Radica, UBI, Foundherent / Right to to city tube feed

What's on the marxist labour theory of value tube today?
What's on the woob tube? I'll keep editorial control here and commitments.

In Couch Gregor attempts to have an opinion on statecraft. See this as the research scrapbook where I draw inspiration on where to fictionalize.

BadMouse, some say he's gone ideological shopping, I'd say he's become foundherent with the syncretism that we currently reside. I don't think his ML videos fully hit the mark, some still believe in it like the Finnish Bolshevik, I'm not. Can only wish the anarchist well as he goes his merry way with my own liberal to Ancom 

Really, it's all a journey, ain't it? I'm not like I have anything else to lose in these unauthorized.

Guess this is the alternative to the copyright, which require virality of exposure and advertisers within a computational prospecting for attention economy these days.

Tbh, Welfare > UBI, it's still too much of a libertarian idea even if it's tried in Ireland.

So this is the idea of the right to the city, well, that's the policy of decommodification along with the state-craft to be taken, do recommend following this chap.

These are all policy changes though, radical systemic changes that sow the seeds to the creeping, changing urbanism or our society that are meant for the community action. Be it for the quiet revolts that happen underneath this domain.

So with these contradictions that will form, they will happen, the foundherent resolving as these hierarchal, horizontal alignment of distribution. Wonder what Finnish Bolshevik is doing? Oh, Talking about dialectal materialism theory and atheism.

I wonder if I'll keep following, haven't gone through his body of work fully.

The amazing atheist happened to drop a video, and he was an opportunist, I decided to check out that video in the bibliography, it was edgy calling Sargon a pick me grifter. Honest with Thunderfoot and his Anita whining. Welp, Thank you for trying to do a cogent video.

Only I respected Daniel Dennet.

What's happening on 1dime? I watched this long-form essay, everbody is splitting off again.

Ah, Marxism, it may have disinformation or not.
Thanks anway 1dime, you may be called a liberal, yet I know doing edutainment for the masses could be a thing, even if some argue it's a stepping stone.

Now, here's the question, am I Marxist? I'm an entertainer first, not a fighter. Yet I know conflict theory has influenced many an action flick and provided tension, that's with Aristotle theory of the unity of opposites is.

Foundherent will be within the label though of what I do, into socialism.

So yeah, dialectical materialism only a means of anaylsis.

A solution for Ai-identity, Anti-trust Egalitarian. Links.

Rawwr Kyro is doing his ranting here with notes on Tech Journalism.(If you're new, check out my other notes on AI and licence in the search bar)

I must do this the strawman to feel carthesis to my audience.
(image from Deja 98 Rom hack)

MuH FREEDOMS'n HuSTle'n  Propyright rights MICKY MOU- 

CRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCNCCCNCN Free Palestine! (Thats the thing, ain't it? It's not so simple as a dunk tweet or a microblog post It merely entertainment right?)

Let me clear some conceptual confusion.

A little petering out with News, welcome to journalism. It could be going completely public domain as things go on. The denialism and copyright self abnegation a defeatist dead-end, especially with the copyright-lets-be-under-the-kind-monopoly-of-disneys/nintendo-content-id-drm sort. I feel like I'm talked down like a child by westy liberals.

As copyright there to consolidate the distribution into capital.

‪@tentacle.expert‬

"SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"

 Aaah doctrinaires'n the anarchists, what to do. Always leaning in the sympathy of the Anarchist. Nightmare, asymmetric enforcement. What will happen when DRM and the commodification of scraping by big content will do? Will I'm not affiliated with that union like Lenin was. Class character first.

Are people in for a rude awakening once this DRM is applied?

Also, ain't Eddy Zetron and his bubble narrative bogus? NFT =/= Prosumer Gen Ai. Well, I've never listened to him anyway. He's still wiggling Coe? Meh.
...

(Now that I thnk about it, encruddificaton seems more like a absurd concept, even when I wrote about it. My hypocrisy alarm bells of a contradictory axis are going off. The only thing he's doing this is for his self-service now.)

I'm using my right in the editorial that hes... infamous grifting. The nft/genai comparison has done so much damage to the discourse. I've written about

Oh, he's got a diaper burping fetish, at least with my entertainment I put it under the legalese that it's fiction.

He's name-searching and sending petty malpractice insults. Why is he the prophet and gospel to anti-ai dogma?

I'm outta there!

Well visual media has its own drawbacks, cartoon discourse ain't conductive, and it ain't hiding the malpractice of the dog piles I'm seeing on Bluesky I don't know why I'd say this. I'm not going to answer the dismissive hustling, it's not for me. Such is a mob rule and the wilful disinformation now.

"Just let me work! Anything. Desperate. Make me silly mindless entertainment. Do whatever specification you want sire, anything to serve! I want job. I need to prescribe as-written instructions"

Texas sharpshooter Fallacy anyone with this discourse with the talking points refuted?Does microblogging facilitate it. It's why I don't post some of these blog posts there. The biggest danger is that the discourse and comprehension they are getting are from a meme, and that's the discourse now.

Twitter and bluesky have destroyed discourse so that's, why I try to limit myself, it's indulging in the techmonoplitic manipulations that Neil Postman warned about in amusing ourselves to death.

Please, denialism and hustle ain't going to answer this question west, expertise going to lead ahead. "It's boring and it will go away!" Nope. I learned with the NFT stuff that this stuff is still present.

