play/serious, the book of play

The essay on play/seriousness Fast/slow.

5 stars.

Play

Between Illusion and reality.

To move, and to stand still, Etymologically from the fast and slow.

The slow plot and the fast spectacle. We dance with it. I can see why it inspired my play though. Aristotle as the tension with all the aspects that make our minds dance with the matter of understanding how it constructs our society and civilisation.

This read left me with hope how a concept effects us, infrastructure and urbanism with the products of our capitalism and industrialism has given us many benefits and many liabilities. Advantages and disadvantages. Something in the back of our minds with eudaemonia, quality of life and the cost of living.

Guess that's the narrative mindset, leaving him with respect of our institutions and organisations From dispersion of tension to the creation of it, two poles. Moving us forward.

This is the video that inspired my reading.

Ode to the Meme time

Abstract expressionist bwomph.

 Memeplexs

One thing social media has done, which is nice. Is memes.

The only idea and concept that Richard Dawkins every contributed to our culture, with communal expressions that lead to heuristics of better understanding of civilisation, or more heuristics.

Other ideas, such a study of meme, and the meme machine are better books on this phomonoa imo.

Quibbles, Jreg endorsement, already he may have normalised bad treatments.

Too much glazing of Richard Dawkins, the only one which I liked of the four horseman of the atheism was Daniel Dennet.

Now share along, those transcendent of the Draconian IP laws, spread away and fall through the ideas of all the ways into the art of collage and in the see of the cyberspace.

Swoosh!

The cohort of the beep-boopers.

 Beep boop

I'm a bot

Beep boop

Bot goes beep boop

Beep boop boy, beep boop

beep boop son.

beep boop

Letter of disinterest of Beepity Boop Wars

gambleor said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that Thunderf00t and Pat Condell happen to hold positions which broad brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny."

Principle, as radical ideas that have questionable roots and Polemics.

I apply it to this situation. Similar to the baseless polarizations and the increased amounts of dead-end intellectualisms. They should have bombed a data centre already, yet they are complaining on microblogging. It's

Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them. They are ultimately a non-event.

Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.

Listening and having my beliefs challenged, not by debate, yet by hearing those not of the main-road.

The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started the all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within 

Tesla and Nfts have been telling you of such wild dismissals, and I can read to that and draw it into info and into knowledge. If you've been wilfully misinformed, they are either hustlers or a bad actor. Hustler, there's only so much time to get the information that's sensible, that's not some BuzzFeed article.

Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls Baby Leftism for lack of a better term, (I call it Wilfully misinformed) Has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.

Yes, that's why I've had to moderate my stance on this, focus on broad brushing polemics provided by the perverse incentives of direct response (Things getting more outrageous than they already get)

This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:

• . Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient, It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out.
• Water has been refuted, repeatedly, here we are. Not valid.
• Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
•  Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class petit boug) Yet here we are.
•  Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels Group? weird centrist oppourtunists like Ed Zotron, hello?)
  
  Is this yet another reach via angry straight white men, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism!
  
  
• Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
• . Automation is a matter of capital and in regard to freelancers and firms. Too much epistemic certainty from those who aren't epistemic experts.
• The clanker slur 'discourse' has yet become ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
  
  When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
  
  The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
  
  Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
  
  They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.

Cussy nsfw rant incoming. Befor all of this started, 11 years ago. It's going towards the same trajectory. The bubble on social media is so isolated and that preponderance of response rates aren't like that. Not even a criminologist, there, shooting themselves in the foot.

I must return to the rant since of the small scale bubble of social media ain't reflective of activism at large, since the thing ain't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaption, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.

We will have to foundherently adapt to this epistemic tech, for no epistemological is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaption we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. This second order effects.

So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with properity drm? Misrabalist nihilists with the class action lawsuit, ones of blind faith

When they bring it like this.
Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul Supporters, and Mens right activists, that's my prediction.

If boycotts look like this, then it's going to yet another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.

I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right

Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it.

Peace ✌🛋

When Propriety DRM hits, Moral panic washing.

I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.

... This nsfw gag

Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers. 

Deontological application? If a cost that would not even work? <Article of a chief ecomonist btw.

No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?

Reading this free open university course of criminology

Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?

Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.

(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)

Moral entrepreneur is such a good term 🛋️💭

Reassembled/reinstatement rather than Replaced

 As I try to have an opinion (no opinions allowed on Twitter, artist) of being reassembled rather than replaced.

