18+ Thoughtpad from a gay couch-sona, uncommercial model for a magical upholstery. Published illustrator. Hobbyist media theorist. Along with WIP sketches and updates. Opinions my own.
"I’ve had a growing frustration with the way AI skeptics, especially my comrades on the left, dismiss the likelihood of mass AI job replacement by pointing to quality problems that are both easily and affordably fixed.
Most creative jobs in the US aren’t making art that people care about. They’re making corporate slop that everyone hates, but which is necessary for doing business. The only people who will miss the human slop when it gets replaced with AI are the humans who used to get paid to make it."
Aaah, respect. Well, If it happens or not, have a look.
Listening to te the one and only Garth Marenghi's Bursted Earth. Or I could listen to Snoop Dog's voice read voices to me on Speechify. Which is more mediocre. Seth said it best with his own doomerism, anybody hustler stuff that he can use Stable Diffusion that's pretty alright, or the one and only illustrators he alludes to.
Or that, not rehortically, more convincingly. So that's his commodity fetishism and prestige. Magic and mysticism that can't be judges from the algorithm mindless data-landscape.
This is the life, of our shared pool of knowledge in the commons to us.
Yet so to radicalisation (For all the wrong reason) are made to make sure it goes away by those who go I'm just doing my job to relatable/symbolic capital.
Radical Polarization, principled within a stereotype of a cartoon villain taking all art, regardless of the socioeconomic complexity. Along with the government, that's a matter beyond my comprehension of the way, with its interactions with copyright in Poland and the manner of environment. How decentralized platforms happen to work with regulation with the wall of shame, to the means of holding it with account to our civil autonomy.
Now, we get to see that even with those who do and it's a long 4 day read.
The craft of natural sciences and the social, It's a prideful thing to be proud of.
gambleor said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that Thunderf00t and Pat Condell happen to hold positions which broad brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny."
Principle, as radical ideas that have questionable roots and Polemics.
I apply it to this situation. Similar to the baseless polarizations and the increased amounts of dead-end intellectualisms. They should have bombed a data centre already, yet they are complaining on microblogging. It's
Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them. They are ultimately a non-event.
Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.
Listening and having my beliefs challenged, not by debate, yet by hearing those not of the main-road.
The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started the all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within
Tesla and Nfts have been telling you of such wild dismissals, and I can read to that and draw it into info and into knowledge. If you've been wilfully misinformed, they are either hustlers or a bad actor. Hustler, there's only so much time to get the information that's sensible, that's not some BuzzFeed article.
Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls Baby Leftism for lack of a better term, (I call it Wilfully misinformed) Has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.
Yes, that's why I've had to moderate my stance on this, focus on broad brushing polemics provided by the perverse incentives of direct response (Things getting more outrageous than they already get)
This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:
. Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient, It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out.
Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class petit boug) Yet here we are.
Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels Group? weird centrist oppourtunists like Ed Zotron, hello?)
Is this yet another reach via angry straight white men, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism!
Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
The clanker slur 'discourse' has yet become ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.
Cussy nsfw rant incoming. Befor all of this started, 11 years ago. It's going towards the same trajectory. The bubble on social media is so isolated and that preponderance of response rates aren't like that. Not even a criminologist, there, shooting themselves in the foot.
I must return to the rant since of the small scale bubble of social media ain't reflective of activism at large, since the thing ain't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaption, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.
We will have to foundherently adapt to this epistemic tech, for no epistemological is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaption we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. This second order effects.
So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with properity drm? Misrabalist nihilists with the class action lawsuit, ones of blind faith
When they bring it like this. Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul Supporters, and Mens right activists, that's my prediction.
If boycotts look like this, then it's going to yet another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.
I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right
Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it.
I'm out, peace out. I hate how popular it's got. They will be this cussing scene, and I'll have to move into a separate host to do my work with all the litigious malpractice lawsuits wasting everybodys time.
... This nsfw gag Where's the criminology? The felony/misdemeanour? The Restorative and the retributive? Never mind, time to trial by combat random strangers.
