Beep-boop Bioweapons

Some populist microblogger is misreading headlines once again. Screenshotting the headline and going (OH NO)

Wow, thanks, media determinism, with the moral panic industry complex with several 9/11s happening simultaneously. Now I know why I respect principled entertainers who distract from the stressful days.

This is to prevent viruses, not the other way around. Gonna quote Dame.

This only works if you don't have a copyright maxmilist poistion and platonic elitism, what where is midjourney doing, oh? it's medical scanners, nvm.

With Peter Coffin bringing in his documentary of what will replace the old breadtube order. Hbomberguy concerned with the platonic elitism with all

The damage of micro-bloggers and the comprehensible gap within the information age is an understatement; I can't do anything to fix this since I need to be a celebrity influencer in order to get any sway within this discourse.

Too ahead of this when I knew the terminally stuck in the presentism so I'm keeping it here.
Jeremy Bentham with the discourse being stuck within sunk costs within america
"If you want to know how AI will affect the world, don’t imagine current AIs simply continuing on into the future. Imagine the world being flooded by AIs that make our current models look like child's playthings—and those being used to build the next generation of AI. Imagine, for the first time, creating something much smarter than humans. I don’t know exactly what’s coming down the pipeline, but it will be strange and terrifying. We are summoning digital aliens into our world, and we are not ready, and we are complaining about the water they’ll drink."

Some politely unfollow me at this point. That's good enough; wading in with options undiscovered is part of the price of connectionism. We exist.

Couch Gregor looks like a bioweapon may be much harder than that. Noah Smith and Jeremy

Wow, so even with all the political scientists, white hat programmers vs black hat. The white ones work.

Sam Harisomy post with his links also works

https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/50/3/86/135683/Deception-and-Detection-Why-Artificial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wgImjg9PPc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_verification

Hugging Face? Well, here's the video on that and the cryptographer

He responded.

Now, we do the cyber-security dance once again. At least it isn't the chronobacteria theorising. So yeah, when they said mainstream media is dead, well, it's alive, perhaps for all the wrong reasons though.

Dead Audience Theory

Since sombody threw a tantrum at me using tts to read my academia.

I'm now brought to believe in dead audience theory.

 So, Now dead audience theory By somebody who is AI-assisted.

This had an ai assisted illustration in it.

Why is it that the anti-science sentiment of simple solutions to complex problems plagues me? middlebrow to highbrow misinformation in American polemics from 2022 2023.

Have you got it too, the mildest blue of tech value, then a shocked person in your stream?

By the look of things, I have not even followed this supposed technocritic once. I don't think he implies it; Neil Postman probably would be able to draw circles around him.

Why do I keep iterating? Well, I don't know; maybe because I have no influence outside of this little tiny plug. With all the things going on outside, I have to take into consideration other people's views the diversity of viewpoints from those who do use the tool and those who don't. 

I'm picking up nice signals that can help me complete my viewpoint in understanding these issues more holistically. Now, that's what you may call critical thinking.

Another political test?

Why... why.

Is this the brit monkeys way of a political compass in the modern era that's odd. It's political compass all over again. No.

oh I looked at his ai video, despite his inaccuracy's within licensing (To be ignored, I've already written about it.) it's pretty sane ending.

Oh okay, Moving on.

That Retweet threat that made me quit.

(Naive that I may be, I know that this may be ideal way. Yet clout, social relations and it's operations, I know it's not going.)

I confess, in 2025. Somebody _____ retweeted a death threat and made me depressed for days, on microblogger. It ruined my day with ideation I dare not recall. Had to leave at that point and consider alternatives. There is no sensible discussion, mindless dogma had ruined to internet. Like the mens rights/gamers vs the feminists back in the day.

To the one who thinks accused and taking it personally, do not, your are precious, and I wish not ill will and harm on you.

I'll be fine. My former Kantian ethist within my several years ago awoken within me. With all the reactionary tech-panic radicalisation.