Two Studys, One of the evidence on Reinstatement. Along with a working paper on Robots and firms I've read. So do entertain better ones before looking at microbloggers and anger there.

(That's the physicalism's way of testing, from literature to textbook. Learned that from bodybuilding.)

Alternative to the populist one that worlds going to end, merely because that elite class, ( Demographically Christian white men in the west, capacity qua capacity) going to control slightly less of it. With its token supporters.

That's one of my theories with labour markets being made anew, deproffesionalize and professionalizing of our cycle.

Here's a materialist/ideology interpretation of the AI with structuralism. As I learn the tenets to apply to my method of understanding the world of qualitive differences. Here's an hour of a book I'm getting. B-B-Bonus video

Plopyright hate post by Bintendo

Hopefully nobody proselytizes with the doctrinaires. All the erotica about is vastly superior to that Business model. Welp,

Worst thing about copyright is reducing all ideologies of art into transacting a monopoly to a publisher, that's not art. That outcome ain't the top of the algorithm of our attention of all the hits (Although I do get it, otherwise it's the fire hose kind of situation.)

Gift economies (that don't exist.) Pro bono work (Professional stuff) and Alternative means of models that don't mean being subservient to reactionary capital. Copyright is the biggest defence of monopoly, so it's necessary that is hides behind it.

Some Bluesky posts I've been collecting..

Retweet
‪@wwahammy.com‬· 3mo
Copyright is the most anti-worker invention ever. It allows companies to demand writers do free work and then decide after the fact whether they want to pay for it.
Lawyer>
‪Meredith Rose‬ ‪@mrose.ink‬· 3mo
COPYRIGHT IS NOT LABOR PROTECTION COPYRIGHT HAS BEEN ABSOLUTE DOG**** AS LABOR PROTECTION FOR THE LAST 400 YEARS PASS LABOR LAWS STOP ASKING COPYRIGHT TO FIX THE WORLD

Oh well, With a Fandom is that it's licensing malpractices with charity and other events, it's not something I'd like to flirt with. This video may sum it up, yet there's the amount of distrust to add to my reason of why am I not a gamer.

There's a continued insistence to enjoy toys and the pleasure principle.

Welp

https://www.suedbynintendo.com/ for all the litigious malpractices

This is what monopoly without anti-trust does to you folks, litigious malpractice.

This has been going for years with such a controversy. From the 1970's of the demonology of copyright. Twenty page document of lectures of the thoughts.

Kim Kardashianifcation

 Short feedback loops

All the time

People doing pin-ups and cuties.

People doing displacement and wanting to be the next sellerbrity

All on a platform for free, 24 hours a day, and the lottery of unpredictability.

Well, shows how small this social media world is within this land of ideas.

When Kim Kardification recommends epistemology, (study of knowledge) (study from a twerk video on tik-tok) What a world.

Richard Williams Disagreement

 "With life drawing, there comes the gradual and fundamental improvement of one's work."

Sadly, that's not how it happens within the marginal cost within the reach of publishers and social media publishing.

Lottery statistics. Numeric
ally, going at random. Random with no-reason. No power scaling of craft, random.

Welp, time for another post.

Excuse-O-Matrix, Beware the Indiscreet, dishonest hustle

 "I wanna just ambulance chase" 

There's something wiggling, crawling, with the anti-work and the workerism of all the stuff within us that's not that a labour that only smallest and viable, yet it's escaping a responsibility to do work to get paid, or exposure that frightens.

Nobody holds everybody to account, since their engagement with these platforms means we are all suspect of them marketers, all there, pushing our buttons for status, for the state, for the status quo, for the status quo ante. 

All a game, all a thing of scarcity and election, all dutifully within the rules of our imaginations.

All the herd mentality, all the herd, that simply IS, not good, not bad. Not controlled, out in the for you tab or the Discovery. That's a algorithm, that's a market. Good or bad, that's advertising, that's propaganda, that's the commercially friendly and that's the education.

Whatever the platonic natural world justifys, whatever the polemisation is brought.

All a blur

Learning the Beep boopitys in academic circles

Beep Boop = Ai For any savvy reader out there, when I talk about it, within my microbloggers, I'm talking about it. I've to keep it low in case random aggro doomers come and nibble at

Since, its become a standstill of recursive doomerist. Ignore the news-headliners of ai being Jailbroken and come with me with my sources on knowing the beepity boopits.

