Nakedly easy-to-read relations

Are they pretending to hide their relationalism of the metrics,

Little office clerks, working and quietly, not saying the loud part out loud. Everybody is gaming a kind of metric relationalism, or are they in unison of this mawkish pleasure principle, or this satisfaction of teleology of desire?

Everybody has it, the pretensions of acting normal that this relationalism of direct response metrics that let us understand each other's status, status is always relationalism, scarce powers that shim and shimmer amongst the waves of our streams of consciousness that show priorities of importance that guide the intuitions, and into the structure of friends and enemies, attractions and repulsions. Even the complex rationalisations that will be justified.

All for the point, for that sweet, sweet interruption of monetised ads.

Right between the points. Between the relations.

I look back at this media theory By seth, Then wonder.

( Worth another relink )

Pagliacci Syndrome of Ikigai

Since a product and service, from the feudalistic aristocracy (Kingdom/Owner) and bourgeois industry revolution. (Worker/owner), time moves with the scientific management, unintentionally or not

Pagliacci broke his performance to shoot a heckler which reminded him of him being cuckolded, or, so I mishear, the story. Are they times when through the emotional labour.

When will our design of Ikigai of understanding the teleology, this framework of qualia that brings use to a desire, is acknowledging our enormity.

The enormity of the algorithm and mindless, incomprehensible. Apparently I'm dripping in and out of theists with the substack dive with an 'ontological activist'. In and out, refreshing, and I know it has a problem. Something about it attracts me since the hustle of Bluesky is, too, impersonal.

Do they distinguish between Inauthentic artifice of our craft and our own, backstage selves with put off the mask? ( oop, almost doxed myself there ) The problem arises when authenticity becomes another tool of symbolic capital, and high school sociology.

A western concept of performance, and a teleological concept of self-determination from the east.

This is World needs and good at is where all the salesman is, with the thoughts of what we love doing, to where the desire to kindle the child chaos into the adult order.

How to put on a face to show a self on this blog, and then pull it off when I put it off. Foundherent back and forth, of sincerity and sociological interaction, is that of a community with the mask of my own self that I show to the world.

Look at the crazy take on self-determination, it's not the reductionist one on financial drive.

Oh, there's an edutainment, jokey one on creative mediocrity by Cuckfucies, of absolute mental illness specificity, take that entertainment.

"In 2025, the term “creator” is a near-sacred word.

Every kid wants to be a YouTuber. Creative work is in some way the new White Collar. The dream has evolved from Fake Easy Email Office Job to Meaningful Expressive Creative Job.

With such a value premium placed on creativity and artistry, a parallel ecosystem of discourse has arisen:

Discourse *about* creating, discourse about the *type of person* who creates, and so-on. This post is technically part of that discourse.

A definition:

Creativity **** is any post, video, or essay *about* creativity in the abstract."

I do like the unannounced

WHUUUUUUUUUUU DAR with his own creation.

The comedy is finished!

The drawbacks of ameliorations

What a self-flagellating spectacle.

Do better

Do better

Do better

Or is it status? A relative appeal? Scarcity or Connection?

"I nominate "do better" as the year's most irritating phrase. It's just so ______ entitled. _____ sitting around open jawed expecting content to be spoon-fed into their mouth, and then it's not exactly conforming to what they want, they complain from a pseudo position of higher morality. ____ off." @robmanual

Some British bloke I got from my feed.

I have to agree from the sentiment.

What's the case with the amount of social media wanting a better return of its direct response, what it takes to make it with business models, non-profit and such with the cost of living in contrast of the perverse incentives of social medias audience with publishers looming in the back.

Become a resource or not. Well, I dipped my toes in the pundit circuit and with that, with my own socialist leanings, they are not going to learn. With their own path, Can't reach everybody.

I'll leave this unedited video now

anti-synth-work

Work giving labour to another or to yourself, physical or cognative.

Yet the netural, it happens, with the schedule wether it goes or not.

Even with this one.

The performance continues.

With each tip of typing this, the montony and banality of a copywriter one once where unfurls the a moment of yearning for connection.

Then it returns in of itself.

Tautolgys sticking, tautolgys going.

Public domain, the rawest expression of the commons

 What the means to express oneself and to express the freedom to expression!

Out it goes, and knowing no means of axiology to predetermine itself and form a solid idea, yet. We form the bumps together.

This leads us to our own ways on interchange of ideas and play, so that it is.

Non-binding, primitive, there's no a-prior property right, only when it's revealed and the declaration is done.



Bonus Link
Tragedy of the commons. Pah. More like magic

Sapiosexual/Demisexual

Cognition and Emotional.

Logos and Eros.

