Meilorism Vs Specification

Even with all the iterations, syncreticism, and eclecticism of aesthetic ideas with no physical boundaries.

The feedback of the editing practice and process leads down the way to the finish line, something that anyone without an editor can do, something that everybody can accomplish now that everyone can copyright.

To the point that it's enough and that physical shipping leads to the end. Yet teleologically, all accomplishments lead towards another.

Over and under the specification until the consciousness leaves it.

Agnostic non-curation

Oh, so what is it for the irrationality of the fundamentalness of the algorithm? Of prior recognition of a scroll that can be made into madness

I can determine the way it picks up the random matter; that's the definition of random, with no predictable fundamental, absurd to define by design. Fundamental candlesticks require a base.

So with this blind selection of organic traffic, be in it for the deal compared to an institution built around the copyright industry complex.

Once more, a trudge of the non-fundamental epistme of the realm.

Notes on Cosmic dash

These are the first impressions of the webcomic Cosmic Dash.

First Genre analysis 

Rebellion bad/status tragic, thriller/espionage/status admiration good, Action holdout prescriptive morality testing

Archplot – 1 Maru 2 Kracker 3 Dash

Demographic guess (generalising here): early teens - 30. No adult audience here. Psychographic science fiction fans jaded by Star Wars and into Ratchet and Clank media-wise.

1.

. Ai as adversial force was the force here, my personal fave was hal-9000 and Bender from futurama.

. Twist on the mad scientist cliche, the tragic scientist. Bittersweet Kimney could use an additional scene, including bucketbot.

. Amusement park, entertainment, Bucketbot! Comic relief.

. Hive mind got it coming; well, it's a cute act and could lead to more complications.

2.

. Orthos had screen time, along with Kracker

With the empire being the adversial. Sombre with Orthos.

. Package felt macguffiny. The infiltration plot felt more sincere.

. Would of liked to see Kracker develop afterwards. Can only draw so much screen time. So understandable.

. Abstractions of backgrounds and intense moments nice touch. Compared to the concrete reality, did not mind at all.

3.

. The father's mercenary life is the adversarial force here. A grudge of a throat.

. Old master is the one with a save, Maru with a matter, yet is Dash holding to principle via not killing? Fave scene: the last flashback, all complications considered.

. Wonder how Dash could have broken a wrist.

Conclusion.

This is Teen stuff, due to the reality complications of being a teacher, David now does freelance and serialised novels. Shame it's underrated. That's the price to pay when everybody can commercially copyright.

The last one I read was the most cognitaiment.

Confusionism

I guess the GoFundMe way of trying to bribe copyright extensions won't help protect small creators.

Not without the endless copyright trolls and all that. Oh well, guess I'll be ignored. It's a cautionary tale of being too terminally online.

That's the point with ulterior motives and motivated reasoning; I have it with myself with my own erotic intuitions. Yet I know that blind faith alone won't carry a good case.

On plot:Spectacle C.Dereck Varn

Memory of C.Dereck

This is a comment:

Being an entertainer, I can only find the concepts of Harlan Ellison's The Glass Teat inspiring to create literary entertainment. This concept aligns with Byung-Chul Han Cognitainment concept with my craft, I seek to make it into the creative commons. I can only assume our old copyright framework aids in this diffuse atomisation, like you said.

With all the cargo culting though.This may be the limits of our meliorism, granted with our social apparatus of these platform capitalists, left to our own devices to raise consciousness.

So I can only think of connection while still at the tension of these commodity relations as an edutainment creative class owning the means of production. Then carry on.

Seeing the normalised advertising and commodifying proffesion left to us, along with the subvertisement. The only thing on these platforms is locked within. It's arguable that with all this automated white-collar work now, it's going to first to go. It's a fascinating subject that came from aristotle of plot:spectcale, Robert Mckhee's argued in one of his craft books there is no distinction.

