Don't interrupt the popular bad idea

Persuade or perish, so they say.

Yes, I do advise not getting gouged by a bull in a china shop that does not know it's dead with the tranquilisers in, or read/listen to the room. Yet all those preconditions are not known.

Bull needs to be left in the china shop or be gored by its horn, so no horned dilemma. Leave the stadium of horned dilemmas.

Still updating my main essay investigation

Spellings applied, I've been on substack and rabbit holes like a veteran. 🛋🌃

with more doodle-core gags. Despite they may hate this aswell. No winning from propertarian domnion I suppose.

 Memetic a go go for curiosity bait..

For my hobby, critical theory? I got two pieces of feedback from literature/sociology. That's cool. Getting disquistions and essaykins back. Including the bottom right.

Free read > 🛋👉 3rd version off you can see the bottom right of all the indie knowledge work. Skeptics welcome except for propertarians.

I'm still working on version 3, so other feedback and second opinions are welcome.

If I can't deliver the impact to video essay format on YouTube, then I'll be alright here. It's not like the reach there may be shared.


Bonus.

This article, even with such with non-trusted with state positions, tends to make me reflect.

Yeah

"It’s both intellectually and morally thin. But it’s also unawarely hypocritical.

That’s because, at its root, this anti-tech discourse is ironically anti-human. It frames us as the machines. We’re positioned as passive victims of digital services and the devices they’re served through in ways that discount our capacity for agency, intentionality and responsibility. It’s insulting because we’re deemed to be morons by default, incapable of reforming our habits."


So Bye bye Propertarians! 👏🛋 Not falling down that rabbit hole.

My Birthday!

 
Thanks for everyone enrolling with me. 🛋⭐

look at those balloons

On organic labels of pseudo reality

On the realgoodai trying to move out, while the 'real' artist is now harassing others with the propertarian moral panic, being temporarily embarrassed by franchise landlords with the witch hunts.

The genie isn't out of the bottle; these were the natural conditions that were already here.

So, we are in the crunchy stuff now. Of the ideological madness of fame/infamy?

Saying impartiality.

Do some feel like the turtle having to hide ride now?

😕

via smatterbrain

Drew this with worried interaction that might happen if they make a hit-piece/call out.

They already doing it again.

Oh dear, what will I do if I get misinterpreted?

Nothing, I guess.


This is where authorship becomes an ambiguous concept of the right to free expression

and the right for oblivion.

This brings authorship again as I peruse Substack.

should i disclose copy-pasting Seth godins blog post from the doctrinaires? Idc.

Happy pride.

Convienient eristics heuristics; The Commercial metrology trap

Once you see algorithms develop, you'll see how they think, through philosophy of mind.

You cannot unsee.

There monotizing meterolgy. The connectionism, then the grissere of a metaphysical labour, to the unpaid labor.

On A-chronicity catechism

First impressions.

There are books of catechism, interpretations of many minds.

I can't contain such work with the times ahead.

Like as if you would carry the voices here on after.

I haven't looked at the inside book yet

So a poem of contrivance.

Prosumer metrology: On the The Eye Of the Master.

Even with the general intelligence being a category error, I'll give you that. That's a good examination of the Beep Boop using the labour theory of value that's within good faith.

We know it's eliminative all the way down with funnel metrics, and the e-begging and the coherency are brought and sought by many minds.

Yet what of the experience of Taylorism and measurement of the manner in which the mindset is employed? The meaning completely changes within the connectionism of the market, which is already a generalised construct within the internet, and which you participate in.

It's abstraction, an abstraction of our labour for all your labour lovers out there.

Well done for blowing my mind with the grissiere and abstract labour, from which we build ideas from the corpus of knowledge that we dialectically, positively and negatively construe of the dreams of the perceptron and all these mechanical terms that make your living mind think.

Yet a dialect aside, even a negative dialectic (as the Frankfurters would go) will happen to go.

Oh how our internet has made us into commodified communities as a mentally salient sorting mechanism in order not to lose ourselves from the delusion, even beyond the general intelligence as it's defined now.

It's specialised ain't it? Apart from that disagreement, five stars.

Woke 2 ain't happening, back to traditional queer theory.

 No, I'm not part of it, outgrown my 20's now.

Yet there those eho do anti-social , elitist, or selling out of criticsl theory.

Oh, 1dime on anti-social adventurism ain't praxis. Theres alsi refutations too such as the cubs gay marches as queer theory advocates who go for there rights. Yet this is the problem of perect coherency, its always messy, sometime obscure, somtimes obvious.

