The culture of the Narcissim, of egoist desire

Various Lacan Refutations and gags are shared.

Yet with this way, it's like our own ideas and eyes to the manner of mental diving, it could be capital, and we could leave it that. Yet with that with how society functions.

Yet this one is with the lack of imagining of the past and where things go forgotton, where the spam goes, where the ideas go.

The romanticised family and how, in a way, it essentially reflected another anti-American kind of critique of culture.  The things that resonate with a rustic sentiment of wanting things to stay in the past, even in certain liberal critiques and other ways, and how those things get recuperated and brought back into the fold.

One could always call this a return to anti-intellectualism now, and the Glonzo theories that I keep hearing from the microbloggers as I try to do my studies.

Family theories, too many family theories. But the concept of narcissism, with roots going back, and how that concept itself has become another quick grift of hustlers with a feverish entitlement to profit and plenty of justifications for that profit, a perverse incentive. 

But oh, what a surprise. There is not even a simple idea anymore that cannot be sold now as they take it up in the arms of this new, ongoing culture war.

Going to have to hunker down, even though I know it's not going to be the case. So that's my first impression.

Ways of seeing by John Berger did this critique better

So now I'm going with that audio book with various intellectuals in substack as this moral panic passes.

Shameless hustle and anti-hustle culture

Work hard or work not. There is an external force out there that cannot be impacted by your work, and that is unaware of all these things. 

Is that how connectionism works? Or labour? Or the un-found labour? 

Seth Godin always said, 'People like us do things like this.' Is that relying on external forces? Is it that my aesthetic autonomy maximises, or is it the agency of that thing? 

With all those things going together, I am seeing that the way of virality is blind.

We keep warning

They keep not listening; there will be blocking if this ever happens

Influencers are the princes of the media monopolies.

Proprietary DRM is a reactionary capital tech.

LLM/Ethereum/cryptography are anarchic tech.

2022-23, and the anarchic fireworks, and, boom. 🎆🎇🎆

What can be reclaimed?

That's the fact remaining, of the mid-wit now, and endoursed with these subtweets.

Destroy this industry for me

 Had to watch Harmful Opinions; did not know his voting habits. Idc. Not that presumptive.

Idc about the language taboos now since I'm a dignitary to the internal rules.

So happy to view other views through independent research, even though I don't decide to be an independent researcher.

So that, with his way of thinking that "gamers deserve the worst" oof, the blame game, whatever the ritual negativity and all, and trying to explain with the pop YouTube scene, is making me jaded.

So, the delusion is that as LLms are used averagely and specifically, there are many cases I now see with academia and the cancel culture that will be with it all. This is the way we cope with the interchange.

The horror of the spectacle

 when will it end

yet disinformation

falling togtether,

repeat

Either your using the AI (Global workspace theory) or it's using you.

Sunk fair weathers

Random business owner, good takes though

What may happen.

I did my best to try to be reasonable, yet now it's going to be more ghosts, more giving less of a cushion, and more careful curation of my feed list.

"I had to block mutuals since they were sharing techlash editorials since they could not know that much." Another leftist programmer, well, progressive, as in 'progressive' can mean many things now. Regressive to progressive to one signal to another.

The crack in the window of the atheists with the crack of the window with 2023 cannot be undone. It's why we can't unite, and that's good.

What are we doing now? What with our own minds with the Cult of Reason and the religion of humanity, all for the symbolic capital of copyright maximalism.

What are we on.

plzdontkillus Cybersecurity encounter

Oh my, oh dear, as I engaged with the subject, I got on an odd subject, refusing the cognitive surrender myth twice. With the capitalist left from the 18th-century midwit tendencies I've tried to avoid.

What ho?? On my substack feed.

So I decided to move my hot gay butt to attempt to continue to discuss AI in civil contexts.

This of the safety bootcamp
Along with that, I tried to get in with the odd question of the cow.

There was a myth about dudes and a community of practice, despite it being dismissed in the programmers microblogs. Ones with other blogs of the way safety should be treated with the goal of educating or shouting to the public with what it means to deal with the new era of ai with america defending its intellectual and copyright property owners

to quote

How english it all is! Polite buggery! I've already argued with the conceptual distinction deciding the debate.