I guess we will have to move on with commodified para-social relationships from platform to platform. Thx for the talk, been doing my best to inform my praxis while not falling into the pragmatism traps.

More on entertainment, good and bad. I've read about:

Harlen Ellison's The Glass Teat 1+2 And his speech on toilets
Byung-Chul Han's The Good Entertainment > Those are goof
Robert McKee Character
Nicolas D Villarreal a soul of a new type

David Foster Wallace talk on consumerism > mid
The Attention merchants : Tim Wu

Neil Postman on Amusing Ourselves to Death and Technopoly. ( I don't know how long those ideas have lasted) >Negative

-

Current license opinions, of civic DUTY.

Couch Gregor, resolves. Also more Beep Boop because why not. Of all the law terms.

Are they going to know this is extrajudicial? Okay then.

• DRM is bad; it absolves civic duty. I have a mind that can informally judge ownership
  
  
• Ultimately, I have to conclude scraping ought to be public domain. not private equity or government. Any readjusting of IP law to fit their interest will lead to injustice.
  from the notes, fair use/fair dealing and public domain.
  
  
• Commercial firms ought to have their copyright reduced. Specifically Disney. Vertical media outlets should not have monopoly power over non-profits and freelance business acts. (Disney does not care about non-profits, it can take a 
  
  
• Protect Public domain, virality is a crapshoot other than the direct response platforms. Celebrity endorsements vertically travel at moments at the algorithm.
  
  
• Since there's no accepted conventional definition of plagiarism, it can be debated ad infinitum; it's infinitely generative. Conceptually and abstractly. So lawyers are needed for agreements. Yet the agreements themselves can become overwrought, so a handshake deal works best between client relations. (This ain't natural law, hence why the court and lawyers exist )
  
  
• Keeping the idea of the idea/expression is a useful fiction.
  
  
• Freedom of expression + Right to oblivion > Copyright. Since state-sanctioned monopolies don't need the first two, since popularity isn't needed. There are cases of unjust profit entitlement/fraud, yet they are always in favour of concentrated industries, so anti-trust first.
  
  
• That being said, a freelancer can be a case of vulturism, yet there's way more vulturism by Alen Dean Foster and in other cases. Creatives are losing their design rights out of silly clauses. (It's always disney/nintendo.)
  
  
• Nobody should make a living as a copyright troll, completely.
  (These are all my unforced opinions.)
  
  
• As time goes on, we are going to see more indefensible conceptions of the anacho-capitalist concept of self-ownership (If somebody does it, someone else will.) It's simpler; nobody does due to public domain. Non-binding and unforced with not statuatory.

These have been informed by Tom Scott, Patricia Taxxon, and Seth Godin [2] and Technollama, a technically proficient lawyer, and Geo

(If you want to check the law notes. and recreate advocacy groups)

The fun fun fun of the most frustrating arguments on microbloggers. Of the draconian copyright law.
oh This too. I feel like this is becoming cope bait. Again, too many bad actors hijacking.

Despite all these notes, I'm still keeping my, possibly last, zine's production untouched.

You are forgiven for your bad opinions

There are people that are never convinced.

Bit the golden apple, shoot themselves in the foot, litigate silly doomed cases.

Yet a kind and generous couch, can overlook those mistakes. Those errors

Everbody, except the ones not my Christmas card list, can be water under the bridge.

Well, except the ones who claim freindship rather than be a acquaintance. Or doesn't scab union stuff or copyright doctrinares/trolls.

Seth Godins cold copyright response

"Id you're a mediocre freelancer/firm, you're doomed, I can get a mediocre illustration from Stable Diffusion, and I own the copyright. Yet if you're the one and only illustrator, then I'll hire you" memory from one of his podcasts.

Did he mean this? A curation site I found.

One could argue his embrace of Ai (He does not use it for his blogs) Was his view of the mediocrity an annoyance, well, he's out of the call-out posts. So his ideas, including with his card pack, is to roll with it.

The systems of mediocrity was already here, that's what I agree with most.

