Suppressing a riot

Fuzzy shapes

A smack

Then blood.

Then gone.

Then it's shock.

Then a cry

Then further cacophony.

Then silence

Another Hernia Scar

like that? Yeah, like that.

There's a diamond scar where I accidentally pulled a scab with surgical tape, yet its not the worst thing.

 

The neverending spectacle of transactionalism

This is what I talk about: when commodity relations own conscious awareness, it becomes apparent. Seth tells me to see it, and with the way to see these forces to predict with this entitlement of profit with the way communities form, also Fudge the MRA has been a dead head, yet all dead ends rest within anti-intellectualism.

Ivory tower to the Main road

Plot to spectacle since Aristotle.

Buying in or selling out
Quiet to load

Intention (noesis) to Randomness noise

Coherent to incoherent.

Serious to Play
Alienate to condescend

We live in the totality of the spectacle; there's not escaping it. Either we embrace the media of our entertainment in its many iterations of it's infinity, or we log off entirely. Or embrace with Dejourment. Of the tautology of the spectacle. It's circular reasoning, we will have to wrestly. Lean in become a generic hack, lean out become an anti-social elitist weirdo.

So thank you, industry, for making me see this.

So, with the macro, meso, and micro scales, do we deal with it? To see it. Of the Labour theory of value.

No winning with the leaning. We are overdominated by it already.

Thanks Deboard.

Reflection on knowledge rant

The Gish gallop, of the spectacle, and the reverse gish gallop.

Yet now, with all these moralisations and the elitism and the ideas with

it now, it's become apparent that I've made a professional risk. Not like Beep_boop took my job, or that I had one.

I did it because it was fun, this ain't going to get any points. Yet the 'left' and critcal theory. Of a polemic that drives an epistemological scrutiny. Social media overlapping it. I don't want to take any of it back.

This revised ranty essay along with it's reading list on the AI denial cottage industry. Is exhausting, commodities of denial, and other ways that lead to believe. That it's a thing that I have to let the crud happen. Let the crud hit the fan as I must attend other duties.

Yet America's factionalism loves its teams and gish gallops, and I'm done.

Can still not stop editing it. By this time, this post, though, I'll be done and continuing with my artistic endeavours.

The feeling when they're not ready for the amount of sociological research

I've done can't be comprehended into a single dunk tweet, and I dare not

interrupt the anger within micro blogs.

It's merely too BIG i can't fit it in, such aliteral mobs
harrasmenet to handle such a complexity.

Reflecting on this, can only say it was worth it. It's the most iconclastic thing I've

ever done, and it's spirit of Harlen Ellison's rant within his Glass Teat.

He's gone now.

ah, Symbolic capital, and the structural things

are reversed now, as 1Dime points out.

That now I'm apathetic of, with that case since the divide is the ethics with all that.

It is trying to put out a fire of bad ideas before it's too late, as it goes with the way of vaccine denial. Along with other bad ideas that have spread like wildfire.

Yet wildfires are wildfires. Criticism becomes commodified and incentivised

by the perverse incentives of online media, and there you are, forever.

40+ rewrites and illustrations of doodle-core and my other more serious expression.

It's an attempt to apply serious sociology to it all with all that I know from bad historiography, and with Althusserian sociology, I've been trying to make it out.

It's so exhausting. Is this what white-collar work feels like? Is this what working in an office feels like? I'm so tired from trying to catch up with the Americas' day and night work as I'm drawn towards its spectacle.

This is my alternative opinion of you as a citizen to bring in thought to rewrite.

Roleplaying as a couch golem – OF COURSE. I'm obsessed with AI effects, the miserablist/doomer/boomer and the industries intertwined outside them. I'm going to have to go rogue.

Since it's not a scam and it's a logic that's made me annoyed that I have to deal with the pestering insufferability of bsky discourse I've tried to avoid, I'm glad I'm out.

Wanted to do something different from porn, as they say. 