Alignment-by-default versus goal orthogonality on the Cosmos Institute

Yet, with others that I look at in the safety research, then there are others in uk having a manner of ultra-politeness to the current moral panic.

Recommended Robert Miles Ai Safety

Is this it? Graphic design is so quirky n' frumpy!

Well, I did my viral, game the system nonsense and all that marketing know-how; it didn't work with all the direct-response compute I got, So nope. Despite the pretentious mini-publishers' celebrities/influencers not taking notice of the latest popular trend. Well liked for its well-likedness.

uhh

Okay I'm done!

Got my email

what

It's interesting though, they direct me to videos on the blackhat. Like this. With indeterminate oopity driving the process, you draw your own thoughts.

The day I missed on 21 july

Internet outage engineers said they couldn't fix.

Well that streak broke of intuitive counting for about 1200 days plus.

Now i reset.

Its a shame, really, yet I know what friends and acquaintances mean, especially fair weather acquaintances done.

It was a way to be in common with myself, and with others. With all the ways it can.

That's human slop for ya, or commodity grade that I owned.

NVM.

I streamed on my mobile before I fell asleep. Good enough.

Beep-boop Bioweapons

Some populist microblogger is misreading headlines once again. Screenshotting the headline and going (OH NO)

Wow, thanks, media determinism, with the moral panic industry complex with several 9/11s happening simultaneously. Now I know why I respect principled entertainers who distract from the stressful days.

This is to prevent viruses, not the other way around. Gonna quote Dame.

This only works if you don't have a copyright maxmilist poistion and platonic elitism, what where is midjourney doing, oh? it's medical scanners, nvm.

With Peter Coffin bringing in his documentary of what will replace the old breadtube order. Hbomberguy concerned with the platonic elitism with all

The damage of micro-bloggers and the comprehensible gap within the information age is an understatement; I can't do anything to fix this since I need to be a celebrity influencer in order to get any sway within this discourse.

Too ahead of this when I knew the terminally stuck in the presentism so I'm keeping it here.
Jeremy Bentham with the discourse being stuck within sunk costs within america
"If you want to know how AI will affect the world, don’t imagine current AIs simply continuing on into the future. Imagine the world being flooded by AIs that make our current models look like child's playthings—and those being used to build the next generation of AI. Imagine, for the first time, creating something much smarter than humans. I don’t know exactly what’s coming down the pipeline, but it will be strange and terrifying. We are summoning digital aliens into our world, and we are not ready, and we are complaining about the water they’ll drink."

Some politely unfollow me at this point. That's good enough; wading in with options undiscovered is part of the price of connectionism. We exist.

Couch Gregor looks like a bioweapon may be much harder than that. Noah Smith and Jeremy

Wow, so even with all the political scientists, white hat programmers vs black hat. The white ones work.

Sam Harisomy post with his links also works

https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/50/3/86/135683/Deception-and-Detection-Why-Artificial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wgImjg9PPc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_verification

Hugging Face? Well, here's the video on that and the cryptographer

He responded.

Now, we do the cyber-security dance once again. At least it isn't the chronobacteria theorising. So yeah, when they said mainstream media is dead, well, it's alive, perhaps for all the wrong reasons though.

Exhamined, niche nothingness

That was always the neoliberal market advice, and I'm not sure if I'm following that right now. Of all things, like what you're going to do with being a niche of something finite unless you buy advertising.

So now we are going to go and see if these things will work, and if they don't, I'll go and try to see if I can function in another way. They will discover you; they will find you, put you on a list, and categorise you in a box. Then they will just go on, silly little elitists wanting their product to be consumed. 

It's all prosumerist all the way down, and I don't care anymore. I don't want to be a part of it.

Neither Anti-populist or Anti-elite, only a knowledge Anti-mid of foundherentism

Going to comment on this more fully.

Wow, queit ventures, quiet ventures.

Dead Audience Theory

Since sombody threw a tantrum at me using tts to read my academia.

