Bowser Detourment Guy Deboard

Bowser, your name sells millions of copies, and the world sees you as their kingpin, irreplaceable!

What will you do, feeling the ways with your infinity of pin-ups, and p*** filling the way with exhibitionism. The pleasure is painful, the priapic and tension of the receptors can't take it.

The way that tingle makes the brains sour, urgh. Headaches and nausea from the tingles, they can't feel it. Absolute Anhedonic.

Anhedonic, that's stuffed full of advertising for entertaining an audience with the same old, demanded spectacle.

You are the laughing on trick pony that's keeps going round. You've made it quantitively that brings the all down.

Come Guy Deboard, show me this villain needs another dousing of praise, one that will last to the end of time.

On a discarded lunch box flotsam, on the Blackpool beach. Then, only with cultural hegemony, such is will be. The herd morality persists within it.

Fair Use advocates

Interpretability the first one next-

Since copyright is a state sanctioned monopoly. Non-binding and unenforced. Freelance contract workers and the useful fiction of firms. It's not a platonic natural law.

Fair use advocates are appearing out of the seams. I can only sympathise due to the misinformation of micro bloggers.

The technical term is infringement, not plagiarism, and it ain't a felony. More an embarrassment.

Propriety drm won't solve this. This lawyer questioned the nofakes act, I agree. Thankfully it's not in effect.

"Why you should be worried about the NO FAKES Act:

-Threatens free expression and fair use

-Expands copyright law with broad language and vague definitions

-Harms open-source AI and tech innovation

-Would impact transformative works like fan and remix culture"

https://ccianet.org/articles/the-real-costs-of-the-no-fakes-act/

Welp, wish it the best. The lawyer is getting annoyed with the concept of 'market dilation' I'd say due to long tail there'd be diffuse, and I'm looking into automation from other sources other than the old doctrine of dialectical materialism.

Cartesian Graph questions

 

What if none of this makes any sense?

No control to this in regard to winning any social media lottery.

Reading Liberal theory and all ideological presumptions fixated with brute and simple by design.

Politics is a lot more complicated than a Cartesian graph, there's a Marxist/economics refutation, there's the anarchist refutation, then there's those who do it bully centrists.

Which, what are you going to do?

Then it's used for branding exercise, position, Other than the lottery of the social media.

Such a manner of label and self-actualization, self-determination. Here we have where through the cross, This is where the views of our democracy of many lies.

freedom to choose/freedom to access, License faf

 These are state rights, from the state.

Prefer Freedom To access over the freedom to choose, being to choose to be a naughty publisher with a 95% contract of all labour.

Another victim claimed by the copyright industry complex.

Creative service

Creative service Gabe? Well, I have my thoughts.

Venn diagram of industrial and artisanal modes of production! Marxist doctrine, a go-go.

Industry its stuff of labour and professionalism, and the firms. Right to the artisanal.

Marx, Keysein and the Marginal Austrian one with theory of economic value, scarcity to make a product.

Artist implies creativity of an individual, not a collective (Even if they have style guides and a place and trace.) Thats the industry of arc! Taylorism and Fordism combined to make it with scientific management.

So, The mode of production is required to ascend from hackneyed to creative. Select the factory, select the future.

Industrial hacksmenship, or marginal cost and value vis the artisnship of labour value. (That's the doctrine of Marxism for ya)

Graphic design and Illustrator, industrial, Contemporary art not so much.

There it is again, Commercial and Literary distinction again.

The anti-bootleg eyes of castella

 

If anybody DARES conceive out her propereity domain,

Then she ZAPs them, like the emperor who has such a high status, the subject dies when looking at them.

Her likness in you mind? ZAP.

Her Face? Zooop.
Even the word Cast? Zappers.

Burnt to a crisp, merely like that, a nothingness of not being able to conceive  as she owns the word the and 99% of writers have perished based on here benevolent rule!

You can only pull from thin air, and all ethers as all ideation is contingent to her!

Observe. An idealism within her natural law! Of Golden abundance!

PWOOOOOOOOOSH!

The concepts that don't make it

Unable to reach the finish line of scribeomania, reaching the end.

With the state-sanctioned monopoly looking over, will you ever get the distribution you wanted, the fame you deserve?

Well, not all, all things in the publishing industry that does not pay attention, it is industry, marginal return and so forth.

To the end of all characters of conduct and into the one selector.

From the slush pile, of mediocrity and to the rat race comes what is called.

THE CREATIVE INDUSTRY

speed format conclusions

Badmouse said that streamers earning fame ( or infamy symbolic relatable capital ) and money hinders the overall struggle.

