Merely relaxing into the rhythm of doing work for me. Already did,
It's yet another trend where a stream of attention for people to pay attention to and to grow a following.
Everybody, what a stream of attention to grow a following towards solvency. I can afford to, with all the amount.
Even when the guy who stated cleared the copyright for the makers to sell their work, It's clear there's social capital involved to help capitalise on the streams of attention again. It's to show a little spot where the SEO lays, and that's it.
You are the product to advertisement product, and the attention economy is ontologically inseparable to the conversion advertisement these platforms support, with the prosumerism intertwined with its structure.
With the reporting on this, Mary Sue seems to do honest reporting. Oh boy, another copyright troll. Of course, into the antipathy brand which has mixed antipathy as a legal concept within legalese. I have mixed feelings of it being a useful fiction.
Posted this meme in reply. Aaaah 🛋️💤
These short-term RFPs for internet traction will always exist, for the long termers who want to be sought out by name, they will always have to ignore it. I forget everybody is in the hunt for the newcomers, and it's target audience.
We are not 100% pure when it comes to these trends, either go in for the self, or the generosity of others. I'll most likely going back into the art-fights, due to the fun'n beauty. Yet self-sustainability is more important than from self-exploitation.
If I contradict myself, only if it's important.
It's a tactic, made to get hold of an audience's attention within these social media sites, it ain't for those who could afford strategy.