Noble Savage act

"The whole thing is a really nice populist narrative for super online people. It works well because it proposes this idea of web capture, not due to user preferences and shifting technology, but because evil CEOs want it. But it doesn't align to reality.‪Key 🗝 🦊‬ ‪@keytryer.net‬· 1d
I don't like Doctorow/Zitron noble savage user view of the web, which to my understanding is: 1. Someone makes up a service that becomes popular 2. It's bankrolled for a while by investors 3. Eventually, founders decide they need to make money. They change the design/algorithms/ads."

One of my annoying patterns, institutions do, is to advertise themselves as voices in the wilderness. Yet we have industrialised society. That simply ain't the case.

If you're doing public relations, you're doing public relations and speaking for a team that's building up for a performance. Company or not.

Or is it some buzzword, coalition, group, comradeship, meeting, b-corp, corporate and Team.

They conceal with the same signifier, if its representative or single, do claim it. Save a lot of confusion and vulgar populists.

So there it goes.

In the wilderness, a badposterior, Iconoclastic, contrarianian, unjustified.

Into the wilderness.