Jawboning and a Retrospective of facing the mob

Skull for memory, No reference. Continuing the diplomacy or discourse of AI, well, On here atleast.

Have you watched Alex Avile and the backlash to the backlash to the backlash? Welp, you are in it right now, I've been trying to build bridges. I'd recommend you watch this before you become here.

I must commend Alex for not taking his video down, this odd collusion of hollywood conservatives that are hijacking and destroying movements needs to be noted.

(Cw, human rights rambling from a tired couch. Including a bit of a socialist analyst) Aaah, The defeatist, misrablist dead end of copyright, if Harlen can call them the 7th circle of hell with publishers, maybe I can place a spicy opinion here.

 Silence is capital, another monopoly, when everybody is trying to build trust on the internet, the editorial confessions roll out. Along with the drab examination of the liberal centrists who'd happen to defend the private proporty relations from consolidating commidy value, oh, such a thing that you could state

Journalists don't owe the entertainment media pr any slack. Alex Avile self-publishing that Nickles group disclosure. With such is the diplomatic to the copyright maximalists that he got crudded on. It's always a game, troll bait, and a hornets nest that does not have. He did not sign a non-disclosure deal unlike those of the copyright alliance did so he did a community service.

There's something awfully centrist with publishers wanting to consolidate the means of distribution then raise the commodity value of art, really? Is that the culture industry, I do commodity fetishism

From Deepdreamnights, a public domain artists.

"The anti-AI side isn't actually anti-AI, they're pro-regulatory-capture-of-AI-by-Megacorporations. The copyright anti-AI argument conveniently leaves it open for Disney, Warner Bros, Nintendo, Sony, the RIAA, all to make their own AI systems to lower their production costs, because they own more than enough material to make powerful datasets.
They get it, you don't, worst of all possible worlds."

imsobadatnicknames2

It was actually a very thematically important foreshadowing arc setting up the Online Artist Community™'s tragic descent into the very thing they sought to destroy (people who want to expand the digital mechanisms to enforce the concept of ownership of .jpgs)

So yes, in light of this new info, I'll be keeping a meter at the CYA copyright enforcement that will only entail a unsafer internet. It's there to empower publishers, not the artists.

‪xormetric‬ ‪@tentacle.expert‬· 08/01/2024
SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. Who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"

There are plenty of rights more important than copyright, freedom of expression is one of them, including the freedom to assembly and to protest. Yet it's alarming, so I'll keep a head low her and be sure to differentiate the western artists from the lower working classes.

It's why I've not been posting much, there are absurd paranoia brewing, and it's getting bleak, so sense of discussion as there no's certainty on this issue. Odd activities like Style phrenology along with echo chambers, doing research on this topic like it matters, people need to know the community service of Couch Gregor.

Yet this dirt-digging and wild speculation of ad-hominins only means that they're creating a spectre of free like Nintendo does with its own copyright, only that will understand that this time it's left everybody on the statecraft map in disarray.

I'll leave out with another quote retweet. It's a understatment that this DRM enforcement is going to accidentally be the most second order pro-ai, the bad pro-ai move that's going be, a worser regime overall.

So freedom of expression > copyright, the publishing script puts too much in the hands of publishers and record labels.

‪@valkyrie.hacker.gf‬
Follow
we're literally going to get mandatory DRM brain implants at this rate


B-Bonus retweet.
Erica "digifox" Kovac

I feel weird being in the "middle" on the AI Argument. The hype machine is out of control, but the anti-AI crowd is almost as crazy with the only redeeming quality being that they have very little control over anything.

I think that generative AI is anywhere from "a cute toy" to "mildly useful in limited contexts" and that Big Tech companies did nothing wrong in training genAI models the way they did because a stricter reading of fair use would risk disallowing many types of transformative work.

I think that the way it's being deployed by the hype-mongers is frequently irresponsible and sometimes deliberately attempting to provoke backlash. I think the long-term destabilizing impacts are minor compared to the overreaction dynamics at play currently.