Case by case.

Guess with the campism, then theres no perfect coherency, as with social media, as with the ways llms effect us.

That's what it takes to be a sociologistp

On Classifiers

Sadly, I see their use is more common now.

Peeps are paranoid about commodification; these are the algorithms and heuristics which linguistics has toppled too. And now they're checking through this. This has been checked adversarially, intuitively and counter-intuitively through a Socratic construction, with some autocomplete along with some other thoughts.

Pangram and others don't work. Or the self-abnegation of personal responsibility. Shall I quote? With that

Anyhow, here are two articles on why they are not to be trusted. Oh yeah, did I tell you the classifiers don't work in and of themselves? Well, you are the product. More on the math here.

Wow, look at that math.

Including a linguistic lesson on negative construction.

“It's not X. It's why” is a linguistic construction, more specifically, a “contrastive negation followed by a corrective assertion.” It's part of a rich “grammatical context for negated restrictives in English.” Olli O. Silvennoinen wrote an entire doctoral dissertation of 131 pages on contrastive negation.

(Off Tangent, he does try the cult thing; that's a fandom thing, though. It's my opinion.)

So, what do we do? Trust, trust that it is.

In search for the iconclastic sociologist

'Speaking truth to power' With this brought to by view.

"Speaking truth to power" I knew the state ain't going to go away, individuals, institutions (firms non-profit) and government.

Anti-woke time of a limited supply, be it cognition of material resources can't at time be held, they may be shared.

Epistemic scaling does not comply to the bandwagon. Im afraid. Not all things can be funneled with the limited discovery of intelligence as "power"

This has lead into academic industrialisation and it's complex that leads into the furtherment of the publish-or-perish mindset,  To quote him. He's another former Marxist.

This was this sociologist's view, btw. Is he calling others anti-social?

Yet such a polemic of epistemology scrutiny is a thing that drives such I thing that I'm having to grapple with reading others, even with other's of ideas/concepts are being a free-for-all with the social sciences being free.

Sweet darling little concious mote

These dwindling blips that move us to communicate and connect.

Such as the agreements that are made separate again.

You're never going to know if you're going to be ghosted within this land of other cyberbeings moving towards infinity by the technofeudalism.

That's the punishment of being a techno serf in a tilling world. Externally determined outside.

(Haven't read that technofeud book btw) I'm writing this on in the pub, on demand. Thx for your time. Got a lot on my plate.

Unpretentious traffic

When they say the hack, its all eliminative materialism all the way down.

So attempt to do it. Or not, flow with the water of unpaid labor.

That's how social technology operates, thats how it amplifies the prior knowledge and all that. Well, conservative epistemology speaking, bayesium manner.

Such as these formulas of social media are brought towards, the the unpaid labor of our desires can be made in leisure.

Or, how it is tracked and computed. Every time under direct response compute.

The Conception of original thought, aetiology.

Now, for some amateur philosophy.

Since there is no extraterrestrial deity out of there, what will we do with such an idea, of our epistemic actions through our own manner?

The pineal gland was once, yet our proprioception is all of that entails the conscious experience of the phenomenon of the perceived world, and the eye and the master.

Yet what ho, without reference that I can spin these theories without referring to any referent?

It's since I'm putting my thoughts within a space of land; I know I own the confidential property rights this sharecropped plot of land holds. Yet I'm doing unpaid labour for you now.

To that extent, I'm that of an artisan; a begrudging capitalist that I know it or not, trying to reach out in sympathy.

Yet.

With all the odd things labelled as anti-worker, this is the land where I extend my foundherent knowledge.

It's an act of selflessness and non-self that's for you.

So, enjoy our ideals and our ideologies as they go.

That we are sophistic monkeys or stochastic parrots. I write those two labels without any seriousness.

Is something.

On beep_boop quietism

Shh

You here that

Sometimes its the correct poistion in raise of harassment.

Along with being a servile, stepofordian drone of western american moral panic.

Nobodys gonna come out, including those who claim to be anthro_centric.

it's laready rime to do it too late, with the way 

who cares

Funny sex joke reads

Writing the mega-essay took a lot out of me, back to otium. Proudest iconclasdic work.

Again, I'm an irenicist when it comes to beep boop, so consider this journalism against the cognitive Bias.

Yet at the time when this simple and difficult conversations. I'm going to have to consider if it's like I'm going to interupt.

Ho to rip a mans D___ off which is another.

Beep boop Girlfriends of investigative journalism

Beep boop Orgasm

aaaaaaaaaaah

Sex reads overloaded with incomrpehensible sex essay, It was a high performer though!