I've mentioned The Last Invention, yet what about Machine Learning street talk?

Lump of cognition fallacy with the latest one here though, even though I enjoyed the definition of intelligence with less is more (Which is supposed to be a paradox btw.)

There, articulating theory's that better there, even the sceptics I felt like I learned something with intelligence being defined right now. Come and seek the new answers with a niche audience of about a bunch of llm/diffusion and creativity that ain't reflective within the bubble of social media.

Because it's ultimately, and most fundamentally inconsequential, those who beg for propriety drm and infinity of copyright trolls.

Guess I'm stuck in the middle again.

Mechanical optimism Dario Amodei, along with Doomerism examined

  Dario Amodei seems to be sick of the doomers, I am too.

Guess with AI visions, I'll leave with a positive note. Machines o
f loving grace

That's the positive aspects of ai. Biological pathogens being sorted along with the ways of lays being rigorously analysed, not seen and a foundation within discourse, only to test theories.

Really gives me hope, even though it's coming through anthropomorphic, well, I can converse now with capital. Big does not necessarily mean bad if it's governed well. We all can't be noble savages.

Greater wrong has written by Doomerism and it's shades, time for emoooooo.

I'm a little ennui frankly, myself. Yet these layers of the onions are the self-described doomers.

Yet the idea of robot overlords getting bored as I skimmed through my the mathematics as entertainment made me interested, yet that tells something more about me than. It's by @jdp.extropian.net What about this, and Intermingling with the LLM engineers now because why not, This is what happens when a journalist does takes and even citizen journalisms.

Can't broad brush all believers at this rate.

Enjoy those links in the doomer examinations, because I'm not clicking em, to confess.

Oh, Fresh Episode of The last invention is here. I'll be putting these under the Beep_boop to show how much editorials I've done on AI. Clambering for certainty with opinions to how to find peace of mind.

I mean, bonus lecture at the risks and assessments of the risks, even the one I've done with psychosis one.

My foundherent philosophy beliefs

Self-portrait time.

My entertainment persona, is only part of being a memoirist. Mesmerism ain't in my cards, Under the veil of fiction there's a man, inspired by Andy Masley.

Consider using this to start my foundherent belief manifest. Part of my memoir series. It's not a fixed epistemology and coined by Susan Haack. Will begin with this framework. Have a peer of my simplistic and limited view of the world, of handling radical difference. From Stereotype to Archetype, and then into Reality comes my vision.

I don't have the expectation of somebody clicking my links, I'm doing it so I can check it out. Along with others.

Almost Complete certainty, Founderhent Belief.

Things I'm going to carry till the end of my lifespan.

• Naturalism exists, (introductory article here.) Since the doctrine means that sciences of physical to the sociological do matter. Contingent and downwards of our rational facilities dependent.
• Moral Desert does not exist, or, Polemics ain't serviceable to an entertainer by definition. Rehab and deterrence prefably as a performer. Not because it's for a living, because the magician loves to conceal and hold attention.
• Personal identity reductionism or the Buddhist (anatta) is reductionist. Radical, or the identity we make, it's constructivism to perform for informal groups. Or the more formal groups officially anointed by the state. The fictions of self we make are great entertainment, though.
  
  It's all into status roles and state within our linguistic make-up within our discoveries circles.
• Political egalitarianism, ideally, everybody rights are respected. Even with the critiques of the Marxist labour of value (the internet is a counter to that.) Well, I'm not a Marxist in the doctrinaire sense, more a sociologist. Since I'm an entertainer, I default to social democracy.
• Epistemological foundherent holism and no fixed fundamentalism, I rest within the distribution of laying along and correcting my beliefs as more convincing evidence comes along. All part of the dialectical within the sociological mesh we exist.
  
  Both Positivism (Quantitive) and antipostivism (Qualitative, Interpretationism.) Leads me into a descriptive, structuralist conclusion. I do like the big picture. A complexity that I embrace and a way away from radicalism.

Pretty sure beliefs, mid-certainty

• Anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron because it requires a state to enforce a monopoly or monopsony. Self-ownership is an absurd concept.
• Value Rationalism and Pluralism, both combined, help liven the discourse within academic circles to help coexist.
• Entertainment secularism from Academic, Law, Journalism, and Education and Religion, While I'm against the Platonic elitism in general, they're a field where more qualified voices count in regard to the scientific method and not fall victim to the race to the bottom of the vulgarisation of entertainment. It may not draw in the crowd as better, we need for better mass communications in regard to these more delicate fields.
  
