Prosumer copyright doctrinaire : a smuggery disorder

IS THIS AI??

no!

Well.

Numpty or smugness?

Oh look at all thes flumpity dials! Including myself, it is! Get em!

WAAA copyright plaigraism infringment  something something bad must interpret for the defend

Revolting prostitutes: a fight for sex worker rights.

Revolting Prostitutes: The Fight for Sex Workers' Rights

Pornography

There has to be an exit strategy. There has to be a way in and way out

This details the whorearchy and disempowerment sex work does, along with the illegalisation and decriminalisation that will occur.

Or prostitute solidarity, a reinterpretation of Marx ( which found prostitute has part of the bourgeoisie unit ) Yet these are the conditions that come those who are sympathetic with the Hegelian > dialect.

The ideal model of the nordic model and the practice of the Nordic/Swedish model.. Commercial sex and non-commercial sex. Clear categories, clear understanding something from a monist material ontology.

It's never gone away, Labour protections, it's always labour protections, not copyright in terms of licenses regarding managers in relation to the capitalist mode of production and then brought with the commodity relations we are all behind, still stuck, still updated, it's fun how different ideology like queer theory and sex work seem to adapt and consilance as this comes with the foundherentist endeavour.

So 5 starts, Prostituion ain't the oldest profession prussion (it's farming) enjoyed it while I was in bed.

Acid Communist has a another argument as a bonus you can read for free.

Meilorism Vs Specification

Even with all the iterations, syncreticism, and eclecticism of aesthetic ideas with no physical boundaries.

The feedback of the editing practice and process leads down the way to the finish line, something that anyone without an editor can do, something that everybody can accomplish now that everyone can copyright.

To the point that it's enough and that physical shipping leads to the end. Yet teleologically, all accomplishments lead towards another.

Over and under the specification until the consciousness leaves it.

Agnostic non-curation

Oh, so what is it for the irrationality of the fundamentalness of the algorithm? Of prior recognition of a scroll that can be made into madness

I can determine the way it picks up the random matter; that's the definition of random, with no predictable fundamental, absurd to define by design. Fundamental candlesticks require a base.

So with this blind selection of organic traffic, be in it for the deal compared to an institution built around the copyright industry complex.

Once more, a trudge of the non-fundamental epistme of the realm.

Notes on Cosmic dash

These are the first impressions of the webcomic Cosmic Dash.

First Genre analysis 

Rebellion bad/status tragic, thriller/espionage/status admiration good, Action holdout prescriptive morality testing

Archplot – 1 Maru 2 Kracker 3 Dash

Demographic guess (generalising here): early teens - 30. No adult audience here. Psychographic science fiction fans jaded by Star Wars and into Ratchet and Clank media-wise.

1.

. Ai as adversial force was the force here, my personal fave was hal-9000 and Bender from futurama.

. Twist on the mad scientist cliche, the tragic scientist. Bittersweet Kimney could use an additional scene, including bucketbot.

. Amusement park, entertainment, Bucketbot! Comic relief.

. Hive mind got it coming; well, it's a cute act and could lead to more complications.

2.

. Orthos had screen time, along with Kracker

With the empire being the adversial. Sombre with Orthos.

. Package felt macguffiny. The infiltration plot felt more sincere.

. Would of liked to see Kracker develop afterwards. Can only draw so much screen time. So understandable.

. Abstractions of backgrounds and intense moments nice touch. Compared to the concrete reality, did not mind at all.

3.

. The father's mercenary life is the adversarial force here. A grudge of a throat.

. Old master is the one with a save, Maru with a matter, yet is Dash holding to principle via not killing? Fave scene: the last flashback, all complications considered.

. Wonder how Dash could have broken a wrist.

Conclusion.

This is Teen stuff, due to the reality complications of being a teacher, David now does freelance and serialised novels. Shame it's underrated. That's the price to pay when everybody can commercially copyright.

The last one I read was the most cognitaiment.

Confusionism

I guess the GoFundMe way of trying to bribe copyright extensions won't help protect small creators.

Not without the endless copyright trolls and all that. Oh well, guess I'll be ignored. It's a cautionary tale of being too terminally online.

That's the point with ulterior motives and motivated reasoning; I have it with myself with my own erotic intuitions. Yet I know that blind faith alone won't carry a good case.

On plot:Spectacle C.Dereck Varn

Memory of C.Dereck

This is a comment:

Being an entertainer, I can only find the concepts of Harlan Ellison's The Glass Teat inspiring to create literary entertainment. This concept aligns with Byung-Chul Han Cognitainment concept with my craft, I seek to make it into the creative commons. I can only assume our old copyright framework aids in this diffuse atomisation, like you said.