Sexy sex.

Suppressing a riot

Fuzzy shapes

A smack

Then blood.

Then gone.

Then it's shock.

Then a cry

Then further cacophony.

Then silence

Another Hernia Scar

like that? Yeah, like that.

There's a diamond scar where I accidentally pulled a scab with surgical tape, yet its not the worst thing.

 

The neverending spectacle of transactionalism

This is what I talk about: when commodity relations own conscious awareness, it becomes apparent. Seth tells me to see it, and with the way to see these forces to predict with this entitlement of profit with the way communities form, also Fudge the MRA has been a dead head, yet all dead ends rest within anti-intellectualism.

Ivory tower to the Main road

Plot to spectacle since Aristotle.

Buying in or selling out
Quiet to load

Intention (noesis) to Randomness noise

Coherent to incoherent.

Serious to Play
Alienate to condescend

We live in the totality of the spectacle; there's not escaping it. Either we embrace the media of our entertainment in its many iterations of it's infinity, or we log off entirely. Or embrace with Dejourment. Of the tautology of the spectacle. It's circular reasoning, we will have to wrestly. Lean in become a generic hack, lean out become an anti-social elitist weirdo.

So thank you, industry, for making me see this.

So, with the macro, meso, and micro scales, do we deal with it? To see it. Of the Labour theory of value.

No winning with the leaning. We are overdominated by it already.

Thanks Deboard.

Reflection on knowledge rant

The Gish gallop, of the spectacle, and the reverse gish gallop.

Yet now, with all these moralisations and the elitism and the ideas with

it now, it's become apparent that I've made a professional risk. Not like Beep_boop took my job, or that I had one.

I did it because it was fun, this ain't going to get any points. Yet the 'left' and critcal theory. Of a polemic that drives an epistemological scrutiny. Social media overlapping it. I don't want to take any of it back.

This revised ranty essay along with it's reading list on the AI denial cottage industry. Is exhausting, commodities of denial, and other ways that lead to believe. That it's a thing that I have to let the crud happen. Let the crud hit the fan as I must attend other duties.

Yet America's factionalism loves its teams and gish gallops, and I'm done.

Can still not stop editing it. By this time, this post, though, I'll be done and continuing with my artistic endeavours.

The feeling when they're not ready for the amount of sociological research

I've done can't be comprehended into a single dunk tweet, and I dare not

interrupt the anger within micro blogs.

It's merely too BIG i can't fit it in, such aliteral mobs
harrasmenet to handle such a complexity.

Reflecting on this, can only say it was worth it. It's the most iconclastic thing I've

ever done, and it's spirit of Harlen Ellison's rant within his Glass Teat.

He's gone now.

ah, Symbolic capital, and the structural things

are reversed now, as 1Dime points out.

That now I'm apathetic of, with that case since the divide is the ethics with all that.

It is trying to put out a fire of bad ideas before it's too late, as it goes with the way of vaccine denial. Along with other bad ideas that have spread like wildfire.

Yet wildfires are wildfires. Criticism becomes commodified and incentivised

by the perverse incentives of online media, and there you are, forever.

40+ rewrites and illustrations of doodle-core and my other more serious expression.

It's an attempt to apply serious sociology to it all with all that I know from bad historiography, and with Althusserian sociology, I've been trying to make it out.

It's so exhausting. Is this what white-collar work feels like? Is this what working in an office feels like? I'm so tired from trying to catch up with the Americas' day and night work as I'm drawn towards its spectacle.

This is my alternative opinion of you as a citizen to bring in thought to rewrite.

Roleplaying as a couch golem – OF COURSE. I'm obsessed with AI effects, the miserablist/doomer/boomer and the industries intertwined outside them. I'm going to have to go rogue.

Since it's not a scam and it's a logic that's made me annoyed that I have to deal with the pestering insufferability of bsky discourse I've tried to avoid, I'm glad I'm out.

Wanted to do something different from porn, as they say. 

Thank you for all your understanding.

Yes Seth, you do know it.

Done. (until it's adapted away from the micro blog

discourse.)

Oh no, I did'nt use beep boop for that

 I merely expressed deontic relational intelligence.

Real good ai btw despite my vigourous

research. I'll reach out. Even as goals may not align.

Prosumer copyright doctrinaire : a smuggery disorder

IS THIS AI??

no!

Well.

Numpty or smugness?

Oh look at all thes flumpity dials! Including myself, it is! Get em!

WAAA copyright plaigraism infringment  something something bad must interpret for the defend