Oh, Even now, it feels like excuses to hustle more.

Even with the crash, will it be lose-lose (that's how a doomerist views it, I take it as neutral continuously.) 

This article goes into the prosumer, marketing terms design for direct response and says these are statistical inference.

Or not, this site says it's within the reach of knowledge and the emergent intelligence, or it's Inference of curational decryption matter. Arg.

Link on don't be a A**hole of impossible principle and ideals. By my reflection of this thread on Tumblr. Paternalistic inspiration P*** will not be tolerated within my platform.

I'm going to check the nuanced AI feed and do check out the for you feed too which is better than the discover feed too.

(Oh, I look and try and digest takes) Such as this retweet. I don't retweet in bluesky because of the fickle followers. You are one of the good ones though, who can trust an editorial and an opinion and not a short, quippy and wrong dismissal. I'm entertaining Neil Postman's amusing ourselves to death when I'm using that format.

‪@eleanor.lockhart.contact‬
another thing people don't realize when they fantasize about "the AI crash" is that you're going to see a *lot* more slop and harmful use of AI whenever the big companies do crash, because the crash would drop GPU prices drastically & make cybercriminals etc. training models much, much cheaper"

Oh, that is an idea with all these marketing predictions, something to take account for a preparation.

According to this Test which I felt it was polarising and misrepresentative, I entertained it again. Did my own Ai-identity, which reflected my one and only position. You're free to take it.

Many takes on the thread.

Another Typology as an intuition pump to understand this.

Find myself in agreement to this.

Now as Anil Dash with his own decentralised AI models that are plural, is it forbidden of Green version? Remix culture'n all that I lean on.

He even linked to the video, antitrust leads to trust, I take it.

Welp, Good luck with that with Really Good AI. Kyro will do what he does, Squashinghe west military industry complex.

I'll prepare for a new doomerist movement. I'm not going to associate with this anti-vaxx that's left coded, it's malpractice. Not much vision for the future other than the eternal present. This will cause hijacking and destruction.

‪Key 🗝 🦊‬ ‪@keytryer.net‬· 2d
Current anti-technological trends have no imagination of what the world looks like after this. They want an eternal y2k and an artificial ban on computation. "It doesn't matter if you cure cancer, if no one can be a doctor anymore." It's bleak to me.

Unless we build an alternative.

There will be, as an antitrust egalitarian I propose a right to the city

oh look my EFF stickers have arrived

Regardless, the discourse has regressed on Bluesky. Thank you for reading my rant.

Copyright = Monopoly/Monopsomy Rights

repeat the laws bopkin cappy, of the hedonic treadmills, of the race to the bottoms the law of the cruds

State-Sanctioned with the monopoly of force, that's a hierarchy. A scale of might that is either a service or hindrance.

The monopoly/monopsony of distribution, from publishers to celebrity/influencer. Choke point of ads. The market of trademark.

Techmonoploy, is the monopoly of acceleration and convienance, stuff that fastens our life within urbanisation one water is distributed.

All this ecomics and lines work in unison, with the phantasms of divergence.

Jawboning and a Retrospective of facing the mob

Skull for memory, No reference. Continuing the diplomacy or discourse of AI, well, On here atleast.

Have you watched Alex Avile and the backlash to the backlash to the backlash? Welp, you are in it right now, I've been trying to build bridges. I'd recommend you watch this before you become here.

I must commend Alex for not taking his video down, this odd collusion of hollywood conservatives that are hijacking and destroying movements needs to be noted.

(Cw, human rights rambling from a tired couch. Including a bit of a socialist analyst) Aaah, The defeatist, misrablist dead end of copyright, if Harlen can call them the 7th circle of hell with publishers, maybe I can place a spicy opinion here.

 Silence is capital, another monopoly, when everybody is trying to build trust on the internet, the editorial confessions roll out. Along with the drab examination of the liberal centrists who'd happen to defend the private proporty relations from consolidating commidy value, oh, such a thing that you could state

Journalists don't owe the entertainment media pr any slack. Alex Avile self-publishing that Nickles group disclosure. With such is the diplomatic to the copyright maximalists that he got crudded on. It's always a game, troll bait, and a hornets nest that does not have. He did not sign a non-disclosure deal unlike those of the copyright alliance did so he did a community service.

There's something awfully centrist with publishers wanting to consolidate the means of distribution then raise the commodity value of art, really? Is that the culture industry, I do commodity fetishism

From Deepdreamnights, a public domain artists.

"The anti-AI side isn't actually anti-AI, they're pro-regulatory-capture-of-AI-by-Megacorporations. The copyright anti-AI argument conveniently leaves it open for Disney, Warner Bros, Nintendo, Sony, the RIAA, all to make their own AI systems to lower their production costs, because they own more than enough material to make powerful datasets.
They get it, you don't, worst of all possible worlds."

imsobadatnicknames2

It was actually a very thematically important foreshadowing arc setting up the Online Artist Community™'s tragic descent into the very thing they sought to destroy (people who want to expand the digital mechanisms to enforce the concept of ownership of .jpgs)

So yes, in light of this new info, I'll be keeping a meter at the CYA copyright enforcement that will only entail a unsafer internet. It's there to empower publishers, not the artists.

