Seth Godins cold copyright response

"Id you're a mediocre freelancer/firm, you're doomed, I can get a mediocre illustration from Stable Diffusion, and I own the copyright. Yet if you're the one and only illustrator, then I'll hire you" memory from one of his podcasts.

Did he mean this? A curation site I found.

One could argue his embrace of Ai (He does not use it for his blogs) Was his view of the mediocrity an annoyance, well, he's out of the call-out posts. So his ideas, including with his card pack, is to roll with it.

The systems of mediocrity was already here, that's what I agree with most.

Yet, he keeps writing. This is an indication as a b-corp liberal that's had it with this misconceptions of these business.

Wow, This fan blog of his writing style of publishing is still going huh?

Slop as meaningless concept

Thinking about mediocrity, along with the meritocracys associated with.

What is a slop?🛋🥣❔

#couchgregorblog #editorial

@Demigurlboss

"AI slop is a meaningless concept. It's not any more slop because it's AI, and the slop churn was going long before AI hit the scene. It's burying a thousand ledes so you can hop on an uncritical superiority bandwagon instead of acknowledging the impact of perverse incentives on social media and art.

IMHO, slop is something designed primarily with the aim of hitting an algorithmic feed and getting as many views and shares as possible. The point of slop is to get views because views equal money. It's something made for the sole purpose of exploiting social media payouts with minimum effort."

Nioce. Fast and cheap, the hackney'd lane comes around, even I entertain it with its tradition. It's where IP lies.

The perverse incentives, deserves to be placed here.

Drawing from memory.

Why I'm not a himbo

Or cannot specialise in its brand. Well, Qualitative expectations of over-specialism, When I want to philosophise, to do that, or when I want to do hackneyed porn, I do that. There's those who try to go at the edge of being unnecessarily libertine, this attempt to radical becoming a dependence.

Its an entertainment arch, noted before

The Thirstrap industry complex.

Im afraid, since ai has managed to take the thirstraps, the social media thirst rap is feeling its feet at the nail of the coffin.

Well, the same feelings i get from commercial illustration and graphic design, yet still, as a no name who sees copywriting on the deathbed thanks to the mediocrity churn of our industry, this shows its mea culpa.

Deep fakes, before 2023, it's all a sign, a sign that I cannot specialise into himboness and thirstrap.

Or at least, my tastelessness of seeing the expression that makes the Video games Dead Rain seem erotic. They are always going to be excuses to push the boat, to push for sexcess towards licentiousness.

It's more tastelessness now.

That's somebody who is libertine as it is sexploitation, paradoxically done as ethically as a character cleansing. Now, What is the purity comes I can keep performing like that. Can only do with my fictional constructs, even if the sex industry overlaps with the military industry complex, that's where the problem lies.

Yet it feels so 90s, where i express anything other than sexuality (books and WERDS) that these deliberate illiterates reveal their colours. Red flags of perverse incentives.

Such a casualness cannot forgive the illiteracy and mob manipulation of bad actors.

Since time immemorial of the internet, reply girls, there has been an army of sexual clerks who shy away from irresponsible. There needs to be a more careful consideration other than, erm, video game discourse levels. It's twitch stream, it's React stream discourse, dead genres, that zombie on.

So I can't specialise.

So forgive if I can't act like a thirstrap. I'll have to make a seperate nsfw microblog anyhow.

Ufiction to unfiction. Copyright horror story

Well, From this story of derative. Of ufiction, uncomfortable fiction. Is a good story on if copyright trolls had there way.

I'll keep tabs there still creatives at the edge, having opinions and are not gig workers, trying to make it, even with the pull of perverse incentives.

We need to drop the pretence that copyright censors
hip could end the Ai phenomena. Plus it could infringe on my right to depict Bowser within satire with proprietary DRM. This is universal enforcement, not selective like copyright trolls do. My fan art is textbook copyright infringement. The onus is on the firm nintendo to send a DMCA takedown if I commercialize it.

Based on Kant's categorical imperative of internal freedom. Treating each other through consciousness rather than objectifying.

The inputs and outputs don't match, technically so it's nebulous. Plus, Copyright is anti-worker with the labor protection. It's for distributors/publishers, not creative labor.

Thankfully due the infinite shelf space of the internet distribution, micro-distribution it will niche out even if it could try (It's not like it's Super Bowl mass advertising, where one will have to buy/ask advertising/celebrity endorsements to get traffic. )

All that indominable logic of expanding content id and conception of ownership (Do they understand that? The idea/expression dichotomy exists.)

Walk away from this one. 

Tiredness of the Beep_Boop pro/anti hype.

