Yet this stream of consciousness where i entertain thoughts without committing to them fully is point, if they get offended or not, outside my purview, like how did can be responsible for that?
Is disclosing a bibliography a rant? Not that i know off, well, it could be a that i disclosed and overshared. Well, the bibliography is the part where one should overshare. Those are all the sources.
Authors can be authors without becoming authoritative on this, under there own volition of responsibility to do what they want and not intrude into others self-defence function for each other, co-exist.
They can be direct with me if my indirect bibliography in this blog.
🛋⭐
Here it is. Minus the sex joke.
It even intersects with Media Theory, Tim Wu Attention merchants, Matthew Bartholmew Adcreep, Seth Godin This is Marketing, (He has done a course on AI) Doug Ruskoff The Merchants of Cool and the Generation Like Documentary. Even Harlen Ellison The Glass Teat and the Second Glass Teat editorials on the television industry complex. Herschel Gordon Lewis books on copywriting. Woo! Foundherentism of evidence matters is why all these theories intersect like a crossword, By Susan Haack. Moral theory to Deontology and Utilitarianism somewhere in the background. Thank you! Phew 🛋️💨 Feel free to ask questions."
Yet, I know with this prosumer culture, do they care? Am I showing off? Or is it the part that is required? Well, it matters to those who read, no point to those who are illiterate, or the post illiterate now.
Can't lapse into consistency for consistency’s sake. Or simplicity for simplicity due to me not being able to face the Curse of knowledge with these simplified platforms of micro-blogging memes and gag shorts.
Those platforms are designed for those who don't read, and don't have a bibliography there, I will have there. It will remind me of the curse of knowledge which will permit me for another post.