A solution for Ai-identity, Anti-trust Egalitarian. Links.

Rawwr Kyro is doing his ranting here with notes on Tech Journalism.(If you're new, check out my other notes on AI and licence in the search bar)

I must do this the strawman to feel carthesis to my audience.
(image from Deja 98 Rom hack)

MuH FREEDOMS'n HuSTle'n  Propyright rights MICKY MOU- 

CRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCNCCCNCN Free Palestine! (Thats the thing, ain't it? It's not so simple as a dunk tweet or a microblog post It merely entertainment right?)

Let me clear some conceptual confusion.

A little petering out with News, welcome to journalism. It could be going completely public domain as things go on. The denialism and copyright self abnegation a defeatist dead-end, especially with the copyright-lets-be-under-the-kind-monopoly-of-disneys/nintendo-content-id-drm sort. I feel like I'm talked down like a child by westy liberals.

As copyright there to consolidate the distribution into capital.

‪@tentacle.expert‬

"SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"

 Aaah doctrinaires'n the anarchists, what to do. Always leaning in the sympathy of the Anarchist. Nightmare, asymmetric enforcement. What will happen when DRM and the commodification of scraping by big content will do? Will I'm not affiliated with that union like Lenin was. Class character first.

Are people in for a rude awakening once this DRM is applied?

Also, ain't Eddy Zetron and his bubble narrative bogus? NFT =/= Prosumer Gen Ai. Well, I've never listened to him anyway. He's still wiggling Coe? Meh.
...

(Now that I thnk about it, encruddificaton seems more like a absurd concept, even when I wrote about it. My hypocrisy alarm bells of a contradictory axis are going off. The only thing he's doing this is for his self-service now.)

I'm using my right in the editorial that hes... infamous grifting. The nft/genai comparison has done so much damage to the discourse. I've written about

Oh, he's got a diaper burping fetish, at least with my entertainment I put it under the legalese that it's fiction.

He's name-searching and sending petty malpractice insults. Why is he the prophet and gospel to anti-ai dogma?

I'm outta there!

Well visual media has its own drawbacks, cartoon discourse ain't conductive, and it ain't hiding the malpractice of the dog piles I'm seeing on Bluesky I don't know why I'd say this. I'm not going to answer the dismissive hustling, it's not for me. Such is a mob rule and the wilful disinformation now.

"Just let me work! Anything. Desperate. Make me silly mindless entertainment. Do whatever specification you want sire, anything to serve! I want job. I need to prescribe as-written instructions"

Texas sharpshooter Fallacy anyone with this discourse with the talking points refuted?Does microblogging facilitate it. It's why I don't post some of these blog posts there. The biggest danger is that the discourse and comprehension they are getting are from a meme, and that's the discourse now.

Twitter and bluesky have destroyed discourse so that's, why I try to limit myself, it's indulging in the techmonoplitic manipulations that Neil Postman warned about in amusing ourselves to death.

Please, denialism and hustle ain't going to answer this question west, expertise going to lead ahead. "It's boring and it will go away!" Nope. I learned with the NFT stuff that this stuff is still present.

Oh, Even now, it feels like excuses to hustle more.

Even with the crash, will it be lose-lose (that's how a doomerist views it, I take it as neutral continuously.) 

This article goes into the prosumer, marketing terms design for direct response and says these are statistical inference.

Or not, this site says it's within the reach of knowledge and the emergent intelligence, or it's Inference of curational decryption matter. Arg.

Link on don't be a A**hole of impossible principle and ideals. By my reflection of this thread on Tumblr. Paternalistic inspiration P*** will not be tolerated within my platform.

I'm going to check the nuanced AI feed and do check out the for you feed too which is better than the discover feed too.

(Oh, I look and try and digest takes) Such as this retweet. I don't retweet in bluesky because of the fickle followers. You are one of the good ones though, who can trust an editorial and an opinion and not a short, quippy and wrong dismissal. I'm entertaining Neil Postman's amusing ourselves to death when I'm using that format.

‪@eleanor.lockhart.contact‬
another thing people don't realize when they fantasize about "the AI crash" is that you're going to see a *lot* more slop and harmful use of AI whenever the big companies do crash, because the crash would drop GPU prices drastically & make cybercriminals etc. training models much, much cheaper"

Oh, that is an idea with all these marketing predictions, something to take account for a preparation.

According to this Test which I felt it was polarising and misrepresentative, I entertained it again. Did my own Ai-identity, which reflected my one and only position. You're free to take it.

Many takes on the thread.

Another Typology as an intuition pump to understand this.

Find myself in agreement to this.

Now as Anil Dash with his own decentralised AI models that are plural, is it forbidden of Green version? Remix culture'n all that I lean on.

He even linked to the video, antitrust leads to trust, I take it.

Welp, Good luck with that with Really Good AI. Kyro will do what he does, Squashinghe west military industry complex.