Expression of Philosophy/intellectual cogency and the emotional bonding of intuitions.

Such is a manner of identifying with the continuing expansion of the taxonomy of sexual attractions towards understanding the performance of self.

With that, that merely shows that with the commodifying of community and queer theory with the expression with of ones own sexual identity is a manner of understanding if any of these labels serve, I'm lurking again within more of the ethics of substack, and it's a matter of time to understand new ways to talk with others.

There are a lot of images, either generated or and I'm getting less phased to condemn or endorse, it simply exists.

Thanks queer theorists, thanks non-elitist philosophers. They still keep asking questions and non-questions. Until I go back to work.

Here's a really cussy edutainment piece, with functional philosophy definitions btw, relinking it.

Response rate for all the wrong reasons, the hustle cycle.

 

Disorganised poem

The first thing that comes up

the High response rates of porn

then when wonder why

everybody is doing it.

then why does it or tautology romance

does not entail

the most profitable stuff

that such we do

no lampshading it

Funnel

Seo

Don't rock the status quo or entertainment

follow the leader

follow

repeat

what

will

happen

to

my

business?

what

is

the

mechanics

of

exchange

and

set

price?

What

is

STATUS?

Status, compete, scarce already, numbers game, hidden.

Monopoly

pretenders

appreciate the hack who does not

and the hack who does

well

they come.

On Slurs

(Vulger cw) Oh have this non-disney scribble.

Yugopink and wowmao, I still pop in, as a sociologist to check qualitative status signals and in-group out-group dynamics, this is good video.

Bimbo used to be racist, now used by sex workers as copyrighting to commodify their bodies, go figure.

The absurdity of superiority, of the simplest of hierarchy of wanting to fit in within what is to be picked by a community or the way these groups govern informally, of trying to push for a group cohesiveness. With such a manner though with all mob rule, with the weight of the slurs and the hollowness of them, then it's from history that barbarity that core is held to together.

Hustle-archy, With the need of structure for a conscious

Due to the quick moving shapes outside in the parks there's this kind of Status role assigned and explicitly and semiotically through the signalling and conduct of Hustle of the status role of money cool money or old money.

The status quo, gets to be that way by travelling under the radar, sight unseen. Unconsciously, becoming the status quo ante. It's not an announcer.

Do they do tailing and all with all that subculture.

Try not be to cynical with that.

Was reading the Tyranny of Structureless of what may happen. By Jo Freeman. Thx Feminist literature.

New Year, Self update and thoughts with Grandad. (Bonus Fave 3s)

Still taking pics of myself, with seeing if I can get a hernia treatment

He's alright, he's resting well with physical treatment doing well. Can't complain with the amount of chocolate that's come in with the off-brand oreo cookies. All part of the life of the Petit boug.

Darn, even unimportant. Feel less hustled than playing the latest video games to game social media

Wow, what's this?

Favourite Youtube Essays bonus!

1. Alexander Aviles : How Corporations hijacked the Anti Ai Backlash 

2. Fd Signifiers : Sinners and the Death of Black Art
3. (Challenger of another view) Peter's Coffin on Bomberguy - On elitism

Fav Podcast

1. Structuralism & Marxism (feat. Nicolas Villarreal) Emanicipation podcast

2. Neitzhe and the left Emancipation Podcast

3  Why Scientists Can't Rebuild a Polaroid Camera [César Hidalgo]

 Fav Substack essays

1. Knifestack: The death of the copywriter

2. Andy Masley : The Ai water issue is Fake

3. Devon Halliday : My Literary Fiction is more literary Than Yours

Fave Edutainment

1. CJ to the X : That Time Disney Ruined Kiki's Delivery Service

2. Flazefire : Twitter Artists (and why they're hated)

3. Corridor Crew : I turned my friends into living Toys

Holiday of TTS errors

 SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHGHHHH

That was the word of Jesse. Or santa mc crank smile during some texts and speech as he moves towards a smile.

SHHHHHHHHHHHHJUUUURR

It's still mindless, its still going, yet, charity is what i give it, i don't litigate.

Ah, text to speech, you've still got ways to go in the 1990's. 

Now more cleanly and more waywardly, some errors still show, and how I interpret.

Sometimes bumbling, sometimes incoherent, times poorly acted.

Yet still, it obeys.

Other than that, normal. (I wonder how this speechify subscription will pay off.)

Against Eliminative Materialism

cognitiuum

A post confirming my deontology towards machines that eliminative matierilism of the golden mean

By a former Gamergater?? Whaa? (I haven't checked is opnion on that, don't come at me.

Calling him a gamergater (was he?) is a Ad hominin. So it's not related.

