Completely abstract expressionist. Aren't we?
As I evolve and adapt my praxis, it comes to mind that advertising, money and its influence remains forever predominant. That's not fatalistic, that's simply acknowledging what advertisers want.
Whats data for? Since advertising takes from the book of electorlism. So to quote.
"Here's a thing: People who analyse social media look at volume of dialogue on a topic to help understand the relative importance of a given thing or event. If you talk about a thing on social media, even to make fun, you are amplifying it's importance, which impacts more than you know.
You want to see less of a thing, don't say anything at all about it. Block it. Ignore it. Mute the words.
"But Bluesky doesn't work off algorithms!" But paid media off Bluesky does. So do investment analysis firms. Advertising campaigns. Market analysis for local big box stores. "This is what people on Bluesky are talking about." "Well, then it must be important!"
You want to see less of a thing, don't say anything at all about it. Block it. Ignore it. Mute the words.
"But Bluesky doesn't work off algorithms!" But paid media off Bluesky does. So do investment analysis firms. Advertising campaigns. Market analysis for local big box stores. "This is what people on Bluesky are talking about." "Well, then it must be important!"
South Bay working marketing teaches Media literacy again. Emphasis on paid media. This is what editorial should know with mass audiences amd there cultivations.
Men in black quote.