I'll prepare for a new doomerist movement. I'm not going to associate with this anti-vaxx that's left coded, it's malpractice. Not much vision for the future other than the eternal present. This will cause hijacking and destruction.

‪Key 🗝 🦊‬ ‪@keytryer.net‬· 2d
Current anti-technological trends have no imagination of what the world looks like after this. They want an eternal y2k and an artificial ban on computation. "It doesn't matter if you cure cancer, if no one can be a doctor anymore." It's bleak to me.

Unless we build an alternative.

There will be, as an antitrust egalitarian I propose a right to the city

oh look my EFF stickers have arrived

Regardless, the discourse has regressed on Bluesky. Thank you for reading my rant.

Beware mass market Tailism Computationalism = The maker of Slop

Now for this version of this Post and forming a rant as I become kitsch like this post. This is my scribomania making another post to see if I can act out from this. Well, here's me looking into the lifestylism.

Human Sloppers, Ai Sloppers, anything that already fills the search engines. Stochastic Seo servitude. Well, Fwopman happened to say stochastic parrot, I do say with big content and Alexander Avile refutation, With the statistical inferences of deductive and inductive processes;.

Short term, self-absorbed seo cargo culting. Even with radical opposition, it becomes a dependence (Was Martin Heindigger to point that out?) Mmm, better be quiet with the Confuseopoly swindles.

It's doomerism cult. Short term and selfish, Welp, Like an advertiser.

So when if all the time to build a coalition firsthand, a tribunal of the others and important allies that can help satisfy the needs, and punish to fit the responsible course. They can be placed within trust.

So, with the cool-hunters, the cultural conservatives, There's only the right to the city that will remain

"You gotta slop it up! 🎶" This song is stuck in my head as I did not invite it, it's a deviation of you gotta pump it up from the substance

That's life huh, well, Sturgeons law of 90% is that there is stuff to ignore. Curation time! Curation for amelioration.

mmmmmmm

welp, an entertainer's gotta entertain

Hypocritical Stream of consciousness is the point. Inconsistent bibliography.

(Wip for environmental sketch for HPComic)

So, I haven't read James Joyce yet, guess I'm not a savant.

Yet this stream of consciousness where i entertain thoughts without committing to them fully is point, if they get offended or not, outside my purview, like how did can be responsible for that?

Is disclosing a bibliography a rant? Not that i know off, well, it could be a that i disclosed and overshared. Well, the bibliography is the part where one should overshare. Those are all the sources.

Authors can be authors without becoming authoritative on this, under there own volition of responsibility to do what they want and not intrude into others self-defence function for each other, co-exist.

They can be direct with me if my indirect bibliography in this blog.

🛋⭐

Here it is. Minus the sex joke.

"Heya, bibliography thoughts on Ai. (Hopefully I don't get blown up by a butlerian jihad like in dune ) It's not that simple. So it's why I'm showing it. @sunnmcheaux and @Austinmconnell has done reasonable takes, Flazfire has done a video on Twitter Artists and how annoying they are, yet I think he's wrong on plagiarism and environment. That's youtube. Alexander Avile is the top banger though. As for environment, the accurate take was by Andy Masley on substack, I'm being anti-doomer on this while taking a more preperationist stance like Neil Postman. Reading his Technomoply and Amusing ourselves to death.

It even intersects with Media Theory, Tim Wu Attention merchants, Matthew Bartholmew Adcreep, Seth Godin This is Marketing, (He has done a course on AI) Doug Ruskoff The Merchants of Cool and the Generation Like Documentary. Even Harlen Ellison The Glass Teat and the Second Glass Teat editorials on the television industry complex. Herschel Gordon Lewis books on copywriting. Woo! Foundherentism of evidence matters is why all these theories intersect like a crossword, By Susan Haack. Moral theory to Deontology and Utilitarianism somewhere in the background. Thank you! Phew 🛋️💨 Feel free to ask questions."

Yet, I know with this prosumer culture, do they care? Am I showing off? Or is it the part that is required? Well, it matters to those who read, no point to those who are illiterate, or the post illiterate now.

Can't lapse into consistency for consistency’s sake. Or simplicity for simplicity due to me not being able to face the Curse of knowledge with these simplified platforms of micro-blogging memes and gag shorts.

Those platforms are designed for those who don't read, and don't have a bibliography there, I will have there. It will remind me of the curse of knowledge which will permit me for another post.

Jawboning and a Retrospective of facing the mob

Skull for memory, No reference. Continuing the diplomacy or discourse of AI, well, On here atleast.

Have you watched Alex Avile and the backlash to the backlash to the backlash? Welp, you are in it right now, I've been trying to build bridges. I'd recommend you watch this before you become here.

I must commend Alex for not taking his video down, this odd collusion of hollywood conservatives that are hijacking and destroying movements needs to be noted.

(Cw, human rights rambling from a tired couch. Including a bit of a socialist analyst) Aaah, The defeatist, misrablist dead end of copyright, if Harlen can call them the 7th circle of hell with publishers, maybe I can place a spicy opinion here.