Yet, he keeps writing. This is an indication as a b-corp liberal that's had it with this misconceptions of these business.

Wow, This fan blog of his writing style of publishing is still going huh?

The three triforce of Americana/Britannica

All under the law of copyright, will our creative labour be made asunder in alienated conflict.

Welcome to the Oligarchical lands of the western shooty lands of gangsters and whipshooters.

 Welcome to the Snooty Poshy land of the aloofers and the shoutys.

Welcome.

In unison.

In Hustle

In Crunch

In the Poshie and Salesman

In the Dregs, Wazzocks and Hacks.
We've got a land of what may

Of the corny "You like all the killing"

Or the way it illuminates

Or the way it obscurses

A cacophony of screaming brainrot roblox

A cacophony of swirling amusement delirium

Ufiction to unfiction. Copyright horror story

Well, From this story of derative. Of ufiction, uncomfortable fiction. Is a good story on if copyright trolls had there way.

I'll keep tabs there still creatives at the edge, having opinions and are not gig workers, trying to make it, even with the pull of perverse incentives.

We need to drop the pretence that copyright censors
hip could end the Ai phenomena. Plus it could infringe on my right to depict Bowser within satire with proprietary DRM. This is universal enforcement, not selective like copyright trolls do. My fan art is textbook copyright infringement. The onus is on the firm nintendo to send a DMCA takedown if I commercialize it.

Based on Kant's categorical imperative of internal freedom. Treating each other through consciousness rather than objectifying.

The inputs and outputs don't match, technically so it's nebulous. Plus, Copyright is anti-worker with the labor protection. It's for distributors/publishers, not creative labor.

Thankfully due the infinite shelf space of the internet distribution, micro-distribution it will niche out even if it could try (It's not like it's Super Bowl mass advertising, where one will have to buy/ask advertising/celebrity endorsements to get traffic. )

All that indominable logic of expanding content id and conception of ownership (Do they understand that? The idea/expression dichotomy exists.)

Walk away from this one. 

Tiredness of the Beep_Boop pro/anti hype.

Lurking on the LLM/diffusion engineers, (reasons listed here and my tab ICYMI)

May be indiscriminately be labelled pro AI with my rigorous epistemology and interpretation of these events. Despite what AI industry is doing, which I don't have control over.

Having to deal with Americanism seeping into England is, yeah. Well, I'm going to beat a cushion on England, don't you worry. Equal flogging. The west shall have it's course.

There images, the open source ones, not the Silicon Valley one, that nuance can be applied. Along with my novel which is hard to professionalize 

They're trying to lead the with my different interpretation of NFTs too, one I've tried, doing something out of trust in blockchain.

Empty slogan from the those who build a brand of Anti-ai, this is what happens with the fundamentals and foundherently misplaces from dubious sources, the lay-people still die on the hill of copyright and the water environment

Yet it's hustle culture I'm pushing back again, the in curiosity, the dangerous motivated reasoning behind such silly censorship laws of copyright, even under the pretence that it will be pro-worker and anti-ai. (It will never be, sorry folks)

Why are these insufferable-refuted zombie lies seeping in within UK discourse? Is this what cultural imperialism is like to the most showboat country? 

These are the pioneers, as with every novelist.

Guide my faith with the semiotic signifiers, from the spineless bottom. This is the courage of curiosity and it's made me an extremophile by default.

As if courage ain't a virtue for those that are racing to the bottom. Winner takes all financial capital head, follow the leader. It's up to us to take our epistemology out of the spammers, hustlers and hypebeast to search for the autodidactic metacognition. (As with that concept, qualitatively speaking.)

Plus, that Libby statement not for censorship is a positive thing, folks.

The ship has sailed.

(Bonus video, they way they act with the bad faith second order of the call-outs/cancels Peter coffin points out is worth noting here.) 13:22

What I've learned is the discourse is not going to be found of frustrated freelancers and microbloggers, it keeps going in circles.