With all the cargo culting though.This may be the limits of our meliorism, granted with our social apparatus of these platform capitalists, left to our own devices to raise consciousness.

So I can only think of connection while still at the tension of these commodity relations as an edutainment creative class owning the means of production. Then carry on.

Seeing the normalised advertising and commodifying proffesion left to us, along with the subvertisement. The only thing on these platforms is locked within. It's arguable that with all this automated white-collar work now, it's going to first to go. It's a fascinating subject that came from aristotle of plot:spectcale, Robert Mckhee's argued in one of his craft books there is no distinction.

I guess we will have to move on with commodified para-social relationships from platform to platform. Thx for the talk, been doing my best to inform my praxis while not falling into the pragmatism traps.

More on entertainment, good and bad. I've read about:

Harlen Ellison's The Glass Teat 1+2 And his speech on toilets
Byung-Chul Han's The Good Entertainment > Those are goof
Robert McKee Character
Nicolas D Villarreal a soul of a new type

David Foster Wallace talk on consumerism > mid
The Attention merchants : Tim Wu

Neil Postman on Amusing Ourselves to Death and Technopoly. ( I don't know how long those ideas have lasted) >Negative

-

Current license opinions, of civic DUTY. (2026)

Couch Gregor, resolves. Also more Beep Boop because why not. Of all the law terms.

Are they going to know this is extrajudicial? Okay then.

• DRM is bad; it absolves civic duty. I have a mind that can informally judge ownership
  
  
• Ultimately, I have to conclude scraping ought to be public domain. not private equity or government. Any readjusting of IP law to fit their interest will lead to injustice.
  from the notes, fair use/fair dealing and public domain.
  
  
• Commercial firms ought to have their copyright reduced. Specifically Disney. Vertical media outlets should not have monopoly power over non-profits and freelance business acts. (Disney does not care about non-profits, it can take a 
  
  
• Protect Public domain, virality is a crapshoot other than the direct response platforms. Celebrity endorsements vertically travel at moments at the algorithm.
  
  
• Since there's no accepted conventional definition of plagiarism, it can be debated ad infinitum; it's infinitely generative. Conceptually and abstractly. So lawyers are needed for agreements. Yet the agreements themselves can become overwrought, so a handshake deal works best between client relations. (This ain't natural law, hence why the court and lawyers exist )
  
  
• Keeping the idea of the idea/expression is a useful fiction.
  
  
• Freedom of expression + Right to oblivion > Copyright. Since state-sanctioned monopolies don't need the first two, since popularity isn't needed. There are cases of unjust profit entitlement/fraud, yet they are always in favour of concentrated industries, so anti-trust first.
  
  
• That being said, a freelancer can be a case of vulturism, yet there's way more vulturism by Alen Dean Foster and in other cases. Creatives are losing their design rights out of silly clauses. (It's always disney/nintendo.)
  
  
• Nobody should make a living as a copyright troll, completely.
  (These are all my unforced opinions.)
  
  
• As time goes on, we are going to see more indefensible conceptions of the anacho-capitalist concept of self-ownership (If somebody does it, someone else will.) It's simpler; nobody does due to public domain. Non-binding and unforced with not statuatory.

These have been informed by Tom Scott, Patricia Taxxon, and Seth Godin [2] and Technollama, a technically proficient lawyer, and Geo

Distribution and rent-seeking. It's all so ideals. Presupposing the idealism in order for it too work, or dualism, Even if I follow a monist materialism of ontology.

(If you want to check the law notes. and recreate advocacy groups)

The fun fun fun of the most frustrating arguments on microbloggers. Of the draconian copyright law.
oh This too. I feel like this is becoming cope bait. Again, too many bad actors hijacking.

Despite all these notes, I'm still keeping my, possibly last, zine's production untouched.
Oh, in irrelevent news.

It's not like some legislation can be effected. Even if the appeal did not pass

There were various responses other than the usual fanatical ones. One is dismissive of the card being held accountable. Otherwhere, a "feel like it was a matter of time". 

Base rate fallacy or that dismissive said.

I can't draw a full judgement on this though, at this point. That's all.

You are forgiven for your bad opinions

There are people that are never convinced.

Bit the golden apple, shoot themselves in the foot, litigate silly doomed cases.

Yet a kind and generous couch, can overlook those mistakes. Those errors

Everbody, except the ones not my Christmas card list, can be water under the bridge.