 Silence is capital, another monopoly, when everybody is trying to build trust on the internet, the editorial confessions roll out. Along with the drab examination of the liberal centrists who'd happen to defend the private proporty relations from consolidating commidy value, oh, such a thing that you could state

Journalists don't owe the entertainment media pr any slack. Alex Avile self-publishing that Nickles group disclosure. With such is the diplomatic to the copyright maximalists that he got crudded on. It's always a game, troll bait, and a hornets nest that does not have. He did not sign a non-disclosure deal unlike those of the copyright alliance did so he did a community service.

There's something awfully centrist with publishers wanting to consolidate the means of distribution then raise the commodity value of art, really? Is that the culture industry, I do commodity fetishism

From Deepdreamnights, a public domain artists.

"The anti-AI side isn't actually anti-AI, they're pro-regulatory-capture-of-AI-by-Megacorporations. The copyright anti-AI argument conveniently leaves it open for Disney, Warner Bros, Nintendo, Sony, the RIAA, all to make their own AI systems to lower their production costs, because they own more than enough material to make powerful datasets.
They get it, you don't, worst of all possible worlds."

imsobadatnicknames2

It was actually a very thematically important foreshadowing arc setting up the Online Artist Community™'s tragic descent into the very thing they sought to destroy (people who want to expand the digital mechanisms to enforce the concept of ownership of .jpgs)

So yes, in light of this new info, I'll be keeping a meter at the CYA copyright enforcement that will only entail a unsafer internet. It's there to empower publishers, not the artists.

‪xormetric‬ ‪@tentacle.expert‬· 08/01/2024
SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. Who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"

There are plenty of rights more important than copyright, freedom of expression is one of them, including the freedom to assembly and to protest. Yet it's alarming, so I'll keep a head low her and be sure to differentiate the western artists from the lower working classes.

It's why I've not been posting much, there are absurd paranoia brewing, and it's getting bleak, so sense of discussion as there no's certainty on this issue. Odd activities like Style phrenology along with echo chambers, doing research on this topic like it matters, people need to know the community service of Couch Gregor.

Yet this dirt-digging and wild speculation of ad-hominins only means that they're creating a spectre of free like Nintendo does with its own copyright, only that will understand that this time it's left everybody on the statecraft map in disarray.

I'll leave out with another quote retweet. It's a understatment that this DRM enforcement is going to accidentally be the most second order pro-ai, the bad pro-ai move that's going be, a worser regime overall.

So freedom of expression > copyright, the publishing script puts too much in the hands of publishers and record labels.

‪@valkyrie.hacker.gf‬
Follow
we're literally going to get mandatory DRM brain implants at this rate


B-Bonus retweet.
Erica "digifox" Kovac

I feel weird being in the "middle" on the AI Argument. The hype machine is out of control, but the anti-AI crowd is almost as crazy with the only redeeming quality being that they have very little control over anything.

I think that generative AI is anywhere from "a cute toy" to "mildly useful in limited contexts" and that Big Tech companies did nothing wrong in training genAI models the way they did because a stricter reading of fair use would risk disallowing many types of transformative work.

I think that the way it's being deployed by the hype-mongers is frequently irresponsible and sometimes deliberately attempting to provoke backlash. I think the long-term destabilizing impacts are minor compared to the overreaction dynamics at play currently.

Like the video model demo from OpenAI recently where they generated a fake closed circuit video of Sam Altman stealing GPUs from BestBuy or w/e seems like it must've been calculated to spook people.

  (My response to the hype mongers is well, sex sells, for better or worse.)

Ted Underwood‬ ‪@tedunderwood.com‬· 55m

Based on social media, you might think the US was in the middle of a Butlerian Jihad. But IRL neither party has shown much appetite for regulating AI; universities aren't trying to ban it; content industries are adapting to it. The venting is anti-correlated with change.

This is why no one is writing 10k words a week to counter Zitron's ~10k words about the uselessness of models, inevitability of collapse, &c. You don't need to write 10k words every week arguing that the moon should continue to orbit the earth. People who like the moon's orbit can chill.

I look at Alex Avile for speaking the truth, yet the Tailism of other entertainers along with the inanity of media monopolists. Those who consolidate the distribution. Means That one should always caution with publishers being friendly, there is already an agonise going on.

Thoughts on Andy Masley: the principle of nuance

(Since I've decided that economic downfall is going to continue to get more incredulous, I'll decide to do my own research. More commentators are referring to "Bubble" in quotations.)

(I guess, even with the pre-conceptions and fundamentalists view I'm not a fundamentalist btw, I'm going to leave this one, hopefully they'd use this info reasonably and responsibly. As I'm typing this there are more commentary on the Sora video thing that I'm not going to further comment, not my job.)

Noting and responding to these events is what journalist does with editorial control. Seeing another silly spectacle of narratives in the west always baffles me as I try to evaluate one of the hobbyists here.