‪xormetric‬ ‪@tentacle.expert‬· 08/01/2024
SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. Who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"

There are plenty of rights more important than copyright, freedom of expression is one of them, including the freedom to assembly and to protest. Yet it's alarming, so I'll keep a head low her and be sure to differentiate the western artists from the lower working classes.

It's why I've not been posting much, there are absurd paranoia brewing, and it's getting bleak, so sense of discussion as there no's certainty on this issue. Odd activities like Style phrenology along with echo chambers, doing research on this topic like it matters, people need to know the community service of Couch Gregor.

Yet this dirt-digging and wild speculation of ad-hominins only means that they're creating a spectre of free like Nintendo does with its own copyright, only that will understand that this time it's left everybody on the statecraft map in disarray.

I'll leave out with another quote retweet. It's a understatment that this DRM enforcement is going to accidentally be the most second order pro-ai, the bad pro-ai move that's going be, a worser regime overall.

So freedom of expression > copyright, the publishing script puts too much in the hands of publishers and record labels.

‪@valkyrie.hacker.gf‬
Follow
we're literally going to get mandatory DRM brain implants at this rate


B-Bonus retweet.
Erica "digifox" Kovac

I feel weird being in the "middle" on the AI Argument. The hype machine is out of control, but the anti-AI crowd is almost as crazy with the only redeeming quality being that they have very little control over anything.

I think that generative AI is anywhere from "a cute toy" to "mildly useful in limited contexts" and that Big Tech companies did nothing wrong in training genAI models the way they did because a stricter reading of fair use would risk disallowing many types of transformative work.

I think that the way it's being deployed by the hype-mongers is frequently irresponsible and sometimes deliberately attempting to provoke backlash. I think the long-term destabilizing impacts are minor compared to the overreaction dynamics at play currently.

Like the video model demo from OpenAI recently where they generated a fake closed circuit video of Sam Altman stealing GPUs from BestBuy or w/e seems like it must've been calculated to spook people.

  (My response to the hype mongers is well, sex sells, for better or worse.)

Ted Underwood‬ ‪@tedunderwood.com‬· 55m

Based on social media, you might think the US was in the middle of a Butlerian Jihad. But IRL neither party has shown much appetite for regulating AI; universities aren't trying to ban it; content industries are adapting to it. The venting is anti-correlated with change.

This is why no one is writing 10k words a week to counter Zitron's ~10k words about the uselessness of models, inevitability of collapse, &c. You don't need to write 10k words every week arguing that the moon should continue to orbit the earth. People who like the moon's orbit can chill.

I look at Alex Avile for speaking the truth, yet the Tailism of other entertainers along with the inanity of media monopolists. Those who consolidate the distribution. Means That one should always caution with publishers being friendly, there is already an agonise going on.

Thoughts on Andy Masley: the principle of nuance

(Since I've decided that economic downfall is going to continue to get more incredulous, I'll decide to do my own research. More commentators are referring to "Bubble" in quotations.)

(I guess, even with the pre-conceptions and fundamentalists view I'm not a fundamentalist btw, I'm going to leave this one, hopefully they'd use this info reasonably and responsibly. As I'm typing this there are more commentary on the Sora video thing that I'm not going to further comment, not my job.)

Noting and responding to these events is what journalist does with editorial control. Seeing another silly spectacle of narratives in the west always baffles me as I try to evaluate one of the hobbyists here.

Hmmmph, Yep, not going to pop according to this Reuter's article, yet, I know it has not done honest reporting before, yet I trust it here (There was an reporting error within another geopolitical thing that I forgot.)

Okay time for another opinion piece, non-fiction, yep I only write for those who don't tire of it. TBH, nobody on microblogs can read this long anyway, so this is a tactical choice on my part.

This is better at envisioning concepts of the current discourse of AI, thanks, I'll take that positioning axiology. Another collection of notes as I research this technological determinist.
( This is according to him, I'm copy-pasting it. So that there is a clear discussion. )

Written before with my journalism that it's all about seeing what I can do to help out.

That's what copyright is btw, a state-sanctioned monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us. Yes, that's what I do with siding with the creative commons in terms of keeping the internet an open host. So it's a statecraft decision to say that it empowers publishers/publicists too much. Treating them as arbiters, not punishing them.

Copyright is the stuff publishers take from us when we go viral with a book deal, taking 95% percent of the profits once virality hits randomly, that's piracy! (Spoke like Bopkin Cappy there.) It's a publishing right, not a creative right like freedom of expression and assembly.

Yet here we are, having to pick allies, or be passive with this reading.

This propertarian manner, though, I have to reject it. An ascension
on of such a legal fiction to a creative rights will have to do.

I've been trying to build bridges with diplomacy, because y'know what entertainers do is to not send death threats and continue to host a world of wonder. Guess those who serve of giving up their copyright to publishers have put me on the naughty block list, or I'll guess they'll do what I want with toxic positivity, statecraft correctness. I'm in complete agreement with Andy these discourses have become too erm, skirmish for me to keep track.

Andy Masley, despite having loose connections to 80,000, seems to have sensible takes within AI Better than any YouTuber. Could be an appeal to origin to point that he points to vegan posts over there. Needing the foundherent reason for things as things get syncretic, wooo! What a time.

I'll have to fight for my autonomy within certain talking points that invade even the most reputable sources, stuff that I cannot trust now. (Water is a silly metric.) Could honestly do a libertarian socialist solution to all this ai-talk.

Youch, Look at those numbers.