I'm now brought to believe in dead audience theory.

 So, Now dead audience theory By somebody who is AI-assisted.

This had an ai assisted illustration in it.

Why is it that the anti-science sentiment of simple solutions to complex problems plagues me? middlebrow to highbrow misinformation in American polemics from 2022 2023.

Have you got it too, the mildest blue of tech value, then a shocked person in your stream?

By the look of things, I have not even followed this supposed technocritic once. I don't think he implies it; Neil Postman probably would be able to draw circles around him.

Why do I keep iterating? Well, I don't know; maybe because I have no influence outside of this little tiny plug. With all the things going on outside, I have to take into consideration other people's views the diversity of viewpoints from those who do use the tool and those who don't. 

I'm picking up nice signals that can help me complete my viewpoint in understanding these issues more holistically. Now, that's what you may call critical thinking.

The alternative mind on Neurodiversity

Minds and its activism of alternative thinking and other pathways of how its history has always impacted my autism. So we have to understand this isn't going to be a long game of fighting in the trenches, trying to get recognised via a normal people, and even then you're trying to go against the grain with others in the normal way.

Normalisation of this little section, like here. That i can't help.

Am I really in that normal to you? 

Floppy desire

its old and weathered

And im like it, techno fundirung.

With all those flat little lines of memory locked into a little thing from the 1970s that we all danced and enjoyed, with a white square cubicle of computer fascination and being connected with the wires. But then we aren't connected to the wires. 

Because of all the things that happened to us, and happen to now, it is all going to stop from the data conception of today. And even when I attempt to reconnect and desire that finely rung connection, it's like all those things—all those times—This eyes flatten, and it's still there in my windlass soul, slightly deteriorating bit by bit, but still there.

Nobody wakes up wanting to be hustled

Especially the hustlers.

Since there are the circles within entertainment, with all the ideas moving

Hustletainment

Anti-hustle culture, though, when it's a matter of unpredictability outside. I don't know if it's predictable.

20 luddos vs one rocker

Wow, being an excavator golem is sure tough. I've been invited into a debate versus 20 annoying what they call leftists, and now I'm here in the debate club explaining my existence to these environmentalists and labour warriors. It's like a bloody brawl. Is this some kind of pillock play-acting?

They still bring up these talking points and shift the definitions to their own semantic little boxes, and I try to explain back to them. But with all the statistics and things, there is only so much I can do. Am I a right-wing reactionary? Apparently, though, I am not that type of golem.

I feel like I have done all the showmanship I can, but I cannot be the only one doing these things now. It feels like I am just doing this over and over again.

Well, I'm going to get a Cornish pasty after all of this. I tell you what, it's just stupid ninnies snarling away in their own grouse house.

They threatened to take there toys away

My toys!

Refusing to debate on Microblogging, or not

Only to the curious

Well

Too many reassurances

Then a snide capitulation if I don't know what I'm talking about

Then a matter of the midwits of the west

It's all a totality of the spectacle

Bread and Circus

To the twitch streamer

Theres no winning.

Not like it matters once they a get a disney endorsed model, despite hating it aswell.

That's what populist lolcowing is, always cruft.

Not an ally.

Leif Weatherbys frenchy Semiology book

Beware, French structuralist theory ahead

Since French semiology and all that terminology are in fashion now, somebody in the digital humanities had to reflect on the cultural tech zeitgeist that we're all facing. Being the one out of it.

Such as the term 'kitsch' and all the things that might team with a function and poesis, dyscobia, and a convincing case of non-consciousness being about, I am yet to suspend my judgement on that.

He does reveal that this kind of cultural panic and humanism have an archaic route within Noam Chomsky. Something I'm not going to have to watch out for are the coming years, as we embrace a rather radical centrism of data and pros of a scientific rigour.

The way such it is, as he has better terminology than all of American exceptionalism, though, is giving me solace, because such a spectacle we observe, and this is being understood now from outside of it, and that's going to be good enough in Europe.

Oh, the denial is getting remorseless, deeper in periods now as I explore the polemics.

The wars continue.