Theodore Adorno, the indirect confrontation. I'll adore.
No point writing to hustlers who don't read, or who can't label or own their slog. No purpose to feed data and not itself, where's the sincerity of it? The short term wants of the audience cannot be made, is there balance? Should there be one?
The claim that it can completely independent is itself a political statement, the avant-garde defence. These are apologetics with their own character.
It's all about for vendors who don't want to listen, or do a rote mechanism towards a reductionist idea of transaction. All to the idea of being irresponsible to job specification. If only they were only more direct with their hustle.
Well, that's what it takes, with such as confrontation, even interpretation.
Which is why the prosumer itself feels like the most condescending, degrading to the craft of art to hackneyed product. So the paradox comes to move upwards again. The prosumer has a memory of a goldfish.
Which is why the prosumer itself feels like the most condescending, degrading to the craft of art to hackneyed product. So the paradox comes to move upwards again. The prosumer has a memory of a goldfish.