Shadow Libraries Save em'

-

Look at those CLOWNS anti-ai wash academia most communist concept!

 Here's a link to the >> Shadow library Book << as you're reading. A call to protect the commons with 

This is the life, of our shared pool of knowledge in the commons to us.

Yet so to radicalisation (For all the wrong reason) are made to make sure it goes away by those who go I'm just doing my job to relatable/symbolic capital.

Radical Polarization, principled within a stereotype of a cartoon villain taking all art, regardless of the socioeconomic complexity. Along with the government, that's a matter beyond my comprehension of the way, with its interactions with copyright in Poland and the manner of environment. How decentralized platforms happen to work with regulation with the wall of shame, to the means of holding it with account to our civil autonomy. 

Now, we get to see that even with those who do and it's a long 4 day read.

The craft of natural sciences and the social, It's a prideful thing to be proud of.

Letter of disinterest of Beepity Boop Wars

It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse engineering accidents of Dall-E.

Then twitter became X and then an spectacle happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it, now it's a mess.

gambleor (on a shooting) said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that (Bad actors) happen to hold positions which broadly brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny." So we are now that stage of polemical convenience.

I'm not representative of my personal boycott of Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out and leaving.

So meta-polemics ooop

Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them.

Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.

I'm not representative of the Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out.

(Oh, I don't support the OpenAI fudge-up btw, this is me handling a complexity. I'll be misinterpreted and go several different ways due to reading comprehension.

The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within 

Tesla and Nfts are stocks are a thing have been bad market crash opnions. Now It's another turn.

Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls 'baby leftism' for lack of a better term (I call it 'wilfully misinformed' or Prerosterous), has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.

This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:

• Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient. It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out. Have to give it for fanart/fanfiction here. It's the worst possible argument of eliminative materialism of fair use.
  
  
  Any copyright framework that will forbid transformative works will have way more damage on startups, and fanart/remixs will be forbidden under the regime.
  
  Gotta claim these models are ontologically non-infringement by design; Input and outputs don't match. Fair use/fair dealing and within the public domain. Nobody should use the anarcho-capitalistic self-ownership principle here. It's way simpler when it's in the public domain; as an idea, nobody does it.
  
  Fan art and cover-band art will be banned due to civic responsibility moving from freelancers to commercial firms. Since the internet is built on infringement already.
  
  It's gonna be like the story the derivative. With the brain implants. Content Id from Disney/Nintendo.
  
  That's my Cassandra, unpopular opinion.
  
• Water has been refuted, repeatedly; here we are. Not even a carbon footprint.
• Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
• Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class/artisan/creative/Petit boug) Yet here we are.
•  Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels/koch group Group? Weird centrist opportunists like Ed Zitron,
  
  My charitable interpretation is they bought in. Most charitable.
  
  Is this yet another reach via an astroturf Christian (family value) fundamentalist, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism!
  
  
  (I wonder what happen to Karla Ortz embezzling all those copyright funds into a reactionary regime is feeling.)
• Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
•  Automation is a matter of capital and in regard to freelancers and firms. Too much epistemic certainty from those who aren't epistemic experts. (Post Edit, Also what will get replaced are teleological, capitalistic, commodified jobs in the job market, like copyrighters.
• The clanker slur 'discourse' has became ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
• Also, reflexive consciousness is an argument of people who don't know, So I clarified my position here. I don't have complete certainty, functional conciousness man that I am. So I can't comment on it.
• No, That 95% is an orphaned statistic cheif, it ain't scholarship.
  
  When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
  
  The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
  
  Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
  
  They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.

I must return to the rant since the small-scale bubble of social media isn't reflective of activism at large, since the thing isn't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaptation, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.

We will have to interpellate to this epistemic tech, for no epistemology is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaptation we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. These second-order effects.

So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with proprietary DRM? Misrablist with the Class that's supposed to be a civil lawsuit.