Lurking on the LLM/diffusion engineers, (reasons listed here and my tab ICYMI)

May be indiscriminately be labelled pro AI with my rigorous epistemology and interpretation of these events. Despite what AI industry is doing, which I don't have control over.

Having to deal with Americanism seeping into England is, yeah. Well, I'm going to beat a cushion on England, don't you worry. Equal flogging. The west shall have it's course.

There images, the open source ones, not the Silicon Valley one, that nuance can be applied. Along with my novel which is hard to professionalize 

They're trying to lead the with my different interpretation of NFTs too, one I've tried, doing something out of trust in blockchain.

Empty slogan from the those who build a brand of Anti-ai, this is what happens with the fundamentals and foundherently misplaces from dubious sources, the lay-people still die on the hill of copyright and the water environment

Yet it's hustle culture I'm pushing back again, the in curiosity, the dangerous motivated reasoning behind such silly censorship laws of copyright, even under the pretence that it will be pro-worker and anti-ai. (It will never be, sorry folks)

Why are these insufferable-refuted zombie lies seeping in within UK discourse? Is this what cultural imperialism is like to the most showboat country? 

These are the pioneers, as with every novelist.

Guide my faith with the semiotic signifiers, from the spineless bottom. This is the courage of curiosity and it's made me an extremophile by default.

As if courage ain't a virtue for those that are racing to the bottom. Winner takes all financial capital head, follow the leader. It's up to us to take our epistemology out of the spammers, hustlers and hypebeast to search for the autodidactic metacognition. (As with that concept, qualitatively speaking.)

Plus, that Libby statement not for censorship is a positive thing, folks.

The ship has sailed.

(Bonus video, they way they act with the bad faith second order of the call-outs/cancels Peter coffin points out is worth noting here.) 13:22

What I've learned is the discourse is not going to be found of frustrated freelancers and microbloggers, it keeps going in circles.

New Year, Self update and thoughts with Grandad. (Bonus Fave 3s)

Still taking pics of myself, with seeing if I can get a hernia treatment

He's alright, he's resting well with physical treatment doing well. Can't complain with the amount of chocolate that's come in with the off-brand oreo cookies. All part of the life of the Petit boug.

Darn, even unimportant. Feel less hustled than playing the latest video games to game social media

Wow, what's this?

Favourite Youtube Essays bonus!

1. Alexander Aviles : How Corporations hijacked the Anti Ai Backlash 

2. Fd Signifiers : Sinners and the Death of Black Art
3. (Challenger of another view) Peter's Coffin on Bomberguy - On elitism

Fav Podcast

1. Structuralism & Marxism (feat. Nicolas Villarreal) Emanicipation podcast

2. Neitzhe and the left Emancipation Podcast

3  Why Scientists Can't Rebuild a Polaroid Camera [César Hidalgo]

 Fav Substack essays

1. Knifestack: The death of the copywriter

2. Andy Masley : The Ai water issue is Fake

3. Devon Halliday : My Literary Fiction is more literary Than Yours

Fave Edutainment

1. CJ to the X : That Time Disney Ruined Kiki's Delivery Service

2. Flazefire : Twitter Artists (and why they're hated)

3. Corridor Crew : I turned my friends into living Toys

Marked for death/Marked for life

 Since certain things are blind side themselves, the doctrinaires that fly in my for-you feed with the occasional posturing the random beep boop hate.

I don't have to time, An alternative opinion is what I'm showing.

Already, they could frame this tweet, quote-mine it, then make it into a call-out post to try to get clout, yet I know better. Well, esteem, it's one big fluff of a drug. Only thing to proceed now to see others who have been through the dip and blocked, with the way of having.

Not curious or interested.
Do they realise that I'm dancing and contacting the catgirls and the furries of open-source, along with all that LLM/diffusion model discourse? Well, If they find this and take offence, that's a life.

Gamers are so, so behind on this, it ain't even funny any more.

@aelkus.bsky.social‬
"it's doomed on arrival it's doomed on arrival.
Hard to know where to begin. "AI" includes things as simple as heuristic search (go to first few chapters of the market-leading textbook). It is checking your credit card for fraud (neural network's early usage was in bank/credit transactions). Verbal creep is akin to what happened to "algorithms"
People's relationship to "slop" is also complicated. I hate a good deal of slop but also am an unabashed fan of AI-created cyberpunk electronic mixes, which I take mostly for what they are as background music much of the time
Framing as "anti-AI" at best gives you a high-end status market category, like "GMO-free" and crunchy stuff that eventually gave us RFK Jr and antivaxx crowd
I think a much more feasible thing to lean into is just the consumer backlash that is going to come after vendors realize corrosive effect of low-quality saturation 
‪Damned Robot‬ ‪@supremerobo.bsky.social‬· 3d

----
AI will probably end up being what is used to filter out Chinese factory dropshipping goods on Amazon once consumer anger forces action

---
barriers to entry will go up and its going to be interesting to see what kind of signifiers of quality will win out. history suggests they could take many different forms
i don't really have much of a clue about what they will be, in large part because vendors' interests also determine this as opposed to just consumer demand. remember chaos after FB tweaked its content recommendation/boosting software repeatedly? Fortunes instantly lost overnight
i do feel fairly confident that the crunchy approach probably leads to a dead end

Me too, as I looked into it.