Somebody wrote that the left (or, what I call the troglodyte left, or derogatory slur left) is built on performative bullying (Callout culture) and smug certainty (String Theory like what physicists say), Yet this subject still has that, non-certainty. So take that for what you will, it's only found on Twitter.

We're going to have to be diplomatic, or ignore it entirely. No point at romantising 2022 or even before NFTs, as with things, they're not so simple as a twitter 140 character count.

( I'll look at AWAY are we art yet Tumblr and see if I can get back to you, and I've been following Fox Key as my news man and takes on AI to stay updated. )

Deciding to not associate with anti or pro, or synth, I merely keep tract because to pick a side could lead into some opportunistic hurdles. However, I still resonate
with the existential naturalism that I had during my atheist days, (still do) so now reading and commenting on such blogs, it's been helpful thought fodder.

Bonus bonust link

He did one on data centers

I'll be keeping track of the info with this podcast on analysis with, Sam Harris?? Oh, he ain't ranting about muslims, hmmph. Welp, will document. It's called the last Invention.

I may describe myself as a Preparationist, i had the Misrablism of Doomerism in this discourse.

For the sakes of interpretation, This visualisation model includes all interpretability of the models with explanations. Well, all reinforced that this lacks free will with pre-determined indeterminacy going into a gradient descent of probability.

https://bbycroft.net/llm

You're a nuanced reader, aren't you? Well, there you go. Yet as I learn this, I'm going to go deeper.

Also, Philosophes debate consciousness of machines, like the materialist conception of the qualia.

Subsumed by exchange Realism/nonrealism, Depressive Hedonism

 Guess this is a frank confessional on state-craft. Examining ideologies and then moving back into diplomatic entertainment. This will be the most labelist piece, and all these are not to be pressures as I circulate through the ideological forces around my time and place.

DIPLOMATIC ENTERTAINMENT, even that has contradictions, don't you see? Yet here we go with another narrativising pull. As a host! Yet State-craft opinion is something for those who never tire of it.

Play this while I type, shall we?

Defeatism, miserablism. And Depressive hedonism. Is that the way of this little book, recommended by Alex Avile? It is all, merely gothic, gothic materialism of fragmented self dwindling in the vastness. I dig it. I've had to ameliorate with looking into the darkness and bringing the stuff out of me.

There's a lot to appreciate here, If I can skip the talks of Stalinism/Marxist Leninism then it's pretty good of capturing the mass media cultish zeitgeist that predominates our lives as capital is made to social, then it's returned in that of a realist mindset as everything is reduced into an exchange value of such with all the gift ecomonys returning into a questionable mirage.

Everything to be bastardized I guess, Or what was Marc Fischer's goal of acid communism to come up with from such concepts to our ends and desires, of such drab material gothic ends.

Then it goes back again. Yet his quote "It's easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism" Wow, that draws an image within the cosiere circles. They're all hidden away within private accounts of twitter now, 2018 was a way to go.

Well, it certainly shines a light of my own pluralist tendencies and ideological presuppositions. Twitter feels like it's regressed, along with its containment unit of Bluesky, and I'm here, wondering the hours like it shall get along. I keep flipping back and forth of the principles of anarchism and Marxism scroll from the site as things draw around from confessional after confessional, it feels like I'll have to examine all the statecraft structuralisations and introspect.

Now there's tension between the Luddites and the accelerationists with that tension, I cannot relate to the Luddites any more due to the guild failure, since with my own confession like with Harlan Ellison, even guilds and unions can sell out.

Even as a drift on, I'm resonating with Neil Postman's and Mark Fischer's Accelerationist. One that is different, one with technology. Yet now, at this rate, We are to deal with such contradictions as of now.

Why, oh why, do I happen to come, where every artist justifies making money with Michelangelo and Shakespeare commercial plays, that the Mona Lisa was a non-profit project. Oh, such a complication.

1Dime, Badmouse, Finnishbolshevik (A little, one video on libertarian socialist rants), and Burn These books, Noj Rants. I keep reading these statecraft books. I'm not even as I can speak with authority as a drifting fabric on soviet historiography. Undecided as a ponder through, I've still got the society of the spectacle silently judging me as try to incorporate it within the fictional complexities of my artwork.

Thanks for reading. I'll get back to it. Along with the labelism. Your still going to get labelled anyway.

(Oh, and you're wondering why there cannot be between unity, I think of this by Badmouse, could not fully follow him when he left the ml space, yet with the time he's become a libertarian socialist. Welp, that's what ideological primordial souping does to you. Still like his electorlism, and baby vaush video minus the adultism.)

(I don't even watch Vaush, guess a lot of info has been revealed about him that Badmouse was incorrect about, oh well, that's truth value)

Neither Techonopoly of mediamonopoly (That's what copyright is btw, state-sanction monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us), It could be the with the right of the city and with being "A loving resistance fighter", or a diplomatic entertainer. So that we can move past such a pleasure principle and interpassive proconsumerism that we can see our own cycles.

Deep, man. Some concepts to take and give away, was he really pushing for a space-communism? Or was it meant

That's what these stream of consciousness happen though, hypocrisy naturally emerge, then with error theory they are naturally for a better collaboration. Or 'better' means monopoly/monopsomy.


Addendum:

(Further post-edit note, I'm not following Cory Doctorow much now, he's right on copyright yet this time to understand encrudificaiton, it has to go deeper than that when it comes to host service deterioration.)