I say, yeah as an activist, no as an entertainer. Yet, do these editorials say otherwise, ho ho ho, well, you do encourage me Harlen.

Staying in sync is the most important of all these.

Since streaming is the best take to be able to manage ones one personal space, there's no editing, one clear distinction between editing (non-sync) and unediting (sync).

Leaving a trail, editing along the genealogy of ideas to pluck out moments of consciousness. That is one sense, to bring verisimilitude with the work.

Peter Coffin on licensing, character examination

So I'm going to dive into a excommunicated character. Time to commentary time with my impressions.

Yes, I'm posting this. IDC if you disagree, and you see this as an endorsement. Cussy things asides with all the amounts. Here's he goes with the labour theory of value. 

As with gatekeeping, well, better to gatekeep creative commons rather than copyright doctrinaire. Each vote of that only legitimises the system. (That's an anarchist saying)

I've had to my commentary with Hbomberguy and Innuendo, We may have had differences with the movie such as c*ties with me agreeing with feminists Podcast episode, that's here and there.

Oh and the content, I've simmered on that. It's capitalisms perverse incentives and race to the bottom, really. Any sociological, foundherent analysis yet nobody is calling the obvious thing out to Hbomberguy.

Wow, he's got excommunicated by the copyright doctrinaires! Woopsy. Going to abstain my judgement of the J. K. Rowling thing. Guess he's right to call out the harassment campaign of the liberal apologists of certain issues now left-coded.

(Even when then, Innuendo's This is Phil Fish video has passed in the past. He's doing presentations of thought terminating clichés now. Strongly Agree.)

Commentary channels with this Though over the word content means there's still some hope, along with left unity never being a thing since it's harder to accomplish, that's a good thing. Welp, with my own opinion of the content/format distinction being a non-sequitur.

It's gone south, though, along with Stephanie.

What happens with those full of social media capital of Symbolism and relatability do now? Get Sad and leave, or mad and try to consolidate and control. Have to agree with that.
Yeah, Opinion has lowered.

Oh yeah, I've discovered his position on Ukraine for the moment, and I support their right to self-determination. Frantz Fanon Self-determination. 

Agreement

Gen AI and propriety copyright

Fanboyish elitism

Understanding Sociology/neoliberal, and consumerism is not worker.

Prosumerism

The pontifications of the term content is a mindless popularity contest
Malthusian Documentary one is strong.

Disagree

Certain geopolitical issues. (Maybe here and there though, Idk Already here and there.) Third campism. (I heard rumours that he talked with maga-coms? Not confirmed, don't take it at face value.)

References analogic reasoning to South Park, they are inconsistent to libertarian. Pot stirring provocateurs with their polemists, yet he's using them in a consistent.
(That Took my jerbs gag always gets me.) (Post-edit Couch Gregor)

My emptiness that he may of not read Susan Hacks Foundherentism.

Gatekeeping, I'm suspecting more of moral panic and status roles of others on Twitter and all that pearl clutching.

If I gave a completely arbitrary game review score 6/10 for this self publisher.

Okay, As Bonus on december edit he called out the latest video by Drew here ai being profitable being a capitalist mindset, he's still blogging it.

No politics = legelese recursive product of Governance

I'll steel man this then give a balanced take. On such a unbinding, unenforced legalese. Non state sanctioned.

In the void of the internet, there is no duty, no service, the long tail of distribution. From the pundit pot stirrers, to the Kardashians trying to look their concept of cute. Yet, social media is sold to the advertisers or the society of subscriptions. Vendors, serviceability.

It shows that this could be an entertainer, not a lecturer of governance, education, journalism, religion . Focusing on televisual rather than typographic expression; showmanship.

Since fiction is the legalese used for state protection for specific expression, not natural law.

This may suspend proselytisation and ideological presumptions of the viewer. All being part of a campaign.

So no controversy, politics imply two states at tension'n conflict. Along with fictional drama being within the subject. That's a charitable view. Keeping one's head down from the pot-stirring provocateur.

However, it's like a butler saying "It's not my job to have an opinion" it does bring questions, since it is not natural law anyhow.

I cannot tell the intentions of such an entertainment-ese layer. Since Interpretation and scrutiny of the media is used to help provide meaning. All the ideological presumptions will be guessed and speculated on, along with whether it being direct like satire or propaganda.

Whatever we reach and whatever we think. (Such as the clock metaphor, clock is the measurements of matter, the sociology of goals to tell the time.)

Right reasons, wrong reasons, undefined! Wow. Interpretation can matter.