  Academia and the main road, or what Susan Haack called preposterism where education was befallen to ad creep. Commercial speech ain't the same of any liberal right of freedom of speech and expression. Even if it does not exist at this reactionary capital.
  
  Not everyone is entitled to their opinion/expression, as in walking in a bank in a clown costume there may be, problems. Freedom of speech is a liberal right of non-state intervention, and I don't have an obligation to pay it any respect unless there's litigation. No, I don't have to respect that liberal right of non-state intervention.
  
  Only with the dance of the typographic and televisual states of our mode of production that we can lead towards edification.
• Non-Utilitarianism can lead to a race to the bottom and should be with the deontology governance best interests to moderate it.
• Atheism : Secularism Yet I respect internalism if their rituals do not interfere with the state. Pretty sure god does not presuppose my thoughts. Even with theological naturalism.
• Marxism Karl Marx underpinning of sociology never intended to be having his doctrine written in stone and leave a legacy. Regardless, due to it leading to autonomy such as the stonewall riots, I cannot thank him enough with the labour theory of value. So yeah, he contributed. The state should, within reason, stop the perverse incentives of reactionary capital.
  
  Since with my disagreements with Marx anyway, most Marxists have become Marxists Leninst Maoist, anarcho libertarians, Sociologists and Economists.
  

• Free will compatiblism is needed via the state to hold bad actors accountable for their misdeed, got that one from Daniel Dennet. Along with deontological structure to help organise society to help coexistence. One could say this is my politics.
• Marx was a naturalist with scientific determinism, so scientific realism model.
  Since science is our reality, academia should be able to help inform our public through mass communications to help our hierarchy of insight. Of our communication of plot the spectacle, academia and the main road.
• Licence witherism: The privatisation of property should be resisted, for whatever reason, people should not create an entire industry complex of reasons concerning Platonic natural law. There's a reason why rights are not natural. A handshake deal and a deal is a deal. Pacta a sundra.
  
  Marx was inconsistant with this, So Aaron Swartz goal with the creative commons is to help the Petit Boug (Like me) able to structure entertainment with the productive forces. Enclosure of the commons should be resisted.
  
• The right to the city matters with holding from reactionary capitalism. Since, capitalism has provided us with plenty of benefits, including welfare. One should be acting autonomously, away from those who own the means of publishing and reactionary strains to decommodify with the market metrics being organised.
  
  We can't mutual aid state capacity with cooperatives, though, That's the point where I can't take anarchists seriously.

• Animal cruelty witherism: The meat industry complex is cruel and it should be regulated. Despite my omnivore, a reduction of protein could lead to weight maintenance and a more deontological society.
• I'm a bit iffy on electoralism, rather expressing the right to a protest whenever needed.
  
• Mental/Status Functionalism : We, in a society from the profession and de-professionalise are designed for status role play and seriousness. Everything from the input and out of our wishful intentions and from our workful labour expressed is a manner of interconnectivity that creates our own interactions.
  
  These are ingrained in our structures. From informal groups into a start of our formations.
• Semiotic reductionism rather than a semanticist, not a Saphir Whorf Hypothesis I'd prefer to think visually rather than verbally, although I find great value within literature and the art of the verbal expression. Words do not change how we ontologically behave, all the symbols and the symbols.
  
  That being said, the cartoonist/scriptwriter can do well to know about narratology, patterns of narrative that can lead towards a structural understanding filling the semiotics with. There's only so much praxis that can be accomplished
  
• Experience machine would be a bad time, Brain stimulation reward is a race to the bottom. (Here's the thought experiment)
• I understand the tension of deontology/dialectical materialism, so I may add the capability approach to making Marx compatible, John Rawls had an approach too, ain't touching that. Can't read all literature.
• (Experiment here)P-Zombies aren't real due to the Gradualism of the mind. So it becomes a naturalised
• Moral Realist, Experimental ethics yet with model science can't answer everything, non realism can be entertained though. Still up.
• Structuration of aesthetic value: While subjective outsider art exists. Welfare is meant to help the mid-class with the enhancement of the productive forces. All part of pluralism.
• Gettier justifications being fully complete: That's where true justified complete belief comes in.