Well, except the ones who claim freindship rather than be a acquaintance. Or doesn't scab union stuff or copyright doctrinares/trolls.

Seth Godins cold copyright response

"Id you're a mediocre freelancer/firm, you're doomed, I can get a mediocre illustration from Stable Diffusion, and I own the copyright. Yet if you're the one and only illustrator, then I'll hire you" memory from one of his podcasts.

Did he mean this? A curation site I found.

One could argue his embrace of Ai (He does not use it for his blogs) Was his view of the mediocrity an annoyance, well, he's out of the call-out posts. So his ideas, including with his card pack, is to roll with it.

The systems of mediocrity was already here, that's what I agree with most.

Yet, he keeps writing. This is an indication as a b-corp liberal that's had it with this misconceptions of these business.

Wow, This fan blog of his writing style of publishing is still going huh?

The three triforce of Americana/Britannica

All under the law of copyright, will our creative labour be made asunder in alienated conflict.

Welcome to the Oligarchical lands of the western shooty lands of gangsters and whipshooters.

 Welcome to the Snooty Poshy land of the aloofers and the shoutys.

Welcome.

In unison.

In Hustle

In Crunch

In the Poshie and Salesman

In the Dregs, Wazzocks and Hacks.
We've got a land of what may

Of the corny "You like all the killing"

Or the way it illuminates

Or the way it obscurses

A cacophony of screaming brainrot roblox

A cacophony of swirling amusement delirium

Ufiction to unfiction. Copyright horror story

Well, From this story of derative. Of ufiction, uncomfortable fiction. Is a good story on if copyright trolls had there way.

I'll keep tabs there still creatives at the edge, having opinions and are not gig workers, trying to make it, even with the pull of perverse incentives.

We need to drop the pretence that copyright censors
hip could end the Ai phenomena. Plus it could infringe on my right to depict Bowser within satire with proprietary DRM. This is universal enforcement, not selective like copyright trolls do. My fan art is textbook copyright infringement. The onus is on the firm nintendo to send a DMCA takedown if I commercialize it.

Based on Kant's categorical imperative of internal freedom. Treating each other through consciousness rather than objectifying.

The inputs and outputs don't match, technically so it's nebulous. Plus, Copyright is anti-worker with the labor protection. It's for distributors/publishers, not creative labor.

Thankfully due the infinite shelf space of the internet distribution, micro-distribution it will niche out even if it could try (It's not like it's Super Bowl mass advertising, where one will have to buy/ask advertising/celebrity endorsements to get traffic. )

All that indominable logic of expanding content id and conception of ownership (Do they understand that? The idea/expression dichotomy exists.)

Walk away from this one. 

Tiredness of the Beep_Boop pro/anti hype.

Lurking on the LLM/diffusion engineers, (reasons listed here and my tab ICYMI)

May be indiscriminately be labelled pro AI with my rigorous epistemology and interpretation of these events. Despite what AI industry is doing, which I don't have control over.

Having to deal with Americanism seeping into England is, yeah. Well, I'm going to beat a cushion on England, don't you worry. Equal flogging. The west shall have it's course.

There images, the open source ones, not the Silicon Valley one, that nuance can be applied. Along with my novel which is hard to professionalize 

They're trying to lead the with my different interpretation of NFTs too, one I've tried, doing something out of trust in blockchain.

Empty slogan from the those who build a brand of Anti-ai, this is what happens with the fundamentals and foundherently misplaces from dubious sources, the lay-people still die on the hill of copyright and the water environment

Yet it's hustle culture I'm pushing back again, the in curiosity, the dangerous motivated reasoning behind such silly censorship laws of copyright, even under the pretence that it will be pro-worker and anti-ai. (It will never be, sorry folks)

Why are these insufferable-refuted zombie lies seeping in within UK discourse? Is this what cultural imperialism is like to the most showboat country? 

These are the pioneers, as with every novelist.

Guide my faith with the semiotic signifiers, from the spineless bottom. This is the courage of curiosity and it's made me an extremophile by default.

As if courage ain't a virtue for those that are racing to the bottom. Winner takes all financial capital head, follow the leader. It's up to us to take our epistemology out of the spammers, hustlers and hypebeast to search for the autodidactic metacognition. (As with that concept, qualitatively speaking.)

Plus, that Libby statement not for censorship is a positive thing, folks.

The ship has sailed.

(Bonus video, they way they act with the bad faith second order of the call-outs/cancels Peter coffin points out is worth noting here.) 13:22

What I've learned is the discourse is not going to be found of frustrated freelancers and microbloggers, it keeps going in circles.