I think of this writer snippet alot.

Things I agree/disagree of Stephanie: Moving on.

Interest wanes and falls

Because i'm not a gamer! ohh, maybe i'll snoop in your podcast and five years. I'm a freelance contract worker who happens to do

I agree with him with licensing here along up until AI which I'm not sure he's clarified about. I'm sure he's mislead. Legitmate fears, well, enjoy a lot of dildos and adult themes in this.
(Dildo references), Lot's of sex toys

I can't find myself enjoying 95% cases of licence. Wish it was consistent.

Replace EA with 'Disney' and replace customers with Independent artists. Class analysis and dialectical materialism.

Despite my disagreements, I did enjoy his video on Bogwarts. All of them. Well, Even Peter Coffin has words on that.

It goes south with her reaction to the AI thought, Peter Coffin, Alexander Avile, Sunny'm Cheax, Andy Masley have responded better.

Now I'll see if I can make with Peter Coffin, being the citizen investigator I will have to see his own way with the ai. Oh She's wrong on NFTS too. So, I must do my bid adieu as a customer and not follow.

Getting too moral panicky.

Gotcha Tribunals

 Thinking about Statecraft, Governance, and yes, Politics. Evaluating what Set thought.

Seth has written about it. Guess he's a liberal.

Tribalism, other than the colonial implications. Has its own sparring of power.

Or what they say about informal groups. Status and governance. 

Why is everybody thinking everything a trial to declare verdict on microbloggers?

Everything a villain? Everything a verdict. Complete in curiosity across with the microblogging mind, the amount of discourse is the take it in an amount, time to vary the way.

I'm seeing the reliance of willing misinformed opinions within the west. Relying on Ayn Rand, and now there are more pundits than every trying to out-do each other. Guess this is why we still have the academics.

As a general rule, don't bother if it takes a bibliography, since you got to stay in sync with oneself.

An Examination of L0ddism

 They did not have the insight. It does not deal with our desire for modernism. People cannot wrestle with the idea that there are times when, even with the crisis theory provided my Marx, they're still our tools and still another day.

I'll have to get out of this baby leftist mindset and see that how others cannot get their education from streamers and microbloggers. I can't learn from a Laggard, they can't be reached. So to stay in sync with myself.

First volume of capital I've tried to read. Try and get a correct interpretation, yet with this postmodern quote-mining wave of hyperreality. I'll go with this one.

Some retweets.

 ‪@segyges.bsky.social‬ from this thread

"the artisans are behaving like politically destructive rent-seekers and trying to reduce automation instead of seeking meaningful political change concerning ownership of capital and allocation of resources" is also orthodox marxist

the entire idea of fixed capital is that workers individually do not necessarily own the means of production; like, whether or not they morally should own their output, they do not, that is not how the thing works, and the social arrangement for large factories makes it complex to even try to do

-

i do think however that marx is correct on the basic points of

1) automation is good

2) luddism is bad

3) the problem is who controls the automation, and the wealth created by it, and who gets left out

4) the solution ultimately has to be the power of the state"

‪@bitesu.kawaii.social‬
"the luddites were not pro workers rights they were not a labor movement they were artisans and workshop owners and guild members who were financially threatened by industry because factories could produce textiles far cheaper than their poorly paid apprentices stop with this ahistorical nonsense

they were reactionaries who were opposed to progress because their own private enterprises were outcompeted by a new mode of production. "pro workers rights" like they weren't all guild artisans who had their own sweatshops where apprentices did all of the work
please read some actual theory and actual history for gods sakes or you're going to fall back into the trap of carrying water for petit bourgeois reactionaries impeding progress. not a single marxist with two brain cells to rub together is going to say "we have to go back before capitalism " cause that's the whole point!! new modes of production and new modes of social organization pave the way forward to newer yet modes of production and organization, some of which can even facilitate socialism (like industrial modes of organization. for example)"

(Oh and Ned Ludd ain't real, Brian Merchant is doing revisionist history.)

So Industrial mode of production =/= Artisinal Mode of production. That's the matter of the modernisation that we will do, moving forward. Reading with literature and the textbook

So the answer is.

NAY 👎🛋! Reject this Petit bougiese impulse and show sympathy to the industrial/working class who can't afford the artisanal modes of production

Along with the pull of plopyright shifts us to atomised alienation, resist the pulse! Gift economies, Pro bono, Creative commons licensing as alternatives.

Support Ghostwork and Turkpoticon and ignore the clown dogmatism at microbloggers.

They're basically going to go nowhere, like selfish Ayn Ryandists, and Male supremacist movement that happened within 2016 and then disappeared into obscurity. Ron Paul Supporters too! - It all comes around.

