Divine punishment of public perception, Backlash on the backlash.

(Cw: Callousness) In reflection with the other post, thinking verbally rather than visually has really given me a new perspective on this issue.

Sometimes, battle ain't worth it, with the recent witch-hunts I keep seeing.

Nobody wants to hire an abuser. Lifes too short. Against professional entertainment etiquette. Callousness, or disillusionment, regardless, holier than though with such a perception.

I can understand why that'd microbloggers leave an information exchange. PowerPoint, where the discourse is out of context and with screenshots of little things where correlation those not cause causation, with drive-by science.

Micro-bloggers that is in within Twitter and Bsky.

Welp, the masses want their entertainment with this, so it's only this that will fit it. Prosumer as it were, the mass's one that we'll get.

Oh no, I use meme, how ironic, huh? Prosumers man, prosumers.

10 months ago, with its updated journalism defer Alex Avile/Cory Doctorow with regard to the copyright/environment (Andy Masley) and others, I think this was a touchstone from somebody who ain't academic looking from the outside in.
"Aggressively bright light to how hive-minded and dumb" ahh Flazfire.
Anyway, I'm going to be more recluse and not post this on the micro-bloggers.

(Got to give credit, here's the tweet he's referenced)
Why I don't go on Twitter. Or what outsiders looking inside are saying. Is this what trolls think who poison the well? Oh, had to credit the guy here's.
Here's another video that could be, I'm thinking being a visual-minded person having to integrate within verbal thoughts.
Here's a summation of the discourse back in 2012, and it still continues.

It's like the Austin Mconnell video again.

I guess with the moral panic slop I have to wade through, I'll see if I can keep this off microbloggers because of lack of citations. Trucking through incoherence and weirdness. (This ain't bloobergum kind of thing.)