No. This is Immanuel Kant's Greatest Misery for everyone argument. Where being miserable with thousands of copyright trolls is 'better' than having due process of fair use/fair dealing. Do these folks know they sold there labour our to these entertainment industries? Including Guillermo del Toro?
Oh, I guess the anti-ai polemical washing will go?
Speaking of Moral Panic washing, here's a hour on the moral panic within the west. Graphic detail warning. Happened with radical fems teaming up with Christian fundamentalists. It will happen again within the noisy vocal west.
(Haven't followed this, it was part of my news. There you go, have an intake of the discourse from the multiple streams of the formats into waves.)
As I try to have an opinion (no opinions allowed on Twitter, artist) of being reassembled rather than replaced.
Two Studys, One of the evidence on Reinstatement. Along with a working paper on Robots and firms I've read. So do entertain better ones before looking at microbloggers and anger there.
(That's the physicalism's way of testing, from literature to textbook. Learned that from bodybuilding.)
Alternative to the populist one that worlds going to end, merely because that elite class, ( Demographically Christian white men in the west, capacity qua capacity) going to control slightly less of it. With its token supporters.
That's one of my theories with labour markets being made anew, deproffesionalize and professionalizing of our cycle.
Here's a materialist/ideology interpretation of the AI with structuralism. As I learn the tenets to apply to my method of understanding the world of qualitive differences. Here's an hour of a book I'm getting. B-B-Bonus video
Beep Boop = Ai For any savvy reader out there, when I talk about it, within my microbloggers, I'm talking about it. I've to keep it low in case random aggro doomers come and nibble at
Since, its become a standstill of recursive doomerist. Ignore the news-headliners of ai being Jailbroken and come with me with my sources on knowing the beepity boopits.
Lump of cognition fallacy with the latest one here though, even though I enjoyed the definition of intelligence with less is more (Which is supposed to be a paradox btw.)
There, articulating theory's that better there, even the sceptics I felt like I learned something with intelligence being defined right now. Come and seek the new answers with a niche audience of about a bunch of llm/diffusion and creativity that ain't reflective within the bubble of social media.
Because it's ultimately, and most fundamentally inconsequential, those who beg for propriety drm and infinity of copyright trolls.
That's the positive aspects of ai. Biological pathogens being sorted along with the ways of lays being rigorously analysed, not seen and a foundation within discourse, only to test theories.
Really gives me hope, even though it's coming through anthropomorphic, well, I can converse now with capital. Big does not necessarily mean bad if it's governed well. We all can't be noble savages.
I'm a little ennui frankly, myself. Yet these layers of the onions are the self-described doomers.
Yet the idea of robot overlords getting bored as I skimmed through my the mathematics as entertainment made me interested, yet that tells something more about me than. It's by @jdp.extropian.net What about this, and Intermingling with the LLM engineers now because why not, This is what happens when a journalist does takes and even citizen journalisms.
Can't broad brush all believers at this rate.
Enjoy those links in the doomer examinations, because I'm not clicking em, to confess.
Oh, Fresh Episode of The last invention is here. I'll be putting these under the Beep_boop to show how much editorials I've done on AI. Clambering for certainty with opinions to how to find peace of mind.
I mean, bonus lecture at the risks and assessments of the risks, even the one I've done with psychosis one.
Since copyright is a state sanctioned monopoly. Non-binding and unenforced. Freelance contract workers and the useful fiction of firms. It's not a platonic natural law.
Fair use advocates are appearing out of the seams. I can only sympathise due to the misinformation of micro bloggers.
The technical term is infringement, not plagiarism, and it ain't a felony. More an embarrassment.
Propriety drm won't solve this. This lawyer questioned the nofakes act, I agree. Thankfully it's not in effect.
"Why you should be worried about the NO FAKES Act:
-Threatens free expression and fair use
-Expands copyright law with broad language and vague definitions
-Harms open-source AI and tech innovation
-Would impact transformative works like fan and remix culture"
Welp, wish it the best. The lawyer is getting annoyed with the concept of 'market dilation' I'd say due to long tail there'd be diffuse, and I'm looking into automation from other sources other than the old doctrine of dialectical materialism.