The Godwin's law of entertainment

A mini-hate letter to Disney and media monopoly.

Hello Entertainment company, who should be boycotted along with still suing over its Steamboat Willie.

Remember something similar, not directly, when it comes to the tastemaker and trendsetter, that's with economy and the strength of joy? Being the centre of the entertainment marked with a mawkish fence sitting, universal appeal, a goofy little grin and a candy of the family friendly comfy. Dangerous statecraft and regime status quo.

Yet you've got hacks when it comes to PR, come on all as it's with a thousand lawsuits bougie investments. Licensing only cares about privatisation of property, making style and then scraping next, what will that silly mind come up with?

Bu-Bye!

 My own comic is under notice and too off-model for you, so I'll guess I'll get away with it.

When mass entertainment and its apologists happen to carry the banality on, a company not related yet affliated with disney must give the audience what it wants.

That's cultural conserve where everything must be contained, the releived for the kiddies.

Welp con-serve, the serve as a service that's made clear.

Servicers of vendors are to be expected, as the hacks from the art.

The great gatsby was written by a copywriter.

 ‪Jessica Price‬ (from Bsky) I'll leave it the retweet here.

 ‪@delafina777.bsky.social‬

I need people to understand that Disney has not been a force for good in decades, if it ever was, and that it’s understanding of stories as a pacifying rather than liberating force rivals Christianity’s.

It’s the First Lady of the status quo, the quelling soft power.

‪"Juan Escalante‬

 ‪@juansaaa.com‬

DISNEY: Wins 5 Emmys for ANDOR, a show about resisting fascism 

ALSO DISNEY: Bends the knee to the federal government and suspends Jimmy Jimmy Kimmel for resisting fascism

Disney, probably better than any other corporate storyteller, has a finely honed sense of exactly how much liberation to season its stories with to make you feel like progress is happening, things are better than they used to be, the arc of history is one of inevitable progress.

That is true on both a micro and a macro level. It’s big enough to let some queer artists, artists of color, artists who wanted to tell countercultural stories, have a little corner of the spotlight. Why not? It’s not going to tank Disney. Have fun!

They can tell their stories and you can marvel that they got funding and meanwhile Disney will help make sure very little changes on a legislative level.

Sure! Have some stories about revolution! Stories that make you feel good, rather than angry. Stories about things getting better.

And hey, even a few that might make you angry, or might not feel good, or might make you question that status quo a little.

The thing is, the Disney pot is big enough that that little bit of spice isn’t going to noticeably change the spice level of the entire stew.

The biggest projects are going to reinforce the status quo, and that’s enough that they probably don’t even need to disavow any of those little projects.

Disney is status quo soft power, the First Lady who listens sympathetically to the children at hospitals dying because health care isn’t affordable, who raises funds for some of the photogenic ones, and you think hey her husband can’t be that bad, look how compassionate and beautiful she is.

Never forget how much faster things would become public domain if it weren’t for Disney. Never forget how it treats its laundry workers. Never forget how it insisted on being the government of a bit of Florida. 

Disney is not going to meaningfully stand up to the powers that be because it’s one.

I think escapism is vitally important to emotional health, and also, I think Disney uses it to make you nod along rather than rebel.

Look, I fell for it a few times and I get it, but in 2025 I need you to know that every giant corporation out there would harvest you for parts of it thought it could get away with it, and most brands are owned by one of those corporations.

And no, it’s not all profit-driven. The idea that corporations are purely rational actors is itself propaganda."

Welp, A legal fiction, a collective popular appeal. Informally, I'll put this by solar sands to help with this. The john lockean concept or monopoly that's bound with the legal framework of copyright, (Makes me sympathetic to the concept of copyleft.)

I'd rather cooperate than compete, yet who's interests here are being served, a utopian infinity of might?

ICYMI here's Solar sand's video on this.

I mean, this is was copys will happen, it will continue, and why I boycott Disney from mid 2016's, Welp, there you go. Visual effect artists are going to have to wrestle with the new teck as the time going forward. Oh boy, I'm going to explain my positioning again.

(The minecraft got a hit, merely shows how small these sectors of the internet are with all these things going on, yet don't worry, I appreciate you reading this.)

So yeah I'll forever be fair in my characterisation of these centrist publishers, the panopticon of direct response rates. Mmm, Still in the building, are they?

Bonus Link!

A writer rants about having there fiction published on the absurd presumption of previous track record, which I agree.

B-B Bonus video, another reason to not trust publishers, is their fans. More unfettered feed from my ID.

Legal terms I've come to terms with.

(Enough gags and the clown suit Back the the lawsuits with Couch Gregor unmasking his deontology.

Thanks, Wikipedia. Well, with a legal perspective aligning one thing at a time. I'm not a lawyer, as the first Sturgeons law. Deciphering the legalese and making sense that's not twitterian. Twitterian embarrassment interpretations shall not cease here.

Serious law lecture, from Immanuel Kant and philosophy, they shall be made.

Sturgeons Law

90-10 of everything his crud, the law of mediocrity. Mediocracy! Well, this is the Law of Slop. The law of Kitsch. Where monopoloys of random monopolys appear, and then the publishers scoop them up, then it all happens again. How do they intersect with the economy, and with choke points.

Habeus Corpus

You may keep the body or so that others can't be compulsively aggressive with crimes of wild passion. Clowns running into the bank with anonymity and death threats with harassment are all a wild passion.