Like the video model demo from OpenAI recently where they generated a fake closed circuit video of Sam Altman stealing GPUs from BestBuy or w/e seems like it must've been calculated to spook people.

  (My response to the hype mongers is well, sex sells, for better or worse.)

Ted Underwood‬ ‪@tedunderwood.com‬· 55m

Based on social media, you might think the US was in the middle of a Butlerian Jihad. But IRL neither party has shown much appetite for regulating AI; universities aren't trying to ban it; content industries are adapting to it. The venting is anti-correlated with change.

This is why no one is writing 10k words a week to counter Zitron's ~10k words about the uselessness of models, inevitability of collapse, &c. You don't need to write 10k words every week arguing that the moon should continue to orbit the earth. People who like the moon's orbit can chill.

I look at Alex Avile for speaking the truth, yet the Tailism of other entertainers along with the inanity of media monopolists. Those who consolidate the distribution. Means That one should always caution with publishers being friendly, there is already an agonise going on.

Plopyright hate post by Bintendo

Hopefully nobody proselytises with the doctrinaires. All the erotica about it is vastly superior to that business model. Well,

Worst thing about copyright is reducing all ideologies of art into transacting a monopoly to a publisher, that's not art. That outcome ain't the top of the algorithm of our attention of all the hits (Although I do get it, otherwise it's the fire hose kind of situation.)

Gift economies (that don't exist.) Pro bono work (Professional stuff) and Alternative means of models that don't mean being subservient to reactionary capital. Copyright is the biggest defence of monopoly, so it's necessary that is hides behind it.

Some Bluesky posts I've been collecting..

Retweet
‪@wwahammy.com‬· 3mo
Copyright is the most anti-worker invention ever. It allows companies to demand writers do free work and then decide after the fact whether they want to pay for it.
Lawyer>
‪Meredith Rose‬ ‪@mrose.ink‬· 3mo
COPYRIGHT IS NOT LABOUR PROTECTION. COPYRIGHT HAS BEEN ABSOLUTE DOG**** AS LABOR PROTECTION FOR THE LAST 400 YEARS PASS LABOUR LAWS. STOP ASKING COPYRIGHT TO FIX THE WORLD

Oh well, With a Fandom is that it's licensing malpractices with charity and other events, it's not something I'd like to flirt with. This video may sum it up, yet there's the amount of distrust to add to my reason of why am I not a gamer.

There's a continued insistence to enjoy toys and the pleasure principle.

Welp

https://www.suedbynintendo.com/ for all the litigious malpractices

This is what a monopoly without antitrust does to you folks: litigious malpractice.

(Bonus)

This has been going on for years with such a controversy. From the 1970's of the demonology of copyright. Twenty-page document of lectures of the thoughts.

A solution for Ai-identity, Anti-trust Egalitarian. Links.

Rawwr Kyro is doing his ranting here with notes on Tech Journalism.(If you're new, check out my other notes on AI and licence in the search bar)

I must do this the strawman to feel carthesis to my audience.
(image from Deja 98 Rom hack)

"MuH FREEDOMS'n HuSTle'n  Propyright rights MICKY MOU-"
(oh my, this have SIX FINGERS??)

CRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCNCCCNCN Free Palestine! (Thats the thing, ain't it? It's not so simple as a dunk tweet or a microblog post It merely entertainment right?)

Let me clear some conceptual confusion.

A little petering out with News, welcome to journalism. It could be going completely public domain as things go on. The denialism and copyright self abnegation a defeatist dead-end, especially with the copyright-lets-be-under-the-kind-monopoly-of-disneys/nintendo-content-id-drm sort. I feel like I'm talked down like a child by westy liberals.

As copyright there to consolidate the distribution into capital.