Stuff I don't have the foggiest, difficult

• Mathematical realism and non realism : Sure, evidentialism could suggest a discovery of counting, yet such a thing is up in the air.
  
• Qualia: Fascinating area of study, haven't specialised in the theory of mind that much, leave that to psychologists.
• Time Theory. B and A theory. Seems fun! Still a hole in my foundherentist framework.

Boom, that's a life.

This is post is CC BY-ND

A recursive look at links

 Something in direct ways that matter.

Does it all matter?

I don't measure them! What about the numbers? The links on the right? The way I keep talking, the manner and such.

You may be looking at them right now? See that one at the aesthetically deep dives.

You may never click it, ain't that okay? 

Oh, 

Well, nobody clicks on your links when you do an essay or an incoherent essay. Don't be a twitter 'artist' elitist bunch of twerpy pretension.

So act in mass media, for the audience of one, okay?

Do you think they click on YOUR links? Nope! Nada, that's why I don't argue and have my epistemology on microbloggers.

strong vs nuanced opinion paytoilets

Everybody has one, everybody. Can take a dump despite the more academic, more rigorous approaches within this wild ways.

Pay toilet, was the vulgar expression by Harlan Ellison, used to express the spirit of western democracy.

Yes, everybody can do an essay  everybody can do porn, everybody can do a scat. It's what we signed up for. With content moderation being the thing, we govern each other.

So this self-governance is sacred, that's the thing with deontology and rights. Or as the autonomy of the previous days I was taught.

The discreet ones do it at the edges of acceptability. How these resolve of the provocateurs and polemists with the coexistence.

The strong ones draw lines in the sand, in the plane of axiology.

novelty =/= originality

People can be original, and still be insufferable.

Newness and the one an only uniqueness are not the same, Given the progression of time for each. One Direct response (extend) and the cognition (brand).

Newiness, we know the news can be ignored if it ain't emergency room stuff.

The others have gone through the gauntlet of conflicting symbolism, through pundit or cute to the blips of hosts/platforms. Well, professionals that don't attend.

If that the thing is one is first and lucky, then that ain't good enough. The law of diminishing returns takes it toll.

Propaganda is education/from our attention merchants of sex.

 Wow, Formalised instruction one keeps personal, yet unless it's entertainment under the legalese of fiction, there's a more direct approach.

Welp, Since essays are propaganda much like school, here's one on education within the west.

Sex workers (Prostitution) as I agree with most of what this video is on about. Thanks for the public service, and even if the opinions don't align, I know I can endorse the views like this.

Is this what they mean by world W***** three with what Chuck Palunuik wrote with pornagraphers? Like me being on the lower run of the whorearchy with its on social dynamics at play of all the way people seem to not pay attention to this blog, consumer my porn then go about their business? With that legeles of no politics, wanting only entertainment?

Is that it?

Well, rhetorically of course, there's the way I have to address sexcess of those who are discreet about what they enjoy, with their kinks that I have to address, it's like this wild west that I'm going to live in will have to see how others are paying attention.

It's like those kink accounts that post only porn to a marketing efficiency standpoint, yet I'm not optimised, I can't fit in a mold, being an intellectual with many foundherent believes ain't out of his Cascoon yet of discovering that I'm a freak who like with my Marxism.

Oh well, you follow doctrines, your article, and you're done.

W*****-Archy

Sexcess

Sexcess, that people only value me for my sexual performance. (If you ab-test a website enough, it will turn into a porn site.)

There, uncensored the word porn now, I'm done.

I'll keep track of Intellectexual, she may have some ignorant assumptions regarding with how deep I am in the beep boops, yet it will all pass.

essaykin, Our interal yearning for heuristics

No, I won't elaborate on this book reading meme. From Sharonk. Haven't got it.

With our linguistics, Noam Chomsky did his best to acknowledge an internal organising of our labour mechanisms. Patterns into simple and complex ones.

As a general rule, direct response is action. It pierces the consciousness with its heading.

To the tiniest of snippets of knowledge, to the biggest, all within a maxim of wisdom, to the incursion and the curious that's the whole shtick.

Mini snippets! Mini insight

Bowser Detourment Guy Deboard

Bowser, your name sells millions of copies, and the world sees you as their kingpin, irreplaceable!