So I'm going to dive into a excommunicated character. Time to commentary time with my impressions.
Yes, I'm posting this. IDC if you disagree, and you see this as an endorsement. Cussy things asides with all the amounts. Here's he goes with the labour theory of value.
As with gatekeeping, well, better to gatekeep creative commons rather than copyright doctrinaire. Each vote of that only legitimises the system. (That's an anarchist saying)
I've had to my commentary with Hbomberguy and Innuendo,We may have had differences with the movie such as c*ties with me agreeing with feminists Podcast episode, that's here and there.
Oh and the content, I've simmered on that. It's capitalisms perverse incentives and race to the bottom, really. Any sociological, foundherent analysis yet nobody is calling the obvious thing out to Hbomberguy.
Wow, he's got excommunicated by the copyright doctrinaires! Woopsy. Going to abstain my judgement of the J. K. Rowling thing. Guess he's right to call out the harassment campaign of the liberal apologists of certain issues now left-coded.
(Even when then, Innuendo's This is Phil Fish video has passed in the past. He's doing presentations of thought terminating clichés now. Strongly Agree.)
Commentary channels with this Though over the word content means there's still some hope, along with left unity never being a thing since it's harder to accomplish, that's a good thing. Welp, with my own opinion of the content/format distinction being a non-sequitur.
It's gone south, though, along with Stephanie.
What happens with those full of social media capital of Symbolism and relatability do now? Get Sad and leave, or mad and try to consolidate and control. Have to agree with that. Yeah, Opinion has lowered.
Oh yeah, I've discovered his position on Ukraine for the moment, and I support their right to self-determination. Frantz Fanon Self-determination.
Agreement
Gen AI and propriety copyright
Fanboyish elitism
Understanding Sociology/neoliberal, and consumerism is not worker.
Prosumerism
The pontifications of the term content is a mindless popularity contest Malthusian Documentary one is strong.
Disagree
Certain geopolitical issues. (Maybe here and there though, Idk Already here and there.) Third campism. (I heard rumours that he talked with maga-coms? Not confirmed, don't take it at face value.)
References analogic reasoning to South Park, they are inconsistent to libertarian. Pot stirring provocateurs with their polemists, yet he's using them in a consistent. (That Took my jerbs gag always gets me.) (Post-edit Couch Gregor)
My emptiness that he may of not read Susan Hacks Foundherentism.
Gatekeeping, I'm suspecting more of moral panic and status roles of others on Twitter and all that pearl clutching.
If I gave a completely arbitrary game review score 6/10 for this self publisher.
Because i'm not a gamer! ohh, maybe i'll snoop in your podcast and five years. I'm a freelance contract worker who happens to do
I agree with him with licensing here along up until AI which I'm not sure he's clarified about. I'm sure he's mislead. Legitmate fears, well, enjoy a lot of dildos and adult themes in this. (Dildo references), Lot's of sex toys
I can't find myself enjoying 95% cases of licence. Wish it was consistent.
Replace EA with 'Disney' and replace customers with Independent artists. Class analysis and dialectical materialism.
It goes south with her reaction to the AI thought, Peter Coffin, Alexander Avile, Sunny'm Cheax, Andy Masley have responded better.
Now I'll see if I can make with Peter Coffin, being the citizen investigator I will have to see his own way with the ai. Oh She's wrong on NFTS too. So, I must do my bid adieu as a customer and not follow.
Beep boop, read my wires boy, read my robutt wires.
That's it! I'm reading a book because the copyright wingers using there existance on abolshing fair use are too much.
So I decided to try to get my moneys worth via reading research in this discovery of llms/diffusion models.
(Even if it's bad, I've read Ayn Rynd, is this comparable? Part of the writer's training! HOOOOOOOOOO!) Lets see how much this fascinates or tires me.
2023 Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick
I've changed my opinion
Starts with explanations of weights, and token prediction. Existential risk and ethics, lawsuits, Japan, ethics discussion. This if it's all a matter of understanding what the tech can do in terms of capabilities and incapabilities is going to really have to see through.
These four rules are his tenets that he elaborates on for a possible alternative with dealing with the tech, how people hide, how people use it, and what are the possible sci-fi futures that move along it. Here's his Ai Research blog.