Found various arguments that i found nonsensical, even through pundits with other positions don't agree with. ( Eliminative materialism of consciousness being the one. Violates my deontology. Trying my best to not tamper with the golden rule. 🛋🎗)

I keep finding the fundamental presumption indefensible, such as cryptography (such as a trans getting hrt over it.) along with that this is going to stop.

So yeah, there's a polarization problem, escalation. This is coming from the reactionary populists from the liberal side, they say internationalism matters. Well, functionalism does too, thank you very much.

I do believe a mind exists, contingent of material/physical conditions, I'm constructing it right now with descriptive.

That's enough of that, time for entertainment.

Well well, got bible cloes, business Brad, Hustler Hag and Driver Dan.

These are the archetypes that I pass through that I'm not directly naming due to the ways of trying to read people I disagree with on substack.

Another for the ideas.

Hustle-trance/Overpayment scam alert

 Could only draw this impression of something. Welp, 800$ in order to get a 'refund' with a fake paypal. With a hustle of a discord, voice chat urging me on. With that plausible deniability, doing the barest minimum to get away with it.

Sombody tried to hustle me with the easiest scam in the book, prerentious playbook, so i switched back into serious character and blocked and reported.

Say no to spammers.

Well, I shall call the new hustle-trance, this is from herd morality. Taking it from that concept, and with the entitlement complex of profit. Got that from the liberal seth.

Status and Culture

 

Even out of the bounds of our epistemic enterprise of our academia, the main road's status motivations, and incentives still persists.

" Everybody is fishing for status, let nobody tell you otherwise " some Dragon Odendo, altered quote, probably. Well, Transcend, for that matter. By junction of there engagement. Social is the proceeding semiotic of economic, that's made of exchange value and set - price. Price, meant to stop haggling by the Quakers.

After the price and the exchange, there's the use value of the physics and mechanics of the things produced, artisan craft on the things of those who own their conditions of labour.

So Status, Rigour (sometimes that happens in academia, to and not.) Pretending not what other people do.

Status is a invisible ruler that effect to our micro decisions. From scarcity, to our abundance.

Other concepts i picked up 🛋📖 ( from the status book, author comes from fashiony background. )

Kitsch/Avant garde distinction

Epigone, in art of imitation, Exemplar by Immanuel Kant

Newmania:

Seeking the new cool thing on microblogs.

New = not exactly better, since to desire to see new entertainments via media.

Hysterisus :

Lagging behind in Greek, etymology. Used to describe another phenomena of trends in the data.

That's personal definitions n note. Possible to change.

Quite the sensation of how it's organised, with it being abstract of s

The land of no boundaries of business guru maxims

 This vision were all the matter. 

With mass advertiser. Goes into the hustle trance.

The way of the machine zone of playing an eternal economy game of physical pleasure/pain, all the complexities between. With the emotional ways and emotional states, compared to the physical states.

Then I'm trying to clamber for an extension, then I'm not, getting substack posts via business gurus, are well, people who happen to keep working, it's all the advice of people who keep workings

How is the motivation doing, self-industry complex? Any benefit? You don't have to follow any of this advice if you don't have a problem. They are nebulously reaching for better within the void of extrajudicial lands.

Thanks, I guess, then there's that phrase in snarl quotes.

Personal brand, not caring about strangers. Guess that's the confirmation a publisher does using the legal fiction. With what a publisher does after all the labour is all collected, his personal value judgement is there.

I can't blame that kind of mindset, if he's running an independent, giving free advice if it does not work or not.

At least you're not selling anything, bud! Well, bought into this.
Took your test on your blog.

Such entertainment 🛋️💭

There you go, into the sunk cost of getting a book deal (or not) I know you're trying to help. With words of authenticity cropping up again (Illusionist entertainers aren't), then it's the reason this will go.

Where will you stop with the how-to roulette? Reverse engineer.

Well, continue on with your generalities.

(You could consider pablum, what do you think?)

This one's fascinating though, creator economy he's coined? Idk, this may be what publishers give a sunk cost to creatives (Petit boug) Who happen to build their labour of signals of distribution.

Have some more, Philosophy wannabe. Signalling is talking about semiotics? I'm still reading that Umberto eco book with all the academic reading.

He's a slow-down kind of man, I'm a stay-in-sync-with-yourself-man

Solving problems? I like to give my characters problems.

Well good sir, good going on a sunk cost. 🛋️👍 Like I am.

"Stay Sovereign" Was the email.

The internal theater of angry visions

Fuming. It happens, its ephemeral, only in an instance of any newsworthiness  buzzwordiness of each celebrity passing.

That impression.

Obsession and pretension over porn interests while keeping NSFW porn intake under wraps. Then they return to the popularity contest. Macro scale, impossible to control.