‪@tentacle.expert‬

"SMALL ARTISTS ARE NOT PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT copyright is a monopoly. to make a living, artists sell that monopoly to publishers. Thereby losing the right to their own art. Copyright is enforced in court. Taking someone to court costs money. who, of the small artist and the corporation, has money?"

 Aaah doctrinaires'n the anarchists, what to do. Always leaning in the sympathy of the Anarchist. Nightmare, asymmetric enforcement. What will happen when DRM and the commodification of scraping by big content will do? Will I'm not affiliated with that union like Lenin was. Class character first.

Are people in for a rude awakening once this DRM is applied?

Also, ain't Eddy Zetron and his bubble narrative bogus? NFT =/= Prosumer Gen Ai. Well, I've never listened to him anyway. He's still wiggling Coe? Meh.
...

(Now that I thnk about it, encruddificaton seems more like a absurd concept, even when I wrote about it. My hypocrisy alarm bells of a contradictory axis are going off. The only thing he's doing this is for his self-service now.)

I'm using my right in the editorial that hes... infamous grifting. The nft/genai comparison has done so much damage to the discourse. I've written about

Oh, he's got a diaper burping fetish, at least with my entertainment I put it under the legalese that it's fiction. Guess he's still doing his rounds a corrupting the entertainment industry.

He's name-searching and sending petty malpractice insults. Why is he the prophet and gospel to anti-ai dogma?

I'm outta there! No more digital nobel savage. I'm the excavator.

Well visual media has its own drawbacks, cartoon discourse ain't conductive, and it ain't hiding the malpractice of the dog piles I'm seeing on Bluesky I don't know why I'd say this. I'm not going to answer the dismissive hustling, it's not for me. Such is a mob rule and the wilful disinformation now.

"Just let me work! Anything. Desperate. Make me silly mindless entertainment. Do whatever specification you want sire, anything to serve! I want job. I need to prescribe as-written instructions"

Texas sharpshooter Fallacy anyone with this discourse with the talking points refuted?Does microblogging facilitate it. It's why I don't post some of these blog posts there. The biggest danger is that the discourse and comprehension they are getting are from a meme, and that's the discourse now.

Twitter and bluesky have destroyed discourse so that's, why I try to limit myself, it's indulging in the techmonoplitic manipulations that Neil Postman warned about in amusing ourselves to death.

Please, denialism and hustle ain't going to answer this question west, expertise going to lead ahead. "It's boring and it will go away!" Nope. I learned with the NFT stuff that this stuff is still present.

Oh, Even now, it feels like excuses to hustle more.

Even with the crash, will it be lose-lose (that's how a doomerist views it, I take it as neutral continuously.) 

This article goes into the prosumer, marketing terms design for direct response and says these are statistical inference.

Or not, this site says it's within the reach of knowledge and the emergent intelligence, or it's Inference of curational decryption matter. Arg.

Link on don't be a A**hole of impossible principle and ideals. By my reflection of this thread on Tumblr. Paternalistic inspiration P*** will not be tolerated within my platform.

I'm going to check the nuanced AI feed and do check out the for you feed too which is better than the discover feed too.

(Oh, I look and try and digest takes) Such as this retweet. I don't retweet in bluesky because of the fickle followers. You are one of the good ones though, who can trust an editorial and an opinion and not a short, quippy and wrong dismissal. I'm entertaining Neil Postman's amusing ourselves to death when I'm using that format.

‪@eleanor.lockhart.contact‬
another thing people don't realize when they fantasize about "the AI crash" is that you're going to see a *lot* more slop and harmful use of AI whenever the big companies do crash, because the crash would drop GPU prices drastically & make cybercriminals etc. training models much, much cheaper"

Oh, that is an idea with all these marketing predictions, something to take account for a preparation.

According to this Test which I felt it was polarising and misrepresentative, I entertained it again. Did my own Ai-identity, which reflected my one and only position. You're free to take it.

Many takes on the thread. Another Typology as an intuition pump to understand this. Well, it's a Cartesian graph again of positioning marketers use.