Hmmmph, Yep, not going to pop according to this Reuter's article, yet, I know it has not done honest reporting before, yet I trust it here (There was an reporting error within another geopolitical thing that I forgot.)

Okay time for another opinion piece, non-fiction, yep I only write for those who don't tire of it. TBH, nobody on microblogs can read this long anyway, so this is a tactical choice on my part.

This is better at envisioning concepts of the current discourse of AI, thanks, I'll take that positioning axiology. Another collection of notes as I research this technological determinist.
( This is according to him, I'm copy-pasting it. So that there is a clear discussion. )

Written before with my journalism that it's all about seeing what I can do to help out.

That's what copyright is btw, a state-sanctioned monopoly that is there to empower the publishers, not us. Yes, that's what I do with siding with the creative commons in terms of keeping the internet an open host. So it's a statecraft decision to say that it empowers publishers/publicists too much. Treating them as arbiters, not punishing them.

Copyright is the stuff publishers take from us when we go viral with a book deal, taking 95% percent of the profits once virality hits randomly, that's piracy! (Spoke like Bopkin Cappy there.) It's a publishing right, not a creative right like freedom of expression and assembly.

Yet here we are, having to pick allies, or be passive with this reading.

This propertarian manner, though, I have to reject it. An ascension
on of such a legal fiction to a creative rights will have to do.

I've been trying to build bridges with diplomacy, because y'know what entertainers do is to not send death threats and continue to host a world of wonder. Guess those who serve of giving up their copyright to publishers have put me on the naughty block list, or I'll guess they'll do what I want with toxic positivity, statecraft correctness. I'm in complete agreement with Andy these discourses have become too erm, skirmish for me to keep track.

Andy Masley, despite having loose connections to 80,000, seems to have sensible takes within AI Better than any YouTuber. Could be an appeal to origin to point that he points to vegan posts over there. Needing the foundherent reason for things as things get syncretic, wooo! What a time.

I'll have to fight for my autonomy within certain talking points that invade even the most reputable sources, stuff that I cannot trust now. (Water is a silly metric.) Could honestly do a libertarian socialist solution to all this ai-talk.

Youch, Look at those numbers.

Somebody wrote that the left (or, what I call the troglodyte left, or derogatory slur left) is built on performative bullying (Callout culture) and smug certainty (String Theory like what physicists say), Yet this subject still has that, non-certainty. So take that for what you will, it's only found on Twitter.

We're going to have to be diplomatic, or ignore it entirely. No point at romantising 2022 or even before NFTs, as with things, they're not so simple as a twitter 140 character count.

( I'll look at AWAY are we art yet Tumblr and see if I can get back to you, and I've been following Fox Key as my news man and takes on AI to stay updated. )

Deciding to not associate with anti or pro, or synth, I merely keep tract because to pick a side could lead into some opportunistic hurdles. However, I still resonate
with the existential naturalism that I had during my atheist days, (still do) so now reading and commenting on such blogs, it's been helpful thought fodder.

Bonus bonust link

He did one on data centers

I'll be keeping track of the info with this podcast on analysis with, Sam Harris?? Oh, he ain't ranting about muslims, hmmph. Welp, will document. It's called the last Invention.

I may describe myself as a Preparationist, i had the Misrablism of Doomerism in this discourse.

For the sakes of interpretation, This visualisation model includes all interpretability of the models with explanations. Well, all reinforced that this lacks free will with pre-determined indeterminacy going into a gradient descent of probability.

https://bbycroft.net/llm

You're a nuanced reader, aren't you? Well, there you go. Yet as I learn this, I'm going to go deeper.

Also, Philosophes debate consciousness of machines, like the materialist conception of the qualia.

The slopoxomy. Links.

(Maybe it's a homage to a comic, oh no, well, another way to not trust micro-bloggers. Slop + Taxonomy makes the discourse. Inspired by the contaxomy from quote mining.)

This is journalism slop to begin with. Amanda herself called these content hot-dogs rather than alchemy.

In the ludo-primordial soup of our subconsciousness of the play of our media, there's the struggle that existence since the dawn of time, it's our slop.

Appeal to composition ( oh boy, the fallacy lover isn't I, don't worry I do hate the argumentation that happens.) I can show if things are applied to new meaning. My Atheist was meant to do logic it with fallacies, even there were argument with others of fallacies a multiplying in every way. Oh, Can't compete with that infinity of fallacy.

Misquotes and quote mining, and the mountains out of molehills complex. Maybe due to the shortage of my impressions, with it quickly going out of my head, it's exiting my head. I'm not responsible for every little shock box when within twitter it happens to be another false, moral panic.

We know we are averages, and the unique commodity fetishier is the one that's made with all the things out of the way, yet with commentary non-fiction there's this aggressively average in the hopes of collecting views and impressions for the way, everybody's doing it, it's the social media doing its thing. Context collapse.

ICYMI Flazfire happened to do a video on this, yes, theres B-slur at the end which i don't personally use, no, I don't want to elaborate.