When they bring it like this.
Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul supporters and men's rights activists; that's my prediction. Copyright censorship? Nope.

If boycotts look like this, then it's going to yet another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.

I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right about this leopards eating its own face with its conception of ownership and property.

Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it. We are going to have to re-strategise with understanding this while ignoring the provokers.

So, it's going to be antitrust. Against the laws of censorship of copyright and odd anti-porn in order to win points to a privatised entity that's going. Good thing I'm going to self-publish. This has made me less radical and more of a sociological generalist in terms of allegiances for my campaigning for recognition.

(Oh and don't act like you've got a monopoly unless you go viral and get a Jeremy Clarkson endorsement, celebrity.)

And another bonus link of what to do with sociology by Nicolas D Villarreal. Of executive class dreams. That's a Marxist refutation

(bonus link.)

When Propriety DRM hits, Moral panic washing.

I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.

... This nsfw gag

Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers. 

Deontological application? If a cost that would not even work? <Article of a chief ecomonist btw.

No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?

Reading this free open university course of criminology

Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?

Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.

(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)

Moral entrepreneur is such a good term 🛋️💭

Plopyright hate post by Bintendo

Hopefully nobody proselytises with the doctrinaires. All the erotica about it is vastly superior to that business model. Well,

Worst thing about copyright is reducing all ideologies of art into transacting a monopoly to a publisher, that's not art. That outcome ain't the top of the algorithm of our attention of all the hits (Although I do get it, otherwise it's the fire hose kind of situation.)

Gift economies (that don't exist.) Pro bono work (Professional stuff) and Alternative means of models that don't mean being subservient to reactionary capital. Copyright is the biggest defence of monopoly, so it's necessary that is hides behind it.

Some Bluesky posts I've been collecting..

Retweet
‪@wwahammy.com‬· 3mo
Copyright is the most anti-worker invention ever. It allows companies to demand writers do free work and then decide after the fact whether they want to pay for it.
Lawyer>
‪Meredith Rose‬ ‪@mrose.ink‬· 3mo
COPYRIGHT IS NOT LABOUR PROTECTION. COPYRIGHT HAS BEEN ABSOLUTE DOG**** AS LABOR PROTECTION FOR THE LAST 400 YEARS PASS LABOUR LAWS. STOP ASKING COPYRIGHT TO FIX THE WORLD

Oh well, With a Fandom is that it's licensing malpractices with charity and other events, it's not something I'd like to flirt with. This video may sum it up, yet there's the amount of distrust to add to my reason of why am I not a gamer.

There's a continued insistence to enjoy toys and the pleasure principle.

Welp

https://www.suedbynintendo.com/ for all the litigious malpractices

This is what a monopoly without antitrust does to you folks: litigious malpractice.

(Bonus)

This has been going on for years with such a controversy. From the 1970's of the demonology of copyright. Twenty-page document of lectures of the thoughts.

Learning the Beep boopitys in academic circles

Beep Boop = Ai For any savvy reader out there, when I talk about it, within my microbloggers, I'm talking about it. I've to keep it low in case random aggro doomers come and nibble at

Since, its become a standstill of recursive doomerist. Ignore the news-headliners of ai being Jailbroken and come with me with my sources on knowing the beepity boopits.

( Post edit, I haven't checked Steve Banons the last invention ) the last two, this was where my curiosity had led out. Oh well.

I've mentioned The Last Invention, yet what about Machine Learning street talk?

Lump of cognition fallacy with the latest one here though, even though I enjoyed the definition of intelligence with less is more (Which is supposed to be a paradox btw.)

There, articulating theories that are better there, even the sceptics I felt like I learned something with intelligence being defined right now. Come and seek the new answers with a niche audience of a bunch of llm/diffusion and creativity that ain't reflective within the bubble of social media.

Because it's ultimately, and most fundamentally inconsequential, those who beg for propriety drm and infinity of copyright trolls.

Guess I'm stuck in the middle again.