Find myself in agreement to this.

Now as Anil Dash with his own decentralised AI models that are plural, is it forbidden of Green version? Remix culture'n all that I lean on.

He even linked to the video, antitrust leads to trust, I take it.

Welp, Good luck with that with Really Good AI. Kyro will do what he does, Squashinghe west military industry complex.

I'll prepare for a new doomerist movement. I'm not going to associate with this anti-vaxx that's left coded, it's malpractice. Not much vision for the future other than the eternal present. This will cause hijacking and destruction.

‪Key 🗝 🦊‬ ‪@keytryer.net‬· 2d
Current anti-technological trends have no imagination of what the world looks like after this. They want an eternal y2k and an artificial ban on computation. "It doesn't matter if you cure cancer, if no one can be a doctor anymore." It's bleak to me.

Unless we build an alternative.

There will be, as an antitrust egalitarian I propose a right to the city

oh look my EFF stickers have arrived

Regardless, the discourse has regressed on Bluesky. Thank you for reading my rant.

Zach Weiner did this neat-o gag.

Ufiction to unfiction. Copyright horror story

Well, From this story of derative. Of ufiction, uncomfortable fiction. Is a good story on if copyright trolls had there way.

I'll keep tabs there still creatives at the edge, having opinions and are not gig workers, trying to make it, even with the pull of perverse incentives.

We need to drop the pretence that copyright censors
hip could end the Ai phenomena. Plus it could infringe on my right to depict Bowser within satire with proprietary DRM. This is universal enforcement, not selective like copyright trolls do. My fan art is textbook copyright infringement. The onus is on the firm nintendo to send a DMCA takedown if I commercialize it.

Based on Kant's categorical imperative of internal freedom. Treating each other through consciousness rather than objectifying.

The inputs and outputs don't match, technically so it's nebulous. Plus, Copyright is anti-worker with the labor protection. It's for distributors/publishers, not creative labor.

Thankfully due the infinite shelf space of the internet distribution, micro-distribution it will niche out even if it could try (It's not like it's Super Bowl mass advertising, where one will have to buy/ask advertising/celebrity endorsements to get traffic. )

All that indominable logic of expanding content id and conception of ownership (Do they understand that? The idea/expression dichotomy exists.)

Walk away from this one. 

Looking within licensing guffaw witin the knowledge economy 🛋🔎

Does nor exist, economists log off. There is the knowledge domain. What they ain't is a scarcity of knowledge. Such a scarcity with what is able to be searched today.

Such a dubious concept, along with the attempt of an intellectual monopoly and monopsony. As if thought can be controlled. Such a matter with idea's concepts and style that are too broad to be categorized with a thing.

This brings a division, on how these matters where tutors tell other artists to use reference, yet not when it comes to copyright, our that such a matter concerned with its own withering and the means to monetize.

These are the alternative laws with regard to displacement with others, with defendants can in regard to maximalism of licensing laws.

From Alix Aviles* second video.

Oh dear, looks like it's going to be a combination of AI and Copyright, yet with such licensing laws there's going to have to be a reimagining with them. Or circumnavigating them, as it merely will make fan iterations impossible.

Copying non-commercially was forever a practice within classical academics, I've done sight size method myself as a manner of teaching Copying were to mean to bring design patterns and their aesthetic axiologies into a new repeatably and consistency.
Copying will help transform and merge

A scientist goes does deep down of the ideology of libertarian, western thought - pro capitalist thought left behind via Ayn Rand. Well, I could draw a line down there, Adam does not know how that from Steven Jay Gould and to the moment of our technocracy of yearning for a sense of control, a matter that transcends copyright and the licensing laws of the ownership to our attention and the control of it with our attentional facilities

That reminds me when it's comes to AI within the idea of making our own ideas with controlling the conversation, aiming for the outsider.