I dive in the black culture, Josh Johnstone and FD Signifier.

In the words of Josh Johnson "Art can save your life. But entertainment will never be your salvation." Sinners, I see.

Still following F.D Signifier, his one on Charlie Kirk had quite the intro. So this is the video where he goes into the Hollywood and vertical integrated media does to independent creatives. Oh the hacknification of it all. So that's being the welcome to the machine all over again.

I don't know if I'm an ally or not, I'll leave that to the black communities
to decide.

I'm in the autistic beep boop culture, learning disability. Along with trying to sort that mess, that's where I'm positioned amongst the community map.

F.d Signifiers makes culture preserving, even with that wrong ai water take he did. Even if he goes deep into the silly ends of hating the prosumer spectacle, which i seem to ignore, which others have taken a anti-vax like conspiracy mindset too. I'm hiding with the catgirl open sourcers till a lot of the smoke passes through.

Paul Klee

Those were by another hand. The last two. Anonymous of outsider art.

Doing something you don't care about ; a good doomerist post

What happens when you commodify?

All merely at the breaking points rule of law?

Just do rule 34 art and tail popular entertainment campaigns?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just make sfw cutesy relatable comics while having no editorial work

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just do stuff at Buzzfeed with listicles and other things?

Do stuff I don't care about?

Just just just.

I do respect this doomerist substack article.

The lonesome death of the last copywriter

"I’ve had a growing frustration with the way AI skeptics, especially my comrades on the left, dismiss the likelihood of mass AI job replacement by pointing to quality problems that are both easily and affordably fixed.

Most creative jobs in the US aren’t making art that people care about. They’re making corporate slop that everyone hates, but which is necessary for doing business. The only people who will miss the human slop when it gets replaced with AI are the humans who used to get paid to make it."

Aaah, respect. Well, If it happens or not, have a look.


Listening to te the one and only Garth Marenghi's Bursted Earth. Or I could listen to Snoop Dog's voice read voices to me on Speechify. Which is more mediocre. Seth said it best with his own doomerism, anybody hustler stuff that he can use Stable Diffusion that's pretty alright, or the one and only illustrators he alludes to.

Or that, not rehortically, more convincingly. So that's his commodity fetishism and prestige. Magic and mysticism that can't be judges from the algorithm mindless data-landscape.

Shadow Libraries Save em'

-

Look at those CLOWNS anti-ai wash academia most communist concept!

 Here's a link to the >> Shadow library Book << as you're reading. A call to protect the commons with 

This is the life, of our shared pool of knowledge in the commons to us.

Yet so to radicalisation (For all the wrong reason) are made to make sure it goes away by those who go I'm just doing my job to relatable/symbolic capital.

Radical Polarization, principled within a stereotype of a cartoon villain taking all art, regardless of the socioeconomic complexity. Along with the government, that's a matter beyond my comprehension of the way, with its interactions with copyright in Poland and the manner of environment. How decentralized platforms happen to work with regulation with the wall of shame, to the means of holding it with account to our civil autonomy. 

Now, we get to see that even with those who do and it's a long 4 day read.

The craft of natural sciences and the social, It's a prideful thing to be proud of.

Letter of disinterest of Beepity Boop Wars

gambleor said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that Thunderf00t and Pat Condell happen to hold positions which broad brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny."

Principle, requiring an immaterial root This is a polemic of the narratives of polemics on micro-bloggers, because I know I'm biting the bullet. Yet I ain't simple or basic.

I'm not representative of the Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out, and leaving.

So meta-polemics ooop

Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them.

Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.

I'm not representative of the Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out, and leaving.

Change of beleifs times.

The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started the all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within 

Tesla and Nfts have been telling you of such wild dismissals, and I can read to that and draw it into info and into knowledge. If you've been wilfully misinformed, they are either hustlers or a bad actor. Hustler, there's only so much time to get the information that's sensible, that's not some BuzzFeed article.

Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls Baby Leftism for lack of a better term, (I call it Wilfully misinformed) Has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.

