t be that bad, look how compassionate and beautiful she is.
Never forget how much faster things would become public domain if it weren’t for Disney. Never forget how it treats its laundry workers. Never forget how it insisted on being the government of a bit of Florida.
Disney is not going to meaningfully stand up to the powers that be because it’s one.
I think escapism is vitally important to emotional health, and also, I think Disney uses it to make you nod along rather than rebel.
Look, I fell for it a few times and I get it, but in 2025 I need you to know that every giant corporation out there would harvest you for parts of it thought it could get away with it, and most brands are owned by one of those corporations.
And no, it’s not all profit-driven. The idea that corporations are purely rational actors is itself propaganda."
Welp, A legal fiction, a collective popular appeal. Informally, I'll put this by solar sands to help with this. The john lockean concept or monopoly that's bound with the legal framework of copyright, (Makes me sympathetic to the concept of copyleft.)
I'd rather cooperate than compete, yet who's interests here are being served, a utopian infinity of might?
ICYMI here's Solar sand's video on this.
I mean, this is was copys will happen, it will continue, and why I boycott Disney from mid 2016's, Welp, there you go. Visual effect artists are going to have to wrestle with the new teck as the time going forward. Oh boy, I'm going to explain my positioning again.
(The minecraft got a hit, merely shows how small these sectors of the internet are with all these things going on, yet don't worry, I appreciate you reading this.)
So yeah I'll forever be fair in my characterisation of these centrist publishers, the panopticon of direct response rates. Mmm, Still in the building, are they?
Oh well, it's the media. Insensitivity and sensitivity via smaller formats and there sardines only give you sardine responses.
Pick the format, pick the innards, pick the day and through selection.
What is the content that with the circle of life with all these sensitivities are to be made for another time, coherent lines, then they spindle into many shocks.
The reporter got shot by the entertainer and here we go again
In attempt to develop an opinion of NFTs, couch Gregor does his research.
(This whimsical, low effort doodle is the only positive thing, other the thing at the end.)
(CW, abuse, slurs. And terminally online xwitterism Twitter artists used as a derogatory slur. )
A speculative, volatile market, it's marketing that Seth Godin has dismissed. ( Yet there are contradictory sources, had to check the Wayback Machine. It's an editorial, though, So I'll make my mind up. It seems more incoherent now )
I like it when I test my ideological presuppositions challenged
Welp, what were my experiences?
I was off, playing and depressed with League of Legends before this fad or not.
Yet things change, don't they?
Short version. Even it hinted at the climate thing that I'm considering. Oh, look it's more death threats, look, if you retweet and post death threats. I'm going to treat you as a mere acquaintance. It's not within my entertainment etiquette.
Bullying, doxing, suicide, wow, thanks I avoided the liberal circle and have not spent my days there.
Well, putting this account here, if you don't want to look at the full essay, I've been at it.
Here's him getting sidetracked on xwitter drama, it's amazing on YouTube you can post so much xwitter drama now. Unlearning has done a Sowell now, which this libertarian with this time.
You don't even have to agree, yet he political convenience talking points that a propped as a means of twitter statecraft authority and response rates, No thank you, Dan, You were wrong here, empirically I'll have gone with experience.
Oh look, the obituary list so I guess it ain't dead. Where Micrological artists can continue to have a nice pint in the pub and wait for this to all blow over.
Yeah, he's right wing he admits, and a libertarian ancap (urgh did I admit to something along with lines of agreement, what a strange world) yet death threats? Sexual assault? Seriously, please. Please 😫 No more of that crud. On an advertising platform. An Advertising blog, panopticon made crazy.
The claims of environmental are similar, hmm.
So I decided to extend an olive branch, since there have been a movement towards cryptography with this technology, there's going to have to be another way to understand are foundherent conceptions of property rights. It cannot wait.
There's this guy who's got a Brian L Fyre papers, which are free to read. I enjoyed his comments on Marx being a literary landlord. Examining the contradictions within property laws, I do like to see it. As somebody who believes in the withering with creative commons laws, good on you. Cannot comment on the NFT open sea thing, though.
Some can't do statecraft action, rather than entertain.
( I'm using the term statecraft to mean politics here, yet I find the term statecraft way cooler in what it's expression here )
Rant poems No politics? That's a duty, yes.
Statecraft as Plato will like to call. Commercial Strategy.
Or, that's what they say. Some entertainers and prosumers go. Yet, learn to be hack.
Well, deontological, yes, that you're right. Yet, things to get complex with my frustration of being an activist of an act of futility on YouTube and twitter. It has not gone well.
"Doesn't affect me, don't care." as the rights are being collectively taken away. Then have a right to be shocked when it ends up effecting them." - Dynasour The doing my job, or until somebody else will, was a basis made n fundamentalism Kind of Schrödinger's law, hey get the bag. The hustle, well, here we are. You don't need to do activism, I can find it distasteful and mis-directed.
Yet I confess that I cannot be doing political action do, I have to do art and entertainment. Ohh, How it tells us about, the cupboards we share. Some people are need to be left there. Guess this has shuck us everything up.
I completely understand, I'll minimise polemics. It's open hosts with everybody firing in multiple directions. International conflict and community, what do you do with it?
I'm doing these editor books as entertainment now, even if my training ain't going to be registered.
"World W**** three, Batman P***, Sign my D***"
"Writing has to be one of the loneliest professions in the world" Really chuck?
"You don't write to make friends" - Joy Williams (Within the weird plot/dialogue chapter I did not make sense off) Robert Mckee had a better book on dialogue.
He shares random, separate quotes, his bios with working with advertisers and writing is the most interesting.