Thank you for all your understanding.

Yes Seth, you do know it.

Done. (until it's adapted away from the micro blog

discourse.)

Oh no, I did'nt use beep boop for that

 I merely expressed deontic relational intelligence.

Real good ai btw despite my vigourous

research. I'll reach out. Even as goals may not align.

Bonus. This could be for the epilogue.

This article, even with such non-trusted people in state positions, tends to make me reflect.

Yeah

"It’s both intellectually and morally thin. But it’s also unawarely hypocritical. That’s because, at its root, this anti-tech discourse is ironically anti-human. It frames us as the machines. We’re positioned as passive victims of digital services and the devices they’re served through in ways that discount our capacity for agency, intentionality and responsibility. It’s insulting because we’re deemed to be morons by default, incapable of reforming our habits."

"Phones “make” us distracted. AI “makes” us lazy. Algorithms “make” us tribal. Social media “makes” us narcissistic

It’s a cheap and lazy story, though, which is why it works. Where’s the immediate reward in encouraging things like self-discipline, intention, healthy adaptation, self-awareness, anxiety culture, negative social norms and personal responsibility."

Prosumer copyright doctrinaire : a smuggery disorder

IS THIS AI??

no!

Well.

Numpty or smugness?

Oh look at all thes flumpity dials! Including myself, it is! Get em!

WAAA copyright plaigraism infringment  something something bad must interpret for the defend

Becoming sex ambivalent

 

Since the recollection of traumas and the labour of sexual gratification is all a mere roteness of drudgery act of the day, despite the pleasure principle of the faugue state it brings, my sexual pleasures aren't that special. It's nobodys business, as I've argued with with the sex work book.

Yet.

It's like I've been here before with my sexual expression, as if it's a think to become something to curate within a sexual perfectionism. Such kinkology could of become a trap to find a way down into monkey-see, monkey-do.

The moment one develops interests from it. Or not a vote for abstinence or something against porn. I don't want to be an entire idenity.

So, this is a foundherent acknowledgment, of the completeness of the bad and good of my body's sexual expression with how that relates to the mental labor, with all that intwined into the mesh of the relation of our desires.

(Edit, called it sex work book. My bad. Apologies who misinterpreted. Bad direct response.)

Do they notice the hustle miasma?

 No, I don't know if they could, even as I attempt to return from the bottom.

Shifting shadows now.

Now they send me reassurances.

That I'm a fraudulant derative hack or that I'm not?

Shadows, I can't win within there presumptions of trends that defy any sense, any mental reason. With any line of reality that brough with coherentism or incoherentism be damned

to want to be popular, or commodiular, or slopular

well liked for their well-likedness.

Going to communicate like lenin and clothes

to the normies, average people, to the intelligent fools with the bad acumen of intelligence to nowhere

The cute shapes of the deep sea party rings

They're cute aren't they

Remind me of a time much simpler of nostalgia and sincerity.

Now I'm burdened with bringing ribofunctional stochastic material. 

People merely call me this soulouss monstoristy.

Yet Jaime.

Do you now that I like to feel like a child with these fun times.

Macro mob rule; Random waves; The deal.

Mass media spectacle, manufactured into commodity, into commoditized community of fandoms.

Play into the commodity genre, prosumer or selling out, play out of it, elitist or antisocial.

No winning or do not play? Seek an alternative of the horned dilemma with work and sport?

Not going to wing with a algorithm, or macro waves of attentional focus that are a mixture of misinformed and misguided.

Synoptic Reading, On Tech Relations.

(Your likely can move that capitalist realism down to meh)

Wedge this between pretty alright, since it ain't related. With dirty secrets of the record business.

What did we learn? From these ideas? Of the ongoing desire to build a material basis. Of ideas/expressions and with all that of dialectical.

For another blog post. Yet the liberals are bringing a knife to a gun fight. Even though I wanna criticise the conservative response, Nick lands accelerationism.