1:34 hours (Yeah there was criticism where the sponsor previously, yet welcome to the machine of entertainment that we live in. )
*Anywhere, here's the vid

That's curious, that was a different definition of accelerationist, (Maybe he's using a different definition which I don't hold. The direct action plan sounds well, though. Also with something off-base with certain sources such as Mark Fischers miserablism.

It's all.. Mild and inoffensive, though, all things considered. Even with the direct action strategy.

Yet the legal battle, I can't really join in that circus.

(This one is on my to-read list, so many on the bucket list.)

Tom scott also did a video in regard to other work

Patricia also did a video in regard to understanding the licensing laws. It's not going to be easy.

Well, imagining other means such as a right to the city and other means of direct action is a anarchist methodology of accomplishing that's also suitable. Also, the handshake deal that is taken for granted. Such as a simplicity on that with a written agreement.

The copyright industry complex. Urgh. Why are so many willing to die on that hill?

Has our licensing laws every been pro-worker? Look at those perverse incentives.

As with the naturalistic reductionists with what happened with religion, so will there be a trend with our own licensing laws. What I also dislike about this reductionism that it reduces all aesthetic energy to how much will commodify it, the get-rich-and-famous contract. Something wiggling inside me is telling my that's not art.

So, to confirm.

LLM and Diffusion models are remixing tech that's mindless and iterative to our designs. Only through the deal that ain't contingent of NDA's and several escrow payments and paperwork, we could do work or anti-work that makes a difference.

Thoughts...

My editorial:

I tend to prioritize fraudulent behaviour than ontological perfection of IP/Copyright. John Lockian property rights are a liberal conception that can lead into petty sport of the printing press. (Even John Locke opposed monopoly, btw)

I don't like either the diffusion model training data and copyright. It's catnip to industrialists because they are about faster and cheaper product.

I'm currently doing more journalism within the legalese stuff, this gets quite

 editorial and even into political and economical matters.
Never underestimate the simple, direct transaction over complex.

Since property rights are easier to argue from an industrialist due to capital, it's only a matter of not playing their game. Only a different game and system that the independent not dependent of the commercial industry.

( Oh and if they decide to content ID this article on Goofy being incredibly hot, they erm I guess I told you so. Guess entertainment ain't an amorphous blob. )
Guess I'll have to preserve it here for great justice.

I guess this is a matter of taking a deep breath. Along with focusing on the main struggle. I guess that's enough of this hornets nest of da industry.

All rights reserved is an outdated licensing term btw. Bears repeating

Letter of disinterest of Beepity Boop Wars

It all started with a kerfuffle of reverse engineering accidents of Dall-E.

Then twitter became X and then an spectacle happened. Then the trolls declared open season on it, now it's a mess.

gambleor (on a shooting) said it best: "it seems to me like what is being stated is a principled distortion. The idea that (Bad actors) happen to hold positions which broadly brush believers of all stripes as though they are a monolith leaves them open to the same type of scrutiny." So we are now that stage of polemical convenience.

I'm not representative of my personal boycott of Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out and leaving.

So meta-polemics ooop

Do not harass this group, despite my illustration of them as nondescript clowns. I do recommend you safely ignore them.

Or why I'm not a Anti-AI, more neutral with no dog in the race. To a point I'm associating with the anti-Luddites.

I'm not representative of the Sam Altman/Elon Xwitter fire of beep_boop, it's a specific of copyright law defenders of IP Laws I'm calling out.

(Oh, I don't support the OpenAI fudge-up btw, this is me handling a complexity. I'll be misinterpreted and go several different ways due to reading comprehension.

The comfort of a bubble so that it all goes away of AI is low-key evil and advocates hustle culture/crunch. Thanks to the clown who started all of this. The moral panic is exhausting zealotry now. So I'm keeping it in academia and within 

Tesla and Nfts are stocks are a thing have been bad market crash opnions. Now It's another turn.