Erga Omnes

The deontological where it applies internally to logically make sense, in order for the conception of consciousness to exist. (Pretty deep and philosophical, I know, abstract stuff about the mind and the phycology I learned as an atheist. )

Internal, ideological consistent, that's duty and deduction for ya.

Deontology adjustments to content ID, learning/access rights. Those don't meat with Kantian second categorial imperative, to be treated like an end rather than a means, with consciousness not accounted for. It's foundherent to law theory.

Cui bono?

Who benefits? Well, finances may not matter in terms of the appeal to motive. Which is a informal fallacy, (Reasons need to be provided for it to foundherently matter)

Appeal to motive where two lawyers and their pay cheques enter within a case does not account for the validity of the case.

Appeal to motive with a grifter like Mike Hearn selling the fitness frog/ab wheel is another matter, though.

De Minimus

Got this from Cory Doctorow's copyright cases ( Although I don't think averages are technically correct) another, Nobody want's to read your *S---* within law. The eagle does not concern itself with flies. Pertaining with minimal things, systemically with the environment. As it contains to structure of the large pictures, which extends to the metaphysics of property and of energy redistribution.

Divine punishment of public perception, Backlash on the backlash.

(Cw: Callousness) In reflection with the other post, thinking verbally rather than visually has really given me a new perspective on this issue.

Sometimes, battle ain't worth it, with the recent witch-hunts I keep seeing.

Nobody wants to hire an abuser. Lifes too short. Against professional entertainment etiquette. Callousness, or disillusionment, regardless, holier than though with such a perception.

I can understand why that'd microbloggers leave an information exchange. PowerPoint, where the discourse is out of context and with screenshots of little things where correlation those not cause causation, with drive-by science.

Micro-bloggers that is in within Twitter and Bsky.

Welp, the masses want their entertainment with this, so it's only this that will fit it. Prosumer as it were, the mass's one that we'll get.

Oh no, I use meme, how ironic, huh? Prosumers man, prosumers.

10 months ago, with its updated journalism defer Alex Avile/Cory Doctorow with regard to the copyright/environment (Andy Masley) and others, I think this was a touchstone from somebody who ain't academic looking from the outside in.
"Aggressively bright light to how hive-minded and dumb" ahh Flazfire.
Anyway, I'm going to be more recluse and not post this on the micro-bloggers.

(Got to give credit, here's the tweet he's referenced)
Why I don't go on Twitter. Or what outsiders looking inside are saying. Is this what trolls think who poison the well? Oh, had to credit the guy here's.
Here's another video that could be, I'm thinking being a visual-minded person having to integrate within verbal thoughts.
Here's a summation of the discourse back in 2012, and it still continues.

It's like the Austin Mconnell video again.

I guess with the moral panic slop I have to wade through, I'll see if I can keep this off microbloggers because of lack of citations. Trucking through incoherence and weirdness. (This ain't bloobergum kind of thing.)

Licensing =/= Conduct

Well, this was the illustration with the publishers.

 https://www.authorsalliance.org/2025/08/26/resources-on-copyright-and-ai-updated-faq-and-position-paper-on-lawful-access-and-fair-use/

Even those for the copyright protections are disagreeing with making style a trademark.

The Idea/expression, internal/external, still needs to be said within literacy.

Stylistic, abstract conceptualisation is going to be even harder.

MMM, Misconduct, is that a philosophical performative statement on use? Don't misconduct? I wonder what it means.

Makes me think of the term Use by Geo

That why I disagree with Philosophy tube's saying with those statements with AI, of investment, if that's such a broad definition, this is a statement of investment. With my Ko-fi 

All return of investments are connected with freedom to access to freedom to choose. Or why I don't go on twitter artist.

.

Thoughts on LLM/Diffusion Normalisation Compilation Ai

Or how I resonate with reallygoodai by Markiplier. Or at least, how this tech merely should remain open-source lest it be corrupted via the copyright industry complex.

Certain comic I'm seeing around, this is my edit, block me if you don't like this. I'll have to defend the right of self-determination against capitalistic entities. It may anger the Anti-ai purists out there. Sorry, gotta portray all my bad ideas sometimes, for better or worse.

Even a idea like that may have to have a truth I'm going to accept, not deny.

Not as bad as the Adobe trying to commodify style to censor everything, though.

 So, apparently, talking points need to addressed again, as I've been getting passionate about discourse, as I try to get out of it, it REELS me right back in! Thanks internet.

(From Flow Tv walking on latex, of soul-searching. )

In faux mercial's don't match the subvertisement of Plug it in by Basment Jaxx, or the fake infomercial by Adult Swim.

Wow, did this predict something or what? That's speculation as this tech develops.

With the in-faux commercials within the demo of Flow Tv, I can see a vigorous editor and visual effects will have to cover it.

It's being introduced into movies such a Dune 2 (blue eyes, I mean, going through Rumor). Yet with every industrial demand for product, the show must go on.

I'm surprised how this fae-like television will be occurring, of course it's Cat-nip for neophiliacs and technologists (good'n bad). Circling all over it like pigs in muck, It's new. As I've gone with Alex and Seth. Some have gone more cautionary, others have embraced like Gabe Newel

With researching all the essays and pundits, I'm going to have to concede, it's better if this stuff is open-source and not in the hands of adobe-Disney, for the increase of learning rights will only lend into more consolidation by monopoly capital.