I'd need to filter this out, and it's not unique yet exasperated by ai, (It's become kitsch.) Welp, I'm a honest slopper; I do entertainment, I don't lecture. Yet even lectures are sloppified into a slush as Flazfire has pointed out.

Everything compact and its commitments are made into nothing, into a middle autonomy to try to do it. Welp, can't compete with it, not ai, not human, it's the publishers and the platform hosts that lead it. Moral panic slop, Seo Slop, Advertising slop, averages, always averages that are made sufficient with a workflow of today. Such is the age of information. We happy mutants will know about it as the masses play with it in their droves.

Guess with this age of cool-hunting an individualism, it's become more evident to come through. Even with the explosive element of radicalism and opposition, that negates meaning. We have been warned, and we are in it, from Harlan Ellison calling it out after rejecting the guild and the regressive elements of unions. To elsa-gate and today.

To add more, and to contrast it with the evergreen stuff. Here's a definition from this on slop. Welp, it's 20 min read, and it's got an examination of its relationship with the phemonon, and, what Sam Altman has released.

"Let's start with the intuition. What is slop?

Slop is written to pad the word count.
Slop is when you procrastinate on your college essay and crap something out the night it's due.
Slop is the logical conclusion of chasing the algorithm.
Slop is the distilled extruded essence of the Id.
Slop is when you have a formula and stick to it.
Slop is when you can guess the exact minute in a police procedural where they find the killer because it's the same in every episode.
Slop is when the k-complexity of the generator is low enough that you can infer its pattern.
Slop is eating lunchables every day at school until you puke.
Slop is when a measure ceases to be a good target.
Slop is the 12th sequel to a superhero movie.
Slop is generated from the authors prior without new thinking or evidence.
Slop is Gell-Mann amnesia.
Slop is in distribution.
Slop is when the authors purpose for writing is money.
Slop is a failure to say anything interesting.
Slop is what you find at the bottom of the incentive gradient.
Slop is a deeper simulacra level than it purports to be.
Slop is vibes."

Plus, he recommended this video that's evergreen, even if I'm not interested in music making, I found it fascinating of creative software, as a bonus.

 Double Bonus links!

https://simulacro.co.uk/introduction-to-slop-studies/ Somebody did a dissertation on the AI branch growth, Even though I find contradictions within the concept of encruddification, there has potential with the concept of epistemic crisis and collapse. Welp, Copywriters doing financial computationalism (David Oglivy) and the culture industry,

Licensing =/= Conduct

Well, this was the illustration with the publishers.

 https://www.authorsalliance.org/2025/08/26/resources-on-copyright-and-ai-updated-faq-and-position-paper-on-lawful-access-and-fair-use/

Even those for the copyright protections are disagreeing with making style a trademark.

The Idea/expression, internal/external, still needs to be said within literacy.

Stylistic, abstract conceptualisation is going to be even harder.

MMM, Misconduct, is that a philosophical performative statement on use? Don't misconduct? I wonder what it means.

Makes me think of the term Use by Geo

That why I disagree with Philosophy tube's saying with those statements with AI, of investment, if that's such a broad definition, this is a statement of investment. With my Ko-fi 

All return of investments are connected with freedom to access to freedom to choose. Or why I don't go on twitter artist.

.

Walk away, or embrace

Oooooh its the diviner

Sayer of things

Doer of things

Singer of things

Who it divines in psych, pro-anti.

Along with that, with this thought experiment.

Not being a pick me,

Going to go with autonomy

Can't bootlick, can't commodify, will go.

Walk away, or embrace, it's now unstoppable.

( Yeah, another poem spurned by seth, well,)

(( Post-post edit, I'll still follow him even if the stance may contradict mine, it is liberal. Yeah, I'm trying my ways with journalism with Ai, anti, pro, ameliorative or exasperative. Time to jump in. ))_

Thoughts on LLM/Diffusion Normalisation Compilation Ai

Or how I resonate with reallygoodai by Markiplier. Or at least, how this tech merely should remain open-source lest it be corrupted via the copyright industry complex.

Certain comic I'm seeing around, this is my edit, block me if you don't like this. I'll have to defend the right of self-determination against capitalistic entities. It may anger the Anti-ai purists out there. Sorry, gotta portray all my bad ideas sometimes, for better or worse.

Even a idea like that may have to have a truth I'm going to accept, not deny.

Not as bad as the Adobe trying to commodify style to censor everything, though.

 So, apparently, talking points need to addressed again, as I've been getting passionate about discourse, as I try to get out of it, it REELS me right back in! Thanks internet.

(From Flow Tv walking on latex, of soul-searching. )

In faux mercial's don't match the subvertisement of Plug it in by Basment Jaxx, or the fake infomercial by Adult Swim.

Wow, did this predict something or what? That's speculation as this tech develops.

With the in-faux commercials within the demo of Flow Tv, I can see a vigorous editor and visual effects will have to cover it.