Shadow Libraries Save em'

-

Look at those CLOWNS anti-ai wash academia most communist concept!

 Here's a link to the >> Shadow library Book << as you're reading. A call to protect the commons with 

This is the life, of our shared pool of knowledge in the commons to us.

Yet so to radicalisation (For all the wrong reason) are made to make sure it goes away by those who go I'm just doing my job to relatable/symbolic capital.

Radical Polarization, principled within a stereotype of a cartoon villain taking all art, regardless of the socioeconomic complexity. Along with the government, that's a matter beyond my comprehension of the way, with its interactions with copyright in Poland and the manner of environment. How decentralized platforms happen to work with regulation with the wall of shame, to the means of holding it with account to our civil autonomy. 

Now, we get to see that even with those who do and it's a long 4 day read.

The craft of natural sciences and the social, It's a prideful thing to be proud of.

On Beep_Boop an honest investigation of fanaticism

- La Resistance independent -

- Sociological report start -

So what's your opinion on LLMS?

Your incredibly opinionated manner you himbo waltz into
The due diligence for your [ Perfect coherent interpretation here ]

Thats most divinely reconciliatory.
Okay serious.

Short answer: My position is sociologically with the epistemics of Susan Haack, Henry Ferrel, Abi Awomosu, aesthetically Masamune Shirow, intepretability from Matteo Pasquinelli. Discard the malpractice didney lawyers with culture war kruft.

Medium Answer:

This by Alice

It's a mixed review of the various critics of the venture capitalists and brings it's own conclusion of a solapunk/scrapunk. Garrison Lovely has a decisive take on Ed Zitron. I've had my own commentary with that model collapse.

Reading this essay and coming to your own conclusions with the overall thing. Since I'll cover all the philosophical positioning and typology.

"Most AI debates aren’t really about evidence. Instead, they’re arguments about futures that none of us have seen.

Nobody has seen superintelligence, a machine that most people agree is conscious, or a fully automated economy. Evidence can be gathered, but it underdetermines the conclusion. To fill the gap, we fall back on a combination of philosophy, political intuitions or, in some cases, tribal identity."

Long Answer:

Welcome, sceptics and hyper-believers. 👋🛋

Refutations to respect polysemy of a new age to end the dogmatic eristics of a fantastical boycott. Of vulgar critical theory 💪🛋⭐

The intellectual case. Away from the prosumer

metrology outside.

This embarrassment of praxis ends here.

To the end of the art hall monitors with their false historiography. To point a finger at the AI denial industry too.

A doxastic space this blind dogma ends here. Couch Gregor is angry. 🛋🔎 He'll do an investigation.

With Gags. Then, like Ghost in the shell illustrator, you'll know his position.

"But Couch Gregor, what do you mean you with the code word draw buff dudes

in tho-"

Done intuitively and counterintuitively.
~

Yes Kevin, I will go down to the dogmas that are presupposed with their precious, oh precious entertainment. Trivially true into the future.

is its useless/usefull? Valueable/worthless? Model/medium?

Whatever valence to put [derogatory slur] or [laudatory commendation]?
🛋🔎🔎🔎

Look at all those cartesian maps! Andy Masley bottom and Tree of Woe bottom right.

It's polysemic. Orthagonal. A big splotch

on the political map!🍅
So a go-go with non-expert couch Gregor.

1

Historical dungeon and AI Dungeon before things were innocent.

(well earlier than that) Since computation has begun.

It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse-engineering accidents involving Dall-E.

all of it was simple before

A call for beep_boop preparationism. No dog in the race. To end the ignorant assumptions, I must dive into the double consciousness of the artisan class. To that, with the couch gregor explains his multiple poistion.

Then a naughty publicity stunt.

It began.

Then after Alexander Avila, I'm like, why are we fighting? This factionalism or fandom had started. This is leading into a second-opinion bias encouraged by social media.

“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires. ”- John Steinbeck

So the temporally embarrassed double consciousness of the copywriter/graphic designers of centralised media.

Then Twitter became X, and then a spectacle happened. The Disney happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it; now it's a mess. The trolls have become snobbified. Something open source nominally got labelled as anti-centralisation. A false base for dialectics is not a way to go for it to be anti-worker. Such is the bad epistemology that had lead to this to seep of the brute truth to the power of the intellectuals and academics biting back at the entertainment industry.

Yet now..

We must have a discussion about this.

and I've had my investigations. My labels will have come and gone nominally.

Now that, as a preparationist, I suggest you hold onto your cushions. This one is going beyond the Ed Zitron, and Cory Doctorow.