A dichotomy between distract and distract.
Yet with all this time, and there's the way the ideas are made. With it that can let somebody learn and aid with new foundherentism, within the mesh of epistemology. Rewritten when things don't fit within the experiential clues, then made.
This is expanding on the theory by Susan Haack, yet theories are the made into praxis and the back into it again. Am I embellishing or growing it? Well, since it's a movement away from religious fundamentalist ontology of religious belief. Guess that's the advantage of agreeing with one thing, and disagreeing with another.
Perfection ain't determined by any editor because there aren't any here. For better or for worse.
Yet news? Anybody can be one now. (Uh oh). Does it direct one's intent or distract it?