Ribofunkionality

Kyro and Gregor hallucinate, side effects after their Golemnfication last for two weeks.

(Kevin Kelly went and adapted the idea of cyberpunk, then the idea went into ribofunk.)

Libidinal charges from golemnolgy could be brought to the divisions of medical tech, assigning a category of new tech, to connect the other innate matter with the neurofibers of their being. These energies are directed through the conduit of new biological norm.

Where glands in the hand of Kyro produce electricity, Couch Gregor's fibres expand and distortion, and with a biological diffusion that is made to a whole of bio hackable matrixes. Wet mesh of manipulatable fibre into new physical beings of physicality.

It connects within, albeit to be altered with gems and power of other ways, and diffused with hexes and tricks that deactivate these soul-bound constructs. Constructed from the souls being a human normalcy. These are the processes that magic interconnects with there dna, they're very being.

From the Happy Mutant's Handbook, Under review.

The literary open question

Henry Moore has the open question argument, I'm going to twist it to see if there's a contradiction within literary/fine art pursuits. I'm not going to address the refutations and endorsements of such a refutation regarding naturalistic arguments, that's going to be an untouched rabbit hole.

There's something where somebody will enter the question of literary that becomes pretentious, when the amount of attention is laid on top of it before. This is only the infinite regress, this is where boundary that happen to be enforced, like a price point or the ending of a book.

It's one way to apply Occam's razor to the extreme end of the spectrum of literary meaning. There are criticisms to the commercial, and criticism to the literary. Redundant literaryism.

Addiction to self-help, Gambling addiciton by design.

Addictions.

Addiction to the Milton Friedman amoralism, to prosumer transaction of a direct response advertiser, such is the world-view to be dismantled within this book.

Where the socioeconomic systemic problems of our culture are to be seen with the prime example of commercial design of the casino. Which is the epicentre of all the mindsets, from financial coercion to the point of self-destruction.

An industry, that grows more mindless as it industrializes. With its cogs of hedonic treadmills of suspension of entirety to the point of gambling, it's self-help suffering the consuming paradox in the later chapters. Self used to climb in the addictions, and self-help to be used to climb out. What a paradox, the only self-help is to not play and gamble.

Youch! The ending goes into this western design philosophy, of what to do with this contempt-enduring science seen from the outsider.

Within this rabbit hole is non-existent, a world of games that is pried open in a fascinating exposé.

How does this reflect social media design, of video game design, and of the way and movement of the corruption of user interface design itself. With the consumerist transaction, the product to sell to shareholders, whatever it takes to stack the gamble in their favour.

Let it be revealed.

A living tautolgy

The commercial game can force a tautology on the creative.

Where the justification of the living can lead to best patterns that work, and not new patterns that don't. The rubber stamp, they do not work on the non-neos. The mediocre average middle.

The neophiliacs though, they are willing to jump aboard away from this tautology. It's a living, it's a living, and it's a living. Circular and unpersuasive, it's up to the finders of the new to seek something else. Such a justification is a work that repeats till the idea runs out, till the notion of all the emptiness of the physical cogs are revealed, to the point of a question. Only the honest heart can answer.

Is this living worth it? Is it important or is it an excuse?

Living is the physical word and it's costs, it explains nothing of the soft, hard to measure skills and intangibles that go into creative work, which should be in the job description of the creative.

The get-rich-quick niche, youtube comment

Tip the angry potion in the youtube bile

Yes, from the comment. There's been a trend or niche of making a living on social media platforms, the reverse engineer niche, the meta growth niche. All nebulous in its very concept.

I'm going to comment on it, reflecting my own streaming schedule on twitch.

"Niche down"

Is this a no-brainer? Well, since the internet is a niche medium, not like mass television. This could be interpreted as a niche up, since variety is hard enough. This is not advice, merely a totalizing system of the internet, it's more observation.

The reason ssniperwolf got so big is because of the mass television experience, how it reflects the non-interventionist platform mindset YouTube has, is that an alternative? Na, the power law curve ensures those that simulate the mass experience can only reach the top. This ambulance chasing incentive will exist.

Being open to multiple nooks and crannies individually, I learned a lot from blender and comicing gags. Still learning more, variety of niches that reflects creativity I guess. Intentionalism to a single viewer is only the nature of the internet.

I guess these grifters are treating is a shortcut, though. Overspecialization in the gym without a base can lead to a sloppy workflow.

Consistency

In the gym (another bodybuilding analogy), it's the baseline importance of accomplishing a general physical preparedness. It's the barest minimum, though.

Sustainability must be discovered BEFORE any of a posting schedule can be attained, Can one have the physical, mental and spiritual reserves before such a matter be obtained? This is going to be a case-by-case basis for each case, short speed may not be answered, agreed. Health comes first.

Be an Expert

This is a social media platform with minimal curation and creditation, there is none. This can be a problem in of itself with it's all that works as trust and attention become ever more priceless commodities. Why does these so-called experts need so many videos and work? Hmm.

A lot of this advice is from other professions from direct response advertising, repackaged and not new. There's meta-videos in the niche that's reasonable, Theo Evans makes no videos for making money, yet his postmodernism adds value, this ain't worth it though. Thanks!

(I don't usually write social media comments, this one is inspired me.)