Yes, that's why I've had to moderate my stance on this, focus on broad brushing polemics provided by the perverse incentives of direct response (Things getting more outrageous than they already get)

This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:

• Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient, It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out. Have to give it for fanart/fanfiction here.
• Water has been refuted, repeatedly, here we are. Not valid.
• Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
•  Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class Petit boug) Yet here we are.
•  Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels Group? Weird centrist opportunists like Ed Zitron,)
  
  Is this yet another reach via a astroturf Christian (family value) fundamentalists, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism!
  
  
• Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
• . Automation is a matter of capital and in regard to freelancers and firms. Too much epistemic certainty from those who aren't epistemic experts. (Post Edit, Also what will get replaced are teleological capitalistic and commodified, like copyrighters.
• The clanker slur 'discourse' has yet become ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
• Also, reflexive conciousness arguing of people who don't know, So I clarified my position here.
  
  When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
  
  The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
  
  Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
  
  They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.

Shooting themselves in the foot. Scraping of all things are being demonised now.

I must return to the rant since of the small scale bubble of social media ain't reflective of activism at large, since the thing ain't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaption, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.

We will have to foundherently adapt to this epistemic tech, for no epistemological is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaption we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. This second order effects.

So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with propriety drm? Misrablist with the Class that's supposed to be a civil lawsuit.

When they bring it like this.
Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul Supporters, and Mens right activists, that's my prediction. Copyright censorship, nope.

If boycotts look like this, then it's going to yet another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.

I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right about this leopards eating its own face with its conception of ownership and property.

Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it. We are going to have to re-strategize with understanding this, while ignoring the provokers.

So, it's going to be antitrust. Against the laws of censorship of copyright and odd anti-porn in order to win point's to a privatised entity that's going. Good thing I'm going to self-publish. This has made me less radical and more sociological generalist in terms of allegiances for my campaigning for recognition.

(Oh and don't act like you got a monopolist unless you go viral and get a Jeremy Clarkson Endorsement celebrity )

The spectacle, the spectacle, oh, the spectacle. I'm getting tired (bonus link.)

Peace ✌🛋

When Propriety DRM hits, Moral panic washing.

I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.

... This nsfw gag

Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers. 

Deontological application? If a cost that would not even work? <Article of a chief ecomonist btw.

No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?

Reading this free open university course of criminology

Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?

Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.

(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)

Moral entrepreneur is such a good term 🛋️💭

Reassembled/reinstatement rather than Replaced

 As I try to have an opinion (no opinions allowed on Twitter, artist) of being reassembled rather than replaced.

Two Studys, One of the evidence on Reinstatement. Along with a working paper on Robots and firms I've read. So do entertain better ones before looking at microbloggers and anger there.

(That's the physicalism's way of testing, from literature to textbook. Learned that from bodybuilding.)

Alternative to the populist one that worlds going to end, merely because that elite class, ( Demographically Christian white men in the west, capacity qua capacity) going to control slightly less of it. With its token supporters.

That's one of my theories with labour markets being made anew, deproffesionalize and professionalizing of our cycle.

Here's a materialist/ideology interpretation of the AI with structuralism. As I learn the tenets to apply to my method of understanding the world of qualitive differences. Here's an hour of a book I'm getting. B-B-Bonus video

Learning the Beep boopitys in academic circles

Beep Boop = Ai For any savvy reader out there, when I talk about it, within my microbloggers, I'm talking about it. I've to keep it low in case random aggro doomers come and nibble at

Since, its become a standstill of recursive doomerist. Ignore the news-headliners of ai being Jailbroken and come with me with my sources on knowing the beepity boopits.

I've mentioned The Last Invention, yet what about Machine Learning street talk?

Lump of cognition fallacy with the latest one here though, even though I enjoyed the definition of intelligence with less is more (Which is supposed to be a paradox btw.)

There, articulating theory's that better there, even the sceptics I felt like I learned something with intelligence being defined right now. Come and seek the new answers with a niche audience of about a bunch of llm/diffusion and creativity that ain't reflective within the bubble of social media.

Because it's ultimately, and most fundamentally inconsequential, those who beg for propriety drm and infinity of copyright trolls.

Guess I'm stuck in the middle again.

Mechanical optimism Dario Amodei, along with Doomerism examined

  Dario Amodei seems to be sick of the doomers, I am too.

Guess with AI visions, I'll leave with a positive note. Machines o
f loving grace

That's the positive aspects of ai. Biological pathogens being sorted along with the ways of lays being rigorously analysed, not seen and a foundation within discourse, only to test theories.