Fair Use advocates

Interpretability the first one next-

Since copyright is a state sanctioned monopoly. Non-binding and unenforced. Freelance contract workers and the useful fiction of firms. It's not a platonic natural law.

Fair use advocates are appearing out of the seams. I can only sympathise due to the misinformation of micro bloggers.

The technical term is infringement, not plagiarism, and it ain't a felony. More an embarrassment.

Propriety drm won't solve this. This lawyer questioned the nofakes act, I agree. Thankfully it's not in effect.

"Why you should be worried about the NO FAKES Act:

-Threatens free expression and fair use

-Expands copyright law with broad language and vague definitions

-Harms open-source AI and tech innovation

-Would impact transformative works like fan and remix culture"

https://ccianet.org/articles/the-real-costs-of-the-no-fakes-act/

Welp, wish it the best. The lawyer is getting annoyed with the concept of 'market dilation' I'd say due to long tail there'd be diffuse, and I'm looking into automation from other sources other than the old doctrine of dialectical materialism.

freedom to choose/freedom to access, License faf

 These are state rights, from the state.

Prefer Freedom To access over the freedom to choose, being to choose to be a naughty publisher with a 95% contract of all labour.

Another victim claimed by the copyright industry complex.

Peter Coffin on licensing, character examination

So I'm going to dive into an excommunicated character. Time to commentary time with my impressions.

Yes, I'm posting this. IDC if you disagree, and you see this as an endorsement. Cussy things asides with all the amounts. Here's he goes with the labour theory of value. 

As with gatekeeping, well, better to gatekeep creative commons rather than copyright doctrinaire. Each vote of that only legitimises the system. (That's an anarchist saying)

I've had to my commentary with Hbomberguy and Innuendo, We may have had differences with the movie such as c*ties with me agreeing with feminists Podcast episode, that's here and there.

Oh and the content, I've simmered on that. It's capitalisms perverse incentives and race to the bottom, really. Any sociological, foundherent analysis yet nobody is calling the obvious thing out to Hbomberguy.

Wow, he's got excommunicated by the copyright doctrinaires! Woopsy. Going to abstain my judgement of the J. K. Rowling thing. Guess he's right to call out the harassment campaign of the liberal apologists of certain issues now left-coded.

(Even when then, Innuendo's This is Phil Fish video has passed in the past. He's doing presentations of thought terminating clichés now. Strongly Agree.)

Commentary channels with this Though over the word content means there's still some hope, along with left unity never being a thing since it's harder to accomplish, that's a good thing. Welp, with my own opinion of the content/format distinction being a non-sequitur.

It's gone south, though, along with Stephanie.

What happens with those full of social media capital of Symbolism and relatability do now? Get Sad and leave, or mad and try to consolidate and control. Have to agree with that.
Yeah, Opinion has lowered.

Oh yeah, I've discovered his position on Ukraine for the moment, and I support their right to self-determination. Frantz Fanon Self-determination. 

Agreement

Gen AI and propriety copyright

Fanboyish elitism

Understanding Sociology/neoliberal, and consumerism is not worker.

Prosumerism

The pontifications of the term content is a mindless popularity contest
Malthusian Documentary one is strong.

Disagree

Certain geopolitical issues. (Maybe here and there though, Idk Already here and there.) Third campism. (I heard rumours that he talked with maga-coms? Not confirmed, don't take it at face value.)

References analogic reasoning to South Park, they are inconsistent to libertarian. Pot stirring provocateurs with their polemists, yet he's using them in a consistent.
(That Took my jerbs gag.) (Post-edit Couch Gregor)

My emptiness that he may of not read Susan Hacks Foundherentism.

Gatekeeping, I'm suspecting more of moral panic and status roles of others on Twitter and all that pearl clutching.

If I gave a completely arbitrary game review score 6/10 for this self publisher.

Okay, As Bonus on December edit he called out the latest video by Drew here ai being profitable being a capitalist mindset, he's still blogging it.