Wilfully misinformed Marxism or Leftism, or what Badmouse calls 'baby leftism' for lack of a better term (I call it 'wilfully misinformed' or Prerosterous), has been hijacked by absurdist moral panic in the insular bubble of social media.

This epistemic certainty is gone now, the hills to die on are of foundherent presumptions, all justifications that I'm dubious of:

• Propriety DRM and rent-seeking via copyright trolls because it was politically convenient. It's still privatisation of property. I'm not shooting myself in the foot, not my proxy to advocate for. These neural networks don't contain copies. Arguing otherwise will lead into danger. When the vulgarisation praxis hits, I'm out. Have to give it for fanart/fanfiction here. It's the worst possible argument of eliminative materialism of fair use.
  
  
  Any copyright framework that will forbid transformative works will have way more damage on startups, and fanart/remixs will be forbidden under the regime.
  
  Gotta claim these models are ontologically non-infringement by design; Input and outputs don't match. Fair use/fair dealing and within the public domain. Nobody should use the anarcho-capitalistic self-ownership principle here. It's way simpler when it's in the public domain; as an idea, nobody does it.
  
  Fan art and cover-band art will be banned due to civic responsibility moving from freelancers to commercial firms. Since the internet is built on infringement already.
  
  It's gonna be like the story the derivative. With the brain implants. Content Id from Disney/Nintendo.
  
  That's my Cassandra, unpopular opinion.
  
• Water has been refuted, repeatedly; here we are. Not even a carbon footprint.
• Psychosis is a de-minimus (About minimal things) Liability increases police intervention and expands to mental health.
• Reactionary Luddism, and it's bad, as reactionary things are bad. I know that's the double-sided side of small business (middle class/artisan/creative/Petit boug) Yet here we are.
•  Hijacking by bad actors attempting to radicalize to bad fundamentals like prosperity drm and water use (Nickels/koch group Group? Weird centrist opportunists like Ed Zitron,
  
  My charitable interpretation is they bought in. Most charitable.
  
  Is this yet another reach via an astroturf Christian (family value) fundamentalist, along with their token supporters, to add confusion and disorder within the public sphere with all this lobbying? Yes. They are pushing this. Tokenism!
  
  
  (I wonder what happen to Karla Ortz embezzling all those copyright funds into a reactionary regime is feeling.)
• Reactionaries promoting regulation ai regulation that will make age verification regulation a libertarian cakewalk. By Mark
•  Automation is a matter of capital and in regard to freelancers and firms. Too much epistemic certainty from those who aren't epistemic experts. (Post Edit, Also what will get replaced are teleological, capitalistic, commodified jobs in the job market, like copyrighters.
• The clanker slur 'discourse' has became ableist with bionic limbs, along with this being prosthetic intelligence discrimination. This is all high school grade status cruft.
• Also, reflexive consciousness is an argument of people who don't know, So I clarified my position here. I don't have complete certainty, functional conciousness man that I am. So I can't comment on it.
• No, That 95% is an orphaned statistic cheif, it ain't scholarship.
  
  When all the baseless assumptions are left with nothing to cohere, I alter my perceptions to fit a new point of view of care into moderation. They not start call-out/boycotts.
  
  The performative, showmanship and ruthless of the bunch have been the vocal minority. Back behind 1953 where it was uninvented by doxxing and harassing with malpractice. That malpractice is something I can't work with. Compare that sill reaction to the Sam Altman/Elon polemics, and that's not something I can relate too.
  
  Look at medicine, weather prediction, and new avenues.;
  
  They're merely lost. I'll have to be careful.

I must return to the rant since the small-scale bubble of social media isn't reflective of activism at large, since the thing isn't going to be televised and entertained. This is a matter of adaptation, even as these adoption rates rise with the coming tech.

We will have to interpellate to this epistemic tech, for no epistemology is sound under reactionary capital, yet adaptation we can survive, to not be subservient to it. The regulation via the state will make the age verification tech look restrained. These second-order effects.