It's locked within a audience capture, circularity, entertainment vs academics/intellectuals in my field then the totality of the spectacle. Something I pruned out of the for you feed so I could not get stress other than the tiny monopolies of something that ain't essentially contingent on a non-dialectic, on the essencilist of the spectacle.

With the need to transcend it.

Then, Substack with intellectuals, non-intellectuals, kidsters, I know that place has bad bloggers, it's one where academics are and the essay was, the written one. Still the same kind of moral panic with perceived job loss, which is why I made that couch-searching treck between philosophers, economists and political philosophers into an idea.

Will it matter that I decided to learn'n teach instead of fight.

Of an ambitious quest into understanding and trying to help a big-gap of those

Idk what to do with that knowledge, out of the moral desert. That i come to admit now.

If i was to blame the im-an-ally-not-bigoted-buts mindset that drove me out. Along with the American exceptionalism. Something felt wrong and my for you feed was the differentiated.

Doesn't matter of mental responsibility? What we are dealing hear where it's a eliminative mind, yet it miraculously has a mind! The pattern and the phenomena is the capacity to express a compatibilist in this regards for a simple question of ethics.

That's where i started to study that due diligence of sociology academics, left accelerationists and a relational companionists, oss programmers, transhumanists/bio cosmists and out of deontic reverence. Simply because I had enough with the polemics of the mass media and its lap dogs with the open source and it's proprietary venture capitals.

With all these dualitys, I haven't interviewed any billionaire, decided to make my own mind up. Out of the dialectic essentialism and into a former deontic past. Into a dialysis, or to explore an alternative, that's what resonated.

Somewhere 2024-25 I left here, with the For you feed of others.

Is this where your catechisms and constructed beliefs are? A deontic circle of peeps who got what they want. Perpetually, unpersuasively.

That is the curse of free will though, you have to acknowledge the good and the bad and recognize it's desire to exist.

This is how it feels like a techno-progressive who does not use AI ATP with the news. Welp.

Yet I'm too ahead of this when I knew the terminally only peeps.
Jeremy Bentham with the discourse being stuck within sunk costs within america
"If you want to know how AI will affect the world, don’t imagine current AIs simply continuing on into the future. Imagine the world being flooded by AIs that make our current models look like a child’s plaything—and those being used to build the next generation of AI. Imagine, for the first time, creating something much smarter than humans. I don’t know exactly what’s coming down the pipeline, but it will be strange and terrifying. We are summoning digital aliens into our world, and we are not ready, and we are complaining about the water they’ll drink."

Some politely unfollow me at this point. That's good enough, wading in with options undiscovered is part of the price of connectionism we exist.

Now that I must disrespect intellectual property by acting dumber and more gaggier. With a less attention to the punditry.

Guess they can do this if it's means have a sensible discussion. There is none

on the vulgar popular polarizations on the hustle funnel that microblogs encourage

Oh, and to work on my compatibilism bridge of economic transformation of this. I'll follow Flazfire's advice with art. Such is the futility of this in current year.

Beyond Bwubbles, Onto new analogy

🔮🛋

Update, there's a bubble discourse with this. As there are too many cooks.

Oh, don't forget that comment.
This everything is so fast with the concept of the bubble coming in 2022, I've decided to move on with a new state of economic transformation in iterations. Something that IDK what is happening

• Ed zitron. As far from the rumours that the bubbles got the pop with embarrassments, and with his news later, which I have no influence over along with no kinship. OOOPS well he's wrong thanks Ben Garrison.

• Peter Thiel and Mark Anderson and the and copyrighting have taken a different approach to the bubble, saying it's going to lead to abundance, said whole Boomer, utopia of some kind well, or something idealistic of that nature. Nah. (nope) 

• The concept artists themselves fake-believing with the copyright nuke. Think that the bubble will just automatically extinguish, including there employer Disney. Itself into a world of ultimate peace, it's still long going, it's getting more tropeish and predictable by the second, ignored in the low Tier. On that corners of the microblogs that's where it will exist.