I shall put him in the neutral AI category and better-reporting-that-Ed-Zetron-box. I'm going to keep his machine inferences under wraps.
Guess this is under the editorial because somebody having a nuanced take on machine learning is impossible now with this naughty journalist seeking those hot, HOT scoops! It's over-editorialised now, huzzah.
Doomerist to the anti. I really like this book. 5 stars, Americana angst like Infinite Jest. Fully recommend.
It's the way that's the, Humiliation machine, of insecurities.
The scene of the drama coming from the phone and the tension between the drama inside the internet and then
Then all the doom'n gloom with the discourse of ai, woman, the world, and misery, all ending in a place that's most hopeful. Where all the characters are made to go through waves and then the ending of the legelese, mwa. Being a internet dweller, I have to get off with all this long tail of discourse that we all sit in.
Phrenology, and you are the product with prosumer ai-detection.
Well, even with doctrinaires still madden me. Here's idea/expression dichotomy. The law does not protect genre, good one too. Idea's can't be selecting, they're collectively owned by the commons, and then there's the way that I'm going to happen. Expand the conception of copyright till it's impossible.
whenever someone suggests that a webtool can detect AI images, I do check them against: 1. a digital illustration 100% hand drawn by me 2. a photomanipulation created by me 3. a video game screenshot, unedited and taken by me so far, not a single "AI detector" has ever got 2 out of 3 correct that is WORSE THAN USELESS. "Determining which images have been created or altered with generative tools" isn't even a use case for gen-AI, somehow okay, well, that's your right, OP, but just so you know the linked tools were: wasitai.com [failed 1 and 3, correctly identified 2 as "not AI"] and thehive.ai/apis/ai-gene... [failed 2, said 3 "might include some AI elements", correctly identified 1 as "not AI"] usually I delete quote posts if the OP blocks me but I guess I'll let this one circulate, it's important to be aware of the limits of these apps. the best tool for detecting generated images and text is and remains: your human eyeballs. sorry
Magic bullet solutions
Video on educational applications.
Education industry complex, what are you going to do huh?
(There's a reference to gentilia storage.) Averages, I do not mind making a stream of consciousness response/reaction, yet at this time it's all meant to be forgiven. Time for another way.
You want to see a dead body?
Yet with all this computationalism, with Ai being the medium and the metaphor, it's now a claim ot explore this and how it's deplored. It's like we are in the stage of where with our media, it's becoming our metaphor with learning what it means to distribute our labour into our hands.
This content farm will continue and fix what is not broken. Delivering to their audience fast and cheaper, it's react-slop like them all.
Well, Thank you, Hume Is-ought gap, between exchange value and use value, and with direct response marketing and brand marketing in this age of information age.
Rawwr Kyro is doing his ranting here with notes on Tech Journalism.(If you're new, check out my other notes on AI and licence in the search bar)
I must do this the strawman to feel carthesis to my audience. (image from Deja 98 Rom hack)
"MuH FREEDOMS'n HuSTle'n Propyright rights MICKY MOU-" (oh my, this have SIX FINGERS??)
CRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCNCCCNCN Free Palestine! (Thats the thing, ain't it? It's not so simple as a dunk tweet or a microblog post It merely entertainment right?)
Let me clear some conceptual confusion.
A little petering out with News, welcome to journalism. It could be going completely public domain as things go on. The denialism and copyright self abnegation a defeatist dead-end, especially with the copyright-lets-be-under-the-kind-monopoly-of-disneys/nintendo-content-id-drm sort. I feel like I'm talked down like a child by westy liberals.
As copyright there to consolidate the distribution into capital. @tentacle.expert
"SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"
Aaah doctrinaires'n the anarchists, what to do. Always leaning in the sympathy of the Anarchist. Nightmare, asymmetric enforcement. What will happen when DRM and the commodification of scraping by big content will do? Will I'm not affiliated with that union like Lenin was. Class character first.
Are people in for a rude awakening once this DRM is applied?