Pretend is to claim/demand etymological, everybody's a critic, everybody's a reply man.

Oh, How I desperately need to curate it all, How I need responsibility.

So my algorithm ( ha ha, they say there's none, fire hose is an algorithm ) bubbles and filter.

Thanks workplace. Time to self-regulate again.

Holiday of convention convenience. Or on the arc of justice.

I hope Grandad gets the card.

Look at all those presents and pleasantries. I need family, actual family. Not a family that's found, or showing up, well. There's a book for that now, so many specificity I can get to.

Happy Holidays!

Second order effects / Human rights / List of Philosophy

Oops, social media all status roles, I must return to be academical shell and see if I can see enlightenment.

This is my Ecosia gamification stats, by the way, that's positive externalities.

 That's the alternative of Consequentialism.

Categorical. Be it with opinion of citizens, or enforcement of institutions.

Oh, Oh will be putting this from emancipations  For current marxist academic theory, well, it's got plenty of podcasts and others.

Whatever the intention falls. Does not matter to a consequent along with it's spreadsheets.

I got this from this philosophy list, that's a load thing to add to a list or not. For beginners/intermediates wanting a refresher of the moral principles.

Is this too western, though, too American? Welp, Other than open university, beats having a wrong microblogging education.

Poem - Planets align

When the planets align.

When they are physically connect.

Then maybe.

Things are seen in a new way.

When they do.

Doom or Boom.

To our town.

Will come and go.

 

Net neturality felt prosumer, refuted.

This is the aftermath, of a post I picked up by a Marxist-Leninist Anime Girl, who was right.

• The net-naturality felt like it was a pys-op by Netflix.
  
  @naijeieoas Dec 14, 2017
  
  "They uh… they could do this before the NN scare and they never did. Even with the rules in place they still track you with packet injections.It has actually *never* been about getting charged for social media, because companies could always do that too and they haven't. Not that Comcast is innocent in this, since what they were charging for Netflix's access certainly hasn't been lowering the cost of service or building out better infrastructure. The price I'm paying them now for a whole 3 MB/s down should be criminal.
  
  Long story short, #NetNeutrality is a scam by tech companies to go after ISPs for eating into their profits and you're all being duped by these scare tactics.Latest take I saw today was that if NN was repealed, then how would “families with multiple children” be able to afford Internet access. 😂Who in the world is delusional enough to think wired ISPs are going to be able to charge per user, as if that's even technically feasible.
  
  Most wired ISPs only see a router anyway. There was a time (way before NN was a thing) when some of them didn't like home users using a router, but the routers came with MAC address spoofing to get around that problem and the ISPs could do literally nothing about it.So they stopped caring. And besides, do people really not realize how expensive it is *now*? I'm a single person and Comcast has been $60–$80 the whole time I've had them, for 3 MB/s down! Hell I get better speeds for only slightly more on my phone!NN rules have had (___) ALL to do with the actual pricing of websites or ISPs. They've always been able to charge anything they've wanted. The FCC rules never changed that. All NN says is that an ISP can't charge extra for access to a website (which they never did to end users)
  
  I will keep yelling that the origin of the current situation is Netflix whining about having to pay Comcast for data center access and making a big political issue out of it so it didn't eat into their profit. Everything else is ahistorical, metaphysical, emotional appeal."
  
  
  This is, of course, related to their side of the inter-bourgeois fight called net neutrality, they being the first to really push the idea that it has anything to do with end users. In reality, they simply don't want to pony up any revenue to the companies servicing this traffic.

Monopoly-capitalism (not a lack of “net neutrality”) is rearing its head in information–mass media infrastructure.

"Net neutrality got taken away when the ISPs were commercialized. All the “fast lane slow lane” rhetoric in the world hasn't stopped the commercial ISPs from charging way too much for access. “Oh but they charge too much for all bits equally!” FOH 

Most people don't even know what QoS and network traffic shaping are (and how much they're used on today's Internet) but will still cry about “treating bits equally”. It's such a liberal trap like “free speech” but even communists are taking it at face value.

It all started when the well off middle class people realized they might have to pay slightly extra for Netflix because the large ISPs are competitors in that market, then got morphed into some dorky human rights campaign. Staaaaaaahp."

"I will never forgive this nation for making such a big deal about net neutrality but not about poor infrastructure or monopolistic ISPs."


The inter-bourgeois conflict of “net neutrality” is trending again. She goes. Link

Then, in 2020, she moved away, went to another plane of existence. Thank you for enlightening me and stopping me being so twitter brained with American spectacle. (You don't have to agree with the ideology, btw, )itass commercial polarization meant to sell you of prosumer activism. 

I must continue with my sociology.