It's Petit-boug (middle class) to see a Manichean relationship, to submit oneself to a counter-productive content id that It looks like the litigant oneself out of each way, it's trying to own the two-finger Vulcan salute and then making. Does everybody forget the days of all this detectification does? 

With the rise of certain entertainment channels, I'm going to have to accept the fact that neophiliacs are going to eat it up Because it's AI. It will be compounded by the fact that videos are the most expensive art form, with them bound by copyright and licensing laws.

(One of the ai tut sites does star wars IP franchise, I think he likes it with fan art )

Oh, There's a Christian ai video farm, merely going by speculation here with the number and could be wish casting, I think these may lead into other avenues and heavy users/viewers I don't like to think about, stuff that will make this urgh, marketable.

What am I to do with a those who use these tech to make their own livings? I'm not ya dad and my validation will count beyond the reach of this. We live in a society.

Additional to read on the copyright and environment talking points

This is a matter of labour, not the copyright industry complex.

https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2025/04/03/why-training-ai-cant-be-ip-theft/

On the amphibole of use (or the be pedantic, a Syntactic ambiguity )
https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2024/11/15/the-ambiguous-use/

Oh, and there's a bonus post on AI environment if you'd like

https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2024/08/18/is-ai-eating-all-the-energy-part-1-of-2/

Environmental talking points still are the weakest and another.

This 2 hour interview on deep-learning for anybodies who missed it.
These are neural networks, something I've never conceived before.
(Wow, the book is 60 quid long, there's a lot of research with this, along with there being a meta for this of Instagram and all those AI entrepreneurs.)

Another one when a philosopher tackles the ontological question within learning and how it affects others.

Since our questions of intelligence etymological mean to select, it's with the architect paradox with more and less. (That could be a less of a framework with our own worse/better.) I'd only argue the brain ain't like a muscle, merely a stimulation organ. With a stimulus to fatigue ratio not related to tension. Regardless, I'd likely have a good conversation with him.

I wonder how he'll do with Khanmigo and the Khan academy. Not Sam Altman, Maybe Markiplier.

Thoughts...

• Generative AI is a buzzword: It's neural networks and deep learning
  
• So many models now.
• Still think it should be open-source with Aaron Schwartz with the Anti-Fraud. (looked at his documentary, it was moving )
  ( Note, there's a question of it keeping it open source that does not benefit this Ip centralisations/companies, it does open a conundrum, It's going to require the lesson I mention previously. 9:43-13:13)
  
  I'd hold my breath with Capital in conflict, or reconcile with media industry and tech industry. ( Move the needle? Move it for themselves? )
  
• Please conceive of other means of personal ownership and not the private ownership of copyright maximalism, I must ask. 
• This is why I self-publish with all this industry fuff. Grunt work and rote memorisation are being defended.
• All this talk of AI benefits/costs, talk of the bubble popping, has not added much.
• The fact that the copyright alliance attacked a diffusion model because it's Unlicensed is telling.
• "For profit world where slop machine is cheap and human labour is not" Still ricochets in my mind.
  
  
  
  Taking note of this pattern synthesis.

Despite my understanding or misunderstanding, I'll still keep track. Going to check out Moho.

Oh, with all these hours of reading material

Another on the Neural networks and how to understand them, as an auto-complete.

I'll be taking out of bluesky and other sites. No promises to going back to this tension is going to continue.

Conclusion:

Since preconceptions of AI confirmed is such a meta entertainment on microbloggers, I've attempted to adopt an AI ameliorate approach, since attempting to serve it towards IP monopoly landlords cannot be the solution. As with bad actors Hijacking multiple positioning.

Please, I still remain, Ai as open source.

Oh, with this principled distortion with a broad brush and monolith others with scrutiny, as with the reactionary humanist position with Alex Avile, I'll be still keep back as this justifies actions considered extremist, like sending death threats and fantasying about death. Only on micro-bloggers.

Principles, based on a micro-blogherence.

Don't people realise they've already been displaced as freelancers? There has to be an alternative.

See you again, or until I'm assimilated into a borg.

(I've tried to edit this back, that's what happens when you've got no editors)

S***s AI Udemy Review, and other clarifications

(I'll never sketch myself as the nostalgia critic again, and it's not even a coherent expression because it's old stuff, yet.)

Time to describe a bad decision. Following from Seth's Claude Dog Post , I've deliberately postponed this review.

Short version: I've tried my best to not make this an entertainment spectacle by making it into a format video with bells and whistles. Course I took is off-the-mark, and I don't recommend, I then think more about Licence quoting a Cryptography guy and calling it. Due to the illiteracy of licensing, I had to rewrite my TOS.

Longer version

I bought a course by Seth. I'm not convinced with my wabi-sabi tendencies.
I buy it so you don't have to! I'm going through my disagreements and snorting book reviews. Maybe out of parasocial relationship, I've decided to buy his silly course on AI.

Welp, Here are 35 pounds discounted. I could not resist. Most interesting was building a career without AI. Comparing it with the weather and the species like Kevin Kelly. Yet here we go with a another movement I cannot predict.

Then I was recommended of Midjourney and Claude from Seth, and to put it on Youtube, youch. I haven't been into perplexity as it was.