It's being introduced into movies such a Dune 2 (blue eyes, I mean, going through Rumor). Yet with every industrial demand for product, the show must go on.

I'm surprised how this fae-like television will be occurring, of course it's Cat-nip for neophiliacs and technologists (good'n bad). Circling all over it like pigs in muck, It's new. As I've gone with Alex and Seth. Some have gone more cautionary, others have embraced like Gabe Newel

With researching all the essays and pundits, I'm going to have to concede, it's better if this stuff is open-source and not in the hands of adobe-Disney, for the increase of learning rights will only lend into more consolidation by monopoly capital.

It's Petit-boug (middle class) to see a Manichean relationship, to submit oneself to a counter-productive content id that It looks like the litigant oneself out of each way, it's trying to own the two-finger Vulcan salute and then making. Does everybody forget the days of all this detectification does? 

With the rise of certain entertainment channels, I'm going to have to accept the fact that neophiliacs are going to eat it up Because it's AI. It will be compounded by the fact that videos are the most expensive art form, with them bound by copyright and licensing laws.

(One of the ai tut sites does star wars IP franchise, I think he likes it with fan art )

Oh, There's a Christian ai video farm, merely going by speculation here with the number and could be wish casting, I think these may lead into other avenues and heavy users/viewers I don't like to think about, stuff that will make this urgh, marketable.

What am I to do with a those who use these tech to make their own livings? I'm not ya dad and my validation will count beyond the reach of this. We live in a society.

Additional to read on the copyright and environment talking points

This is a matter of labour, not the copyright industry complex.

https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2025/04/03/why-training-ai-cant-be-ip-theft/

On the amphibole of use (or the be pedantic, a Syntactic ambiguity )
https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2024/11/15/the-ambiguous-use/

Oh, and there's a bonus post on AI environment if you'd like

https://blog.giovanh.com/blog/2024/08/18/is-ai-eating-all-the-energy-part-1-of-2/

Environmental talking points still are the weakest and another.

This 2 hour interview on deep-learning for anybodies who missed it.
These are neural networks, something I've never conceived before.
(Wow, the book is 60 quid long, there's a lot of research with this, along with there being a meta for this of Instagram and all those AI entrepreneurs.)

Another one when a philosopher tackles the ontological question within learning and how it affects others.

Since our questions of intelligence etymological mean to select, it's with the architect paradox with more and less. (That could be a less of a framework with our own worse/better.) I'd only argue the brain ain't like a muscle, merely a stimulation organ. With a stimulus to fatigue ratio not related to tension. Regardless, I'd likely have a good conversation with him.

I wonder how he'll do with Khanmigo and the Khan academy. Not Sam Altman, Maybe Markiplier.

Thoughts...

• Generative AI is a buzzword: It's neural networks and deep learning
  
• So many models now.
• Still think it should be open-source with Aaron Schwartz with the Anti-Fraud. (looked at his documentary, it was moving )
  ( Note, there's a question of it keeping it open source that does not benefit this Ip centralisations/companies, it does open a conundrum, It's going to require the lesson I mention previously. 9:43-13:13)
  
  I'd hold my breath with Capital in conflict, or reconcile with media industry and tech industry. ( Move the needle? Move it for themselves? )
  
• Please conceive of other means of personal ownership and not the private ownership of copyright maximalism, I must ask. 
• This is why I self-publish with all this industry fuff. Grunt work and rote memorisation are being defended.
• All this talk of AI benefits/costs, talk of the bubble popping, has not added much.
• The fact that the copyright alliance attacked a diffusion model because it's Unlicensed is telling.
• "For profit world where slop machine is cheap and human labour is not" Still ricochets in my mind.
  
  
  
  Taking note of this pattern synthesis.

Despite my understanding or misunderstanding, I'll still keep track. Going to check out Moho.

Oh, with all these hours of reading material

Another on the Neural networks and how to understand them, as an auto-complete.

I'll be taking out of bluesky and other sites. No promises to going back to this tension is going to continue.

Conclusion:

Since preconceptions of AI confirmed is such a meta entertainment on microbloggers, I've attempted to adopt an AI ameliorate approach, since attempting to serve it towards IP monopoly landlords cannot be the solution. As with bad actors Hijacking multiple positioning.

Please, I still remain, Ai as open source.

Oh, with this principled distortion with a broad brush and monolith others with scrutiny, as with the reactionary humanist position with Alex Avile, I'll be still keep back as this justifies actions considered extremist, like sending death threats and fantasying about death. Only on micro-bloggers.

Principles, based on a micro-blogherence.

Don't people realise they've already been displaced as freelancers? There has to be an alternative.

See you again, or until I'm assimilated into a borg.

(I've tried to edit this back, that's what happens when you've got no editors)

authentic;artifice artification

From W.place live

I must consider the antonym that fits best, Obscurity for Clarity feels more fitting, along with now, It's time for authentic opposite and more symmetrical reasoning, if that means anything, triad or quadruple reasoning will have to rest.