So, I beg you, don't continue this campaign and stop this hole you're digging in. If you're calling the doomers AI bros, what does that make you with proprietary DRM? Misrablist with the Class that's supposed to be a civil lawsuit.

When they bring it like this.
Their boycott looks like this. This boycott will basically go nowhere given their broken radical roots, like Ron Paul supporters and men's rights activists; that's my prediction. Copyright censorship? Nope.

If boycotts look like this, then it's going to yet another fundamental reactionary blip of response rates.

I'm afraid this memeister/collage is right about this leopards eating its own face with its conception of ownership and property.

Over the pointless polemics over Altman and Elon, I can't get behind this anti-tech polemics for the sake of it. We are going to have to re-strategise with understanding this while ignoring the provokers.

So, it's going to be antitrust. Against the laws of censorship of copyright and odd anti-porn in order to win points to a privatised entity that's going. Good thing I'm going to self-publish. This has made me less radical and more of a sociological generalist in terms of allegiances for my campaigning for recognition.

(Oh and don't act like you've got a monopoly unless you go viral and get a Jeremy Clarkson endorsement, celebrity.)

And another bonus link of what to do with sociology by Nicolas D Villarreal. Of executive class dreams. That's a Marxist refutation

(bonus link.)

S***s AI Udemy Review, and other clarifications

(I'll never sketch myself as the nostalgia critic again, and it's not even a coherent expression because it's old stuff, yet.)

Time to describe a bad decision. Following from Seth's Claude Dog Post , I've deliberately postponed this review.

Short version: I've tried my best to not make this an entertainment spectacle by making it into a format video with bells and whistles. Course I took is off-the-mark, and I don't recommend, I then think more about Licence quoting a Cryptography guy and calling it. Due to the illiteracy of licensing, I had to rewrite my TOS.

Longer version

I bought a course by Seth. I'm not convinced with my wabi-sabi tendencies.
I buy it so you don't have to! I'm going through my disagreements and snorting book reviews. Maybe out of parasocial relationship, I've decided to buy his silly course on AI.

Welp, Here are 35 pounds discounted. I could not resist. Most interesting was building a career without AI. Comparing it with the weather and the species like Kevin Kelly. Yet here we go with a another movement I cannot predict.

Then I was recommended of Midjourney and Claude from Seth, and to put it on Youtube, youch. I haven't been into perplexity as it was.

With the ideas here, I'm certain that he's going somewhere here with a workable plan. He had going with something with productivity and value and why others must go and be impresario. A leader and not a follower (ain't that what entrepreneurs do?) Yet, urgh. It's still 85 quid now of this writing.

Axiological arguments of value creation do not apply to a Taylorist Industrialist, by the way, I think he notes that himself, yet that means that with are own urbanism that we are inter-meshed now it's a subject to be explored. That he did within his song of sigificance, 

He then goes into tasks and projects, within how that such a thing will be driven my freelancer cobbler automation and that clients concerned about productivity by the industrialist would as Henry Ford, those are thoughts are another time.

He claims lawyers certain professions aren't gone out of in five years real estate broker, truck driver, a pharmacist, a daycare worker is inconceivably not going to be replaced.

So now I cover with better uses of what techno-domnion and techno-affliation with such a mindless thing, he draws on deterministic free will and Daniel Dennet's Intentional stance. Oh, He also makes a claim that people don't go to Hackneyed Movies from Hollywood any more, I get not courting their opinion. Yet, Disney get's traction.

What can happen with this though is Seth's attraction with determinism as a position compared to Dennet's Compatiblism in regard to interpreting free will when it comes to comparing this tech with autonomy.

I ended up writing the review. (It's going to be licence ramblings from now on. Already done it.

"As a wabisabi illustrator, Independent. The implications of using AI have reached wildfire within anti-ai, I hope copyright cases get turned down because being into creative commons licensing, attempting to out-license it ain't going to work. It's nice to see somebody try to cool the flames down.