What will you do, feeling the ways with your infinity of pin-ups, and p*** filling the way with exhibitionism. The pleasure is painful, the priapic and tension of the receptors can't take it.

The way that tingle makes the brains sour, urgh. Headaches and nausea from the tingles, the can't feel it. Absolute Anhedonic.

Anhedonic, that's stuffed full of advertising for entertaining an audience with the same old demanded spectacle.

You are the laughing on trick pony that's keeps going round. You've made it quantitively that brings the all down.

Come Guy Deboard, show me this villain needs another dousing of praise, one that will last to the end of time.

On a discarded lunch box flotsam, on the Blackpool beach. Then, only with cultural hegemony, such is will be. The herd morality persists within it.

Fair Use advocates

Interpretability the first one next-

Since copyright is a state sanctioned monopoly. Non-binding and unenforced. Freelance contract workers and the useful fiction of firms. It's not a platonic natural law.

Fair use advocates are appearing out of the seams. I can only sympathise due to the misinformation of micro bloggers.

The technical term is infringement, not plagiarism, and it ain't a felony. More an embarrassment.

Propriety drm won't solve this. This lawyer questioned the nofakes act, I agree. Thankfully it's not in effect.

"Why you should be worried about the NO FAKES Act:

-Threatens free expression and fair use

-Expands copyright law with broad language and vague definitions

-Harms open-source AI and tech innovation

-Would impact transformative works like fan and remix culture"

https://ccianet.org/articles/the-real-costs-of-the-no-fakes-act/

Welp, wish it the best. The lawyer is getting annoyed with the concept of 'market dilation' I'd say due to long tail there'd be diffuse, and I'm looking into automation from other sources other than the old doctrine of dialectical materialism.

Cartesian Graph questions

 

What if none of this makes any sense?

No control to this in regard to winning any social media lottery.

Reading Liberal theory and all ideological presumptions fixated with brute and simple by design.

Politics is a lot more complicated than a Cartesian graph, there's a Marxist/economics refutation, there's the anarchist refutation, then there's those who do it bully centrists.

Which, what are you going to do?

Then it's used for branding exercise, position, Other than the lottery of the social media.

Such a manner of label and self-actualization, self-determination. Here we have where through the cross, This is where the views of our democracy of many lies.

freedom to choose/freedom to access, License faf

 These are state rights, from the state.

Prefer Freedom To access over the freedom to choose, being to choose to be a naughty publisher with a 95% contract of all labour.

Another victim claimed by the copyright industry complex.

Creative service

Creative service Gabe? Well, I have my thoughts.

Venn diagram of industrial and artisanal modes of production! Marxist doctrine, a go-go.

Industry its stuff of labour and professionalism, and the firms. Right to the artisanal.

Marx, Keysein and the Marginal Austrian one with theory of economic value, scarcity to make a product.

Artist implies creativity of an individual, not a collective (Even if they have style guides and a place and trace.) Thats the industry of arc! Taylorism and Fordism combined to make it with scientific management.

So, The mode of production is required to ascend from hackneyed to creative. Select the factory, select the future.

Industrial hacksmenship, or marginal cost and value vis the artisnship of labour value. (That's the doctrine of Marxism for ya)

Graphic design and Illustrator, industrial, Contemporary art not so much.

There it is again, Commercial and Literary distinction again.

The anti-bootleg eyes of castella

 

If anybody DARES conceive out her propereity domain,

Then she ZAPs them, like the emperor who has such a high status, the subject dies when looking at them.

Her likness in you mind? ZAP.

Her Face? Zooop.
Even the word Cast? Zappers.

Burnt to a crisp, merely like that, a nothingness of not being able to conceive  as she owns the word the and 99% of writers have perished based on here benevolent rule!

You can only pull from thin air, and all ethers as all ideation is contingent to her!

Observe. An idealism within her natural law! Of Golden abundance!

PWOOOOOOOOOSH!

The concepts that don't make it

Unable to reach the finish line of scribeomania, reaching the end.

With the state-sanctioned monopoly looking over, will you ever get the distribution you wanted, the fame you deserve?

Well, not all, all things in the publishing industry that does not pay attention, it is industry, marginal return and so forth.

To the end of all characters of conduct and into the one selector.

From the slush pile, of mediocrity and to the rat race comes what is called.

THE CREATIVE INDUSTRY