Really gives me hope, even though it's coming through anthropomorphic, well, I can converse now with capital. Big does not necessarily mean bad if it's governed well. We all can't be noble savages.

Greater wrong has written by Doomerism and it's shades, time for emoooooo.

I'm a little ennui frankly, myself. Yet these layers of the onions are the self-described doomers.

Yet the idea of robot overlords getting bored as I skimmed through my the mathematics as entertainment made me interested, yet that tells something more about me than. It's by @jdp.extropian.net What about this, and Intermingling with the LLM engineers now because why not, This is what happens when a journalist does takes and even citizen journalisms.

Can't broad brush all believers at this rate.

Enjoy those links in the doomer examinations, because I'm not clicking em, to confess.

Oh, Fresh Episode of The last invention is here. I'll be putting these under the Beep_boop to show how much editorials I've done on AI. Clambering for certainty with opinions to how to find peace of mind.

I mean, bonus lecture at the risks and assessments of the risks, even the one I've done with psychosis one.

Fair Use advocates

Interpretability the first one next-

Since copyright is a state sanctioned monopoly. Non-binding and unenforced. Freelance contract workers and the useful fiction of firms. It's not a platonic natural law.

Fair use advocates are appearing out of the seams. I can only sympathise due to the misinformation of micro bloggers.

The technical term is infringement, not plagiarism, and it ain't a felony. More an embarrassment.

Propriety drm won't solve this. This lawyer questioned the nofakes act, I agree. Thankfully it's not in effect.

"Why you should be worried about the NO FAKES Act:

-Threatens free expression and fair use

-Expands copyright law with broad language and vague definitions

-Harms open-source AI and tech innovation

-Would impact transformative works like fan and remix culture"

https://ccianet.org/articles/the-real-costs-of-the-no-fakes-act/

Welp, wish it the best. The lawyer is getting annoyed with the concept of 'market dilation' I'd say due to long tail there'd be diffuse, and I'm looking into automation from other sources other than the old doctrine of dialectical materialism.

Peter Coffin on licensing, character examination

So I'm going to dive into an excommunicated character. Time to commentary time with my impressions.

Yes, I'm posting this. IDC if you disagree, and you see this as an endorsement. Cussy things asides with all the amounts. Here's he goes with the labour theory of value. 

As with gatekeeping, well, better to gatekeep creative commons rather than copyright doctrinaire. Each vote of that only legitimises the system. (That's an anarchist saying)

I've had to my commentary with Hbomberguy and Innuendo, We may have had differences with the movie such as c*ties with me agreeing with feminists Podcast episode, that's here and there.

Oh and the content, I've simmered on that. It's capitalisms perverse incentives and race to the bottom, really. Any sociological, foundherent analysis yet nobody is calling the obvious thing out to Hbomberguy.

Wow, he's got excommunicated by the copyright doctrinaires! Woopsy. Going to abstain my judgement of the J. K. Rowling thing. Guess he's right to call out the harassment campaign of the liberal apologists of certain issues now left-coded.

(Even when then, Innuendo's This is Phil Fish video has passed in the past. He's doing presentations of thought terminating clichés now. Strongly Agree.)

Commentary channels with this Though over the word content means there's still some hope, along with left unity never being a thing since it's harder to accomplish, that's a good thing. Welp, with my own opinion of the content/format distinction being a non-sequitur.

It's gone south, though, along with Stephanie.

What happens with those full of social media capital of Symbolism and relatability do now? Get Sad and leave, or mad and try to consolidate and control. Have to agree with that.
Yeah, Opinion has lowered.

Oh yeah, I've discovered his position on Ukraine for the moment, and I support their right to self-determination. Frantz Fanon Self-determination. 

Agreement

Gen AI and propriety copyright

Fanboyish elitism

Understanding Sociology/neoliberal, and consumerism is not worker.

Prosumerism

The pontifications of the term content is a mindless popularity contest
Malthusian Documentary one is strong.

Disagree

Certain geopolitical issues. (Maybe here and there though, Idk Already here and there.) Third campism. (I heard rumours that he talked with maga-coms? Not confirmed, don't take it at face value.)

References analogic reasoning to South Park, they are inconsistent to libertarian. Pot stirring provocateurs with their polemists, yet he's using them in a consistent.
(That Took my jerbs gag.) (Post-edit Couch Gregor)

My emptiness that he may of not read Susan Hacks Foundherentism.

Gatekeeping, I'm suspecting more of moral panic and status roles of others on Twitter and all that pearl clutching.

If I gave a completely arbitrary game review score 6/10 for this self publisher.

Okay, As Bonus on December edit he called out the latest video by Drew here ai being profitable being a capitalist mindset, he's still blogging it.