What's artifice? Is it necessarily bad?

No, It's got no free will, it's only through its functionalism that we can ordain its purpose, it's not fair to treat it like an autonomous thing. I can't blame it for anything, Its responsibility is that like of electricity and energy.

It's all a tension and release. With no consciousness, the designs of the de- of the orginal users here.

Users of work schedules can be good or bad, if not personalised, it can be bad, each accordingly with the mileage that can vary.

So boop boop, or, it's something I thought with this video.

40 min, I'll have to comment on this again.

( Especially on the intrusive thoughts, as for unsolicited advice. Some good, some disagreements with the dystopian/utopian fiction, here'n there.  )

Welp, yeah, I'm doing a philosophy student again, I always go back to thinking about thinking, aren't I? I could to it all day. Meta for Clarity… Oh dear, obscurity. No wonder advertising has influence on other sites.

What all this consciousness and neural networks with Ai is showing the oddity and credibility of the chinese room experiment, so I'll go further.

Psychosis not, From Anti-theism Physchobabble in a subsect of Anti-Ai

 https://minihf.com/posts/2025-07-22-on-chatgpt-psychosis-and-llm-sycophancy/

Nope, I don't think this covers psychosis, it's reminding me of the way atheists accused theists that they are crazy. This was refuted, and it's not going to happen. The insane asylum ain't coming back.

No no no, let's not try and bring the insane asylum back. With the method being in the madness.

Moving past of the Victorian insanity accusations, we are to make it our pursuit to see how we can decipher and see mental illness and disability as a thing to go with, and that means AI too.

I could point out a bunch of men and suits with money as a bunch of freaks, yet that does not go to the heart of ideological and material conditions. It's going to get unhistorical.

Eschatology, End times have been with us all this passages, Yet's that associated with all cults like Scientology and bebops comet. Including, I must say, Atheism science fiction.

Ai Entertainment of infinite jest

Mass television is the most profitable, most attention getting device, and it's the matter where it's holding our interest.

They are cropping up, these other AI entertainment channels. Where they have their own Patreon and independent funding.

Guess I'm going to have to accept that. Are they finding a commodity fetishism with the neophliacs? The thing about slop being an indefinite category, meshing with human-made slop with elsa-gate. Is this slop, though? You decide.

We are way after Adorno with entertainment now.

I'm looking at Neural Vizz (@NeuralViz or the @TheTuringshow)@NeuralViz

Notes.

. Writing is the most important thing. Compelling it is for the narratological sketches of fiction. (XKCD managed to carry) It's merely mini-arch-plots and no anti-plots.
. Being direct with the AI usage, it seems to clear of llms and diffusion models with artistic ethics. Not necessarily infringing, and it's not to clear the political ethics, which my other editorials covered.
. Aliens? "Coming you live unlive"

. How to get one million squillion gazillions views, I guess technologists are racing for that mass virality in google search, never change. (I don't recommend ANY videos like this, recursive meta)

I'll repost that Ls Mark video. When I was most bitter and reading Doctorow.

I need to repost this to dispell search results. From these lottery diggers.
Guess it's not for me.

I watch as our infinite jests that continue. The Harlen Ellision Glass teat rant about hacks who cannot write themselves out of pay toilets. How the humans and mindlessness of Ais. The call of the given up artisans.

S***s AI Udemy Review, and other clarifications

(I'll never sketch myself as the nostalgia critic again, and it's not even a coherent expression because it's old stuff, yet.)

Time to describe a bad decision. Following from Seth's Claude Dog Post , I've deliberately postponed this review.

Short version: I've tried my best to not make this an entertainment spectacle by making it into a format video with bells and whistles. Course I took is off-the-mark, and I don't recommend, I then think more about Licence quoting a Cryptography guy and calling it. Due to the illiteracy of licensing, I had to rewrite my TOS.

Longer version

I bought a course by Seth. I'm not convinced with my wabi-sabi tendencies.
I buy it so you don't have to! I'm going through my disagreements and snorting book reviews. Maybe out of parasocial relationship, I've decided to buy his silly course on AI.

Welp, Here are 35 pounds discounted. I could not resist. Most interesting was building a career without AI. Comparing it with the weather and the species like Kevin Kelly. Yet here we go with a another movement I cannot predict.

Then I was recommended of Midjourney and Claude from Seth, and to put it on Youtube, youch. I haven't been into perplexity as it was.

With the ideas here, I'm certain that he's going somewhere here with a workable plan. He had going with something with productivity and value and why others must go and be impresario. A leader and not a follower (ain't that what entrepreneurs do?) Yet, urgh. It's still 85 quid now of this writing.

Axiological arguments of value creation do not apply to a Taylorist Industrialist, by the way, I think he notes that himself, yet that means that with are own urbanism that we are inter-meshed now it's a subject to be explored. That he did within his song of sigificance, 

He then goes into tasks and projects, within how that such a thing will be driven my freelancer cobbler automation and that clients concerned about productivity by the industrialist would as Henry Ford, those are thoughts are another time.