Here's me attempt to educate myself. This is an accumulation of all the tech relations with the classes.

The ones on LLMs are Ethan Mollick and AI snake oil. Yet it has lead to the hustle culture.

(Are you a sociologist?!) Yes. Althusserian. Time to do honey instead of vinegar. Sooo, you wanna read audiobooks? 🛋️👉👈 

                                  

The first two audiobooks to intake with the Beep_Boop to intake platonically if you don't like the written word.

Ethan Mollick brings the latest news, While snake oil brings in the jagged frontier.

These are the ways of the jagged frontier, so I'll see a lot of cultural shifts and a lot of false polemics (mwurica) thanks didney, violence with boobies and moralising and high horsing and silly wonks.

These are the culture of the internet, and with big vertical integrated media sources move us. With how this internet functions for the technofeudalist we go by now.

This one's more libertarian yet can be mid with the same spirit.

This is an account of the West and its response and the lack of stigma within China and other countries. It's like these two books are for understanding LLMs.

Harlen Ellison's chapter about pay toilets is worth adding. Attention merchants is understand how much direct response has shaped our culture. With the gift of the gift economies.

He condemned certain reactionary scab union practices while working with his own mediocrity of being an entertainer, and with that he made his adieu with his own organising. While he attempted to teach others where the pride in the craft was concerned

We are on the precipice of philosophies and disagreements. So yeah, enjoy the bumpy ride of the ragged frontier of Beep_Boop.

This one points it out.

Bonus one the reading list.

On my reading list, the left is more bioessentialist; the right is of mental labour and our history. Regardless, I will challenge my ideological presumptions and see if they lead me into life-changing revelations. I don't think I'll be achronological in literary interpretation; now I don't think we ever were.

Oh here's my review of Matteo Pasquinelli's book

Wow, Abi's got African philosophy and a substack . with the rebranding, maybe it will move others away from the doomerist/miserablist

This one was on my feed too, to be decided. He may be wrong about the anthropomorphic lawsuit, though. IDK cannot entertain it now.

"Sam Altman will hate it" Says within the promotional material. With all the venture capitalists going back'n forth. It'd be 

Oh, This is the indie essay scene of materialist semoitics.

Looks like a tech preperationist (Oh well, Will be categorised regardless)

Guess I'll put that book on my wishlist.

How did we get here with this polysemic tech?

This is for my big deep dive of LLM tech essay previously.

Long landscape

Months, healing up.

2026 Stalking Horses on brain damage.

Since a new year, the age of the crank over tech thats was in 1950s to 2015, then became capitalised and brought.

https://www.buzzsprout.com/2396236/episodes/17378968-you-deserve-better-brain-research.mp3 and this other one calls the findings mis-based

NWDR Another incoherent talking poing without examining the reactionary capital.

Peter Coffin also Covered it, Yeah, in some forms the lump of cognition. Again, not again

noo

Oh, additional reading, the academics has picked it up.

This essay

Including this other one who gave benefit of the doubt.

Getting increasing convinced that this fanactism

AND ANOTHER THING, plato had the same view on this.

Despite my love for audiobooks and text-to-speech to intake knowledge platonically. He can be wrong, along with the noble lie.

"I keep returning to the sentence I heard in San Francisco: “Maybe atrophying people’s brains is the price we pay for curing Alzheimer’s with AI.”

I understand why it lands. It captures a fear many people feel but struggle to articulate: that AI may give humanity extraordinary power while leaving individual humans diminished inside the world it creates.

That isn’t the future we have to build."

Ahem! Excuse me, discourse can drive a coach loony.🛋💫

A Hearty Mortem response to attempting to make style trade dress.

NO.

I must recover from the trauma of preposterousness.

Peter Coffin lose all bargaining leverage under proprietary drm.

aah

ahh

all those fanartists, satires, journalists, gone!

ah

it's over now.

maybe in the dank depths like those anita content farms