With the ideas here, I'm certain that he's going somewhere here with a workable plan. He had going with something with productivity and value and why others must go and be impresario. A leader and not a follower (ain't that what entrepreneurs do?) Yet, urgh. It's still 85 quid now of this writing.

Axiological arguments of value creation do not apply to a Taylorist Industrialist, by the way, I think he notes that himself, yet that means that with are own urbanism that we are inter-meshed now it's a subject to be explored. That he did within his song of sigificance, 

He then goes into tasks and projects, within how that such a thing will be driven my freelancer cobbler automation and that clients concerned about productivity by the industrialist would as Henry Ford, those are thoughts are another time.

He claims lawyers certain professions aren't gone out of in five years real estate broker, truck driver, a pharmacist, a daycare worker is inconceivably not going to be replaced.

So now I cover with better uses of what techno-domnion and techno-affliation with such a mindless thing, he draws on deterministic free will and Daniel Dennet's Intentional stance. Oh, He also makes a claim that people don't go to Hackneyed Movies from Hollywood any more, I get not courting their opinion. Yet, Disney get's traction.

What can happen with this though is Seth's attraction with determinism as a position compared to Dennet's Compatiblism in regard to interpreting free will when it comes to comparing this tech with autonomy.

I ended up writing the review. (It's going to be licence ramblings from now on. Already done it.

"As a wabisabi illustrator, Independent. The implications of using AI have reached wildfire within anti-ai, I hope copyright cases get turned down because being into creative commons licensing, attempting to out-license it ain't going to work. It's nice to see somebody try to cool the flames down.

It's inevitable that in our times, though, I guess illustrators are either going to embrace or walk the opposite direction.  Impresarios such as us.

I mean, What will happen with disconnection of this day and age. I do hope that there going to be more essays that don't muddy the waters.

Brings me back to Niel Postman's Technopoly, that's such a thing. What the implications with our own designs such as it will pursue the conflicts here. You're thoughts on Henry Ford are poignant.

Thanks."

Got my Certificate, eh, yeah. There's that credentialism that's apparently I have to show now. Ugh, Udemy.

Am I supposed to be proud?

Further notes.

Technopoly out of all the technological books, this felt the most relevant to what's happening today. Even with the last two. This was, despite the disagreement western bias of Cold War terms, eeriey similar to Alex Avile reported on within the second video.

Well, thanks, I guess. I don't think AI-philes will get much, AIphobes will get average with the end with Seth's plan for those who plan to not build their business with it average, cannot fully recommend. He does summarise his ideas in his next post, hmm.

Hmm. Time to revise positions again. Judging from my previous notes.

Considering Steve Klabnick has a similar to mine, with being wary'n technological puritan. Not a Tech opportunist. I'm simply not the industrial bottom line, not Disney, not Nintendo, not King who managed to lay off its employees.

Oh, It's still generative Ai, well that could be a marketing term right now. Now for the last notes.

. Jumping in bed with For-profit companies for content ID is not going to work, a nightmare system as it is. I'd wish they call it copyright infringement, but everything is loaded with RFAA terminology. It is even argued that it ain't the case, the push to make fair use and fair dealings obsolete to apparently control the diffusion models and LLMs. Trying to marketize style will only consolidate power.

Again, licensing tends to encourage monetize/marketerize-or-die kind of logic, which I'm trying to avoid.

. Environment is a loaded gun, none of the essayists or pundits than Alex Avile, fight me on that one. I'd have to limit my micro-blogging after this. Bluesky and Xshwitter aren't going to be deliberately misinformed licensing.

. Education and connections with controlling tech have been noted with Peter Thiel. Along with certain reaction streamers championing it (not all). They should not be taken seriously anyway, anybody who takes thou opportunist ambulance chasers are confirming Neil postman has said about Amusing ourselves to death.

12 minute video, apart from the thing, this is going to move towards a hyperreality. How it is malicious theory to control with aimless categorization and normalisation as the maths cannot be determined by those who preprogram it. I mean Alex Avile has already touched on educational programs who happen to use with the Khan Academy.

This is a question for future generations, and the ones that will come afterwords.

Merely shows how what's at stake here.

Maybe I'm drawing a close parallel to the postmodern villain that Video's Team wrote. Copyright will end with Disney wanting to license our thoughts.

Lets hope for copyright-gate by the sovereign citizen types

(Futurama with that the ad-creep on dreams)

I'm agreement back to Flippo

"Unpopular opinion: the pro-copyright anti-information freedom response to generative AI is reactionary, and it’s bad in all the usual ways reactionary things are bad.
The tech is here to stay. The only thing being decided as a matter of IP law is whether open models will be a thing, or if the big rights holders will get to make a lot of money by licensing proprietary models. As before, I prefer a world where information and tech are free and accessible.
Like, I understand "I don't want to be put out of a job" but I really don't get "I want the tool that puts me out of a job to cost $159.99/mo from Adobe who licenses it from Getty, so I can rest easy knowing it was not trained on anything I made". IP law can deliver the latter, not the former.
Right on cue. Perfectly legal licensed training data. For OpenAI, Midjourney, and Google. Not for open source models folks can hack on and run locally. (If the copyright maximalist doctrine prevails.) All the downside, none of the upside. Yay for copyright!"
He points to this link https://www.404media.co/tumblr-and-wordpress-to-sell-users-data-to-train-ai-tools/

So I pour it, the course and the discourse. I'll leave looking at the AI entertainment channels next time.