He claims lawyers certain professions aren't gone out of in five years real estate broker, truck driver, a pharmacist, a daycare worker is inconceivably not going to be replaced.

So now I cover with better uses of what techno-domnion and techno-affliation with such a mindless thing, he draws on deterministic free will and Daniel Dennet's Intentional stance. Oh, He also makes a claim that people don't go to Hackneyed Movies from Hollywood any more, I get not courting their opinion. Yet, Disney get's traction.

What can happen with this though is Seth's attraction with determinism as a position compared to Dennet's Compatiblism in regard to interpreting free will when it comes to comparing this tech with autonomy.

I ended up writing the review. (It's going to be licence ramblings from now on. Already done it.

"As a wabisabi illustrator, Independent. The implications of using AI have reached wildfire within anti-ai, I hope copyright cases get turned down because being into creative commons licensing, attempting to out-license it ain't going to work. It's nice to see somebody try to cool the flames down.

It's inevitable that in our times, though, I guess illustrators are either going to embrace or walk the opposite direction.  Impresarios such as us.

I mean, What will happen with disconnection of this day and age. I do hope that there going to be more essays that don't muddy the waters.

Brings me back to Niel Postman's Technopoly, that's such a thing. What the implications with our own designs such as it will pursue the conflicts here. You're thoughts on Henry Ford are poignant.

Thanks."

Got my Certificate, eh, yeah. There's that credentialism that's apparently I have to show now. Ugh, Udemy.

Am I supposed to be proud?

Further notes.

Technopoly out of all the technological books, this felt the most relevant to what's happening today. Even with the last two. This was, despite the disagreement western bias of Cold War terms, eeriey similar to Alex Avile reported on within the second video.

Well, thanks, I guess. I don't think AI-philes will get much, AIphobes will get average with the end with Seth's plan for those who plan to not build their business with it average, cannot fully recommend. He does summarise his ideas in his next post, hmm.

Hmm. Time to revise positions again. Judging from my previous notes.

Considering Steve Klabnick has a similar to mine, with being wary'n technological puritan. Not a Tech opportunist. I'm simply not the industrial bottom line, not Disney, not Nintendo, not King who managed to lay off its employees.

Oh, It's still generative Ai, well that could be a marketing term right now. Now for the last notes.

. Jumping in bed with For-profit companies for content ID is not going to work, a nightmare system as it is. I'd wish they call it copyright infringement, but everything is loaded with RFAA terminology. It is even argued that it ain't the case, the push to make fair use and fair dealings obsolete to apparently control the diffusion models and LLMs. Trying to marketize style will only consolidate power.

Again, licensing tends to encourage monetize/marketerize-or-die kind of logic, which I'm trying to avoid.

. Environment is a loaded gun, none of the essayists or pundits than Alex Avile, fight me on that one. I'd have to limit my micro-blogging after this. Bluesky and Xshwitter aren't going to be deliberately misinformed licensing.

. Education and connections with controlling tech have been noted with Peter Thiel. Along with certain reaction streamers championing it (not all). They should not be taken seriously anyway, anybody who takes thou opportunist ambulance chasers are confirming Neil postman has said about Amusing ourselves to death.

12 minute video, apart from the thing, this is going to move towards a hyperreality. How it is malicious theory to control with aimless categorization and normalisation as the maths cannot be determined by those who preprogram it. I mean Alex Avile has already touched on educational programs who happen to use with the Khan Academy.

This is a question for future generations, and the ones that will come afterwords.

Merely shows how what's at stake here.

Maybe I'm drawing a close parallel to the postmodern villain that Video's Team wrote. Copyright will end with Disney wanting to license our thoughts.

Lets hope for copyright-gate by the sovereign citizen types

(Futurama with that the ad-creep on dreams)

I'm agreement back to Flippo

"Unpopular opinion: the pro-copyright anti-information freedom response to generative AI is reactionary, and it’s bad in all the usual ways reactionary things are bad.
The tech is here to stay. The only thing being decided as a matter of IP law is whether open models will be a thing, or if the big rights holders will get to make a lot of money by licensing proprietary models. As before, I prefer a world where information and tech are free and accessible.
Like, I understand "I don't want to be put out of a job" but I really don't get "I want the tool that puts me out of a job to cost $159.99/mo from Adobe who licenses it from Getty, so I can rest easy knowing it was not trained on anything I made". IP law can deliver the latter, not the former.
Right on cue. Perfectly legal licensed training data. For OpenAI, Midjourney, and Google. Not for open source models folks can hack on and run locally. (If the copyright maximalist doctrine prevails.) All the downside, none of the upside. Yay for copyright!"
He points to this link https://www.404media.co/tumblr-and-wordpress-to-sell-users-data-to-train-ai-tools/

So I pour it, the course and the discourse. I'll leave looking at the AI entertainment channels next time.