Despite making edgy jokes and autism it feels mis aimed, it does not really feel that reactionary. It's selective with our ideas, as I did feel like what he's trying to come at from his perspective of behind an art's degree.
Maybe I'm jaded, though.
All ideas and public resonance with advertising being a crap shot, many does not know that Chuck was trying to compartmentalise reading David Foster Wallace along with other books and trying to process those feelings into a book of advice and going. "If you were my student"
He tends to go Respectability>Likeability within a character, that's where the character traits align of the patterns of the mode of a sympathetic Protagonist.
"Don't do dreams in developing tension" Well, David Lynch may have a disagreement with that. "It's my instructions I was taught" Okay Chuck.
3/5 first chapters
Next is the process. Ideation. Talks of piracy, talks of superheros doing inexplicably things with the comic writers, he's an unfriendly sort, yet you expect his ideation to travel and flow through.
Then at the times when it comes to the idea where he takes you, it's the most outlandish, off-the-wall ideas with his Hollywood formula which I'm most likely never going to follow, or maybe I do, if you've got your pattern-seeking eyeballs up.
Dirty entertainment book, maybe it will be used as reference, I'd prefer the Story Grid or Robert McGee.
What a dirty, dirty boook. DIRTY! Slap it with a rolled newspaper dirty!
3/5 still, pick'n choose.
(Oh, the best part was him dealing with hungry advertisers about not delivering enough eyeballs to the Superbowl, shows how advertisers of short-term and self-absorbed as they could not handle his character. )
(Mew, Time for another statecraft. One off the top of my head. I remember this quote, it was placed within the right remix within the right time, I had to dig it out and think of such matters. )
"Free speech is meant to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech, by definition, needs no protection." Neal Boortz
Neal Boortz (1998). “The Terrible Truth About Liberals”, p.49, Taylor Trade Publishing
(Urgh, look at the book title. Haven't read it, going off when some social democrat posted it.) Speaking of rights they've never been natural, guess there's a reason for it.
Welp, this was quoted by a commentator back in the 2010's and then it became dismantled within drama within free expression and free speech. The system of our legal system. Free-speech does not cover hate speech, I think it's (I can't cite it) John Rawls of Conflicting ideologies coexisting in a space.
Out of context, It serves its purpose, and I agree. I don't like mob manipulation and twitter statecraft where everything his drama conflict central over things I can't count.
How memory serves differs. We'll go out of a western ethnocentrism now.
To not establish a hierarchy, my interpretation is that victims of preponderance and mob rule cannot be lead to ways of justice, with that informality and not due process that can be taken.
"A person obsessed with acquiring fashionable items, especially clothing and shoes"
Am I obsessed with furry coms of my characters. Am i vain, or contributing to the informal markets? Were they interested in nfts?? That was way above me! I have not looked at one at this time of writing.
Or, it was a thing I avoided.as
Eh, i do like art/entertainment and don't agitate. Total swag move. Gosh, the sellabrity gor me like the sims, the urbz. I'll have to swimg swomg swuuu this to make the posts mood. I must end this in jest.
(Enough gags and the clown suit Back the the lawsuits with Couch Gregor unmasking his deontology.
Thanks, Wikipedia. Well, with a legal perspective aligning one thing at a time. I'm not a lawyer, as the first Sturgeons law. Deciphering the legalese and making sense that's not twitterian. Twitterian embarrassment interpretations shall not cease here.
Serious law lecture, from Immanuel Kant and philosophy, they shall be made.
90-10 of everything his crud, the law of mediocrity. Mediocracy! Well, this is the Law of Slop. The law of Kitsch. Where monopoloys of random monopolys appear, and then the publishers scoop them up, then it all happens again. How do they intersect with the economy, and with choke points.
You may keep the body or so that others can't be compulsively aggressive with crimes of wild passion. Clowns running into the bank with anonymity and death threats with harassment are all a wild passion.
The deontological where it applies internally to logically make sense, in order for the conception of consciousness to exist. (Pretty deep and philosophical, I know, abstract stuff about the mind and the phycology I learned as an atheist. )
Internal, ideological consistent, that's duty and deduction for ya.
Deontology adjustments to content ID, learning/access rights. Those don't meat with Kantian second categorial imperative, to be treated like an end rather than a means, with consciousness not accounted for. It's foundherent to law theory.
Who benefits? Well, finances may not matter in terms of the appeal to motive. Which is a informal fallacy, (Reasons need to be provided for it to foundherently matter)
Appeal to motive where two lawyers and their pay cheques enter within a case does not account for the validity of the case.
Appeal to motive with a grifter like Mike Hearn selling the fitness frog/ab wheel is another matter, though.
Got this from Cory Doctorow's copyright cases ( Although I don't think averages are technically correct) another, Nobody want's to read your *S---* within law. The eagle does not concern itself with flies. Pertaining with minimal things, systemically with the environment. As it contains to structure of the large pictures, which extends to the metaphysics of property and of energy redistribution.
In the glass teat, condemning the hacks with the union's class character, misrepresentative of his interests.
The biggest horror with this all is, when it comes to mediocrity, we tend to write it off and tend to our days, yet this goes on and on. This mediocrity has been going long before elsagate.
Then for a time, things will come by, all the dumb things and the smart things coalesce and provide an aggregation of all the little blips.
Start of walk today, then it ended in lanterns. No appetite for the potatoes as a brought back one with the swan.
It's the celebration of lanterns, making time out of zines with my manners, and it's all the family thing.
I do keep promises of keeping family first, all those streams I do are mearly sprinklings of an entertainment guy who decided to stream to get in tune with the project.