I don't even identify as a Marxist doctrinaire given how diverse my thought is with sociology'n all economical analytic thought, the way the west with it's movement are silly.

I will read more literature and textbooks on automation, yet we must shift our automation to replacement to reassembling, revolting along with the anti-trust of monopoly.

I Shall end with a quote from the Lorax

The Lorax

"What do you want? Shut down the factories? Make the workers lose all their jobs?"
"You have your point, Yet I don't know the answer" ~ Dr Suess, Despite my many disagreements with him. What an interesting paradox of handling our growth of our society, hmm?

Media capital vs Tech capital

Oh boy it's couch Gregor talking about capital again

Looks like

Couch Gregor is in his sociological mindset still!

Media
Social capital, Symbolic capital. and Relatability, based on status, from Pierre Bourdieu's observation.

Tech
Modes of production capital, agricultural, from the industrial, too artisanal, to the executive/directional

Did you know Economics are a way to say Marxism? It came from sociology.

So Commodified it vaporises thought

Be careful what media input you take.

Mass commodified content designed for kiddies evaporates from my brain from how easy consumable it is, guess the big-wigs knew, doing some thinking. I can't remember a Mr Beast video.

Well, it's not for me. Kids do love it, Not going to Junophobia it though, this is a thing with social media though, everybody comes and run it down to the ground, from everypart.

Guess FlazzFire has gone the edutainment route and deciding on to be a comedian, taking the vulgarism with it and writing like Chuck Palunuik. 

My fave part of this collage.

I'll keep following him. Cussy as it is, not as Academically rigorous. Welp, that's the problem with the plot/spectacle of Aristotle.

Fuzzy mirage of mental models/literacy/illiteracy

Happy Halloween! Here's a off-the-cuff essay by a philosophy student wanting literacy.

Yet I know I'll have to deal with mass communicating towards an illiterate audience outside.

What convinced me was Neil postman. Even with my Art Director brain that I have to learn at literacy, I haven't had to chance to read all the socialism books so that's why some of my feed are videos, so even if I'm not literate, I'm aware of the changing concepts closely rela

Otherwise, you get Vaush, missed that train, or Ed Zitron.

I call this new strain the prosumer leftism, which is absorbed within itself of its own social media bubble. Or wilfully misinformed leftism.

Yet with the right/left graph and the political compass, I'm going to have to do another post on that.

Time for Lanterns

 Start of walk today, then it ended in lanterns. No appetite for the potatoes as a brought back one with the swan.

It's the celebration of lanterns, making time out of zines with my manners, and it's all the family thing.

I do keep promises of keeping family first, all those streams I do are mearly sprinklings of an entertainment guy who decided to stream to get in tune with the project.

Viewing habits here

 Why oh why, I'm following the journalists' path, it shall be wretched as it was. I don't know if an opinion is binding, and litigation of summoning the eyeballs.

Everybody can editorialise (except for Alex Jones on platforms) Everybody can 'copyright' and media w**** out at the exchange value and not the use value as Karl Marx.

Even if the labour theory of value may be the thing, and automation will have to be rethought.

Welp, thank you for reading these thought patterns.

Co-Int By Ethan

Beep boop, read my wires boy, read my robutt wires.

That's it! I'm reading a book because the copyright wingers using there existance on abolshing fair use are too much.

 So I decided to try to get my moneys worth via reading research in this discovery of llms/diffusion models.

(Even if it's bad, I've read Ayn Rynd, is this comparable? Part of the writer's training! HOOOOOOOOOO!) Lets see how much this fascinates or tires me.

2023
Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick

I've changed my opinion

Starts with explanations of weights, and token prediction. Existential risk and ethics, lawsuits, Japan, ethics discussion. This if it's all a matter of understanding what the tech can do in terms of capabilities and incapabilities is going to really have to see through.

These four rules are his tenets that he elaborates on for a possible alternative with dealing with the tech, how people hide, how people use it, and what are the possible sci-fi futures that move along it. Here's his Ai Research blog.

I shall put him in the neutral AI category and better-reporting-that-Ed-Zetron-box. I'm going to keep his machine inferences under wraps.

Guess this is under the editorial because somebody having a nuanced take on machine learning is impossible now with this naughty journalist seeking those hot, HOT scoops!

It's over-editorialised now, huzzah.

Oh, He's got a bullied by doomers, thankfully he has the way. Others have committed to comment, calling bluesky a containment containing all the tantrums.

That's my close to looking into a nuanced AI thinker.