Also, ain't Eddy Zetron and his bubble narrative bogus? NFT =/= Prosumer Gen Ai. Well, I've never listened to him anyway. He's still wiggling Coe? Meh. ...
(Now that I thnk about it, encruddificaton seems more like a absurd concept, even when I wrote about it. My hypocrisy alarm bells of a contradictory axis are going off. The only thing he's doing this is for his self-service now.)
I'm using my right in the editorial that hes... infamous grifting. The nft/genai comparison has done so much damage to the discourse. I've written about
Oh, he's got a diaper burping fetish, at least with my entertainment I put it under the legalese that it's fiction. Guess he's still doing his rounds a corrupting the entertainment industry.
He's name-searching and sending petty malpractice insults. Why is he the prophet and gospel to anti-ai dogma?
I'm outta there! No more digital nobel savage. I'm the excavator.
Well visual media has its own drawbacks, cartoon discourse ain't conductive, and it ain't hiding the malpractice of the dog piles I'm seeing on Bluesky I don't know why I'd say this. I'm not going to answer the dismissive hustling, it's not for me. Such is a mob rule and the wilful disinformation now.
"Just let me work! Anything. Desperate. Make me silly mindless entertainment. Do whatever specification you want sire, anything to serve! I want job. I need to prescribe as-written instructions"
Texas sharpshooter Fallacy anyone with this discourse with the talking points refuted?Does microblogging facilitate it. It's why I don't post some of these blog posts there. The biggest danger is that the discourse and comprehension they are getting are from a meme, and that's the discourse now.
Twitter and bluesky have destroyed discourse so that's, why I try to limit myself, it's indulging in the techmonoplitic manipulations that Neil Postman warned about in amusing ourselves to death.
Please, denialism and hustle ain't going to answer this question west, expertise going to lead ahead. "It's boring and it will go away!" Nope. I learned with the NFT stuff that this stuff is still present.
Oh, Even now, it feels like excuses to hustle more.
Even with the crash, will it be lose-lose (that's how a doomerist views it, I take it as neutral continuously.)
This article goes into the prosumer, marketing terms design for direct response and says these are statistical inference.
Link on don't be a A**hole of impossible principle and ideals. By my reflection of this thread on Tumblr. Paternalistic inspiration P*** will not be tolerated within my platform.
(Oh, I look and try and digest takes) Such as this retweet. I don't retweet in bluesky because of the fickle followers. You are one of the good ones though, who can trust an editorial and an opinion and not a short, quippy and wrong dismissal. I'm entertaining Neil Postman's amusing ourselves to death when I'm using that format. @eleanor.lockhart.contact another thing people don't realize when they fantasize about "the AI crash" is that you're going to see a *lot* more slop and harmful use of AI whenever the big companies do crash, because the crash would drop GPU prices drastically & make cybercriminals etc. training models much, much cheaper"
Oh, that is an idea with all these marketing predictions, something to take account for a preparation.
According to this Test which I felt it was polarising and misrepresentative, I entertained it again. Did my own Ai-identity, which reflected my one and only position. You're free to take it.
Many takes on the thread. Another Typology as an intuition pump to understand this. Well, it's a Cartesian graph again of positioning marketers use.
Find myself in agreement to this.
Now as Anil Dash with his own decentralised AI models that are plural, is it forbidden of Green version? Remix culture'n all that I lean on.
He even linked to the video, antitrust leads to trust, I take it.
Welp, Good luck with that with Really Good AI. Kyro will do what he does, Squashinghe west military industry complex.
I'll prepare for a new doomerist movement. I'm not going to associate with this anti-vaxx that's left coded, it's malpractice. Not much vision for the future other than the eternal present. This will cause hijacking and destruction.
Key 🗝 🦊 @keytryer.net· 2d Current anti-technological trends have no imagination of what the world looks like after this. They want an eternal y2k and an artificial ban on computation. "It doesn't matter if you cure cancer, if no one can be a doctor anymore." It's bleak to me.
Unless we build an alternative.
There will be, as an antitrust egalitarian I propose a right to the city
oh look my EFF stickers have arrived
Regardless, the discourse has regressed on Bluesky. Thank you for reading my rant.
-
