Interpretability the first one next-
Since copyright is a state sanctioned monopoly. Non-binding and unenforced. Freelance contract workers and the useful fiction of firms. It's not a platonic natural law.
Fair use advocates are appearing out of the seams. I can only sympathise due to the misinformation of micro bloggers.
The technical term is infringement, not plagiarism, and it ain't a felony. More an embarrassment.
Propriety drm won't solve this. This lawyer questioned the nofakes act, I agree. Thankfully it's not in effect.
"Why you should be worried about the NO FAKES Act:
-Threatens free expression and fair use
-Expands copyright law with broad language and vague definitions
-Harms open-source AI and tech innovation
-Would impact transformative works like fan and remix culture"
https://ccianet.org/articles/the-real-costs-of-the-no-fakes-act/
Welp, wish it the best. The lawyer is getting annoyed with the concept of 'market dilation' I'd say due to long tail there'd be diffuse, and I'm looking into automation from other sources other than the old doctrine of dialectical materialism.