• The YOU WILL LOOK SO INCOMPETANT WHEN IT POPS DUMMY by one of the intellectuals on substack I quoted on substack on cloaster. Nah, one poster came as supremacist. Idk something else. It felt like more a showboat rather than a manner to like it. (Post edit, he's went 180 and hates it too with the job annihilation job disappointment,)
  
  
  
  

  
  Oh yeah, the predominant 'left' also predicted that with niche
  Bitcoin, look how that turned out. I already covered it here.

The most plausible from a solitary cautious optimist, through the different variations, that there's going to be a quiet revolution of academics and other thing that is the one that feels the most plausible bubble right at this moment. Quiet with agile firms.

What if it's not a bubble yet? Other self reconstructing Bridgestone? The llm compatibilism.

One trying to reconstruct and build together once with each new filter list with each block and reconnection of construction. Blocks and discovery's from the connectionist substrate, to the reconfig an return and overlook of the relation of elite and popular, and the return to a natural duty.

When that comes, it's a matter to reunite and see which from the commodified community's that are made, it's the populist de-emergence of the matter of the integration of society.

So as a left accerationist it's going to be this meme

Back to the equilibrium, from a synthesis of many and one.

What foxkey is claiming there's an illogical bubble? Idk.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/the-all-or-nothing-vibe-shifts-of-the-ai-industry.html
Oh, blame the Hypers too. Good, bad. or not, Archive version

Conclude @pojmasta done his work,

On E_ Zi_____

Or Infamous at this rate, this is vulgar populism at it's core. Link

Is this anti-science? Anti-ecnomics? I've already points the way he treats his other technocritics.

"I want to clarify that I never claimed that OpenAI is a profitable business, or even has a good or sustainable business model, but simply that this data falsifies a big claim that Zitron has repeatedly made. He seems to have moved the goal posts to claiming that training costs should count toward the gross margins, but that is a totally different argument.

If you make money from your customers on average, you can grow your way to recouping even very high fixed costs. If you instead lose money from the typical customer, as Zitron repeatedly contended, then growing more will make you run out of money faster. This is an incredibly important distinction, and getting it wrong for so long (in the face of reporting from the Information, which Zitron favourably cites elsewhere, as well as independent estimates) is frankly disqualifying for a commentator on AI industry economics."

The comments on that is really what this has become, neither critic or booster/hyper

Why do you debate them? Because no, That's why. Look at the comments.

This has escaped sensible discussion and the ruination of organization within disorganization separation of populism and elitism of ideas inter-connect and naïve noble-savage can happen, yet with that. Tech being art in the aristolian sense, that we have to inquire if these are any serious matter or another vulgar critic of crassness to discard with Bull**** jobs that of socioeconomic to regard.

Renaming to reclaiming interpretation of the machine

Mental gymnastics? Social democrat mind or brain trying to reorder or resell? What are we to do. First, Abi Awomosu as the academics try to understand the new AI phenomena of interpretism. Which is is contingent on the question of free will.

Or she calls prompts poetry. Which is the natural language prompt or poesis

Does get feminist in it's critical theory.

There have been llm consciousness advocates, activists, and data workers who happen to reclaim it.

Abi calls this the language listening medium.

Another astrophysicist poet. Dr Sam Illingsworth, which is the problem of interpretationism, and with all that, it's a mental game. A language game, as Wittgenstein would put it. I haven't prescribed to his philosophy fully though. My least favourite.

The Doll Girl says AGI is a category error. Yet, I'll respectfully disagree with the mimicry claim. Since these claims come from power structures that may serve to placate thought.

My fave though.

Fundierung, or The umfunktionierung

Yet with these systems. I do it with others so it's another game

of constant arguing, culture war and 9/11s, So now with the definition games and knowledge by acquaintance. So we watch the words a anxious signalling, with this therapist noting it. (Here)

T

This one I can't remember getting this one, It's that of the way We know that way.

So yeah Guess it has a history, It's within all of this.

So a fundamentalist goes-

Thanks, interpretability research and with that it makes the programmers who dismiss and to the others that make it. It could all be as simple as that.

Aleatory performance art? Sequential sculpting? A foundherentist fits it whenever the crossword goes

More on hermeneutics