It's inevitable that in our times, though, I guess illustrators are either going to embrace or walk the opposite direction.  Impresarios such as us.

I mean, What will happen with disconnection of this day and age. I do hope that there going to be more essays that don't muddy the waters.

Brings me back to Niel Postman's Technopoly, that's such a thing. What the implications with our own designs such as it will pursue the conflicts here. You're thoughts on Henry Ford are poignant.

Thanks."

Got my Certificate, eh, yeah. There's that credentialism that's apparently I have to show now. Ugh, Udemy.

Am I supposed to be proud?

Further notes.

Technopoly out of all the technological books, this felt the most relevant to what's happening today. Even with the last two. This was, despite the disagreement western bias of Cold War terms, eeriey similar to Alex Avile reported on within the second video.

Well, thanks, I guess. I don't think AI-philes will get much, AIphobes will get average with the end with Seth's plan for those who plan to not build their business with it average, cannot fully recommend. He does summarise his ideas in his next post, hmm.

Hmm. Time to revise positions again. Judging from my previous notes.

Considering Steve Klabnick has a similar to mine, with being wary'n technological puritan. Not a Tech opportunist. I'm simply not the industrial bottom line, not Disney, not Nintendo, not King who managed to lay off its employees.

Oh, It's still generative Ai, well that could be a marketing term right now. Now for the last notes.

. Jumping in bed with For-profit companies for content ID is not going to work, a nightmare system as it is. I'd wish they call it copyright infringement, but everything is loaded with RFAA terminology. It is even argued that it ain't the case, the push to make fair use and fair dealings obsolete to apparently control the diffusion models and LLMs. Trying to marketize style will only consolidate power.

Again, licensing tends to encourage monetize/marketerize-or-die kind of logic, which I'm trying to avoid.

. Environment is a loaded gun, none of the essayists or pundits than Alex Avile, fight me on that one. I'd have to limit my micro-blogging after this. Bluesky and Xshwitter aren't going to be deliberately misinformed licensing.

. Education and connections with controlling tech have been noted with Peter Thiel. Along with certain reaction streamers championing it (not all). They should not be taken seriously anyway, anybody who takes thou opportunist ambulance chasers are confirming Neil postman has said about Amusing ourselves to death.

12 minute video, apart from the thing, this is going to move towards a hyperreality. How it is malicious theory to control with aimless categorization and normalisation as the maths cannot be determined by those who preprogram it. I mean Alex Avile has already touched on educational programs who happen to use with the Khan Academy.

This is a question for future generations, and the ones that will come afterwords.

Merely shows how what's at stake here.

Maybe I'm drawing a close parallel to the postmodern villain that Video's Team wrote. Copyright will end with Disney wanting to license our thoughts.

Lets hope for copyright-gate by the sovereign citizen types

(Futurama with that the ad-creep on dreams)

I'm agreement back to Flippo

"Unpopular opinion: the pro-copyright anti-information freedom response to generative AI is reactionary, and it’s bad in all the usual ways reactionary things are bad.
The tech is here to stay. The only thing being decided as a matter of IP law is whether open models will be a thing, or if the big rights holders will get to make a lot of money by licensing proprietary models. As before, I prefer a world where information and tech are free and accessible.
Like, I understand "I don't want to be put out of a job" but I really don't get "I want the tool that puts me out of a job to cost $159.99/mo from Adobe who licenses it from Getty, so I can rest easy knowing it was not trained on anything I made". IP law can deliver the latter, not the former.
Right on cue. Perfectly legal licensed training data. For OpenAI, Midjourney, and Google. Not for open source models folks can hack on and run locally. (If the copyright maximalist doctrine prevails.) All the downside, none of the upside. Yay for copyright!"
He points to this link https://www.404media.co/tumblr-and-wordpress-to-sell-users-data-to-train-ai-tools/

So I pour it, the course and the discourse. I'll leave looking at the AI entertainment channels next time.